Skip to main content

Full text of "Discourses concerning government"

See other formats


fl* 


3Cibrarp, 


N   TME  CUSTODY  Or  TME 

BOSTON     PUBLIC   LIBRARY. 


r  SHELF    N° 


AUAMS 


■'■WCl^>:'   '    ..i.^^,^- 


4 


y   / 


'////?  ^^^^a-^^j 


DISCOURSES 

CONCERNING 

GOVERNMENT; 

/ 

B  Y 

ALGERNON     SIDNEY, 

Son  to  Robert  Earl  of  Leicester, 

AND 

AmbalTador  from  the  Commonwealth  of  Engl  ant. 
to  Charles  Gustavus  King  of  Sweden. 

Publiflied  from  an  Original  Manufcript  of  the  Author. 

To  which  is  added, 

A  Short  Account  of  the  AUTHOR'S  Life. 

And  a  Copious  Index. 

VOL.     II. 


EDINBURGH: 

Printed  for  G.  Hamilton  and  J.  Balfour. 

M.DCC.L, 


ji. 


VuAM^lfiJI 


The  CONTENTS  of  VOL.   II. 

CHAP.       III. 

SECT.  I.  Kings  not  being  fathers  of  their 
peopky  nor  excelling  all  others  in  virtue^  can 
have  no  other  juji  power  than  what  the  laws  give^ 
nor  any  title  to  the  privileges  of  the  Lord's  anointed^ 

Page  I. 
S^eft.  2.  The  kings  of  Ifrael  and  Judah  were  under  a 
law  notfafely  to  be  tranfgrejjed^  p,  23. 

Sedl.  3.  Samuel  did  not  defer ibe  to  the  Ifraelites  the 
glory  of  a  free  monarchy^  but  the  evils  the  people 
Jflmild  fiiffer^  that  he  might  divert  them  from  de^ 
firing  a  king^  P-   '^7* 

Seft.  4.  No  people  can  be  obliged  to  fuffer  from  their 
kings  what  they  have  not  a  right  to  do,  p.   31. 

Sedt.  5.  The  mif chiefs  fuff'erdfrom  wicked  kings  are 
fuch  as  render  it  both  reafonable  and  jiijl  for  all 
nations  that  have  virtue  and  power ^  to  exert  both 
in  repelling  them^  p.  38* 

Sedl.  6.  ^Tis  not  good  for  fuch  nations  as  will  have 
kings ^  to  fuffer  them  to  be  glorious,  powerful  or 
abounding  in  riches,  /'•  45* 

Seft.  7.  When  the  Ifraelites  afkedfor  fuch  a  king  as 
the  nations  about  them  had,  they  afkedfor  a  tyrant 
thd  they  did  not  call  him  foy  p,  52. 

Se£l.  8.  Xjnder  the  name  of  tribute  no  more  is  under ^ 
flood,  than  what  the  law  of  each  nation  gives  to 
the  fupreme  magi jlr  ate  for  the  defraying  of  public 
charges  5  to  which  the  cufloms  of  the  Romans,  or 
fuffer ings  of  the  Jews  have  no  relation,  p.  61. 
Sedt.  9.  Our  own  laws  confirm  to  us  the  enjoyment  of 
our  native  rights^  P*  7^* 

Seft.  10.  The  words  of  St.  Paul  enjoining  obedience 
to  higher  powers,  favour  all  forts  of  governments 
r^okfs  than  monarchy^  p.  7^* 

Se<5t, 


IV  CONTENTS. 

Se£l.  II.  That  which  is  not  ju ft  is  not  law^  and  that 
nvhich  is  not  laiv  ought  ?ict  to  be  obeyed^         p.  ^-j. 

Sedl.  12.  The  right  and  power  of  a  magiftrate 
depends  upon  his  injlitiition^  not  upon  his  name^ 

p.  97. 

Sedt.  I'},,  Laws  were  made  to  direct  and  tnflrudl 
magiftrates^  and  if  they  will  not  be  direBed^  to 
reft  rain  them^  p,   102, 

Seft.  14.  Laws  are  not  made  by  kings y  not  becaufe 
they  are  bufed  in  greater  matters  than  doing  juftice^ 
but  becaufe  natio?is  will  be  governed  by  rule^  and  not 
arbitrarily y  p,   wo, 

Seit.  15.  A  general  prefumption  that  kings  .will 
govern  well^  is  not  a  fuficient  fecurity  to  the  people  y 

p,   119. 

Seft.  16.  The  obfervatlon  of  the  laws  of  nature  i^ 
abfurdly  expe&ed  from  tyrants^  who  fet  themfelves 
tip  againjl  all  laws :  and  he  that  fubjeBs  kings  to 
no  other  law  than  what  is  common  to  tyrants^  deflroys 
their  beings  p,   125. 

Sedl.  17.  King^  cannotbe  the  interpreters  ff  the  oaths 
they  take ^  p*   124' 

Sect.  18.  The  next  in  blood  to  deceafed  ktJtgSy  cannot 
generally  be  faid  to  be  kings  till  they  are  crowned^ 

p.   149. 

Se<5l.  19.  The  great  eft  enemy  of  a  juft  magiftrate  is 
he  who  endeavours  to  invalidate  the  contrail  between 
him  and  the  people y  or  to  corrupt  their  manner Sy 

p,   170. 

Sect.  20.  Vnjuft  commajids  are  not  to  be  obefd-y  and 
no  man  is  ohligedtofufer  for  not  obeying fuch  as  fire 
againft  laWy  p*   176. 

Seft.  21.  It  cannot  be  for  the  good  of  the  people  y  that 
the  magiftrate  have  a  power  above  the  law :  and 
he  is  not  a  magiftrate  who  has  not  his  power  by 
laWy  p.  182. 

Sed:.  22.  The  rigour  of  the  law  is  to  be  tempered  by 

men 


CONTENTS.  i^ 

'mefi  of  kmwn  integrity  and  judgment^  and  not  by 
the  prince^  "who  may  be  ignorant  or  '-jiciom^  p,   193. 

Se(^.  23.  Anik.oX\Q  proves^  that  no  man  is  to  be  in^ 
triijled  with  an  abfolute  power ^  by  JJoewing  that  no 
one  hio'Wi>  hoiv  to  execute  it^  but  Jiich  a  man  as.  is 
not  to  be  found y  p»  201, 

Sedt.  24.  T'hepowerofAM^wikxisCxizrivasnotgiveny 
but  ufurpedy  p,  205^ 

Sedt.  25.  'The  regal  power  "was  not  the  firji  in  this 
nation^  nor  neceffariiy  to  be  continued^  tho*  it  had 
been  the  firft^  p,  207. 

Sedl.  26.  Iho*  the  king  may  be  entrujied  with  the 
power  of  choofng  judges-^  yet  that  by  which  they  adi 
is  from  the  law^  p.  221. 

Se6t.  27.  Magna  Charta  was  not  the  original^  but  a 
declaration  of  the  Englifo  liberties.  The  king's 
power  is  not  reftrained^  but  created  by  that  and 
ether  laws ;  and  the  nation  that  made  them^  can 
oJily  correal  the  defeats  cf  them^  p.  234. 

Seel:.  28.  The  EngliJJj  nation  has  always  been  governed 
by  i  if  If  or  itsreprefentatives^  p,  239. 

Sedt.  29.  Theking  was  never  majier  of  the foilyp,  262. 

Sedl.  30.  Henry  the  fir  ft  was  king  of  Efigland  by  as 
good  a  title  as  any  of  his  predecejfors  or  fucceffors. 

p.  268. 

Sedl.  31.  Free  7iations  have  a  right  of  meetings  when 
and  where  they  pleafe^  unlefs  they  deprive  themfelves 

?/*^*^.  ^  p.  275. 

Sedt.  32.  The  powers  of  kings  are  fo  various ^  ac- 
cording to  the  conftitutions  of  feveral fates ^  that 
no  confequence  can  be  draivn  to  the  prejudice  or 
adva?2tage  of  a?iy  one^  merely  from  the  name ^  p,  284. 

Sedt.  3  3 .  The  liberty  of  a  people  is  the  gift  of  God  and 
nature y  p,  288. 

Sedl.  34.  No  veneration paid^  or  honour  confer  d  upon 
ajiift  and  lawful  magi  ft  r  at  e^  can  diminifj  the  liberty 
of  a  nation^  p,  293. 

Sedt. 


VI  CONTENTS. 

6eft.  25'  ^^^  authority  given  by  our  law  to  the  a^s 
performed  by  a  king  de  faElo^  defra5l  nothiiig 
from  the  peoples  right  of  creating  whom  they  pleafe, 

P'  297- 
Se6i:.  36.  7he  general  revolt  of  a  nation  cannot  be 

called  a  rebellion,  /•  300- 

Sedl.  37.  7 he  Englijld  government  was  not  ill  confti- 

tilted,  the  defeats  more  lately  obferved  proceeding 

from  the  change  of  manners  and  corruption  of  the 

times,  p,  309. 

Seft.  3  8.  'The  power  of  calling  and  dijjhlving  parlia^ 
ments  is  not  Jimp !y  in  the  king.  The  variety  of 
cuftoms  in  choofmg  parliament-men,  and  the  errors  a 
people  may  commit,  neither  prove  that  kings  are  or 
ought  to  be  ab joint e,  p.  314, 

Seel:.  39.  Thofe  kings  only  are  heads  of  the  people, 
who  are  good,  wife,  andfeek  to  advance  7io  interejl 
but  that  of  the  public,  p,  324. 

Sefl:.  40.  Good  laws  prefcribe  eafy  and  fafe  remedies 
againft  the  evils  proceeding  from  the  vices  or  in  fir  ^ 
niities  of  the  magijlrate  5  and  when  they  fail  they 
tnuji  be  fupplied,  p.  335. 

Se£l.  41.  The  people  for  whom  and  by  whom  the 
magiflrate  is  created,  can  only  judge  whether  he 
rightly  perforin  his  office,  or  not ^  p,  342. 

Sedt.  42.  The  perfon  that  wears  the  crown  cannot 
determine  the  affairs  which  the  law  rejers  to  the 

king,  ^  P'  ZSV 

Sed:.  43.  Proclamations  are  not  laws,  p.  359, 

SecS.  44.  No  people  that  is  not  free^  can  fubjittute 

delegates,  />.  368. 

Sedl.  45.  The  legiflative  power  is  always  arbitrary^ 

and  not  to  be  trufled  in  the  hands  of  any,  who  are 

not  hound  to  obey  the  laws  they  make,  p,  376, 

Se6t.  46.  The  coercive  power  of  the  law  proceeds  from 

the  authority  of  parliament^  ^*  3  ^  ^  • 


(  1  ) 


DISCOURSES 


CONCERNING 


GOVERNMENT. 


wakmt^ttmmmm 


CHAR      III. 


SECTION     I. 

Kings  not  being  fathers  of  their  people^  nor  e:)CceUing 
all  others  i?i  virtue^  call  have  no  oth^.r  jujl  ptwer 
than  what  the  laws  give  ^  nor  any  title  to  the  pri- 
vileges of  the  Lord's  anointed. 

HAVING  proved  that  the  right  of  fathers  is 
from  nature,  and  incommunicable,  it  muft 
follow, '  that  every  man  doth  perpetually 
owe  all  love,  refpedt,  fervice,  and  obedience  to  him 
that  did  beget,  nouriili,  and  educate  him,  and  to 
no  other  under  that  name.  No  man  therefore  can 
claim  the  right  of  a  father  over  any,  except  one  that 
is  fo  ',  no  man  can  ferve  two  mafters  3  the  extent  and 
perpetuity  of  the  duty  which  every  man  owes  to  his 
father,  renders  it  impoffible  for  him  to  ov/e  the  fame 
to  any  other  :  this  right  of  father  cannot  be  devolved 
to  the  heir  of  the  father,  otherwife  than  as  every 
fon  by  the  law  of  nature  is  heir  to  his  father,  and 
has  the  fame  right  of  commanding  his  children,  as 
Vol.  1L  B  his 


2  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

his  father  had  of  commanding  him  when  he  was  a 
child :  no  man  can  owe  to  his  brother  that  which 
he  owed  to  his  father,  becaufe  he  cannot  receive 
that  from  him  which  he  had  from  his  father  ;  but 
the  utnioft  of  all  abfurdities  that  can  enter  into  the 
heart  of  man  is,  for  one  to  exacl  the  rights  due  to 
a  father,  who  has  no  other  title  than  force  and 
ufurpation,  it  being  no  lefs  than  to  fay,  that  I  owe 
as  much  to  one  who  has  done  me  the  greateft  of  all 
injuries,  as  to  him  who  has  conferred  upon  me  the 
greateft  benefits :  or,  which  is  yet  worfe,  if  poffible, 
that  as  thefe  ufurpations  cannot  be  made  but  by 
robbing,  fpoiling,  imprifoning,  or  killing  the  perfon 
in  pofTeffion  ;  that  duty,  which  by  the  eternal  law 
of  nature  I  owe  to  my  father,  ihould  oblige  me  to 
pay  the  fame  veneration,  obedience,  and  fervice  to 
the  man  that  has  fpoiled,  imprifoned,  or  killed  my 
father,  as  I  owed  to  him  3  or  that  the  fame  law^ 
which  obliged  me  to  obey  and  defend  my  father^, 
because  he  was  fo,  fliould  oblige  me  to  obey  and 
defend  his  enemy,  becaufe  he  has  imprifon'd  or 
kiird  him ;  and  not  only  to  pafs  over  the  law  of 
God,  v/hich  makes  m_e  the  avenger  of  my  father's 
blood,  but  to  reward  his  murderer  with  the  rights 
that  comprehend  all  that  is  moft  tender  and  facred  in 
nature,  and  to  look  upon  one  that  has  done  me  the 
greateft  of  all  injuftices  and  injuries,  as  upon  him  to 
whom  I  owe  my  birth  and  education.  This  being. 
evident  to  all  thofe  who  have  any  meafure  of  com- 
mon fcnfCi  I  fuppofe  it  may  be  fafely  concluded,, 
that  v/hat  right  foever  a  father  may  have  over  his 
family,  it  cannot  relate  to .  that  which  a  king  has 
over  his  people ;  unlefs  he,  like  the  m^an  in  the 
ifland  of  Pines,  mention  d  before,  be  alfo  the  father 
of  them  .all.  That  which  is  abfolutely  unlike  in 
manner  and  fubftancC;,  inftitution  and  exereife,  muft 

be 


Sea.  I.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.  3 

be  unlike  in  all  relpecls  3  and  the  conclufions, 
which  have  their  ftrength  from  fin-jilitQde  and  pa- 
rity, can  have  none  vv^hen  there  is  not  the  leafl  fimi- 
litude  of  either.  And  tho'  it  were  true,  that  fathers 
are  held  by  no  contrads  (which  generally  'tis  not; 
for  when  the  fon  is  of  age,  and  does  fomething  for 
the  father  to  which  he  is  not  obliged,  or  gives  him 
that  which  he  is  not  bound  to  give,  fappofe  an  inlie- 
ritance  received  from  a  friend,  goods  of  his  own  ac- 
quifition,  or  that  he  be  emancipated,  all  good  laws 
look  upon  thofe  things  as  a  valuable  confideration, 
and  give  the  fame  force  to  contrads  thereupon  made, 
as  to  thofe  that  pafs  between  ftrangers)  it  could  have 
no  relation  to  our  queftion  concerning  kings.  One 
principal  reafon  that  renders  it  very  little  necefTary  by 
the  laws  of  nations,  to  reftrain  the  power  of  parents 
over  their  children  is.  becaufe  'tis  prelum cd  they 
cannot  abufe  it :  they  are  thought  to  have  a  law  in. 
their  bowels,  obliging  them  more  flridly  to  feek 
their  good,  than  all  thofe  that  can  be  laid  upon  them 
by  another  pov/er ;  and  yet  if  they  depart  from  it, 
fo  as  inhumanly  to  abufe  or  kill  their  children,  they 
are  punifhed  with  as  much  rigour,  and  accounted 
more  unpardonable  than  other  men.  Ignorance  or 
wilful  malice  perfuading  our  author  to  pafs  over  all 
this,  he  boldly  affirms,  "  That  the  father  of  a  fa- 
*'  mily  governs  it  by  no  other  law  than  his  ov/n 
"  will  ;"  and  from  thence  infers,  that  the  condition 
of  kings  is  the  fame.  He  would  feem  to  foften  the 
harlbnefs  of  this  propolition  by  faying,  "  That  a 
king  is  always  tied  by  the  fame  law  of  nature  to 
keep  this  general  ground,  that  the  fafety  of  the 
kingdom  is  his  chief  law."  But  he  fpoils  it  in 
the  next  page,  by  aflerting,  ''  That  it  is  not  right 
for  kings  to  do  injury,  but  it  is  right  that  they  go 
uripuniil:ied  by  the  people  if  they  do  3  fo  that  in 

B  2  this 


(C 


cc 
cc 


4  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

this  point  it  is  all  one,  whether  Samuel  defcribe  a 
king  or  a  tyrant,  for  patient  obedience  is  due  unto 
both  ',  no  remedy  in  the  text  againft  tyrants,  but 
crying  and  praying  unto  God  in  tliat  day."     In 
this  our  author,  according  to  the  cufiom  of  theatres, 
runs  round  in  a  circle^  pretends  to  grant  that  which 
IS  true,  and  then  by  a  lie  endeavours  to  deftroy  all 
again.     Kings  by  the  law  of  nature  are  obliged  to 
feek  chiefly  the  good  of  the  kingdom  -,  but  there  is 
no  remedy  if  they  do  it  not  ^  which  is  no  lefs  than 
to  put  all  upon  the  confcience  of  thofe  who  manifeft- 
ly  have  none.     But  if  God  has  appointed  that  all 
other  tranfgreffions  of  the  laws  of  nature,  by  which 
a  private  man  receives  damage,  fhould  be  puniflied 
in  this  world,  notwithftanding  the  right  referved  to 
himfelf  of  a  future  punifhment  j  I  defire  to  know, 
why  this  alone,  by  which  whole  nations  may  be, 
and  often  are  deftroy'd,  fhould  efcape  the  hands  of 
juftice  ?    If  he  prefume  no  law  to  be  neceflary  in 
this  cafe,  becaufe  it  cannot  be  thought  that  kings 
will  trangrefs,  as  there  was  no  law  in  Sparta  againft 
adultery,  becaufe  it  was  not  thought  poffible  for 
men  educated  under  that  difcipline  to  be  guilty  of 
fuch  a  crime  ;  and  as  divers  nations  left  a  liberty  to 
fathers  to  difpofe  of  their  children  as  they  thought 
fit,  becaufe  it  could  not  be  imagined  that  any  one 
would  abufe  that  power,  he  ought  to  remember  that 
the  Spartans  were  miftakeri,    and  for  want  of  that 
law  which  they  efteemed  ufelefs,  adulteries  became 
as  common  there  as  in  any  part  of  the  world  :  and 
the  other  error  being  almoft  every  where  difcovered, 
the  laws  of  all  civilized  nations  make  it  capital  for  a 
man  to  kill  his  children  -,  and  give  redrefs  to  chil- 
dren if  they  fuffer  any  other  extreme  injuries  from 
their  parents,  as  well  as  other  perfons.    Eut  tho'  this 
were  not  fo,  i:  would  be  nothing  to  our  queftion,  un- 

lefs 


Sea.  I.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.         '5 

lefs  it  could  be  fuppofed,  that  whoever  gets  the  power 
of  a  nation  into  his  hands,  mud  be  immediately 
filled  with  the  fame  tendernefs  of  afFedion  to  the 
people  imdor  him,  as  a  father  naturally  has  tovv^ards 
the  children  he  hath  begotten.  He  that  is  of  this 
opinion  may  examine  the  lives  of  Herod,  Tiberius, 
Caligula,  and  fome  later  princes  of  like  inclinations, 
and  conclude  it  to  be  true,  if  he  find  that  the  whole 
courfe  of  their  actions,  in  relation  to  the  people  un- 
der them,  do  well  fuit  with  the  tender  and  facred 
name  of  father  ;  and  altogether  falfe,  if  he  find  the 
contrary.  But  as  every  man  that  confiders  what  has 
been,  or  fees  what  is  every  day  done  in  the  world, 
muft  confefs,  that  princes,  or  thofe  who  govern 
them,  do  moft  frequently  fo  utterly  rejed:  all 
thoughts  of  tendernefs  and  pity  towards  the  nations 
under  them,  as  rather  to  feek  what  can  be  drawn 
from  them,  than  what  fhould  be  done  for  them, 
and  fometimes  become  their  moft  bitter  and  public 
enemies  :  'tis  ridiculous  to  make  the  fafety  of  nations 
to  depend  upon  a  fuppofition,  which  by  daily  ex- 
perience we  find  to  be  falfe ;  and  impious,  to  prefer 
the  lufts  of  a  man  who  violates  the  moft  facred  laws 
of  nature,  by  deftroying  thofe  he  is  obliged  to  pre- 
ferve,  before  the  welfare  of  that  people  for  whofe 
good  he  is  made  to  be  what  he  is,  if  there  be  any 
thing  of  juftice  in  the  power  he  exercifes. 

Our  author  ibolifhly  thinks  to  cover  the  enormity 
of  this  nonfenfe,  by  turning  Salutem  populi  into 
Salutem  regni :  for  tho'  Regnum  may  be  taken  for 
the  power  of  commanding,  in  which  fenfe  the  pre- 
fer vation  of  it  is  the  ufual  objedt  of  the  care  of 
princes  -,  yet  it  does  more  rightly  fignify  the  body  of 
that  nation  which  is  governed  by  a  king.  And 
therefore  if  the  maxim  be  true,  as  he  acknowledges 
it  to  be,  then  Salus  populi  eft  lex  fuprema ;  and  the 

B  3  firft 


6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

firil  thing  we  are  to  inquire  is^  whether  the  govern- 
ment of  this  or  that  man  do  conduce  to  the  accom^ 
phihment  of  that  fupreme  law,  or  not ;  for  other- 
wife  it  ought  to  have  been  faid,  Salus  regis  eft  lex 
fuprema,  which  certainly  never  entred  into  the  head 
of  a  wifer  or  better  man  than  Filmer, 

His  reafoDS  are  as  good  as  his  doctrine :  "  Nq 
*'  law,  fays  he,  can  be  impofed  on  kings,  becaufe 
*'  there  were  kings  before  any  laws  were  made." 
This  would  not  follow,  tho'  the  propoiidon  were 
true ;  for  they,  who  impofed  no  laws  upon  the  kings 
they  at  iirft  made,  from  an  opinion  of  their  virtue, 
as  in  thofe  called  by  the  antients  Hercum  regna, 
might  lay  reftricTtions  upon  them,  when  they  were 
found  not  to  anfwer  the  expeftation  conceived  of 
them,  or  that  their  fucceifors  degenerated  frorn 
their  virtue.  Other  nations  alfo  being  inftruded  by 
the  ill  eiTeds  of  an  unlimited  power  given  to  fome 
kings  (if  there  was  any  fuch)  might  wifely  avoid 
the  rock  upon  which  their  neighbours  had  fplit,  and 
juftly  moderate  that  power  which  had  been  perni- 
cious to  others.  However  a  propolition  of  fo  great 
importance  ought  to  be  proved  -,  but  that  being  hard, 
and  perhaps  impoffible,  becaufe  the  original  of  nations 
is  almoft  wholly  unknown  to  us,  and  their  pracfrice 
feems  to  have  been  fo  various,  that  wliat  is  true  in 
one,  is  not  fo  in  another ;  he  is  pleafed  only  to  affirm 
it,  without  giving  the  leaft  ihadow  of  a  reafon  to  per- 
fuadc  us  to  believe  him.  This  mightjuftify  me,  if  I 
fhould  rejeci;  hisaiTertion.as  a  thing  faid  gratis  :  but  I 
may  faiely  go  a  ftep  farther,  and  affirm,  that  men 
live  Ui.  J .  r  laws  before  there  were  any  kings  ;  which 
cann-""-  ^-r  denied,  if  fuch  a  power  neceffarily  belongs 
to  kuv^^  "dS  he  afcribes  to  d^cm.  For  Nimrod,  who 
eftabli:  ed  his  kingdom  in  Babel  is  the  iirft  who 
by  the  fcripture  is  laid  to  have  been  a  mighty  one  in 

the 


Sea.  iT   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.         7 

the  earth.  He  was  therefore  the  firft  king,  or  kings 
were  not  mighty ;  and  he  being  the  firft  king,  man- 
kind muft  have  hved  till  his  time  without  laws,  or 
elfe  laws  were  made  before  kings.  To  fay  that  there 
was  then  no  law,  is  in  many  refpedls  moft  abfurd ; 
for  the  nature  of  man  cannot  be  without  it,  and  the 
violences  committed  by  ill  tnen  before  the  flood,  could 
not  have  been  blamed  if  there  had  been  no  law  j 
for  that  which  is  not  cannot  be  tranlgreffed.  Cain 
could  not  have  feared  that  every  man  who  met  him 
would  flay  him,  if  there  had  not  been  a  law  to  flay 
him  that  had  flain  another.  But  in  this  cafe  the 
fcripture  is  clear,  at  leaft  from  the  time  that  Noah 
went  out  of  the  ark  ;  for  God  then  gave  him  a  law 
fufficient  for  the  ftate  of  things  at  that  time,  if  all 
violence  was  prohibited  under  the  name  of  fhedding 
blood,  tho'  not  under  the  fam.e  penalty  as  murder. 
But  penal  laws  being  in  vain,  if  there  be  none  to  ex- 
ecute them,  fuch  as  know  God  does  nothing  in  vain, 
may  conclude  that  he  who  gave  this  law,  did  appoint 
ibme  way  for  its  execution,  tho'  unknown  to  us. 
There  is  therefore  a  law  not  given  by  kings,  bat 
laid  upon  fach  as  fliould  be  kings,  as  well  as  on 
any  other  perfons,  by  one  who  is  above  them  ;  and 
perhaps  I  may  fay,  that  this  law  prefl^eth  moil 
upon  them,  becaufe  they  who  have  moft  power, 
do  moft  frequently  break  out  into  adts  of  violence, 
and  moft  of  all  difdain  to  have  their  will  reftrained  : 
and  he  that  will  exempt  kings  from  this  law,  muft 
either  find  that  they  are  exempted  in  the  text,  or 
that  God  who  gave  it  has  not  a  power  over  them. 

Moreover,  it  has  been  proved  at  the  beginning  of 
this  treatife,  that  the  firft  lungs  were  of  the  accurf- 
ed  race,  and  reigned  over  the  accurfed  nations,  whilft 
the  holy  feed  had  none.  If  therefore  there  was  no 
law  where  there  was  no  king,  the  accurfed  pofterity 

B  4  of 


g  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill, 

of  Ham  had  laws,  when  the  bleffed  defcendants  of 
Shem  had  none,  which  is  moft  abfurd ;  the  word 
Outlaw,  or  Lawlefs,  being  often  given  to  the  wick- 
ed, but  never  to  the  juft  and  righteous. 

The  impious  folly  of  fuch  aiiertions  goes  farther 
than  our  author  perhaps  fufpeded :  for  if  there  be 
no  law  v/here  there  is  no  king,  the  Ifraelites  had 
no  law  till  Saul  was  made  kine,  and  then  the  law 
they  had  was  from  him.  They  had  no  king  before, 
for  they  afked  one.  They  could  not  have  afked  one 
of  Samuel,  if  lie  had  been  a  king.  He  had  not  been 
offended,  and  God  had  not  im.puted  to  them  the  iin 
of  rejecting  him,  if  they  had  afked  that  only  which 
he  had  let  over  them.  If  Samuel  were  not  king, 
Mofes,  Jofhua,  and  other  judges,  were  not  kings  ^ 
for  they  were  no  more  than  he.  They  had  there- 
fore no  king,  and  confequently,  if  our  author  fay 
true,  no  law.  If  they  had  no  law  till  Saul  was 
king,  tliey  never  had  any  ;  for  he  gave  them  none  ; 
and  the  prophets  were  to  blame  for  denouncing 
judgments  againft  them  for  receding  from,  or  break- 
ing their  law,  if  they  had  none.  He  cannot  fay 
that  Samuel  gave  them  a  law  -,  for  that  which  he 
wTote  in  a  book,  and  laid  up  before  the  Lord  *, 
was  not  a  law  to  the  people,  but  to  ihe  king.  If  it 
had  been  a  law  to  the  people,  it  muft  have  been 
made  public ;  but  as  it  was  only  to  the  king,  he 
laid  it  up  before  God,  to  teftify  aeainft  him  if  he 
fliould  adventure  to  break  it.  Or  if  it  was  a  law 
to  the  people,  the  matter  is  not  mended  ;  for  it  was 
given  in  the  time  of  a  king  by  one  who  was  not 
king.  But  in  truih  it  was  the  law  of  the  kingdom 
by  which  he  was  king,  and  had  been  wholly  im-r 
pertinent,  if  it  was  not  to  biivd  him  3  for  it  was 
given  to  no  other  perfon,  and  to  no  other  end. 

*   I  Sam.  X. 

Our 


Seel.  I,     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.  9 

Our  author's  aflertion  upon  which  all  his  doflirine 
is  grounded,  "  That  there  is  no  nation  that  allows 
*'  children  any  adtion  or  remedy  for  being  unjuftly 
'^  governed,"  is  as  impudently  falfe  as  any  other  pro- 
poled  by  him  :  for  tho'  a  child  will  not  be  heard  that 
complains  of  the  rod ;  yet  our  own  law  gives  relief 
to  children  againft  their  fathers,  as  well  as  againft 
other  perfons  that  do  them  injuries,  upon  which  we 
fee  many  ill  elfeds,   and  I  do  rather  relate  than 
commend  the  practice.     In  other  places  the  law 
gives  relief  againft  the  extravagancies  of  which  fa- 
thers may  be  guilty  in  relation  to  their  children,  tho' 
not  to  that  excefs  as  to  bring  them  fo  near  to  an* 
equality  as  in  England ;  they  cannot  imprifon,  fell, 
or  kill  their  children,  without  expofing  them.felves 
to  the  fame  puniihments  with  other  men ;  and  if 
they  take  their  eftates  from  them,  the  law  is  open, 
and  gives  relief  againft  them  :  but  on  the  other  iide, 
children  are  puniihed  with  death,  if  they  ftrike  or 
putragioufiy  abufe  their  parents  -,  which  is  not  fo 
with  us. 

Now,  if  the  laws  of  nations  take  fuch  care  to 
preferve  private  men  from  being  too  hardly  ufed  by 
their  true  and  natural  fathers,  v/ho  have  fuch  a  love 
and  tendernefs  for  them  in  their  own  blood,  that 
the  moft  v/icked  and  barbarous  do  much  more  fre- 
quently commit  crimes  for  tliem  than  againft  them  ; 
hov/  much  more  ntcelTary  i  it  to  reftrain  the  fuiy 
that  kings,  who  at  the  beft  are  but  phantaftical  fa- 
thers, may  exercife  to  the  ricftrudion  of  the  v/hole 
people  ?  'Tis  a  folly  to  fay  that  David  and  fome 
other  kings  hgve  had,  or  that  all  ihould  have  a  ten- 
dernefs of  affe(!^ion  towards  their  people  as  tov/ards 
their  children ;  for  befides  that  even  the  firft  propo- 
fition  is  not  acknowledged,  and  v/ill  be  hardly  veri- 
fied in  any  one  inftance,  there  is  a  vaft  diftance  be- 
tween 


lo  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

tween  what  men  ought  to  be,  and  what  they  are. 
Every  man  ought  to  be  juft,  true,  and  charitable ; 
and  if  they  were  (o,  laws  would  be  of  no  ufe  :  but 
it  were  a  madnefs  to  abolifli  them  upon  a  fuppolition 
that  they  are  fo  ;  or  to  leave  them  to  a  future  pu- 
nifhment,  which  many  do  not  believe,  or  not  re- 
gard. I  am  not  obliged  to  believe  that  David  loved 
every  Ifraeiite  as  v/eli  as  his  fon  Abfalom ;  but  tho' 
he  had,  I  could  not  from  thence  infer  that  all  kings 
do  fo,  unlefs  I  were  fure  tb4at  all  of  them  were  as 
'  wife  and  virtuous  as  he. 

But  to  come  m.ore  clofe  to  the  matter :  do  we  not 
know  of  many  kings  who  have  come  to  their  power 
'  by  the  mof!:  wicked  means  that  can  enter  into  the 
heart  of  man,  even  by  the  moft  outragious  injuries 
done  to  the  people,  fometimes  by  a  foreign  aid  ?  as 
kings  were  by  the  power  of  the  Romans  impofed 
upon  the  Britons,  that  they  might  wafte  the  forces, 
and  break  the  fpirits  of  that  fierce  people.  This 
Tacitus  *  acknowledges,  and  fays,  ^'  That  amongft 
other  inftruments  of  enflaving  nations,  they  im- 
pofed kings  upon  them."  The  Medices  were 
made  mafters  of  Florence  by  the  force  of  Charles 
the  fifth's  army.  Sometimes  by  a  corrupt  party  in 
their  own  country  they  have  deftroy'd  the  beft  men, 
and  fubdued  the  reft;  as  Agathocles,  Dionyfius, 
and  Caefar  did  at  Rom.e  and  Syracufe.  Others  taking 
upon  them  to  defend  a  people^  have  turned  the  arms 
with  which  they  were  entrufted  againft  their  own 
mafters  ;  as  Francefco  Sforza,  who  being  chofen  by 
thofe  of  Milan  to  be  their  general  againft  the  Vene- 
tians, made  peace  with  them,  and  by  their  aflift- 
ance  made  himfelf  prince,  or,  in  our  author's  phrale, 
father  of  that  great  city.  If  thefe  be  afts  of  ten- 
dernefs,  love,  juftice,  and  charity,  thofe  who  com- 


(.1 


*  Inter  iriilrumenta  fervitutis  reges  habuere.     Tacit., 


mit 


/ 


Sea.  r.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       u 

mit  them  may  well  tliink  they  have  gained  the  af- 
fedions  of  their  people,  and  grow  to  love  thofe 
from  whom  they  rear  nothing,  and  by  whom  they 
think  they  are  loved.  But  if  on  tiie  other  hand 
they  know  they  have  attained  to  their  greatnefs  by 
the  vvorft  of  all  villanies,  and  that  they  are  on  that 
account  become  the  object  of  the  pubHc  hatred, 
they  can  do  no  lefs  than  hate  and  fear  thole  by 
whom  they  know  themfelves  to  be  hated.  The 
Italians  '^  ordinarily  fay,  that  he  who  does  an  injury 
never  pardons,  becaufe  he  thinks  he  is  never  pardon- 
ed :  but  he  that  enllaves  and  oppreffes  a  people  does 
an  injury  which  can  never  be  pardoned,  and  there- 
fore fears  it  will  be  revenged. 

Other  princes  w^ho  come  their  thrones  by  better 
ways,  and  are  not  contented  with  the  power  that 
the  law  allows,  draw  the  fame  hatred  upon  them- 
felves when  they  endeavour  by  force  or  fraud  to  en- 
large it  y  and  muft  neceifarily  fear  and  hate  their  own 
people  as  much  as  he  who  by  the  ways  before-men- 
tion'd  has  betray 'd  or  fubdued  them.  Our  author 
makes  nothing  of  this ;  but  taking  it  for  granted 
that  it  was  all  one  whether  Samuel  fpoke  of  a  king 
or  a  tyrant,  declares  that  the  fam^e  patient  obedience 
is  due  to  both  3  but  not  being  pleafed  to  give  any 
reafon  why  we  fl:\ould  believe  him,  I  intend  to  of- 
fer fome  v/hy  we  ftiould  not. 

Firft,  there  is  nothing  in  the  nature  or  inflitution 
of  monarchy  that  obhges  nations  to  bear  the  exor- 
bitances of  it  when  it  degenerates  into  tyranny. 

In  the  fecond  place,  we  have  no  precept  for 
it. 

Thirdly,  v/e  have  many  approved  examples, 
and  occaiional  particular  commands  to  the  con- 
trary. 

*  Chi  fa  injuria  non  perdona  mai. 

I.  To 


t:i  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

I .  To  tl  e  lirll: :    The    point  of  paternity  being 
explained ;  the  duty  of  children  to  parents  proved  to 
proceed  from  the  benefits  received  from  them,  and 
that  the  power  over  them,  v^hich  at  the  firft  feems 
to  iiave  been  left  at  large,  becaufe  it  was  thought 
they  would  never  abufe  it,  has  long  fince  been  much 
reftrain'd  in  ail  civilized  nations,  and  particularly  in 
our  own,  we  may  conclude  that  men  are  all  made 
of  the  fame  pafce,  and  that  one  owes  no  more  to 
another  than  another  to  him,  unlefs  for  fome  bene- 
fit received,  or  by  virtue  of  fome   promife  made. 
The  duty  arlfln?  from  a  benefit  received   muft  be 
proportionable  to  it :  that  which  grows  from  a  pro- 
mife is  determined  by  the  promife  or  contrad:  made, 
according  to  the  true  fcnfe  and  meaning  of  it.     He 
therefore  that  would  know  what  the  Babylonians, 
Hebrev/s,  Athenians,  or  Romans  did  owe  to  Nimrod, 
Saul,    Thefeus    or  Romulus,    muft   enquire  what 
benefits  were  receiv^ed  from  them,  or  what  was  pro-^- 
mifed  to  them.     It  cannot  be  faid  that  any  thing  was 
due  to  them  for  the  fake  of  their  parents  ;  they  could 
have  no  prerogative  by  birth  :  Nimrod  was  the  fixth 
fon   of  Chufli  the  fon   of  Ham,    who   was  the 
youngeft  fon  of  Noah :  his  kingdom  was  ere{D:ed 
whilft  Noah  and  his  eldeft  fons  Shem  and  Japhet,  as 
well  as  Ham,  Chuih,  and  his  elder  fons  were  ftill 
living.     Saul  was  the  fon  of  Chifli,  a  man  of  Ben- 
jamin, who  was  the  youngeft  fon  of  Jacob ;  and 
he  was  chofen  in  the  mo  ft  democratical  way  by  lot 
amongft  the  whole  people.     Thefeus  according  to 
the  cuftom  of  the  times  pretended  to  be  the  fon  of 
Neptune ;  and  Rhea  was  fo  well  pleafed  with  the 
foldier  that  had  gotten  her  with  child,  thatfhe  refolved 
to  think  or  fay  that  Mars  was  the  father  of  the  chil- 
dren, that  is  to  fay  they  were  baftards  -,  and  therefore 
whatever  was  due  to  them  was  upon  their  own  per- 

proved 


Sea.  I.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       32 

fonal  account,  without  any  regard  to  their  progenitors^ 
This  muft  be  meafured  according  to  what  they  did 
for  thofe  nations  before  they  were  kings,  or  by  the 
manner   of  their  advancement.     Nothing  can   be 
pretended  before  they   were  kings :    Nimrod  rofe 
up    after   the    confufion   of  languages,    and    the 
people  that  underftood  the  tongue  he  fpoke,  followed 
him ;  Saul  was  a  young  man  unknown  in  Ifrael ; 
Thefeus  and  Romulus  had  nothing  to  recommend 
them  before  other  Athenians  and  Romans,  except  the 
reputation  of  their  valour;  and  the  honours  conferred 
upon  them  for  that  reafon,  maft  proceed  from  ex- 
peftation  or  hope,  and  not  from  gratitude  or  obliga- 
tion.    It  mud  therefore  proceed  from  the  manner 
by  which  they  came  to  be  kings.     He  that  neither  is 
nor  has  any  title  to  be  a  king,  can  come  to  be  fo 
only  by  force  or  by  confent.     If  by  force,  he  does 
not  confer  a  benefit  upon  the  people,  but  injures 
them  in  the  moil  outragious  manner.     If  it  be  poffi- 
ble  therefore  or  reafonable  to  imagine  that  one  man 
did  ever  fubdue  a  multitude,  he  can  no  otherwife 
refemble  a  father,  than  the  v/orft  of  all  enemies  who 
does  the  greateft  mifchiefs,  refembles  the  beft  of 
all  friends  who  confers  the  moft  ineflimable  benefits, 
and  confequently  does  as  juftly  deferve  the  utmoft 
effeds  of  hatred,  as  the  other  does  of  love,  refped-, 
and  fervice.     If  by  confent,  he  who  is  raifed  from 
amongft  the  people,  and  placed  above  his  brethren, 
receives  great  honours  and  advantages,  but  confers 
none.     The  obligations  of  gratitude  are  on  his  fide, 
and  whatfoever  he  does  in  acknowledgement  to  his 
benefadors  for  their  love  to  him,  is  no  more   than 
his  duty ;  and  he  can  demand  no  m.ore  from  them 
than  what  they  think  fit  to  add  to  the  favours  al- 
ready received.     If  more  be  pretended,  it  muft  be  by- 
virtue  of  that  contrad,  and  can  no  otherwife  be 

the 


J4  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

proved  than  by  producing  It  to  be  examined,  that 
the  true  fenfe^  meaning,  and  intention  of  it  may  be 
known. 

This  contrad:  muft  be  in  form  and  fubflance  ac- 
cording to  a  general  rule  given  to  all  mankind,  ot 
fuch  as  is  left  to  the  will  of  every  nation*  If  a 
general  one  be  pretended,  it  ought  to  be  fliown,  that 
by  enquiring  into  the  contents,,  we  may  underftand 
the  force  and  extent  of  it.  If  this  cannot  be  done^ 
it  may  juftly  pafs  for  a  fiction,  no  conclulion  can  be 
drawn  from  it ;  and  we  may  be  fure,  that  what 
contra(fls  foever  have  been  made  betv\^een  nations 
and  their  kings,  have  been  framed  according  to  the 
will  of  thofe  nations  3  and  confequently  how  many 
foever  they  are,  and  vvhatfoever  the  fenfe  of  any  or 
all  of  them  may  be,  they  can  oblige  no  man,  ex- 
cept thofe,  or  at  moil  the  defendants  of  thofe  that 
made  them.  Whoever  therefore  would  perfuade 
us,  that  one  or  more  nations  are,  by  virtue  of  thofe 
contradls,  bound  to  bear  all  the  infolences  of  ty- 
rants, is  obliged  to  ihow,  that  by  thofe  con- 
trafe  they  did  for  ever  indefinitely  bind  them- 
felves  fo  to  do,  how  great  foever  they  might 
be. 

I  may  juftly  go  a  ftep  farther,  and  affirm,  •  that  if 
any  fuch  ihould  appear  in  the  vv^orld,  the  folly  and 
turpitude  of  the  thing  would  be  a  fbfficient  evidence 
of  the  madnefs  of  thofe  that  made  it,  and  utterly 
deftroy  the  contents  of  it  :  but  no  fuch  having  been 
as  yet  produced,  nor  any  reafon  given  to  perfuade  - 
a  wife  man  that  there  has  ever  been  any  fuch,  at  leaft 
among  civilized  nations,  (for  whom  only  v/e  are 
concerned)  it  may  be  concluded  there  never  was 
any  -,  or  if  there  were,  they  do  net  at  all  relate  to 
our  fubjed: ;  and  confequently  that  nations  fcill  con- 
tinue in  their  native  liberty,  and  are  no  otherwife 
4  obliged 


Sea.  I.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        i^ 

obliged  to  endure  the  infolence  of  tyrants,  than  they^ 
or  each  of  them  may  efteem  them  tolerable. 

2.  To  the  fecond  :  tho'  the  words  of  Samuel  had 
implied  a  neceffity  incumbent. upon  the  Hebrews  to 
bear  all  the  injuries  that  their  kings  fhould  do  to. 
them,  it  could  no  way  relate  to  us  -,  for  he  does  not 
fpeak  of  all  kings,  but  of  fuch  as  they  had  alted, 
even  fuch  as  reigned  over  the  flavifh  Afiatics  their 
neighbours,  who  are  no  lefs  infamous  in  the  world 
for  their  bafenefs  and  cowardice,  than  deteftable  for 
their  idolatry  and  vices.  It  was  not  a  plot  or  trick 
of  Samuel  to  keep  the  government  in  himfelf  and 
family:  fuch  fcurrilous  expreflions  or  thoughts  are  fit 
only  for  Filmer,  Heylin,  and  their  difciples :  but  the 
prophet  being  troubled  at  the  folly  and  vv^ickednefs 
of  the  people,  who  chofe  rather  to  fubjed:  themfelves 
to  the  irregular  will  of  a  man,  than  to  be  governed 
by  God  and  his  law,  did,  by  the  immediate  com- 
mand of  God,  declare  to  them  what  would  be  the 
event  of  their  fury  -,  that  fince  they  would  be  like 
to  their  neighbours  in  iin  and  folly,  he  told  them 
they  fliould  be  like  to  them  in  fhame  and  mifery  • 
fince  they  defired  to  caft  off  the  thing  that  v^as  good, 
they  fhould  fuffer  evil  as  the  produd  of  their  ov/n 
counfels;  and  that  when  they  fliould  cry  to  the 
Lord  from  a  icnk  of  their  mh'eries,  he  does  not  tell 
them,  as  our  author  falfly  fays,  they  fhould  have  no 
other  remedy  againft  tyrants  but  crying  and  prayings 
but  that  their  cries  and  prayers  fhould  not  be  heard. 
It  was  jufl  that  when  they  had  rejed:ed  God,  he 
fliould  rejed:  them,  and  leave  them  under  the  weight 
of  the  calamities  they  had  brought  upon  themfelves. 
In  all  other  cafes  God  had  ever  faid,  that  when  his 
people  returned  to  him,  he  would  hear  and  fave  them. 
When  they  cried  by  reafon  of  the  oppreflions  they  fuf- 
fered  under  the  Egyptians,  Canaanitcs,  Midianites,  Phi- 

liflines. 


i6  DISCOURSES        Chap.  lit 

liilineSj  and  othurs,  tho'  their  crimes  had  deferved 
them  all,  yet  God  heard  and  relieved  them.  But 
when  they  meditated  this  final  defeftion  from  liis 
law,  and  rejedlion  of  his  government,  God  feemed 
to  change  his  nature,  and  forget  to  be  gracious  ; 
*'  When  ye  fliall  cry  to  me  by  reafon  of  your  king, 
"  I  w\U  not  hear  you  :"  this  was  the  ftrongefl  de^ 
hortation  from  their  wicked  intention  that  can  be  ima- 
gir.ed  5  but  being  not  enough  to  reclaim  them,  they 
anfwered,  ''  Nay,  but  we  will  have  a  king."  They 
were  like  to  their  neighbours  in  folly  and  vice,  and 
would  be  like  to  them  in  2:overnment:  v/hich  brought 
all  the  caianiities  upon  them  that  the  others  fuffer'd. 
But  I  know  not  what  conclufion  can  be  drawn  from 
hence  in  favour  of  our  author's  do&ine,  unlefs  all 
nations  are  obliged  farioufly  to  run  into  the  fame 
crimes  with  tne  Ifrarlites,  or  to  take  upon  them- 
felves  the  fame  pun i (lament,  tho'  they  do  not  com- 
mit the  fame  crimes. 

If  this  v/as  not  a  precept  to  the  Ifraelites,  inftrufl^ 
ing  them  what  they  inould  do,  but  a  denunciation 
of  what  they  fliouid  fuffer  for  the  evil  which  they 
had  committed,  the  old  teftament  will  afford  none  ; 
and  I  hope  in  due  time  to  anfwer  fuch  as  he  alledges 
from  the  new.  Nay,  we  may  conclude  there  can 
be  none  there,  becaufe  being  dictated  by  the  fame 
fpirit,  which  is  always  uniform  and  conflant  to  it 
felf,  it  could  not  a^^ree  with  the  17th  of  Deuteron* 
which  fo  extremely  refl:rains  fuch  a  king  as  God  al- 
lowed, as  not  to  fufn^r  him  in  any  manner  to  raife 
his  heart  above  his  brethren  ;  and  was  faid  in  vain, 
if  at  the  fame  time  it  gave  him  a  power  which 
might  not  be  refilled,  or  forbad  others  to  refill  him 
if  he  would  not  obey  the  law. 

3.  To  the  third;  Vv'hatibever  was  done  by  the  com- 
mand of  God  againfl  Pharaoh  king  of  Egypt,  and 

againfl 


Sea.  I.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        17 

againft  the  kings  of  the  Canaanites,  Midianites, 
Moabites,  Edomites,  Amorites  or  Philiftines,  by 
Mofes,  Jofliua,  Ehud,  Barak,  Gideon,  Samplbn, 
Jeohtha,  Samuel,  r.nd  the  reft  of  the  judges,  comes 
exprefly  under  the  particular  precepts  and  examples 
promifed  by  me,  to  fhow,  that  God  had  occafion- 
ally  commanded,  and  his  fervants  executed  his  com- 
mands in  refifting  and  deRroying  the  perfons  of 
kings,  who  were  their  own  kings  alf^,  if  poflefilon 
was  only  to  be  regarded.  And  tho'  this  be  fufficient 
to  overthrow  our  author's  doGrine  5  "  That  vv^e  are 
"  not  to  examine  the  titles  of  kings,  whether  they 
*'  be  from  ufjrpation,  or  any  other  means  3  but  on- 
*'  ly  to  look  upon  the  pov/er :''  3^et  they  who  feek 
truth,  ought  not  to  content  themfelves-m.erely  with 
vid:ory  ;  or  to  efteem  that  a  viQiorj,  which  is  ob- 
tained by  what  the  fchccls  call  Argumentum  ad  ho- 
minera,  grounded  upon  a  falfe  propoiition,  and  is  of 
no  force  except  againft  thofe  who  are  fo  ill  advifed 
to  advance  it.  Therefore  laying  afide  the  advantages 
that  may  be  juftly  taken  againft  Filmer,  for  the  folly 
of  afferting  the  fame  right  to  be  in  an  ufurper,  as  in 
a  lawful  prince ;  and  confefGng  that  tho'  fuch  as 
have  no  title,  may  and  ought  to  be  fuppreifed  as 
enemies  and  robbers,  when  refpe6l  and  obedience  is 
due  to  thofe  who  are  rightly  inftituted  ;  I  fay,  that 
none  can  be  claimed  by  a  prince  lav/fully  inftituted, 
if  he  affume  to  himfelf  a  power  which  is  not  grant- 
ed to  him  by  the  law  of  his  infcitution,  bec-;ufe,  as 
Grotius  fays  *,  "  his  legal  power  doss  not  extend 
*'  fo  far  ,"  or  turn  the  power  that  is  given  him,  to 
ends  contrary  to  thofe  for  w^^ich  it  was  given,  be- 
caufe  he  thereby  deftroys  it,  and  puts  himfelf  into 
the  fame  condition  as  if  it  had  never  been.  This  is 
proved  by  the  example  of  Saul  ;  tho'  the  peoole 

*  QiirL  e?:tenus  non  Labct  i'mperium.     l^ejiir.heL 

Vol,  II.  'C  fmned 


c 


i8  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

finned  grievoufly  in  ajQcing  a  king,  yet  God  affent- 
ing  to  their  demand,  no  prince  was  ever  more  fo- 
lemnly  inftituted  than  he.  The  people  chofe  him 
by  lot  from  amongil  all  the  tribes,  and  he  was  plac  d 
in  the  throne  by  the  general  confent  of  the  whole 
nation  :  but  he  turning  his  lawful  power  into  ty- 
ranny, difobeying  the  word  of  the  prophet,  flaying 
the  priefts,  fparing  the  Amalekites,  and  oppreffing 
the  innocent,  overthrew  his  own  right;  and  God 
declared  the  kingdom,  which  had  been  given  him 
under  a  conditional  promife  of  perpetuity,  to  be  in- 
tirely  abrogated.  This  did  not  only  give  a  right  to 
the  whole  people  of  oppofing  him,  but  to  every  par- 
ticular man  ;  and  upon  this  account  David  did  not 
only  fly  from  his  fury,  but  refifted  it.  He  made 
himfelf  head  of  all  the  difcon tented  perfons  that 
would  follow  him  :  he  had  at  firft  four,  and  after- 
wards fix  hundred  m.en  -,  he  kept  thefe  in  arms 
againfl:  Saul,  and  lived  upon  the  country  ^  and  re- 
folved  to  deftroy  Nabal  with  all  his  houfe,  only  for 
refufing  to  fend  provifions  for  his  men.  Finding 
himfelf  weak  and  unfafe,  he  went  to  Achifh  the 
Philifliinc,  and  offered  his  fervice  even  againfl:  Ifrael. 
This  w^as  never  reputed  a  fin  in  David,  or  in  thofe 
that  followed  him,  by  any  except  the  wicked  court- 
flatterer  Doeg  the  Edomite,  and  the  drunken  fool 
Nabal,  who  is  faid  to  have  been  a  man  of  Belial. 

If  it  be  obje(fled,  that  this  was  rather  a  flight  than 
a  war,  in  as  much  as  he  neither  killed  Saul  nor  his 
men,  or  that  he  made  war  as  a  king  anointed  by  Sa- 
muel ;  I  anfwer,  that  he  who  had  fix  hundred  men, 
and  entertained  as  many  as  cam.e  to  him,  fufficiently 
fliew'd  his  intention  rather  to  refifl;  than  to  fly  :  and 
no  other  rcafon  can  be  given  why  he  did  not  farther 
purfue  that  intention,  than  that  he  had  no  greater 
power  :  and  he  who  arms  fix  hundred  men  againfl: 

his 


Sea.  I.      CONCERNING  GOVERNiMENT.        iq 

his  prince,  when  he  can  have  no  more,  can  no  more 
be  faid  to  obey  patiently,  than  if  he  had  To  many 
hundreds  of  thoufands.  This  holds;  tho'  he  kill 
no  man,  for  that  is  not  the  war,  but  the  manner  of 
making  it  :  and  'twere  as  abfard  to  fay  David  made 
no  war,  becaufe  he  killed  no  men,  as  that  Charles 
the  eighth  made  no  war  in  Italy,  becaufe  Guicciar- 
din  fays,  he  conquered  Naples  without  breaking  a 
lance.  But  as  David's  ftrength  increafed,  he  grew 
to  be  lefs  fparing  of  blood.  Thofe  who  fay  kings 
never  die,  but  that  the  right  is  immediately  transfer- 
ed  to  the  next  heirs,  cannot  deny  that  Iftiboflieth 
inherited  the  right  of  Saul,  and  that  David  had  no 
other  right  of  making  war  againft  him.,  than  againft 
Saul,  unlefs  it  were  conferred  upon  him  by  the  tribe 
ofjudahthat  made  him  king.  If  this  be  true,  it 
'muft  be  confelTed  that  not  only  a  wliole  people,  but 
a  part  of  them,  may  at  their  own  pleafure  abrogate 
a  kingdom,  tho*  never  fo  well  efiablifiied  by  com- 
mon confent ;  for  none  was  ever  nlore  folemnly  in- 
ftituted  than  that  of  Saul  3  and  few  fabjecls  have 
iTiore  ftrongly  obliged  themfelves  to  be  obedient.  If 
it  be  not  true,  the  example  of  Nabal  is  to  he  fol- 
lowed j  and  David,  tho'  guided  by  the  ij^irit  of 
God,  deferves  to  be  condemned  as  a  fellow  that  rofe 
up  againft  his  mafter. 

If  to  elude  this  it  be  faid,  that  God  inftituted  and 
abrogated  Saul's  kingdom,  and  that  David  to  whom 
the  right  v/as  tranfm.itted,  might  therefore  proceed 
againft  him  and  his  heirs  as  private  men  :  I  anfwer, 
that  if  the  obedience  due  to  Saul  proceeded  from 
God's  inilitution,  it  can  extend  to  none  but  thofe 
who  are  fo  peculiarly  inftituted  and  anointed  by  his 
command,  and  the  hand  of  his  prcpliet,  which  will 
be  of  little  advantao;e  to  the  kings  that  can  in\^c  rio 

C  2  ttfli- 


20  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

tejllimony  of  fuch  an  inftltution  or  undllon ;  and  an 
indifputable  right  will  remain  to  every  nation  of 
abrogating  the  kingdoms  which  are  inftituted  by 
and  for  themfelves.  But  as  David  did  refifl:  the  au- 
thority of  Saul  and  Ifhbofheth,  without  affuming 
the  power  of  a  king,  tho'  defigned  by  God,  and 
anointed  by  the  prophet,  till  he  was  made  king  of 
Judah  by  that  tribe;  or  arrogating  to  himfelf  a 
power  over  the  other  tribes  till  he  was  made  king 
by  them,  and  had  entered  into  a  covenant  with 
them  3  'tis  much  more  certain  that  the  perfons  and 
authority  of  ill  kings,  who  have  no  title  to  the  pri- 
vileges due  to  Saul  by  virtue  of  his  inftitution,  may 
be  juflly  re  lifted  ^  w^hich  is  as  much  as  is  neceflary 
to  my  purpofe. 

Objed:.  But  *  David's  heart  fmote  him  when  he 
had  cut  off  the  fkirt  of  Saul's  garm.ent,  and  he  would 
hot  fuffcr  Abifliai  to  kill  him.  This  might  be  of 
fome  force,  if  it  were  pretended  that  every  man  was 
obliged  to  kill  an  ill  king,  whenfoever  he  could  do 
it,  which  I  think  no  man  ever  did  fay ;  and  no  man 
having  ever  affirmed  it,  no  more  can  be  concluded 
than  is  confelTcd  by  all.  But  how  is  it  poffible  that 
a  man  of  a  generou^fpirlt,  like  to  David,  could  fee 
a  great  and  valiant  king,  chofen  from  amongfl  all 
the  tribes  of  Ifrael,  anointed  by  the  command  of 
God  and  the  hand  of  the  prophet,  famous  for  vic- 
tories obtained  againft  the  enemies  of  Ifrael,  and  a 
wonderful  deliverance  thereby  purchafed  to  that 
people,  call  at  his  feet  ta  receive  life  or  death  from 
the  hand  of  one  whom  he  had  fo  furioufly  perfe- 
cuted.  and  from  whom  he  leafl:  deferved,  and  could 
leaft  expe(5t  mercy,  without  extraordinary  commo- 
tion of  mind,  mofl  efpecially  when  Abilhai,  who 

*  J  Sam.  xxvi, 

I  faw 


Sed.  r .      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       2 1 

faw  all  that  he  did,  and  thereby  ought  bell  to  have 
known  his  thoughts,  expreffed  fo  great  a  readinefs 
to  kill  him  ?  This  could  not  but  make  him  rcfle(5l 
upon  the  inftability  of  all  that  feemcd  to  be  mofl 
glorious  in  men,  and  fliew  him  that  if  Saul,  who 
had  been  named  even  among  the  prophets,  and  af- 
filed in  an  extraordinary  manner  to  accomplidi 
fuch  great  things,  was  fo  abandoned  and  given  over 
to  fury,  mifery  and  fliame ;  he  that  feerned  to  be 
moft  firmly  eftabliilied  ought  to  take  care  left  he 
fhould  fall. 

Surely  thefe  things  are  neither  to  be  thought 
ftranee  in  relation  to  Saul,  v/ho  was  God's  anointed, 
nor  communicable  to  fuch  as  are  not :  fome  may 
fuppofe  he  was  king  by  virtue  of  God's  undion  (tho* 
if  that  were  true,  he  had  never  been  chofen  and 
made  king  by  the  people)  but  it  were  madnefs  to 
think  he  became  God's  anointed  by  being  king  : 
for  if  that  were  Co,  the  fame  right  and  title  would 
belong  to  every  king,  even  to  thofe  who  by  his 
command  were  accurfed  and  deftroyed  by  his  fer- 
vants  Mofes,  Jofhua  and  Samuel.  The  fame  men, 
at  the  fame  time,  and  in  the  fame  fenfe,  would  be 
both  his  anointed  and  accurfed,  loved  and  detefted 
by  him  ;  and  the  moft  facred  privileges  made  to  ex- 
tend to  the  worft  of  his  enemies. 

Again ;  the  war  made  by  David  was  not  upon 
the  account  of  being  king,  as  anointed  by  Samuel, 
but  upon  the  common  natural  right  of  defending 
himfelf  againft  the  violence  and  fury  of  a  wicked 
man ;  he  trufted  to  the  promife,  '^  that  he  ftiould 
*^  be  king,"  but  knew  that  as  yet  he  was  not  fo : 
and  when  Saul  found  he  had  fpared  his  life,  he 
faid,  *'  I  now  know  well  that  thou  ftialt  furely  be 
''  king,  and  that  the  kingdom  of  Ifrael  fliall  furely 
*^  be  eftabliftied  in  thy  hand  "*  3"  nut  that  it  was  al- 

*   1  Sam.  xxiv. 

C  3  ready. 


22  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

already.  Nay  David  himfelf  v/as  fo  far  from  tak- 
ing upon  him  to,  be  king,  till  the  tribe  of  Judah  had 
chofen  him,  that  he  often  acknovvdedeed  Saul  to  be 
his  lord.  When  Baanah  and  Rechab  brought  the 
head  of  Ifhboflieth  to  him,  he  commanded  them  to 
be  .(lain  ;  "  becaufe  they  had  killed  a  righteous  man 
'^  upon  his  bed,  in  his  own  houfe  *;'  which  he  could 
not  have  faid,  if  liliboflieth  had  unjuftly  detained 
from  him  the  ten  tribes,  and  that  he  had  a  right  to 
reign  over  them  before  they  had  chofen  him.  The 
word  of  God  did  not  make  him  king,  but  only  fore- 
told that  he  fhould  be  king ;  and  by  fuch  w^ays  as 
he  pleafed  prepared  the  hearts  of  the  people  to  fet 
him  up  ;  and  till  the  time  defigned  by  God  for  that 
work  was  accomplifhed,  he  pretended  to  no  other 
authority,  than  what  the  fix  hundred  m.en  who  firft 
followed  him,  aftcrw^ards  the  tribe  of  Judah,  and 
at  laft  all  the  reft  of  the  people,  conferred  upon 
him. 

I  in  no  way  defend  Abfalom's  revolt  -,  he  was 
wicked,  and  aded  wickedly  -,  but  after  his  death  no 
man  was  ever  blamed  or  queftioned  for  fiding  with 
him  :  and  A  mala  who  commanded  his  army,  is  re- 
prefented  in  fcripture  as  a  good  man,  even  David  fay- 
ing, that  Joab  by  flaying  Abner  and  Amafa,  had 
killed  "^  tvv^o  mxCn  who  were  better  than  himfelf -f- ; 
whicli  could  not  have  been,  unlefs  the  people  had 
a  right  of  looking  into  matters  of  government,  and 
of  redrciling  abufes :  tho'  being  deceived  by  Abfa- 
lom,  they  fo  far  erred,  as  to  pi'efer  him,  w^ho  was 
in  all  refpeifls  wicked,  before  tb.e  man^  who,  except 
in  the  matter  of  Uriah,  is  faid  to  be  after  God's 
own  heart.  This  right  was  acknowledged  by  Da- 
vid h'mfelf,  when  he  commanded  Hufliai  to  fay 
to    Abfalom,    ''  j  1  will  be  thy  fervant  O  king  j'* 

*  2  Sam.  iv.  f  2  Sam.  xx.-  %  z  Kings. 

and 


Sea.  2.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        23 

and  by  Hufhai  in  the  following  chapter,  '^  Nav, 
''  but  whom  the  Lord  and  bis  people,  and  all  the 
'^  men  of  Ifrael  choofe,  his  will  I  be,  and  with  him 
"  will  I  abide  3"  which  could  have  no  fcnfe  in  it, 
unlefs  the  people  had  a  right  of  choofing,  and  that 
the  choice  in  which  they  generally  concurred,  was 
efteemed  to  be  from  God. 

But  if  Saul  who  was  made  king  by  the  whole 
people,  and  anointed  by  the  command  of  God, 
might  be  lawfully  reiifted  when  he  departed  from 
the  law  of  his  inilitution  -,  it  cannot  be  doubted  that 
any  other  for  the  like  reafon  may  be  refilled.  If 
David,  tho'  deligned  by  God  to  be  king,  and  anointed 
by  the  hand  of  the  prophet,  was  not  king  till  the 
people  had  chofen  him,  and  he  had  made  a  covenant 
with  them;  it  will,  if  I  miftake  not,  be  hard  to 
find  a  man  who  can  claim  a  right  which  is  not  ori- 
ginally from  them.  And  if  the  people  of  Ifrael 
could  erecl  and  pull  down,  inflitute,  abrogate,  or 
transfer  to  other  perfons  or  families,  kingdoms  more 
firmly  eftabliihed  than  any  we  know,  the  fame  right 
cannot  be  denied  to  other  nations. 

SECT.     II. 

The  kings  of  If  ael  and  "Judah  were  under  a  law  not 

jofe^.y  to  be  tranfgrejs'd, 

OUR  author  might  be  pardon'd  if  he  only  vent- 
ed his  own  follies;  but  he  aggravates  his  own 
crime,  by  imputing  them  to  men  of  more  credit ; 
and  tho'  I  cannot  look  upon  Sir  Walter  Raleigh  as  a 
very  good  interpreter  of  fcripture,  he  had  too  much 
underfcanding  to  fay,  "  That  if  practice  declare  the 
"  greatnefs  of  authority,  even  the  beft  kings  of  Ifrael 
"  and  Judah  were  not  tied  to  any  law,  but  they 
'V  did  whatfoever  they  pleafed  in  the  greatefl:  mat- 

C  4  •  ':  ters  i" 


24      '  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

^'  terSj"  for  there  is  no  fenfe  in  thofe  words.  If  prac- 
tice declares  the  greatnefs  of  authority,  even  the 
bell  were  tied  to  no  law,  fignifies  nothing,  for  prac- 
tice cannot  declare  the  greatnefs  of  authority.  Peter 
the  cruel  of  Caftiile,  and  Chrifdern  the  fecond  of 
Denmark,  kill'd  v/hom  they  pleas'd ;  but  no  man 
ever  thought  they  had  therefore  a  right  to  do  fo : 
and  if  there  was  a  law,  all  v/ere  tied  by  it,  and  the 
beft  were  lefs  likely  to  break  it  than  the  worft.  But 
if  Sir  Walter  Raleigh's  opinion"^,  which  he  calls  a 
conjedure,  be  taken,  there  was  fo  great  a  difference 
between  the  kings  of  Ifrael  and  Judah,  that  as  to 
their  general  pro.eedings  in  point-of  power,  hardly 
any  thing  can  be  faid  which  may  rightly  be  applied 
to  both  ;  and  he  there  endeavours  to  f|iow,  that  the 
reafon  w^hy  the  ten  tribes  did  not  return  to  the  houfe 
of  David,  after  the  dellrudlion  of  the  houfes  of  Je- 
roboam and  Baafha,  w^as,  becaufe  they  would  not 
endure  a  power  fo  abfolute  as  that  which  v/as  exer- 
cifed  by  the  houfe  of  David.  If  he  has  there- 
fore any  where  faid  that  the  kings  did  what  they 
Dleafed,  it  muft  be  in  the  fenfe  that  Mofes  Maimo- 
nides  fays,  the  kings  of  Ifrael  committed  many  ex- 
travagancies, becaufe  they  were  ''  -f-infolent,  impi- 
"  ous,  and  defpifexs  of  the  law."  Bat  whatfoever 
Sir  Walter  Raleigh  may  fay  (for  I  do  not  remember 
his  words,  and  have  not  leifure  to  feek  whether  any 
fuch  are  found  in  his  books)  'tis  moft  evident  that 
they  did  not  what  they  pleafed.  The  tribes  that 
did  not  fibmit  to  David,  nor  crown  him  till 
they  thought  fit,  and  then  made  a  covenant  with 
him,  took  care  it  mio;ht  be  obferved  whether  he 
would  or  not.  Abfalom's  rebellion  follow'd  by  al- 
moil  all  Ifrae],  v/as  a  terrible  check  to  his  will. 

*   2  L   L;/!.   cap.  ig. 

7  Quia  iuperbi  erani  corde,  impii,  d-  fpretores  legis.  Mor.  'Ne^^joch. 

That 


Seft.  2.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       25 

That  of  Sheba,  the  fon  of  Bichri,  was  Hke  to  havs 
been  worfe,  if  it  had  not  been  fuppreffed  by  Joab's 
diUgence  ;  and  David  often  confefled  the  fons  of 
Zerviah  were  too  hard  for  him.  Solomon  indeed 
overthrowing  the  lav/  given  by  Mofcs,  multiplying 
gold  and  filver,  wives  and  horfes,  introducing  ido- 
latry, and  lifting  up  his  heart  above  his  brethren, 
did  v/hat  he  pleafed ;  but  Rehoboam  paid  for  all : 
the  ten  tribes  revolted  from  him,  by  reafon  of  the 
heavy  burdens  laid  upon  them ;  ftoned  Adoram  who 
was  fent  to  levy  the  tributes,  and  fet  up  Jeroboam, 
who,  as  Sir  Walter  Raleigh  fays  in  the  place  before 
cited,  had  no  other  title  than  the  curtefy  of  the 
people,  and  utterly  rejefed  the  houfe  of  David.  If 
pradice  therefore  declares  a  right,  the  practice  of 
the  people  to  avenge  the  injuries  they  fuffered  from 
their  kings,  as  foon  as  they  found  a  man  fit  to  be 
their  leader,  fliews  they  had  a  right  of  doing  it. 

'Tistrue,  the  befl:  of  the  kings,  v/ith  Mofes,  Jo- 
fhua,  and  Samuel,  may  in  one  fenfe  be  faid  to  have 
done  what  they  pleafed,  becaufe  they  defired  to  do 
that  only  which  was  good.  But  this  will  hardly  be 
brought  to  confer  a  right  upon  ail  kings  :  and  I  deny 
that  even  the  kings  of  Judah  did  v/hat  they  pleafed, 
or  that  it  were  any  thing  to  ourqueflion  if  they  did. 
Zedekiah  profeflTed  to  the  great  men  (that  is,  to  the 
Sanhedrin)  ''  That  without  them  he  could  do  no- 
"  thing*."  When  Amaziah,  by  his  folly,  had 
brought  a  great  fiaughter  upon  the  tribe  of  Judah, 
they  confpired  againft  him  in  public  council  3  where- 
upon he  fled  to  Lahifh  y ,  and  they  purfuing  him 
thither,  killed  him,  avowed  the  fad:,  and  it  was 
neither  queftion'd  nor  blamed:  which  examples  agree 
with  the  paraphrafe  of  Jofephus  J  on  Deut  J7. 
"  fie  fliail  do  nothing  without  the  confent  of  the 

*  Jerem.  xxxyiii.  •[■  2  Kings  xiv.  J  Antiq.  Jud. 

I  ■vSn- 


26  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

''  Sanhedrin  ;  and  if  he  attempt  it  they  fhall  hinder 
*'  him."  This  was  the  law  of  God,  not  to  be  ab- 
rogated by  man ;  a  law  of  hberty  diredlly  oppolite 
to  the  neccfiity  of  fubmitting  to  the  will  of  a  man. 
This  was  a  gift  bellowed  by  God  upon  his  children 
and  people  -,  whereas  flavery  was  a  great  part  of  the 
ciirfe  denounced  a2;ainft  kluvn  tor  his  wickednefs, 
and  perpetually  incumbent  upon  his  pofterity.  The 
great  Sanhedrin  were  conftituted  judges,  as  Grotius 
fays,  moft  particularly  of  fuch  matters  as  concerned 
their  kings ;  and  Maimonides  affirms,  thac  the  kings 
were  judged  by  them:  the  diilribution  of  the  power 
to  the  inferior  Sanhedrins,  in  every  tribe  and  city, 
with  the  right  of  calling  the  people  together  in  ge- 
neral ^iTemblies  as  often  as  occalion  required,  were 
the  foundations  of  their  liberty ;  and  being  added 
to  the  law  of  the  kingdom  prescribed  in  the  1 7th  of 
Deuetronomy  (if  they  fliould  think  fit  to  have  a  king) 
eftablifhed  the  freedom  of  that  people  upon  a  folid 
foundation.  And  tho'  they  in  their  fury  did  in  a 
gi'eat  meafure  w^ave  the  benefits  God  had  beflowed 
upon  them ;  yet  there  was  enough  left  to  reflrain 
the  lulls  of  their  kings.  Ahab  did  not  treat  with 
Naboth  as  a  fervant,  whole  perfon  and  eflate  de- 
pended upon  his  will,  and  does  not  feem  to  have 
been  fo  tender-hearted  to  grieve  much  for  his  refufalj 
if  by  virtue  of  his  royal  authority  he  could  have 
taken  away  his  vineyard  and  his  life :  but  that  fail- 
ing,  he  had  no  other  way  of  accompli ihiiig  his  de- 
iign,  than  by  the  fraud  of  his  accurfed  wife,  and 
the  perfidious  wretches  ilie  employed.  And  no  bet- 
ter proof  that  it  did  fail,  can  realbnably  be  required, 
than  that  he  was  obliged  to  have  recourfe  to  fuch 
fordid,  odious,  and  dangerous  remedies :  but  we  are 
furniflied  with  one  that  is  more  unqueflionabie ; 

Hafl 


Sea.  3.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       27 

*«  Haft  thou  killed,  and  alfo  taken  pcffeffion  ?  In 
^'  the  place  where  dogs  licked  the  blood  of  Naboth, 
"  fliall  they  lick  thy  blood,  even  thine  ■^'\"  This 
fhews  that  tlie  kings  were  not  only  under  a  law, 
but  under  a  law  of  equality  with  the  reft  of  the 
people,  even  that  of  retaliation.  He  had  raifed  his 
heart  above  his  brethren  j  but  God  brought  him 
down,  and  made  him  to  fuffer  what  he  had  done ; 
he  was  in  all  refpcds  wicked,  but  the  juftice  of 
this  fentence  confifted  in  the  law  he  had  broken, 
which  could  not  have  been,  if  he  had  been  fubje^t 
to  none.  But  as  this  retaliation  was  the  funi  of  all 
the  judicial  law  given  by  God  to  his  people,  the 
fentence  pronounced  againft  Ahab  in  conformity  to 
it,  and  the  execution  committed  to  Jehu,  fhevj/s, 
that  the  kings  were  no  lefs  obliged  to  perform  the 
law  than  other  men,  tho'  they  were  not  fo  eafily 
punifhed  for  tranfgreiTing  it  as  others  were ;  and  if 
many  of  them  did  efcape,  it  perfedtly  agrees  with 
what  had  been  foretold  by  Samuel. 

SECT.     III. 

Samuel  did  not  defcribe  to  the  Ifraelites  the  glory  of 
a  free  monarchy  ;  but  the  evils  the  people  jhould 
fffer^  that  he  might  divert  them  frojn  dcfiring  a 
king, 

^T~^  H  C  no  reftraint  had  been  put  upon  the  lufts 
\  of  the  Hebrew  kings,  it  could  be  no  prejudice 
to  any  other  nation.  They  defiedted  from  the  law 
of  God ;  and  receding  him  that  he  ihould  reign  over 
them  no  longer,  they  fell  into  that  mifery  which  could 
affed:  none  but  thofe  who  enjoy  the  fame  bleflings, 
and  with  the  fame  fury  defpife  them.  If  their  kings 
had  more  power  than  confifted  with  their  welfare^ 


*  I  Kin2:s  xxi. 


i:>- 


thev 


2S  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

they  gave  it,  and  God  renounces  the  inftitution  of 
■*  fach.  He  gave  them  a  law  of  liberty;  and  if  they 
fell  into  the  fliame  and  mifery  that  accompanies 
ilavery,  it  was  their  own  work.  They  were  not 
obliged  to  have  any  king  -,  and  could  not  without  a 
crime  have  any  but  one,  who  niuft  not  raife  his  heart 
above  the  reft  of  them.  This  was  taught  by  Mofes  : 
and  Samuel  who  fpoke  by  the  fame  fpirit  could  not 
contradid:  him;  and  in  telling  the  people  what  fuch 
a  king  as  they  defired  would  do  when  he  fhould  be 
e;ftabiifhed,  he  did  announce  to  them  the  mifery  they 
would  bring  upon  themfelves,  by  choofmg  fuch  a 
one  as  he  had  forbidden.  This  free  monarchy, 
which  our  author  thinks  to  be  fo  majeftically  defcrib- 
ed,  was  not  only  difpleafing  to  the  prophet,  but  de- 
clared by  God  to  be  a  rejection  of  him,  and  incon- 
fiftent  with  his  reign  over  them..  This  might  have 
been  fufficient  to  divert  any  other  people  from  their 
furious  refolution  ;  but  the  prophet  farther  enforcing 
his  difluafion,  told  them,  that  God  (w^ho  had  in  all 
other  cafes  been  their  helper)  would  not  hear  them 
when  they  fhould  cry  to  him  by  reafon  of  their  kingv 
This  is  the  majeftic  defcription  of  that  free  monarchy 
with  v/hich  our  author  is  fo  much  pleafed  :  it  was 
difpleafing  to  the  prophet,  hateful  to  God,  an  aggra- 
vation of  all  the  crimes  they  had  committed  fince 
tliey  came  out  of  Egypt,  and  that  which  would 
bring  (as  it  did)  moft  certain  and  irreparable  deflruc- 
tion  upon  themfelves. 

But  it  feems  the  regal  m^ajefty  In  that  age  was  in 
its  infancy,  and  little  in  comparifon  of  that  which 
we  find  defcribed  by  Tacitus,  Suetonius,  and  others 
in  later  times.  He  fhall  take  your  fons,  fays  Samuel, 
and  fet  them  over  his  chariots,  and  your  daughters 

*  Ye  have  chofen  kings,  bat  not  by  me  ;  and  princes,  but  I  knov? 
tlicm  not.     Ho/. 

to 


Sea.  3.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        29 

to  make  them  confedlioners  and  cooks ;  but  the  ma- 
jefty  of  the  Roman  emperors  was  carried  to  a  higher 
pitch  of  glory.  Ahab  could  not,  without  employ- 
ing treachery  and  fraud,  get  a  fmall  fpot  of  ground 
for  his  money  to  make  a  garden  of  herbs :  but  Tibe- 
rius, Caligula  and  Nero  killed  whom  they  pleafed, 
and  took  what  they  pleafed  of  their  eftates.  When 
they  had  fatiated  their  cruelty  and  avarice  by  the 
murders  and  confifcations  of  the  moil:  eminent  and 
beft  men,  they  commonly  expofed  their  children  to 
the  luft  of  their  flaves.  If  the  power  of  doing 
evil  be  glorious,  the  utmoft  excefs  is  its  perfediion  ^ 
and  'tis  pity  that  Samuel  knew  no  more  of  the  etteds 
produced  by  unreftrained  luft,  that  he  might  have 
made  the  defcription  yet  more  majeftic :  and  as 
nothing  can  be  fufFer'd  by  man  beyond  conftupration, 
torments  and  death,  inftead  of  fuch  trifles  as  he 
mentioned,  he  might  have  fhew^'d  them  the  effedls 
of  fury  in  its  greateft  exaltation. 

If  it  be  good  for  a  nation  to  live  under  fuch  a 
power,  why  did  not  God  of  his  own  goodnefs  in- 
ftitute  it?  Did  his  wifdom  and  love  to  his  people  fail  ? 
Or  if  he  himfelf  had  not  {ct  up  the  beft  government 
over  them,  could  he  be  difpleafed  with  them  for 
afking  it  ?  Did  he  feparate  that  nation  from  the  reft 
of  mankind,  to  m.ake  their  condition  Vv'orfe  than 
that  of  others  ?  Or  can  they  be  faid  ta-  have 
finned  and  rejedlcd  God,  when  they  defir'd  nothing 
but  the  government,  which  by  a  perpetual  ordinance 
.  he  had  eftabliflied  over  all  the  nations  of  the  Vv'-orld  ? 
Is  not  the  law  of  nature  a  rule  which  he  has  given 
to  things  ?  and  the  law  of  man's  nature,  which  is 
reafon,  an  emanation  of  the  divine  wifdom,  or 
fome  footfteps  of  divine  light  remaining  in  us?  Is  it 
poffible  that  this  which  is  from  God,  can  be  con- 
trarv  to  his  will ;  and  can  he  be  offended  with  thofc 

who 


30  DISCO  U  R  S  E  S        Chap.  III. 

who  deiire  to  live  in  a  conformity  to  that  law  ?  Or 
could  it  juftly  be  faid,  the  people  had  chofen  that 
which  is  not  good,  if  nothing  in  government  be  good 
but  what  they  chofe  ? 

But  as  the  woril  men  delight  in  the  worft  things^ 
and  fools  are  pleafed  with  the  moft  extreme  abfur- 
dities,  he  (i.  e.  Filmer)  not  only  gives  the  higheft 
praifes  to  that  which  bears  fo  many  marks  of  God's 
hatred  3  but  after  having  faid  that  xA.braham,  Ifaac, 
Jacob,  and  Mofes  were  kings,  he  goes  on,  and  fays, 
"'  The  Ifraelites  begged  a  king  of  Samuel^"  which 
had  been  impertinent,  if  the  magiftrates  infcituted 
by  the  law  were  kings  :  and  tho'  it  might  be  a  folly 
in  them  to  aflc  what  they  had  already,  it  could  be 
no  fin  to  defire  that  which  they  enjoyed  by  the  ordi- 
nance of  God.  If  they  were  not  kings,  it  follows 
that  the  only  government  fet  up  by  God  aniongft 
men  wanted  the  principal  part,  even  the  head  and  foun- 
dation, from  whence  all  the  other  parts  have  their 
action  and  being;  that  is,  God's  law  is  againfl  God's 
law,  and  deftroys  it  felf. 

But  if  God  did  neither  by  a  general  and  perpetual 
ordinance  eftablilh  over  all  nations  the  monarchy  which 
Samuel  defcribes,  nor  prefcribe  it  to  his  own  people 
by  a  particular  com^mand,  it  was  purely  the  peoples 
creature,  the  producfrion  of  their  own  fancy,  con- 
ceived in  wickednefs,  and  brought  forth  in  iniquity, 
an  idol  fet  up  by  themfelves  to  their  own  deftrucftion, 
in  imitation  of  their  accurfed  neig-hbours  :  and  their 
reward  was  no  better  than  the  conceflion  of  an  impi- 
o.us  petition,  which  is  one  of  God's  heavieft  judg- 
ments. Samuel's  words  are  acknowledged  by  all 
interpreters,  who  were  not  malicious  or  mad,  to  be 
a  diffiaafion  from  their  wicked  purpofe  ;  not  a  de- 
fcriptioii  of  w^hat  a  king  might  juitly  do  by  virtue  of 
his  Oiiice,  but  what  thole  who  fnould  be  fet  up 


againft 


Sea.  4.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        g  i 

againil  God  aad  his  law  would  do  v/hen  they  fliould 
have  the  power  in  their  hands :  and  1  leave  fuch  as 
have  the  underftandings  of  men,  and  are  not  aban- 
doned by  God,  to  judge  what  influence  this  ought 
to  have  upon  other  nations,  either  as  to  obligation  or 
imitation. 

SECT.     IV'. 

No  people  ca?i  be  obliged  to  fuffer  Jrom  their  kings, 
what  they  have  not  a  right  to  do, 

OUR  author's  next  w^ork  is  to  tell  us,  th?.t 
''  the  fcope  of  Samuel  was  to  teach  the  people 
"  a  dutiful  obedience  to  their  king,  even  in  the 
^^  things  that  they  think  mifchievous  or  inconvenient: 
**  for  by  telling  them  what  the  king  would  do,  he 
'*'  indeed  inftrudls  them  what  a  fubje(St  muft  fuffer : 
*^  yet  not  fo  that  it  is  right  for  kings  to  do  injury, 
*'  but  it  is  right  for  them  to  go  unpunifhed  by  the 
"  people  if  they  do  it ;  fo  that  in  this  point  it  is  air 
"  one  whether  Samuel  defcribe  a  king  or  a  tyrant." 
This  is  hard,  but  the  concluiion  is  grounded  upon 
nothing.  There  is  no  relation  between  a  prediction 
that  a  thing  iliali  be  attempted  or  done  to  me,  and  a 
precept  that  I  fliall  not  defend  my  felf,  or  puniih 
the  perfon  that  attempts  or  does  it.  If  a  prophet 
fhould  fay  that  a  thief  lay  in  the  way  to  kill  me,  it 
might  reafonably  perfaade  me  not  to  go,  or  to  go  in 
fuch  a  manner  as  to  be  able  to  defend  myfelt ;  but 
can  no  way  oblige  me  to  fubmit  to  the  violence  that 
fliall  be  offer'd,  or  my  friends  and  children  not  to 
avenge  my  death  if  I  fall  %  much  lefs  can  other  men 
be  deprived  of  the  natural  right  of  defending 
themfeives  by  my  imprudence  or  obilinacy  in  not 
taking  the  warning  given,  whereby  I  might  have 
preferved  my  life.     For  every  man  has  a  right  of 

refill- 


S2  DISCOURSES  Chap.  IIL 

refifting  feme  way  or  other  that  which  ought  not 
to  be  done  to  him ;  and  tho*  human  laws  do  not  in 
all  cafes  make  men  judges  and  avengers  of  the  in- 
'  iuries  ofter'd  to  them,  I  think  there  is  none  that  does 
not  juftify  the  man  w^ho  kills  another  that  offers 
violence  to  him,  if  it  appear  that  the  way  prefcribed 
by  the  law  for  the  prefervation  of  the  innocent  can- 
not be  talcen.  This  is  not  only  true  in  the  cafe  of 
outragious  attempts  to  affaffmate  or  rob  upon  the 
hi^-hwav,  but  in  divers  others  of  lefs  m.oment.  I 
knew  a  man  who  being  appointed  to  keep  his  mailer's 
park,  killed  three  men  in  one  night  that  came  to  dc- 
ftroy  his  deer  3  and  putting  himfelf  into  the  hands  of 
the  magiftrate,  and  confefling  the  fad:  both  in  matter 
and  manner,  he  was  at  the  public  aiiizes  not  only 
acquitted,  but  commended  for  having  done  his  duty  j 
and  this  in  a  time  when  'tis  well  known  iuftice  was 
leverely  adminifcred,  and  little  favour  expedled  by 
him  or  his  matter.  Nay,  all  laws  muft  fall,  human 
focietics  that  fubfiil  by  them  be  difiblved,  and  all 
innocent  perfons  be  expofed  to  the  violence  of  the 
m.oft  wicked,  if  men  mdght  not  iuttly  defend  them- 
felves  againft  injuftice  by  their  own  natural  right, 
when  the  ways  prefcribed  by  public  authority  cannot 
be  taken. 

Our  author  may  perhaps  fay,  this  is  true  in  all 
except  the  king  :  and  I  defire  to  know  why,  if  it  be 
■  true  in  all  except  the  king,  itfliould  not  be  true  in  re- 
lation to  him?  Is  it  poffible  that  he  who  is  inftituted 
for  the  obtaining  of  juftice,  fhould  claim  the  liberty 
of  doing  iniuftice  as  a  privilege  ?  Were  it  not  better 
for  a  people  to  be  without  law,  than  that  a  power 
fhould  be  eftablillied  by  law  to  commit  all  manner 
of  violences  with  im.punity  ?  Bid  not  David  relift 
thofe  of  Saul  ?  Did  he  not  make  himfelf  head  of 
the  tribe  of  Judah^  when  they   revoked  againft  his 

fon. 


Sed.  4.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        33 

fon,  and  afterwards  of  the  ten  tribes,  that  rejeded 
his  pofterity  ?  Did  not  the  IfraeUtes  ftone  Adoram 
who  collected  the  taxes,  revolt  from  the  houfe  of 
David,  fet  up  Jeroboam  3  and  did  not  the  prophet 
fay  it  was  from  the  Lord  ?  If  it  was  from  the  Lord, 
was  it  not  good  ?  If  it  was  good  then,  is  it  not  fo 
for  ever  ?  Did  good  proceed  from  one  root  then, 
and  from  another  now  ?  If  God  had  avenged  the 
blood  of  Naboth  by  fire  from  heaven,  and  deflroy'd 
the  houfe  of  Ahab,  as  he  did  the  two  captains  and 
their  men  who  were  fent  to  apprehend  Elijah,  it 
might  be  faid,  he  referv'd  that  vengeance  to  him- 
felf ;  but  he  did  it  by  the  fvvord  of  Jehu  and  the 
army  (which  was  the  people  who  had  fet  him  up) 
for  an  example  to  others. 

But  'tis  good  to  examine  what  this  ^'  dutiful  obe- 
*[  dience"  is  that  our  author  mentions.  Men  ufual- 
ly  owe  no  more  than  they  receive.  'Tis  hard  to 
know  what  the  Ifraelites  owed  to  Saul,  David,  Jero- 
boam, Ahab  or  any  other  king,  whether  good  or 
bad,  till  they  were  made  kings :  and  the  ad:  of  the 
people  by  which  fo  great  a  dignity  was  conferr'd, 
feems  to  have  laid  a  duty  upon  them,  who  did  re- 
ceive more  than  they  had  to  give  :  fo  that  fome thing 
muft  be  due  from  them  unlefs  it  were  releas'd  by 
virtue  of  a  covenant  or  promife  made;  and  none 
could  accrue  to  them  from  the  people  afterwards, 
unlefs  from  the  merit  of  the  perfon  in  rightly  exe- 
cuting his  office.  If  a  covenant  or  promife  be  pre- 
tended, the  nature  and  extent  of  the  obligation  can 
only  be  know^n  by  the  contents  expreffed,  or  the  true 
intention  of  it.  If  there  be  a  general  form  of  co- 
venant fet  and  agreed  upon,  to  wdiich  all  nations 
muft  fubmit,  it  were  good  to  know  where  it  may 
be  found,  and  by  whofe  authority  it  is  eftabliflied, 
and  then  we  may  examine  the  fenfe  of  it.     If  no 

VoL.IL  D  fuch 


54  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill 

fuch  do  appear,  we  may  rationally  look  upon  thofe 
to  be  impoitors  v/ho  fliould  go  about  from  thence 
to  derive  a  right :  and  as  that  which  does  not  appear., 
is  as  if  it  were  not,  we  may  juftly  conclude  there  is 
no  other,  or  none  that  can  have  any  effect,  but  fuch 
as  have  been  made  by  particular  nations  with  their 
princes ;  which  can  be  of  no  force  or  obligation  to 
others,  nor  to  themfelves,  any  farther  than  accord- 
ing to  the  true  intention  of  thofe  that  made  them. 
There  is  no  fach  thing  therefore  as  a  dutiful  obedi- 
ence, or  duty  of  being  obedient,  incumbent  upon 
all  nations  by  virtue  of  any  covenant ;  nor  upon  any 
particular  nation,  unlefs  it  be  expreffed  by  a  cove- 
nant :  and  whoever  pretends  to  a  right  of  taking 
our  fons  and  daughters,  lands  or  goods,  or  to  go 
unpuniflied  if  he  do,  muft  fliow  that  thefe  things 
are  expreffed  or  intended  by  the  covenant. 

Bat  tho'  nations  for  the  moft  part  owe  nothing  to 
kingS)  till  they  are  kings,  and  that  it  can  hardly  be 
conceived,  that  any  people  did  ever  owe  fo  much  to 
a  man,  as  might  not  be  fully  repaid  by  the  honour 
and  advantages  of  fuch  an  advancement ;  yet  'tis 
poffible  that  wdien  they  are  made  kings,  they  may 
by  their  good  government  lay  fuch  obligations  upon 
their  fubjedls,  as  ought  to  be  recompenfed  by  obedi- 
'cnct  and  fervice.  I'here  is  no  mortal  creature  that 
deferves  fo  well  from  mankind,  as  a  wife,  valiant, 
diligent  and  juit  king,  who  as  a  father  cherifhes  his 
people  'y  as  a  ihepherd  feeds,  defends,  and  is  ready 
to  lay  down  his  life  for  his  flock  5  who  is  a  terror 
TO  evil-doers,  and  a  praife  to  thofe  that  do  well.  This 
is  a  glorious  prerogative,  and  he  who  has  it  is  hap« 
pv.  But  before  this  can  be  adjudged  to  belong  to 
all,  it  muil  be  proved  that  ail  have  the  virtues  that 
deferve  it ,  and  he  that  exacts  the  dutiful  obedience 
tliat  arifes  from  thein,  mull  prove  that  they  are  in 

I  him. 


gear.  4.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        55 

him.  He  that  does  this,  need  not  plead  for  impu- 
nity when  he  does  injuries  5  for  if  he  do  them,  he 
is  not  the  man  we  fpeak.  of:  not  being  fo,  he  can 
have  no  title  to  the  duty  by  human  inlHtution  or 
covenant ;  nor  by  divine  law,  fince,  as  is  already 
proved,  God  has  neither  eftablifhed  kings  over  all 
nations  by  precept,  nor  recommended  them  by  ex- 
ample, in  fetting  them  over  his  own  people.  He 
has  not  therefore  done  it  at  all  -,  there  is  no  fuch 
thing  in  nature  ;  and  nations  can  owe  nothing  to 
kings  meerly  as  kings,  but  what  they  owe  by  the 
contra 61  made  with  them. 

As  thefe  contracts  are  made  voluntarily,  without 
any  previous  obligation,  'tis  evident  men  make  them 
in  confideration  of  their  own  .good ;  and  they  can 
be  of  force  no  longer,  than  he  with  whom  they  are 
made  perform  his  part  in  procuring  it ;  and  that  if 
he  turn  the  power  which  was  given  to  him  for  the 
public  good,  to  the  public  inconvenience  and  da- 
mage, he  muft  neceffarily  lofe  the  benefit  he  was  to 
receive  by  it.  The  word  ''think"  is  fooliihly  and  af- 
fectedly put  in  by  our  author  ;  for  thofe  matters  are 
very  often  fo  evident,  that  even  the  weakeft  know 
them.  No  great  fagacity  is  required  to  under ftand 
thatjewd,  flothful,  ignorant,  falfe,  unjurt,  cove- 
tous and  cruel  princes  bring  inconveniencies  and  mif- 
chiefs  upon  nations  -,  and  many  of  them  are  fo  evi- 
dently guilty  of  fome  or  all  thefe  vices,  that  no  man 
can  be  miftaken  in  imputing  them ;  and  the  utmoft 
calamities  may  rationally  be  expedled  from  them^ 
unlefs  a  remedy  be  applied. 

But,  fays  he,  Samuel  by  telling  them  ^'  what  the 
"  king  would  do,  inftruds  them  what  the  fubjedts 
''  muft  fuffer,  and  that^'tis  right  he  (hould  go  un- 
'*  puniflied :"  but,  by  his  favour,  Samuel  fays  no 
fuch  thing ;  neither  is  it  to  be  concluded,  that  be- 

D  2  caufe 


3^  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

caufe  a  king  will  do  wickedly,  he  muft  be  fuffer'd, 
any  more  than  a  private  man,  who  (hould  take  the 
fame  refolution.     But  he  told  them,  that  '^  when  • 
''  they  fhould  cry  to  the  Lord  by  reafon  of  their 
"  king,  he  v/ould  not  hear  them/'     This  was  as 
much  as  to  fay,  their  ruin  was  unavoidable ;  and 
that,  having  put  the  power  into  the  hands  of  thofe, 
w^ho  inftead  of  protecting  w^ould  opprefs  them  -,  and 
thereby  having  provoked  God  againft  them,  fo  as  he 
would  not  hearken  to  their  cries,  they  could  have  no 
relief.     But  this  was  no  fecurity  to  the  authors  of 
their  calamity.     The  houfes  of  Jeroboam,  Baaflia 
and  Omri,  efcaped  not  unpunifhed,  tho'  the  people 
did  not  thereby  recover  their  liberty.     The  kings 
had   introduced  a  corruption  that  was  inconfiftent 
with  it.     But  they  who  could  not  fettle  upon  a  right 
foundation  to  prevent  future  mifchiefs,  could  avenge 
fuch  as  they  had  fuffered,  upon  the  heads  of  thofe 
who  had  caufed  them,  and  frequently  did  it  moft 
feverely.     The  like  befel  the  Romans,  when  by  the 
"violence  of  tyranny  all  good  order  was  overthrown, 
■  good  dlfcipline  extinguiflied,  and  the  people  corrupt- 
ed.    Ill  princes  could  be  cut  in  pieces,  and  mifchiefs 
might  be  revenged,  tho'  not  prevented.     But  'tis 
not  fo  everywhere,  nor  at  all  times  ^  and  nothing  is 
'more  irrational,  than  from  one  or  a  few  examples 
to  conclude  a  gencVal  neceffity  of  future  events. 
They  alter  according  to  circumflances :  and  as  fome 
nations  by  deftroying  tyrants  could  not  deftroy  ty- 
ranny ',  others  in  removing  the  tyrant,  have  cut  up 
tyranny  by  the  roots.     This  variety  has  been  (^^.n  in 
■  the  fame  nation  at  diff;;rent  times :  the  Romans  re- 
'  covered  their  liberty  by  expeliiryg  Tarquin  -,  but  re- 
mained Haves  noiwithfianding  the  Daughter  of  Cse- 
^far.     WJulft  the  body  of  the  people  was  uncorrupt- 
'  ed,  they  cured  the  evil  wirought  by  the  perfon,  in 

taking 


Sea.  4.       CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       37 

taking  him  away.     It.  was  no  hard  matter  to  take 
the  regal  power  that  by  one  man  had  been  enjoy 'd 
for  life,  and  to  place  it  in  the  hands  of  two  an- 
nual  magiflrates,     whilft  the  nobility  and  people 
were,  according  to  the  condition  of  that  age,  ftrong 
and  ready  to  maintain  it.     But  when  the  mifchiief 
had  taken  deeper  root  ^  when  the  beft  part  of  the 
people  had  periflied  in  the  civil  wars ;  when-  all  their 
eminent  men  had  fallen  in  battle,  or  by  the  profcrip- 
tions  ;  when  their  difcipline  was  loft,    and  virtue 
aboliflied,  the  poor  remains  of  the  diftreffed  people 
were  brought  under  the  power  of  a  mercenary  ibU 
diery,  and  found  no  relief     When  they  kill'd  one 
tyrant;  they  often  made  room  for  a  worfe  :  it  availed 
them  nothing  to  cut  off  a  rotten  branch,  whilft  the 
accurfed  root  remained,  and  fent  forth  new  fprouts 
of  the  fame  nature  to  their  deflruCtion.     Other  ge- 
nerous  nations  have  been  fubdued  beyond  a  poflibili- 
ty  of  recovery ;  and  thofe  that  are  naturally  bafe. 
Aide  into  the  like  mifery  without  the  impulfe  of  an 
exterior  power.     They  are  flaves  by  nature,    and 
have  neither  the  underftanding  nor  courage  that  is 
required  for  the  conftitution  and  management  of  a 
government  within  themfelves.     They  can  no  more 
fubfiil  without  a  mafler,  than  a  flock  without  a 
fliepherd.     They  have  no  comprehenfion  of  liberty, 
and  can  neither  dellre  the  good  thev  do  not  know, 
nor  enjoy  it  if  it  wxre  beftowed  upon  them.     They 
bear  all  burdens ;  and  whatever  they  fuffer,    they 
have  no  other  remedy  or  refuge,  than  in  the  mercy 
of   their  lord.     But  fuch  nations  as  are  naturally 
ftrong,    ftout,    and  of  good  underftanding, '  whofe 
vigour  remains  unbroken,     manners  uncorrupted, 
reputation  unblemifhed,  and  increafing  in  numbers ; 
who  neither  want  rrjen  to  make  up  fuch  armies  as 
may  defend  them  againft  foreign  or  domeftic  ene- 

D  3  mies^ 


38  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ilf. 

mies,  nor  leaders  to  head  them,  do  ordinarily  fet 
limits  to  their  patience.  They  know  how  to  pre^- 
ferve  their  hberty,  or  to  vindicate  the  violation  of  it ; 
and  the  more  patient  they  have  been,  the  more  in- 
flexible they  are  when  they  refolve  to  be  fo  no  long- 
er. Thofe  who  are  fo  foolifh  to  put  them  upon 
fuch  courfes,  do  to  their  coft  find  th.at  there  is  a 
difference  between  lions  and  affes ;  and  he  is  a  fool 
who  knows  not  that  ^'  fwords  were  given  to  men, 
that  none  might  be  llaves,  but  fach  as  know  not  how 
to  ufe  them. 

SECT.      V, 

^ke  mi/chiefs  fuff'erd  fro7n  isiicked  kings  are  fuch  as 
render  it  both  reafonable  and  jufl  Jor  all  nations 
that  have  'virtue  and  power  to  exert  both  in  re-^ 
pelling  tkeni. 

IF  our  author  deferve  credit,  we  need  not  exa- 
mine whether  nations  have  a  right  of  refifting, 
or  a  reafonable  hope  of  fucceeding  in  their  endea^ 
vours  to  prevent  or  avenge  the  mifchiefs  that  are 
feared  or  fuffered,  for  'tis  not  worth  their  pains. 
The  inconveniencies,  fays  he,  and  miferies  which 
are  reckoned  up  by  Samuel,  as  belonging  unto 
kingly  government,  were  not  intolerable,  but  fuch 
as  have  been  and  are  ftill  born  by  the  fubjeds 
free  confent  from  their  princes.  Nay  at  this  day, 
and  in  this  land,  many  tenants  by  their  tenures 
are  tied  unto  the  fame  fubjeftion,  even  linto  fub- 
'^  ordinate  and  inferior  lords."  He  is  an  excellent 
advocate  for  kin2;lv  governm.ent,  that  accounts  in- 
conveniencies  and  miferies  to  be  fbme  of  the  effen- 
tials  of  it,  which  others  efleem  to  be  only  incidents. 
Tho'  many  princes  are  violent  and  wicked,  yet  feme 

*  Ignoratqae  dates  ne  (jui%uam  forviat  enfes,         Lucan, 

have 


cc 


St'±  5.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       39 

have  been  gentle  and  juft :  tho'  many  have  brougl.t 
mifery  upon  nations,  lome  have  been  beneficial  to 
them :  and  they  who  are  efteemed  moll  ievere 
ao^ainll  monarchy,  think  the  evils  that  are  often  lu^- 
fer'd  under  that  form  of  government,  proceed  from 
the  corruption  of  it,  or  deviation  from  the  principle 
of  its  inftitution  ;  and  that  they  are  rather  to  be  im- 
puted to  the  vices  of  the  perfon,  than  to  the  thing 
itfelf  j  but  if  our  author  fpeak  truth  it  is  univerfaily 
and  eternally  naughty  inconvenience  and  mifery  be- 
long to  it. 

He  thinks  to  mend  this  by  faying,  they  are  net 
intolerable  :  but  what  is  intolerable  if  inconveniencies 
and  miferies  be  not  ?  For  what  end  can  he  think 
governments  to  have  been  eftablifhed,  unlefs  to  pre- 
vent or  remove  inconveniencies  and  miferies  r  or  how 
can  that  be  called  a  government  which  does  not  only 
permit,  but  caufe  them  ?  What  can  incline  nations 
to  fet  up  governments  ?  Is  it  that  they  may  fuffer 
inconveniencies,  and  be  brought  to  mifery  ?  or  if  it 
be  to  enjoy  happinefs,  how  can  that  fubfift  under  a 
government,  which  not  by  adion,  deflexion  or  cor- 
ruption, but  by  a  neceffity  inherent  in  it  felf,  caufes 
inconveniencies  and  miferies  ?  If  it  be  pretended  that 
no  human  conftitution  can  be  altogether  free  from 
inconveniencies ;  I  anfwer,  that  the  beft  may  to  fome 
degree  fall  into  them,  becaufe  they  may  be  corrupted ; 
but  evil  and  mifery  can  properly  belong  to  none  that 
is  not  evil  in  its  own  nature.  If  Samuel  deferve 
credit,  or  may  be  thought  to  have  fpoken  fenfe,  he 
could  not  have  enumerated  the  evils,  which  he  fore- 
faw  the  people  fhould  fuffer  from  their  kings,  nor 
fay,  that  they  fhould  cry  to  the  Lord  by  reafon  of 
them,  unlefs  they  were  in  themfelves  grievous,  and 
in  comparifon  greater  than  what  they  had  fuffer'd  or 
known  5  fince  that  would  not  have  diverted  ther^ 

-    D  4  from 


40  DISCOURSES         Chap.  HI. 

from  their  intention,  but  rather  have  confirmed 
them  in  it.  And  I  leave  it  to  oiir  author  to  fhow, 
why  any  people  Ihould  for  the  pleafure  of  one  or  a 
few  men,  eredtor  fuffer  that  v^hich  brings  more  of 
evil  w^ith  it  than  any  others. 

Moreover,  there  is  a  great  difference  between  that 
which  nations  fometimes  fuffer  under  kings,  and  that 
wliich  they  willingly  fuffer  ;  mofi:  efpecially  if  our 
author's  maxim  be  received,,  that  all  laws  are  the 
mandates  of  kines,  and  the  fubiefe  liberties  and 
privileges  no  more  than  their  gracious  concefiions ; 
for  how  patient  foever  they  are  under  the  evils  they 
fuffer,  it  m.ight  reafonably  be  believ'd  they  are  fo  be- 
caufe  they  know  not  how  to  help  it :  and  this  is 
certainly  the  cafe  of  too  many  places  that  are  known 
to  us.  Whoever  doubts  of  this,  if  he  will  not  put 
himfelf  to  the  trouble  of  going  to  Turky  or  Morocco, 
let  him  pafs  only  into  Normandy,  and  afls:  the  naked, 
barefooted  and  half-flarved  people  whether  they  are 
willing  to  fuffer  the  miferies  under  v/hich  they  groan ; 
and  whether  the  magnificence  of  Verfailles,  and  the 
pom.p  of  their  haughty  m-after,  do  any  v/ay  alleviate 
their  calamities.  If  this  alfo  be  a  matter  of  too  much 
pains,  the  wretches  that  come  hither  every  day  will 
inform  him,  that  it  is  not  by  their  ov/n  confent  they 
are  deprived  of  all  honours  and  offices  in  the 
commonwealth,  even  of  thofe,  which  by  a  corrupt 
cuftom  that  had  gained  the  force  of  a  lav/,  they 
had  dearly  bought ;  prohibited  to  exercife  any  trade  ^ 
expofed  to  the  utmoft  eifed:s  of  fraud  and  violence, 
if  tliey  refufe  to  adore  their  mafter's  idols.  They 
will  tell  him,  that  'tis  not  Vv^llingly  they  kcive  their 
lands  and  eftatesto  feek  a  fhelter  in  the  moft  remote 
parts  of  the  world  ;  but  becaufe  they  are  under  a 
force  which  they  are  not  able  to  reiift  \  and  becaufe 

one 


Sea.  5.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,       41 

one  part  of  the  nation,  which  is  enriched  with  the 
fpoils  of  the  other,  have  foohfhly  contributed  to  lay 
a  yoke  upon  them  which  they  cannot  break. 

To  what  he  fays  concerning  tenures,  I  anfwer, 
no  man  in  England  owes  any  fervice  to  his  lord,  un- 
lefs  by  virtue  of  a  contrad:  made  by  himfelf  or  his 
predeceffors,  under  which  he  holds  the  land  granted 
to  him  on  that  condition  by  the  proprietor.  There 
may  be  fomething  of  hardfhip,  but  nothing  of  in- 
juftice.  'Tis  a  voluntary  act  in  the  beginning  and 
continuance ;  and  all  men  knov/  that  what  is  done  to 
one  who  is  willing^" is  no  injury.  He  who  did  not 
like  the  conditions,  was  not  obliged  to  take  the  land  ; 
and  he  might  leave  it,  if  afterwards  he  came  to 
diflike  them.  If  any  man  fay,  the  Hke  may  be  done 
by  any  one  in  the  kingdom,  I  anfwer,  that  it  is  not 
always  true  3  the  proteftants  now  in  France  cannot 
without  extreme  hazard  go  out  of  that  country,  tho* 
they  are  contented  to  lofe  their  eftates.  'Tis  ac- 
counted a  crime,  for  which  they  are  condemned 
perpetually  to  the  gallies,  and  fuch  as  are  aiding  to 
them  to  grievous  fines.  But  before  this  be  acknow- 
ledged to  have  any  fimilitude  or  relation  to  our  dif- 
courfe  concerning  kings,  it  muft  be  proved,  that  the 
prefent  king,  or  thofe  under  whom  he  claims,  is  or 
were  proprietors  of  all  the  lands  in  England,  and 
granted  the  feveral  parcels  under  the  condition  of 
iuffering  patiently  fuch  inconveniencies  and  miferies 
as  are  above-m.entioned :  or  that  they  who  did  confer 
the  crown  upon  any  of  them,  did  alfo  give  a  propri- 
ety in  the  land  ;  v/hich  I  do  not  find  in  any  of  the 
fifteen  or  fixteen  titles  that  have  been  fince  the  coming 
in  of  the  Normans :  and  if  it  was  not  done  to  the 
firfi:  of  every  one,  it   cannot   accrue  to  the  others, 

*  Volenti  noa  fit  inj  aria, 

unlefs 


42  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

unlefs  by  fome  new  ad:  to  the  fame  purpofe,  which 
will  not  ealily  be  produced. 

It  will  be  no  lefs  difficult  to  prove  that  any  thing 
unworthy  of  free  men  is  by  any  tenures  impofed  in 
England,  unlefs  it  be  the  offering  up  of  the  wives 
and  daughters  of  tenants  to  the  luft  of  abbots  and 
monks ;  and  they  are  fo  far  from  being  willingly 
fuffer'd,  that  fince  the  dens  and  nurferies  of  thofe 
beafts  were  aboliihed,  no  man  that  fucceeds  them 
has  had  impudence  fufficient  to  exacS  the  perfor- 
mance ;  and  tho'  the  letter  of  the  law  may  favour 
them,  the  turpitude  of  the  thing  has  extinguifhed 
the  ufage. 

But  even  the  kings  of  Ifrael  and  Judah,  who 
brought  upon  the  people  thofe  evils  that  had  been 
foretold  by  Samuel,  did  not  think  they  had  a  right  to 
the  powers  they  exercifed.  If  the  law  had  given  a 
right  to  Ahab  to  take  the  beft  of  their  vineyards,  he 
might  without  ceremony  have  taken  that  of  Naboth, 
and  by  the  majeftic  power  of  an  abfolute  monarch, 
have  chaftized  the  churlifh  clown,  who  refufed  to  fell  ■ 
or  change  it  for  another :  but  for  want  of  it,  he  was 
obliged  to  take  a  very  different  courfe.  If  the  lives 
of  fubjeds  had  in  the  like  manner  depended  upon  the 
will  of  kings,  David  might  without  fcruple  have 
killed  Uriah,  rather  than  to  place  him  in  the  front 
of  the  army  that  he  might  fall  by  his  own  courage. 
The  malice  and  treachery  of  fuch  proceedings  argues 
a  defed:  of  power ;  and  he  that  ads  in  fuch  an  oblique 
manner,  fhews  that  his  adions  are  not  warranted 
by  the  law,  which  is  boldly  executed  in  the  face  of 
the  fun.  This  Ihews  the  interpretation  put  upon 
the  words,  '^  againft  thee  only  have  I  finned  *,"  by 
court-flatterers,  to  be  falfe.  If  he  had  not  linned 
againft  Bathflieba  whom  he  corrupted,  Uriah  whom 

5  Pfal.  II 


Se6l.  5.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        43 

he  caufed  to  be  killed,  the  people  that  he  fcandalized, 
and  the  law  which  he  violated,  he  had  never 
endeavoured  to  cover  his  guilt  by  fo  vile  a  fraud. 
And  as  he  did  not  thereby  fly  the  light  of  God,  but 
of  men,  'tis  evident  that  he  in  that  action  feared  men 
more  than  God. 

If  by  the  examples  of  Ifrael  and  Judah,  we  may 
judge   whether    the   inconveniencies    and    miferies 
brought  upon  nations  by  their  kings  be  tolerable  or 
intolerable,  it  ^yill  be  enough  to  confider  the  madnefs 
of  Saul's  cruelty  towards  his  fubjeds,  and  the  flaughter 
brought  upon  them  by  the  hand  of  the  Philiilines  on 
mount  Gilboa,  where  he  fell  with  the  flower  of  all 
Ifrael ;  the  civil  wars  that  happened  in  the  time  of 
David,  and  the  plague  brought  upon  the  people  by 
his  wickednefs,  the  heavy  burdens  laid  upon  them  by 
Solomon,  and  the  idolatry  favour'd  by  him ;  the 
wretched  folly  of  Rehoboam,  and  the  defedion  of  the 
ten  tribes  caufed  by  it;    the   idolatry  eflabliflied  by 
Jeroboam  and  the  kings  of  Ifrael,  and  that  of  many 
of  thofe  of  Judah  alfo :  the  frequent  wars  and  unheard 
of  flaughters  enfuing  thereupon  between  the  tribes ; 
the  daily  devaftations  of  the  country  by  all  forts  of 
ftrangers ;  the  murders  of  the  prophets ;  the  aboli- 
tion of  God's  worfhip  ;  the  defolation  of  towns  and 
and  provinces  ;  the  captivity  of  the  ten  tribes  carried 
away  into  unknown  countries  ;  and  in  the  end  the 
abolition  of  both  kingdoms,  with  the    captivity  of 
the  tribe  of  Judah,  and  the  utter  deftrudtion  of  the 
city.     It  cannot  be  faid  that  thefe  things  were  fuf- 
fer'd  under  kings,  and  not  from  or  by  them :  for  the 
defolation  of  the  cities,  people  and  country  is  in  ma- 
ny places  of  fcripture  imputed  to  the  kings  that  taught 
Ifrael  to  fin,  as  appears   by   what  was  denounced 
againft  Jeroboam,  Jehu,  Ahaz,  ManaflTeh,  Zedekiah, 
and  others  *  .     Nay  the  captivity  of  Babylon  with 

*  1   King,  xiv,     2  King,  ;;;d.     2   King,  xx, 

'  ■  the 


44  DISCOURSES        Chap,  111. 

the  evils  enfuine,  were  firft  announced  to  Hezekiah 
for  his  vanity  -,  and  Jofiah  by  the  hke,  brought  a 
^reat  llaughter  upon  himfelf  and  people.  But  if 
miichiefs  fell  upon  the  people  by  the  frailty  of  thefe^ 
who  after  David  were  the  beft,  pothing  furely  lefs 
than  the  utmoft  of  all  miferies  could  be  exped:ed 
from  fuch  as  were  fet  to  do  evil,  and  to  make  the 
nation  like  to  themfelves,  in  which  they  met  v/ith 
too  great  fuccefs. 

If  it  be  pretended  that  God's  people  living  under 
an  extraordinary  difpenfation  can  be  no  example  to 
us,  I  defire  other  hiftories  may  be  examined  ;  for  I 
confefs  I  know  no  nation  fo  great,  happy  and  prof- 
perous,  nor  any  power  fo  well  eftablifhed  that  two 
or  three  ill  kings  immediately  fucceeding  each  other, 
have  not  been  able  to  defliroy  and  bring  to  fuch  a 
condition,  that  it  appeared  the  nations  mufl  perifli, 
unlefs  the  fenates,  diets,  and  other  affemblies  of 
ftate  had  put  a  ftop  to  the  mifchief,  by  reftraining 
or  depofmg  them ;  and  tho'  this  might  be  proved 
by  innumerable  teflimonies,  I  iliall  content  myfelf 
with  that  of  the  Roman  empire,  which  perifhed  by 
the  vices,  corruption,  and  bafenefs  of  their  princes  : 
the  noble  kingdom  of  the  Goths  in  Spain  overthrown 
by  the  tyranny  of  Witza  and  Rodrigo  :  the  prefent 
il:ate  of  Spain  now  languifhing  and  threatning  ruin 
from  the  lame  caufes :  France  brought  to  the  lalT: 
degree  of  mifery  and  w^aknefs  by  the  degenerate 
races  of  Pharamond  and  Charles,  preferved  and 
reilored  by  the  virtues  of  Pepin  and  Capet ;  to  which 
mav  be  added  thofe  -of  our  own  country,  which 
are  fo  well  kriown  that  I  need  not  mention  them. 


SECT. 


cc 

cc 


Sea.  6.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       45 

SECT.     VL 

^Tis  not  good  for  fuch  natiom  as  will  have  kingSy 
tofuffer  them  to  be  glorious^  powerful  or  abounding 
in  riches, 

OU  R  author  having  hitherto  fpoken  of  all  nati- 
ons, as  born  under  a  neceffity  of  being  fubjedt 
to  abfolute  monarchy,  which  he  pretends  to  have 
been  fet  up  by  the  univerfal  and  indifpenfible  law 
of  God  and  nature,  now  feems  to  leave  to  their  dis- 
cretion, whether  they  will  have  a  king  or  not;  but 
fays,  that  thofe  ''  who  will  have  a  king,  are  bound 
"  to  allow  him  royal  maintenance,  by  providing 
"  revenues  for  the  crown  ;  fince  it  is  for  the  honour, 
profit  and  fafety  of  the  people  to  have  their  king 
glorious,  powerful,  and  abounding  in  riches." 
If  there  be  any  thing  of  fenfe  in  this  claufe,  there  is 
nothing  of  truth  in  the  foundation  or  principle  of  his 
whole  book.  For  as  the  right  and  being  of  a  father 
is  natural  or  inherent,  and  no  ways  depending  upon 
the  will  of  the  child  ;  that  of  a  king  is  fo  alfo,  if  he 
be,  and  ought  to  enjoy  the  rights  belonging  to  the 
father  of  the  people  :  and  'tis  not  lefs  ridiculous  to 
fay,  *'  thofe  who  will  have  a  king,'*  than  it  would , 
be  to  fay,  "  he  that  v/ill  have  a  father ;"  for  every 
one  mufl  have  one  whether  he  will  or  not.  But  if 
the  king  be  a  father,  as  our  author  from  thence  infers 
that  all  laws  are  from  him,  none  can  be  impofed 
upon  him ;  and  whatfoever  the  fubjedt  enjoys  is  by 
his  conceffions :  'tis  abfurd  to  fpeak  of  an  obligation 
lying  upon  the  people  to  allow  him  royal  m^ain- 
tenance,  by  providing  revenues,  fince  he  has  all  in 
himfelf,  and  they  have  nothing  that  is  not  from  him, 
•and  depending  upon  his  will.  For  this  reafon  a 
v/orthy  o;entieman  of  the  houfe  of  commons  in  the 

year 


i2' 


\ 


46  DISCOURSES        Chap.  lit 

year  1640.  deiired  that  the  bufinefs  of  the  judges, 
who  in  the  ftar-chamber  had  given  for  their  opinion 
concerning  fhip-money,  "  that  in  cafes  of  necejfTity 

the  king  might  provide  it  by  his  own  authority, 

and  that  he  was  judge  of  that  neceffity,"  might 
be  firft  examined,  that  they  might  know  whether 
they  had  any  thing  to  give,  before  they  fhould  fpeak 
of  giving.  And  as  'tis  certain^  that  if  the  fentence 
of  thofe  perjur'd  wretches  had  ftood,  the  fubjedts  of 
England  by  confequence  v/ould  have  been  found  to 
have  nothing  to  give ;  'tis  no  lefs  fure,  that  if  our 
author's  principle  concerning  the  paternal  andabfolute 
power  of  kings  be  true,  it  will  by  a  more  compen- 
dious way  appear,  that  it  is  not  left  to  the  choice  of 
any  nation,  whether  they  will  have  a  king  or  not ; 
for  they  muft  have  him,  and  can  have  nothing  to 
allow  him,   but  muft  receive  all  from  him. 

But  if  thofe  only  who  will  have  a  king,  are  bound 
to  have  one,  and  to  allow  this  royal  maintenance, 
fiich  as  will  not  have  a  king,  are  by  one  and  the 
iame  adi  delivered  from  the  neceflity  of  having  one, 
and  from  providing  maintenance  for  him ;  which 
utterly  overthrows  the  magnificent  fabric  of  pater- 
nal monarchy  -,  and  the  kings  who  were  lately  re- 
prcfented  by  our  author,  placed  on  the  throne  by 
God  and  nature,  and  endow'd  with  an  abfolute 
power  over  all,  appear  to  be  purely  the  creatures  of 
the  people,  and  to  have  nothing  but  what  is  receiv- 
ed from  tliem. 

From  hence  it  may  be  rationally  inferred,  that^he 
who  makes  a  thing  to  be,  m^akes  it  to  be  only  what 
he  pieafes.  This  aiufc  hold  in  relation  to  kings  as 
well  as  other  magiftrates ;  and  as  they  who  made 
confils,  dict'otors,  and  military  tribunes,  gave  them 
only  fuch  power,  and  for  fuch  a  time  as  beft  pleafed 

*  Qui  dat  elTe,   dat  ii^.oduni  effe. 

themfelves. 


Sea.  6.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       47 

themfelves,  'tis  impoffible  they  Aould  not  have  the 
fame  right  in  relation  to  kings,  in  making  them 
what  they  pleafe,  as  well  as  not  to  make  unlefs  they 
pleafe  5  except  there  be  a  charm  belonging  to  the 
name,  or  the  letters  that  compofe  it  -,  which  cannot 
belong  to  all  nations,  for  they  are  different  in  every 
one  according  to  the  feveral  languages. 

But,  fays  our  author,  'tis  "  for  the  honour,  pro- 
"  fit,  and  fafety  of  the  people  that  the  king  fhould 
*'  be  glorious,  powerful,  and  abounding  in  riches." 
There  is  therefore  no  obligation  upon  them,  and 
they  are  to  judge  whether  it  be  fo  or  not.  The 
fcripture  fays  plainly  the  contrary :  "  He  fliall  not 
''  multiply  filver  and  gold,  wives  and  horfes :  he 
*^  Ihall  not  lift  up  his  heart  above  his  brethren*." 
He  fhall  not  therefore  be  glorious,  powerful,  or 
abounding  in  riches.  Reafon  and  experience  teach 
us  the  fame  thing :  if  thofe  nations  that  have  been 
proud,  luxurious  and  vicious,  have  defired  by  pomp 
and  riches  to  foment  the  vices  of  their  princes,  there- 
by to  cherifh  their  ov/n  5  fuch  as  have  excelled  in 
virtue  and  good  difcipline  have  abhorred  it,  and  ex- 
cept the  immediate  exercife  of  their  office  have  kept 
their  fupreme  magiftrates  to  a  manner  of  living  little 
different  from  that  of  private  men  :  and  it  had  been 
impoffible  to  maintain  that  frugality,  in  which  the 
integrity  of  their  manners  did  chiefly  confift,  if 
they  had  fet  up  an  example  diredlly  contrary  to  it, 
in  him  who  v/as  to  be  an  example  to  others  3  or  to 
provide  for  their  own  fafety,  if  they  had  overthrown 
that  integrity  of  manners  by  which  it  could  only  be 
obtained  and  preferved.  There  is  a  neceflky  incum- 
bent upon  every  nation  that  lives  in  the  like  prin- 
ciple, to  put  a  flop  to  the  entrance  of  thofe  vices 
that  arife  from  the  fuperfluity  of  riches,  by  keeping 

*  Deut    xvii. 

their 


48  DISCOURSES         Chap.  HI. 

their  kings  in  that  honeft  poverty,  which  is  the 
mother  and  nurfe  of  modefty,  fobriety  and  all  man- 
ner of  virtue  :  and  no  man  can  deny  this  to  be  well 
done,  unlefs  he  will  affirm  that  pride,  luxury  and 
vice  is  more  profitable  to  a  nation  than  the  virtues 
that  are  upheld  by  frugality. 

There  is  another  reafon  of  no  lefs  importance  to 
thofe  nations,  v/ho  tho'  they  think  fit  to  have 
kings,  yet  defire  to  preferve  their  liberty,  which  ob- 
liges them  to  fet  limits  to  the  glory,  power  and 
riches  of  their  kings ;  and  that  is,  that  they  can  no 
otherwife  be  kept  v/ithin  the  rules  of  the  law.  Men 
are  naturally  propenfe  to  corruption ;  and  if  he 
whofe  will  and  intereft  it  is  to  corrupt  them,  be  fur- 
nished with  the  means,  he  will  never  fail  to  do  it. 
Pov/er,  honours,  riches,  and  the  pleafures  that  at- 
tend them,  are  the  baits  by  which  men  are  drawn 
to  prefer  a  perfonal  intereft  before  the  public  good  ; 
and-the  number  of  thofe  v/ho  covet  them  is  fo  great, 
that  he  who  abounds  in  them  will  be  able  to  gain  fo 
many  to  his  fervice  as  fhall  be  fufficient  to  fubdue 
the  reft.  'Tis  hard  to  find  a  tyranny  in  the  world 
that  has  not  been  introduced  this  v/ay ;  for  no  man 
bv  his  own  ftrensith  could  ever  fubdue  a  multitude  : 
none  could  ever  bring  many  to  be  fubfervient  to  his 
ill  defigns,  but  by  the  rewards  they  received  or  hoped. 
By  this  means  Csfar  accompHihed  his  work,  and 
overthrew  the  liberty  of  his  countr}^,  and  with  it 
all  that  was  then  good  in  the  world.  They  who 
were  corrupted  in  their  m^inds,  defired  to  put  all  the 
power  and  riches  into  his  hands,  that  he  might  dif- 
tribute  them  to  fuch  as  ferved  him.  And  he  who 
was  nothing  lefs  than  covetous  in  his  own  nature, 
defired  riclies,  that  he  might  gain  followers ;  and 
by  the  plunder. of  Gaul  he  corrupted  thofe  that  be- 
tray'd  Ro;aie  to  him.  And  tho'  I  do  not  delight  to 
4  fpeak 


Sea.  6.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        49 

peak  of  the  affairs  of  our  own  time,  I  defire  thof^ 
who  know  the  prefent  ftate  of  France  to  tell  me, 
whether  it  were  poflible  for  the  king  to  keep  that 
nation  under  fervitude,  if  a  vaft  revenue  did  not  en- 
able him  to  gain  fo  many  to  his  particular  fervice  as 
are  fufficient  to  keep  the  reft  in  fubjedlion  :  and  if 
this  be  not  enough,  let  them  confider  whether  all 
the  dangers  that  now  threaten  us  at  home,  do  not 
proceed  from  the  madnefs  of  thofc  who  gave  fuch 
a  revenue,  as  is  utterly  unproportionable  to  the 
riches  of  the  nation,  unfuitable  to  the  modefl  beha- 
viour expelled  from  our  kings,  and  which  in  time 
will  render  parliaments  unneceffary  to  them. 

On  the  other  hand,  the  poverty  and  iimplicity  of 
the  Spartan  kings  was  no  lefs  fafe  and  profitable  to 
the  people,  than  truly  glorious  to  them.  Agefilaus 
denied  that  Artaxerxes  was  greater  than  he,  unlefs 
he  were  more  temperate  or  more  valiant ;  and  he 
made  good  his  words  fo  well,  that  without  any 
other  afliftance  than  what  his  wifdom  and  valour 
did  afford,  he  ifruck  fuch  a  terror  into  that  great, 
rich,  powerful  and  abfolute  monarch,  that  he  did 
not  think  himfelf  fafe  in  Babylon  or  Ecbatan,  till 
the  poor  Spartan  was,  by  a  captain  of  as  great  valour, 
and  greater  poverty,  obliged  to  return  from  Afia  to 
the  defence  of  his  ovv^n  country.  This  was  not  pe- 
culiar to  the  fevere  Laconic  difcipline.  When  the 
Roman  kings  were  expelled,  a  few  carts  were  pre- 
pared to  tranfport  their  goods  :  and  their  lands  which 
were  confecrated  to  Mars, .  and  now  go  under  the 
name  of  Campus  Martins,  hardly  contain  ten  acres 
of  ground.  Nay  the  kings  of  Ifrael,  who  led  fuch 
vafl  armies  into  the  field  (that  is,  w^re  followed  by 
all  the  people  who  v/ere  able  to  bcdr  arms)  feem  to 
have  poffeffed  iittle.  Ahab,  one  of  the  moil  power- 
ful, was  fo  fond  of  Naboth's  vineyard  (vv  hich  being 

Vol,  IL  .  E       '  the 


50  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

the  inheritance  of  his  fathers,  according  to  their 
equal  divifion  of  lands,  could  not  be  above  two  acres) 
that  he  grew  fick  when  it  was  refufed. 

But  if  an  allowance  be  to  be  made  to  every  king, 
it  mult  be  either  according  to  an  univerfal  rule  or 
ilandard,  or  mull:  depend  upon  the  judgment  of 
nations.  If  the  firf!:,  they  who  have  it,  may  do 
well  to  produce  it ;  if  the  other,  every  nation  pro- 
ceeding according  to  the  meafure  of  their  own  dif- 
cretion,  is  free  from  blame. 

It  may  alfo  be  worth  obfervation,  whether  the 
revenue  given  to  a  king  be  in  fuch  manner  com- 
mitted to  his  care,  that  he  is  obliged  to  employ  it 
for  the  public  fervice  without  the  power  of  aliena- 
tion ;  or  whether  it  be  granted  as  a  propriety,  to  be 
fpent  as  he  thinks  fit.  When  fome  of  the  antient 
Jews  and  Chriftians  fcrupled  the  payment  of  tribute 
to  the  emperors,  the  reafons  alledged  to  perfuade 
them  to  a  compliance,  feem  to  be  grounded  upon  a 
fuppofition  of  the  hrft :  for,  faid  they,  the  defence 
of  the  Hate  lies  upon  them,  which  cannot  be  per- 
form'd  without  armies  and  garifons  3  thefe  cannot 
be  maintained  without  pay,  nor  money  raifed  to 
pay  them  without  tributes  and  cuftoms.  This  carries 
a  face  of  reafon  vvith  it,  efpecially  in  thofe  countries 
which  are  perpetually  or  frequently  fubjeft  to  inva=- 
fions ;  but  this  will  not  content  our  author.  He 
Tpeaks  of  employing  the  revenue  in  keeping  his 
houie,  and  looks  upon  it  as  a  propriety  to  be  fpent 
a^  he  thinks  convenient ;  which  is  no  lefs  than  to 
caii  it  into  a  pit,  of  which  no  man  ever  knew  th© 
.bottom.  That  which  is  given  in  one  day,  is  fquan- 
dred  away  the  next :  the  people  is  always  opprefs'd 
with  impofitions,  to  foment  the  vices  of  the  court : 
thefe  daily  increaling,  they  grow  infitiable,  and  the 
mikrable  nations  are  compelled  to  hard  labour  in 

I  order 


Sea,  6.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        51 

order  to  fatiate  thofe  lufts  that  tend  to  their  own 

ruin. 

It  may  be  confider'd  that  the  virtuous  *  Pagans, 
by  the  light  of  nature,  difcovered  the  truth  of  this. 
Poverty  grew  odious  in  Rome,  when  great  men  by 
defiring  riches  put  a  value  upon  them,  and  introduc- 
ed that  pomp  and  luxury  which  could  not  be  borne 
by  men  of  fmall  fortunes.  From  thence  all  furies  and 
mifchiefs  feem'd  to  break  loofe :  the  bafe,  flavifli,  and 
fo  often  fubdued  Aira,  by  the  bafeft  of  men  revenged 
the  defeats  they  had  received  from  the  braveft ;  and 
by  infufing  into  them  a  delight  in  pomp  and  luxury, 
in  a  ihort  time  rendred  the  ftrongeft  and  braveft  of 
nations  the  weakeft  and  bafeft.  I  wifh  our  own 
experience  did  not  too  plainly  manifeft,  that  thefe 
evils  were  never  more  prevalent  than  in  our  days, 
when  the  luxury,  majeftic  pom.p,  and  abfolute 
power  of  a  neighbouring  king  muft  be  fupported  by 
an  abundance  of  riches  torn  out  of  the  bowels  of 
his  fubjeds,  which  renders  them,  in  the  bell  coun- 
try of  the  Vv^orld,  and  at  a  time  when  the  crown 
moft  flourifhes,  the  pooreft  and  miojft  miferable  of 
all  the  nations  under  the  fun.  We  too  well  know 
who  are  moft  apt  to  learn  from  them,  and  by  what 
means  and  fteps  they  endeavour  to  lead  us  into  the 
like  mifery.  But  the  bird  is  fafe  when  the  fnare  is 
difcover'd  ;  and  if  we  are  not  abandoned  by  God  to 
deftru6tion,  v/e  ftiall  never  be  brought  to  confent  to 
the  fettling  of  that  pomp,  which  is  againft  the  prac- 
tice of  all  virtuous  people,  and  has  brought  all  the 
nations  that  have  been  taken  with  it  into  the  ruia 
that  is  intended  for  us. 

*  ^sevior  armis 

Luxuria  incabuit,  viilumque  ulcifcitur  crbem. 
Nullum  crimen  abeft,  facinufque  lib'dinib,  ex  quo 
Paapertas  Romana  perit.  Ju^jenal.     Sat.  6.  292. 

E  2  SECT. 


-■''t> 


<c 
cc 
cc 
cc 
<c 
<c 


52  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IH, 

SECT.      VII. 

PFhcn  the  liraelites  {ijkcdfor  fuch  a  king  as  the  nations 
about  them  bad,  they  ajkedjor  a  tyrant y  thd  they 
did  not  call  him  Jo. 

O  W  that  Saul  was  no  tyrant,"  fays  our 
author,  "  note,  that  the  people  afked  a 
king  as  all  nations  had :  God  anfwers,  and  bids 
''  Samuel  to  hear  the  voice  of  the  people  in  all  things 
which  they  fpake,  and  appoint  them  a  king. 
They  did  not  alk  a  tyrant ;  and  to  give  them  a 
tyrant  when  they  afked  a  king,  had  not  been  to 
hear  their  voice  in  all  things,  but  rather  when  they 
afked  an  egg  to  have  given  them  a  fcorpion  5 
unlefs  we  will  fey  that  all  nations  had  tyrants." 
But  before  he  drew  fuch  a  conclufion,  he  fliould 
have  obferved,  that  God  did  not  give  them  a  fcorpion 
when  they  afked  an  egg,  but  told  them  that  was  a 
fcorpion  which  they  called  an  egg:  they  would  have 
a  king  to  judge  them,  to  go  out  before  them,  and 
to  fight  their  battels :  but  God  in  effedt  told  them 
Jie  would  overthrow  all  juftice,  and  turn  the  power 
that  was  given  him,  to  the  ruin  of  them  and  their 
pofterity.  But  iince  they  would  have  it  fo,  he  com- 
manded Samuel  to  hearken  to  their  voice,  and  for 
the  punifhment  of  their  fin  and  folly,  to  give  them 
fuch  a  king  as  they  aik.ed,  that  is,  one  who  would 
turn  to  his  own  profit  and  their  mifery,  the  power 
with  which  he  fhould  be  entrufted  y  and  this  truly 
denominates  a  tyrant.  Ariftotle  makes  no  other 
diftintflion  between  a  king  and  a  tyrant,  than  that  the 
king  governs  for  the  good  of  the  people,  the  tyrant 
for  his  own  pleafure  and  profit :  and  they  who  afked 
fuch  a  one,  afked  a  tyrant,  tho'  they  called  him  a 
king.     This  is  all  could  be  done  in  their  language : 

for 


Sea.  7.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       53 

for  as  they  who  are    ikilled  in  the  oriental  tongues 
affure  me,  there  is  no  name  for    a    tyrant   In  any 
of  them,    or   any    otlier    way   of  expreffing    the 
thin^^   than  by  circumlocution,  and  adding  proud, 
infolent,      luftful,     cruel,     violent,    or     the     like 
epithets,  to  the  word  lord,  or  king.     They  did  in 
effedl  afk  a  tyrant :   they   would  not  have  fuch  a 
king  as  God  had  ordain'd,  but  fuch  a  one  as  the  nati- 
ons had.     Not  that  all  nations  had  tyrants;  but  thofe 
who  were  round  about  them,  of  whom  they  had 
knowledge,  and  which  in  their  manner  of  fpeaking 
went  under  the  name  of  all,  were  blelTed  with  fuch 
mafters.     This  way  of  expreffion  was  ufed  by  Lot's 
daughters,  who  faid,  there  was  not  a  man  in  all  the 
earth  to  come  in  to  them  ;   becaufe  there  was  none 
in  the  neighbourhood,  with  whom  it  was    thought 
fit  they  fhould  accompany.     Now,  that  the  eaflern 
nations  were  then,  and  are  ftill  under  the  govern- 
ment of  thofe  which  all  free  people  call  tyrants,  is 
evident  to  all  men.     God  therefore  in  giving  them  a 
tyrant,  or  rather  a  government  that  would  turn  into 
tyranny,  gave  them  what  they  ajfked  under  another 
name;  and  without  any  blemidi  to  the  mercy  promif- 
ed  to  their  fathers,  fuffered  them  to  bear  the  penalty 
of  their  wickednefs  and  foily  in  rejed:ing  him  that 
he  fhould  not  reign  over  them. 

But  tho'  the  name  of  tyrant  was  unknown  to  them, 
yet  in  Greece,  from  whence  the  word  comes,  it 
fignified  no  more  than  one  who  governed  according 
to  his  own  will,  diftinguiflied  from  kings  that  go- 
verned by  lav/ ;  and  was  not  taken  in  an  ill  fenfe, 
till  thofe  who  had  been  advanced  for  their  iuftice, 
wifdom  and  valour,  or  their  defcendants,  were  found 
to  depart  from  the  ends  of  their  inflitution,  and  to 
turn  that  power  to  the  opprefTion  of  the  people, 
which  had  been  given  for  their  protedion  :  but  by 

E  3  thefe 


54  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

thefe  means  it  grew  odious,  and  that  kind  of  govern- 
ment came  to  be  thought  only  tolerable  by  the  bafeft 
of  men;  and  thofe  who  deftroy'd  it,  were  in  all  places 
efteemed  to  be  the  beft. 

If  monarchy  had  been  univerfally  evil,  God  had 
not  in  the  i7tli  of  Deuteronomy  given  leave  to  tl>e 
Ifraelites  to  fet  up  a  king;  and  if  that  kind  of  king 
'had  been  afked,  he  had  not  been  difpleafed  :  and 
they  could  not  have  been  faid  to  re]ed:  God,  if  they 
had  not  aflied  that  which  was  evil ;  for  nothing  that 
is  good  is  contrary,  or  inconfiftent  with  a  peoples 
obedience  to  him.  The  monarchy  they  afked  was 
difpleafmg  to  God,  it  w^as  therefore  evil.  But  a  tyrant 
is  no  more  than  an  evil  or  corrupted  monarch  :  the 
king  therefore  that  they  demanded  was  a  tyrant :  God 
in  granting  one  who  would  prove  a  tyrant,  gave 
them  what  they  afked  -,  and  that  they  might  know 
what  they  did,  and  what  he  would  be,  he  told  them 
they  rejedted  him,  and  fhould  cry  by  realbn  of  the 
king  they  defired. 

This  denotes  him  to  be  a  tyrant:  for  as  the  govern- 
ment of  a  king  ought  to  be  gentle  and  eafy,  tending 
to  the  good  of  the  people,  refembling  the  tender 
care  of  a  father  to  his  family ;  if  he  who  is  fet  up 
to  be  a  king,  and  to  be  like  to  that  father,  do  lay  a 
tieavy  yoke  upon  the  people,  and  ufe  them  as  flaves 
and  not  as  children,  he  muft  renounce  all  refem-^ 
blance  of  a  father,  and  be  accounted  an  enemy. 
*^  But,"  fays  our  author,  "  v\^hereas  the  peoples 
crying  argues  fom^e  tyrannical  oppreflion,  we  may 
remember  that  the  peoples  cries  are  not  always  an 
^^  ar2:ument  of  their  livini^  under  a  tvrant.  No  man 
^'  will  fay  Solomon  was  a  tyrant,  yet  all  the  congre- 
^^  gation  complained  that  Solomon  made  their  yoke 
*^  grievous."  'Tis  ftrange,  that  v/hen  children^  nay 
v/hcn  w^helps  cry^  it  ihould  be  accounted  ^  mark 

that 


Seft.  7.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.   ^    55 

that  they  are  troubled,  and  that  the  cry  of  the  whole 
people  fliould  be  none :  or  that  the  government 
which  is  ered:ed  for  their  eafe,  fliould  not  be  efleemed 
tyrannical  if  it  prove  grievous  to  thofe  it  fliould  re- 
lieve. But  as  1  know  no  example  of  a  people  that 
did  generally  complain  without  caufe,  our  adveiiaries 
muft  alledge  fome  other  than  that  of  Solomon, 
before  I  believe  it  of  any.  We  are  to  fpeak  reverently 
of  him  :  he  was  excellent  in  wifdom  ;  he  built  the 
temple,  and  God  appeared  tv^ice  to  him :  but  it 
muft  be  confefs'd,  that  during  a  great  part  of  his 
life  he  a6ted  diredtly  contrary  to  the  law  given  by 
God  to  kings,  and  that  his  ways  were  evil  and  op- 
preffive  to  the  people,  if  thofe  of  God  were  good. 
Kings  were  forbidden  to  multiply  horfes,  wives, 
filver  and  gold  :  but  he  brought  together  more  filver 
and  gold,  and  provided  more  horfes,  wives  and  con- 
cubines than  any  man  is  known  to  have  had  :  and 
tho'  he  did  not  adiually  return  to  Egypt,  yet  he  in- 
troduced their  abominable  idolatry,  and  fo  far  raifed 
his  heart  above  his  brethren,  that  he  made  them  fub- 
fervient  to  his  pomp  and  glory.  The  people  might 
probably  be  pleafed  with  a  great  part  of  this ;  but 
when  the  yoke  became  grievous^  and  his  foolifh  fon 
would  not  render  it  more  eafy,  they  threw  it  off; 
and  the  thing  being  from  the  Lord,  it  was  good,  unlefs 
he  be  evil. 

But  as  juft  governments  are  eflabliilied  for  the  good 
of  the  governed,  and  the  Ifraelites  defir'd  a  king, 
that  it  might  be  well  with  them,  not  with  him, 
who  was  not  yet  known  to  them;  that  which  exalts 
one  to  the  prejudice  of  thofe  that  made  him,  muft 
always  be  evil,  and  the  people  that  fuffers  the  pre- 
judice muft  needs  know  it  better  than  any  other.  He 
that  denies  this,  may  think  the  ftate  of  France  might 
have  been  beft  known  from  Bulion  the  late  treafurer, 

E  4  who 


^6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

who  finding  Lewis  the  thirteenth  to  be  troubled  at 
the  peoples  mifery,  told  him  they  were  too  happy, 
lincethey  were  not  reduced  to  eat  grafs.  But  if  words 
are  to  beunderfloodastheyare  ordinarily  ufed,  and  we 
have  no  other  than  that  of  tyranny  to  exprefs  a  mo- 
narchy that  is  either  evil  in  the  inftitution,  or  fallen 
into  corruption,  we  may  juftly  call  that  tyranny 
which  the  fcripture  calls  a  grievous  yoke,  and  which 
neither  the  old  nor  the  new  counfellors  of  Rehoboam 
could  deny  to  be  fo  :  for  tho'  the  firfl:  advifed  him 
to  promife  amendment,  and  the  others  to  do  worfe, 
yet  all  agreed  that  what  the  people  faid  was  true. 

This  yoke  is  always  odious  to  fuch  as  are  not  by 
natural  ftupidity  and  bafenefs  fitted  for  it ;  but  thofe 
who  are  fo,  never  complain.  An  afs  will  bear  a 
multitude  of  blows  patiently,  but  the  lead  of  them 
drives  a  lion  into  rage.  Fie  that  faid,  the  rod  is 
made  for  the  back  of  fools,  confefied  that  opprefilon 
will  make  a  wife  man  mad.  And  the  moft  unnatu- 
ral of  all  opprefiions  is  to  ufe  lions  like  afies,  and 
to  lay  that  yoke  upon  a  generous  nat'on,  which  only 
the  bafeft  can  deferve^  and  for  want  of  a  better  word 
wc  call  this  tyranny. 

Our  author  is  not  contented  to  vindicate  Solomon 
only,  but  extends  his  indulgence  to  Saul.  His  cufiom 
is  to  patronize  all  that  is  deteitable,  and  no  better 
teftimony  could  be  given  of  it.  "  It  is  true,  fays  he, 
^'  Saul  loft  his  kingdom,  but  not  for  being  too  cruel 
^'  or  tyrannical  unto  his  fubjeds,  but  for  being  too 
^'  merciful  unto  his  enemies :"  but  he  alledges  no 
other  reafon,  than  that  the  flaughter  of  the  priefis 
is  not  blamed  ;  not  obferving  that  the  writers  of  the 
fcripture  in  relating  thofe  things  that  are  known  to 
be  abominable  by  the  light  of  nature,  frequently 
fay  no  more  of  them  :  and  if  this  be  not  fo,  Lot's 
drunkennefs  and  inceft,    Reuben  s  pollution  of  his 

father's 


Sea.  7.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        ^^ 

father's  bed,  Abimelech's  flaughter  of  his  feventy 
brothers,  and  many  of  the  moft  wicked  ads  that 
ever  were  committed,  may  pafs  for  laudable  and  in- 
nocent.    But  if  Saul  were  not  to  be  blamed  for  kill- 
ing the  priefts,  why  was  David  blamed  for  the  death 
of  *  Uriah  ?    Why    v/ere    the  dogs  to   lick    the 
blood  of  Ahab  and  Jezebel,  if  they  did  nothing 
more  than  kings  might  do  without  blame  ?  Now  if 
the  flaughter  of  one  man  was  fo  feverely  aveno-ed 
upon  the  authors  and  their  families,  none  but  fuch 
as  Filmer  can  think  that  of  fo  many  innocent  men 
with  their  wives  and  children,  could  efcape  unrc- 
proved  or  unpunished.     But  the  whole  feries  of  the 
hiftory  of  Saul  ihewing  evidently  that  his  life  and 
reign  were  full  of  the  moft  violent  cruelty  and  mad- 
nefs,  we  are  to  feek  no  other  reafon  for  the  ruin 
threatned   and   brought  upon  him  and  his  family. 
And    as  thofe  princes    who  are  m.oft    barbaroufly 
favage  againft  their  own  people,  are  ufually  moft 
gentle  to  the  enemies  of  their  country,  he  could  not 
give  a  more  certain  teftimony  of  his  hatred  to  thofe 
he  ought  to  have  protedled,  than  by  prefervino-  thofe 
nations,  who  were  their  moft  irreconcileable  enemies. 
This  is  proved  by  reafon  as  w^ell  as  by  experience ; 
for  every  man  knows  he  cannot  bear  the  hatred  of 
all  mankind :     fuch  as   know   they   have  enemies 
abroad,  endeavour  to  get  friends  at  home :    thofe 
who  command  powerful  nations,  and  are  beloved 
by  them,  fear  not  to  offend  ftrangers.     But  if  they 
have  rendred  their  own  people  enemies  to  them, 
they  cannot  hope  for  help  in  a  time  of  diftrefs,  nor 
fo  much  as  a  place  of  retreat  or  refuge,  unlefs  from 
ftrangers,  nor  from  them  unlefs  they  deferve  it,  by 
favouring  them  to  the  prejudice  of  their  own  coun- 

*  Thou  haft   killed  Uriah   with  the  fword  of  the  children  of  /m- 
jnon :  now  therefore  the  fword  ihali  n^ver  depart  from  thy  houfe. 

2  Bam.  xii. 

try. 


58  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

try.  As  no  man  can  ferve  two  mafters,  no  man 
can  purfue  two  contrary  interefts :  Mofes,  Jofliua, 
Gideon  and  Samuel,  were  fevere  to  the  Amorites, 
Midianites  and  Canaanites,  but  mild  and  gentle  to 
the  Hebrews.  Saul,  who  was  cruel  to  the  Hebrews, 
fpared  the  Amalekites,  whofe  prefervation  was  their 
deftrudtion :  and  whilil  he  deftroyed  thofe  he  fhould 
have  faved,  and  faved  thofe  that  by  a  general  and 
particular  command  of  God  he  fhould  have  deflroy- 
ed,  he  lofl  his  ill-govern  d  kingdom,  and  left  an  ex- 
ample to  pofterity  of  the  end  that  may  be  expeGed 
from  pride,  folly  and  tyranny. 

The  matter  would  not  be  much  alter'd,  if  I  fliould 
confefs,  that  in  the  time  of  Saul  all  nations  were 
governed  by  tyrants  (tho'  it  is  not  true,  for  Greece 
did  then  flourifli  in  liberty,  and  we  have  reafon  to 
believe  that  other  nations  did  fo  alfo)  for  tho'  they 
might  not  think  of  a  good  government  ^t  the  firft, 
nothing  can  oblige  men  to  continue  under  one  that 
is  bad,  when  they  difcover  the  evils  of  it,  and  know 
how  to  mend  it.     They  who  trufted  men  that  ap- 
peared to  have  great  virtues,  with  fuch  a  power  as 
might  ealily  be  turned  into  tyranny,  might  juftly 
retract,  limit  or  abolifli  it,  when  they  found  it  to  be 
abufed.      And  tho'  no  condition  had  been  referved, 
the  public  good,  which  is  the  end  of  all  *  govern- 
ment, had  been  fafficient  to  abrogate  all  that  fliould 
tend  to  the  contrary.     As   the  malice  of  men  and 
their  inventions  to  do  mifchief  increafe  dailv,  all 
would  foon  be  brought  under  the  power  of  the 
worft,  if  care  were  not  taken,  and  opportunities  em- 
braced to  find  nevv  ways  of  preventing  it.     He  that 
fhould  make  war  at  this  day  as  the  befl  command- 
ers did  two  liundred  years  pafl,  would  be  beaten  by 
the  meanefl  foldier.    The  places  then  accounted  im- 

*  Saks  populi  fapremalex. 

pregnable 


Std:.  7.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       59 

pregnable  are  now  flighted  as  indefenfible ;'  and  if  ■ 
the  arts  of  defending  were  not  improved  as  well  as 
thofe  of  affaulting,  none  would  be  able  to  hold  out 
a  day.  Men  were  fent  into  the  world  rude  and  ig- 
norant, and  if  they  might  not  have  ufed  their  na- 
tural faculties  to  find  out  that  which  is  good  for 
themfelves,  all  muft  have  been  condemn'd  to  con- 
tinue in  the  ignorance  of  our  firfl  fathers,  and  to 
make  no  ufe  of  their  underltanding  to  the  ends  for 
which  it  was  given. 

The  beflial  barbarity  in  which  many  nations/' 
efpecially  of  Africa,  America  and  Afia,  do  now  live, 
fhews  what  human  nature  is,  if  it  be  not  improved 
by  art  and  difcipline  -,  and  if  the  firft  errors,  com- 
mitted through  ignorance,  might  not  be  correfled, 
all  would  be  obliged  to  continue  in  them,  and  for 
any  thing  I  know,  we  mufl  return  to  the  religion, 
manners  and  policy  that  were  found  in  our  country 
at  Csefar's  landing.  To  affirm  this  is  no  lefs  than 
to  deftroy  all  that  is  commendable  in  the  world, 
and  to  render  the  underflanding  given  to  men  utterly 
ufelefs.  But  if  it  be  lawful  for  us  by  the  ufe  of 
that  underflanding  to  build  houfes,  fhips  and  forts 
better  than  our  anceftors,  to  make  fuch  arms  as  are 
mofl  fit  for  our  defence,  and  to  invent  printing,  with 
an  infinite  num.ber  of  other  arts  beneficial  to  man- 
kind, why  have  w^e  not  the  fame  right  in  matters  of 
government,  upon  which  all  others  do  almofl  abfo- 
lutely  depend  ?  If  m.en  are  not  obliged  to  live  in 
caves  and  hollow  trees^  to  eat  acorns,  and  to  go  nak- 
ed, why  (hould  they  be  for  ever  obliged  to  conti- 
nue under  the  fame  form  of  government  that  their 
anceftors  happened  to  fet  up  in  the  time  of  their 
ignorance  ?  Or  if  they  were  not  fo  ignorant  to  fet 
up  one  that  was  not  good  enough  for  the  age  in 
which  tbey  lived,    why  fliould  it  not  be  altered, 

v^hen 


6o  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

when  tricks  are  found  out  to  turn  that  to  the  preju- 
dice of  nations,  which  was  ered:ed  for  their  good  ? 
From  whence  fhould  malice  and  wickednefs  gain  a 
privilege  of  putting  new  inventions  to  do  mifchief 
every  day  in  pradlice  ?  and  who  is  it  that  fo  far  pro- 
ted:s  them,  as  to  forbid  good  and  innocent  men  to 
find  new  ways  alfo  of  defending  themfelves  from  it? 
If  there  be  any  that  do  this,  they  muft  be  fuch  as 
live  in  the  fame  principle ;  who  whiift  they  pretend 
to  exercife  juftice,  provide  only  for  the  indemnity 
of  their  own  crimes,  and  the  advancement  of  un- 
juft  defigns.  They  would  have  a  right  of  attacking 
us  with  all  the  advantages  of  the  arms  now  in  ufe, 
and  the  aits  which  by  the  praftice  of  fo  many  ages 
have  been  wonderfully  refined,  whiift  we  fliould  be 
obliged  to  imploy  no  others  in  our  juft  defence,  than 
fuch  as  were  known  to  our  naked  anceftors  when 
CsBfar  invaded  them,  or  to  the  Indians  when  they 
fell  under  the  dominion  of  the  Spaniards.  This 
would  be  a  compendious  way  of  placing  uncon- 
trol'd  iniquity  in  all  the  kingdoms  of  the  world, 
and  to  overthrow  all  that  deferves  the  name  of  good 
by  the  introdudion  of  fuch  accurfed  maxims.  But 
if  no  man  dares  to  acknowledge  any  fuch,  except 
thofe  whofe  acknowledgement  is  a  difcredit,  we 
ought  not  to  fuffer  them  to  be  obliquely  obtruded 
upon  us,  nor  to  think  that  God  has  fo  far  abandon- 
ed us  into  the  hands  of  our  enemies,  as  not  to  leave 
us  the  liberty  of  ufing  the  fame  arms  in  our  defence 
as  they  do  to  offend  and  injure  us. 

We  iliall  be  told,  that  prayers  and  tears  were  the 
only  arms  of  the  firft  Chriftians,  and  that  Chrift 
commanded  his  difciples  to  pray  for  thofe  that  per- 
fecuted  them  :  but  befides  that  thofe  precepts  of  the 
moft  extreme  lenity  do  ill  fuit  with  the  violent  prac- 
tices of  thofe  who  attempt  to  enflave  nations,  and 

whg 


Sta.  8.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      6i 

who  by  alledging  them  do  plainly  fliew  either  that 
they  do  not  extend  to  all  Chriftians,  or  that  they 
themielves  are  none  vvhilft  they  ad:  contrary  to  them, 
they  are  to  know,  that  thofe  precepts  wxre  merely 
temporary,  and  direded  to  the  perfons  of  the  apoflles, 
who  were  armed  only  with  the  fword  of  the  fpirit ; 
that  the  primitive  Chriftians  ufed  prayers  and  tears  only 
no  longer  than  whilft  they  had  no  other  arms.    But 
knowing  that  by  lifting  themfelves  under  the  eniigns 
of  Chriftianicy  they  had  not  loft  the  rights  belong- 
ing to  all  mankind,  when  nations  came  to  be  con- 
verted, they  no  way  thought  themfelves  obliged  to 
give  their  enemies  a  certain  opportunity  of  deftroy- 
ing  them,  when  God  had  put  means  into  their  hands 
of  defending  themfelves  ;  and  proceeded  fo  far  in  this 
way,  that  the  Chriftian*  valour  foon  became  no  lefs 
famous  and  remarkable  than  that  of  the  Pagans. 
They  did  with  the  utmoft  vigour  defend  both  their 
civil  and  religious  rights  againft  all  the  powers  of 
earth  and  hell,  who  by  force  and  fraud  endeavoured 
to  deftroy  them. 

SECT.      VIII. 

Under  the  name  of  tribute  no  more  is  imderjlood  than 
what  the  law  of  each  7iatio?i  gives  to  the  fiipr erne 
magijlrate  for  the  defray'mg  of  public  charges ; 
to  which  the  eujloim  of  the  Romans^  or  fu£eri?igs 
of  the  Jews  have  no  relation. 

*'  T F  anydefire the  diredtionsof thenewteftament,'* 
\^  fays  our  author,"  ^^  he  may  find  out  Saviour 
limiting  and  diftinguifhing  royal  power,  by 
giving  to  C^far  thofe  things  that  are  Caefar's,  and  to 
God  the  things  that  are  God's."  But  that  will  be 
of  no  advantage  to  him  in  this  conteft.  We  do  not 
deny  to  any  man  that  which  is  his  due  ;  but  do  not 

lo 


62  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

fo  well  know  who  is  C^lar,  nor  what  it  is  that  can 
truly  be  faid  to  be  due  to  him.  I  grant  that  when 
thofe  words  were  fpoken,  the  power  of  the  Romans 
exercifed  by  Tiberius  was  then  expreffed  by  the  name 
of  Caefar,  which  he  without  any  title  had  alTumed. 
The  Jews  amongft  many  other  nations  having  been 
fubdued,  fubmitted  to  it;  and  being  no  way  compe- 
tent judges  of  the  rights  belonging  to  the  fenate  or 
people  of  Rome,  were  obliged  to  acknowledge  that 
power  which  their  mafters  were  under.  They  had 
no  commonwealth  of  their  own,  nor  any  other  go- 
vernment amongft  themfelves,  that  was  not  precari- 
ous. They  thought  Chrift  was  to  have  reftored  their 
kingdom,  and  by  them  to  have  reigned  over  the 
nations ;  but  he  fhewed  them>they  were  to  be  fubjeft 
to  the  Gentiles  and  that  within  few  years  their  city 
and  temple  fhould  be  deftroy'd.  Their  common- 
wealth muft  needs  expire  when  all  that  was  prefigured 
by  it  was  accompliflied.  It  was  not  for  them  at 
fuch  a  time  to  prefume  upon  their  abrogated  pri- 
vileges, nor  the  promifes  made  to  them,  which  were 
then  fulfilled.  Nay,  they  had  by  their  fins  profaned 
themfelves,  and  given  to  the  Gentiles  a  right  over 
them,  which  none  could  have  had,  if  they  had  con- 
tinued in  their  obedience  to  the  law  of  God.  This 
was  the  foundation  of  the  Csfars  dominion  over 
them,  but  can  have  no  influence  upon  us. '  The  firfl 
of  the  Csfars  had  not  been  fet  up  by  them  :  the  fe- 
rie^  of  them  had  not  been  continued  by  their  confent ; 
they  had  not  interrupted  the  fuccefiion  by  placing' 
or  difplacing  fuch  as  they  pleafed  :  they  had  not 
brought  in  ftrangers  or  baftards,  nor  preferred 
the  remoteft  in  blood  before  the  nearell:  they 
had  no  part  in  making  the  laws  by  which  they 
v/ere  governed,  nor  had  the  C^fars  fworn  to  them  : 
tliey  had  no  great  cliarter  acknowledging  their  li- 
berties 


Sea.  8.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        63 

berties  to  be  innate  or  inherent  in  them,  confirmed 
by  immemorial  cuftom,  and  ftrengthen'd  by  thirty 
ads  of  their  own  general  affemblies,  with  the  affent 
of  the  Romans:  the  Csefar  who  then  governed  came 
not  to  the  power  by  their  confent :  the  queftion, 
"  will  ye  have  this  man  to  reign  ?"  had  never  been 
afked;  but  he  being  impofed  upon  them,  they  were 
to  fubmit  to  the  laws  by  which  he  governed  their 
mailers.  This  can  be  nothing  to  us,  whofe  cafe  is 
in  every  refpedl  moft  unlike  to  theirs.  We  have  no 
diftatorian  power  over  us ;  and  neither  we  nor  our 
fathers  have  render  d  or  owed  obedience  to  any  hu- 
man laws  but  our  own,  nor  to  any  other  magiftracy 
than  what  we  have  eftabliflied.  We  have  a  king 
who  reigns  by  law.  His  power  Is  from  the  *  "  law 
*'  that  makes  him  king :"  and  we  can  know  only 
from  thence  what  he  is  to  command,  and  what  we 
are  obliged  to  obey.  We  know  the  power  of  the 
Casfars  was  ufurped,  maintained  and  exercifed  with 
the  moft  deteftable  violence,  injuftice  and  cruelty. 
But  tho'  it  had  been  eftablifhed  by  the  confent  of  the 
Romans  from  an  opinion  that  it  was  good  for  them 
in  that  ftate  of  affairs,  it  were  nothing  to  us :  and  we 
could  be  no  more  obliged  to  follow  their  example 
in  that,  than  to  be  governed  by  confuls,  tribunes,  and 
decemviri,  or  to  conftitute  fuch  a  government  as 
they  fet  up  when  they  expelled  their  kings.  Their 
authority  was  as  good  at  one  time  as  at  the  other ;  or 
if  a  difference  ought  to  be  made,  the  preference  is 
to  be  given  to  what  they  did  when  their  m.anners 
were  moft  pure,  the  people  moft  free,  and  when 
virtue  v/as  moft  flourifliing  am^ong  them.  But  if 
v/e  are  not  obliged  to  fet  up  fach  a  magiftracy  as  they 
had,  'tis  ridiculous  to  think  that  fuch  an  obedience 
is  due  to  one  who  is  not  in  being  as  they  paid  to  him 

*  Lex  facit  ut  lit  rex.     BraSIon. 

that 


64.  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

that  was.  And  if  I  fhould  confefs  that  Csfar  hold- 
ing the  fenate  and  people  of  Roncie  under  the  power 
of  the  fword,  impofed  what  tribute  he  pleafed  up- 
on the  provinces ;  and  that  the  Jews,  who  had  no 
part  in  the  government,  were  obliged  to  fubmit  to 
his  will,  our  liberty  of  paying  nothing,  except  what 
tlie  parliament  appoints,  and  yielding  obedience  to 
no  laws  but  fuch  as  are  made  to  be  fo  by  their  au- 
thority, or  by  our  own  immemorial  cuftoms,  could 
not  be  thereby  infringed.  But  we  may  juflly  affirm, 
thatthetribute  impofed  was  not,  as  our  author  infers, 
*^  all  their  coin,"  nor  a  conliderable  part  of  it,  nor 
more  than  what  was  underftood  to  go  for  the  defray- 
ing of  the  public  charges.  Chrift  by  alking  v/hofe 
image  and  fuperfcr  iption  was  ftampt  upon  their  money, 
and  thereupon  commanding  them  to  give  to  Caefar 
that  which  was  Csefar's,  did  not  imply  that  all  was 
his  ;  but  that  Caefar's  money  being  current  amongft 
them,  it  was  a  continual  and  evident  teftimony,  that 
they  acknowledged  themielves  to  be  under  his  jurif- 
didlion,  and  therefore  could  not  refufe  to  pay  the 
tribute  laid  upon  them  by  the  fame  authority,  as  other 
nations  did. 

It  may  alfo  be  obferved,  that  Chrift  did  not  fo 
much  fay  this  to  determine  the  queftions  that 
might  arife  concerning  Caefar's  power :  for  he  plainly 
fays,  that  was  not  his  work ;  but  to  put  the  Phari- 
fees  to  filence  who  tempted  him.  According  to  the 
opinion  of  the  Jews,  that  the  Meffias  would  reftore 
the  kingdom  of  Ifrael,  they  thought  his  firft  work 
would  be  to  throw  off*  the  Roman  yoke  ;  and  not 
believing  him  to  be  the  man,  they  would  have 
brought  him  to  avow  the  thing,  that  they  might 
deftroy  him.  But  as  that  was  not  his  bufinefs,  and 
that  his  time  was  not  yet  come,  it  was  not  neceflary 
to  give  them  any  other  anfwer,  than  fuch  as  might 
I  difappoint 


Sed.S.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       6^ 

difappoint  their  purpofe.     This  fliews  that,  without 
detracting  from  the  honour  due  to  Auftin,  Ambrofe 
or  Tertullian,    I  may  juilly  fay,  that  the  decifion 
of  fuch  queftions  as  arife  concerning  our  governm.ent 
muft  be  decided  by  our  laws,  and  not  by  their  writ- 
ings. They  were  excellent  men,  but  living  in  another 
time,  under  a  very  different  government,  and  ap- 
plying themfelves  to  other  matters,    they  had  no 
knowledge  at  all  of  thole  that  concern  us.     They 
knew  what  government  they  were  under,  and  there- 
upon judged   what  a  broken  and   difperfed  people 
ow'd  to  that  which  had  given  law  to  the  beft  part 
of   the    world    before  they  were   in  being,  under 
tvhich  they  had  been   educated,  and  which  alter  a 
moft  cruel  perfecution  was   become  propitious  to 
them.     They  knew  that  the  word  of  the  emperor 
was  a  law  to  the  fenate  and  people,  v/ho  were  under 
the  power  of  that  man  that  could  get  the  beil  armiy ; 
but  perhaps  had  never  heard  of  fuch  mixed  govern- 
ments as  ours,  tho'  about  that  time   they  began  to 
appear  in  the  world.     And  it  might  be  as  reafon- 
ably  concluded,  that  there  ought  to  be  no  rule  in 
the  fucceilion   or  eledion   of  princes,  becaufe  the 
Roman  emperors  were  (tt  up  by  the  violence  of  the 
foldiers,  and  for  the  moil  part  by  the  ilaughter  of 
him  A^'ho  was  in  poffeflion  of  the  power,  as  that  all 
other  princes  muft  be  abfolute  when  they  have   it, 
and  do  what  they   pleafe,  till   another  more  ftrong 
and  more  happy,  may  by  the  like  means  vv^reft  the 
fame  power  from  them. 

I  am  much  miftaken  if  this  be  not  true ;  but 
without  prejudice  to  our  caufe,  we  may  take  that 
which  they  fay,  according  to  their  true  miCaning, 
in  the  utmoft  extent.  And  to  begin  with  Ter- 
tullian :  'tis  good  to  confider  the  fut.jedl  of  his  dif- 
courfe,  and  to  whom  he  wTote.     The  treatife  cited 

Vol.  II.  F  uy 


66  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

by  our  author  is  the  Apologetic,  and  tends  to  per- 
faade  the  Pagans,  that  civil  magiftrates  might  not 
intermeddle  with  religion ;  and  that  the  laws  made 
by  them  touching  thoie  matters,  were  of  no  value, 
as  relating  to  things  of  which  they  had  no  cog- 
nifance,  "  *  'Tis  not,  fays  he,  length  of  time, 
nor  the  dignity  of  the  legiflators,  but  equity  only 
that  can  commend  laws  •  and  when  any  are  found 
to  be  unjuft,  they  are  defervedly  condemned."  By 
which  words  he  denied  that  the  magiftratical  power 
which  the  Romans  acknowledged  in  C^far,  had  any 
thing  to  do  in  fpiritual  things.  And  little  advantage 
can  be  taken  by  Chriftian  princes  from  what  he  fays 
concerning  the  Roman  emperors  -,  for  he  exprefly 
declares,  "  •+-  That  the  C^efars  would  have  believed 
*'  in  Chrift,  if  they  had  either  not  been  neceffary 
^^  to  the  fecular  government,  or  that  Chriftians 
"  might  have  been  Casfars."  This  feems  to  have  pro- 
ceeded from  an  opinion  received  by  Chriftians  in  the 
firft  ages,  that  the  ufe  of  the  civil  as  well  as  the  mi- 
litary fword  was  equally  accurfed  :  that  ''  Chriftians 
were  to  be  J  fons  of  peace,  enemies  to  no  man  3  and 
that  Chrifi:  by  commanding  Peter  to  put  up  his 
fword,  did  for  ever  difarm  all  Chriftians."  He 
proceeds  to  fay,  ''  ||  We  cannot  fight  to  defend  our 
"  goods,  having  in  our  baptifm  renounced  the  worlds 
'^  and  all  that  is  in  it  -,  nor  to  gain  honours,  account- 
'^  ing  nothing  more  foreign  to  us  than  public  affairs, 
*'  and  acknowledging  no  other  commonwealth  than 

*  Le2;c;s  non  annorum  numerns,  nee  conditorum  dipjiltas,  fed  fola 
zeijuirivs  commendat,  atque  ideo  fi  iniqu^  cognolcunLur  mcrlto  dam- 
iianiur.  Tertv.L   Jp. 

f  Sed  Si  CaTares  fuper  Chrlfto  credidiiTcnt,  fi  ant  Carfares  non 
effent  fajculo  n-tceiiarii,  aut  Chriltiani  potuifieRt  elTc  Lxfares,     Ibid. 

X  Filii  pacis,  nallius  hoftcs ;  &  Chriflus  exarmando  Petrum,  om- 
nem  Chriihanum  milltem  in  asternum  defcinxit.     Ibid. 

|{  Nobis  omnis  glorisc  Sc  dignitatis  ardore  frigentibas,  &c.  Nee 
alia  res  elt  nobis  magis  aliens  quanr;  publica  :  unam  nobis  rempubli- 
cam  mundum  agiiolcinius. 

''  that 


cc 
f,i. 

cc 


Sea.  8.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        67 

"  that  of  the  whole  world  ;"  nor  to  fave  our  lives, 
becaufe  we  account  it  a  happinefs  to  be  killed.    He 
difluades    the  Pagans    from   executing   Chriftians, 
rather  from  charity  to  them  in  keeping  them  from 
the  crime  of  flau^hterins;  the  innocent,  than  that 
they  were  unwilling  to  fuffer :  and  gives  no  other 
reafons  of  their  prayers  for  the  emperors,  than  that 
they  were  commanded  to  love  their  enemies,  and  to 
pray  for  thofe  who  perfecuted  them,  except  fuch  as 
he  drew  from  a  miftake,  that  the  world  was  fhor dy 
to  finifh  with  the  diflblution  of  the  empire.     Ail 
his  works,  as  well  thofe  that  were  written  before 
he  fell  into  Montanifm,  as  thofe  publifhed  after- 
wards, are  full  of  the  IIkc  opinions ;  and  if  Filmer 
acknowledges  them  to  be  true,    he  mufi:  confefs^ 
that  princes  are  not  fathers,  but  *  enemies :  and  not 
only  they,  but  all  thofe  who  render  themfelves  mi- 
nifters  of  the  powders  they  execute,  in  taking  upon 
them  the  fword  that  Chrift  had  curfed,  do  renounce 
him ;  and  we  may  conlider  how  to  proceed  with 
fuch  as  do  fo.     If  our  author  will  not  acknowledge 
this,  then  no  man   was  ever  guilty  of  a  more  vile 
prevarication  than  he,  who  alledges  thofe  words  in 
favour  of  his  caufe,  which  have  their  only  ftrength 
in  opinions  that  he  thinks  falfe,  and  in  the  authority 
of  a  man  whom  in  that  very  thing  he  condemns ; 
and  muft  do  fo,  or  overthrow  all  that  he  endeavours 
to  fupport.      But  TertuUian's  opinions  concerning 
thefe  matters  have  no  relation  to  our  prefciU  qucftion. 
The  defign  of  his  apology,  and  the  trealife  to   Sca- 
pula almoft  upon  the  fame  fubjedl,  was  to  ihow, 
that  the  civil  magiftracy  which  he  comprehends  un- 
der the  name  of  Ca?far,    had  noching  to  do  with 
matters  of  religion ,;  and  that,  as  no  man  could  be 

*  Qai  enim  magis  iiiimici  ChrilVianorum,  quiim  do  c^uoram  majer- 
tate  conveni.T.ur  in  crim.<a;,     Tertul.  jh. 

F  2  -       a 


6S  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill 

a  Chriftlan  who  would  undertake  the  work  of  a 
magiflrate,  they  who  were  jealous  the  public  offices 
might  be  taken  out  of  their  hands,  had  nothing  to 
fear  from  Chriilians  who  refolved  not  to  meddle 
with  them.  Whereas  our  queftion  is  only,  whether 
that  magiftratical  power,  which  by  law  or  ufurpa- 
tion  was  then  in  Csefar,  muft  neceffarily  in  all  times, 
and  in  all  places,  be  in  one  man,  or  may  be  divided 
and  balanced  according  to  the  laws  of  every  country, 
concerning  which  he  fays  nothing  :  or  whether  we, 
who  do  not  renounce  the  ufe  of  the  civil  or  military 
fword,  who  have  a  part  in  the  government,  and 
thin  it  our  duty  to  apply  ourfelves  to  public  cares, 
fliould  lay  them  alide  becaufe  the  antient  Chriftians 
every  hour  expelling  death,  did  not  trouble  them- 
felves  with  them. 

If  Ambrofe  after  he  was  a  bifl^iop,  employed  the 
ferocity  of  a  foldier  which  he  ftill  retained,  rather 
in  advancing  the  power  of  the  clergy,  than  the  good 
of  mankind  by  reflraining  the  rage  of  tyrants,  it 
can  be  no  prejudice  to  our  caufe,  of  which  he  had 
no  cognifance.  He  fpokeof  the  violent  and  defpo- 
tical  government,  to  which  he  had  been  a  minifter 
before  his  baptifm,  and  feems  to  have  had  no  know- 
ledge of  the  Gothic  polity,  that  v/ithin  a  few  years 
erew  famous  by  the  overthrow  of  the  Roman  tyran- 
ny, and  delivering  the  world  from  the  yoke  which 
it  could  no  longer  bear.  And  if  Auftin  might  fay, 
that  ''  the  emperor  is  fubjed:  to  no  laws,  becaufe  he 
"  has  a  power  of  making  laws,"  I  may  as  juflly 
fay,  that  our  kings  are  fubjedl  to  laws  becaufe  they 
can  make  no  law^  and  have  no  power  but  what  is 
given  by  the  laws.  If  this  be  not  the  cafe,  I  deiire 
to  know  who  made  the  laws,  to  which  they  and 
their  predeceflbrs  have  fworn ;  and  whether  they 
can  according  to  their  pwn  will  abrogate,  thofe  an- 
tient 


Sea.  S.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        6g 

tient  laws  by  which  they  are  made  to  be.  what  they 
are,  and  by  which  we  enjoy  what  wc  have ;  or 
whether  they  can  make  new  laws  by  their  own 
power  ?  If  no  man  but  our  author  have  impudence 
enough  to  affert  any  fuch  thing  ;  and  if  all  the  kings 
we  ever  had,  except  Richard  the  fecond,  did  re- 
nounce it,  v/e  may  conclude  that  Auftin's  words  have 
no  relation  to  our  difpute  ;  and  that  'twere  to  no 
purpofe  to  examine,  whether  the  fathers  mention  .^ 
any  refervation  of  power  to  the  laws  of  the  land^ 
or  to  the  people,  it  being  as  lawful  for  all  nations, 
if  they  think  fit,  to  frame  governments  different 
from  thofe  that  w^re  then  in  being,  as  to  build 
baftionSj  halfmoons,  hornworks,  ravelins  or  counter-? 
fcarps,  or  to  make  ufe  of  muilcets,  cannon,  mor- 
tars, carabines  or  piilols  which  were  unknown  to 
them. 

What  Solomon  fays  of  the  Hebrew  kings,  does  as 
little  concern  us.  We  have  already  proved  their 
power  not  to  have  been  abfolute,  tho'  greater  than 
that  which  the  law  allows  to  ours.  It  might  upon 
occafion  be  a  prudent  advice  to  private  perfons  living 
under  fuch  governments  as  were  ufual  in  eaflern 
countries,  "  to  keep  the  king's  commandments, 
''  and  not  to  fay,  what  doft  thou  ?  becaufe  where  tb.e 
*'  word  of  a  king  is,  there  is  power,  and  all  that  he 
^*^  pleafeth  he  will  do."  But  allthefe  words  are  not 
his  j  and  ihofe  that  are,  muft  not  be  taken  in  a  general 
fenfe  ^  for  tho'  his  fon  was  a  king,  yet  in  his  words 
there  v/as  no  power:  he  could  not  do  what  he  pleafed, 
nor  hinder  others  from  doing  what  they  pleafed  :  he 
would  have  added  weight  to  the  yoke  that  lay  upon 
the  necks  of  the  Ifraeiites,  but  he  could  not;  and 
we  do  not  find  him  to  have  been  marter  of  much 
more  than  his  own  tongue,  to  fpeak  as  many  foolifli 
things  as  he  pleafed.     Jn  other  things,  whether  he   ^ 

F  3  had 


7©  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

had  to  deal  with  his  own  people,  or  with  ftrangcrs, 
he  was  weak  and  impotent  5  and  the  wretches  who 
flatter'd  him  in  his  follies,  could  be  of  no  help  to 
him.  The  like  has  befallen  many  others :  thofe  who 
are  wife,  virtuous,  valiant,  juft  and  lovers  of  their 
people,  have  and  ought  to  have  power ;  but  fuch  as 
are  lewd,  vicious,  fooliih.  and  haters  of  their  people, 
ought  to  have  none,  and  are  often  deprived  of  all. 
This  was  well  known  to  Solomon,  who  fays,  that 
*'  a  wife  child  is  better  than  an  old  and  foolilh  1  ing 
*^  that  will  not  be  advifed/'  When  Nabuchodono- 
for  fet  himfelf  in  the  place  of  God,  his  kingdom  was 
taken  from  him,  and  he  was  driven  from  the  fociety 
of  mtn  to  herd  v/ith  beafts.  There  was  power  for 
a  time  in  the  word  of  Nero  :  he  murdered  many 
excellent  men ;  but  he  was  call'd  to  account,  and 
the  world  abandoned  the  monfter  it  had  too  long 
endur'd.  He  found  none  to  defend  him,  nor  any 
better  help  when  he  deiir'd  to  die,  than  the  hand  of 
a  flave  Befides  this,  feme  kings  by  their  inftitution 
have  little  power  ;  fome  have  been  deprived  of  what 
they  had,  for  abufing,  or  rendring  themfelves  un- 
worthy of  it ;  and  hiftories  afford  us  innumerable 
examples  of  both  forts. 

But  tho'  I  ihould  confefs  that  there  is  always  power 
in  the  word  of  a  king,  it  would  be  nothing  to  us  who 
difpute  concerning  right,  and  have  no  regard  to  that 
power  which  is  void  of  it.  A  thief  or  a  pirate  may 
have  power-  but  that  avails  him  not,  when,  as  often 
befel  the  Csfars,  he  meets  with  one  who  has  more, 
and  is  always  unfafe,  lince  having  no  efFed:  upon 
the  confciences  of  men,  every  one  may  deftroy  him 
that  can  :  and  I  leave  it  to  kings  to  confider  how 
much  they  ftand  obliged  to  thofe,  who  pacing  their 
rights  upon  the  fam.e  foot,  expofe  their  perfons  to 
the  fame  dangers. 

But 


Sta.  S.      CONCERNING  GOVERNIMENT.       yi 

But  if  kings  defire  that  in  their  word  there  ihould 
be  power,  let  them  take  care  that  it  be  always  ac- 
companied with  truth  and  juftice.  Let  them  ieek 
the  good  of  their  people,  and  the  hands  of  all 
rrood  men  will  be  with  them.  Let  them  not  exalt 
themfelves  infolently,  and  every  one  will  defire  to 
exalt  them.  Let  them  acknowledge  themfelves  to 
be  the  fervants  of  the  public,  and  all  men  will  be 
theirs.  Let  fuch  as  are  moft  addided  to  them,  talk 
no  more  of  Caefars,  nor  the  tributes  due  to  them. 
We  have  nothing  to  do  with  the  name  of  Ca^far. 
They  who  at  this  day  live  under  it,  rejed;  the  pre- 
rogatives antiently  ufurped  by  thofe  that  had  it,  and 
are  govern'd  by  no  other  laws  than  their  own.  We 
know  no  law  to  which  we  owe  obedience  but  that 
of  God,  and  ourfelves.  Afiatic  flaves  ufually  pay 
fuch  tributes  as  are  impofed  upon  them ;  and  whilit 
braver  nations  lay  under  the  Roman  tyranny,  they 
were  forced  to  fubmiit  to  the  fame  burdens.  But 
even  thofe  tributes  were  paid  for  maintaining  armies, 
fleets  and  garrifons,  without  which  the  poor  and 
abjedl  life  they  led  could  not  have  been  preferved. 
We  owe  none  but  what  we  freely  give.  None  is 
or  can  be  impofed  upon  us,  unlefs  by  ourfelves. 
We  meaiure  our  grants  according  to  our  own 
will,  or  the  prefent  occafions,  for  our  own  fafety. 
Our  anceflors  were  born  free^  and,  as  the  beft  pro- 
vifion  they  could  ma  e  for  us,  they  left  us  that  liberty 
intire,  with  the  belT:  laws  they  could  devife  to  defend 
it.  'Tis  noway  impair'dby  the  opinions  of  the  fathers. 
The  words  of  Solomon  do  rather  confirm  it.  The 
happinefs  of  thofe  who  enjoy  the  like,  and  the 
fliameful  m.ifery  they  lie  under,  who  have  fuflfer'd 
,themfelves  to  be  forced  or  cheated  out  of  it,  may 
perfuade,  and  the  juHice  of  the  caufe  encourage  us  to 

F  4  think 


71  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

think  nothing  too  dear  to  be  hazarded  in  the  defence 
of  it. 

SECT.     IX. 

Cur  own  Idws   confirm   to  zis   the  enjoyment    of  cur 

native  rights, 

F  that  which  our  author  calls  divinity  did  reach 
the  things  in  difpute  between   us,  or    that  the 
opinions  of  the  fathers  which  he  alledges,  related  to 
them,   he  might  havefpared  the  pains  of  examining 
our  laws :  for  a   municipal   fandlion   were  of  little 
force  to  confirm  a  perpetual  and  univerfal  law  given 
by   God  to  mankind,  and   of  no  value  againft   it, 
iince  man  cannot  abrogate  what  God  hath  inftituted, 
nor  one  nation  free  itfelf  from  a  law  that  is  given  to 
all.       But  having    abufed   the  fcriptures,    and  the 
waitings  of  the  fathers,  (whofe   opinions  are  to  be 
valued  only  fo  far  as  they  rightly  interpret  them) 
he  feems  defirous  to  try  whether  he  can  as  well  put 
a  falfe  fenfe  upon  our  law,  and  has  fully  compaffed 
his  defign.     According  to  his  cuftom  he  takes  pieces 
of  paiTages  from  good  books,  and  turns  them  direcflly 
againft  the  plain  meaning  of  the  authors,  exprefled 
in  the  Vvdiole  fcope  and  deiign  of  their  writings.     To 
fiiow  that  he  intends  to  fpare  none,  he  is  not  afhamed 
to  cite  Bradon,   who  of  all   our  antient  law-writers 
is  moft  oppoiite  to  his  maxims.  He  lived,  fays  he,  in 
Henry  the  third's  time,  fince  parliamiCnts  w^re  in- 
-ftlcuted  :  as  if  there  had  been  a  time  when  England 
had  wanted  tliem  ;  or  that  the  eftablilliment  of  our 
liberty  had  been  made  by  the   Kormans,  who,  if 
we  will  believe  our  author,  came  in   by  force  of 
armxS,  and  opprcffed  us.     But  we  have  already  proved 
the  eflcnce  of  parliaments  to  be  as  antient  as    our 
nation,  and  that  there  was  no  time  in  which  there 

were 


cc 

CI 

cc 


Sea.  9.     CONCER>s'ING  GOVERNMENT.        7- 

were  not  fuch  councils  or  affemblies  of  the  people 
as  had  the  power  of  the  whole,  and  rnade  or  unmade 
fuch  laws  as  beft  pleafed  themfelves.     We  have  in- 
deed a  French  word  from  a  people  that  came  from 
France,  but  the  power  was  always  in  ourfclves  5  and 
the   Norman    kings  were    obliged  to    fwear    they 
would  govern  according  to  the   laws  that  had  been 
made  by  thofe  affemblies.     It  imports  little  whether 
Brailon  lived  before  or  after  they  cam.e  amongft  us. 
His  words  are,  *'  Omnes  fub  eo,  &  ipfe  fub  nullo, 
''  fed  tantum  fub  Deo ;  all  are  under  him  and  he 
^'  under  none  but  God  only.     If  he  offend,  iince 
no  writ  can  go  out  againft  him,  their  remedy  is 
by  petitioning  him  to  amend  his  faults ;  which  if 
he  will  not  do,  it  is  punilhment  enough  for  him 
to  expedl  God  as  an  avenger.     Let  none  prefume 
to  look  into  his  deeds,  much  lefs  to  oppofe  him." 
Here  is  a  mixture  of  fenfe  and  nonfenfe,  truth  and 
falihood,  the  words  of  Bradon  with  our  author's 
foolifh  inferences  from  them.  Bradton  fpoke  of  the 
politic  capacity  of  the  king,  when  no  law  had  for- 
bidden him  to  divide  it  from  his  natural.     He  gave 
the  name  of  king  to  the  fovereign   pov^er   of  the 
nation,  as  Jacob  called   that  of  his  defcendants  the 
fceptre  ;  which  he  faid  (hould  not  depart  from  Judah 
till  Shiloh  came,  tho'  all  men  know  that  his  race  did 
not  reign  the  third  part  of  that  time  over  his  own 
tribe,  nor  full  fourfcore  years  over  the  whole  nation. 
The  fame  manner  of  fpeech   is  ufed  in  all  parts  of 
the  world.     Tertullian  under  the  name   of  Csfar 
comprehended  all  magillratical  power,  and  imputed 
to  him  the  a6ls  of  which  in  his  perfon  he  never  had 
any  knowledge.     The  French  fay,  their  king  is  al- 
ways prefent,   "  fur  fon  lit  de  juflice,"  in  all  the  fo- 
vereign courts  of  the  kingdom,  which  are  not  eafi- 
ly  numbered;  and  that  maxim  could  have  in  it  nei- 
ther 


74  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

ther  fenfe  nor  truth,  if  by  it  they  meant  a  man,  who 
can  be  but  in  one  place  at  one  time,  and  is  always 
comprehended  within  the  dimenfions  of  his  own 
ikin.  Thefe  things  could  not  be  unknown  to  Brae- 
ton,  the  like  being  in  ufe  amongft  us ;  and  he 
thought  it  no  offence  fo  far  to  follow  the  didlates  of 
reafon  prohibited  by  no  law,  as  to  make  a  difference 
between  the  invifible  and  omniprefent  king,  who 
never  dies,  and  the  perfon  that  wears  the  crown, 
whom  no  man  v/ithout  the  guilt  of  treafon  may  en- 
deavour to  kill,  fince  there  is  an  ad:  of  parliament 
in  the  cafe.  I  will  not  determine  whether  he  fpoke 
properly  or  no  as  to  England  ;  but  if  he  did  not, 
all  that  he  faid  being  upon  a  falfe  fuppofition,  is  no- 
thing to  our  purpofe.  The  fame  Bradon  fays  "  the 
*'  king  doth  no  wrong,"  in  as  much  as  he  doth  no- 
thing but  by  law.  *'  *The  power  of  the  king  is 
"  the  power  of  the  law,  a  power  of  right  not  of 
wrong."  Again,  '*  If  -f*  the  king  does  injuftice, 
''  he  is  not  king."  In  another  place  he  has  thefe 
words;  "  ;{;  The  king  therefore  ought  to  exerclfe 
^'  the  power  of  the  lav^,  as  becomes  the  vicar  and 
*^*  minlfter  of  God  upon  earth,  becaufe  that  power 
is  the  power  of  God  alone ;  but  the  power  of 
doing  wrong  is  the  power  of  the  devil,  and  not  of 
**  God.  And  the  king  is  his  minifter  whofe  work 
**  he  does  :  whilft  he  does  juftice,  he  is  the  vicar  of 
^'  the  eternal  king ;  but  if  he  defied  from  it  to  ad 
"  uniuftly,  he  is  the  minifter  of  the  devil."  He 
alfo  fays  that  the  king  is  ''  fingulis  major,  unlverfis 

*  Poteftas  regis  eft  poteftas  legis,  poteftas  juris  non  injuriae. 

Bracl.  de  leg,  Angl, 

\  Qui  fi  facit  injuriam,  non  eft  rex      Ibid. 

X  Exercere  igitar  debet  rex  poteftatem  juris  ficut  Dei  vicarius  &r 
minlfter  in  terra,  qiia  ilia  poteftas  folius  Deleft,  poteftas  autem  inju- 
ria dlaboli  eft  non  Dei ;  &  cujus  horum  opera  fecerit  rex,  ejus  minlf- 
ter erit :  igitur  dum  facit  juftkiam,  vicarius  eft  regis  aeterni:  minlfter 
autem  diaboli  dum  declinet  ad  injuriam.     Ibid.     1.  3. 

"  minor;" 


Sta.  9.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        75 

•*  minor ;"  and  that  he  who  is  "  in  juftitia  exequen- 
«'  da  omnibus  major,  in  juftitia  recipienda  cuilibet 
**  ex  plebe  fit  equalis."     I  fliall  not  lay  Bradlon  is 
in  the  right  when  he  fpeaks  in  this   manner  ;  but 
'tis  a  ftrange  impudence  in  Fihner  to  cite  him  as  a 
patron  of  the  abfolute  powxr  of  kings,  who  does  fo 
extremely  deprefs  them.     But  the  grofieft  of  his 
.  .follies  is  yet  m.ore  pardonable  than  his  deteftablc 
ff  fraud  in  falfifying  Brafton's  words,  and  leaving  out 
fuch  as   are  not  for  his  purpofe,  which  fhew  his 
meaning  to  be  diredly  contrary  to  the  fenfe  put 
upon  them.  That  this  may  appear,  I  fhall  fet  down 
the  words  as  they  are  found  in  Bractcn  :    ''  Ipfe 
**  autcm  rex  non  debet  eiTe  fub  homine,  fed  fub 
*'  Deo,  &  fub  lege,  quia  lex  facit  regem.     Attri- 
*'  buat  ergo  rex  legi  quod  lex  attribuit  ei,  id  eft  do- 
minationem  &  poteftatem  :  non  eft  enim  rex  ubi 
dominatur  voluntas  &  non  lex  ;  &  quod  fub  lege 
*'  effe  debeat,  cum  fit  Dei  vicarlus,  evidenter  ap- 
*'  paret."      If    Bradton  therefore  be  a  competent 
judge,  the  king  is  under  the  law;  and  he  is  not  a 
king,  nor  God's  vicegerent  unlefs  he  be  fo;  and 
v^e  all  know  how  to  proceed  with  thofe  who  beingr 
under  the  law,  offend  againfl:  it.     For  the  law  is  not 
made  in  vain.     In  this  cafe  fomething  more  is  to  be 
done  than  petitioning;    and  'tis  ridiculous  to  fay, 
"  that  if  "  he  will  not  amend,    'tis  puni£hment 
"  enough  for  him  to  exped:  God  an  avenger;"  for 
the  fame  may  be  faid  of  all  malefadors.     God  can 
fufficiently  punifh  thieves  and  murderers :  but  the 
future  judgment,  of  which  perhaps  they  have  no 
belief,  is  not  fufficient  to  refl:rain  them  from  com- 
-  mitting  more  crimes,  nor  to  deter  others  from  fol- 
lowing their  example.     God  was  always  able  to 
punifh  murderers,    but  yet  by  his  law  he  commands 
man  to  (bed  the  blood  of  him  who  fhould  ihed 

man's 


76  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

man's  blood  ;  and  declares  that  the  land  cannot  be 
purged  of  the  guilt  by  any  other  means.  He  had 
judgments  in  flore  for  Jeroboam,  Ahab,  and  thofe 
that  were  like  them  ;  but  yet  he  commanded  that, 
according  to  that  law,  tlieirhoufes  fhould  be  deftroy  d 
from  the  earth.  The  doo;s  lick'd  up  the  blood  of 
Ahab,  where  they  had  licked  that  of  Naboth,  and 
eat  Jezebel  who  had  contrived  his  murder.  ''  But," 
fays  our  author,  "  we  muft  not  look  into  his  deeds, 
"  much  lefs  oppofe  them."  MvA  not  David  look 
into  Saul's  deeds,  nor  oppofe  them  ?  Why  did  he 
then  bring  together  as  many  men  as  he  could  to 
oppofe,  and  make  foreign  alliances  again  ft  him, 
even  with  the  Moibites  and  the  accurfcd  Philiftines? 
Why  did  Jehu  not  only  deftroy  Ahab's  houfe,  but 
kill  the  king  of  Judah  and  his  forty  brothers,  only  for 
going  to  vifit  his  children  ?  Our  author  m^ay  perhaps 
fay,  becaufe  God  commanded  them.  But  if  God  com- 
manded them  to  do  fo,  he  did  not  command  them 
and  all  mankind  not  to  dofo;  and  if  he  did  not  forbid, 
they  have  nothing  to  refiirain  them  from  doing  the 
like,  unlefs  they  have  made  municipal  laws  of  their 
6wn  to  the  contrary,  which  our  author  and  his 
followers  may  produce  when  they  can  find  them. 

His  next  work  is  to  go  l^ck  again  to  the  tribute, 
paid  by  Chrift  to  Ca^far,  and  judicioufly  to  infer,  that 
all  nations  muftpay  the  fame  duty  to  their  magiftrates, 
as  the  Jews  did  to  the  Romans  who  had  fubdued 
them.  *^  Chrift  did  not,"  fays  he,  ''  afl^  what  the 
law  of  the  land  was,  nor  inquire  whether  there 
was  a  ftatute  again  li  it,  nor  v/hether  the  tribute 
were  given  by  the  confent  of  the  people,  but  up- 
on fight  of  the  fuperfcription  concluded,  &c."  It 
had  been  ftrange  if  Chrifl  had  inquired  after  their 
laws,  ftatutes  or  confent,  when  he  knew  that  their 
commonwealth,  with  all  the  laws  by  which  it  had 

fubfifted. 


cc 


Sea.  9.      CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       77 

fubfifted,  was  abolifhed;  and  that  Ifrael  was  become 
a  fervant  to  thofe  who  exercifed  a  moft  violent  domi- 
nation over  them  ;  which  being  a  peculiar  punifTi- 
ment  for  their  peculiar  fins,  can  have  no  influence 
upon  nations  that  are  not  under  the  fame  circum- 
fiances. 

But  of  all  that  he  fays,  nothing  is  more  incom- 
prehenfible,  than  what  he  can  mean  by  lawful  kings 
to  whom  all  is  due  that  was  due  to  the  R.oman  ufur- 
pers.  For  lawful  kings  are  kings  by  the  law  :  In 
being  kings  by  the  law,  they  are  fuch  kings  as  the 
law  makes  them,  and  that  law  only  mufi  tell  us 
what  is  due  to  them;  or  by  an  univerfal  patriarchicai 
right,  to  which  no  man  can  have  a  title,  as  is  faid 
before,  till  he  prove  himfelf  to  be  the  right  heir  of 
Noah.  If  neither  of  thefe  are  to  be  regarded,  but  • 
rfiat  right  follows  pofTeffion,  there  is  no  fuch  thing 
as  an  ufurper  ^  he  who  has  the  power  has  the  right, 
as  indeed  Filmer  fays,  and  his  wifdom  as  well, 
as  his  integrity  is  fufficiently  declared  by  the  afler- 
tion. 

This  wicked  extravagancy  is  followed  by  an  atten:jpt 
of  as  Angular  ignorance  and  ftupidity,  to  fliuffle  t<.3~ 
gether  ufurpers  and  conquerors,  as  if  they  were  the 
fame  ^  whereas  there  have  been  many  ufurpers  who 
were  not  conquerors,  and  conquerors  that  deferved 
not  the  name  of  ufurpers.  No  wife  inan  ever  faid 
that  Agathocles  or  Dionyfius  concper^d  Syracufe , 
Tarquin,  Galba  or  Otho,  Rome  ;  Cromwel,  Eng- 
land 3  or  that  the  Magi,  who  feiz'd  the  government 
of  Perfia  after  the  death  of  C'ambyfes,  conquered 
that  country.  When  Mofes  and  Joihua  had  over- 
thrown the  kingdoms  of  the  Amorltes,  Moabites  and 
Canaanites;  or  when  David  fubdued  the  Ammoniies, 
Edomites,  and  others,  none,  as  I  fuppofe,  but  fuch 

divines 


yS  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

divines  as  Filmer,  will  fay  they  ufurped  a  dominion 
over  them.  There  is  fuch  a  thing  amongft  men  as 
juft  war,  or  elfe  true  valour  would  not  be  a  virtue 
but  a  crime ;  and  inftead  of  glory,  the  utmoft  in- 
famy would  always  be  the  companion  of  victory. 
There  are,  (fays  *  Grotius,)  laws  of  war  as  well  as 
of  peace.  He  who  for  a  juft  caufe,  and  by  juft 
means,  carries  on  a  juft  war,  has  as  clear  a  right  to 
what  is  acquired  as  can  be  enjoy *d  by  man,  but  all 
ufurpation  is  deteftable  and  abominable. 

SECT.      X. 

^he  ivords  of  St.  Paul  enjoining  obedience  to  higher 
powers^  favour  all  forts  of  governments  no  lefs  than 
monarchy. 

U  R  author's  next  quarrel  is  with  St.  Paul, 
"  who  did  not,"  as  he  fays,  "  in  enjoining 
*'  fubjeftion  to  the  higher  powers,  iignify  the  laws 
*'  of  the  land,  or  mein  the  higheft powers,  as  well 
*'  ariftocratical  and  dem.ocratical  as  regal,  but  a 
"  monarch  that  carries  the  fword,  &;c."  But  what 
if  there  be  no  monarch  in  the  place  ?  or  what  if  he 
do  not  carry  the  fv/ord  ?  Had  the  apoftle  fpoken  in 
vain,  if  the  liberty  of  the  Romans  had  not  been 
overthrown  by  the  fraud  and  violence  of  Csefar  ? 
Was  no  obedience  to  be  exafted  whilft  that  people 
enjoy'd  the  benefit  of  their  own  laws,  and  virtue 
ftouriftied  under  the  moderate  government  of  a  legah 
and  juft  magiftracy,  eftabliftied  for  the  common- 
good,  by  the  common  confcnt  of  all  ?  Had  God 
no  minifter  amongft  them  till  law  and  juftice  was 
overthrown,  the  beft  part  of  the  people  deftroy'd  by 
the  fury  of  a  corrupt  mercenary  foldiery,  and  the 
world   fubdued  under  the  tyranny  of  the   worft^ 

*  Belli  asq^uff  ac  pads  jura.     Dcjiir.  l^L  t^  tac, 

monfters 


Sea.  10.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      7 

monfters  that  it  had  ever  produced  ?  Are  thefe  the 
ways  of  eftablifhing  God's  vicegerents  ?  and  v^^ill  he 
patronize  no  governors  or  governments  but  fuch  as 
thefe  f^  Does  God  uphold  evil,  and  that  only?  If  the 
world  has  been  hitherto  miflaken,  in  giving  the  name 
of  evil  to  that  which  is  good,  and  calling  that  good 
which  is  evil ;  I  defire  to  know  what  can  be  call'd 
good  amongft  men,  if  the  government  of  the 
Romans,  till  they  entred  Greece  and  Afia,  and  were 
corrupted  by  the  luxury  of  both,  do  not  deferve  that 
name  ^  or  what  is  to  be  efteemed  evil,  if  the  eftab- 
liihment  and  exercife  of  the  Casfars  power  were  not 
fo  ?  But  fays  he,  "  Wilt  thou  not  be  afraid  of  the 
**  power  ?"  And  was  there  no  power  in  the  govern- 
ments that  had  no  monarchs  ?  Were  the  Cartha- 
ginians, Romans,  Grecians,  Gauls,  Germans  and 
Spaniards  without  power .?  Was  there  no  fword  in 
that  nation  and  their  magiftrates,  who  overthrew  the 
kingdoms  of  Armenia,  Egypt,  Numidia,  IVIacedon, 
and  many  others,  whom  none  of  the  monarchs  were 
able  to  refift  ?  Are  the  Venetians,  Switzers,  Grifons 
and  Hollanders  now  left  in  the  fame  weaknefs,  and  no 
obedience  at  all  due  to  their  magiflrates.?^  If  this  be  fo^ 
how  comes  it  to  pafs  that  jullice  isfo  welladminiftred 
amongft  them  ?  V/ho  is  it  that  defends  the  Holl  an* 
dcrs  in  fuch  a  manner,  that  the  greatefl  monarchs 
with  all  their  f words  have  had  no  great  reafon  to  boaft 
of  any  advantages  gained  againft  them?  at  leaft  till  we 
(whom  theycouldnotrefift  when  we  had  no  monarch, 
tho'  we  have  been  difgracefully  beaten  by  them  fince  w^e 
had  one)  by  making  leagues  againft  them,  and  fow- 
ing  divifions  amongft  them,  inftigated  and  aflifted 
the  greateft  power  nov/  in  the  world  to  their  de- 
ftrn6lion  and  our  own.  But  our  author  is  fo  ac- 
cuftom'd  to  fraud,  that  he  never  cites  a  paiTage  of 
fcripture  which  he  does  not  abufe  or  vitiate  >  and 

z  tliat 


So  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

that  he  may  do  the  fame  in  this  place,  he  leaves 
out  the  following  words,  "  For  there  is  no  power 
"  but  of  God,"  that  he  might  intitle  one  fort  only 
to  his  protedlion.  If  therefore  the  people  and  po- 
pular magijftrates  of  Athens ;  the  two  kings,  Epho- 
ri  and  fenate  of  ^Sparta;  the  Sanhedrins  amongft 
the  Hebrews  -,  the  confuls,  tribunes,  pretors  and 
fenate  of  Rome ;  the  magiftrates  of  Holland,  Switzer- 
land and  Venice,  have  or  had  power,  we  may  con- 
clude that  they  alfo  were  ordained  by  God ;  and 
that  according  to  the  precept  of  the  apoftle,  the 
fame  obedience  for  the  fime  reafon  is  due  to  them  as 
to  any  monarch. 

The  apoftle  farther  explaining  himfelf,  and  View- 
ing who  may  be  accounted  a  magiftrate,  and  what 
the  duty  of  fuch  an  one  is,  informs  us  when  we 
Ihould  fear,  and  on  what  account.  "  Rulers,  fays 
*'  he,  are  not  a  terror  to  good  works,  but  to  the 
''  evil :  wilt  thou  then  not  be  afraid  of  the  power?  do 
*'  that  which  is  good,  and  thou  Ihalt  have  praife  of 
"  the  fame;  for  he  is  the  minifter  of  God,  a  re- 
'^  venger  to  execute  wrath  upon  him  that  doth  evil," 
He  therefore  is  only  the  minifter  of  God,  who  is 
not  a  terror  to  good  works,  but  to  evil ;  who  exe- 
cutes wrath  upon  ihofe  that  do  evil,  and  is  a  praife 
to  thofe  that  do  well.  And  he  wlio  doth  wellj 
ought  not  to  be  afraid  of  the  power,  for  he  fhall 
receive  praife.  Now  if  our  author  were  alive,  tho' 
he  was  a  man  of  a  hard  forehead,  I  would  aik.  him, 
whether  in  his  confcience  he  believed,  that  Tiberius, 
Caligula,  Claudius,  Nero,  and  the  rabble  of  fuc- 
ceeding  maonfters,  v/ere  a  praife  to  thofe  who  did 
well,  and  a  terror  to  thofe  who  did  ill  ^  and  not 
the  contrary,  a  praife  to  the  worft,  and  a  terror  to 
the  beft  men  of  the  world  ?  or  for  what  reafon. 

Tacitus 


Sedl.  lo.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      Si 

*  Tacitus  could  fay,  that  virtue  brought  men  who 
lived  under  them  to  certain  deftruftion,  and  recite 
(o  many  examples  of  the  brave  and  good,  who 
were  murder'd  by  them  for  being  fo,  unlefs  they 
had  endeavour'd  to  extinguifh  all  that  was  good, 
and  to  -f-  tear  up  virtue  by  the  roots  ?  Why  did  he 
call  Domitian  an  J  enemy  to  virtue,  if  he  was  a 
terror  only  to  thofe  that  did  evil  ?  If  the  world  has 
hitherto  been  mifled  in  thefe  things,  and  given  the 
name  of  virtue  to  vice,  and  of  vice  to  virtue,  then 
Germanicus,  Valerius  Afiaticus,  Corbulo,  Helvidi- 
us  Prifcus,  Thrafeas,  Soranus  and  others  that  re- 
fembled  them,  who  fell  under  the  rage  of  thofe 
beafts,  nay  Paul  himfelf  and  his  difciples  were  evil 
doers ;  and  Macro,  Narciffus,  Pallas,  Vinnius,  La- 
co  and  Tigellinus  were  virtuous  and  good  men.  If 
this  be  fo,  v/e  are  beholden  to  Filtner  for  admonifli- 
ing  mankind  of  the  error  in  which  they  had  fo  long 
continued.  If  not,  thofe  who  perfecuted  and  mur- 
der'd them  for  their  virtues,  were  not  a  terror  to 
fuch  as  did  evil,  and  a  praife  to  thofe  who  did  well. 
The  worft  men  had  no  need  to  fear  them ;  but  the 
befi:  had,  becaufe  they  were  the  beft,  all  princes 
therefore  that  have  power  are  not  to  be  efteemed 
equally  the  minifters  of  God.  They  that  are  fo, 
muft  receive  their  dignity  from  a  title  that  is  not 
common  to  all,  even  from  a  juft  employment  of 
their  power  to  the  encouragement  of  virtue,  and  to 
the  difcouragement  of  vice.  He  that  pretends 
to  the  veneration  and  obedience  due  to  the  minif- 
ters of  God,  muft  by  his  adions  manifeft  that  he 
is  fo.  And  tho'  I  am  unwilling  to  advance  a  pro- 
pofition  that  may  found  harfhly  to  tender  ears,  I 
am  inclined  to  believe,  that  the  fame  rule,  which 

*  Ob  virtutes  certifTimum  exitium. 
-f-  Ipfam  eK'cindere  virtutcn;. 
X  Virtutibus  iufcHum. 

Vol.  II.  C  obliges 


g2  DISCOURSES        Ghap.  IK 

obliges  us  to  yield  obedience  to  the  good  magiftratc 
who  is  the  minifter  of  God,  and  afTures  us  that  in 
obeying  him  we  obey  God,  does  equally  oblige  us 
not  to  obey  thole  who  make  themfelvcs  the  minifters 
of  the  devil,  left  in  obeying  them  we  obey  the  devil, 
whofe  works  they  do. 

That  none  but  fuch  as  are  wilfully  ignorant  may 
miftake  Paul's  meaning,  Peter  who  \vas  direfted  by 
the  lame  fplrit,  lays  diiiindtly,  ''  Submit  your  felves 
*'  to  every  ordinance  of  man  for  the  Lord's  fake." 
If  therefore  there  be  feveral  ordinances  of  men 
tending  to  the  fame  end,  that  is,  the  obtaining  of 
judice,  by  being  a  terror  to  the  evil  and  a  praife  to 
the  ffood,  the  like  obedience  is  for  confcience  fake 
enjoined  to  all,  and  upon  thfe  fame  condition.  But 
as  no  man  dares  to  fay,  that  Athens  and  Periia,  Car- 
thage and  Egypt,  Switzerland  and  France,  Venice 
and  Turky  were  and  are  under  the  fame  government; 
the  fame  obedience  is  due  to  the  magiftrate  in  every 
one  of  thofe  places,  and  all  others  on  the  fame  ac- 
count, whilft  they  continue  to  be  the  minifters  of 
God. 

If  our  author  fay,  tliat  Peter  cannot  comprehend 
kings  under  the  name  of  human  ordinances,  fince 
Paul  fays  they  are  the  ordinance  of  God,  I  may  as 
well  lay  that  Paul  cannot  call  that  the  ordinance  of 
God,  which  Peter  calls  the  ordinance  of  man.  But 
as  it  was  faid  of  Mofes  and  Samuel,  that  they  who 
fpoke  by  the  fame  fpirit  could  not  contradid:  each 
other,  Peter  and  Paul  being  full  of  wifdom  and 
iandtity,  and  infpir'd  by  the  fame  fpirit,  muft  needs 
,fay  the  fame  thing;  and  Grotius  fliews  that  they 
perfed:ly  agree,  tho'  the  one  calls  kings,  rulers  and 
governors  the  ordinance  of  man,  and  the  other  the 
ordinance  of  God ;  inafmuch  as  God  liaving  from 
the  beginning  ordained  that  men  fliould  not  live  like. 

wolves  S 


Sea.  ro.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        S3 

wolves  in  woods,  every  man  by  himfelf,  but  together 
in  civil  focieties,  left  to  every  one  a  liberty  of  join- 
ing with  that  fociety  which  beil  pleas'd  hirn,  and  to 
every  fociety  to  create  fuch  magiilrates,  and  frame 
fuch  laws  as  fliould  fecm  moft  conducing  to  their 
own  good,  according  to  the  meafure  of  light  and 
reafon  they  might  have.  And  every  magiilracy  fo 
inftituted  might  rightly  be  called  the  ordinance  of 
man,  who  was  the  inftituter,  and  the  ordinance  of 
God,  according  to  which  itwasinftituted^  '•  becaufe/* 
fays  he,  "  God  approved  and  ratified  the  falutary 
"  conftitations  of  government  m.ade  by  men"^'/' 

But,  fays  our  author,  Peter  expounds  his  own 
words  of  the  human  ordinance  to  be  the  king,  wha 
is  the  "  lex  loquens  3"  but  he  fays  no  fuch  thing, 
and  I  do  not  find  that  any  fuch  thought  ever  enter'd 
into  the  apoftie's  mind.  The  words  are  often  found 
in  the  works  of  Plato  and  Ariflotle,  but  applied  only 
to  fuch  a  man  as  is  a  king  by  nature,  who  is  endow 'd 
with  all  the  virtues  that  tend  to  the  good  of  human 
focieties  in  a  greater  meafure  than  any  or  all  thofe 
that  compofe  them ;  which  character  I  think,  will 
be  ill  applied  to  ail  kings.  And  that  this  may  appear 
to  be  true,  I  defire  to  know  whether  it  would  well 
have  agreed  with  Nero,  Caligula,  Domitian,  or  others 
like  to  them  ;  and  if  not  with  them,  then  not  with 
all,  but  only  with  thofe  who  are  endow'd  with  fuch 
virtues.  But  if  the  king  be  made  by  man,  he  mud 
be  fuch  as  man  makes  him  to  be  ;  and  if  the  power 
of  a  \zw  had  been  given  by  any  human  fan6tion  to 
the  word  of  a  foolilh,  mad,  or  wicked  man  (which 
I  hardly  believe)  it  would  be  dcilroy'd  by  its  own 
iniquity  and  turpitude,  and  the  people  left  under  the 
obligation  of  rendring  obedience  to  thofe,  who  fo  ufe 

*  Quia  falubrem  honiiiium  conflitationem  Deus  probavit  Sc  fanxic. 

G  2  the 


84  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

the   fword  that  the  nations  under  them  may  live 
foberly,  peaceably  and  honeftly. 

This  obhges  me  a  httle  to  examine  what  is  meant 
by  the  fword.     The  pope  fays  there  are  two  fwords, 
the  one  temporal,  the  other  fpiritual,  and  that  both 
of  them  were  given  to  Peter  and  to  his  fucceflbrs. 
Others  m.ore  rightly  underfland  the  two  fwords   to 
be  that  of  war  and  that  of  juftice,  which  according 
to  feveral  conftitutions  of  governments  have  been 
committed  to  feveral  hands,  under  feveral  conditions 
and  limitations.     The  Iword  of  juftice  comprehends 
the  leglflative  and  the  executive  power  :    the  one  is 
exercifed  in  making  laws,  the  other  in  judging  con- 
troverfies  according  to  fuch  as  are  made.     The  mili^ 
tary  fword  is  ufed  by  tliofe  magiftrates  who  have  it, 
in  making  war  or  peace  with  whom  they  think  fit, 
and  fometimes  by  others  who  have  it  not,  in  purfuing 
fuch  wars  as  are  refolved  upon  by  another  power. 
The  Jewifli  docftors  generally  agree  that  the  kings  of 
Judah  could  make  no  law,  becaufe  there  was  a 
curfe  denounced  againft  thofe  who  fliould  add  to, 
or  detract  from  that  which  God  had  given  by  the 
hand  of  Mofes;  that  they  might  fit  in  judgment  with 
the  high  prieft  and  fanhedrin,  but  could  not  judge 
by  themfelves  unlefs  the  fanhedrin  did  plainly  fail  of. 
performing  their  duty.     Upon  this  account  Maimo- 
nides  excufes  David  for  commanding  Solomon  not  to 
fuffer  the  grey  hairs  of  Joab  to  go  down  to  the  grave 
in  peace,  and  Solomon  for  appointing  him  to  be 
kill'd  at  the  foot  of  the  altar :  for  he  having  killed 
Abner  and  Amafa,  and  by  thofe  actions  flied  the 
blood  of  war  in  the  time  of  peace,  the  fanhedrin 
fhould  have  puniflied  him ;  but  being  protected  by 
favour  or  power,  and  even  David  himfelf  fearing 
him,  Solomon  was  put  in  mind  of  his  duty,  which 
he  performed,  tho'  Joab  laid  hold  upon  the  horns  of 

the 


Sea.  lo.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       85 

the  altar,  which  by  the  exprefs  words  of  the  law  gave 
no  prote6lion  to  wilful  murderers. 

The  ufe  of  the  military  fword  amongft  them  was 
alfo  moderated.  Their  kings  might  make  war  upon 
thefeven  accurfed  nations  that  they  were  commanded 
to  deftroy,  and  fo  might  any  other  man ;  for  no  peace 
was  to  be  made  with  them :  but  not  againft  any  otlier 
nation,  without  the  affent  of  the  fanhedrin.  And 
when  Amazlah  contrary  to  that  law  had  fooliflily 
made  war  upon  Joafli  king  of  Ifrael,  and  thereby 
brought  a  great  flaughter  upon  Judah,  the  princes, 
that  is  the  fanhedrin,  combined  againft  him,  purfued 
him  to  Lachifli,  and  killed  him  there.  "^^ 

The  legifiative  power  of  Sparta  was  evidently  in 
the  people.  The  laws  that  go  under  the  name  of  Ly- 
curgus  *.  werepropofedbyhim  to  the  general  aflembly 
of  the  people,  and  from  them  received  their  authority: 
But  the  difcipline  they  contained  was  of  fuch  efficacy 
for  framing  the  minds  of  men  to  virtue,  and  by  banifli- 
ing  filver  and  gold  they  fo  far  banifhed  all  manner 
of  crimes,  that  from  the  inftitution  of  thofe  laws  to 
the  times  of  their  corruption,  which  was  more  than 
eight  hundred  years,  we  hardly  find  that  three  men 
were  put  to  death,  of  whom  two  were  kings;  fo 
that  it  feems  difficult  to  determine  where  the  power 
of  judging  did  refide,  tho'  'tis  moft  probable,  con- 
lidering  the  nature  of  their  government,  that  it  was 
in  the  fenate,  and  in  cafes  extraordinary  in  the  Ephori, 
with  a  right  of  appealing  to  the  people.  Their  kings 
therefore  could  have  little  to  do  with  the  fword  of 
juftice,  neither  the  legifiative  nor  the  judicial  power 
being  any  ways  in  them. 

The  military  fword  was  not  much  more  in 
their  power,  unlefs  the  excellency  of  their  virtues 

*  Plut.  vit.  Lycu»i 

G  3  gave 


S6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

gave  them  the  credit  of  perfuading,  when  the  law 
denied  the  right  of  commanding.  They  were  obli2;ed 
to  make  war  againft  thofe,  and  thofe  only,  who 
were  declared  enemies  by  the  fenate  and  Ephori^  and 
in  the  manner,  place  and  time  they  directed  :  fo 
that  Agefilaus,  tho'  carrying  on  a  glorious  war  in 
Perfia,  no  fooner  received  the  parchment  roil,  where- 
in he  was  commcindedby  the  Ephori  to  come  home 
for  the  defence  of  his  own  country,  than  he  imme- 
diately returned,  and  is  on  that  account  called  by  no 
lefs  a  man  than  Xenophon  ^,  a  good  and  faith- 
ful king,  rendring  obedience  to  tlie  lav/s  of  his 
/  country. 

By  this  it  appears  that  there  are  kings  who  may  be 
feared  by  thoie  that  do  ill,  and  not  by  fuch  as  do 
wdl ;  for  having  no  miore  power  than  what  the  law 
gives,  and  being  obliged  to  execute  it  as  the  law 
direfe,  tliey  cannot  depart  from  the  precept  of  the 
i^poftle.  My  ovs^n  adions  therefore,  or  the  fenfe  of 
my  own  guilt  arifing  from  them,  is  to  be  the  meafure 
of  my  fear  of  that  maglitrate  who  is  the  minifcer  of  God, 
and  not  his  power. 

The  like  may  be  faid  of  almoft  all  the  nations  of 
the  w^orld,  that  have  had  any  thing  of  civil  order 
amongft  them.  The  fupreme  magiftrate,  under 
w^hat  name  foever  he  was  known,  whether  king, 
emperor,  afymnetes,  fuffetes,  conful,  didator,  or 
archon,  has  ufually  a  part  affigned  to  him  in  the 
adminiftration  of  juflice  and  making  war  ;  but  that 
he  may  know  it  to  be  afligned  and  not  inherent,  and 
fo  affigned  as  to  be  employed  for  the  public  good, 
not  to  his  own  profit  or  pleafure,  it  is  circumfcribed 
by  fuch  rules  as  he  cannot  fafely  tranfgrefs.  This  is 
above  all  feen  in  the  Germian  nations,  from  whom 
v/e  draw  our  original  and  government^  and  is  fo  well 

♦  De  Reg.  Agcfil. 

defcribed 


Sea.  10.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       S; 

defcribed  by  Tacitus*  in  his  trcatilc  of  their  culloms 
and  manners,  that  I  fliall  content  mylclf  to  refer  to 
it,  and  to  what  I  have  cited  from  him  in  the  former 
part  of  this  work.  The  Saxons  coming  into  our 
country  retain'd  to  thcn.:ifehxs  the  fam.e  rights. 
They  had  no  l-iings  but  fuch  as  were  fet  up  by  tlicm- 
felves,  and  they  abrogated  their  power  when  they 
pleafed.  -f  OfFa  acknowledged  "  that  he  was  choka 
for  the  defence  of  their  hberty,  not  from  his  own 
merit,  but  by  their  favour  i"  and  in  the  Convei^itus 
PanangUcus,  at  which  all  the  chief  men  as  well 
fecular  as  eccleiiailical  were  prefent,  it  was  decreed 
by  the  king,  archbifhops,  bidiops,  abbots,  dukes 
and  fenators,  that  the  kings  fliould  be  chofen  by  the 
priefts,  and  by  the  elders  of  the  people.  In  purfu- 
ance  of  which,  Egbert,  who  had  no  right  to  the 
fuccefiion,  was  made  king,  Ethel werd  w^as  chofen 
in  the  fame  manner  J  by  the  confent  of  all.  Ethel- 
wolf  a  monk,  for  want  of  a  better^  was  advanced 
to  the  fame  honour.  His  fon  Alfred,  tho'  crowned 
by  the  pope,  and  marrying  without  the  confent  of 
the  nobility  and  kingdom  ||  againfh  their  cufloms  and 
ftatutes,  acknowledged  that  he  had  received  the  crown 
from  the  bounty  of  the  princes,  elders  and  people  ; 
and  in  his  will  declared  that  he  left  the  people  as  he 
had  found  them,  free  as  the  inward  thoughts  of  m.an. 
His  fon  Edward  §  was  elefted  to  be  his  fucceflbr. 
Ethelftan,  tho' a  baftard,  and,  without  all  title,  was 
eledled  by  the  confent  of  the  nobility  and  people. 
Eldred  by  the  fame  authority  was  elected  and  pre- 
ferred before  the  fons   of  Edmond  his  prcdecellor. 

*  De  morib.  Germ. 

f  A  J  iibcrcatis  vclirae  tuitionem  non  mch  merids,  fed  Tola  libciali- 
tate  veftra. 

;|;  Omnium  confenfu. 

II  Contra  morcm  S>:  rtatuta. 

^  SucceiTor  monarchiaeeleftus, 

G  4  Edwin, 


^ 


88  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

Edwin,  tho  rightly  chofen,  was  depofed  for  his  ill 
life,  and  Edgar  *  elected  king,  by  "  the  will  of  God, 
'*  and  confent  of  the  people."  But  he  alfo  was  de- 
prived of  the  crown  for  the  rape  of  a  r^un,  and  after 
feven  years  reflored  by  the  whole  people^  "  coram 
"  omni  multitudine  populi  Anglorum."  Ethelred 
who  is  faid  to  have  been  -f-  cruel  in  the  beginning, 
wretched  in  the  courfe,  and  infamous  in  the  end  of 
his  reign,  was  depofed  by  the  fame  power  that  had 
advanced  him.  Canutus  made  a  if  contrad:  with 
the  princes  and  the  whole  people,  and  thereupon 
was  by  general  confent  crown' d  king  over  all  Eng- 
land. After  him  Harold  was  chofen  in  the  ufual 
manner.  Ele  being  dead,  a  meffage  was  fent  to 
Hardi  Canute  with  an  offer  of  the  crown,  which 
he  accepted,  and  accordingly  was  received.  Edward 
the  confeffor  was  ||  elefed  king  with  the  confent  of 
the  clergy  and  people  at  London  -,  and  Harold  ex- 
cufed  himfelf  for  not  performing  his  oath  to  Wil- 
liam the  Norman,  becaufe  he  faid  he  had  made  it 
unduly  and  prefumptuoufly,  §  without  confulting 
the  nobility  and  people,  and  without  their  authori- 
ty. V/illiam.  was  received  with  great  joy  by  the 
clergy  and  people,  and  faluted  king  by  all,  fwear- 
ing  to  obferve  the  antient  good  and  approved  laws 
of  England  :  and  tho'  he  did  but  ill  perform  his 
oath,  yet  before  his  death  he  feemed  to  repent  of 
the  ways  he  had  taken,  and  only  wifhing  his  fon 
might  be  king  of  England,  he  confeffed  in  his  laft 
will  made  at  Caen  in  Normandy,  4-  that  he  neither 

*  Et  eligerunt  Deo  diftante  Edgarum  in  regem  annuente  populo. 

■\  Ssvus  in  principio,  mifcr  in  medio,  turpis  in  exitu. 

+  Canutus  fcedus  cum  principibus  &  cmni  populo,  &  ilH  cum  ipfo 
percufferunt. 

II  Annuente  clero  &  populo  Londini  in  regem  eligituf. 

^  Abfque  generali  fenatus  «S:  populi  cpnventu  &  edi6lo. 

Mc-.tth.  Pari/.  Gul.  Gemit,  ^c. 

4-  Neminem  Anglici   regni  conftituo  haredem,  non  enim  tantum 
decusha^reditario  jurepofiedi.     ibid, 

found 


Sea.  10,    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       89 

found  nor  left  the  kingdom  as  an  inheritance.  If 
he  poifeiTcd  no  right  except  what  was  conferred 
upon  him,  no  more  was  conferred  than  had  been 
enjoy'd  by  the  antient  kings  according  to  the  ap- 
proved laws  which  he  fwore  to  obferve.  Thofe  laws 
gave  no  power  to  any,  till  he  was  eledled ;  and  that 
which  they  did  then  give  was  fo  limited,  that  the 
nobility  and  people  referved  to  themfelves  the  difpo- 
lition  of  the  greateft  affairs,  even  to  the  depofition 
and  expulfion  of  fuch  as  Ibould  not  well  perform 
the  duty  of  their  oaths  and  office.  And  I  leave 
it  to  our  author  to  prove,  how  they  can  be  faid  to 
have  had  the  fword  and  the  power  fo  as  to  be  feared, 
otherwife  than,  as  the  apoftle  fays,  by  thofe  that 
do  evil;  which  we  acknowledge  to  be  not  only  in 
the  king,  but  in  the  lov/eft  officer  of  juftice  in  the 
world. 

If  it  be  pretended  that  our  later  kings  are  more 
to  be  feared  than  William  the  Norman,  or  his  pre- 
deceflbrs,  it  miuft  not  be,  as  has  been  proved,  either 
from  the  general  right  of  kings,  or  from  the  doc- 
trine of  the  apoftle,  but  from  fomething  elfe  that 
is  peculiar  and  fubfequent,  which  I  leave  our  author's 
difciples  to  prove,  and  an  anfv/er  may  be  found  in 
due  time.  But  to  fhow  that  our  anceftors  did  not 
miftake  the  words  of  the  apoftle,  'tis  good  to  con- 
fider  when,  to  w^hom,  and  upon  what  occafion  he 
fpoke.  The  Chriftian  religion  was  then  in  its  infancy: 
his  difcourfes  were  addreffed  to  the  profeffors  of  it, 
who  tho'  they  foongrewtobe  confiderable  in  number, 
were  for  the  moft  part  of  the  meaneft  fort  of  people, 
fervants  or  inhabitants  of  the  cities,  rather  than  ci- 
tizens and  freemen ;  joined  in  no  civil  body  or  fo- 
ciety,  nor  fuch  as  had  or  could  have  any  part  in  the 
government.  The  occafion  was  to  fupprefs  the  dan- 
gerous miftake  of  many  converted  Jews  and  others, 

who 


9o  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

who  knowing  themfelves  to  be  freed  from  the  power 
of  lin  and  the  devil,  prefumed  they  were  aho  freed 
from  the  obhgation  of  human  laws.  Ahd  if  this 
error  had  not  been  cropd  in  the  bud,  it  would  have 
given  occafion  to  their  enemies,  (who  deiired  no- 
thing more)  to  deftroy  them  all ;  and  who  know- 
ing that  fuch  notions  were  ilirring  among  them^ 
would  have  been  glad,  that  they  who  were  not 
ealily  to  be  difcovered,  had  by  that  means  difcover- 
ed  themfelves. 

This  induced  a  neceffity  of  diverting  a  poor,  mean, 
fcatter'd  people  from  fuch  thoughts  concerning  the 
ftate  5  to  convince  them  of  the  error  into  which  they 
were  fallen,  that  Chriftians  did  not  owe  the  fame 
obedience  to  civil  laws  and  magiftrates  as  other  men, 
and  to  keep  them  from  drawing  deftru6lion  upon 
themfelves  by  fuch  ways,  as  not  being  warranted  by 
God,  had  no  promife  of  his  protedion.  St.  Paul's 
work  was  to  preferve  the  profelfors  of  Chrillianity, 
as  appears  by  his  own  words ;  "  ''^  I  exhort,  that 
lirfl  of  all,  fupplications,  prayers,  interceflibns, 
and  giving  of  thanks  be  made  for  all  men :  for 
kings,  and  for  all  that  are  in  authority,  that  we 
may  live  a  quiet  and  peaceable  life  in  all  godlinefs 
and  honefty.  -f-  Put  them  in  mind  to  be  fabjed:  to 
principalities  and  powers,  to  obey  magiftrates, 
to  be  ready  for  every  good  v^ork."  St.  Peter 
agrees  with  him  fully  in  defcribing  the  magiftrate 
and  his  duty ;  fhewing  the  reafons  why  obedience 
iliould  be  pay'd  to  him,  and  teaching  Chriftians  to  be 
humble  and  contented  with  their  condition,  as  free, 
yet  not  ufing  their  liberty  for  a  cover  to  malice  ;  and 
not  only  to  fear  God  and  honour  the  king  (of  which 
conjunction  of  words  fuch  asFilmerare  very  proud) 
but  to  honour  all  men,  as  is  faid  in  the  fame  verfc. 

*  I  Tim.  ii,  f  Tit.  iii. 

2  This 


cc 

(C 

cc 
cc 


Sea.  lo.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        91 

This  was  in  a  peculiar  manner  the  work  of  that 
time,  in  which  thofe  w^ho  were  to  preach  and  pro- 
pagate the  gofpel,  were  not  to  be  diverted  from 
that  duty,  by  entangUng  themfelves  in  the  care  of 
ftate-affairs  ;  but  it  does  in  feme  fenfe  agree  with  all 
times :  for  it  can  never  be  the  duty  of  a  good  man 
to  oppofe  fuch  a  magifrrate  as  is  the  minifler  of  God, 
in  the  exercife  of  his  office,  nor  to  deny  to  any  m.an 
that  which  is  his  due. 

But  as  the  Chrifticin  law  exempts  no  man  from 
the  duty  he  owes  to  his  father,  mafler,  or  the  ma- 
gtllrate.,  it  does  not  make  him  more  a  flave  than  he 
was  before,  nor  deprive  him  of  any  natural  or  civil 
right;  and  if  we  are  obliged  to  pay  tribute,  honour, 
or  any  other  thing  where  it  is  not  due,  it  mufl;  be 
by  fome  precept  very    different  from  that  which 
commands  us  to  give  to  Casfar  that  which  is  Ca^far's. 
If  he  define  the  magiftrate  to  be  the  miniirer  of 
God  doing  juftice,  and  from  thence  draws  the  rea- 
fons  he  gives  for  rendring  obedience  to  him,  we  are 
to  inquire  whofe  minifter  he  is  who  overthrows  it, 
and  look  for  fome  other  reafon  for  rendring  obedi- 
ence to  him  than  the  words  of  the  apoftles.     If 
David,  who  was  willing  to  lay  down  his  life  for 
the  people,  who  ''  hated  iniquity,"  and  would  not 
*'  fuffer  a  liar  to  come  into  his  prefence,"  was  the 
minifter  of  God,  I  defire  to  know  whofe  minifter 
Caligula  was  who  let  up  himfelf  to  be  worfhipped 
for  a  God,  and  would  at  once  have  deftroyed  all  the 
people  that  he  ought  to  have  proteded  ?  Whofe 
minifter  was  Nero,    who,  beiides  the  abominable 
impurities  of  his  life,  and  hatred  to  all  virtue,  as 
contrary  to  his  perfon  and  government,  fet  fire  to 
the  great  city  ?  If  it  be  true,  that  '^  contrariorum 
contraria  eft  ratio,"  thefe  queftions  are  eafily  decid- 
ed 'y  and  if  the  reafons  of  things  are   eternal,  the 

fame 


92  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

fame  diflinftion  grounded  upon  truth  will  be  good 
for  ever.  Every  magiftrate,  and  every  man  by  his 
works,  will  for  ever  declare  whofe  minifter  he  is, 
in  what  fpirit  he  lives,  and  confequently  what  obe- 
dience is  due  to  him  according  to  the  precept  of  the 
apoftle.  If  any  man  a{k  what  I  mean  by  juftice, 
I  anfwer,  that  the  law  of  the  land,  as  far  as  it  is 
"  Sand:io  red:a,  jubens  honefta,  prohibens  contra- 
"  ria  ■*,''  declares  what  it  is.  But  there  have  been 
and  are  laws  that  are  neither  juft  nor  commendable. 
There  was  a  law  in  Rome,  that  no  God  fliould  be 
worfliipped  without  the  confent  of  the  fenate  :  upon 
which  TertuUian  fays  fcoffingly,  "  -f  That  God 
*'  fhall  not  be  God  unlefs  he  pleafe  man ;"  and 
by  virtue  of  this  law  the  firft  Chriftians  were  expofed 
to  all  manner  of  cruelties  -,  and  fome  of  the  empe- 
rors (in  other  refped:s  excellent  men)  moil  foully 
polluted  themfelves  and  their  government  with  in- 
nocent blood.  Antoninus  Pius  was  taken  in  this 
fnare ;  and  TertuUian  bitterly  derides  Trajan  for 
glorying  in  his  clemency,  when  he  had  commanded 
Pliny,  who  was  proconful  in  Afia,  not  to  make  any 
fearch  for  Chriftians,  but  only  to  punifli  them  ac- 
cording to  law  when  they  fliould  be  brought  before 
him.  No  municipal  law  can  be  more  firmly  efta- 
blifhed  by  human  authority,  than  that  of  the  inqui- 
lition  in  Spain,  and  other  places  :  and  thofe  accurf- 
ed  tribunals,  which  have  fhed  more  Chriftian  blood 
than  all  the  Pagans  that  ever  were  in  the  world,  is 
commonly  called  The  holy  office.  If  a  gentleman 
in  Poland  kill  a  peafant,  he  is  by  a  law  nov/  in  ufe 
free  from  punifhment,  if  he  lay  a  ducat  upon  the 
dead  body.  Evenus  the  third  of  Scotland,  caufed 
a  law  to  pafs^  by  which  the  wives  and  daughters  of 

*  Cicero. 
-j-  Nifi  homini  Deus  placucrjt  Deus  non  erit. 

noble^ 


Sea.  II.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       93 

noblemen  were  expofed  to  his  luft,  and  thofe  of  the 
commons  to  the  luft  of  the  nobility.  Thefe,  and  an 
infinite  number  of  others  like  to  them,  were  not 
right  fandtions,  but  fuch  as  have  produced  unfpeak- 
able  mifchiefs  and  calamities.  They  were  not  there- 
fore laws :  the  name  of  juftice  is  abufively  attributed 
to  them  :  thofe  that  govern  by  them  cannot  be 
the  minifters  of  God  :  and  the  apoftle  commanding 
our  obedience  to  the  minifter  of  God  for  our  good, 
commands  us  not  to  be  obedient  to  the  minifter 
of  the  devil  to  our  hurt;  for  we  cannot  ferve  two 
mafters. 

S    E    C    T.     XI. 

^hat  which  is  net  jufl^  is  not  law  ;  and  that  which 
is  not  law,  ought  net  to  be  obeyed, 

OU  R  author  having  for  a  long  time  pretended 
confcience,  now  pulls  off  his  mafk,  and  plain- 
ly tells  us,  that  'tis  not  on  account  of  confcience, 
but  for  fear  of  punifhment,  or  hopes  of  reward,  that 
laws  are  to  be  obeyed.     "  That  familiar  diftindtion 
of  the  fchoolmen,  fays  he,  whereby  they  fubjedl 
kings  to  the  diredtive,   but  not  to  the  coadive 
power  of  the  law,  is  a  confeflion,  that  kings  are 
not  bound  by  the  pofitive  laws  of  any  nation,  fince 
the  compulfory  power  of  law^s  is  that  which  pro- 
perly makes  laws  to  be  laws."     Not  troubling 
myfelf  with  this  diftindlion  of  the  fchoolmen,  nor 
acknowledging  any  truth  to  be  in  it,  or  that  they  are 
competent  judges  of  fuch  matters,  I  fay,  that  if  it 
be  true,  our  author's  conclufion  is  altogether  falfe ; 
for  the  diredtive  power  of  the  law,  which  is  certain, 
and  grounded  upon  the  inherent  good  and  redlitude 
that  is  in  it,  is  that  alone  which  has  a  power  over 
the  confcience,  whereas  the  coercive  is  merely  con- 

I  tingent  5 


<c 
<( 

<c 

(C 

<( 
(( 


94-         '        DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

tingent ;  and  the  moil  juft  powers  commanding  the 
moft  juft  things,  have  {o  often  fallen  under  the  vio- 
lence of  the  moit  unjufl:  men,  commanding  the  moft 
execrable  villanies,  that  if  they  were  therefore  to 
be  obeyed,  the  confciences  of  men  muft  be  regulated 
by  the  fuccefs  of  a  battle  or  confpiracy,  than  which 
nothing  can  be  affirmed  more  impious  and  abfurd. ' 
By  this  rale  David  v/as  not  to  be  obeyed,  when  by 
the  wickednefs  of  his  fon  he  was  driven  from  Jerufa- 
lem,  and  deprived  of  all  coercive  power ;  and  the 
confcientious  obedience  that  had  been  due  to  him 
was  transfer'd  to  Abfalom  who  fought  his  life. 
And  in  St.  Paul's  time  it  was  not  from  him  who 
was  guided  only  by  the  fpirit  of  God,  and  had  no 
manner  of  coercive  power,  that  chrifcians  were  to 
learn  their  duty,  but  from  Caligula,  Claudius,  and 
Nero,  v/ho  had  that  power  well  eftabliflied  by  the 
mercenary  legions.  If  this  were  (o,  the  governments 
of  the  world  might  bejuftly  called  Magna  Latroci- 
nia  ;  and  men  laying  aiide  all  confiderations  of  reafon 
or  juftice,  ought  only  to  follow  thofe  who  can  inflid: 
the  greateft  puniiliments,  or  give  the  greateft  rewards. 
But  fmce  the  reception  of  fuch  opinions  w^ould  be 
the  extirpation  of  all  that  can  be  called  good,  we 
muft  look  for  another  rule  of  our  obedience,  and 
Ihall  find  that  to  be  the  law,  which  being,  as  I  faid 
before,  Sand:io  Redla,  muft  be  founded  upon  that 
eternal  principle  of  reafon  and  truth,  from  whence 
the  rule  of  juftice  which  is  facred  and  pure  ought  to 
be  deduced,  and  not  from  the  depraved  will  of  man, 
which  fludluating  according  to  the  different  interefts, 
humours  and  paffions  that  at  feveral  times  reign  in 
feveral  nations,  one  day  abrogates  what  had  been 
enacted  the  other.  The  fand:ion  therefore  that  de- 
ferves  the  name  of  a  law,  '^  which  derives  not  its 

"  excellency 


Sedl.  IT.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       gs 

'^  excellency  from  antiquity,  or  from  the  dignity  of 
*^  the  legiflators,  but  from  on  intrinfic   equity  and 
"  juftice  *,"  ought  to  be  made  in  purfuance  of  that 
univerfal  reafon  to  which  all  nations  at  all  times  owe 
an  equal  veneration  and  obedience.     By  this  we  may 
know  whether  he  who  has  the  power  does  juftice  or 
not :  whether  he  be  the  minifter  of  God  to  our  good, 
a  protestor  of  good,  and  a  terror  to  ill  men  ;  or  the 
niinifter  of  the  devil   to   our  hurt,  by  encouragijig 
all  manner  of  evil,  and  endeavouring  by  vice  and 
corruption  to  make  the  people  worfe,  that  they  may   . 
be  miferable,  and  miferable  that  they  may  be  worfe. 
I  dare  not  fay  I  fliall  never  fear  fuch  a  man  if  he  be 
armed  with  power :  but  I  am  fure  I  fliall  never 
efteem  him  to  be  the  minifler  of  God,  and  fliall  think 
I  do  ill  if  I  fear  him.     If  he  has  therefore  a  coercive 
power  over  me,  'tis  through  my  weaknefs ;  "  for  -jf 
*'  hethat  will  fuffer  himfelf  tobe  compelFd,  knows 
"  not  how  to  die."     If  therefore  he  who  does  not 
follow  the  direftive  power  of  the  law,  be  not  the 
minifter  of  God,  he  is  not  a  king,  at  leaft  not  fuch 
a  king  as  the  apoftle  com.mands  us  to  obey :  and  if 
that  fandlion  which  is  not  juft  be  not  a  law,  and  can 
have  no  obligation  upon  us,  by  what  power  foever 
it  be  eftabliiLed,  it  mav  v^  ell  fall  out  that  the  ma- 
giilrate  who  will  not  follow  the  diredlive  pov\er  of 
the  law,  may  fall  under  the  coercive,  and  then  the 
fear  is  turned  upon  him,  with  this  aggravation,  that 
it  is  not  only  adtual,  but  juft.     This  was  the  cafe  of 
Nero  \  the  coercive  power  was  no  longer  in  him,  but 
again  ft  him.     He  that  was  forced  to  fly  and  to  hide 
himfelf,  that  vv'as  abandoned  by  all  men,  and  con- 
demned to  die  "  according  to  antient  cuftom  :{;,"  did, 
as  I  fuppofw,  fear,  and  was  no  way  to  be  feared.  The 

*  Tertul.  \  Qui  cogi  poteft  nefcit  mori. 

X  More  MajojUiH,     Sueiotis 

like 


g6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

like  may  be  faid  of  Amaziah  king  of  Judah,  when 
he  fled  to  Lachifh  -,  of  Nabuchodonofor,  when  he 
was  driven  from  the  fociety  of  men ;  and  of  many 
emperors  and  kings  of  the  greateft  nations  in  the 
world,  who  have  been  fo  utterly  deprived  of  all 
power,  that  they  have  been  imprifoned,  depofed, 
confined  to  monaftries,  kill'd,  drawn  through  the 
ftreets,  cut  in  pieces,  thrown  into  rivers,  and  in- 
deed fuffer'd  all  that  could  be  fufFer'd  by  the  vileft 
flaves. 

If  any  man  fay  thefe  things  ought  not  to  have 
been  done,  an  anfwer  may  be  given  in  a  proper 
place  ;  though  'twere  enough  to  fay,  that  the  juffice 
of  the  world  is  not  to  be  overthrown  by  a  meer 
affertion  without  proof;  but  that  is  nothing  to  the 
prefent  queftion :  for  if  it  was  ill  done  to  drive  Ne- 
ro to  defpair,  or  to  throw  Vitellius  into  the  com- 
m.on  fliore,  it  was  not  becaufe  they  were  the  mi- 
niflers  of  God ;  for  their  lives  were  no  way  con- 
formable to  the  characfler  which  the  apoftle  gives  to 
thofe  who  deferve  that  facred  name.  If  thole  only 
are  to  be  feared  who  have  the  power,  there  was  a 
time  when  they  were  not  to  be  feared,  for  they  had 
none ,  and  if  thofe  princes  are  not  obliged  by  the  law, 
who  are  not  under  the  coercive  power,  it  gave  no  ex- 
emption to  thofe,  for  they  fell  under  it :  and  as  we 
know  not  what  will  befal  others  who  walk  in  their 
fteps,  till  they  are  dead,  we  cannot  till  then  know 
whether  tliev  are  free  from  it  or  not. 


S  E  C  To 


Sea.  12,  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.        97 

SECT.     XII. 

The  7^ight  and  power  of  a  magi ftr ate  depends  upon  hii 
inftitution^  ?zot  upon  his  name, 

y'  I  "^  Is  ufaal  with  impoftors  to  obtrude  their 
Jl^  deceits  upon  men,  by  putting  falie  names 
upon  things,  by  which  they  may  perplex  mxcns 
minds,  and  from  thence  deduce  falfe  conclufions* 
But  the  points  above-mention'd  being  fettled,  it  im- 
ports little  whether  the  governors  to  whom  Peter 
enjoins  obedience,  were  only  kings,  and  fuch  as  are 
employed  by  them,  or  all  fuch  magiilrates  as  are  the 
minifters  of  God;  for  he  informs  us  of  their  works 
that  we  may  know  them,  and  accordingly  yield 
obedience  to  them.  This  is  that  therefore  which 
diftinguifhes  the  magiftrate  to  whom  obedience  is  due, 
from  him  to  whom  none  is  due,  and  not  the  name 
that  he  either  affumes,  or  others  put  upon  him. 
But  if  there  be  any  virtue  in  the  word  king^  and  that 
the  admirable  prerogatives,  of  which  our  author 
dreams,  were  annexed  to  that  name,  they  could 
not  be  applied  to  the  Roman  emperors,  nor  their 
fubftituted  officers,  for  they  had  it  not.  'Tis  true, 
Mark  Anthony,  in  a  drunken  fit,  at  the  celebration 
of  the  impure  Lupercalia,  did  offer  a  diadem  to 
Julius  Caefar,  w^hich  fome  flatterers  prefied  him  to 
accept,  (as  our  great  lawyers  did  Cromwxll)  but  he 
durft  not  think  of  putting  it  upon  his  head.  Cali- 
gula's affedation  of  that  title,  and  the  enfigns  of 
royalty  he  wore,  were  taken  for  the  m.oft  evident 
marks  of  his  madnefs :  and  tho'  the  greateft  and 
braveft  of  their  men  had  fallen  by  the  w^ars  or  pro- 
fcriptions ;  tho*  the  beft  part  of  the  fenate  had 
periflied  in  TheiTaly ;  tho'  the  great  city  was  ex- 
haufted,  and  Italy  brought  to  defolatlon,  yet  they 
Vol.  II,  H  were 


5^  D  I  S  C  O  ir  R  S  E  S         Chap.  TlU 

were  not  reduced  fo  low  as  to  endure  a  king.  Pifo 
was  fufficiently  addidted  to  Tiberius,  yet  he  could 
not  fufFer  that  German icus  fhould  be  treated  as  the 
ion  of  a  king  ;  "  Principis  Romani  non  Parthorum 
*'  regis  fiiio  has  epulas  dari*."  And  whoever  under- 
ftands  the  Latin  tongue,  and  the  hiftory  of  thofe 
times,  will  eafily  perceive  that  the  word  Princeps 
fignified  no  more  than  a  principal  or  eminent  man^ 
as  has  been  already  proved :  and  the  words  of  Pifo 
eould  have  no  other  meaning,  than  that  the  fon  of  a 
Roman  ought  not  to  be  diftinguiflied  from  others^. 
as  the  fons  of  the  Parthian  kings  were.  This  is 
verified  by  his  letter  to  Tiberius,  under  the  name  of 
fi*iend,  and  the  anfwer  of  Tiberius  promifing  to  him 
*^  whatfoever  one  friend  could  do  for  another  *j-.."' 
Here  was  no  mention  of  his  majefly  or  fovereiga 
lord,  nor  the  bafe  fubfcriptions  of  fervant,  fubjed:, 
or  creature.  And  I  fear,  that  as  the  laft  of  thofe 
words  was  introduced  amongft  us  by  our  bifhops,, 
the  reft  of  them  had  been  alfo  invented  by  fuch 
chriftians  as  were  too  much  addided  to  the  Afiatic 
llavery.  However,  the  name  of  king  was  never 
folemnly  affumed  by,  nor  conferred  upon  thofe 
emperors,  and  could  have  conferred  no  right,  if  it 
had.  They  exercifed  as  they  pleafed,  or  as  they 
durft,  the  power  that  had  been  gained  by  violence 
or  fraud.  The  exorbitances  they  committed,  could 
not  have  been  juflified  by  a  title,  any  more  than  thofe 
of  a  pirate  who  fliould  take  the  fame.  It  was  na 
otherwife  given  to  them  than  by  way  of  affimilation^ 
when  they  were  guilty  of  the  greateft  crimes :  and 
Tacitus  defcribing  the  deteftable  luft  of  Tiberius, 
lays,  "  Quibus  adeo  indomitis  exarfcrat,  ut  more 
"  regio  pubem  ingcnuam  ftupris  pollueret  3  nee  for- 

*  Tacit.  Ami.  2.  c.  c;.  -f  Quod  airJcus  amico  prssuare  potefi.  T^^icif, 

ma|j3j 


cc 


<c 
cc 


Scd.  12.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.       99 

mam  tantum  &  decora  corporis,  fed  in  his  modef- 
tarn  pueritiam,  in  aliis  majorum  imagines,  incita- 
mentum  cupiditatis  habebat  *.**  He  alfo  informs 
us  that  Nero  took  his  time  to  put  Bareas  Soranus  to 
death,  who  was  one  of  the  moft  virtuous  men  of 
that  age,  when  Tiridates  king  of  Armenia  was  at 
Rome  5  "  That  he  might  fhew  the  imperial  gran- 
deur by  the  flaughter  of  the  moft  illuftrious  intn, 
which  he  accounted  a  royal  adlion  -fJ*  I  leave  it 
to  the  judgment  of  all  wife  men,  whether  it  be 
probable  that  the  apoftles  fliould  diftinguifh  fuch  as 
thefe  from  other  magiftrates ;  and  dignify  thofe  only 
with  the  title  of  God's  minifters,  who  diftinguifhed 
themfelves  by  fuch  ways ;  or^  that  the  fucceeding 
emperors  ihould  be  ennobled  with  the  fame  preroga- 
tive, who  had  no  other  title  to  the  name  than  by 
refembling  thofe  that  had  it  in  fuch  things  as  thefe, 
if  this  be  too  abfurd  and  abominable  to  enter  into 
the  heart  of  a  man,  it  muft  be  concluded,  that 
their  intention  was  only  to  divert  the  poor  people  to 
whom  they  preached,  from  involving  themfelves  in 
the  care  of  civil  matters,  to  which  they  had  no  call. 
And  the  counfel  would  have  been  good  (as  things 
flood  v/ith  them)  if  they  had  been  under  the 
power  of  a  pirate,  or  any  other  villain  fubftituted  by 
him. 

But  tho'  the  apoftles  had  looked  upon  the  officers 
fet  over  the  provinces  belonging  to  the  Roman  em- 
pire, as  fent  by  kings,  I  deli  re  to  know  whether  it 
can  be  imagined,  that  they  could  think  the  fubordi- 
nate  governors  to  be  fent  by  kings,  in  the  countries 
that  had  no  kings  ;  or  that  obedience  became  due  to 
the  magiftrates  in  Greece,  Italy,  or  other  provinces 
under  the  jurifdidtion  of  Rome,  only  after  they  had 

*  Anna].!.  6.  c.  i. 

f  Ut  magnitudiiiem  imperatorlam  caede  inrigniam  virorum  quafi 
regio  facinore  oitentaret.     J?j.  L.  i6  c.  23, 

H  2  emperors, 


tdo  DISCOURSES        Cliap.  m* 

emperors,  and  that  none  was  due  to  them  before  ? 
The  Germans  had  then  no  king  :  the  brave  Armi- 
nius  had  been  lately  kill'd  for  aiming  at  a  crown. 
When  he  had  blemifh'd  all  his  virtues  by  that  at- 
tempt, they  forgot  his  former  fervices.  They  never 
confidered  how  many  Rorrian  legions  he  had  cut  in 
pieces,  nor  how  many  thoufands  of  their  allies  he 
had  deftroyed.  His  valour  was  a  crime  deferving 
death,  when  he  fought  to  make  a  prey  of  his  coun- 
try, which  he  had  fo  bravely  defended,  and  to  en- 
flave  thofe  who  with  him  had  fought  for  the  public 
liberty.  But  if  the  apoftles  were  to  be  underftood 
to  give  the  name  of  God's  minifters  only  to  kings, 
and  thofe  who  are  employed  by  them,  and  that  obe- 
dience is  due  to  no  other,  a  dbmeflic  tyrant  had  been, 
their  greateft  benefadlor.  He  had  fet  up  the  only 
government  that  is  authorized  by  God,  and  to  which 
a  confcicntious  obedience  Is  due.  Agathocles,  Dio- 
nyiius,  Phalaris,  Phaereus,  Pififtratus,  Nabis,  Ma- 
chanidas,  and  an  infinite  number  of  the  moft  deteft- 
able  villains  that  the  world  has  ever  produced,  did 
confer  the  fame  benefits  upon  the  countries  they  en- 
Ilaved.  But  if  this  be  equally  falfe,  fottifh,  abfurd, 
and  e:^ecrable,  all  thofe  epithets  belong  to  our  author 
and  his  dod:rine,  for  attempting  to  deprefs  all  mo- 
deft  and  regular  magiftracies,  and  endeavouring  to 
corrupt  the  fcripture  to  patronize  the  greateft  of 
crimes.  No  man  therefore  who  does  not  delight  in 
error,,  can  think  that  the  apoftle  defigned  precifely 
to  determine  fuch  queftions  as  might  arife  concern- 
ing any  one  man's  right,  or  in  the  leaft  degree  to 
prefer  any  one  form  of  government  before  another. 
In  acknowledging  the  magiftrate  to  be  man's  ordi- 
nance, he  declares  that  man  who  makes  him  to  be, 
may  make  him  to  be  what  he  pleafeth ;  and  tho' 
there  is  found  more  prudence  and  virtue  in  one  na^ 

lion 


S^a.  11.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      lox 

tion  than  in  another,  that  magiftracy  which  is  efta- 
bliflied  in  any  one  ought  to  be  obeyed,  till  they  who 
made  the  eftabUfliment  think  fit  to  alter  it.  All 
therefore  whilft  they  continue,  are  to  be  looked  up- 
on with  the  fame  refped.  Every  nation  afting  free- 
ly, has  an  equal  right  to  frame  their  own  govern- 
ment, and  to  employ  fuch  officers  as  they  pleafe. 
The  authority,  right  ^nd  power  of  thefe  muft  be 
regulated  by  the  judgment,  right  and  power  of  thofe 
who  appoint  them,  without  any  relation  at  all  to 
the  name  that  is  given  -,  for  that  is  no  way  elTential 
to  the  thing.  The  fame  name  is  frequently  given  to 
thofe,  who  differ  exceedingly  in  right  and  po\^er ; 
and  the  fame  right  and  power  is  as  often  annexed  to 
magiftracies  that  differ  in  name.  The  fame  power 
which  had  been  in  the  Roman  kings,  was  given  to 


the  confuls  ;  and  that  which  had  been  legally  in  the 
dictators  for  a  time  not  exceeding  fix  montlis,  was 
afterwards  ufurped  by  the  Caefars,  and  made  perpe- 
tual. The  fupreme  power  (which  fome  pretend 
belongs  to  all  kings)  has  been  and  is  enjoyed  in  the 
fiillefl  extent  by  fuch  as  never  had  the  name ;  and 
no  magiftracy  was  ever  more  reftrained  than  thofe 
tha,t  had  the  name  of  kings  in  Sparta,  Arragon,  Eng- 
land, Poland  and  other  places.  They  therefore  that 
did  thus  inftitute,  regulate  and  reftrain,  create  magi^ 
flracies,  and  give  them  names  and  powers  as  Teemed 
beft  to  them,  could  not  but  have  in  themfeives  the 
coercive  as  well  as  the  diredtlve  over  them  ,;  for  the 
regulation  and  reftridion  is  coercion ;  but  moft  of  all 
the  inftitution,  by  which  they  could  make  them  to 
be  or  not  to  be.  As  to  the  exterior  force,  'tis  fome- 
times  on  the  fide  of  the  magiftrate,  and  fbmetimes 
on  that  of  the  people ;  and  as  magiflrates  under  fe- 
veral  names  have  the  fame  v/ork  incumbent  upon 
jthem,  and  the  fame  power  to  perform  it^,  the  fame 

H  3  duty 


702  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

duty  Is  to  be  exac^ledfrom  them,  andrendred  to  them: 
which  being  diflindtly  proportion'd  by  the  laws  of 
every  country,  I  may  conclude,  that  all  magiftratical 
power  being  the  ordinance  of  man  in  purfuance  of  the 
ordinance  of  God,  receives  its  being  and  meafurefrom 
the  legiilative  power  of  every  nation.  And  whether 
the  power  be  placed  fimply  in  one,  a  few,  or  many 
men  -,  or  in  one  body  compofed  of  the  three  fimple 
fpecies ;  whether  the  iingle  perfon  be  called  king, 
duke,  marquifs,  emperor,  fultan,  mogul,  or  grand 
lignior  5  or  the  number  go  under  the  name  of  fenate, 
council,  pregadi,  diet,  aflembly  of  eftates  and  the 
like,  'tis  the  fame  thing.  The  fame  obedience  is 
equally  due  to  all,  w^hilft,  according  to  the  precept  of 
the  apoftle,  they  do  the  work  of  God  for  our  good  : 
and  if  they  depart  from  it,  no  one  of  them  has  a  bet- 
ter title  than  the  other  to  our  obedience. 

SECT.      XIII. 

IfO^iOS  were  made  to  dire^  and  inftruB  magijlratcs^ 
andy  if  they  will  not  he  dircdied^  to  rcjirain 
them. 

Knovv^  not  who  they  are  that  our  author  intro- 
duces to  fay,  that  *'  the  firft  invention  of  lav/s 
*'  v/as  to  bridle  or  moderate  the  overgreat  power  of 
*^  kings  j"  and  unlefs  they  give  fome  better  proof  of 
their  judgment  in  other  things,  fl:iall  little  efteem 
them.  They  {hould  have  confidered,  that  there  are 
laws  in  many  places  where  there  are  no  kings  3  that 
there  were  laws  in  many  before  there  were  kings,  as 
in  Ifrael  the  law  was  given  three  hundred  years  be- 
fore they  had  any ;  but  moft  efpecially,  that  as  no 
man  can  be  a  rightful  king  except  by  law,  nor  have 
any  juft  power  but  from  the  law,  if  that  power  be 
found  to  be  overgreat,  the  law  that  gave  it  muft 

have 


Ci. 


Sea.  13.     CONCERNING  GOYERNMENT.     log 

have  been  before  that  which  was  to  moderate  or  re- 
train it ;  for  that  could  not  be  moderated  which. 
was  not  in  being.     Leaving  therefore  our  author  to 
fight  with  thefe  adverfaries  if  he  pleafe  when  he 
finds  them,  I  fliall  proceed  to  examine  his  own  po- 
fitions.     *'  The  truth  is,  fays  he,    the  original  of 
laws  was  for  the  keeping  of  the  multitude  in  orden 
Popular  eftates  could  not  fubfiit  at  all  without 
laws,    w^hereas  kingdoms  v/ere  govern'd  manj'' 
ages  without  them.     The  people  of  Athens,  as 
foon  as  they  gave  over  kings,  were  forced  to  give 
power  to  Draco  firft,  then  to  Solon  to  make  them 
-^^  laws."     If  we  will  believe  him  therefore,  "where- 
foever  there  is  a  king,  or  a  man  w^ho  by  having 
power  in  his  hands,  is  in  the  place  of  a  king,  there  is 
no  need  of  law.     He  takes  them  all  to  be  io  wife, 
iuft,  and  good,  that    they  are  laws  to    themfelves^ 
Leges  viventes.     This  was  certainly  verified  by  the 
whole  fucceilion  of  the  Caifars,  the  ten  laft  kings  of 
Pharamond's  race,  all  the  fucceiTors  of  Charles  the 
.great,  and  others  that  I  am  not  willing  to  name^ 
but  referring  myfelf  to  hiflory,  I  defire  all  reafon- 
able  men  to  confider,  whether  the  piety  and  tender 
care  that  was  natural  to  Caligula,  Nero  or  Domitian, 
was  fuch  a  fecurity  to  the  nations  that  lived  under 
them,  as  without  law  to  be  fufhcient  for  their  pre- 
fervation  :  for  if  the  contrary  appear  to  be  true,  and 
that  their  government  w^as  a  perpetual  exercife  of 
rage,  malice  and  madncfs.  by  which  the  w^orft  of 
men  were  armed  v.dth  power  to  defa'oy  the  befl,  fo 
that  the  empire  could  only  be  faved  by  their  deflruc- 
tion,  'tis  moil:  certain^  that  mankind  can  never  fall  into 
a  condition  which  iiands  more  in  need  of  laws  to 
protedl  the  innocent,  than  when  fuch  monfters  reign 
who  endeavour  their  extirpation,  and  are  too   well 
fui'iiifhed  with  means  to  accomplifli  tlxeir  deteftable 

H  4  defigns* 


104  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ilf. 

defigns.  Without  any  prejudice  therefore  to  the  caufe 
that  I  defend,  I  might  confefs  that  all  nations  were 
at  the  firft  governed  by  kings,  and  that  no  laws  were 
impofed  upon  thofe  kings,  till  they,  or  the  fucceflbrs 
of  thofe  who  had  been  advanced  for  their  virtues, 
by  falling  into  vice  and  corruption,  did  manifeftly 
difcover  the  inconveniencies  of  depending  upon  their 
will.  Belides  thefe,  there  are  alfo  children ^  women 
and  fools,  that  often  come  to  the  fucceffion  of  king- 
doms, whofe  weaknefs  and  ignorance  ftands  in  as 
great  need  of  fupport  and  diredion,  as  the  defperate 
fury  of  the  others  can  do  of  reftridion.  And  if 
fome  nations  had  been  fo  fottiih,  not  to  forefee  the 
mifchief  of  leaving  them  to  their  will,  others,  or 
the  fame  in  fucceeding  ages  difcovering  them,  could 
no  more  be  obliged  to  continue  in  fo  pernicious  a  folly, 
than  we  are  to  live  in  that  wretched  barbarity  in  which 
the  Romans  found  our  anceftors,  when  they  firft 
entred  this  ifland. 

If  any  mian  fay,  that  Filmer  does  not  fpeak  of 
monfters,  nor  of  children,  women  or  fools,  but  of 
wife,  juft  and  good  princes;  I  anfwer,  that  if  there 
be  a  right  inherent  in  kings,  as  kings,  of  doing 
what  they  pleafe^  and  in  thofe  who  are  next  in  blood, 
to  fucceed  them  and  inherit  the  fame,  it  muft  belong 
to  all  kings,  and  fuch  as  upon  title  of  blood  would 
be  kings.  And  as  there  is  no  family  that  may  not, 
and  does  not  often  produce  fuch  as  I  mentioned,  it 
muft  alfo  be  acknowledged  in  them^  and  that  power 
which  is  left  to  the  wife,  juft  and  good,  upon  a 
fuppofition  that  they  will  not  m.ake  an  ill  ufe  of  it, 
mull  be  devolved  to  thofe  who  will  not  or  cannot 
make  a  good  one ;  but  will  either  malicioufly  turn  it 
to  the  deftrudtion  of  thofe  they  ought  to  proted:,  or 
through  weaknefs  fuffer  it  to  fall  into  the  hands  of 
thofe  that  govern  them,  who  are  found  by  experience 

to 


Sea.  13.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      105 

to  be  for  the  moft  part  the  woril  of  all,  moft  apt  to 
ufe  the  hafeft  arts,  and  to  flatter  the   humours,  and 
foment  the  vices  that  are  moft  prevalent  in  v^eak  and 
vicious  princes.      Germanicus,    Corbulo,    Valerius 
Afiaticus,    Thrafeas,    Soranus,    Helvidius   Prifcus, 
Julius  Agricola,  and  other  excellent  men   lived  in 
the  times  of  Tiberius,  Caligula,  Claudius  and  Nero ; 
but  the  power  was  put  into  the  hands  of  Sejanus, 
Macro,  Tigellinus,  and  other  villains  like  to  them: 
and  I  wilh  there  were  not  too  many  modern  ex- 
amples to  fhew  that  weak  and  vicious  princes  will 
never  choofe  fuch  as  fhall  preferve  nations  from  the 
mifchiefs  that  would  enfue  upon  their  own  incapaci- 
ty or  malice ;  but  that  they  m.uft  be  impofed  upon 
them  by  fome  other  power,  or  nations  be  ruined  for 
want  of  them.     This  impofition  muft  be  by  law  or 
by  force.   But  as  laws  are  made  to  keep  things  in  good 
order  without  the  necefTity  of  having  recourfe  to 
force,  it  woujd  be  a  dangerous  extravagance  to  arm 
that  prince  \'vith  force,    which  probably  in  a  fliort 
time  muft  be  oppofed  by  force ,  and  thofe  who  have 
been  guilty  of  this  error,  as  the  kingdoms  of  the  eaft, 
and  the  antient  Roman  empire,  where  no  provifion 
was  made  by  law  againft  ill-governing  princes,  have 
found  no  other  remedy  than  to  kill  them,  when  by 
extreme  fufferings  they  v/ere  driven  beyond  patience : 
and  this  fell  out  fo  often,  that  few  of  their  princes 
were  obferved  to  die  by  a  common  death.     But  fince 
the  empire  was  tranfmitted  to  Germany,  and  the 
emperors  reftrain'd  by  laws,  that  nation  has  never 
been  brought  to  the  odious  extremities  of  fuffering 
allmanner  of  indignities,  or  revenging  them  upon  the 
heads  of  princes.     And  if  the  pope  had  not  difturb'd 
them  upon  the  account  of  religion,  nor  driven  their 
prirxes  to  difturb  others,  they  might  have  palled 

many 


loS  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill: 

many  ages  without  any  civil  diiTcntion,  and  all  their 
emperors  might  have  lived  happily,  and  died  peace- 
ably, as  moft  of  them  have  done. 

This  might  be  fafficient  to  my  purpofe :  for  if 
all  princes  without  diftinftion,  whether  good  or  bad, 
wife  or  foolifli,  young  or  old,  fober  or  mad,  cannot 
be  intruded  v/ith  an  unlim^ited  power ;  and  if  the 
power  they  have,  ought  to  be  limited  by  law,  that 
nations  may  not,  with  danger  to  themfelves  as  well 
as  to  the  prince,  Iiave  recourfc  to  the  laft  remedy, 
this  law  muft  be  given  to  all,  and  the  good  can  be 
no  otherwif.  diftinguifhed  from  the  bad,  and  the 
wife  from  the  fooliili,  than  by  the  obfervation  or 
violation  of  it.  But  I  may  juftiy  go  a  ftep  farther, 
and  affirm,  that  this  law  v/hich  by  reftraining  the 
lufts  of  the  vicious  and  fcolifh,  frequently  preferves 
them  from  the  deftrudlion  they  would  bring  upon 
themfelves  or  people,  and  fometimes  upon  both,  is 
an  affiftance  and  diredtion  to  the  wifeft  and  beft ;  fo 
that  they  alfo  as  well  as  the  nations  under  them  are 
gainers  by  it.  This  will  appear  ftrange  only  to 
thofe  who  know  not  *  *  *  how  difficult  and  infup- 
"  portable  the  government  of  great  nations  is,"  and 
how  unable  the  beft  man  is  to  bear  it.  And  if  it 
furpafs  the  ftrength  of  the  beft,  it  may  eafily  be  de- 
termined how  ordinary  men  will  behave  themfelves 
under  it,  or  what  ufe  the  worft  will  make  of  it.  I 
know  there  have  been  wife  and  good  kings ;  but 
they  had  not  an  abfolute  power,  nor  would  have  ac- 
cepted it,  tho'  it  had  been  offer'd  :  much  lefs  can  I 
believe  that  any  of  them  would  have  tranfmitted 
fuch  a  power  to  their  pofterity,  when  none  of  them 
could  know  any  more  than  Solomon,  whether  his 
fon  v/ould  be  a  wife  man  or  a  fool.  But  if  the  beft 
might  have  delired,  and  had  been  able  to  bear  it 

*  Qtiam  grave  &  intokrandum  fi:  cunfla  re gendi  onu5.    Tadf. 

(tho* 


Sea.  13.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      107 

(tho*'Mofes  by  his  ov/n  confeffion  was  not  that) 
could  be  no  reafon  why  it  fliould  be  given  to  the 
worft  and  weakeft,  or  thofe  who  probably  will  be 
{o.     Since  the  affarance  that  it  will  not  be  abufed 
during  the  life  of  one  man,  is  nothing  to  the  con- 
ftitution  of  a  ftate  which  aims  at  perpetuity.     And 
no  man  knowing  what  men  v/ill  be,  efpecially  if 
they  come  to  the  power  by  facceffion,  which  may 
properly  enough  be  called  by  chance,  'tis  reafonably 
to  be  feared  they  will  be  bad,  and  confequently  ne- 
ceilary  fo  to  limit  their  power,  that  if  they  prove  to 
be  fo,  the  commonwealth  may  not  be  deftroy'd, 
which  they  were  inftituted  to  preferve.     The  law 
provides  for  this  in  leaving  to  the  king  a  full  and 
ample  power  of  doing  as  much  good  as  his  heart 
can  wiih,  and  in  refiiraining  his  power  fo,  that  if 
he  fhould  depart  from  the  duty  of  his  office,   the 
nation  may  not  perifh.     This  is  a  help  to  thofe  who 
are  wife  and  good,  by  direfting  them  what  they  are 
to  do,  more  certainly  than  any  one  mxan's  perfonal 
judgment  can  do ;  and  no  prejudice  at  all,  lince  no 
fuch  man  did  ever  complain  he  was  not  fuffer'd  to 
do  the  evil  which  he  would  abhor  if  it  were  in  his 
power  ;  and  is  a  moft  neceffary  curb  to  the  fury  of 
bad  princes,  preventing  them  from  bringing  deftruc- 
tion  upon  the  people.     Men  are  fo  fubjed:  to  vices 
and  pafTicns,  that  they  ftand  in  need  of  fom.e  re- 
flraint  in  every  condition  ;  but  moft  efpecially  when 
they  are  in  pov/er.     The  r.ige  of  a  private  man  may 
be   pernicious  to  one  or  a  few  of  his  neighbours ; 
but  the  fury  of  an  unlimited  prince  would  drive 
whole  nations  into  ruin  :  and  thofe  very  men  who 
have  lived  modeftly  when  they  had  little  power  have 
often  ptoved  the  moft  favage  of  all  monfters,  when 
they  thought  nothing  able  to  rcfift  their  rage.     'Tis 

faid 


joS  DISCOURSES        Chap,  im 

faid  of  Caligula,  that  no  man^ver  knew  "  *  a  bet- 
*'  ter  fervant,  nor  a  worfe  mailer."  The  want  of 
reflraint  made  liim  a  beaft,  who  might  have  conti- 
nued to  be  a  man.  And  tho'  I  cannot  fay,  that  our 
law  neceffarily  admits  the  next  in  blood  to  the  fuc- 
ceiiion  (for  the  contrary  is  proved)  yet  the  facility  of 
our  anceiiors,  in  receiving  children,  women,  or  fuch 
men  as  were  not  more  able  than  themfelves  to  bear 
the  weight  of  a  crov/n,  convinces  me  fully,  tlaat 
they  had  fo  framed  our  laws,  that  even  children, 
women,  or  ill  men,  might  either  perform  as  much 
as  was  neceffarily  required  of  them,  or  be  brought 
to  reafon  if  they  tranfgreffed,  and  arrogated  to  them- 
felves more  than  was  allow 'd.  For  'tis  not  to  be 
imagined,  that  a  company  of  m^en  fhould  fo  far  de- 
generate from  their  own  nature,  which  is  reafon,  to 
give  up  themfelves  and  their  pofterity,  with  all 
their  concernments  in  the  world,  to  depend  upon  the 
will  of  a  child,  a  u^oman,  an  ill  man,  or  a  fool. 

If  therefore  laws  are  neceffary  to  popular  ftates, 
they  are  no  lefs  to  monarchies  -,  or  rather,  that  is 
not  a  ftate  or  government  which  has  them  not :  and 
'tis  no  lefs  impoffible  for  any  to  fubfift  without 
them,  than  for  the  body  of  a  man  to  be,  and  per*- 
form  its  functions  without  nerves  and  bones.  And 
if  any  people  had  ever  been  £0  foolifli  to  eftablifh 
that  which  they  called  a  government,  without  law.s 
to  fu'pport  and  regulate  it,  the  impoffibility  of  fub- 
iifting  would  evidence  the  madneis  of  the  conftitu- 
tion,  and  ought  to  deter  all  others  from  following 
their  example. 

Tis  no  lefs  incredible,  that  thofe  nations  which 
rejefled  kings,  did  put  themfelves  into  the  power 
of  one  man,  to  prefcribe  to  them  fuch  laws  as  he 

*  Nee  meliorem  fervum^  nee  dcteriorcm  dominum. 

Tc;c.  Jn.  L  6.  c.  20. 

4  plcafed. 


SA  I  J.    CONCERNING  GOVERNiVIENT.    lo^ 

pleafed.     But  the  inftances  alledgcd  by  our  author 
are  evidently  falfe.     The  Athenians  were  not  with- 
out laws  when  they  had  kings :  iEgeus  was  fubjed: 
to  the  laws,  and  did  nothing  of  importance  without 
the  confent  of  the  people ;  and  Thefeus  not  being 
able  to  pleafe  them,  died  a  baniihed  man  :  Draco 
and  Solon  *  did  not  make,  but  propofe  laws,  and 
they  were  of  no  force  till  they  were  eflablifhed  by 
the  authority  of  the  people.     The  Spartans  dealt  in 
the  fame  manner  with  Lycurgus ;  he  invented  their 
laws,  but  the  people  made  them :  and  when  the 
affembly  of  all  the  citizens  had  approved  and  fworn 
to  obferve  them  till  his  return  from  Crete,  he  re- 
folved  rather  to  die  in  a  voluntary  banifliment,  than 
by  his  return  to  abfolve  them  from  the  oath  they  had 
taken.     The  Romans  alfo  had  laws  during  the  go- 
vernment of  their  kings  ;  but  not  finding  in  them 
that  perfecftion  they  defired,    the  decemviri  were 
chofen  to  frame  others,  which  yet  were  of  no  value 
till  they  were  paiTed  by  the  people  in  the  -f  Comitia 
Centuriata ;  and  being  fo  approved,  they  were  efta- 
blifhed.     But  this  fanftion,  to  which  every  man, 
whether  magiftrate  or  private  citizen,  w^as  fubjed:, 
did  no  way  bind  the  whole  body  of  the  people,  who 
ftill  retained  in  themfelves  the  power  of  changing 
both  the  matter  and  the  form  of  their  government, 
as  appears  by  their  inftituting  and  abrogating  kings, 
confuls,    dictators,    tribunes  with  confular   power, 
and  decemviri,  when  they  thought  good  for  the 
commonwealth.     And  if  they  had  this  power,    I 
leave  our  author  to  fhew,  why   the  like  is  not  in 
other  nations. 

*  Plut.  vit.  Solon. 
•     -f-  Ingenti  hominum  expe£latIone  propofitis  decern  tabulis  populum 
ad  concionera  convocaruRt,  &;  quod  bonuni,    fauilum  fa^lixque  ilt   re- 
pub  icce,  ipfis,  liberifque  eorum  eilet,  iie    ^-   legere    leges  propoiitas 
jullere.     f.  Liv.  /.  3.  c.  34,. 

:  S  E  C  T. 


no  D  I  S  C  O  U  R  S^E  S        Chap.  Ill, 

SECT.     XIV. 

Laws  are  not  made  by  kings ^  not  hecaiife  they  are 
biijled  in  greate'r  matters  than  doing  jujlice^  but 
becaufe  nations  will  be  governed  by  rule^  and  not 
arbitrarily, 

OUR  author  purfuing  the  miftakes  to  which 
he  feems  perpetually  condemned,  fays,  that 
*'  when  kings  were  either  bufied  in  war,  or  dif- 
"  tradled  with  pubiick  cares,  fo  that  every  private 
*'  man  could  not  have  accefs  unto  their  perfons,  to 
"  learn  their  wills  and  pleafures,  then  of  neceflity 
**  were  laws  invented,  that  io  every  pai'ticular  fub- 
*'  Jed:  might  find  his  prince's  pleafure."  I  have 
often  heard  that  governments  were  eftablifhed  for 
the  obtaining  of  juftice ;  and  if  that  be  true,  'tis 
hard  to  imagine  what  bufinefs  a  fupreme  magiftrate 
can  have  to  divert  him  from  accomplifliing  the  prin- 
cipal end  of  his  inftitution.  And  'tis  as  commonly 
faid,  that  this  diftribution  of  juftice  to  a  people,  is 
a  work  furpaiiing  the  ftrength  of  any  one  man. 
*  Jethro  feems  to  have  been  a  wife  man,  and  'tis 
probable  he  thought  Mofes  to  be  fo  alfo  5  but  he 
found  the  work  of  judging  the  people  to  be  too 
heavy  for  him,  and  therefore  advifed  him  to  leave 
the  judgment  of  caufes  to  others  who  fhould  be 
chofen  for  that  purpofe ;  v/bich  advice  Mofes  ac- 
cepted, and  God  approved.  The  governing  power 
was  as  infupportable  to  him  as  the  judicial.  He 
dcfired  rather  to  die  than  to  bear  fo  great  a  burden ; 
and  God  neither  accufing  him  of  floth  or  impati- 
ence, gave  him  feventy  affiftants.  But  if  we  may 
believe  our  author,  tlie  powers  judicial  and  legifla- 
tive,  that  of  judging  as  well  as  that  of  governing, 

*  Exod.    xviii. 

4  '  is 


Seel.  14.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,     n^ 

is  not  too  much  for  any  man,  woman,  or   child 
whatfoever :  and  that  he  ftands  in  no  need,  either 
of  God's  ftatutes  to  dired  him,   or  man's  counfel 
to  affift  him,  unlefs  it  be  when  he  is  otherwife  em- 
ploy'd  J  and  his  will  alone  is  fufficient  for  all.     But 
what  if  he  be  not  bufied  in  greater  matters,  or  dif- 
traded  with  public  cares ;  is  every  prince  capable  of 
this  work  ?  Tho*  Mofes  had  not  found  it  too  great 
for  him,  or  it  fhould  be  granted  that  a  man  of  ex- 
cellent natural  endowments,  great  wifdom,  learnings 
experience,  induftry,  and  integrity  might  perform  it, 
is  it  certain  that  all  thofe  who  happen  to  be  born  in 
reigning  families  are  fo  ?  If  Mofes  had  the  law  of 
God  before  his  eyes,  and  could  repair  to  God  him- 
felf  for  the  application  or  explanation  of  it ;  have 
all  princes  the  fameaffiflance?  Do  they  all  fpeak 
with  God  face  to  face,  or  can  they  do  what  he  did^ 
without  the  afliftance  he  had  ?  If  all  kings  of  ma- 
ture years  are  of  that  perfedlion,  are  we  affured  that 
none  fhall  die  before  his  heir  arrive  to  the  fame  ^  Or  ' 
fhall  he  have  the  fame  ripenefs  of  judgment  in  his 
infancy  ?  If  a  child  come  to  a  crown,    does  that 
immediately  infufe  the  moft  admirable  endowments 
and  graces  ?  Have  we  any  promife  from  heaven,, 
that  women  fliall  enjoy  the  fam.e  prerogatives  in 
thofe  countries  where  they  are  made  capable  of  the 
•fucceffion?  Or  does  that  law  which  renders  them 
capable,  defend  them,  not  only  againft  the  frailty 
of  their  own  nature,  but  confer  the  moft  fublime 
virtues  upon  them  ?  But  who  knows  not,  that  no 
families  do  more  frequently  produce  weak  or  ill 
men,  than  the  greateft  ?  and  that  which  is  worfe, 
their  greatnefs  is  a  fnare  to  them  -,  [o  that  they  who 
in  a  low  condition  might  have  pafTed  unregarded, 
being  advanced  to  the  higheft,  have  often  appeared 
to  be^  or  became  the  worfl  of  all  beafts  s  and  they 

who 


112  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

who  advance  them  are  like  to  them :  for  if  the 
power  be  in  the  multitude,  as  our  author  is  forced  to 
confefs  (otherwife  the  Athenians  and  Romans  could 
not  have  given  all,  as  he  fays,  nor  a  partj  as  I  fay, 
to  Draco,  Solon,  or  the  decemviri)  they  muft  be 
beafts  alfo,  who  ihould  have  given  away  their  right 
and  liberty,  in  hopes  of  receiving  juftice  from  fuch 
as  probably  will  neither  underfland  nor  regard  it,  or 
prote(!rtion  from  thofe  who  will  not  be  able  to  help 
themfelves,  and  exped:  fuch  virtue,  wifdom,  and 
integrity  fliould  be,  and  for  ever  remain  in  the  fa- 
mily they  fet  up  as  was  never  known  to  continue  in 
any.  If  the  power  be  not  conferred  upon  them, 
they  have  it  not  3  and  if  they  have  it  not,  their 
want  of  leifure  to  do  juftice,  cannot  have  been  the 
caufe  for  which  laws  are  made ;  and  they  cannot  be 
the  lignification  of  their  will,  but  are  that  to  which 
the  prince  owes  obedience,  as  well  as  the  meaneft 
fubjefl.  This  is  that  which  Bra(3:on  calls  "  effe  fub 
lege,"  and  fays,  that  *'  Rex  in  regno  fuperiores 
habet  Deum  &  legem."  Fortefcue  fays,  the 
kings  of  England  cannot  change  the  laws*:  and  in- 
deed, they  are  fo  far  from  having  any  fuch  power, 
that  the  judges  fwear  to  have  no  regard  to  the  king's 
letters  or  commands,  but  if  they  receive  any,  to 
proceed  according  to  law,  as  if  they  had  not  been. 
And  the  breach  of  this  oath  does  not  only  bring  a- 
blemifh  upon  their  reputation,  but  expofes  them  to 
capital  punifliments,  as  many  of  them  have  found. 
'Tis  not  therefore  the  king  that  makes  the  law,  but 
the  law  that  makes  the  king.  It  gives  the  rule  for 
fucceflion,  making  kingdoms  fometimes  hereditary, 
and  fometimes  elective,  and  (more  often  than  either 
fmiply)  hereditary  under  condition.  In  fome  places 
males  only  are  capable  of  inheriting,  in  others  fe- 

*  De  laud,  leg  Angl.  c,  9, 

males 


<c 


Sea.  14.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     113 

males  are  admitted.  Where  the  monarchy  is  regu- 
lar, as  in  Germany,  England,  Sec.  the  kings  ean 
neither  make  nor  change  laws  :  they  are  under  the 
law,  and  the  law  is  not  under  them  ;  their  letters 
or  commands  are  not  to  be  regarded  :  in  the  admini- 
flration  of  juftice,  the  queftion  is  not  what  pleafes 
them,  but  what  the  law  declares  to  be  right,  which 
muft  have  its  courfe,  whether  the  king  be  bufy  or 
at  leilure,  whether  he  will  or  not.  The  king  who 
never  dies,  is  always  prefent  in  the  fupreme  courts, 
and  neither  knows  nor  regards  the  pleafure  of  the 
man  that  wears  the  crown.  But  left  he  by  his 
riches  and  power  might  have  fome  influence  upon 
judicial  proceedings,  the  great  charter  that  reca- 
pitulates and  acknowledges  our  antient  inherent  li- 
berties, obliges  him  to  fwear,  that  he  will  neither 
fell-,^  delay,  nor  deny  juftice  to  any  man,  according 
to  the  laws  of  the  land  :  which  were  ridiculous  and 
abfurd,  if  thofe  laws  were  only  the  fignification  of 
his  pleafure,  or  any  way  depended  upon  his  will. 
This  charter  having  been  confirmed  by  more  than 
thirty  parliaments,  all  fucceeding  kings  are  under  the 
obligation  of  the  fame  path,  or  muft  renounce  the 
benefit  they  receive  from  our  laws,  which  if  they 
do^  they  will  be  found  to  be  equal  to  every  one  of 
us. 

Our  author,  according  to  his  cuftom,  having  laid 
dowq  a  falfe  propofition,  goes  about  to  juftify  it  by 
falfe  examples,  as  thofe  of  Draco,  Solon,  the  de- 
cemviri, and  Mofes,  of  v/hom  no  one  had  the 
power  he  attributes  to  them,  and  it  were  nothing  to 
us  if  they  had.  The  Athenians  and  Romans,  as 
was  faid  before,  were  fo  far  from  refigning  the  ab- 
folute  power  without  appeal  to  themfelves,  that  no- 
thing done  by  their  magiftrates  was  of  any  force, 
till  it  was  enaded  by  the  people.     And  the  power 

Vol.  IL  I  given 


114  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

given  to  the  decemviri,  line  provocatione^  was  only 
in  private  cafes,  there  being  no  fuperior  magiftrate 
then  in  being,  to  whom  appeals  could  be  made. 
They  were  veiled  v/ith  the  fame  pov/et'  the  kings 
and  didators  enjoy 'd,  from  whom  there  lay  no  ap- 
peal, bat  to  the  people,  and  always  to  them  3  as  ap- 
pears by  thq  cafe  of  Horatius  in  the  time  of  Tullus 
Hoftilius,  that  of  *  LVIarcus  Fabius  when  Papirias 
Curfor  was  diclator,  and  of  -f-  Nenius  the  tribune 
during    that    of    Q^  Fabius    Maximus,  all   which 

'I  have  cited  already,  and  refer  to  them.  There  was 
therefore  a  refervation  of  the  fupreme  power  in  the 
people,  notwithftanding  the  creation  of  magiftrates 
without  appeal  j  and  as  it  Vv^as  quietly  exercifed  in 
making  Grangers,  or  whom  they  pleafed  kings,  re- 
ftrainlng  the  power  of  diftators  to  fix  months,  and 
that  of  the  decemviri  to  two  years ;  when  the  lafl 
did,  contrary  to  law^  endeavour  by  force  to  conti- 

.  nue  their  power,  the  people  did  by  force  deflroy  it 
and  them. 

The  cafe  of  Mofes  is  yet  more  clear :  he  was  the 
moil  humble  and  gentle  of  all  men  :  he  never  raifed 
Ills  heart  above  his  brethren,  and  commanded  kings 
to  live  in  the  fame  modelty :  he  never  defired  the 
people  fliould  depend  upon  his  will :  in  giving  laws 
to  them  he  fulfili'd  the  will  of  God,  not  his  own ; 
an.d  thofe  laws  were  not  the  fignification  of  his  will, 
but  the  will  of  God.  They  were  the  produdion  of 
God's  wifdom  and  goodnefs,  not  the  invention  of 
man  ;  given  to  purify  the  people,  not  to  advance 
rhe  glory  of  cheir  leader.  He  was  not  proud  and 
infolent,  nor  pleas'd  with  that  oftentation  of  pomp, 
to  which  fools  give  the  name  of  majefty  ;  and  who- 
ever fo  far  exalts  the  power  of  a  man,  to  make 
nations  depend  upon  his  plealiii'e,  does  not  only  lay 

*  T.  Liv.l  I.  j  L.  3. 


Sea.  14.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      115 

a  burden  upon  him,  which  neither  Mofes,  nor  any- 
other  could  ever  bear,  and  evei-y  wife  man  will  al- 
ways abhor,  but  with  an  impious  fury,  endeavours 
to  let  up  a  government  contrary  to  the  laws  of  God, 
prefumes  to  accufe  him  of  want  of  wifdom,  or 
goodnefs  to  his  own  people,  and  to  corred:  his  errors, 
which  is  a  w^ork  fit  to  be  undertaken  by  f  jch  as  our 
author. 

From  hence,  as  upon  a  folid  foundation,  he  pro- 
ceeds, and  making  ufe  of  king  James's  words,  in- 
fers, that  kings  are  above  the  laws,  becaufe  he  f© 
teaches  us.  But  he  might  have  remembred,  that 
having  affirmed  the  people  could  not  judge  of  the 
difputes  that  might  happen  between  them  and  kings, 
becaufe  they  muft  not  be  judges  in  their  own  cafe, 
'tis  abfurd  to  make  a  king  judge  of  a  cafe  fo  nearly 
concerning  himfelf,  in  the  decifion  of  which  his 
own  paiTions  and  interefts  may  probably  lead  him 
into  errors.  And  if  it  be  pretended  that  1  do  the 
fame,  in  giving  the  judgment  of  thofe  matters  to 
the  people,  the  cafe  is  utterly  diifereni:,  both  in  the 
nature  and  confequences.  The  king's  judgment  is 
merely  for  himfelf;  and  if  that  were  to  take  place, 
all  the  paffions  and  vices  that  have  mod  power 
upon  men,  would  concur  to  corrupt  it.  He  that  is 
fet  up  for  the  public  good,  can  have  no  conteft  with 
the  whole  people  whofe  good  he  is  to  procure,  un- 
lefs  he  defie(5t  from  the  end  of  his  infdtution,  and 
fet  up  an  intereft  of  his  own  in  oppofition  to  if* 
This  is  in  its  nature  the  highefc  of  all  delinquencies  5 
and  if  llich  an  one  may  be  judge  of  his  own  crimes, 
he  is  not  only  fure  to  avoid  puniihment,  but  to  ob- 
tain all  that  he  fought  by  them  -,  and  the  worfe  he 
is,  the  more  violent  v/ill  his  deflres  be,  to  get  all 
the  power  into  his  hands,  that  I'le  may  gratify  hiii 
lulls,  and  execute  his  pernicious  defigns.     Cn  the^ 

I  2  othet 


ii6  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

other  fide,  in  a  popular  affembly,  no  man  judges 
for  himfelf,  otherwife  than  as  his  good  is  compre- 
hended in  that  of  the  pubUc :  nothing  hurts  him, 
but  what  is  prejudicialto  the  commonwealth:  fuch 
amongft  them  as  may  have  received  private  injuries, 
are  fo  far  only  confidered  by  others,  as  their  fuffer- 
ings  may  have  influence  upon  the  pubHc  -,  if  they 
be  few,  and  the  matters  not  great,  others  v/ill  not 
futFer  their  quiet  to  be  difturbed  by  them ;  if  they 
are  many  and  grievous,  the  tyranny  thereby  appears 
to  be  fo  cruel,  that  the  nation  cannot  fubfift,  unlefs 
it  be  corredled  or  fupprefs'd.     Corruption  of  judg- 
ment proceeds  from  private  paffions,  which  in  thefe 
cafes  never  govern :  and  tho'  a  zeal  for  the  public 
good  may  pofTibly  be  mifguided,  yet  till  it  be  fo,  it 
can  never  be  capable  of  excefs.     The  lail;  Tarquin, 
and  his  lewd  fon,  exercifed  their  fury  and  luft  in 
the  murders  of  the  beft  men  in  Rome,  and  the  rape 
of  Lucretia.     Appius  Claudius  was  filled  with  the 
like  madnefs.      Caligula  and  Nero  were  fo  well 
eftablifhed  in  the  power  of  committing  the  worft 
of  villanies,  that  we  do  not  hear  of  any   man  that 
offered  to  defend  himfelf,  or  woman  that  prefumed 
to  refufe  them.     If  they  had  been  judges  in  thefe 
cafes,  the  utmoft  of  all  villanies  and  mifchiefs  had 
been  eftabliflied  by  law :  but  as  long  as  the  judg- 
ment of  thefe  matters  was  in  the  people,  no  private 
or  corrupt  paffion  could  take  place.    Lucius  Brutus, 
Valerius,  Horatius  and  Virginius,  with  the  people 
that  followed  them,  did  not  by  the  expulfion  of  the 
kings,  or  the  fuppreflion  of  the  decemveri,  affumc 
to   themfelves  a  power  of  committing  rapes  and 
murders,    nor  any  advantages  beyond  what  their 
equals  might  think  they  deferved  by  their  virtues, 
and  fervices  to  the  commonwealth ;  nor  had  they 
more  credit  than  others  for  any  other  reafon,  than 

that 


Sed.  14.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,      iiy 

that  they  fliewed  themfeh^es  moil  forward  in  pro- 
curmg  the  public  good,  and  by  their  valour  arid  con- 
dudl  beft  able  to  promote  it. 

Whatfoever  happen'd  after  the  overthrow  of  their 
liberty,  belongs  not  to  my  fubjed:,  for  there  was 
nothing  of  popularity  in  the  judgments  that  were 
made.  One  tyrant  deftroy'd  another;  the  fame 
pa/fions  and  vices  for  the  moft  part  reigned  in  both : 
the  laft  was  often  as  bad  as  his  predecefTor  whom 
'he  had  overthrown ;  and  one  was  fometimes  ap- 
proved by  the  people  for  no  other  reafon,  than  that 
it  was  thought  impoffible  for  him  to  be  worfe  than 
he  who  was  in  pofTeffion  of  the  power.  But  if  one 
inftance  can  be  of  force  amongft  an  infinite  number 
of  various  accidents,  the  words  of  Valerius  Afia- 
ticus,  who  by  wifhing  he  had  been  the  man  that 
had  kill'd  Caligula,  did  in  a  moment  pacify  the  fury 
of  the  foldiers  who  were  looking  for  thofe  that  had 
done  it,  fhew,  that  as  long  as  men  retain  any  thing 
of  that  reafon  which  is  truly  their  nature,  they 
never  fail  of  judging  rightly  of  virtue  and  vice ; 
whereas  violent  and  ill  princes  have  always  done  the 
contrary,  and  even  the  beft  do  often  defied:  from  the 
rules  of  juftice,  as  appears  not  only  by  the  ex- 
amples of  Edward  the  firft  and  third,  who  were 
brought  to  confefs  it,  but  even  thofe  of  David  and 
Solomon. 

Moreover  to  fliew  that  the  decifion  of  thefe  con- 
trover  fies  cannot  belong  to  any  king,  but  to  the 
people,  we  are  only  to  confider,  that  as  kings  and 
all  other  magiftrates,  whether  fupreme  or  fubordi- 
mte,  are  conftituted  only  for  the  good  of  the  people, 
the  people  only  can  be  fit  to  judge  whether  the  end 
be  accomplifhed.  A  phyfician  does  not  exercife  his 
art  for  himfelf,  but  for  his  patients;  and  when  I  am, 
or  think  I  fhall  be  fick,  I  fend  for  him  of  whom  I 

I  3  hav« 


% 


ii8  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

have  the  beft  opinion,  that  he  may  help  me  to  re- 
cover, or  prefer ve  my  health  5  but  I  lay   him  afide 
if  I  iind  him  to.be  negligent,  ignorant,  or  unfaithful ; 
and  it  v^^ouid  be  ridiculous  for  him  to  fay,  I  make 
my  felf  judge  in  my  own  cafe,  for  I  only,  or  fuch  as 
I  (hall  confult,  am  fit  to  be  judge  of  it.     He  may  be 
treacherous,  and  thro'  corruption  or  malice  endeavour 
to  Doifon  me    or  have  other  defedls  that  render  him 
unfit  to   be  trufted  :  but  I    cannot   by  any  corrupt 
paffion  be  ledvv^ilfliUy  todo  him  injuftice,  and  if  Imif- 
take,  'tis  only  to  my  own  hurt.    The  like  may  be  faid 
of  lawyers,  ftewards,  pilots,  andgenerally  of  allthat 
do  not  aft  for  themfelves,  but  for  thofe  who  employ 
them.     And  if  a  com.pany  going   to   the   Indies, 
fhould  find  that  their  pilot  was  m.ad,    drunk,  or 
treacherous,    they  whofe  lives  and  goods  are  con- 
cerned, can  only  be  fit  to  judge,  whether  he  ought 
to  be  trufred  or  not,  fince  he  cannot  have  a  right  to 
deftroy  thofe  he  was  chofen  to  preferve  •  and  they 
cannot  be  thought  to  judge  perverfely,  becaufe  they 
have  nothing  to  lead  them  but  an  opinion  of  truth, 
and  cannot  err  but  to  their  own  prejudice.    In  the  like 
manner,  not  only  Solon  and  Draco,  but  Romulus, 
Numa,  Hoftilius,  the  confuls,  diclators,    and  de- 
cemviri, were  not  diftinguilhed  from  od:iers,  that  it 
might  be  well  with  them,  ''  fed  ut  bonum,  f^Hx, 
**  fauftumque  fit  populo  Romano,"  but  that   the 
profperity  and  happmefs  of  the  people  might  be  pro- 
cured ;  which  being  the  thing  always  intended,  it 
were  abfurd  to  refer  the  judgment  of  the  performance 
to  him  who  is  fufpecfted  of  a  defign  to  overthrow  it, 
and  v/hofe  pallions,  interefls,  and  vices,  if  he  has 
any,  lead  him  that  way.     If  king  James  faid  any 
thing  contrary  to  this,  he  might  be  anfwered  with 
{erne  of  his  own  words  3  "  I  was,"  fays  he,  "  fworn 

*'  to 


Sea.  r5.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      119 

*«  to  maintain  the  laws  of  the  land,  and  therefore 
*'  hadbeenperjuredif Ihadbro'en  them*."  It  mav 
alfo  be  prefumed,  he  had  not  forgotten  what  his 
mafter  Buchanan  had  taught  in  the  books  he  wrote 
chiefly  for  his  inftrudtion^j-,  that  the  violation  of  the 
laws  of  Scotland  could  not  have  been  io  fatal  to  moft 
of  his  predecefTors,  kingsof  that  country  (nor  as  lie 
himfelf  had  made  them  to  his  mother)  if  kings  as 
kings  were  above  them  j. 

SEC    T.     XV. 

,A  general  prefumption  that  Jungs  .^ivill  govern  we!J^ 
is  not  a  fufficient  jecurity  to  the  people, 

BUT/'  fays  our  author,  '^  yet  will  they  rule 
their  fubjedls  by  the  law;  and  a  king  govern- 
ing in  a  fettled  kingdom,  leaves  to  be  a  king;, 
^'  and  de-eenerates  into  a  tyrant,  fo  foon  as  he  ceafes 
*'  to  rule  according;  unto  his  laws:  vet  where  he  fees 
'*  them  rigorous  or  doubtfnl,  he  may  mitigate  or 
*'  interpret."  This  is  therefore  an  effecl  of  their 
goodnels :  they  are  above  laws,  but  wVA  rule  by  law, 
we  have  Filmer's  word  for  it.  But  I  know  not  how 
nations  can  be  aiTured  their  princes  will  always  be  fo 
good:  goodnefs  is  always  accompanied  with  wifdom, 
and  I  do  not  find  thofe  admirable  qualities  to  be 
generally  inherent  or  entail'd  upon  fupreme  magil- 
trates.  They  do  not  feem  to  be  all  alike,  and  we 
have  not  hitherto  found  them  all  to  live  in  the  fame 
•fpirit  and  principle.  I  can  fee  no  reiemblajice  be- 
tween Mofes  and  Caligula,  Jofliua  and  Claudius, 
Gideon  and  Nero,  Samfon  and  Vitellius,  Sanmel  and 
Otho,  David  and  Domitian  ;  nor  indeed  between 
the  beft  of  thefe  and  their  own  children.     If  the 

*  "  Speech  in  ftar  chamber,   1616."         f  Hill   S,ot. 
J  De  jure  rcg.  apud  Scot, 

I  4  fons 


X20  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

fons  of  Mofes  and  Jofliua  had  been  like  to  them  in 
wifdom,  valour  and  integrity,  'tis  probable  they  had 
been  chofen  to  fucceed  them  ;  if  they  were  not, 
the  like  is  lefs  to  be  prefumed  of  others.  No  man 
has  yet  obferved  the  moderation  of  Gideon  to  have 
been  in  Abimelech  ;  the  piety  of  Eli  in  Hophni  and 
Phineas ;  the  purity  and  integrity  of  Samuel  in  Joel 
and  Abiah,  nor  the  wifdom  of  Solomon  in  Rehobo- 
am.  And  if  there  was  fo  vaft  a  difference  between 
them  and  their  children,  who  doubtlefs  were  in- 
ftrudted  by  thofe  excellent  men  in  the  ways  of  wif- 
dom and  juftice,  as  well  by  precept  as  example,  wxre 
it  not  madnefs  to  be  confident,  that  they  who  have 
neither  precept  nor  good  example  to  guide  them, 
but  on  the  contrary  are  educated  in  an  utter  ignorance 
or  abhorrence  of  all  virtue,  will  always  be  ]u{i  and 
good  ;  or  to  put  the  whole  power  into  the  hands  of 
every  man,  womaU;,  or  child  that  ihall  be  born  in 
governing  families,  upon  a  fuppofition,  that  a  thing 
will  happen,  which  never  did  -,  or  that  the  w^eakeil 
and  worft  will  perform  all  that  can  be  hoped,  and 
was  feldom  accomplifhed  by  the  wifeft  and  befl, 
expofing  whole  nations  to  be  deftroy'd  w^ithout  reme- 
dy, if  they  do  it  not?  And  if  this  be  madnefs  in  all 
extremity,  'tis  to  be  prefumed  that  nations  never 
intended  any  fuch  thing,  unlefs  our  author  prove  that 
all  nations  have  been  mad  from  the  beginning,  and 
mufi:  always  continue  to  be  fo.  To  cure  this,  he 
fays,  "  They  degenerate  into  tyrants ;"  and  if  he 
meant  as  he  fpeaks,  it  would  be  enough.  For  a 
king  cannot  degenerate  into  a  tyrant  by  departing  from 
that  law,  which  is  only  the  produ6l  of  his  own  will. 
But  if  he  dp  degenerate,  it  muft  be  by  departing 
from  that  which  does  not  depend  upon  his  will,  and 
is  a  rule  prefcribed  by  a  pov^'cr  that  is  above  him. 
This  indeed  is  the  dodrine  of  Bra6ton,  w^ho  having 

.    faid 


Sea.  15-    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      121 

fald  that  the  power  of  the  king  is  the  power  of. 
the  law,  becaufe  the  law  makes  him  king,  adds, 
cc  ^  That  if  he  do  injaftice,  he  ceafes  to  be  king, 
*^  degenerates  into  a  tyrant,  and  becomes  the  vice- 
^'  gerent  of  the  devil."  But  I  hope  this  muft  be 
underftood  with  temperament,  and  a  due  confide- 
ration  of  human  frailty,  fo  as  to  mean  only  thofe 
injuries  that  are  extreme  ;  for  other  wife  he  would 
terribly  (hake  all  the  crowns  of  the  world. 

But  left  our  author  fliould  be  thought  once  la 
his  life  to  have  dealt  fincerely,  and  fpoken  truth, 
the  next  lines  lliew  the  fraud  of  his  laft  alTertion,  by 
giving  to  the  prince  a  power  of  ''  mitigating  or  in- 
"  terpreting  the  laws  that  he  fees  to  be  rigorous  or 
''  doubtful."  But  as  he  cannot  degenerate  into  a 
tyrant  by  departing  from  the  law  which  proceeds 
from  his  own  will,  fo  he  cannot  mitigate  or  inter- 
pret that  which  proceeds  from  a  fuperior  power, 
unlefs  the  right  of  mitigating  or  interpreting  be  con- 
ferred upon  him  by  the  fame.  For  as  all  wife  men 
confefs  that  ''  -f- none  can  abrogate  but  thgfe  who, 
"  may  inftltute,"  and  that  all  mitigation  andinter* 
pretation  varying  from  the  true  ftnfc  is  an  alteration, 
that  alteration  is  an  abrogation  3  for  J  whatfoever  is 
changed  is  diffolved,  and  therefore  the  power  of 
mitigating  is  infeparable  from  that  of  inftituting. 
This  is  fufficiently  evidenced  by  Henry  the  eighth's 
anfwer  to  the  fpeech  made  to  him  by  the  fpeaker  of 
the  houfe  of  commons  1545,  in  which  he,  tho* 
one  of  the  moft  violent  princes  we  ever  had,  con- 
feffes  the  parliament  to  be  the  law-makers,  and  that 
an  obligation  lay  upon  him  rightly  to  ufe  the  power 
with  which  he  v/as  entrufted.     The  right  therefore  - 

*  Quia  fi  faciat  injuriam  definit  effe  rex,  &  degenerat  in  tvjannum^ 
&  fit  vicarius  diaboli.     Brai^. 

f  Cujus  eft  inftituere,  ejus  eft  abrogare. 
X  Quiccjuid  mutatur  diftblvitur,  intern -ergo. 

of 


122  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

sof  altering  being  infeparable  from  that  of  making 
laws,  the  one  being  in  the  parliament,  the  other 
muft  be  fo  alio.  Fortefcue  fays  plainly,  the  king 
cannot  change  any  law :  Magna  Charta  cafts  all 
upon  *  the  laws  of  the  land  and  cuftoms  of  Eng- 
land :  but  to  fay  that  the  king  can  by  his  will  make 
that  to  be  a  cuflom  or  an  antient  law,  which  is  not, 
or  that  not  to  be  fo  which  is,  is  moft  ablurd.  He 
mnft  therefore  take  the  laws  and  cudoms  as  he 
finds  them,  and  can  neither  detra6l  from,  nor  add 
any  thing  to  them.  The  ways  are  prefcribed  as 
well  as  the  end.  Judgments  are  given  by  equals, 
per  pares.  The  judges  who  may  be  aflifling  to  thofe, 
are  fworn  to  proceed  according  to  law,  and  not  to 
regard  the  king's  letters  or  commands.  The  doubt- 
ful cafes  are  referred,  and  to  be  referred  to  the  parlia- 
ment, as  in  the  ftatute  of  3  5  Edw.  III.  concerning  trea- 
fons;  but  never  to  the  king.  The  law  intending  that 
thefe  parliaments  Ihould  be  annual,  and  leaving  to 
the  king  a  power  of  calling  them  more  often,  if 
occaiion  require,  takes  away  all  pretence  of  a  ne- 
ceffity  that  there  fliould  be  any  other  power  to  in- 
terpret or  mitigate  laws.  For  'tis  not  to  imagined 
that  there  iliould  be  fuch  a  peftilent  evil  in  any  anti- 
ent law,  cuflom,  or  later  a6l  of  parliament,  which 
being  on  the  fudden  difcover'd  may  not  without  any 
great  prejudice  continue  for  forty  days,  till  a  parlia- 
ixient  may  be  called  -,  whereas  the  force  and  effence 
of  all  laws  would  be  fubverted,  if  under  colour  of 
mitigating  and  interpreting,  the  power  of  altering 
were  allow'd  to  kings,  who  often  want  the  inclina- 
tion, and  for  the  moft  part  the  capacity  of  doing  it 
rightly.  'Tis  not  therefore  upon  the  uncertain  will 
or  underflanding  of  a  prince,  that  the  fafety  of  a 
nation  ought  to  depend.     He  is  fometimes  a  child, 

*  Leges  terrae  &  confuetudmes  AnglicC, 

and 


Sea.  15.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     123 

and  fometimes  ovcrburden'd  with  years.  Some  are 
weak,  negligent,  flothiul,  fool ifh  or  vicious  :  others, 
who  may  have  fomething  of  rectitude  in  their  in- 
tentions, and  naturally  are  not  incapable  of  doing 
well,  are  drawn  out  of  the  right  w-ay  by  thefubtil- 
ty  of  ill  men  who  gain  credit  with  them.  That 
rule  muft  alv/ays  be  uncertain,  and  fubjed:  to  be 
diftorted,  wd:iich  depends  upon  the  fancy  of  fuch  a 
man.  He  always  fluctuates,  and  every  pafiion  that 
arifes  in  his  mind,  or  is  infufed  by  otliers,  diforders 
him.  The  good  of  a  people  ouriit  to  be  eflabliflied 
upon  a  more  folid  foundation.  For  this  reafon  the 
law  is  eftabhihed,  v/hich  no  paffion  can  difturb. 
'Tis  void  of  defire  and  fear,  lufl  and  anc'er.  'Tis 
Mens  fine  affe(flu,  written  reafon,  retaining  fome 
m.eafure  of  the  divine  perfedtion..  It  does  not  enjoin 
that  which  pleafes  a  weak,  frail  man,  but  without 
any  regard  to  perfons  commands  that  which  is  good, 
and  punifhes  evil  in  all,  w^hether  rich  or  poor,  high 
or  low.     'Tis  deaf,  inexorable,  inflexible. 

By  this  means  every  man  knows  when  he  is  fafe 
or  in  danger,  becaufe  he  knows  whether  he  has 
done  good  or  evil.  But  if  all  depended  upon  the 
will  of  a  m^an,  the  word  would  be  often  the  moft 
fafe,  and  the  befl:  in  the  greateft  hazard  :  flaves 
would  be  often  advanced,  the  crood  and  the  brave 


fcorn'd  and  neglefed.  The  mofl  generous  nations 
have  above  all  thinp:s  foueht  to  avoid  this  evil :  and 
the  virtue,  wifdom  and  generofity  of  each  may  be 
difcern'd  by  the  right  fixing  of  the  rule  that  mufl: 
be  the  guide  of  every  man's  life,  and  fo  conflitut- 
ing  their  magiftracy  that  it  may  be  duly  obferved. 
S"Mch  as  have  attained  to  this  perfedlon,  have  always 
flourifhed  in  virtue  and  happinefs :  They  are,  as 
Ariftotle  fays,  governed  by  God^   rather  than  by 

men. 


124  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill- 

men,  whilfl  thofe  who  fubjedled  themfelves  to  the 
will  of  a  man  were  governed  by  a  beaft. 

This  being  fo,  our  author's  next  claufe,  that 
*'  tho'  a  king  do  frame  all  his  aflions  to  be  accord- 
ing unto  law,  yet  he  is  not  bound  thereunto, 
but  as  his  good  will,  and  for  good  example,  or  fo 
*"'  far  forth  as  the  general  law  for  the  fafety  of  the 
"  commonwealth  doth  naturally  bind  him,'*  is 
wholly  impertinent.  For  if  the  king  who  governs  not 
according  to  law,  degenerates  into  a  tyrant,  he  is 
obliged  to  frame  his  actions  according  to  law,  or  not 
to  be  a  king  ;  for  a  tyrant  is  none,  but  as  contrary  to 
him,  as  the  worft  of  men  is  to  the  beft.  But  if 
thefe  obligations  were  untied,  we  may  eafily  guefs 
what  fecurity  our  author's  word  can  be  to  us,  that 
the  king  of  his  own  good  will,  ^nd  for  a  good 
example,  will  framfe  his  adlions  according  to  the 
laws ;  when  experience  inftrudts  us,  that  notwith- 
ftanding  the  ftrideft  laws,  and  moft  exquifite  con- 
ftitutions,  that  men  of  the  beft  abilities  in  the  world 
could  ever  invent  to  reftrain  the  irregular  appetites  of 
thofe  in  power,  with  the  dreadful  examples  of  ven- 
geance taken  againft  fuch  as  would  not  be  reftrained, 
they  have  frequently  broken  out ;  and  the  moft 
powerful  have  for  the  moft  part  no  otherwife 
diftinguifhed  themfelves  from  the  reft  of  men,  than 
by  the  enormity  of  their  vices,  and  being  the  moft 
forward  in  leading  others  to  all  manner  of  crimes  by 
their  example. 


SECT. 


Sea,  i6.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      125 

SECT.      XVI. 

^he  obfervation  of  the  laws  of  nature  is  ahfurdly 
expeBedfrom  tyrants^  whofet  themfehes  up  agai?iji 
all  laws  r  and  he  that  fubjeEls  kings  to  no  other 
law  than  what  is  common  to  tyrants^  dejiroys  their 
being. 

OU  R  author's  laft  claufe  acknowledging  kings 
to  be  bound  by  a  general  law  to  provide   for 
the  fafety  of  the  people,  would  be  fufficient  for  my 
purpofe  if  it  were  fincere ;  for  municipal  laws  do 
only  iliew  how  that  {hould  be  performed :    and  if 
the  king  by  departing  from  that  rule  degenerates,  as 
he  fays,  into  a  tyrant,  'tis  eafily  determined  what 
ought  then  to  be  done  by  the  people.     But  his  whole 
book  being  a  heap  of  contradidions  and  frauds,  we 
can  rely  upon  nothing  that  he  fays :  and  his  follow- 
ing words,  which  under  the  fame  law  comprehend 
both  kings  and  tyrants,  fliew  that  he  intends  kings 
ihould  be  no  otherwife  obliged  than  tyrants,  which 
is,  not  at  all.     ''  By  this  means,''  fays  he,  "  are  all 
kings,  even  tyrants   and   conquerors,    bound  to 
preferve  the  lands,  goods,  liberties  and  lives  of 
all  their  fubjeds,  not  by  any  municipal  law  of  the 
land,  fo  much  as  by  the  natural  law  of  a  father, 
which  obligeth  them  to  ratify  the  adls  of  their 
forefathers  and  predeceffors  in  things  neceflary  for 
the  public  good  of  their  fubjeds."      If  he  be 
therefore  in  the  right,  tyrants  and  conquerors  are 
kings  and  fathers.     The  words  that  have  been  al- 
ways thought  to  comprehend  the  moft  irreconcileable 
contrariety,  the  one  expreffing  the  moft  tender  love 
and  care,  evidently  teftified  by  the  greateft  obligati- 
ons conferred  upon  thofe  that  are  under  it  •  the  other 
the  utmoil  of  all  injuries  that  can  be  offer *d  to  men, 

fignify 


(C 
C( 

<c 


126  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

fignify  tlie  fame  thing :  there  is  no  difference  between 
a  magiftrate  who  is  what  he  is  by  law,  and  a  public 
enemy,  who  by  force  or  fraud  fets  himfelf  up  againft 
all  law:  and  what  he  faid  before,  that  kings  degene- 
rated into  tyrants,  fignifies  nothing,  for  tyrants  alfo 
are  kings. 

His  next  words  are  no  lefs  incomprehenfible;  for 
neither  king  nor  tyrant  can  be  obliged  to  preferve  the 
lands,  goods  and  liberties  of  their  fubjeds  if  they 
have  none.  But  as  liberty  confiils  only  in  being  fub^ 
je6t  to  no  man's  will,  and  nothing  denotes  a  flave  but 
a  dependence  upon  the  will  of  another ;  if  there  be 
no  other  law  in  a  kingdom  than  the  will  of  a  prince, 
there  is  no  fuch  thing  as  liberty.  Property  alfo  is 
an  appendage  to  liberty  5  and  'tis  as  imp>offible  for  a 
man  to  have  a  riglit  to  lands  or  goods,  if  he  has  no 
liberty,  and  enjoys  his  life  only  at  the  pleafure  of 
another,  as  it  is  to  enjoy  either  when  he  is  deprived 
of  them.  He  therefore  who  fays  kings  and  tyrants 
are  bound  to  preferve  their  fubjeds  lands,  liberties, 
goods  and  lives,  and  yet  lays  for  a  foundation,  that 
laws  are  no  more  than  the  fignifications  of  their  plea- 
fure, feeks  to  delude  the  world  with  \vords  which 
fignify  nothing. 

The  vanity  of  thefe  whimfeys  will  farther  appear, 
if  it  be  confidered,  that  as  kings  are  kings  by  law, 
and  tyrants  are  tyrants  by  overthrowing  the  law,  they, 
are  moil  abfurdly  joined  together*  and  'tis  not  more 
ridiculous  to  fct  him  above  the  law,  who  is  what  he 
is  by  the  law,  than  to  expect  the  obfervation  of  the 
laws  that  enjoin  the  prefervation  of  the  lands,  liber- 
ties, goods  and  lives  of  the  people,  from  one  who  by 
fraud  or  violence  m.akes  himfelf  mafter  of  all,  that 
he  may  be  reftrain'd  by  no  lav^',  and  is  what  he  is  by 
fubverting  all  law. 

BefideSj, 


Sea.  1 6.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      127 

BefideSj  if  the  fafety  of  the  people  be  the  fupreme 
law,  and  this  fafety  extend   to,   and  conlift  in  the 
prefervation  of  their  Hberties,  goods,  lands  and  lives, 
that  law  muft  neceffarily  be  the  root  and  beginning, 
as  well  as  the  end  and  limit  of  all  magiflratical  power, 
and  all  laws  muft  be  fubfervient  and  fubordinate  to  it. 
The  queftion  will  not  then  be  what  pleafes  the  king, 
but  what  is  good  for  the  people;  not  what  conduces 
to  his  profit  or  glory,  but  v/hat  beft  fecures  tiie 
liberties  he  is  bound  to  preferve :  he  does  not  there- 
fore reign  for  himfeif,  but  for  the  people,  he  is  not 
tlie  mafter,   but  the  fervant  of  the  commonwealth ; 
and  the  utmoft  extent  of  his  prerogative  is  to  be  able 
to  do  more  good  than  any  private  man.     If  this  be 
his  work  and  duty,  'tis  eafily  {cen  whether  he  is  to 
judge  of  his  own  performance,  or  they  by  whom 
and  for  whom  he  reigns  5  and  whether  in  order  to 
this  he  be  to  give  laws,  or  to  receive  them.     'Tis 
ordinarily  faid  in  France,  *'  II  faut  que  chacun  foit 
"  fervi  a  fa  mode ;"  every  man's  bufinefs  muft  be 
done  according  to  his  own  mind :  and  if  this  be  true 
in  particular  perfons,  'tis  more  plainly  fo  in  whole 
nations.     Many  eyes  fee  more  than  one  :  the  col- 
lecSed  wifdom  of  a  people  much  furpaftes  that  of  a 
iingle  perfon ,  and  tho'  he  fhould  truly  feek  that 
which  is  beft,  'tis   not  probable  he  would  fo  eafily 
find  it,  as  the  body  of  a  nation,  or  the  principal  men 
chofen  to  reprefent  the  v/hole.     This  may   be  faid 
with  juftice  of  the  beft  and  wifeft  princes  that  ever 
were  :  but  another  Ian2:ua2:e  is  to  be  ufed  when  we 

'  DO 

fpeak  of  thofe  who  may  fucceed^,  and  who  very  often 
through  the  defecfts  of  age,  perfon,  or  fex,  are 
neither  fit  to  judge  of  other  mens  afi^airSj  nor  of 
their  own  ;  and  are  fo  far  from  being  capable  of  the 
higheft  concernments  relating  to  the  lafety  of  whole 

2  nations. 


128  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

nations,  that  the  moft  trivial  cannot  reafonably  be 
referred  to  them. 

There  are  few  men  (except  fuch  as  are  hke  Fil-  i 
mer,  who  by  bidding  defiance  to  the  laws  of  God 
and  man,  feemsto  declare  war  againft  both)  whom 
I  would  not  truft  to  determine  whether  a  people, 
that  can  never  fall  into  nonage  or  dotage,  and  can 
never  fail  of  having  men  of  wifdom  and  virtue 
amongft  them,  be  not  more  fit  to  judge  in  their 
own  perfons,  or  by  reprefentatives,  what  conduces 
to  their  own  good,  than  one  who  at  a  venture  may 
be  born  in  a  certain  family,  and  who,  befides  his 
own  infirmities,  paffions,  vices,  or  interefts,  is  con- 
tinually furrounded  by  fuch  as  endeavour  to  divert 
him  from  the  ways  of  truth  and  juftice.  And  if  no 
reafonable  man  dare  prefer  the  latter  before  the  for-  " 
mer,  we  muft  rely  upon  the  laws  made  by  our  fore- 
fathers, and  interpreted  by  the  nation,  and  not  upon 
the  will  of  a  man. 

'Tis  in  vain  to  fay  that  a  wife  and  good  council 
may  fupply  the  defeats,  or  corred:  the  vices  of  a 
young,  foolifli,  or  ill  difpofed  king.  For  Filmer 
denies  that  a  king,  whatever  he  be  without  excep- 
tion,^ (for  he  attributes  profound  wifdom  to  all) 
is  obliged  to  follow  the  advice  of  his  council ;  and 
even  he  would  hardly  have  had  the  impudence 
to  fay,  that  good  council  given  to  a  foolifh  or  wick- 
ed prince  were  of  any  value,  unlefs  he  Vv^ere  oblig- 
ed to  follow  it.  This  council  muft  be  chofen  by 
him,  or  impofed  upon  him :  if  it  be  impofed  upon 
him,  it  muft  be  by  a  power  that  is  above  him, 
which  he  fays  cannot  be.  If  chofen  by  him  who 
is  weak,  foolifti,  or  wicked,  it  can  never  be  good  j  I 
becaufe  fuch  virtue  and  wifdom  is  required  to  dif-  ■ 
cern  and  choofe  a  fev/  good  and  wife  men,  from  a 
multitude  of  foolifti  and  bad,  as  he  has  not.     And 

It 


Se6l.  1 6.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      12 

it  will  generally  fall  out,  that  he  will  take  for  his 
counfellors  rather  thofe  he  believes  to  be  addide^  to 
his  perfon  or  interefts,  than  fuch  as  are  fitly  qualifi- 
ed to  perform  the  duty  of  their  places.  But  if  he 
fliould  by  chance,  or  contrary  to  his  intentions, 
make  choice  of  fome  good  and  wife  men,  the  mat- 
ter would  not  be  much  mended,  for  they  v/ill  cer- 
tainly differ  in  opinion  from  the  worft.  And  tho* 
the  prince  flioulcl  intend  well,  of  which  there  is  no 
alTurance ;  nor  any  reafon  to  put  fo  great  a  power 
into  his  hands  if  there  be  none,  'tis  almoll  impofli- 
ble  for  him  to  avoid  the  fnares  that  will  be  laid  to 
feduce  him.  I  know  not  how  to  put  a  better  face 
upon  this  matter ;  for  if  I  examine  rather  what  is 
probable  than  poilible,  foolifli  or  ill  princes  w^ill 
never  chufe  fuch  as  are  wife  and  good  -,  but  favour- 
ing thofe  who  are  mod  like  to  themfelves,  will  prefer 
fuch  as  fecond  their  vices,  humours,  and  perfonal 
interefts,  and  by  fo  doing  will  rather  fortify  and 
rivet  the  evils  that  are  brought  upon  the  nation 
through  their  defedls,  than  cure  them.  This  was 
i  evident  in  Rehoboam :  he  had  good  counfel,  but 
he  w^ould  not  hearken  to  it.  We  know  too  many 
of  the  fame  fort ;  and  tho'  it  were  not  im.pofiible  (as 
Macchiavelli  fays  it  is)  for  a  weak  prince  to  receive 
any  benefit  from  a  good  council,  we  m.ay  certainly 
conclude,  that  a  people  can  never  expect  any  good 
from  a  council  chofen  by  one  w^ho  is  wxalv  or 
vicious. 

If  a  council  be  impofed  upon  him,  and  he  be 
obliged  to  follow  their  advice,  it  mufl  be  impofed 
by  a  power  that  is  above  him  ;  his  will  therefore  is 
not  a  law,  but  muft  be  regulated  by  the  law  :  the 
monarchy  is  not  above  the  iaw;  and  if  we  will  be- 
lieve our  author,  'tis  no  monarchy,  becaufe  the  mo- 
narch has  not  bis  will,  and  perhaps  he  fays  true. 
Vol.  II.  K  For 


I3Q  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IK. 

For  if  that  be  not  an  Ariflocracy,  where  thofe  that 
are,  or  are  reputed  to  be  the  beft  do  govern,  then 
that  is  certainly  a  mixed  jflate,  in  which  the  will  of 
one  man  does  not  prevail.  But  if  princes  are  not 
obliged  by  the  law,  all  that  is  founded  upon  that 
fuppofition  falls  to  the  ground :  they  will  always 
follow  their  own  humours,  or  the  fuggeftions  of 
thofe  who  fecond  them.  Tiberius  hearkned  to  none 
but  Chaldeans,  or  the  minifters  of  his  impurities 
and  cruelties :  Claudius  was  governed  by  Haves, 
and  the  profligate  ftrumpets  his  wives.  There 
were  many  wife  and  good  men  in  the  fenate  during 
the  reigns  of  Caligula,  Nero  and  Domitian  -,  but 
inftead  of  following  their  counfel,  they  endeavour'd 
to  deftroy  them  all,  left  they  iliould  head  the  people 
againft  them  ;  and  fuch  princes  as  refemble  them 
will  always  follow  the  like  courfes. 

If  I  often  repeat  thefe  hateful  names,  'tis  not  for 
w^ant  of  frefher  examples  of  the  fame  nature  -,  but 
Ichoofe  fuch  as  mankind  has  univerfally  condemn'd, 
againft  whom  I  have  no  other  caufe  of  hatred  than 
what  is  common  to  all  thofe  who  have  any  love  to 
virtue,  and  which  can  have  no  other  relation  to  the 
controverfies  of  later  ages,  than  what  may  flow 
from  the  fimilitude  of  their  caufes,  rather  than  fuch 
as  are  too  well  known  to  us,  and  which  every  man, 
according  to  the  meafure  of  his  experience,  may 
call  to  mind  in  reading  thefe.  I  may  aUb  add,  that 
as  nothing  is  to  be  received  as  a  general  maxim, 
which  is  not  generally  true,  I  need  no  more  to  over- 
throw fuch  as  Filmer  propofes,  than  to  prove  how 
frequently  they  have  been  found  falfe,  and  what 
defperate  mifchiefs  have  been  brought  upon  t!ie 
world  as  often  as  they  have  been  pradtifed,  and  ex- 
ceflive  powers  put  into  the  hands  of  fuch  as  had 

neither 


Sea.  i6.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.  131 
neither  inclination  nor  ability  to  make  a  good  ufe 
of  them. 

1.  But  if  the  fafety  of  nations  be  the  end  for 
which  governments  are  inftitutcd,  fuch  as  take  upon 
them  to  govern,  by  what  title  foever,  are  by  the 
law  of  nature  bound  to  procure  it ;  and  in  order  to 
this,  to  preferve  the  lives,  lands,  liberties  and  goods 
of  every  one  of  their  fubjedts  :  and  he  that  upon 
any  title  whatfoever  pretends,  affumes,  or  exer- 
cifes  a  power  of  difpofing  of  them  according  to 
his  will,  violates  the  laws  of  nature  in  the  highefl 
degree. 

2.  If  all  princes  are  obliged  by  the  law  of  nature 
to  preferve  the  lands,  goods,  lives  and  liberties  of 
their  fubjc6ts,  thofe  fubjedts  have  by  the  law  of  na- 
ture a  right  to  their  liberties,  lands,  goods,  &c.  and 
cannot  depend  upon  the  will  of  any  man,  for  that 
dependance  deftroys  liberty,  &c. 

3 .  Ill  men  will  not,  and  weak  men  cannot  pro- 
vide for  the  fafety  of  the  people ;  nay  the  work  is 
of  fuch  extreme  difficulty,  that  the  greateft  and 
wifeft  men  that  have  been  in  the  world  are  not  able 
by  themfelves  to  perform  it ;  and  the  affiftance  of 
counfel  is  of  no  ufe  unlefs  princes  are  obliged  to  fol- 
low it.  There  muft  be  therefore  a  power  in  every 
flate  to  reftrain  the  ill,  and  to  inflruct  weak  princes 
by  obliging  them  to  follow  the  counfels  given,  elfe 
the  ends  of  government  cannot  be  accompiiflied,  nor 
the  rights  of  a  nation  preferved. 

All  this  being  no  more  than  is  faid  by  our  author, 
or  neceffarily  to  be  deduced  from  his  propofitions, 
one  would  think  he  were  become  as  good  a  com- 
monwealth's- man  as  Cato ;  but  the  waflied  Avine 
will  return  to  the  m.ire.  He  overthrows  all  by  a 
prepofterous  conjunction  of  the  rights  of  kings  which 
are  juft  and  by  law,  v/ith  thofe  of  tyrants  which  are 

K  z  utterly 


cc 


,32  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

Utterly  againft  law  ;  and  gives  the  facred  and  gentle 
"ame  of  father  to  thofe  beafls,  who  by  their  actions 
declare  themfelves  enemies  not  only  to  all  law  and 
juftice,  but  to  mankind  that  cannot  fubfift  without 
them.  This  requires  no  other  proof,  than  to  exa- 
mine whether  Attila  or  Tamerlane  did  well  deferve 
to  be  called  fathers  of  the  countries  they  deftroy'd. 
The  firft  of  thefe  was  ufually  called  the  fcourge  of 
God,  and  he  gloried  in  the  name.  The  other  being 
reproved  for  the  deteftable  cruelties  he  exercifed, 
made  anfwer,  *^  *  You  fpeak  to  me  as  to  a  man  ^ 
I  am  not  a  man,  but  the  fcourge  of  God  and 
plague  of  mankind/'  This  is  certainly  fweet  and 
gentle  language,  favouring  much  of  a  fatherly  ten- 
dernefs :  there  is  no  doubt  that  thofe  who  ufe  it  will  -^ 
provide  for  the  fafety  of  the  nations  under  them,  and 
the  prefer vation  of  the  laws  of  nature  is  rightly  re- 
ferred to  them ',  and  'tis  very  probable,  that  they 
who  came  to  burn  the  countries,  and  deftrov  the 
nations  that  fell  under  their  power,  {hould  make  it 
their  bufinefs  to  preferve  them,  and  look  upon  the 
former  governors  "  as  their  fathers,  whofe  ads  they 
*'  v/ere  obliged  to  confirm,'*  tho'  they  feldom  at- 
tained to  the  dominion  by  any  other  means  than  the 
llaughter  of  them  and  their  families. 

But  If  the  enmity  be  not  againft  the  nation,  and 
the  caufe  of  the  war  be  only  for  dominion  againft 
the  ruling  perfon  or  fam.ily,  as  that  of  Baafha  againft 
the  houfe  of  Jeroboam,  of  Zimri  againft  that  of 
Baafha,  of  Omri  againft  Zimri,  .and  Jehu  againft 
Joram,  the  profecution  of  it  is  a  ftrange  way  of  be- 
coming the  ion  of  the  perfon  deftroyed.  And  Fil- 
mer  alone  is  fubtil  enough  to  difcover,  that  Jehu  by 
extinguiihing  the  houfe  of  Ahab,  drew  an  obliga- 
tion upon  himfelf,  of  looking  on  him  as  his  father, 

•*  Vlt.  Tamerl.  hifl.  Thiinn. 

4  and 


ill 
"I 


Scd.ie.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     1^3 

and  confirming  his  ads.  If  this  be  true,  Mofeswas 
obliged  to  confirm  the  ads  of  the  kings  of  the 
Amalekites,  Moabites  and  Amorites  that  he  de- 
ftroy'd  ;  the  fame  duty  lay  upon  Jofliua,  in  relation 
to  the  Canaanites :  but  'tis  not  fo  eafily  decided,  to 
which  of  them  he  did  owe  that  deference ;  for  the 
fame  could  not  be  due  to  all,  and  'tis  hard  to  believe, 
that  by  killing  above  thirty  kings,  he  fhould  purchafe 
to  himfelf  fo  many  fathers^  and  the  like  may  be  faid 
of  divers  others. 

Moreover,  there  is  a  fort  of  tyrant  who  has  no 
father,  as  Agathocles,  Dionyfius,  C^far,  and 
generally  all  thofe  who  fubvert  the  liberties  of  their 
*>own  country.  And  if  they  flood  obliged  to  look 
upon  the  former  magiftrates  as  their  predeceflbrs, 
and  to  confirm  their  ads,  the  firft  fliould  have  been 
•to  give  imipunity  and  reward  to  any  that  would 
kill  them,  it  having  been  a  fundamental  maxim  in 
thofe  ftates,  that  any  man  might  kill  a  tyrant  ^\ 

This  being  in  all  refpeds  ridiculous  and  abfurd, 
■'tis  evident  that  our  author,  who  by  propofing  fuch 
a  falfe  fecurity  to  nations  for  their  liberties,  endea- 
vours to  betray  them,  is  not  lefs  treacherous  to  kings, 
when  under  a  pretence  of  defending  their  rights, 
he  makes  them  to  be  the  fame  with  thofe  of  tyrants, 
who  are  known  to  have  none  (and  are  tyrants  becaufe 
they  have  none)  and  gives  no  othtr  hopes  to  nations 
of  being  preferved  by  the  kings  they  fet  up  for  that 

"jj  end,  than  what  upon  the  fame  account  may  be 
expeded  from  tyrants,  whom  all  wife  men  have  ever 
abhorr'd,  and  affirmed  to  have  been  "  produced  to 
"  bring  deftrudion  upon  the  world  'f"  and  whofe 

!    lives  have  verified  the  fentence. 

*  Uniculquelicere  tyrannum  occidere, 
f  In  generis  humani  e.\itium  natos. 

K  7  This 


134  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

This  is  truly  to  depofe  and  abolifli  kings,  by 
abolifhing  that  by  which  and  for  which  they  are  fo. 
The  greatnefs  of  their  power,  riches,  ftate,  and 
the  pleafures  that  accompany  them  cannot  but  create 
enemies.  Some  will  envy  that  which  is  accounted 
happinefs ;  others  may  difiike  the  ufe  they  make  of 
their  power :  fome  may  be  unjuilly  exafperated  by 
the  beft  of  their  actions- when  thev  find  themfelves 
incommoded  by  them ;  others  may  be  too  fevere 
judges  of  flight  mifcarriages.  Tbefe  things  may 
reafonably  temper  the  joys  of  thofe  who  delight 
moft  in  the  advantages  of  crowns.  But  the  worft 
and  moft  dangerous  of  all  their  enemies  are  thefe 
accurfed  fycophants,  who  by  making  thofe  that 
ought  to  be  the  beft  of  men,  like  to  the  worft, 
deftroy  their  being ;  and  by  perfuading  the  world  . 
they  aim  at  the  fame  things,  and  are  bound  to  no  j. 
other  rule  than  is  common  to  all  tyrants,  give  a  fair 
pretence  to  ill  men  to  fay,  they  are  all  of  one  kind,  ji 
And  if  this  fhould  be  received  for  truth,  even  they 
who  think  the  mifcarriages  of  their  governors  may 
be  eaiily  redreffed,  and  deiire  no  more,  would  be 
the  moft  fierce  in  procuring  the  deftrudion  of 
that  which  is  naught  in  principle,  and  cannot  be 
corrected. 

SECT.      XVIL 

Kings  cannot  he  the  interpreters  of  the  oaths  ihcj 

take. 

OUR  author's  book  is  fo  full  of  abfardities  and 
contradidions,  that  it  would  be  a  rope  of 
fand,  if  a  continued  feries  of  frauds  did  not,  like  a 
ftring  of  poifons  running  through  the  whole,  give  it 
fome  confiftence  with  it  felf,  and  fhew  it  to  be  the 
w^ork  of  one  and  the  fame  hand.  After  having 
3  endeavoured 


Sea.  17.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      135 

endeavoured  to  fubvert  the  laws  of  God,  nature> 
and  nations,  mofl  efpecially  our  own,  by  abufing  the 
fcriptures,  falfly  alledging  the  authority  of  many  good 
writers,  and  feeking  to  obtrude  upon  mankind  an 
univerfal  law,  that  would  take  from  every  nation  the 
right  of  conftituting  fuch  governments  within  them- 
felves  as  feem  moft  convenient  for  them,  and  giving 
rules  for  the  adminlftration  of  fuch  as  they  had 
eftabli filed,  he  gives  us  a  full  view  of  his  religion 
and  morals,  by  deftroying  the  force  of  the  oath 
taken  by  our  kings  at  their  coronation.  "  Others,** 
fays  he,  *^  affirm  that  although  laws  of  themfelves 
do  not  bind  kings,  yet  the  oaths  of  kings  at  their 
coronation  tie  them  to  keep  all  the  laws  of  their 
*'  kingdoms.  How  far  this  is  true,  let  us  but  ex- 
'^  amine  the  oath  of  the  kings  of  England  at  their 
"  coronation,  the  words  whereof  are  thefe.  Art 
thou  pleafed  to  caufe  to  be  adminiftred  in  all  thy 
judgments,  indifferent  and  upright  juftice,  and  to 
ufe  difcretion  with  mercy  and  verity  ?  Art  thou 
pleafed  that  our  upright  laws  and  cuftoms  be  ob- 
served, and  doff  thou  promife  that  thofe  fliall  be 
protected  and  maintained  by  thee  ?  &c."  To 
which  the  king  "  anfwers  in  the  affirmative,  being 
firfl:  demanded  by  the  archbifhop  of  Canterbury, 
plcafeth  it  you  to  confirm  and  obferve  the  laws 
and  cuftoms  of  the  antient  times,  granted  from 
God  by  juft  and  devout  kings  unto  the  Englifh 
nation,  by  oath  unto  the  faid  people,  efpecially 
'^  the  laws,  liberties  and  cuftoms  granted  unto  the 
"  clergy  and  laity  by  the  famous  king  Edward  ?" 
From  this  he  infers,  that  the  king  "  is  not  to  ob- 
"  ferve  all  laws,  but  fuch  as  are  upright,  becaufe 
**  he  finds  evil  lav/s  mentioned  in  the  oath  of 
*'  Richard  the  li.  which  he  fwears  to  abolifti:  Now 
"  what  laws  are  upright  and  what  evil,  who  fliail 

K  4         ^  ''  judge 


C( 
(C 
(C 

cc 

(C 

<c 


cc 
cc 

<c 
<c 
cc 


(C 

€C 

<c 

cc 
cc 
cc 


136  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IH 

**  judge  but  the  king  ?  &c.     So  that  in  efifed:  the 
*f  king  doth  fwear  to  keep  no  laws  but  fuch  as  in  his 
*'  judgment  are  upright,  &c.     And  if  he  did  jftridlly 
*'  fwear  to  obferve  all  laA^s,  he  could  not  without 
*'  perjury  give  his  confent  to  the  repealing  or  abro- 
"  gating  of  any  ftatute  by  a6l  of  parliament,  &c." 
And  again,  ''  But  let  it  be  fuppofed  for  truth,  that 
kings  do  fwear  to  obferve  all  laws  of  their  king- 
doms ;  yet  no  man  can  think  it  reafon,  that  the 
kings  fiiould  be  more  bound  by  their  voluntary 
oaths  than  common  perfons :  now  if  a  private 
perfon  make  a  contract,  either  with  oath  or  with- 
out oath,  he  is  no  farther  bound  than  the  equity 
*^  and  juflice  of  the  contra6l  ties  him  ;  for  a  man 
"  may  have  relief  againfl  an  unreafonable  and  unjuft 
"  promife,  if  either  deceit  or  error,  force  or  fear 
*^  induced  him   thereunto  :  or  if  it  be  hurtful  or 
^^  grievous  in   the  performance,  iince   the  law  in 
**  many  cafes   gives  the  king  a  prerogative   above 
*-  common  perfons."     Led  I  fliould  be  thought 
to  infid  upon  fmiall  advantages,  I  will  not  oblige  any 
man  to  (Ivtw  w^here  Filmer  found  this  oath,  nor 
obferve  the  faults  com^mitted  in  the  tranflation  ;  but 
notwithfranding  his  falfereprefentation,  I  find  enough 
for  my  purpofe,  and  intend   to  take  it  in  his  own 
words.     Bat  firil  I  fhall  take  leave  to  remark,  that 
thofe  who  for  private  interefts  addid:  them.felves  to 
the  perfonal  fervice    of  princes,  tho'  to  the  ruin  of 
their  country,  find  it  impofiible  to  perfuade  man- 
•  kind  that  kings  may  govern  as  they  pleafe,  when 
all   men  know  there  are  laws  to  dire(5l  and  reftrain 
them,  unlefs  they  can  make  men  believe  they  have 
their  powxr  from  an  univerfal  and  fuperior  law  ;  or 
.that  princes  can  attempt  to  diifolve  the  obligations 
laid  upon  them  by  the  laws,  which  they  fo  folemnly ' 

fwear 


Sea.  1 7-   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      137 

fwear  to  obferve,  without  rendring  themfelves  de- 
teftable  to  God  and  man,  and  fubjed:  to  the  reveng- 
ing hands  of  both,  unlefs  they  can  invaUdate  thole 
oaths.     Mr.  Hobbes  ^'  I  think  was  the  firft,    who 
very  Ingenioufly  contrived  a  compendious  way  of 
juftifying  the  moil  abominable  perjuries,  and  all  the 
mifchiefs  enfuing  thereupon,  by  pretending,  that  as 
the  king's  oath  is  made  to  the  people,  the  people  may 
abfolve   him   from  the    obligation ;    and  that  the 
people  having  conferred  upon  him  all  the  power 
they  had,  he  can  do  all  that  they  could :  he  can 
therefore  abfolve  himfelf,  and  is  adually  free,  fince 
he  is  fo  when  he  pleafes.     This  is  only  falfe  in  the 
minor:  for  the  people  not  having  conferred  upon 
him  all,  but  only  a  part  of  their  power,    that  of 
abfolving  him  remains  in  themfelves,  otherwife  they 
would  never  have  obliged  him  to  take  the  oath.     He 
cannot  therefore  abfolve  himfelf.     The  pope  finds  a 
help  for  this,    and  as  Chrlft^s  vicar  pretends  the 
power  of  abfolution  to  be  in  him,  and  exercifed  it 
in  abfolving  king  John.     But  our  author  defpairing 
to  impofe  either  of  thefe  upon  our  age  and  nation, 
with  more  impudence  and  lefs  wit,  would  enervate 
all  coronation- oaths  by  fubje<fl:ing  them  to  the  dif- 
cretion  of  the  taker ;  whereas  all  m.en  have  hitherto 
thought  their  force  to  confift  in  the  declared  fenfe  of 
thofe  who  give  them.     This  dodlrine  is  fo  new,  that 
it  furpaffes  the  fubtilty  of  the  fchoolmen,  v/ho,  as 
an  ingenious  perfon  faid  of  them,  had  minced  oaths 
fo  fine,  that  a  million  of  them,  as  well  as  angels, 
may  iland  upon  the  point  of  a  needle  5  and  were 
never  yet  equalled  but  by  the  Jefuits,  who    have 
overthrown  them  by  mental  refervations,  which  is  fo 
clearly  demonftrated  from  their  books,  that  it  cannot 
be  denied,  but  fo  horrible^  that  even  thofe  of  their 

*  Lib.  de  Give. 

own 


13S  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

own  order  who  have  the  Icafl:  fpark  of  common 
honefty  condemn  the  practice.  And  one  of  them, 
being  a  gentleman  of  a  good  family,  told  me,  he 
would  go  the  next  day  and  take  all  the  oaths  that 
fliould  be  ofFer'd,  if  he  could  fatisfy  his  confcience 
in  ufing  any  manner  of  equivocation  or  mental  refer- 
vation ;  or  that  he  might  put  any  other  fenfe  upon 
them,  than  he  knew  to  be  intended  by  thofe  who 
offered  them.  And  if  our  author's  confcience  were 
not  more  corrupted  than  that  of  the  Jefuit,  who  had 
lived  fifty  years  under  the  v/orft  difcipline  that  I  think 
ever  was  in  the  world,  I  would  afxC  him  ferioufly, 
if  he  truly  believe,  that  the  nobility,  clergy  and 
commonalty  of  England,  who  have  been  always  fo 
zealous  for  their  antient  laws,  and  fo  refolute  in  de- 
fending them,  did  mean  no  more  by  the  oaths  they 
fo  folemnly  impofed,  and  upon  which  they  laid  fo 
much  weight,  than  that  the  king  ihould  fwear  to 
keep  tliem,  fo  far  only  as  he  fliould  think  fit.  But 
*'  he  fwears  only  to  obferve  thofe  that  are  upright,  &c." 
How  can  that  be  underftood  otherwife,  than  that 
thofe  who  give  the  oath,  do  declare  their  laws  and 
cuftoms  to  be  upright  and  good,  and  he  by  taking 
the  oath  afiirms  them  to  be  fo  ?  Or  how  can  they  be 
more  precifely  fpecified  than  by  the  enfuing  claufe, 
Granted  from  God  by  juft  and  devout  kings  by 
oath,  efpecially  thofe  of  the  famous  king  Edward?" 
But,  fays  he,  by  the  fame  oath  .Richard  the  IT. 
*^  was  bound  to  abolifli  thofe  that  were  evil."  If 
any  fuch  had  crept  in  through  error,  or  been  ob- 
truded by  malice,  the  evil  being  difcovered  and 
declared  by  the  nobility  and  commons  Vv^ho  were 
concerned,  he  was  not  to  take  advantage  of  them, 
or  by  his  refufal  to  evade  the  abolition,  but  to  join 
with  his  people  in  annulling  them,  according  to 

the 


Sea.  17.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     139 

the  general  claufe  of  affentingto  thofe ''  Quasvulgus 
'*  elegerit." 

Magna  Charta  being  only  an  abridgment  of  our 
antlent  laws  and  cuftomSj  the  king  that  fwears  to  it, 
fwears  to  them  all  j  and  not  being  admitted  to  be 
the  interpreter  of  it,  or  to  determine  what  is  good 
or  evil,  fit  to  be  obferved  or  annulled  in  it,  can  have 
po  more  power  over  the  reft.     This  having  been 
confirmed  by  more  parliaments  than  we  have  had 
kings  fince  that  time,  the  fame  obligation  muft  ftill 
lie  upon  them  all,  as  upon  John  and  Henry,    in 
'whofe  time  that  claim  of  right  was  compiled.  The 
ad:  was  no  lefs  folemn  than  important ;  and  the  moft 
dreadful  curfes  that  could  be  conceived  in  words, 
which  were  denounced  againft  fuch  as  fliould  any 
way  infringe  it,  by  the  clergy  in  Weftminfter-hall, 
in   the  prefence  and  v/ith  the  affent  of  King  Henry 
.III.  many  of  the  principal  nobility,  and  all  the  eftates 
of    the  kingdom,    fliew  whether  it  was  referred 
to  the  king's  judgment  or  not ;  when  'tis   evident 
they  feared  the  violation  from  no  other  than  him- 
felf,  and  fuch  as  he  -fhould  employ.     I  confefs  the 
church  (as  they  then  called  the  clergy)  was  fallen 
into  fuch  corruption,  that  their  arms  were  not  much 
to  be  feared  by  one  who  had  his  confcience  clear; 
but  that  could  not  be  in  the  cafe  of  perjury:  and 
our  anceftors  could  do  no  better,  than  to  employ 
the  fpiritual  fword,  referving  to  themfelves  the  ufe 
of  the  other  in  cafe  that  he  (hould  be  defpifed.  Tho* 
.  the  pope's  excommunications  proved  fometimes  to 
be  but  bruta  fulmina,  when  a  juft  caufe  was  want- 
ing, it  may  be  eafily  judged  what  a  prince  could  ex- 
pe6l  from  his  fabjeds,  when  every  man  knew  he 
had  by  perjury  drawn  the  moft  heavy  curfes  upon 
himfelf.     King  John  was  certainly  wicked,  but  he 
durft  not  break  thefe  bonds  till  he  had  procured  the 

pope's 


1  . 


cc 
cc 


14a  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill, 

pope's  abfolutlon  for  a  cover  -,  and  when  he  had 
done  fo,  he  found  himfelf  unfafe  under  it,  and  could 
Rot  make  good  what  he  had  promifed  to  the  pope 
to  obtain  it,  the  parliament  declaring  that  his  grants 
to  the  pope  were  uniuil:,  illegal,  contrary  to  his  co- 
ronation-oath, and  that  they  would  not  be  held  by 
them.  This  went  fo  far  in  that  king's  time,  that 
writs  were  iiTued  out  to  men  of  all  conditions  to 
oblige  themfelves  by  oath  to  keep  the  great  charter ; 
and  if  other  means  failed,  *'  *  to  compel  the  king 
*^  to  perform  the  conditions."  'Tis  exprefly  fald  in 
his  charter,  ''  -f-  That  the  barons  and  commonalty 
of  the  land  fliall  ftreighten  and  compel  lis  by  all 
means  poffible,  as  by  feizing  our  towns,  lands, 
and  pofTefiions,  or  any  other  way,  till  fatisfac- 
tion  be  made  according  to  their  pleafure."  And 
in  the  charter  of  his  fon  Henry,  'tis,  upon  the  fame 
fuppofition  of  not  performing  the  agreement,  faid, 
;};  It  ihall  be  lawful  for  all  men  in  our  kingdom 
to  rife  up  againfl  us,  and  to  do  all  things  that 
may  be  grievous  to  us,  as  if  they  were  abfolutely 
^^  free  from  any  engagements  to  our  perfon."  Thefe 
words  feem  to  have  been  contrived  to  be  fo  full  and 
flrong  propter  duplicitatem  regis,  which  was  with 
too  much  reafon  fufpecfled.  And  'tis  not,  as  I  fup- 
pofe,  the  language  of  flaves  and  villains  begging 
fomething  from  their  lord,  but  of  noble  and  free 
men,  who  knew  their  lord  was  no  more  than  what 
they  made  him,    and  had  nothing  but  what  they 

*  Et  quod  ipfum  regem  per  captionem  diftringerent  &  gravarent  ad 
prasfata  exequenda. 

f  Et  ipii  Barones  cum  cominunitate  totius  terrre  diilringent  &  gra- 
vabunt  nos  modls  omnibus  quibus  poterunt,  fcilicet  per  captionem 
caftrorum,  terrarum,  polTeffonum,  &  aliis  modis  quibus  potucrint,  do- 
me eniendatuin  fuerit  fecundum  arbitrium  eorum. 

X  Licet  omnibus  de  regno  noflro  contra  nos  infurgere,  Sz  omnia  fa- 
cere  qu£  gravamen  noftrum  refpiciant,  ac  fi  nobis  m  nullo  teneren- 
tar. 


cc 


gave 


Sed.  17.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     142 

gave  him  :  nor  the  language  of  a  lord  treating  with 
fuch  as  enjoy'd  their  liberties  by  his  favour,  but  with 
thofe  whom  he  acknowledged  to  be  the  judges  of 
his  performing  what  had  been  ftipulated  -,  and  equals 
the  agreements  made  between  the  kings  and  people 
of  Arragon,  which  I  cited  before  from  the  relations 
of  Antonio  Perez.  This  is  as  far  as  men  can  go  ^ 
and  the  experience  of  all  ages  manifefts,  that  princes 
performing  their  office,  and  obferving  thefe  ftipu- 
lations,  have  lived  glorious,  happy  and  beloved  : 
and  I  can  hardly  find  an  example  of  any  who  have 
notorioufly  broken  thefe  oaths,  and  been  adjudged 
to  have  incurred  the  penalties,  who  have  not  lived 
miferably,  died  (hamefully,  and  left  an  abominable 
memory  to  poflerity. 

"  But,  fays  our  author,  kings  cannot  be  more 
''  obliged  by  voluntary  oaths  than  other  men,  and 
'^  may  be  relieved  from  unjuft  and  unreafonable 
*'  promifes,  if  they  be  induced  by  deceit,  error, 
*'  force  or  fear,  or  the  performance  be  grievous." 
Which  is  to  fay,  that  no  oath  is  of  any  obligation  : 
for  there  is  none  that  is  not  voluntary  or  involuntary, 
and  there  never  was  any  upon  which  fome  fuch 
thing  may  not  be  pretended,  which  would  be  the 
fame  if  fuch  as  Filmer  had  the  diredion  of  their 
confciences  who  take  the  oaths,  and  of  thofe  vv'ho 
are  to  txzCi  the  performance.  This  would  foon  de- 
flroy  all  confidence  between  king  and  people,  and. 
not  only  unhinge  the  beft  eftabliihed  governments, 
but  by  a  deteftable  practice  of  annihilating  the  force 
of  oaths  and  moft  folemn  contradls  that  can  be  made 
by  men,  overthrow  all  focietics  that  fubfilc  by  them. 
I  leave  it  to  all  leafonable  men  to  judge  how  fit  a 
work  this  would  be  for  the  fupreme  n^iagiilrate  v/bo 
is  advanced  to  the  higheft  degree  of  human  glory 
and  happinefs,  that  he  m.ay  preierve  them ;  and  how 

that 


142  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

that  juftice,  for  the  obtaining  of  which  govern- 
ments are  conftituted,  can  be  adminiftred,  if  he  who 
is  to  exaft  it  from  others,  do  in  his  own  perfon  ut- 
terly fubvert  it ;  and  what  they    deferve,  who  by 
fuch  bafe  prevarications  would  teach  them  to  pervert 
and   abolifh  the  moft  facred  of  all  contrads.     A 
worthy  perfon  of  our  age  was  accuflomed  to  fay 
that  contra6ts  in  writing  v\  ere  invented  only  to  bind 
villains,  who  having  no  law,  jufticeor  truth  within 
themfelves,  would  not  keep  their  words,  unlefs  fuch 
teftimonies  were  given  as  might  compel  them.  But 
if  our  author's  dodlrine  were  received,  no  contract 
would  be  of  more  value  than  a  cobweb.     Such  as 
are  not  abfolutely  of  a  profligate  confcience,  fo  far 
reverence  the  religion  of  an  oath,  to  think  that  even 
thofe  which  are  moft  unjuftly  and  violently  impofed 
ought  to  be  obferved  -,  and  Julius  Caefar,  who   I 
think  was  not  over-fcrupulous,  when  he  was  taken 
by  pirates,  and  fet  at  liberty  upon  his  word,  caufed 
the  ranfom  he  had  promifed  to  be  paid  to  them. 
We  fee  the  like  is  pradifed  every  day  by  prifoners 
taken  in  unjuft  as  well  as  juft  wars  :  and  there  is  no 
honeft  man  that  would   not  abhor  a  perfon,  who 
being  taken  by  the  pirates  of  Algier  fliould  not  pay 
what  he  had  promifed   for  his  liberty.     'Twere  in 
vain  to  fay   they  had  no  right  of  exading,    or  that 
the  performance   was   grievous ;    he  muft    return 
to  chains,  or  pay.     And  tho'  the  people  of  Artois, 
Alfatia,    or    Flanders,    do    perhaps     with    reafon 
think  the  king  of  France  has    no  right  to    im- 
pofe  oaths  of  allegiance  upon  them,  no  man  doubts, 
that  if  they  choofe  rather  to  take  thofe  oaths,  than 
to  fuffer  what  might  enfue  upon  their  refulal,  they 
are  as  much  bound  to  be  faithful  to  him  as  his  an- 
tient  fubieds. 

The 


Sea.  17.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      143 

The  like  may   be  faid  of  promifes  extorted  by 
fraud  ;  and  no  other  example  is  neceffiiry  to  prove 
they  are  to  be  performed  than  that  of  Jofhua  made 
to  the  Gibeonites.     They  were  an  accurfed  nation, 
which  he  was  com.manded  to  deftroy  :  they  came 
to  him   with  lies,  and  by   deceit  induced  him   to 
make  a  league  with  them,  which  he  ought  not  to 
have  done;  but  being  made,  it  was  to  be  performed  ; 
and  on  that  account  he  did  not  only  fpare  but  defend 
them,  and  the  adion  was  approved  by  God.     When 
Saul  by  a  prepoflerous  zeal  violated  that  league,  the 
anger  of  God  for  that  breach   of  faith  could  no 
otherwife  be  appeafed  than  by  the  death  of  feven  of 
his  children.     This  cafe  is  fo  full,  foprecife,  and  of 
fuch  undoubted  authority,  that  I  fliall  not  trouble 
myfclf  with  any  other.     But  if  we  believe  our  man 
of  good  morals,  voluntary  oaths  and  promifes  are 
of  no  more  value  than  thofe  gained  by  force  or  de- 
ceit, that  is  to  fay,  none  are  of  any.     For  volunta- 
ry fignifying  nothing  but  free,  all  human  afts  are 
either  free  or  not  free,  that  is,  from  the  will  of  the 
perfon,  or  fome  impulfe  from  without.     If  there- 
fore there  be  no  force  in  thofe  that  are  free,  nor  in 
thofe  that  are  not  free,  there  is  none  in  any. 

No  better  ufe  can  be  made  of  any  "  pretenlion  of 
*'  error,"  or  that  the''  performance  was  grievous )" 
for  no  man  ought  to  be  grieved  at  the  performance 
of  his  contrad.  David  affures  us,  that  a  good  man 
performs  his  agreement  tho'  he  lofe  by  it ;  and  the 
lord  chancellor  Egerton  told  a  gentleman,  who  defired 
relief  againft  his  own  deed,  upon  an  allegation  that  he 
knew  not  what  he  did  when  he  figned  it,  that  he  did 
not  fit  to  relieve  fools. 

But  tho'  voluntary  promifes  or  oaths,  when,  to 
ufe  the  lawyers  language,  there  is  not  a  valuable 
coufidcration,  were  of  no  obligation  -,  or  that  men 

brought 


144  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

brought  by  force,  fear  or  error,  Into  fuch  contracls 
as  are  grievous  in  the  performance,  might  be  re- 
lieved; this  v^^ould  not  at  all  reach  the  cafes  of 
princes,  in  the  contrails  made  between  them  and 
their  fubjeds,  and  confirmed  by  their  oaths,  there 
being:  i^o  colour  of  force  or  fraud,  fear  or  error  for 
them  to  alledge  ;  nor  any  thing  to  be  pretended  that 
can  be  grievous  to  perform,  other  wife  than  as  it  may 
be  grievous  to  an  ill  man  not  to  do  the  mifchiefs  he 
had  conceived. 

Nations  according  to  their  own  will  frame  the 
laws  by  which  they  refolve  to  be  governed  ;  and  if 
they  do  it  not  wifely,  the  damage  is  only  to  them- 
felves ;  but  'tis  hard  to  find  an  example  of  any  peo- 
ple that  did  by  force  oblige  a  man  to  take  upon  him 
the  government  of  them.  Gideon  was  indeed  much 
prefkd  by  the  Ifraelites  to  be  their  king ;  and  the 
army  of  Germanicus  in  a  mutiny  more  fiercely 
urged  him  to  be  emperor ;  but  both  defifted  when 
their  offers  were  refufed.  If  our  kings  have  been 
more  modeft,  and  our  anceftors  more  pertinacious  in 
compelling  them  to  accept  the  crowns  they  offer 'd, 
I  {hall  upon  proof  of  the  matter  change  my  opinion. 
But  till  that  do  appear,  I  may  be  pardoned  if  I 
think  there  was  no  fuch  thing.  William,  the  Nor- 
man was  not  by  force  brought  into  England,  but 
came  voluntarily,  and  defired  to  be  king:  the  nobility, 
clergy,  and  commons  propofcd  the  conditions  up- 
on which  they  would  receive  him.  Thefe  conditions 
were  to  govern  according  to  their  antient  laws, 
efpecially  thofe  that  had  been  granted,  or  rather 
collected  in  the  time  of  the  famous  king  Edward. 
Here  Vv^as  neither  force  nor  fraud ;  if  he  had  difliked 
the  terms,  he  might  have  retired  as  freely  as  he  came. 
But  he  did  like  them  \  and  tho'  he  was  not  perhaps 

fo 


Sea.  17.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     145 

fo  modeft,  to  fay  with  the  brave  Saxon  king  Offa, 
"  Ad  Hbertatis  veftr^e  tuitionem,  non  meis  mentis, 
*^  fed  fola  liberahtate  veflra  unanimiter  me  convo- 
"  caflis*,"  he  accepted  the  crown  upon  the  conditi- 
ons oiFer'd,  and  fwore  upon  theevangeHfls  toobferve 
them.  Not  much  valuing  this,  he  pretended  to 
govern  according  to  his  own  will;  but  finding  the 
people  would  not  endure  it,  he  renewed  his  oath 
upon  the  fame  evangeliils,  and  the  reliqucs  of  S. 
Alban,  which  he  needed  not  to  have  done,  but 
might  have  departed  to  his  dutchy  of  Normandy  if 
he  had  not  lik'd  the  conditions,  or  thought  not  fit  to 
obferve  them.  'Tis  probable  he  examined  the  con- 
tents of  Edward's  laws  before  he  -j-  fwore  to  them, 
and  could  not  imagine,  that  a  free  nation  which 
never  had  any  other  kings  than  fuch  as  had  been 
chofen  by  themfelves  for  the  prefervation  of  their 
liberty,  and  from  whofe  liberality  the  beft  of  their 
kings  acknowledged  the  crowns  they  wore,  did  intend 
to  give  up  their  perfons,  liberties  and  eftates  to  him, 
who  was  a  ftranger,  mofl  efpecially  when  they  would 
not  receive  him  till  he  had  fworn  to  the  fame  laws 
by  which  the  others  had  reigned,  of  w^hich  one  was 
(as  appears  by  the  ad:  of  the  Conventus  Pananglicus) 
that  "■  Reges  a  facerdotibus  &  fenioribus  populi  eli- 
gantur,  the  kings  iliould  be  eledled  by  the  clergy 
and  elders  of  the  people."  By  thefe  means  he 
was  advanced  to  the  crown,  to  which  he  could  have 
no  title,  unlefs  they  had  the  right  of  conferring  it 
Upon  him.  Here  was  therefore  no  force,  deceit  or 
error  ,  and  whatfoever  equity  thera  might  be  to  re- 
lieve one  that  had  been  forced,  frighted  or  circum- 
vented, it  was  nothing  to  this  cafe.     We  do  not  find 

*  Addit.  Mat.  Par. 

f  Bcnas  &  approbatas  andquas  regnl  leges,  quas  fandi  &-  pii 
reges  ejas  antecefTores,  3c  niaxime  F.Cwardus  Taiait,  ir.violabilittr 
oblcrvare* 

Vol.  II.  L  that 


cc 


t^e  DISCOURSES  Chap.  III. 

that  William  the  fecond,  or  Henry,  were  forced  to  be 
kings;  no  fword  was  put  to  their  throats;  and  for 
any  thing  we  know,  the  Englifh  nation  was  not  then 
fo  contemptible  but  men  might  have  been  found  in  the 
world,  who  would  willingly  have  accepted  the  crown, 
and  even  their  elder  brother  Robert  would  not  have 
refufed  :  but  the  nobility  and  commons  trufting  to 
their  oaths  and  promifes,  thought  fit  to  prefer  them 
before  him ;  and  when  he  endeavoured  to  impofe 
himfelf  upon  the  nation  by  force,  they  fo  feverelv 
puniflied  him,  that  no  better  proof  can  be  required 
to  (hew  that  they  were  accuftomed  to  have  no  other 
kings  than  fuch  as  they  approved.  And  this  was  one 
of  the  cuftoms  that  all  their  kings  fwore  to  maintain, 
it  being  as  antient,  juft,  and  well  approved  as  any 
other. 

Having  already  proved,  that  all  the  kings  we 
have  had  fincc  that  time,  have  come  in  upon  the 
fame  title  ;  that  the  Saxon  laws  to  which  all  have 
fworn,  continue  to  be  of  force  amongft  us,  and  that 
the  words  pronounced  four  times  on  the  four  fides  of 
the  fcaffold  by  the  archbifliop,  '*  Will  ye  have  thi« 
'*  man  to  reign  ?"  do  teftify  it;  I  may  fpare  the  pains 
of  a  repetition,  and  juflly  conclude,  that  if  there 
was  neither  force  nor  fraud,  fear  nor  error  to  be  pre- 
tended by  the  iirll,  there  could  be  none  in  thofe  that 
followed. 

But  tlie  '^  obierva-tionof  this  oathmaybe  grievous/' 
It  I  received  money  the  laft  year  upon  bond,  promife, 
or  fale  of  a  manor  or  farm,  can  it  be  thought 
grievous  to  me  to-be  compelled  to  repay,  or  to  make 
over  the  land  according  to  my  agreement  ?  Or  if  I 
did  not  feal  the  bond  till  I  Iiad  the  money,  muft  not 
I  perform  the  condition,  or  at  the  leaft  reftore  what 
I  had  received  ?  If  it  be  grievous  to  any  king  to  pre- 
ferve  the  liberties^  lives,  and  ellates  of  his  fubjeds, 

.         .   and 


1 


Sea.  17;  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      147 

and  to  govern  according  to  their  laws,  let  him  re-- 
fign  the  crown,  and  the  people  to  whom  the  oath 
was  made,  will  probably  releafe  him.  Others  may 
poffibly  be  found  who  will  not  think  it  grievous  : 
or  if  none  will  accept  a  crown  unlefs  they  may  do 
what  they  pleafe,  the  people  muft  bear  the  misfor- 
tune of  being  obliged  to  govern  themfelves,  or  to 
inftitute  fome  other  fort  of  magiftracy  that  will  be 
fatisfied  with  a  lefs  exorbitant  power.  Perhaps  they 
may  fucceed  as  well  as  fome  others  have  done, 
who  without  being  brought  to  that  neceffity,  have 
voluntarily  caft  themfelves  into  the  mifery  of  living 
without  the  majeftic  fplendor  of  a  monarch:  or  if 
that  fail,  they  may,  as  their  laft  refuge,  furrender 
up  themfelves  to  Ikvery.  When  that  is  done,  we 
will  acknowledge  that  whatfoever  we  have  is  derived 
from  the  favour  of  our  mafler.  But  no  fuch  thing 
yet  appearing  amongfl  us,  we  may  be  pardoned  if  we 
think  we  are  free-men  governed  by  our  own  laws, 
and  that  no  man  has  a  power  over  us,  which  is  not 
given  and  regulated  by  them  ;  nor  that  any  thing  but 
a  new  law  made  by  our  felves,  can  exempt  our 
kings  from  the  obligation  of  performing  their  oaths 
taken,  to  govern  according  to  the  old,  in  the  true 
fenfe  of  the  words,  as  they  are  underftood  in  our 
language  by  thofe  who  give  them,  and  conducing  to 
the  ends  for  which  they  are  given,  which  can  be  no 
other  than  to  defend  us  from  all  manner  of  arbitrary 
power,  and  to  fix  a  rule  to  which  we  are  to  conform 
our  a(!^ions,  and  from  which,  according  to  our 
deferts,  we  may  expe(ft  reward  or  punifhment. 
And  thofe  who  by  prevarications,  cavils  or  equivo- 
cations, endeavour  to  difTolve  thefe  obligations,  do 
either  mallciouily  betray  the  caufe  of  kings,  by  re- 
prefenting  them  to  the  world  as  men  who  prefer  the 
latisfadion  of  their  irregular  appetites  before  the  per- 

L  z  formance 


148  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

formance  of  their  duty,  and  trample  under  foot  the 
iiioft  facred  bonds  of  human  fociety  ;  or  from  the 
groiTeft  ignorance  do  not  fee,  that  by  teaching  nations 
how  Httle  they  can  rely  upon  the  oaths  of  their 
princes,  they  inflruft  them  as  Httle  to  obferve  their 
own  'y  and  that  not  only  becaufe  men  are  generally 
inclined  to  follow  the  examples  of  thofe  in  power, 
but  from  a  moil:  certain  concluiion,  that  he  who 
breaks  his  part  of  a  contract  cannot  without  the 
utmoft  impudence  and  folly  expert  the  performance 
of  the  other  -,  nothing  being  more  known  amongft 
men,  than  that  all  contracts  are  of  fuch  mutual 
obligation,  that  he  who  fails  of  his  part  difcharges 
the  other.  If  this  be  fo  between  man  and  man,  it 
muft  needs  be  fo  between  one  and  many  millions  of 
men  :  If  he  were  free,  becaufe  he  fays  he  is,  every 
man  muft  be  free  alfowhenhe  pleafes  j  if  a  private  man 
who  receives  no  benefit,  or  perhaps  prejudice  from 
a  contract,  be  obliged  to  perform  the  conditions, 
much  more  are  kings  who  receive  the  greateft  ad- 
vantages the  world  can  give.  As  they  are  not  by 
themfelves  nor  for  themfelves,  fo  they  are  not 
different  in  fpecie  from  other  men :  they  are  born, 
live  and  die  as  we  all  do.  The  fame  law  of  truth 
andjuftice  is  given  to  all  by  God  and  nature,  and 
perhaps  I  may  fay  the  performance  of  it  is  moft 
riliorouflv  exacted  from  the  ^[reatefl  of  men.  The 
liberty  of  perjury  cannot  be  a  privilege  annexed  to 
crowns ;  and  'tis  abfurd  to  think  that  the  moft 
venerable  authority  that  can  be  conferred  upon  a 
man  is  increafed  by  a  liberty  to  commit,  or  im- 
punity in  committing  fuch  crimes  as  are  the  greateft 
aoro-ravations  of  infamv  to  tlic  bafeft  villains  in  the 
v/orld, 


SECT. 


Sea.  18.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      14 j 

SECT.      XVIII. 

T/je  7iest  in  blood  to  deceafcd  kings  caiinot  generally  b'. 
faid  to  be  kings  till  they  are  crowned. 

yt  I  AIS  hereupon  ufually  objedled,  that  kings  do 
J^  not  come  in  by  contradl  nor  by  oath,  but 
are  kings  by,  or  according  to  proximity  of  blood, 
before  they  are  crov/ned.  Tho'  this  be  a  bold  pro- 
pofition,  I  will  not  fay  'tis  univerfally  falfe.  'Tis 
poflible  that  in  fome  places  the  rule  of  fucceffion 
may  be  fet  down  fo  precifely,  that  in  fome  c:fes 
every  man  may  be  able  to  fee  and  know  the  fenfe, 
as  Well  as  the  perfon  deiigned  to  be  the  fucceifor  : 
but  before  I  acknowledge  it  to  be  univerfally  true,  I 
muft  delire  to  know  what  this  rule  of  fucceffion  is, 
and  from  whence  it  draws  its  original. 

I  think  I  may  be  excufed  if  I  make  thefe  fcruples, 
-becaufe  I  find  the  thing  in  difpute  to  be  varioufly  ad- 
judged in  feveral  places,  and  have  obferved  five  dif- 
ferent manners  of  difpofing  crowns  efteemed  here- 
ditary, befides  an  infinite  number  of  collateral  con- 
troverfies  arifing  from  them,  of  which  we  have  di- 
vers examples  j  and  if  there  be  one  univerfal  rule 
appointed,  one  of  thefe  only  can  be  right,  and  the 
others  muft  be  vicious.  The  firft  gives  the  inheri- 
tance to  the  eldefl  male  of  the  eldeft  legitimate  line, 
as  in  France,  according  to  that  which  they  call  the  Sa- 
lique  law.  The  fecond,  to  the  eldeft  legitimate  male 
of  the  reigning  family,  as  antiently  in  Spain,  ac- 
cording to  which  the  brother  of  the  deceafed  king 
has  been  often  if  not  always  preferred  before  the  fon, 
if  he  were  elder,  as  may  appear  by  the  difpute  be- 
tween Corbis  and  Orfua,  cited  before  from  Titus 
Livius;  and  in  the  fame  country  during  the  reign  of 
the  Goths,  the  eldeft  male  fucceeded,  whether  le- 

L  3         -    "  gitimate 


150  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill 

gitimate  or  illegitimate.  The  fourth  receives  females 
or  their  defcendants,  without  any  other  condition 
4iftinguifhing  them  from  males,  except  that  the 
younger  brother  is  preferred  before  the  elder  fifter, 
but  the  daughter  of  the  elder  brother  is  preferr'd  be- 
fore the  fon  of  the  younger.  The  fifth  gives  the 
inheritance  to  females  under  a  condition,  as  in  Swe- 
den, where  they  inherit,  unlefs  they  marry  out  of 
the  country  without  the  confent  of  the  eftates ;  ac- 
cording to  which  rule  Charles  Guftavus  was  chofen, 
as  any  ftranger  might  have  been,  tho'  fon  to  a  fifter 
of  Guftavus  Adolphus,  who  by  marrying  a  Ger^ 
man  prince  had  forfeited  her  right.  And  by  the 
fame  adt  of  eflates,  by  which  her  eldeft  fon  was 
chofen,  and  the  crown  entailed  upon  the  heirs  of 
his  body,  her  fecond  fon  the  prince  Adolphus  was 
wholly  excluded. 

Till  thefe  queftions  are  decided  by  a  judge  of  fuch 
an  undoubted  authority,  that  all  men  may  fafely  fubr 
mit,  'tis  hard  for  any  man  who  really  feeks  the  fa- 
tisfaftion  of  his  confcience,  to  know  whether  the 
law  of  God  and  nature  (tho'  he  fliould  believe  there 
is  one  general  law)  do  juftify  the  cuftoms  of  the  an- 
tient  *  Medes  and  Sabeans,  mentioned  by  the  poet, 
who  admitted  females,  or  thofe  of  France  which 
totally  exclude  them  as  unfit  to  reign  over  men,  and 
utterly  unable  to  perform  the  duty  of  a  fupreme  ma- 
giftrate,  as  we  fee  they  are  every  where  excluded 
from  the  exercife  of  all  other  offices  in  the  common- 
wealth. If  it  be  faid  that  we  ought  to  follow  the 
cuftoms  of  our  own  country,  I  anfwer  that  thofe  of 
our  own  country  deferve  to  be  obferved,  becaufe  they 
are  of  our  own  country  :  but  they  are  no  more  to. 
be  called  the  laws  of  God  and  nature  than  thofe  qf 

Medis  levlbiifque  Sabaeis 


Imperat  hie  fexus,  reginarumque  fub  armis 
JJarbaries  para-  magna  jacet.     Lucan^, 


Sea.  1 8.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      151 

France  or  Germany  -,  and  tho'  I  do  not  believe  that 
any  general  law  is  appointed,  I  wifli  I  were  fare  that 
our  cuftoms  in  this  point  were  not  more  repugnant 
to  the  light  of  nature,  and  prejudicial  to  our  felves, 
than  thofe  of  fome  other  nations.     But  if  I  fliould 
be  fo  much  an  Englifliman,  to  think  the  v/ill  of  God 
to  have  been  more  particularly  revealed  to  our  an- 
ceftors,  than  to  any  other  nation,  and  that  all  of 
them  ought  to  learn  from  us  -,  yet  it  would  be  difli- 
cult  to  decide  many  queflions  that  may  arife.     For 
tho'  the  parliament  in  the  thirty  fixth  of  Henry 
VI.  made  an  ad  in  favour  of  Richard  duke  of  York, 
defcended  from  a  daughter  of  Mortimer,  who  mar- 
ried the  daughter  of  the  duke  of  Clarence,  elder 
brother  to  John  of  Gaunt,  they  rather  afferted  their 
own  power  of  giving  the  crown  to  whom  the  pleaf- 
ed,  than  determined  the  queftion.     For  if  they  had 
believed  that  the  crown  had  belonged  to  him  by  a 
general  and  eternal  law,  they  muft  immediately  have 
rejefted  Henry  as  an  ufurper,  and  put  Richard  into 
the  poffeffion  of  his  right,  which  they  did  not.  And 
tho'  they  did  fomething  like  to  this  in  the  cafes  of 
Maud  the  emprefs  in  relation  to  king  Stephen,  and 
her  fon  Henry  the  fecond  -,  and  of  Henry  the  feventh 
in  relation  to  the  houfe  of  York,  both  before  he  had 
married  a  daughter  of  it,  and  after  her  death  ;  they 
did  the  contrary  in  the  cafes  of  William  the  firft  and 
fecond,  Henry  the  firft,  Stephen,  John,  Richard  the 
third,    Henry  the  feventh,    Mary,   Elizabeth,   and 
others.     So  that,  for  any  thing  I  can  yet  find,  'tis 
equally  difficult  to  difcover  the  true  fenfe  of  the  law 
of  nature  that  fliould  be  a  guide  to  my  confcience, 
whether  I  fo  far  fubmit  to  the  laws  of  my  country, 
to  think  that  England  alone  has  produced  men  that 
rightly  under jftand  it,  or  examine  the  laws  and  prac- 
tices of  other  nations. 

L  4  V^hilft 


?5^  DISCOURSES       Chap.  Ill, 

Wliilft  this  remains  undecided,  'tis  impoffible  for 
me  to  know  to  whom  I  owe  the  obedience  that  is 
exacted  from  me.  Jf  I  were  a  Frenchman,  I  could 
not  tell  whether  I  ow'd  allegiance  to  the  king  of 
Spain,  duke  of  Lorrain,  duke  of  Savoy,  or  many 
others  defcended  from  daughters  of  the  houfe  of 
Valois,  one  of  whom  ought  to  inherit,  if  the  in^ 
heritance  belongs  to  females ;  or  to  the  houfe  of 
Bourbon,  whole  only  title  is  founded  upon  the  ex- 
plufion  of  them.  The  like  controverfies  will  be  in 
all  places ;  and  he  that  would  put  mankind  upon 
fuch  enquiries,  goes  about  to  fubvert  all  the  govern- 
ments of  the  world,  and  arms  every  man  to  the 
deftruftion  of  his  neighbour. 

We  ought  to  be  informed  when  this  right  began  3 
if  we  had  the  genealogy  of  eveiy  man  from  Noah, 
and  the  crowns  of  every  nation  had  fince  his  time 
continued  in  one  line,  we  were  only  to  inquire  in- 
to how  many  kingdoms  he  appointed  the  world  to 
be  divided,  and  how  well  the  divifion  we  fee  at  this 
day  agrees  with  the  allotment  made  by  him.  But 
mankind  having  for  many  ages  lain  under  fuch  a  vaft 
jconfufion,  that  no  man  pretends  to  know  his  own 
original,  except  fom.e  Jews,  and  the  princes  of  the 
houfe  of  Auliria,  we  cannot  fo  eafily  arrive  at  the 
end  of  our  work  \  and  the  fcriptures  making  no  other 
mention  of  this  part  of  the  world,  than  what  may 
induce  us  to  think  it  was  given  to  the  fons  of  Japhet, 
we  have  nothing  that  can  lead  us  to  guefs  how  it 
-  was  to  be  fubdivided,  nor  to  whom  the  fevera!  parcels 
were  given  :  fo  that  the  difficulties  are  abfolutely  in- 
extricable ;  and  tho'  it  were  true,  that  fome  one  man 
had  a  right  to^  every  parcel  that  is  known  to  us,  it  could 
|3e  of  no  ufe  ;  for  that  right  muft  neceiTarily  perifli 
W^ich  no  man  can  prove,  nor  indeed  claim.  But 
as  all  natural  rights  by  inheritance  muft  be  by  defcent, 

thi§ 


Sea.  18.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      153 

this  defcent  not  being  proved,  there  can  be  no  na- 
tural right ;  and  all  rights  being  either  natural,  cre- 
ated or  acquired,  this  right  to  crowns  not  being  na- 
tural, muil:  be  created  or  acquired,  or  none  at  all. 

There  being  no  general  law  common  to  all  na- 
tions, creating  a  right  to  crowns  (as  has  been  proved 
by  the  feveral  methods  ufed  by  feveral  nations  in  the 
difpofal  of  them,  according  to  which  all  thofe  that 
we  know  are  enjoy'd)  we  mufl  feek  the  right  con- 
cerning which  we  difpute,  from  the  particular  con- 
ftitutions  of  every  nation,  or  we  ihall  be  able  to  find 
none. 

Acquir'd  rights  are  obtained,  as  men  fay,  either 
by  fair  means  or  by  foul,  that  is,  by  force  or  by  con- 
fent :  fuch  as  are  gained  by  force,  may  be  recovered 
by  force ;  and  the  extent  of  thofe  that  are  enjoy'd 
by  confent,  can  only  be  known  by  the  reafons  for 
which,  or  the  conditions  upon  which  that  confent 
was  obtained,  that  is  to  fay,  by  the  laws  of  every 
people.  According  to  thefe  laws  it  cannot  be  faid 
that  there  is  a  king  in  every  nation  before  he  is  crown- 
ed. John  Sobietski  nov/  reigning  in  Poland,  had  no 
relation  in  blood  to  the  form.er  kings,  nor  any  title 
till  he  was  chofen.  The  laft  king  of  Sweden  ac- 
knowledged he  had  none,  but  was  freely  elefted ; 
and  the  crown  being  conferred  upon  him  and  the 
heirs  of  his  body,  if  the  prefent  king  dies  without 
iffue,  the  right  of  eledting  a  fuccelTor  returns  un- 
doubtedly to  the  eftates  of  the  country.  The  crown 
of  Denmark  was  elective  till  it  was  made  hereditary 
by  an  acft  of  the  general  diet,  held  at  Copenhagen 
in  the  year  1660^  and  'tis  impoflible  that  a  right 
fhould  otherwife  accrue  to  a  younger  brother  of  the 
houfe  of  Holftien,  which  is  derived  from  a  young- 
er brother  of  the  counts  of  Oldenburgh.  The  Ro- 
ffizn  empire  having  pafled  through  the  hands  of 

many 


154  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

many  peiTons  of  different  nations,  no  way  relating  to 
each  other  in  blood,  was  by  Conftantine  transferred 
to  Conilantinople  ;  and  after  many  revolutions  com- 
ing to  Theodofius,  by  birth  a  Spaniard,  was  divided 
between  his  two  fons  Arcadius  and  Honorius.  From 
thence  paffing  to  fuch  as  could  gain  moft  credit  with 
the  foldiers,  the  Weftern  empire  being  brought 
almoft  to  nothing,  was  reftored  by  Charles  the  great 
of  France  -,  and  continuing  for  fome  time  in  his  de- 
fcendants,  came  to  the  Germans ;  who  having 
created  fcveral  emperors  of  the  houfes  of  Suevia, 
Saxony,  Bavaria  and  others,  as  they  pleafed,  about 
three  hundred  years  pad  chofe  Rodolphus  of  Auftria: 
and  tho'  fince  that  time  they  have  not  had  any  em- 
peror who  was  not  of  that  family ;  yet  fuch  as  were 
chofen  had  nothing  to  recommend  them  but  the 
merits  of  their  anceftors,  their  own  perfonal  virtues, 
or  fuch  political  confiderations  as  might  arife  from 
the  power  of  their  hereditary  countries,  which  being 
joined  with  thofe  of  the  empire,  might  enable  them 
to  make  the  better  defence  againft  the  Turks.  But 
in  this  line  alfo  they  have  had  little  regard  to  in- 
heritance according  to  blood  ;  for  the  elder  branch  of 
the  family  is  that  which  reigns  in  Spain ;  and  the 
empire  continues  in  the  defcendants  of  Ferdinand 
younger  brother  to  Charles  the  fifth,  tho'  fo  unfix'd 
even  to  this  time,  that  the  prefent  emperor  Leopold 
was  in  great  danger  of  being  rcjedled. 

If  it  be  faid  that  thefe  are  eledive  kingdoms,  and 
our  author  fpeaks  of  fuch  as  are  hereditary;  I  anfwer, 
that  if  what  he  fays  be  true,  there  can  be  no  ele6tive 
kingdom,  and  every  nation  has  a  natural  lord  to 
whom  obedience  is  due.  But  if  fome  are  eledive, 
all  might  have  been  fo  if  they  had  pleafed,  unlefs  it 
can  be  proved,  that  God  created  fome  under  a 
jieceffity  of  fubjedlon,  and  left  to  others  the  enjoy- 
ment 


I 


sea.  1 8.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT. 

ment  of  their  liberty.     If  this  be  fo,    the  nations 
that  are  born  under  that  neceflity  may  be  faid  to  have 
a  natural  lord,   who  has  all  the  power  in  himfelf, 
before  he  is  crowned,  or  any  part  conferred  on  him 
by  the  confent  of  thepeople^  but  it  cannot  extend 
to  others.     And  he  who  pretends  a  right  over  any 
nation  upon  that  account,  ftands  obliged  to  fliew 
when  and  how  that  nation  came  to  be  difcriminated 
by  God  from  others,  and  deprived   of  that  liberty 
which  he  in  goodnefs  had  granted  to  the  reft  of  man- 
kind.   *I  Gonfefs  I  think  there  is  no  fuch  right,  and 
need  no  better  proof  than  the  various  waysof  difpofing 
inheritances   in  feveral  countries,  which  not  being 
naturally  or  univerfally  better  or  worfe  than  another, 
cannot  fpring  from  any  other  root,  than  the  confent 
of  the  feveral  nations  where  they  are  in  force,  and 
their  opinions  that  fuch  methods  were  beft  for  them. 
But  if  God  have  made  a  difcrimination  of  people, 
he  that  would  thereupon  ground  a  title  to  the  do- 
minion of  any  one,  muft  prove  that  nation  to  be 
under  the  curfe  of  flavery,  which  for  any  thing  I 
know,  w^as  only  denounced  againft  Cham :  and  'tis  as 
hard  to  determine  whether  the  fenfe  of  it  be  temporal, 
fpiritual,  or  both,  as  to  tell  precifely  what  nations  by 
being  only   defcended   from  him,    fall  under  the 
penalties  threatned, 

If  thefe  therefore  be  either  intirely  falfe,  or  im- 
poffible  to  be  proved  true,  there  is  no  difcrim.ination, 
or  not  known  to  us  j  and  every  people  has  a  right  of 
difpofing  of  their  government,  as  well  as  the  Polan- 
ders,  Danes,  Swedes,  Germans,  and  fuch  as  are 
or  were  under  the  Roman  empire.  And  if  any 
nation  has  a  natural  lord  before  he  be  admitted  by 
their  confent,  it  muft  be  by  a  peculiar  ad:  of  their 
own,  as  the  crown  of  France  by  an  ad:  of  that 
liation,  which  they  call  the  Salique  law,  is  made 

*  hereditary 


156  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

hereditary  to  males  in  a  direcfl  line,  or  the  ncareft  to 
the  dired: ;  and  others  in  other  places  are  otherwife 
difpofed. 

I  might  reft  here  with  full  aflurance  that  no  dif- 
ciple  of  Filmer  can  prove  this  of  any  people  in  the 
world,  nor  give  fo  much  as  the  fhadow  of  a 
reafon  to  perfuade  us  there  is  any  fuch  thing  in  any 
nation,  or  at  leaft  in  thofe  where  we  are  concerned  ; 
and  prefume  little  regard  will  be  had  to  what  he  has 
faid,  fince  he  cannot  prove  of  any  that  which  he  fo 
boldly  affirms  of  all.  But  becaufe  good  men  ought 
to  have  no  other  objed:  than  truth,  which  in  matters 
of  this  importance  can  never  be  made  too  evident,  I 
will  venture  to  go  farther  and  aflert,  that  as  the 
various  ways  by  which  feveral  nations  difpofe  of 
the  fucceffion  to  their  refpeflive  crowns,  fhew  they 
were  fubjedl  to  no  other  lav^  than  their  own,  which 
they  might  have  made  different,  by  the  fame  right 
they  made  it  to  be  what  it  is,  even  thofe  who  have 
the  greateft  veneration  for  the  reigning  families,  and 
the  higheft  regard  for  proximity  of  blood,  have 
always  preferr'd  the  fafety  of  the  comimonwealth 
before  the  concernments  of  any  perfon  or  family  5 
and  have  not  only  laid  afide  the  neareft  in  blood,  when 
they  wxre  found  to  be  notorioufly  vicious  and  wicked, 
but  when  they  have  thought  it  more  convenient  to 
take  others :  and  to  prove  this  I  intend  to  make  ufe  of 
no  other  examples  than  thofe  I  find  in  the  hiftories 
of  Spain,  France  and  England. 

Whilft  the  Goths  governed  Spain,  not  above  four 
perfons  in  the  fpace  of  three  hundred  years  were  the 
immediate  fucceffors  of  their  fathers,  but  the  brothei?, 
coufin  german,  or  fome  other  man  of  the  families 
of  the  Baithei  or  Amalthei  was  preferred  before  the 
children  of  the  deceafed  king:  and  if  it  be  faid,  this 
was  according  to  the  law  of  that  kingdom,  I  anfwer, 
that  it  was  therefore  in  the  power  of  that  nation  to 

mak  Q 


Sea.  i8.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      157 

make  laws  for  themfelves,  and  confequently  others 
have  the  fame  right.  One  of  their  kings  called 
Wamba  *  was  depofed  and  made  a  monk  after  he 
had  reigned  well  many  years;  hut  falling  into  a 
fwound,  and  his  friends  thinking  him  pad  recovery, 
cut  off  his  hair,  and  put  a  monk's  frock  upon  him, 
that,  according  to  the  fuperftition  of  thofe  times, 
he  might  die  in  it ;  and  the  cutting  off  the  hair  being 
a  mofl  difgraceful  thing  amongft  the  Goths  -f*,  they 
would  not  reftore  him  to  his  authority.  Suintila 
another  of  their  kings  being  deprived  of  the  crown 
for  his  ill  government,  his  children  and  brothers 
were  excluded,  and  Sifinandus  crowned  in  his 
room  J. 

This  kingdom  being  not  long  after  overthrown  by 
the  Moors,  a  new  one  arofe  from  its  afhes  in  the 
perfon  of  Don  Pelayo  firfl:  king  of  the  Afturia's, 
which  increaiing  by  ^degrees,  atlaft  came  to  com- 
prehend all  Spain,  and  fo  continues  to  this  day :  but 
not  troubling  my  felf  with  all  the  deviations  from 
the  common  rule  in  the  collateral  lines  of  Navarre, 
Arragon  and  Portugal,  I  find  that  by  fifteen  fever  a  I 
inftances  in  that  one  feries  of  kings  in  the  Afturia's 
and  Leon  (who  afterwards  came  tobekingsof  Caftille) 
it  is  fully  proved,  that  what  refpedt  foever  they 
(hew'd  to  the  next  in  blood,  who  by  the  law  were 
to  fucceed,  they  preferred  fome  other  perfon,  as 
often  as  the  fupreme  law  of  "  taking  care  that 
*'  the  nation  might  receive  no  detriment,"  perfuaded 
them  to  it. 

Don  Pelayo  enjoy 'd  for  his  life  the  kingdom  con- 
ferred upon  him  by  the  Spaniards,  who  with  him  re- 
tired into  the  mountains  to  defend  themfelves  againft 
the  Moors,   and  w^as  fucceeded  by  his  fon  Favila, 

*  Saavedra  Coron.  Goth.  -f-  Mar.  Hift.  1.  5. 

J  Saaved.  Cor.  Goth, 

But 


15S  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIj^ 

But  tlio'  Favila  left  many  fons  when  he  died,  Al- 
phonfo  lirnamed  the  chafte  was  advanced  to  the 
crown,  and  they  all  laid  afide.  Fruela  fon  to  Al- 
phonfo  the  catholic,  was  for  his  cruelty  depofed, 
put  to  death,  and  his  fons  excluded.  ^  Aurelio  his 
couiin  german  fucceeded  him  ;  and  at  his  death  Si- 
lo, who  married  his  wife's  lifter,  was  preferred  be- 
fore the  males  of  the  blood  royal.  Alphonfo  firnam'd 
El  Cafto,  was  firft  violently  difpoffefs'd  of  the  crown 
by  a  baftard  of  the  royal  family  ;  but  he  being  dead, 
the  nobility  and  people  thinking  Alphonfo  more  fit 
to  be  a  monk  than  a  king,  gave  the  crown  to  Ber- 
mudo  called  El  Diacono ;  but  Bermudo  after  feveral 
years  religning  the  kingdom,  they  conceived  a  bet- 
ter opinion  of  Alphonfo,  and  made  him  king.  Al- 
phonfo dying  without  ilTue,  Don  Ramiro  fon  to 
Bermudo  was  preferred  before  the  nephews  of  Al- 
phonfo. Don  Ordonno,  fourth  from  Ramiro,  left 
four  legitimate  fons ;  but  they  being  young,  the 
eflates  laid  them  afide,  and  made  his  brother  Fruela 
kino-.  Fruela  had  many  children,  but  the  fame  eftates 
.  gave  the  crown  to  Alphonfo  the  fourth,  who  was  his 
nephew.  Alphonfo  turning  monk,  recommended 
his  fon  Ordonno  to  the  eftates  of  the  kingdom  ;  bat 
they  refufed  him,  and  made  his  brother  Ramiro  king. 
Ordonno  third  fon  to  Ramiro  dying,  left  a  fon  call- 
ed Bermudo ;  but  the  eftates  took  his  brother  San- 
clio,  and  advanced  him  to  the  throne.  Henry  the 
firft  being  accidentally  killed  in  his  youth,  left  only 
two  fifters,  Blanche  married  to  Lewis  fon  to  Philip 
Au^uft  kins:  of  France,  and  Bereno-uela  married  to 
A  lohonfo  king  of  Leon.  The  eftates  made  -f-  Fer- 
dinand, fon  of  Berenguela  the  youngeft  fifter,  king, 
excludins:  Blanche,  with  her  huiband  and  children 
for  being  ftrangers,  and  Berenguela  her  felf^  becaufe 

*  Mariana.  1,  13.  f  Mariana.  I.  12. 

they 


Sea.  18.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      159 

they  thought  not  fit  that  her  hufband  fliould  have 
any  part  in  the  government.     Alphonlb  El  Savio 
feems  to  have  been  a  very  good  prince ;  but  apply- 
ing himfelf  more  to  the  ftudy  of  aftrology  than  to 
affairs  of   government,    his   eldeft    fon   Ferdinand 
de  la  Cerda  dying,  and  leaving  his  fons  Alphonfo 
and  Ferdinand  very  young,  the  nobility,  clergy  and 
people  depofed  him,    excluded   his  grandchildren, 
and  gave  the  crown  to  Don  Sancho  his  younger  fon, 
firnamed  El  Bravo,  thinking  him  more  fit  to  com- 
mand them  againft  the  Moors,  than  an  old  aftrologer 
or  a  child.     Alphonfo  and  Sancho  being  dead,  Al- 
phonfo El  Defheredado  laid  claim  to  the  crown,  but 
it  was  given  to  Ferdinand  the  fourth,  and  Alphon- 
fo with  his  defcendants  the  dukes  de  Medina  Celi  re- 
main excluded  to  this  day.  Peter  firnamed  the  cruel 
w^as  twice  driven  out  of  the  kingdom,  and  at  laft 
killed  by  Bertrand  de  Guefclin  conftable  of  France, 
or  Flenry  count  of  Traftamara  his  baftard-brother, 
who  was  made  king  without  any  regard  to  the 
daughters  of  Peter,  or  to  thehoufe  of  la  Cerda.  Hen- 
ry the  fourth  left  a  daughter  called  ^  Joan,  whom  he 
declared  his  heir ;  but  the  eflates  gave  the  king- 
dom to  Ifabel  his  fifter,  and  crowned  her  vi^ith  Fer- 
dinand of  Arragon  her  hulband.     Joan  daughter  to 
this  Ferdinand  and  Ifabel  falling  mad,  the  eftates 
committed  the  care  of  the  government  to  her  father 
Ferdinand,  and  after  his  death  to  Charles  her  fon. 
But  the  French  have  taught  us,  that  when  a  king 
dies,  his  next  heir  is  really  king  before  he  take  his 
oath,  or  be  crowned.     From  them  we  learn  that  Le 
mort  faifit  le  vif.     And  yet  I  know  no  hiftory  that 
proves  more  plainly  than  theirs,  that  there  neither 
is  nor  can  be  in  any  man,  a  right  to  the  government 
of  a  people,  which  does  not  receive  its  being,  man- 

*  Mariana,  I.  24. 

ner 


iiSo  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

ner  and  meafure  from  the  law  of  that  country  ; 
which  I  hope  to  juftify  by  four  reafons. 

I .  When  a  king  of  Pharamond's  race  died,  the 
kingdom  was  divided  into  as  many  parcels  as  he  had 
fons ;  which  could  not  have  been,  if  one  certain 
heir  had  been  afiigned  by  nature,  for  he  ought  to 
have  had  the  whole :  and  if  the  kingdom  might  be 
divided,  they  who  inhabited  the  feveral  parcels, 
could  not  know  to  whom  they  owed  obedience,  till 
the  diviiion  was  made,  unlefs  he  who  was  to  be  king 
of  Paris,  Metz,  Soiffons  or  Orleans,  had  worn  the 
name  of  his  kingdom  upon  his  forehead.  But  in 
truth,  if  there  might  be  a  divifion,  the  dodlrine  is 
falfe,  and  there  was  no  lord  of  the  whole.  This 
wound  will  not  be  healed  by  faying,  the  father  ap- 
pointed the  divifion,  and  that  by  the  law  of  nature 
every  man  may  difpofe  of  his  own  as  he  thinks  fit ; 
for  we  fliall  foon  prove  that  the  kingdom  of  France 
neither  was,  nor  is  difpofeable  as  a  patrimony  or 
chattel.  Befides,  if  that  a6t  of  kings  had  been  then 
grounded  upon  the  law  of  nature,  they  might  do 
the  like  at  this  day.  But  the  law,  by  which  fuch 
divifions  were  made,  having' been  abrogated  by  the 
allembly  of  cftates  in  the  time  of  *  Hugh  Capet, 
and  nzvtx  pradifed  fince,  it  follows  that  they  were 
grounded  upon  a  temporary  law,  and  not  upon  the 
law  of  nature  which  is  eternal.  If  this  were  not  fo, 
i\\^  pretended  certainty  could  not  be ;  for  no  man 
could  know  to  whom  the  lad  king  had  bequeathed 
the  whole  kingdom,  or  parcels  of  it,  till  the  w^ill . 
were  opened  3  and  that  muft  be  done  before  fuch 
witnefles  as  may  deferve  credit  in  a  matter  of  this 
iaiportance,  and  are  able  to  judge  whether  the  be- 
quefi:  be  rightly  made ;  for  otherwife  no  man  could 
know,  wdietlier  the  kingdom  was  to  have  one  lord 

*  Illii,  de  Fr.  en  k  vie  de  Ikigues  Capet, 

t  or 


Sea.  iS.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      16 1 

or  many,  nor  v/ho  he  or  they  v/ere  to  be ;  which 
intermiillon  muft  neceffarily  fubvert  their  polity,  and 
this  dodlrine.  But  the  truth  is,  the. moil  monarchi- 
cal men  amono^  them  are  fo  far  from  acknowlecie- 
ing  any  fuch  right  to  be  in  the  king,  of  alienating, 
bequeathing  or  dividing  the  kingdom,  that  they  do 
not  allow  him  the  right  of  making  a  will  5  and  that 
of  the  lafl:  king  *  Lewis  the  thirteenth  touching  the 
regency  during  the  minority  of  his  fon  was  of  no 
Gffcd. 

2.  This  matter  was  made  more  clear  under  the 
fecond  race.  If  a  lord  had  been  affig-ned  to  them 
by  nature,  he  muft  have  been  of  tlie  royal  family : 
but  Pepin  had  no  other  title  to  the  crown  except 
the  merits  of  his  father,  and  his  own,  approved  by 
the  nobility  and  people  who  made  him  king.  He 
had  three  fons,  the  eldeft  was  made  king  of  Italy, 
and  dying  before  him  left  a  fon  called  Bernard  heir 
of  that  kingdom.  The  eftates  of  France  divided 
what  remained  between  Charles  the  great  and  Car-* 
loman.^l-  The  laft  of  thefe  dying  in  few  years  left 
many  fons,  but  the  nobility  m.ade  Charles  king  of 
all  France,  and  he  difpoflefled  Bernard  of  the  king- 
dom of  Italy  inherited  from  his  father  :  fo  that  he 
alfo  was  not  kins;  of  the  whole,  before  the  exoulfi- 
on  of  Bernard  the  fon  of  his  elder  brother ;  nor  of 
Aquitain,  which  by  inheritance  (hould  have  belong- 
ed to  the  children  of  his  younger  brother,  any  other- 
wife  than  by  the  will  of  the  eftates.  Lewis  the  de- 
bonair fucceeded  upon  the  fame  title,  was  depofed 
and  put  into  a  m.onaftery  by  his  three  fons  Lothair, 
Pepin  and  Lewis,  whom  he  had  by  his  firft  wife. 
But  tho'  thefe  left  many  fons,  the  kingdom  came  to 
Charles  the  bald.     The  nobility  and  people  difii:;- 

*  Mem.  du  Due.  de  la  Rochcfocauljc. 
+  Paul.  ^mil.  hift.  Frauc. 

Vol,  II.  M  inii 


iGi  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

• 

^ng  the  eldeft  fon  of  Charles,  gave  the  kingdom  to 
Lewis  le    begue,  v^ho  had  a  legitimate  fon  called 
Charles  le  fimple  -,  and  two  baftards,  Lewis  and  Car- 
loman,  who  were  made  kings.     Carloman  had  a 
fon  called  Lewis  le  faineant ;  he  was  made  king,  but 
afterwards  depofed  for  his  vicious  life.     Charles  Ic 
■gros  fucceeded  him,  but  for  his  ill  government  was 
alfo  depofed  >  and  Odo,  vid:io  was  a  flranger  to  the 
royal  blood,  was  made  king.     The  fame  nobility 
that  had  made  five  kings  fince  Lewis  le  begue,  now 
made  Charles  le  fimple  king,  who  according  to  his 
name,  was  entrapped  at  Peronne  by  Ralph  duke  of 
Burgundy,  and  forced  to  refign  his  crown,  leaving 
only  a  fon  called  Lewis,  who  fled  into  England. 
Ralph  being  dead,  they  took  Lewis  firnamed  Ou- 
tremer,    and  placed  him  in  the  throne :    he  had 
two  fons,  Lothair  and  Charles.     Lothair  fucceeded 
him,  and  died  without  ifllie.     Charles  had  as  fair  a 
title  as  could  be  bv  birth,  and  the  eftates  confeiTed 
it  3  but  their  ambaifadors  told  him,  that  he  having 
by  an  unworthy  life  render'd  himfelf  unw^orthy  of 
the  crown,  they,  whofe  principal  care  was  to  have 
a  good  prince  at  the  head  of  them,  had  chofen  Hugh 
Capet ;  and  the  crown  continues  in  his  race  to  this 
day,  tho'  not  altogether  without  interruption.  Ro- 
bert fon  to  Hugh  Capet  fucceeded  him.     He  left 
two  fons,  Robert  and  Henry  5  but  Henry  the  young- 
er fon  appearing  to  the  eftates  of  the  kingdom  to  be 
more  fit  to  reign  than  his  elder  brother,  they  made 
him  king,    Robert  and  his  defcendants  continuing 
dukes  of  Burgundy  only  for  about  ten  generations, 
at  which  time  his  ifliie  male  failing,  that  dutchy  re- 
turned to  the  crown  during  the  life  of  king  John, 
who  gave  it  to  his  fecond  fon  Philip  for  an  Apan- 
nage  ftill  depending  upon  the  crown.     The  fame 
province  of  Burgundy  was  by  the  treaty  of  Madrid 


granted 


sea.  1 8.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      163 

granted  to  the  emperor  Charles  the  fifth,  by  Fran- 
cis the  firft  :  but  the  people  refufed  to  be  alienated, 
and  the  eftates  of  the  kingdom  approved  their  refu- 
fal.  By  the  fame  authority  Charles  the  fixth  was 
removed  from  the  government,  when  he  appeared 
to  be  mad ;  and  other  examples  of  a  like  nature 
niay  be  alledged.  From  which  we  may  fafely  con- 
clude, that  if  the  death  of  one  king  do  really  inveft 
the  next  heir  with  the  right  and  power,  or  that  he 
who  is  fo  inverted,  be  fubje6t  to  no  law  but  hia 
own  will,  all  matters  relating  to  that  kingdom  muft 
have  been  horribly  confufed  during  the  reigns  of 
22  kings  of  Pharamond's  race  ;  they  can  have  had 
no  rightful  king  from  the  death  of  Chilperic  to 
king  John :  and  the  fucceffion  iince  that  time  is 
very  liable  to  be  queftioned,  if  not  utterly  over- 
thrown by  the  houfe  of  Auftria  and  others,  who  by 
the  counts  of  Haplburg  derive  their  defcent  from 
Pharamond,  and  by  the  houfe  of  Lorrain  claiming 
from  Charles,  who  was  excluded  by  Capet ;  all 
which  is  moft  abfurd,  and  they  who  pretend  it  bring 
as  much  confufion  into  their  own  laws,  and  uoon 
the  polity  of  their  own  nation,  as  fhame  and  guilt 
upon  the  memory  of  their  anceflors,  who  by  the 
mod  extreme  injuftice  have  rejed:ed  their  natural 
lordjor  difpofT^flfed  thofe  who  had  been  in  the  moft 
folemn  manner  placed  in  the  government,  and  to 
whom  they  had  generally  fworn  allegiance. 

3.  If  the  next  heir  be  acflually  king,  feifed  of  the 
power  by  the  death  of  his  predeceflbr,  fo  that  there 
is  no  intermiflion  •  then  all  the  folemnities  and  re- 
ligious ceremonies,  ufed  at  the  coronations  of  their 
kings,  v/ith  the  oaths  given  and  taken,  are  the  moft 
profane  abufes  of  facred  things  in  contempt  of  God 
and  man  that  can  be  imagined,  moft  el'pecially  if 
the  ad  be  (as  our  author  calls  it)  voluntary,  and  the 

M  2  kin 


<c 


164  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

king  receiving  nothing  by  it,  be  bound  to  keep  it 
no  longer  than  he  pleafes.  The  prince  who  is  to  be 
Iworn,  might  fpare  the  pains  of  watching  all  night  in 
the  church,  fafting,  praying,  confeffing,  communi- 
cating, and  fwearing,  ''  that  he  will  to  the  utmoft 
of  his  power  defend  the  clergy,  maintain  the  union 
of  the  church,  obviate  all  excefs,  rapine,  extor- 
tion and  iniquity;  take  care  that  in  all  judgments 
"  juftice  may  be  obferved,  with  equity  and  mercy, 
"  &c.  or  of  invoking  the  affiftance  of  the  Holy 
*^  Ghoft  for  the  better  performance  of  his  oath;" 
and  without  ceremony  tell  the  nobility  and  people, 
that  he  would  do  what  he  thought  fit.  'Twere  to  as 
little  purpofe  for  the  archbifhop  of  Rheims  to  take 
the  trouble  of  faying  mafs,  delivering  to  him  the 
crown,  fcepter,  and  other  enfigns  of  royalty,  ex- 
plaining what  is  fignified  by  them,  anointing  him* 
with  the  oil  which  they  fay  was  deliver'd  by  an 
angel  to  St.  Remigius,  bleffing  him,  and  praying 
to  (rod  to  blefs  him  if  he  rightly  performed  his  oath 
to  God  and  the  people,  and  denouncing  the  contrary 
in  cafe  of  failure  on  his  part,  if  thefe  things  con- 
ferred nothing  upon  him  but  what  he  had  before, 
and  were  of  no  obligation  to  him.  Such  ludifi- 
cations  of  the  moft  facred  things  are  too  odious  and 
impious  to  be  imputed  to  nations  that  have  any  vir- 
tue, or  profefs  chriftianity.  This  cannot  fall  upon 
the  French  and  Spaniards,  who  had  certainly  a  great 
zeal  to  religion,  whatever  it  was;  and  were  fo 
eminent  for  moral  virtues  as  to  be  a  reproach  to  us, 
who  live  in  an  age  of  more  knowledge.  But  their 
meaning  is  fo  well  declared  by  their  moft  folemn  ads, 
that  none  but  thofe  who  are  wilfully  ignorant  can 
miftake.  One  of  the  councils  held  at  Toledo,  de- 
clared by  the  clergy,  nobility,  and  others  aflifting, 

'^  That 


Sed.  1 8.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      165 

■ "  That  no  man  fiiould  be  placed  in  the  royal  feat 
"  till  he  had  fworn  to  preferve  the  church,  &c*. 
Another  held  in  the  fame  place,  fignified  to  Sifinan- 
dus,  who  was  then  newly  crown'd,  "  That  if  he, 
"  or  any  of  his  fuccejQbrs  fliould,  contrary  to  their 
*'  oaths,  and  the  laws  of  their  country,  proudly  and 
**  cruelly  prefume  to  exercife  domination  over  them, 
**  he  fliould  be  excommunicated,  and  feparated  from 
*^  Chrifl-and  them  to  eternal  judgment -j-."  The 
French  laws,  and  their  beft  writers  afferting  the 
fame  things,  are  confirmed  by  perpetual  pradice. 
Henry  of  Navarre,  tho*  certainly  according  to  their 
rules,  and  in  their  efleem  a  moll  accompliflfd  prince  J, 
was  by  two  general  alTemblies  of  the  eflates  held  at 
Blois,  deprived  of  the  lucceflion  for  being  a  prote- 
flant ;  and  notwithflanding  the  greatnefs  of  his  repu- 
tation, valour,  vidlories,  and  afiability,  could  never 
be  admitted  till  he  had  made  himfelf  capable  of  the 
ceremonies  of  his  coronation,  by  conforming  to  the 
religion  which  by  the  oath  he  was  to  defend.  Nay 
this  prefent  king,  tho'  haughty  enough  by  nature, 
and  elevated  by  many  fucceffes,  has  acknowledged, 
as  he  fays,  with  joy,  that  he  can  do  nothing  contra- 
ry to  law,  and  calls  it  a  happy  impotence  -,  in  pur- 
fuance  of  v/hich,  he  has  annulled  many  ads  of  his 
father  and  grandfather,  alienating  the  demefnes  of 
the  crown,  as  things  contrary  to  law,  and  not  within 
their  power, 

Thefe  things  being  confirmed  by  all  the  good 
authors  of  that  nation,  Filmer  |]  finds  only  the  worfl 
to  be  fit  for  his  turn ;  and  neither  minding  law  nor 
hiftory,  takes  his  maxims  from  a  vile  flattering  dif- 
courfe  of  Bellay,  calculated  for  the  perfonal  intereft 
of  Henry  the  fourth  then  king  of  Navarre,  in  which 

*  Concil.  Tolet.  6.  -[•  Concil.  Tolet.  4. 

t  Hia.  Thuan.  |1  Apol.  Catliol. 

M  3  he 


cc 


166  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

he  fays,  '^  That  the  heir  apparent,  tho'  furious, 
mad,  a  fool,  vicious,  and  in  all  refped:s  abomi- 
nably wicked,  muft  be  admitted  to  the  crown." 
But  Bellay  was  fo  far  from  attaining  the  ends  defigned 
by  his  book,  that  by  fuch  dod:rines,  which  filled  all 
men  with  horror,  he  brought  great  prejudice  to  his 
mafter,  and  procured  little  favour  from  Henry, 
who  defired  rather  to  recommend  himfelf  to  his 
people  as  the  beft  man  they  could  fet  up,  than  to  im- 
pofe  a  neceility  upon  them  of  taking  him  if  he  had 
been  the  worft.  But  our  author  not  contented  with 
what  this  fycophant  fays,  in  relation  to  fuch  princes 
as  are  placed  in  the  government  by  a  law  eftablifhing 
the  fucceffion  by  inheritance,  with  an  impudence 
peculiar  to  himfelf,  afferts  the  fame  right  to  be  in 
any  m.an,  who  by  any  means  gets  into  power  3  and 
impofes  the  fame  neceflity  of  obedience  upon  the 
fubjed:  where  there  is  no  law,  as  Bellay  does  by  vir- 
tue of  one  that  is  eftablifhed. 

4.  In  the  lafi:  place  :  as  Bellay  acknowledges  that 
the  right  belongs  to  princes  only  where  'tis  eftablifhed 
by  law,  I  deny  that  there  is,  was,  or  ever  can  be 
any  fuch.  No  people  is  known  to  have  been  fo 
mad  or  wicked,  as  by  their  own  confent,  for  their 
own  good,  and  for  the  obtaining  of  juftice,  to  give 
the  power  to  beafls,  under  whom  it  could  never  be 
obtain'd  :  or  if  we  could  believe  that  any  had  been 
guilty  of  an  adl  fo  full  of  folly,  turpitude  and 
wickednefs,  it  could  not  have  the  force  of  a  law,  and 
could  never  be  put  in  execution  ;  for  tho'  the  rules, 
by  which  the  proximity  fhouid  be  judged,  be  never 
fo  precife,  it  will  ft  ill  be  doubted  whofe  cafe  fuits 
beft  with  them.  Tho'  the  law  in  fome  places  gives 
private  inheritances  to  the  next  heir,  and  in  others 
makes  allotments  according  tofeveral  proportions,  no 
one  knows  to  whom,  or  how  far  the  benefit  fhall 

accrue 


Sedl.  iS.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     167 

accrue  to  any  man,  till  it  be  adjudged  by  a  power  to 
which  the  parties  muft  fubmit.  Contefts  will  in 
the  like  manner  arife  concerning  fucceflions  to 
crowns,  how  exadlly  foever  they  be  difpofed  by  law : 
for  tho'  every  one  will  fay  that  the  next  ought  to 
fucceed,  yet  no  man  knows  who  is  the  next ;  which 
is  too  much  verified  by  the  bloody  decifions  of  fuch 
difputes  in  many  parts  of  the  world  :  and  he  that 
fays  the  next  in  blood  is  adually  king,  makes  all 
queftions  thereupon  arifing  impoffible  to  be  other- 
wife  determined  than  by  the  fword ;  the  pretender 
to  the  right  being  placed  above  the  judgment  of 
man,  and  the  fubjecfts  (for  any  thing  I  knov/)  obliged 
to  believe,  ferve  and  obey  him,  if  he  fays  he  has  it. 
For  otherwife,  if  either  every  man  in  particular,  or 
all  together  have  a  right  of  judging  his  title,  it  can 
be  of  no  value  till  it  be  adjudged. 

I  confefs  that  the  law  of  France  by  the  utter 
exclufion  of  females^ and  their  defcendants,  does 
obviate  many  dangerous  and  inextricable  difficulties; 
but  others  remain  which  are  fufficient  to  fubvert  all 
the  polity  of  that  kingdom,  if  there  be  not  a  power 
of  judging  them  -,  and  there  can  be  none  if  it  be  true 
that  "  Le  mort  faifit  le  vif "  Not  to  trouble  my 
felf  with  feigned  cafes,  that  of  legitimation  alone 
will  fuffice.  'Tis  not  enough  to  fay  that  the  children 
born  under  marriage  are  to  be  reputed  legitimate  ; 
for  not  only  feveral  children  born  of  Joan  daughter 
to  the  king  of  Portugal,  wife  to  Henry  the  fourth 
ofCaftille,  during  the  time  of  their  marriage,  were 
utterly  rejedted,  as  begotten  in  adultery,  but  alfo  her 
daughter  Joan,  whom  the  king  during  his  life,  and 
at  the  hour  of  his  death  acknowledged  to  have  been 
begotten  by  him ;  and  the  only  title  that  Ifabel,  who 
was  married  to  Ferdinand  of  Arragon,  had  to  the 
crown  of  Soain,  was  derived  from  their  rejection. 

M  4  It 


i6S  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

li  Vv^ould  be  tedious,  and  might  give  offence  to  many 
great  peribns^  if  I  ihould  relate  all  the  dubious  cafes, 
that  have  been,  or  flill  remain  in  the.  world,  touching 
matters  of  this  nature  :-  but  the  lawyers  of  all  nati- 
ons will  teilify,  that  hardly  any  one  point  comes 
before  them,  which  affords  a  greater  numxber  of  dif- 
ficult cafes,  than  that  of  marriages,  and  the  ligiti- 
mation  of  children  upon  them  ;  arid  nations  muft 
be  involved  in  the  molt  inextricable  difficulties,  if 
there  be  not  a  power  fomewhere  to  decide  them ; 
which  cannot  be,  if  there  be  no  intermiffion,  and 
that  the  next  in  blood  (that  is,  he  who  fays  he  is 
the  next)  be  imm.ediately  inverted  with  the  right  and 
power.  But  farely  no  people  has  been  fo  carelefs  of 
their  mofl:  important  concernments,  to  leave  them 
in  fuch  uncertainty,  and  fimply  to  depend  upon  the 
humour  of  a  m.an,  or  the  faith  of  women,  who 
befides  their  other  frailties,  have  been  often  accufed 
of  fuppofitltious  births:  and  mens  paflions  are  known 
to  be  fo  violent  in  relation  to  w^omen  they  love  or 
hate,  that  none  can  fafely  be  trufced  with  thofe 
judgments.  The  virtue  of  the  beft  Vv^ould  be  ex- 
pofed  to  a  temptation,  that  fielli  and  blood  can  hardly 
refiil: ;  and  fuch  as  are  lefs  perfedb  would  follow  no 
other  rule  than  the  blind  impulfe  of  the  paffion  that 
for  the  prcfent  reigns  in  them.  There  muft  there- 
fore be  a  judge  of  fuch  difputes  as  may  in  thefe  cafes 
arife  in  every  kingdom  -,  and  tho'  'tis  not  my  buii* 
nefsto  determine  who  is  that  judge  in  all  places,  yet 
I  may  juftly  fay,  that  in  England  it  is  the  parliament. 
If  no  inferior  authority  could  debar  Ignotus  fon  to 
the  lady  Roffe,  born  under  the  protedion,  from  the 
inheritance  of  a  private  family,  none  can  certainly 
affame  a  power  of  difpoiing  of  the  crown  upon  any 
occafion.  No  authority  but  that  of  the  parliament 
could  legitimate  the  children  of  Catherine  Swinford, 

with 


Seft.  1 8.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      169 

with  a  provifo,  not  to  extend  to  the  inheritance  of 
the  crown.     Others  might  fay,  if  they  were  law- 
fully begotten,  they  ought  to  inherit  every  thing,  and 
nothing  if  they  were  not :  but  the  parliament  knew 
how  to  limit  a  particular  favour,  and  prevent  it  from 
extending  to  a  public  mifchief     Henry  the  eighth 
took  an  expeditious  v^^ay  of  obviating  part  of  the  con- 
troverlies  that  might  arife  from  the  multitude  of  his 
wives,  by  cutting  off  the  heads  of  fom.e  as  foon  as 
he   was  weary  of  them,  or  had  a  mind  to  take 
another  ;  but  having  been  hindered  from  dealing  in 
the  fame  manner  with  Catherine  by  the  greatnefs  of 
her  birth  and  kindred,  he  left  fuch  as  the  parliament 
only  could  refolve.     And  no  lefs  power  would  ever 
have  thought  of  making  Mary  and  Elizabeth  capable 
of  the  fucceifion,  when,  according  to  ordinary  rules, 
one  of  them  muft  have  been  a  baftard  -,  and  it  had 
been  abfurd  to  fay,  that  both  of  them  wxre  imm.e- 
diately  upon  the  death  of  their  predeceffors  pofiefs'd 
of  the  crown,  if  an  afl:  of  parliament  had  not  con- 
ferred the  right  upon  them,  which  they  could  not 
have  by  birth.    But  the  kings  and  princes  of  England 
have  not  been  of  a  temper  different  from  thofe  of 
other  nations  :  and  many  examples  may  be  brought 
of  the  like  occafions  of  difpute  happening  every 
where  ;    and  the  like   will  probably  be  for  ever  ; 
which  muft   neceifarily   introduce  the  moft   mif- 
chievous   confufions,  and  expofe  the  titPs  which 
(as  is  pretended)  are  to  be  efteemed  moft  facred,  to 
be  overthrown  by  violence  and  fraud,  if  there   be 
not  in  all  places  a  pov/er  of  deciding  the  controver- 
lies  that  arife  from  the  uncertainty  of  titles,  accord- 
ing to  the  refpedive  law^s  of  every  nation,  upon  which 
they  are  grounded  :  no  man  can  be  thought  to  have 
a  juft  title,  till  it  be  (o  adjudged  by  that  powxr : 
this  judgment  is  the  firft  ftep  to  the  throne  :    the 

oath 


170  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

oath  taken  by  the  king  obliges  him  to  obferve  the 
laws  of  his  country ;  and  that  concerning  the  fuc- 
ceffion  being  one  of  the  principal,  he  is  obliged  ^  to 
keep  that  part  as  well  as  any  other. 

SECT.     XIX. 

T^he  greatefl  enemy  of  a  jiijl  magtjlrate  is  he  who 
endeavours  to  invalidate  the  contradi  between  him 
and  the  people^  or  to  corrupt  their  mantiers. 

5^  I  ^IS  not  only  from  religion,  but  from  the  law 
I  of  nature,  that  we  learn  the  neceflity  of 
{landing  to  the  agreements  we  make  ;  and  he  who 
departs  from  the  principle  written  in  the  hearts  of 
men  paclis  ftandum,  feems  10  degenerate  into  a  beaft. 
Such  as  had  virtue,  tho' w^ithout  true  religion,  could 
tell  us  (as  a  brave  and  excellent  Grecian  did)  that  it 
was  not  necelTary  for  him  to  live^  but  it  was  necef- 
fary  to  preferve  his  heart  from  deceit,  and  his  tongue 
from  falfhood.  The  Roman  fatyrift  carries  the  fame 
notion  to  a  great  height,  and  affirms,  that  *  "  tho* 
"  the  worft  of  tyrants  fhould  com.mand  a  man  to 
"  be  falfe  and  perjur'd,  and  back  his  Injundlion  with 
"  the  utmoft  of  torments,  he  ought  to  prefer  his  in- 
*'  tegrity  before  his  life  "  And  tho'  Filmer  may  be 
excufed  if  he  often  miftake  in  matters  of  theology; 
yet  his  inclinations  to  Rome  which  he  prefers  before 
Geneva,  might  have  led  him  to  the  principles  in 
which  the  honeft  Romans  lived,  if  he  had  not  ob- 
ferved  that  fuch  principles  as  make  men  honeft  and 
generous,  do  alfo  make  them  lovers  of  liberty,  and 
conftant  in  the  defence  of  their  country  :  which  fa- 
vouring too  much  of  a  republican  fpirit,  he  prefers 


* 


-Phalaris  licet  imperet  ut  fis 
Falfus,  &  admoto  didet  perjuria  tauro, 
Suinnium  crede  nefiis  animam  prseferre  pudori.     Juuenal. 

the 


Sea.  19-   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      171 

the  morals  of  that  city,  fince  they  are  become  more 
refined  by  the  pious  and  charitable  Jefuits,  before 
thofe  that  were  remarkable  in  themi,  as  long  as  they 
retained  any  fhadow  of  their  antient  integrity,  which 
admitted  of  no  equivocations  and  detefted  prevarica- 
tions ;  by  that  means  preferving  innocence  in  the 
hearts  of  private  men  for  their  inward  contentment, 
and  in  civil  focieties  for  the  public  good ;  which  if 
once  extinguifli'd,  mankind  muft  neceflarily  fall  in- 
to the  condition  Hobbes  rightly  calls  *'  bellum  om- 
''  nium  contra  omnes,"  wherein  no  man  can  pro- 
mife  to  himfelf  any  other  wife,  children  or  goods, 
than  he  can  procure  by  his  own  fword. 

Some  may  perhaps  think  that  the  endeavours  of 
our  author  to  introduce  fuch  accurfed  principles,  as 
tend  to  the  ruin  of  mankind,  proceed  from  his  ig- 
norance. But  tho'  he  appears  to  have  had  a  great 
meafure  of  that  quality,  I  fear  the  evil  proceeds 
from  a  deeper  root  3  and  that  he  attempts  to  pro- 
mote the  interefts  of  ill  magiftrates,  who  make  it 
their  bufinefs  to  deftroy  all  good  principles  in  the 
people,  with  as  much  induftry  as  the  good  endea- 
vour to  preferve  them  where  they  are,  and  teach 
them  where  they  are  wanting.  Reafon  and  expe- 
rience inilrudl  us,  that  every  man  ad:s  according  to 
the  end  he  propofes  to  himfelf.  The  good  magif- 
trate  feeks  the  good  of  the  people  committed  to  his 
care,  that  he  may  perform  the  end  of  his  inftitution : 
and  knowing  that  chiefly  to  ccnfift  in  juftice  and 
virtue,  he  endeavours  to  plant  and  propagate  them  ;  • 
and  by  doing  this  he  procures  his  own  good  as  wxU 
as  that  of  the  public.  He  knows  there  is  no  fafety 
where  there  is  no  flrength,  noflrength  without  union, 
no  union  without  juftice;  no  juftice  where  faitii 
and  truth,  in  accompli (hing  public  and  private  con- 
trafts,  is  wanting.     This  he  perpetually  inculcates, 

and 


172  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HI. 

^nd  thinks  it  a  great  part  of  his  duty,  by  precept 
and  example,  to  educate  the  youth  in  a  love  of  vir- 
tue and  truth,  that  they  may  be  feafoned  with  them, 
and  fxlled  with  an  abhorrence  of  vice  and  falfliood, 
before  they  attain  that  age  which  is  expofcd  to  the 
moft  violent  temptations,  and  in  which  they  may 
by  their  crimes  bring  the  greateft  mifchiefs  upon  the 
public.  He  would  do  all  this,  tho'  it  were  to  his  own 
prejudice.  But  as  good  adions  always  carry  a  reward 
with  them,  thefe  contribute  in  a  high  meafure  to 
his  advantage.  By  preferring  the  intereft  of  the 
people  before  his  own,  he  gains  their  affection,  and 
all  that  is  in  their  power  comes  w  ith  it ;  whilft  he 
unites  them  to  one  another,  he  unites  all  to  himfelf : 
in  leading  them  to  virtue,  he  increafes  their  ftrength, 
and  by  that  means  provides  for  his  own  fafety^  glo- 
ry and  power. 

On  the  other  fide,  fuch  as  feek  different  ends  muft 
take  different  ways.  When  a  magiflrate  fancies  he 
is  not  made  for  the  people,  but  the  people  for  him  -, 
that  he  does  not  govern  for  them,  but  tor  himfelf; 
and  that  the  people  live  only  to  increafe  his  glory, 
or  furnilli  matter  for  his  pleafures,  he  does  not  in- 
quire what  he  may  do  for  them,  but  what  he  may 
draw  from  them..  By  this  means  he  fets  up  an  in- 
tereft of  profit,  pleafure  or  pomp  in  himfelf,  repug- 
nant to  the  good  of  the  public  for  which  he  is  made 
to  be  what  he  is.  Thefe  contrary  ends  certainly  di- 
vide the  nation  into  parties ;  and  whilft  every  one 
endeavours  to  advance  that  to  which  he  is  addifted, 
occafions  of  hatred  for  injuries  every  day  done,  or 
thought  to  be  done  and  received,  muft  neceifarily 
arife.  This  creates  a  moft  fierce  and  irreconcileable 
enmity,  becaufe  the  occafions  are  frequent,  impor- 
tant and  univerfal,  and  the  caufes  thought  to  be 
moft  juft.     The  people  think  it  the  greateft  of  all 

2  crimes^ 


Sea.  19.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     173 

crimes,  to  convert  that  power  to  their  hurt,  which 
was  inftituted  for  their  good  ;  and  that  the  injuftice 
is  aggravated  by  perjury  and  ingratitude,    which 
comprehend  all  manner  of  ill  -,  and  the  magiftrate 
gives  the  name  of  fedition  or  rebellion  to  whatfoe- 
ver  they  do  for  the  prefervation  of  themfelves  and 
their  own  rights.     When  men  s  fpirits  are  thus  pre- 
pared, a  fmall  matter  fets  them  on  fire ;  but  if  no 
accident  happen  to  blow  them  into  a  flame,    the 
courfe  of  jufiice  is  certainly  interrupted,  the  public 
affairs  are  negleded  5  and  when  any  occafion  whether 
foreign  or  domeftic  arifes,  in  which  the  magiflrate 
ftands  in  need  of  the  peoples  afli fiance,  they,  whofe 
affedtions  are  alienated,  not  only  fliew  an  unwill- 
ingnefs  to  ferve  him  with  their  perfons  and  edates, 
but  fear  that  by  delivering  him  from  his  diftrefs  they 
ftrengthen  their  enemy,  and  enable  him  to  opprefs 
them :  and  he  fancying  his  will  to  be  unjuftly  of;  /It 
pofed,  or  his  due  more  unjuftly  denied,    is  filled 
with  a  diflike  of  w^hat  he  fees,  and  a  fear  of  worfe 
for  the  future.     Whilft  he  endeavours  to  eafe  him- 
felf  of  the  one,  and  to  provide  againfl  the  other,  he 
ufually  increafes  the  evils  of  both,  andjealoufies  are 
on  both  fides  multiplied.     Every  man  knows  that 
the  governed  are  in  a  great  meafure  under  the  power 
of  the  governor  ;  but  as  no  man,  or  number  of  men, 
is:  willingly  fubjefl:  to  thofe  who  feek  their  ruin,  fuch 
as  fall  into  fo  great  a  misfortune,  continue  no  long- 
er under  it  than  force,  fear,  or  neceflity  may  be  able 
to  oblige  them.     But  as  fuch  a  neceflity  can  hard- 
ly lie  longer  upon  a  great  people,  than  till  the  evil 
be  fully  difcovered  and  comprehended,  and  their 
virtue,  ftrength  and  power  be  united  toexfclit; 
the  ill  magiftrate  looks  upon  all  things  that  may 
conduce  to  that  end,  as  fo  many  preparatives  to  his 
ruin  3  and  by  the  help  of  thofe  who  are  of  his  party, 

will 


1 74  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HL 

will  endeavour  to  prevent  that  union,  and  diminiih 
tiiat  ftrength,  virtue,  power  and  courage,  which  he 
knows  to  be  bent  againft  him.  And  as  truth,  faith- 
ful dealing,  due  performance  of  contracts,  and  in- 
tegrity of  manners,  are  bonds  of  union,  and  helps 
to  good,  he  will  always  by  tricks,  artifices,  cavils, 
and  all  means  poffible  endeavour  to  eftablifli  falf- 
hood  and  diflionefly ;  whilft  other  emifTaries  and 
inftruments  of  iniquity,  by  corrupting  the  youth, 
and  feducing  fuch  as  can  be  brought  to  lewdnefs 
and  debauchery,  bring  the  people  to  fuch  a  pafs, 
that  they  may  neither  care  nor  dare  to  vindicate 
their  rights,  and  that  thofe  who  would  do  it,  may 
fo  far  fufpe6l  each  other,  as  not  to  confer  upon, 
much  lefs  to  join  in  any  adion  tending  to  the  public 
deliverance. 

This  diflinguifhes  the  good  from  the  bad  magif- 
(t  rate,  the  faithful  from  the  unfaithful ;  and  thofe 
who  adhere  to  either,  living  in  the  fame  principle, 
muft  walk  in  the  fame  ways.  They  who  uphold 
the  rightful  power  of  a  juft  magiftracy,  encourage 
virtue  and  juftice,  teach  men  what  they  ought  to 
do,  fuffer,  or  exped;  from  others ;  fix  them  upon 
principles  of  honefty,  and  generally  advance  every 
thing  that  tends  to  the  increafe  of  the  valour, 
ftrength,  greatnefs  and  happincfs  of  the  nation,  cre- 
ating a  good  union  among  them,  and  bringing  every 
man  to  an  exadt  underftanding  of  his  own  and  the 
public  rights.  On  the  other  fide,  he  that  would 
introduce  an  ill  magiftrate ;  make  one  evil  who  was 
good,  or  preferve  him  in  the  exercife  of  injuftice 
when  he  is  corrupted,  muft  always  open  the  way 
for  him  by  vitiating  the  people,  corrupting  their 
manners,  deftroying  the  validity  of  oaths  and  con- 
tracts, teaching  fuch  evafions,  equivocations  and' 
frauds,  as  are  inconfiftent  with  the  thoughts  that 

2  become 


Sea.  19.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     iy3 

become  men  of  virtue  and  courage  5  and  overthrow- 
ing the  confidence  they  ought  to  have  in  each  other, 
make  it  impoffible  for  them  to  unite  among  them- 
felves.     The  Hke  arts  muft  be  ufcd  v^'ith  the  magif- 
trate:  he  cannot  be  for  their  turn,  till  he  is  perfuad- 
ed  to  believe  he  has  no  dependance  upon,  and  owes 
no  duty  to  the  people  3  that  he   is  of  himfelf,  and 
not  by  their  inftitution  ;  that  no  man  ought  to  in- 
quire into,  nor  be  judge  of  his  actions ;    that  all 
obedience  is  due  to  him,  whether  he  be  good  or  bad, 
wife  or  foolifli,  a  father  or  enemy  to  his  country. 
This  being  calculated  for  his  perfonal  intereft,  he 
muft  purfue  the  fame  deligns,  or  his  kingdom  is  di- 
vided within  itfelf,    and   cannot  fubiift.     By  this 
means  thofe  who  flatter  his  humour,    come  to  be 
accounted  his  friends,    and  the  only  men  that  are 
thought  worthy  of  great  trufts,  whilft  luch  as  are  of 
another  mind  are  expofed  to  all  perfecution.     Thefe    ') 
are  always  fuch  as  excel  in  virtue,    wifdom,  and 
greatnefs  of  fpirit ;    they  have  eyes,  and  they  will 
always  fee  the  way  they  go  3  and  leaving  fools  to  be 
guided  by  implicit  faith,  will  diftinguiih   between 
good  and  evil,  and  choofe  that  which  is  beft;  they 
will  judge  of  men  by  their  adions,  and  by  them  dif- 
covering  whofe  fervant  every  man  is,  know  whether 
he  is  to  be  obeyed  or  not.   Thofe  who  are  ignorant  of 
all  good,  careleis  or  enemies  to  it,  take  a  more  com- 
pendious way ;  their  flavifli,  vicious  and  bafe  natures 
inclining  them  to  feek  only  private  and  prefent  ad- 
vantages, they  eafily  flide  into  a  blind  dependance 
upon  one  who  has  wealth  and  power  -,  and  defiring 
only  to  know  his  wilf  care  not  what  injuftice  they 
do,  if  they  may  be  rewarded.     They  worfliip  what 
they  find  in  the  temple,  tho'  it  be  the  vileft  of  idols, 
and  always  like  that  beft  which  is  worft,  becaufe  it 
agrees  with  their  inclinations  and  principles.  When 

a 


iy6  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

a  party  comes  to  be  ereded  upon  fuch  a  foundation, 
debauchery, '  lewdnefs  and  diilionefl)^  are  the  true 
badges  of  it.  Such  as  Vv'ear  them  are  cheriflied  5 
but  the  principal  marks  of  favour  are  referved  for 
thofe  who  are  the  moft  induilrious  in  mifchief, 
either  by  feducing  the  people  with  the  allurements  of 
fenfual  pleafures,  or  corrupting  their  underftandings 
by  falie  and  flavifh  dodrines.  By  this  means  a 
man  who  calls  himfelf  a  philofopher  or  a  divine,  is 
often  more  ufeful  than  a  great  number  of  tapfters, 
cooks,  buffoons,  players,  fidlers,  whores  or  bawds. 
Thefe  are  the  devil's  minifters  of  a  lower  order ; 
they  feduce  fingle  perfons,  and  fuch  as  fall  into  their 
fnares  are  for  the  moft  part  of  the  fimpler  fort :  but 
the  principal  fupporters  of  his  kingdom,  are  they, 
who  by  falfe  dodrines  poifon  the  fprings  of  religion 
and  virtue,  and  by  preaching  or  writing  (if  their 
falfliood  and  wickednefs  v/ere  not  deteded)  would 
extinguifti  all  principles  of  common  honefty,  and 
bring;  whole  nations  to  be  beft  fatisfied  with  them- 
felves,  when  their  adions  are  moft  abominable. 
And  as  the  means  muft  always  be  fuitable  to  the  end 
propofed,  the  governments  that  are  to  be  efta* 
bliihed  or  fupported  by  fuch  ways  muft  needs 
be  the  worft  of  all,  and  comprehend  all  manner  of 
evil. 

SECT.      XX. 

XJnjii/l  commands  are  not  to  be  cbeyd ;  and  no  man 
is  obliged  to  fiiffer  for  not  obeying  fuch  as  are  againjt 
law, 

N  the  next  place  cur  author  gravely  propofes  a 
queftion,  **  Whether  it  be  a  fm  to  diiobcy   the 
king,  if  he  command  any  thing  contrary  to  law  ?" 
and  as  gravely  determines,  ''  that  not  only  in  human 

"  laws. 


^ 


(C 

<< 

cc 

(C 

cc 
(< 
<c 


Sea,  20.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      1 7  7 

laws,  but  even  in  divine,  a  thing  may  be  com- 
manded contrary  to  law,  and  yet  obedience  to 
fuch  a  command  is  necefTary.  The  fandlifying  of 
the  fabbath  is  a  divine  law,  yet  if  a  mailer  com 
mand  his  fervant  not  to  go  to  church  upon  a  fab- 
bath day,  the  beft  divines  teach  us,  the  fervant 
mufl:  obey,  &c.  It  is  not  fit  to  tie  the  mailer  to 
acquaint  the  fervant  with  his  fecret  counfel."  Tho* 
he  frequently  contradicts  in  one  line  what  he  fays  in 
another,  this  whole  claufe  is  uniform  and  fuitable 
to  the  main  defign  of  his  book.  He  fets  up  the 
authority  of  man  in  oppolition  to  the  command  of 
God,  gives  it  the  preference,  and  fays,  the  beft 
divines  inftrud:  us  fo  to  do.  St.  Paul  then  muft  have 
been  one  of  the  worft,  for  he  knew  that  the  powers 
under  which  he  lived,  had  under  thefevereft  penalties 
forbidden  the  publication  of  the  gofpel ;  and  yet  he 
fays,  "  Wo  to  me  if  I  preach  it  not."  St.  Peter  was 
no  better  than  he,  for  he  tells  us,  "  That  it  is  better 
"  to  obey  God  than  man:"  and  they  could  not  fpeak 
other  wife,  unlefs  they  had  forgotten  the  words  of 
their  mafter,  who  told  them,  *'  They  fhould  not 
*'  fear  them  that  could  only  kill  the  body,  but  him 
'^  who  could  kill  and  caft  into  hell."  And  if  I 
muft  not  fear  him  that  can  only  kill  the  body,  not 
only  the  reafon,  but  all  excufe  for  obeying  him  is 
taken  away. 

To  prove  what  he  fays,  he  cites  a  pertinent  ex- 
ample from  St.  Luke*,  and  very  logically  concludes, 
that  becaufe  Chrift  reproved  the  hypocrify  of  the 
Pharifees,  (who  generally  adhered  to  the  external  and 
circumftantial  part  of  the  law,  neglecting  the  effential, 
and  taking  upon  themfelves  to  be  the  interpreters  of 
that  which  they  did  not  underftand)  the  law'of  God 
IS  not  to  be  obeyed :  and  as  ftrongly  proves,  that 

*  Chap,  xlv. 

..  Vol,  IL  N  becaufe 


178  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

becaufe  Chrift  fliewed  them  that  the  fame  law,  which 
by  their  own  confeflion  permitted  them  to  pull  an  afs 
oat  of  a  pit  on  the  fabbath  day,  could  not  but  give 
a  liberty  of  healing  the  lick,  therefore  the  comm.ands 
of  kings  are  to  be  obeyed,  tho'  they  fhould  be  con- 
trary to  human  and  divine  laws.  But  if  perverfenefs 
had  not  blinded  him,  he  might  have  feen,  that  this 
very  text  is  wholly  again!  l  his  purpofe;  for  the  ma- 
giftratical  power  was  on  the  fide  of  the  Pharifees, 
otherwife  they  would  not  have  fought  an  occafion  to 
enfnare  him  -,  and  that  power  having  perverted  the 
law  of  God  by  falfe  gloffes,  and  a  fuperindud:ion  of 
human  traditions,  prohibited  the  moft  neceffary  afts 
of  charity  to  be  done  on  the  fabbath  day,  which 
Chrift  reproved,  and  reftored  the  lick  man  to  his  health 
in  their  fight. 

But  I  could  wifh  our  author  had  told  us  the  names 
of  thofe  divines,  who,  he  fays,  are  the  beft,  and 
who  pretend  to  teach  us  thefe  fine  things.  I  know 
fome  who  are  thought  good,  that  are  of  a  contrary 
opinion,  and  lay  that  God  having  required  that  day 
to  be  fct  apart  for  his  fervice  and  worfliip,  man  can- 
not difpenfe  with  the  obligation,  unlefs  he  can  abro- 
gate the  law  of  God.  Perhaps,  for  want  of  other 
arguments  to  prove  the  contrary,  I  may  be  told,  that 
this  favours  too  much  of  Puritanifm  and  Calvinifm. 
But  I  fl:iall  take  the  reproach,  till  fome  better  patrons 
than  Laud  and  his  creatures  may  be  found  for  the  ^^ 
other  opinion.  By  the  advice  and  iniligation  of  |l 
thefe  men,  from  about  the  year  1630,  to  1640,  1) 
fports  and  revelings,  which  ended  for  the  moft  part 
in  drunkennefs  and  lewdnefs,  wxre  not  only  permitted  "t 
on  that  day,  but  enjoined.  And  tho'  this  did  ad-  '* 
vancc  human  authority  in  derogation  to  the  divine, 
to  a  degree  that  may  pleafe  fuch  as  are  of  our  author's 
mind,  yet  others  reiblving  rather  to  obey  the   laws 

of 


I 


J 


sea.  20.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,      ipg 

of  God  than  the  commands  of  men,  could  not  be 
brought  to  pafs  the  Lord's  day  in  that  manner^ 
Since  that  time  no  man  except  Filmer  and  Heylin 
has  been  To  wicked  to  conceive,  or  fo  impu-^ 
dent  to  ailert  fuch  brutal  abfurdities.  But  leaving 
the  farther  coniideration  of  the  original  of  thisabufe, 
I  deiire  to  know,  whether  the  authority  given  to 
mafters  to  command  things  contrary  to  the  law  of 
God,  be  peculiar  in  relation  to  the  fabbath,  or  to  a 
few  other  points,  or  ought  generally  to  extend  to  all 
God's  laws ;  and  whether  he  who  may  command  his 
fervant  to  a6t  contrary  to  the  law  of  God,  have  not 
a  right  in  himfelf  of  doing  the  fame  ?  If  peculiar, 
fome  authority  or  precept  muft  be  produced,  by 
which  it  may  appear  that  God  has  flighted  his  ordi- 
nance concernino;  that  day,  and'  fufl^er'd  it  to  be 
jcontemned,  whilft  he  exadls  obedience  to  all  others. 
If  we  have  a  liberty  left  to  us  of  flighting  others  alfo^ 
•jmore  or  lefs  in  number,  we  ought  to  know  how 
-many,  w^hat  they  are,  and  how  it  comes  to  pafs,  that 
ibme  are  of  obligation  and  others  not.  If  the  empire 
-of  the  world  is  not  only  divided  between  God  and 
.Caefar,  but  every  man  alio  who  can  give  five  pounds 
-a  year  to  a  fervant,  has  (o  great  a  part  in  it,  that  in 
•fome  cafes  his  commands  are  to  be  obeyed  preferably 
lo  thofc  of  God,  it  v/ere  fit  to  know  the  limits  of 
each  kirigdom^  lefl:  v/e  happen  prepofteroufly  to  obey 
man  when  we  ought  to  obey  God,  or  God  whea 
nve  are  to  follow  the  commands  of  men.  If  it  be 
general,  the  law  of  God  is  of  no  efted:,  and  we 
may  fafely  put  an  end  to  all  thoughts  and  difcourfes 
of  religion  :  the  word  of  God  is  nothing  to  us  ^  we 
are  not  to  enquire  what  he  has  commanded,  but  what 
pleafes  our  maflier,  how  infolent,  fooliili,  vile  or 
wicked  foever  he  may  be.  The  apoftlesand  prophets, 
who  d'rtd  for  preferring  the  commands  of  God  be- 

N  2  fore 


iSo  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IH. 

fore  thofe  of  men,  fell  like  fools,  and  perijfhed  in 
their  fins.  But  if  every  particular  man  that  has  a 
fervant,  can  exempt  him  from  the  commands 
of  God,  he  may  alfo  exempt  himfelf,  and  the 
laws  of  God  are  at  once  abrogated  throughout  the 
world. 

'Tis  a  folly  to  fay  there  is  a  paffive,  as  well  as  an 
active  obedience,  and  that  he  who  will  not  do  what 
his  mafter  commands  ought  to  fuffer  the  punifhment 
he  inflicts:  for  if  the  mafter  has  a  right  of  com- 
manding, there  is  a  duty  incumbent  on  the  fervant 
of  obeying.  He  that  fuffers  for  not  doing  that  which 
he  ought  to  do,  draws  upon  himfelf  both  the  guilt 
and  the  puniiliment.  But  no  one  can  be  obliged 
to  fufter  for  that  which  he  ought  not  to  do,  becaufe 
he  who  pretends  to  command,  has  not  fo  far  an 
authority.  However,  our  queftion  is,  whether  the 
fervant,  fliould  forbear  to  do  that  which  God  com- 
mands, rather  than  whether  the  mafter  ihould  put 
away  or  beat  him  if  he  do  not  :  for  if  the  fervant 
ought  to  obey  his  mafter  rather  than  God,  as  our 
author  fays  the  heft  divines  allert,  he  fins  in  difobey- 
ing,  and  that  guilt  cannot  be  expiated  by  his  fuifering. 
If  it  be  thought  I  carry  this  point  to  an  undue  ex- 
tremity, the  limits  ought  to  be  demonftrated,  by 
which  it  may  appear  that  I  exceed  them,  tho'  the 
nature  of  the  cafe  cannot  be  altered:  for  if  the  law 
of  God  may  not  be  abrogated  by  the  commands  of 
men,  a  fervant  cannot  be  exempted  from  keeping  the 
fabbath  according  to  the  ordinance  of  God,  at  the 
will  of  his  mafter.  But  if  a  power  be  given  to  man 
at  his  pleafure  to  annul  the  laws  of  God,  the  apoftles 
ought  not  to  have  preached,  when  they  were  for- 
bidden by  the  powers  to  which  they  were  fubjed: : 
the  tortures,  and  deaths  they  fuiFer'd   for  not  obey- 


Sea.  20.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      i8r 

ing  that  command  were  in  their  own  wrong,  and 
their  blood  was  upon  their  own  heads. 

His  fecond  inftance  concerning  wars,  in  which 
he  fays  the  fubjedl  is  not  to  examine  whether  they 
are  juft  or  unjuft,  but  muft  obey,  is  weak  and 
frivolous,  and  very  often  fahe^  whereas  confe- 
quences  can  rightly  be  drawn  from  fuch  things  on- 
ly as  are  certainly  and  univerfally  true.  Tho'  God 
may  be  merciful  to  a  foldier,  who  by  the  wicked - 
nefs  of  a  magiftrate  whom  he  honeftly  trufts,  is 
made  a  minifter  of  injuflice,  *tis  nothing  to  this  cafe. 
For  if  our  author  fay  true,  that  the  word  of  a  kirij>; 
can  juftify  him  in  going  againft  the  command  of 
God,  he  muft  do  what  is  commanded  tho'  he  think  it 
evil :  the  Chriftian  foldiers  under  the  Pagan  emperors 
were  obliged  to  deftroy  their  brethren,  and  the  beft 
men  in  the  world  for  being  fo  :  fuch  as  now  live  un- 
der the  Turk  have  the  fame  obligation  upon  them  of 
defending  their  mafter,  and  flaughtering  thofe  he  re- 
putes his  enemies  for  adhering  to  Chriftianity :  and 
the  king  of  France  may  when  he  pleafes,  arm  one 
part  of  his  proteftant  fubjedls  to  the  deftrudtion  of 
the  other  -,  which  is  a  Godly  dodlrine,  and  worthy 
our  author's  invention. 

But  if  this  be  fo,  I  know  not  how  the  Ifraelites 
can  be  faid  to  have  fmned  in  following  the  examples 
of  Jeroboam,  Omri,  Ahab,  or  other  wicked  kings  : 
they  could  not  have  finned  in  obeying,  if  it  had  been 
a  fin  to  difobey  their  commands ;  and  God  would 
not  have  puniflied  them  fo  feverely,  if  they  had 
not  finned.  'Tis  impertinent  to  fay  they  were  obliged 
to  ferve  their  kings  in  unjuft  wars,  but  not  to  ferve 
idols ;  for  tho'  God  be  jealous  of  his  glory,  yet  he 
forbids  rapine  and  murder  as  well  as  idolatry.  If 
there  be  a  law  that  forbids  the  fubjeft  to  examine 
tlie  commands  tending  to  the  one,  it  cannot  but  en- 

N  3  join 


j$2  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

join  obedience  to  the  other.  The  fame  authority 
which  juftifies  murder,  takes  away  the  guilt  of  ido- 
latry ^  and  the  wretches,  both  judges  and  witneffes, 
who  put  Naboth  to  death,  could  as  little  alledge 
ignorance,  as  thofe  that  worfliipped  Jeroboam's 
calves ;  the  fame  light  of  nature  by  which  they 
fhould  have  known,  that  a  ridiculous  image  was  not 
to  be  adored  as  God,  inflrucfting  them  alfo,  that  an 
innocent  m.an  ought  not  under  pretence  of  law  to  be 
ipurdered  by  perjury, 

SECT.      XXI. 

Jt  ccnnot  befo?-  the  good  of  the  people  that  the  ma^ 
gijlrate  have  a powtr  above  the  law :  a?id  he  is  net 
a  magiflro.te  ivho  has  not  his  powe?-  by  law, 

/"T^HAT  we  may  not  be  difpleafed,  or  think  It 
I  dangerous  and  flavifli  to  depend  upon  the 
will  of  a  man,  which  perhaps  may  be  irregular  oi* 
extravagant  in  one  who  is  fubje(5l  to  no  law,  our 
author  very  dextroufly  removes  the  fcruples  by  telU 
}ng  us, 

1.  *'  That  the  prerogative  of  the  king  to  be  above 
*^  the  law,  is  only  for  the  good  of  them  that  are 
"^^  under  the  law,  and  to  preferve  their  liberties." 

2.  *^  That  there  can  be  no  laws  without  a  fu- 
*^  preme  pinver  to  command  or  make  them  :  in 

ariftccracies  the  noblemen  are  above  the  law  ;  in 
democracies  the  people  :  by  the  like  reafon  in  a 
m.onarchy,  the  king  muft  of  neceflity  be  above 
the  law.  There  can  be  no  fovereign  majefly  in 
*'  hira  that  is  under  the  law  :  that  which  gives  the 
very  being  to  a  king,  is  the  power  to  give  laws, 
Witliout  this  povvTr  he  is  but  an  equivocal  king* 
^-  It  fklHs  not  how  he  comes  by  this  power,  whether 
^^  by  eledjon,    donation,    fucceflion,  or  any  other 


cc 


cc 


means,'^ 


Sea.  2  r .     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      1 8  3 

*'  means."     I  am  contented  in  fome  degree  to  fol- 
low our  author,  and  to  acknowledge  that  the  king 
neither  has  nor  can  have  any  prerogative  v/hich  is 
not  for  the  good  of  the  people,  and  the  prefervation 
of  their  liberties.     This  therefore  is  the  foundation 
of  magiftratical  power,  and  the  only  way  of  dif- 
cerning  whether    the  prerogative  of  making  lav/s, 
of  being  above  laws,  or  any  other  he  may  pretend, 
be  juftly  due  to  him  or  not :  and  if  it  be  doubted 
who  is  the  fittefl  judge  to  determine  that  queffion, 
common  fenfe  will  inform  us,  that  if  the  ma2;ifl:rate 
receive  his  power  by  eleftion  or  donation,  they  who 
elecSt,  or  give  him  that  power,  beft  know  whether 
the  good   they  fought  be  performed  or  not ;  if  by 
fucceliion,  they   who   inftituted  the   fucceflion ;  if 
otherwife,  that  is,  by  fraud  or  violence,  the  point 
is  decided,  for  he  has  no  fight  at  all,  and  none  can 
be  created  by  thofe  means.     This  might  be  faid, 
tho'  all  princes  were  of  ripe  age,  fober,  wife,  yoSk. 
and  good ;  for  even  the  beft  are  fubjed:  to  miftakes 
and  paffions,  and  therefore  unfit  to  be  judges  of  their 
own  concernments,  in  which  they  may  by  various 
means  be  mifguided  :  but  it  would  be  extrem.e  mad- 
nefs  to  attribute  the  fame  to  children,  fools,  or  mad- 
men, who  are  not  able  to  judge  of  the  leaft  things 
concerning  themfelves  or  others ;  but  moft  efpecial- 
ly  to  thofe  who,  coming  in  by  ulurpation,  declare 
their  contempt  of  all  human  and  divine  laws,  and 
are  enemies  to  the  people  they  opprefs.  None  there- 
fore can  be  judges  of  fuch  cafes  but  the  people,  for 
whom  and  by  whom  the  conftitutions  are   made  ; 
or  their  reprefentatives  and  delegates,  to  whom  they 

■give  the  power  of  doing  it. 

But  nothing  can  be  more  abfurd  than  to  fay,  that 
one  man  has  an  abfolute  power  above  law  to  govern 
according  to  his  wdll,  *'  for  the  people's  good,    aad 

(.?*  the  prefervation  of  their  liberty;"  for  no  liberty 

N  4  can 


i84  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

can  fubfift  where  there  is  fuch  a  power;  and  we 
have  no  other  way  of  dlftinguiihing  between  free 
nations  and  fuch  as  are  not  fo,  than  that  the  free 
are  governed  by  their  own  laws  and  magiftrates  ac- 
cording to  their  own  mind,  and  that  the  others 
either  have  willingly  fubjefted  themfelves,  or  are  by 
forcel)rought  under  the  power  of  one  or  more  men, 
to  be  ruled  according  to  his  or  their  pleafure.  The 
fame  diilindlion  holds  in  relation  to  particular  per- 
fons.  He  is  a  free  man  who  lives  as  befl  pleafes 
himfelf,  under  laws  made  by  his  own  confent ;  and 
the  name  of  ilave  can  belong  to  no  man,  unlefs  to 
him  who  is  either  born  in  the  houfe  of  a  mafter, 
bought,  taken,  fubdued,  or  willingly  gives  his  ear 
to  be  nailed  to  the  poft,  and  fubjeds  himfelf  to  the 
will  of  another.  Thus  were  the  Grecians  faid  to 
be  free  in  oppofition  to  the  Mcdes  and  Perfians,  as 
■^  Artabanus  acknowledged  in  his  difcourfe  to  The- 
miftocles.  In  the  fame  manner  the  Italians,  Ger- 
mans and  Spaniards  were  diftinguifli'd  from  the 
eaftern  nations,  who  for  the  moft  part  were  un- 
der' the  power  of  tyrants,  Rome  was  faid  to 
have  recovered  liberty  by  the  expulfion  of  the 
Tarquins ;  or  as  Tacitus  expreffes  it,  -j-  ''  Lucius 
^'  Brutus  eftabliflied  liberty  and  the  confulate  to- 
*'  gether,'*  as  if  before  that  time  they  had  never 
enjoyed  any ;  and  Julius  Caefar  is  faid  to  have  over- 
thrown the  liberty  of  that  people.  But  if  Filmer 
deferve  credit,  the  Romans  were  free  under  Tar- 
quin,  enflaved  when  he  was  driven  away,  and  his 
.  prerogative  extinguifh'd,  that  was  fo  neceilarily  re- 
quired for  the  defence  of  their  liberty ;  and  were 
never  reftored  to  it,  till  Caefar  afTum'd  all  the  power 
to  himfelf      By    the    fame    rule    the    Switzers, 

*  Plat.  vit.  Themlft. 

f  Libertatem  &  confulatum  L.  Brutus  inflitult.     J//.  L  i. 

Grifons^ 


5ea.2i.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      185 

-Grifons,    Venetians,    Hollanders,    and  fome  other 
nations  are  now  flaves ,  and  Tufcany,  the  kingdom 
of  Naples,  the  ecclefiaftical  ftate,  with  fuch  as  live 
under  a  more  gentle  mafter  on  the  other  fide  of  the 
water,  I  mean  the  Turk,  are  free  nations.  Nay  the 
Florentines,  who  complain  of  flavery  under  the  houfe 
of  Medicis,    were  made  free  by  the  power  of  a 
Spanifh  army  who  fet  up  a  prerogative  in  that  gentle 
family,  which  for  their  good  has  deilroyed  all  that 
could  juftly  be  called  fo  in  that  country,  and  almoft 
,wholly  difpeopled  it.     I,  who  efteem  myfelf  free, 
becaufe  I  depend  upon  the  Will  of  no  man,    and 
.hope  to  die  in  the  liberty  I  inherit  from  my  ancef- 
tors,  am   a  flave ;    and  the  Moors  or  Turks,  who 
may  be  beaten  and  kilFd  whenever  it  pleafes  their 
.infolent  mafters,  are  free  men.  But  furely  the  world 
is  not  fo  much  miftaken  in  the  fignification  of  words 
and  things.     The   weight  of   chains,    number  of 
.  ftripes,  hardnefs  of  labour,    and  other  effeds  of  a 
imafter's  cruelty,  may  make  one  fervitude  more  mi- 
ferable  than  another  ;  but  he  is  a  Have  who  ferves 
the  beft  and  gentleft  man  in  the  world,  as  well  as  he 
who  ferves  the  worft;  and  he  does  ferve  him  if  he 
■  muft  obey,  his  commands,  and  depends  upon  his  will. 
For  this  reafon  the  *   poet  ingenioufly  flattering  a 
good  emperor,  faid,  that  liberty  was  not  more  defir- 
able,  than  to  ferve  a  gentle  mafler  -,  but  ftill  acknow- 
•  ledged  that  it  was  a  fervice,  diftind  from,  and  contra- 
ry to  liberty :  and  it  had  not  been  a  handfom  compli- 
ment, unlefs  the  evil  of  fervitude  were  fo  extreme, 
that  nothing  but  the  virtue  and  goodnefs  of  the 
mafter  could  any  way  compenfate  or  alleviate  it. 
Now  tho'  it  fhould  be  granted  that  he  had  fpoken 
more  like  to  a  philofopher  than  a  poet  5  that  we 
might  take  his  words  in  the  ftrideft  fenfe,  and  think 
It  poflible  to  find  fuch  conveniencies  in  a  fubjedion  to 

'      .  f  Claudian.  • 

the 


tS6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

the  will  of  a  good  and  wife  mafter,  as  may  balance 
the  lofs  of  liberty,  it  would  be  nothing  to  the 
qoeftion  ;  becaufe  that  liberty  is  thereby  acknow- 
ledged to  be  deftroyed  by  the  prerogative,  which  is 
only  infiitiited  to  preferve  it.  If  it  were  true  that 
no  liberty  were  to  be  preferred  before  the  fervice  of 
a  good  mafter,  it  could  be  of  no  ufe  to  the  perifh- 
ing  world,  which  Filmer  and  his  difciples  would  by 
fuch  arguments  bring  into  a  fubjedion  to  children, 
ibols,  mad  or  vicious  men.  Thefe  are  not  cafes 
feigned  upon  a  diftant  imaginary  poflibility,  but  fo 
frequently  found  amongft  men,  that  there  are  few 
examples  of  the  contrary.  And  as  'tis  folly  to  fup- 
pofe  that  princes  v^^ill  always  be  wife,  juft  and  good, 
when  we  know  that  few  have  been  able  alone  to 
bear  the  weight  of  a  government,  or  to  refift  the 
temptations  to  ill,  that  accompany  an  unlimited 
power,  it  would  be  madnefs  to  prefume  they  will 
for  the  future  be  free  from  infirmities  and  vices. 
And  if  they  be  not,  the  nations  under  them  will 
not  be  in  fuch  a  condition  of  fervitude  to  a  good 
mafter  as  the  poet  compares  to  liberty,  but  in  a  mi- 
ferable  and  fliameful  fubjeftion  to  the  will  of  thofe 
who  know  not  how  to  govern  themfelves,  or  to  do 
good  to  others :  tho'  Moles,  Jofluia  and  Samuel 
had  been  able  to  bear  the  weight  of  an  unreftrained 
•power :  tho'  David  and  Solomon  had  never  abufed 
-that  which  they  had  ;  what  effe6l  could  this  have 
-upon  a  general  propolition  ?  Where  are  the  families 
that  always  produce  fuch  as  they  were  ?  When  did 
God  promife  to  affift  all  thofe  who  ftiould  attain  to 
•the  fovereign  power,  as  he  did  them  whom  he  chofe 
for  the  works  he  defigned  ?  Or  what  teftimony  can 
tFilmer  give  us,  that  he  has  been  prefent  with  all 
:thofe  who  have  hitherto  reigned  in  the  world  ?  But 
if  we  knovv  that  no  fuch  thing  either  is  oi*  has  been  ; 

and 


Seft.  2T.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      187 

and  can  find  no  pron^ife  to  afliire  us,  nor  reafon  to 
hope  that  it  ever  will  be,  'tis  as  fooliili  to  found  the 
hopes  of  preferving  a  people  upon  that  which  never 
was,  or  is  fo  likely  to  fail,  nay  rather  which  in  a 
fhort  time  moft  certainly  will  fail,  as  to  root  up 
vines  and  figtrees  in  expectation  of  gathering  grapes 
and  figs  from  thirties  and  briars.  This  would  be 
no  lefs  than  to  extinguifh  the  light  of  common  fenfe, 
to  negledl  the  means  that  God  has  given  us  to 
provide  for  our  fecurity,  and  to  impute  to  him  a 
difpofition  of  things  utterly  inconfiftent  with  his 
wifdom  and  goodnefs.  If  he  has  not  therefore  or-^ 
der'd  that  thorns  and  thirties  (liould  produce  figs  and 
grapes,  nor  that  the  moft  important  works  in  the 
world,  which  are  not  without  the  utmoft  difficulty, 
if  at  all,  to  be  performed  by  the  bert  and  wifeft  of 
men,  fhould  be  put  into  the  hands  of  the  weakeft, 
mort  foolifli  and  worrt,  he  cannot  have  ordain'd  that 
fuch  men,  women  or  children  as  happen  to  be  born 
in  reigning  families,  or  get  the  power  into  their 
hands  by  fraud,  treachery  or  murder  (as  very  many 
have  done)  fhould  have  a  right  of  difpofing  all 
things  according  to  their  will.  And  if  men  cannot 
be  guilty  of  fo  great  an  'abfurdity  to  trurt  the  weak- 
eft  and  wcrft  with  a  power  which  ufually  fubverts 
the  wifdom  and  virtue  of  the  beft ;  or  to  exped: 
fuch  efFedls  of  virtue  and  wifdom  from  thofe  who 
come  by  chance,  as  can  hardly,  if  at  all,  be  hoped 
from  the  moft  excellent,  our  author's  propofition 
can  neither  be  grounded  upon  the  ordinance  of  God, 
nor  the  inftitution  of  man.  Nay,  if  any  fuch  thing 
had  been  eftablifhed  by  our  firft  parents  in  their 
fimplicity,  the  utter  impoffibility  of  attaining  what 
they  expefted  from  it,  muft  wholly  have  abrogated 
the  eftablifliment:   or  rather^  it  had  been  void  frorn 

the 


i88  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

the  beginning,  becaufe  it  was  not  "  a  juft  fand:ion, 
**  commanding  things  good,  and  forbidding  the 
*'  contrary*,*'  but  a  foolifh  and  perverfe  fandlion, 
fetting  up  the  unruly  appetite  of  one  perfon  to  the 
fubverfion  of  all  that  is  good  in  the  world,  by  making 
the  wifdoni  of  the  aged  and  experienc'd  to  depend 
upon  the  will  of  women,  children  and  fools ;  by 
fending  the  ftrong  and  the  brave  to  feek  protedion 
from  the  moil  weak  and  cowardly,  and  fubjed:ing 
the  moft  virtuous  and  beft  of  men  to  be  deftroy'd  by 
%  the  moft  wicked  and  vicious.  Thefe  being  the 
effecls  of  that  unlimited  prerogative,  which  our 
author  fays  was  only  inftituted  for  the  good  and  de- 
fence of  the  people,  it  muft  neceffarily  fall  to  the 
ground,  unlefs  flavery,  mifery,  infamy,  deftrudion 
and  defolation  tend  to  the  prefer  vation  of  liberty,  and 
are  to  be  prefer'd  before  ftrength,  glory,  plenty, 
fecurity  and  happinefs.  The  ftate  of  the  Roman 
empire  after  the  ufurpation  of  Csfar  will  fet  this 
matter  in  the  cleareft  light;  but  haying  done  it  already 
in  the  former  parts  of  this  work,  I  content  myfelf 
to  refer  to  thofe  places.  And  tho'  the  calamities 
they  fuffer'd  were  a  little  allayed  and  moderated  by 
the  virtues  of  Antoninus  and  M.  Aurelius,  with  one 
or  two  more,  yet  we  have  no  example  of  the  con- 
tinuance of  them  in  a  family,  nor  of  any  nation 
great  or  fmall  that  has  been  under  an  abfolute  power, 
which  does  not  too  plainly  manifeft,  that  no  man  or 
fucceffion  of  men  is  to  be  trufted  with  it. 

But  fays  our  author,  '^  there  can  be  no  law  where 
M;  there  is  not  a  fupreme  power,"  and  from  thence 
very  ftrongly  concludes  it  muft  be  in  the  king  :  for 
^jy  Other  wife  there  can  be  no  fovereign  majefty  in  him, 
^^  and'he  is  but  an  equivocal  king.''     This  might  i] 

*  Sandio  recla,  jubens  honefia,  prohi^ens  contraria.    Ci(sro, 

have 


Sea:.  21.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     1K9 

have   been  of  fom^  force,    if  governments    were 
eftablifhed,  and  law^s  made  only  to  advance   that 
fovereign  majefty ;  but  nothing  at  all  to  the  purpole, 
if  (as  he  confelTes)  the  power  which  the  prince  has, 
be  given  for  the  good  of  the  people,  and  for  the  defence 
of  every  private  man's  life,  liberty,  lands  and  goods : 
-for  that  which  is  inftituted,  cannot  be  abrogated  for 
w  ant  of  that  w^h  ich  was  never  intended  in  the  inftitution . 
If  the  public  fafety  be  provided,  liberty  and  property 
fecured,  juftice  adminiftred,  virtue  encouraged,  vice 
fuppreifed,  and  the  true  intereft  of  the  nation  ad- 
vanced, the  ends  of  government  are  accomplifhed ; 
and  the  higheft  muft  be  contented  with  fuch  a  pro- 
portion of  glory  and  majefty  as  is  confiftent  with 
the  public;  lince  the  magiftracy  h  not  inftituted,  nor 
any  perfon  placed  in  it  for  the  increafe  of  his  ma- 
iefty,  but  for  the  prefervation  of  the  whole  people, 
and  the  defence  of  the  liberty,  life  and  eftate  of  every 
private  man,    as  our  author  himfelf  is  forced  to 
acknowledge. 

t  But  what  is  this  fovereign  majefty,  fo  infeparable 
from  royalty,  that  one  cannot  fubfift  without  the 
X)ther  ?  Caligula  placed  it  in  a  power  of  *  doing  what 
he  pleafed  to  all  men  :  Nimrod,  Nabuchodonofor 
and  others,  with  an  impious  and  barbarous  infolence 
boafted  of  the  greatnefs  of  their  power.  They 
thought  it  a  glorious  privilege  to  kill  or  fpare  whom 
they  pleafed.  But  fuch  kings  as  by  God's  permifiion 
might  have  been  fet  up  over  his  people,  were  to 
'have  nothing  of  this.  They  were  not  to  multiply 
gold,  filver,  wives,  or  horfes-f';  they  were  not  to 
govern  by  their  own  will,  but  according  to  the  law; 
from  which  they  might  not  recede,  nor  raife  their 
hearts  above  their  brethren.     Here  were  kings  with- 

*  Omnia  mihi  in  omnesliccre,     Sueton. 

f  Deut.  xvii,  « 

out 


,90  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

out  that  unlimited  power,  which  makes  up  the 
fovereign  majefty,  that  Filmer  affirms  to  be  fo  effen- 
tial  to  kings,  that  without  it  they  are  only  equivocal ; 
which  proving  nothing  but  the  incurable  perverfenefe 
of  his  judgment,  the  malice  of  his  heart,  or  maligr 
nity  of  his  fate,  always  to  oppofe  reafon  and. truths 
we  are  to  efteem  thofe  to  be  kings  who  are  defcribed 
to  be  fo  by  the  fcriptures,  and  to  give  another  name  to 
thofe  who  endeavour  to  advance  their  own  glory, 
<:ontrary  to  the  precept  of  God  and  the  intereft  of 
rnankind. 

Butunlefs  the  light  of  reafon  had  been  extlnguiflied 
in  him,  he  might  have  ftcn,  that  tho'  no  law  could 
be  made  without  a  fupreme  power,  that  fupremacy 
may  be  in  a  body  confifting  of  many  men,  and 
ieveral  orders  of  men.  If  it  be  true,  which  perhaps 
may  be  doubted,  that  there  have  been  in  the  world 
fimple  monarchies,  ariftocracies  or  democracies 
legally  eftablifhed,  'tis  certain  that  the  mofl  pait  of 
the  governments  of  the  world  (and  I  think  all  that 
are  or  have  been  good)  were  mixed.  Part  of  the 
power  has  been  confer'd  upon  the  king,  or  the 
magiftrate  that  reprefented  him,  and  part  upon  th© 
fenate  and  people,  as  has  been  proved  in  relation  to 
the  governments  of  the  Hebrews,  Spartans,  Romans, 
Venetians,  Germans,  and  all  thofe  who  jive  under 
that  which  is  ufually  called  the  gothic  polity.  If 
tlie  fmgle  perfon  participating  of  this  divided  power 
diilike  either  the  name  he  beai's,  or  the  authority  he 
has,  he  may  renounce  it:  but  no  reafon  can  be 
from  thence  drawn  to  the  prejudice  of  nations^ 
who  give  fo  much  as  they  think  confiftent  with 
their  own  good,  and  referve  the  reft  to  them*, 
felves,  or  to  fuch  other  officers  as  they  plcafe  to 
eftablifli. 

No 


Sea.  21.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      191 

No  man  will  deny  tliat  feveral  nations  have  had  a 
right  of  giving  power  to  confuls,  didlators,  archons, 
fuffetes,  dukes  and  other  magiftrates,  in  fuch  pro- 
portions as  feemed  moft  conducing  to  their  own  good ; 
and  there  muft  be  a  right  in  every  nation  of  allotting 
to  kings  fo  much  as  they  pleafe,  as  well  as  to  the 
others,  unlefs  there  be  a  charm  in  the  word  king, 
or  in  the  letters  that  compofe  it.  But  this  cannot 
be  ;  for  there  is  no  iimilitude  between  king,  Rex, 
and  Bazileus  :  they  muft  therefore  have  a  right  of 
regulating  the  power  of  kings,  as  well  as  that  of 
confuls  or  didators  ^  and  it  had  not  been  more  ridi- 
culous in  Fabius,  Scipio,  Camillus  or  Cincinnatus, 
to  aflert  an  abfolute  power  in  himfelf,  under  pretence 
of  advancing  his  fovereign  majefty  againft  the  law, 
than  for  any  king  to  do  the  like.  But  as  all  nations 
give  what  form  they  pleafe  to  their  government,  they  are 
alfo  judges  of  the  name  to  be  impofed  upon  each  mian 
who  is  to  have  a  part  in  the  power:  and  'tis  as  lawful 
for  us  to  call  him  king,  who  has  a  limited  authority 
amongftus,  as  for  the  Medes  or  Arabs  to  give  the  fame 
name  to  one  who  is  more  abfolute.  If  this  be  not 
admitted,  we  are  content  to  fpeak  improperly,  but  ut- 
terly deny  that  when  we  give  the  name,  we  give  any 
thing  more  than  we  pleafe  5  and  had  rather  his  majefty 
fhould  change  his  name  than  to  renounce  our  owji 
rights  and  liberties  which  he  is  to  preferve,  and  which 
we  have  received  from  God  and  nature. 

But  that  the  folly  and  wickednefs  of  our  author 
may  not  be  capable  of  any  farther  aggravation,  he 
fays,  '*  That  it  {kills  not  how  he  come  by  the 
*'  power.'*  Violence  therefore  or  fraud,  treachery 
or  murder,  are  as  good  as  election,  donation  or  legal 
fucceflion.  'Tis  in  vain  to  exam.ine  the  laws  of 
God  or  man  5  the  rights  of  nature ;  whether  children 
do  inherit  the  dignities  and  magiftracies  of  their 
I  '  fathers;^ 


ij 


192  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

fathers,  as  patrimonial  lands  and  goods ;  whether 
regard  ought  to  be  had  to  the  iitnefs  of  the  perfon  j 
whether  all  iliould  go  to  one,  or  be  divided  amongft 
them ;  or  by  what  rule  we  may  know  who  is  the 
right  heir  to  the  fucceflion,  and  confequently  what 
we  are  in  confcience  obliged  to  do.  Our  author 
tells  us  in  ihort,  it  matters  not  how  he  that  has  the 
power  comes  by  it. 

It  has  been  hitherto  thought,  that  to  kill  a  king 
(efpecially  a  good  king)  was  a  moft  abominable 
adlion.  They  who  did  it,  were  thought  to  be  in- 
cited by  the  worft  of  paflions  that  can  enter  into  the 
hearts  of  men ;  and  the  fevereft  punifliments  have 
been  invented  to  deter  them  from  fuch  attempts,  or 
to  avenge  their  death  upon  thofe  who  Ihould  accom- 
plifh  it :  but  if  our  author  may  be  credited,  it  muft 
be  the  moft  commendable  and  glorious  ad:  that  can 
be  performed  by  man  :  for  befides  the  outward  ad* 
vantages  that  men  fo  earneftly  delire,  he  that  does 
it,  is  prefently  inverted  with  the  fovereign  majefty, 
and  at  the  fame  time  becomes  God's  vicegerent,  and 
the  father  of  his  country,  poffeffed  of  that  govern- 
ment, which  in  exclulion  to'all  other  forms  is  only  fa- 
voured by  the  laws  of  God  and  nature.  The  only  in- 
convenience is,  that  all  depends  upon  fuccefs,  and 
he  that  is  to  be  the  minifter  of  God,  and  father  of 
his  country  if  he  fucceed,  is  the  worft  of  all  villains 
if  he  fail ;  and  at  the  beft  may  be  deprived  of  all 
by  the  fame  means  he  employed  to  gain  it.  Tho'  a 
prince  fhould  have  the  wifdom  and  virtues  of  Mo- 
les, the  valour  of  Joihua,  David  and  the  Macca- 
bees, with  the  gentlenefs  and  integrity  of  Samuel, 
the  moft  fooliih,  vicious,  bafe  and  deteftable  man 
in  the  world  that  kills  him,  and  feizes  the  power, 
becomes  his  heir,  and  father  of  the  people  that  he 
governed ;  it  Ikilis  not  how  he  did  it,  whether  in 

■  I  i      open 


I 


5ta.  2i,    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     193 

open  battle  or  by  fecret  treachery,  in  the  field  or  in 
the  bed,  by  poifon  or  by  the  fword:  the  vileft  flave  in 
Ifrael  had  become  the  Lord's  anointed,  if  he  could 
have  killed  David  or  Solomon,  and  found  villains 
to  place  him  in  the  throne.  If  this  be  right,  the 
world  has  to  this  day  lived  in  darknefs,  and  the 
actions  which  have  been  thought  to  be  the  mofl  de- 
teftable,  are  the  moft  commendable  and  glorious. 
But  not  troubling  my  felf  at  prefent  to  decide  this 
queftion,  I  leave  it  to  kings  to  confider  how  much 
they  are  beholden  to  Filmer  and  his  difciples,  who 
fet  fuch  a  price  upon  their  heads,  as  would  render 
it  hard  to  preferve  their  lives  one  day,  if  the  doc- 
trines were  received  which  they  endeavour  to  infufe 
into  the  minds  of  the  people ;  and  concluding  this 
point,  only  fay,  that  we  in  England  know  no  other- 
king  than  he  who  is  fo  by  law,  nor  any  power  in 
that  king  except  that  which  he  has  by  law  :  and 
tho'  the  Roman  empire  was  held  by  the  power  of 
the  fword  ;  and  Ulpian  a  corrupt  lawyer  undertakes 
to  fay,  that  "  the  prince  is  not  obliged  by  the  laws;" 
yet  Theodofius  confeffed,  that  it  was  the  glory  of  a 
good  emperor  to  acknowledge  himfelf  bound  by 
them^ 

SECT.      XXII. 

The  rigour  of  the  law  is  to  be  tempered  by  men  of 
known   integi'ity  and  judgme?it^  and  not  by  the 
prince  %vho  tnay  be  ignorant  or  vicious, 

OUR  author's  next  fhift  is  to  place  the  king 
above  the  law,  that  he  may  mitigate  the  ri- 
gour of  it,  without  which  he  fays,  ^'  The  cafe  of 
**  the  fubje<fl  would  be  defperately  miferable."  But 
this  cure  would  prove  worfe  than  the  difeafe.  Such 
pious  fathers  of  the  people  as  Caligula,  Nero  or  Do- 
VoL.  11.      •  O  mitian. 


/ 


194  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

mitian,  were  not  like  to  mitigate  the  rigour ;  nor 
fuch  as  inherit  crowns  in  their  infancy  (as  the  pre- 
fent  kings  of  Spain,  France  and  Sweden)  fo  well  to 
underftand  the  meaning  of  it  as  to  decide  extraor- 
dinary cafes.  The  wifdom  of  nations  has  provided 
more  affured  helps ;  and  none  could  have  been  fo 
brutifli  and  negligent  of  the  public  concernments, 
to  fuffer  the  fucceffion  to  fall  to  Women,  children, 
&c.  if  they  had  not  referved  a  power  in  themfelves 
to  prefer  others  before  the  neareft  in  blood,  if  reafon 
require  ;  and  prefer ibed  fuch  rules  as  might  preferve 
the  public  from  ruin,  notwithftanding  their  infirmi* 
ties  and  vices.  Thcfe  helps  provided  by  our  laws, 
are  principally  by  grand  and  petit  juries,  who  are 
not  only  judges  of  matters  of  fadt,  as  whether  a 
man  be  killed,  but  whether  he  be  killed  criminally, 
Thefe  men  are  upon  their  oaths,  and  may  be  indid- 
ed  of  perjury  if  they  prevaricate  :  the  judges  are  pre- 
fent,  not  only  to  be  a  check  upon  them,  but  to  ex- 
plain fuch  points  of  the  law  as  may  feem  difficult. 
And  tho'  thefe  judges  may  be  fald  in  fome  fenfe  to 
be  chofen  by  the  king,  he  is  not  underflood  to  do 
k  other  wife  than  by  the  advice  of  his  council,  who 
cannot  perform  their  daty,  unlefs  they  propofefuch 
as  in  their  confciences  they  tliink  moft  worthy  of 
the  office,  and  mod  capable  of  performing  the  duty 
rightly  ;  nor  he  accomplifli  the  oath  of  his  corona- 
tion, unlefs  he  admit  thofe,  who  upon  deliberation 
feem  to  be  the  beft.  The  judges  being  thus  chofen, 
are  fo  far  from  depending  upon  the  will  of  the  king, 
that  they  fwear  faithfully  to  ferve  the  people  as  well 
as  the  king*,  and  to  do  juftice  to  every  man  accord-  | 
ing  to  the  law  of  the  lantl,  notvvithllandingany  writs,  j| 
letters  or  commands  received  from  him  -,  and  in  de-  j 
fault  thereof  they  are  to  forfeit  their  bodieS;,    lands  ^ 

*  i8  EJw.  111.  cap.  I, 

and 


Sea.  2  2.  Concerning  government.    195 

and  goods,  as  in  cafes  of  treafon.     Thefe  laws  have 
been  io  often,  and  fo  feverely  executed,  that  it  con- 
cerns all  judges  well  to  conlider  them;    and  the 
cafes    of   Trelilian,  Empfon,    Dudley,   and   others 
fliew,  that  neither  the  king  s  preceding  command 
nor  fubfequent  pardon  could  preferve  them  from  the 
punifhment  they  defer ved.      All  men  knew  that 
what  they  did  was  agreeable  to  the  king's  pleafure^ 
for  TrefiUan  advanced  the  prerogative  of  Edward 
the  fecond,  and  Empfon  brought  great  treafures  in- 
to the  coffers  of  Henry  the  feventh.     Neverthelefs 
they  were  charged  with  treafon,  for  fubverting  the 
laws  of  the  land^  and  executed  as  traitors.-     Tha' 
England  ought  never  to  forget  the  happy  reign  of 
Q^Elizabeth,  yet  it  miift  be  acknowledged,  that 
{he  as  well  as  others  had  her  failings.     She  was  full 
of  love  to  the  people,  juft  in  her  nature,  fincere  ia 
her  intentions ;  but  could  not  fo  perfedtly  difcovef 
the  fnares  that  were  laid  for  her,  or  refill  the  im- 
portunity of  the  perfons  fhe  mofi:  trufted,  as  not 
fometimes  to  be  brought  to  attempt  things  againft 
law.     She  and  her  counfellors  prefTed  the  judges 
^ery  hardly  to  obey  the  patent  under  her  great  feal, 
in  the  cafe  of  Cavendifh  :  but  thev  anfwered,  "  That 
**  both  ihe  and  they  had  taken  an  oath  to  keep  the 
"  law,  and  if  they  fhould  obey  her  commands,  the 
•*  law  would  not  warrant  them,  &c*."  And  befides 
the  offence  again  ft  God,  their  country,  and  the  com- 
monwealth, they  alledged  the  example  of  Empfon 
and  Dudley,  *'  whereby,  they  faid,  they  wxre  de- 
"  terred  from  obeying  her  illegal  commands,'''  They 
who  had  fworn  to  keep  the  law  not withftan ding  the 
king's  writs,  knevv  that  the  law  depended  not  upon 
his  will  1  and  the  fame  oath  that  obheed  them  not 
to  regard  any  command  they  Ibould  receive  fr^m 

'Anderfon'?  Rep,  p.  X55. 


,56  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Hi. 

him,  (lie wed  that  they  were  not  to  expeft  indem- 
nity by  it,  and  not  only  that  the  king  had  neither 
the  power  of  making,  altering,    mitigating  or  in- 
terpreting the  law,  but  that  he  was  not  at  all  to  be 
heard,    in  general  or  particular  matters,  otherwife 
than  as  he  fpeaks  in  the  common  courfe  of  juftice, 
by  the  courts  legally  eilabliflied,     which  fay  the 
fame  thing,  whether  he  be  young  or  old,  ignorant 
or  wife,  v>^icked  or  good :  and  nothing  does  better 
evidence  the  wifdom  and  care  of  our  anceflors,  in 
framing  the   laws  and  government  we  live  under, 
than  that  the  people  did  not  fuffer  extremities  by 
the  vices  or  infirmities  of  kings,  till  an  age  more 
full  of  malice  than  thofe  in  which  they  lived,  had 
found  tricks  to  pervert  the  rule,  and  fruftrate  their 
honeft  intentions.     It  was  not  fafe  for  the  kings  to 
violate  their  oaths  by  an  undue  interpofition  of  their 
authority ;  but  the  minifters  who  ferved  them  in 
thofe  violations,  have  feldom  efcaped  puniihment. 
This  is  to  be  underftood  when  the  deviations  from 
juilice  are  extreme  and  mifchievous,  for  fomething 
muft  always  be  allowed  to  human  frailty  :  The  beft 
have  their  defedls,  and  none  could  Hand  if  a  too 
exadl:  fcrutiny  were  made  of  all  their  aftions.  Ed- 
ward the  third,    about  the  twentieth  year  of  his 
reign,  acknowledged  his  own  in  parliament,  and  as 
well  for  the  eafe  of  his  confcience,  as  the  fatisfadion 
of  his  people,    promoted  an  ad:,  ''  Commanding 
all  judges  to  do  juftice,  notwithftanding  any  writs, 
letters  or  commands  from  himfelf,  and  forbidding 
thofe  that  belonged  to  the  king,  queen  and  prince, 
*'  to  intermeddle  in  thofe  matters."     But  if  the  beft 
and  wifeft  of  our  princes,  in  the  ftrength  and  ma- 
turity of  their  years,  had  their  failings,  and  every 
a(5l  proceeding  from  them  that  tended  to  the  inter- 
ruption of  juftice  was  a  failing,  how  can  it  be  faid 

that 


Seel.  22.  CONCERNING  GOVERNxMENT.      197 

that  the  king  in  his  perfonal  capacity,  directly  or 
indiredlly,  may  enter  into  the  dilcuffion  of  thefe 
matters,  much  lefs  to  determine  them  according  to 
his  will  ? 

"  But,  fays  our  author,  the  law  is  no  better  than 
*'  a  tyrant ;  general  pardons   at  the  coronation  and 
**  in  parliament,  are  but  the  bounty  of  the  preroga- 
*^  tive,  &c.  There  may  be  hard  cafes ;"  and  citing 
fome  perverted  pieces  from  Ariftotle's  ethics   and 
politics,    adds,  "  That   when  fomething  falls  out 
*'  befides  the  general  rule,  then  it  is  fit  that  what 
"  the  lawmaker  hath  omitted,  or  where  he  hath 
**  erred  by  fpeaking  generally,  it  fliould  be  corredl- 
"  ed  and  fupplied,    as  if  the  lawmaker  were  pre- 
*'  fent  that  ordained  it.  The  governor,  whether  he  be 
*'  one  man  or  more,  ought  to  be  lord  of  thefe  things, 
"  whereof  it  was  impoflible  that  the  law  fliould 
*'  fpeak  exactly ."     Thefe  things  are  in  part  true ; 
but  our  author  makes  ufe  of  them  as  the  devil  does 
of  fcripture,  to  fubvert  the  truth.     There  may  be 
fomething  of  rigour  in  the  law  that  in  fome  cafes 
may  be  mitigated  -,  and  the  law  itfelf  (in  relation  to 
England)  does  fo  far  acknowledge  it,  as  to  refer 
much  to  the  confclences  of  juries,  and  thofe  who 
are  appointed  to  affift  them  ;  and  the  moft  difficult 
cafes  are  referred  to  the  parliament  as  the  only  judges 
that  are  able  to  determine  them.     Thus  the  ftatute 
of  the  35   Edward  III.    enumerating  the  crimes 
then  declared  to  be  treafon,  leaves  to  future  parlia- 
ments to  j  udge  what  other  fa6ts  equivalent  to  them 
may  deferve  the  fame  punifhment :  and  'tis  a  general 
rule  in  the  law,  which  the  judges  are  fworn  to  ob- 
ferve,  that  difficult  cafes  fhould  be  referved  till  the  par- 
liament meet,  who  are  only  able  to  decide  them :  and 
if  there  be  any  inconvenience  in  this,  *tis  becaufe  they 
do  not  meet  fo  frequently  as  the  law  requires^  or  by 

O  3  finiftei: 


igS  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

{inifter  means  are  interrupted  in  their  fitting.  But 
nothing  can  be  more  abfurd  than  to  fay,  that  becaufe 
the  king  does  not  call  parliaments  as  the  law  and  his 
oath  requires,  that  power  fliould  accrue  to  him,  which 
the  law  and  the  confent  of  the  nation  has  placed  in 
them. 

There  is  alfp  fucha  thing  in  the  law  as  a  general 
qr  particular  pardon,  and  the  king  may  in  fome  de- 
gree be  entrufted  with  the  power  of  giving  it,  efpeci? 
ally  for  fuch  crimes  as  merely  relate  to  himfelf,  as 
^very  man  may  remit  the  injuries  dpne  to  himfelf  j 
but  the  confeffion  of  Edvv^ard  the  third,  ''  That  the 
^'  oath  of  the  crown  had  not  been  kept  by  reafon  of 
*^  thegrantof  pardons  contrary  to  ftatqtes*,"  and  a 
new  ad  made,  "  that  all  fuch  charters  of  pardon 
^'  from  henceforth  granted  againft  the  oath  of  the 
^'  crown  and  the  faidftatutes,  ihouldbeheld  for  none,'* 
demonftrates  that  this  power  was  not  in  himfelf,  but 
granted  by  the  nation,  and  to  be  executed  according 
to  fuch  rules  as  the  law  prefcribed,  and  the  parliameiit; 
approved. 

Moreover,  there  havingbeen  many,  andfometimes 
bloody  contefts  for  the  crown,  upon  which  the 
nation  v/as  almoft  equally  divided  j  and  it  being 
difficult  for  them  to  know,  or  even  for  us  who  have 
^1}  the  parties  before  us,  to  judge  which  was  the 
better  fide,  it  was  underftood  that  he  who  came  tq 
be  crown'd  by  the  confent  of  the  people,  was  ac? 
peptable  to  all :  and  the  queftion  being  determined,  it 
was  ^o  way  fit  that  he  fliould  have  a  liberty  to  make 
i:^fe  of  the  public  authority  then  in  his  hands,  to  re^ 
Venge  fuch  perfonal  injuries  as  he  had,  or  might 
fuppofe  to  have  received,  which  might  raife  new, 
and  perhaps  more  dangerous  troubles,  if  the  authors 
pf  them  were  ftill  kept  in  fe^r  of  being  profeguted  | 

*  14  Edw.  III.  !<. 

mi 


5ea.  22.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      199 

and  nothing  could  be  more  unreafonablc  than  that  he 
fliould  employ  his  power  to  the  deftrudlion  of  thofc 
who  had  confented  to  make  him  king.  This  made 
it  a  matter  of  courfc  for  a  king,  as  foon  as  he  was 
crown'd,  to  iffuc  out  2  general  pardon,  \vhicli  was 
no  more  than  to  declare,  that  being  now  what  lie 
was  not  before,  he  had  no  enemy  upon  any  former 
account.  For  this  reafon  Lewis  the  twelfth  of  France, 
when  he  was  incited  to  revenge  himfelf  again  ft  thofe, 
who  in  the  reign  of  his  predeceffor  Charles  the  eighth, 
had  caufed  him  to  be  imprifoned  with  great  danger 
of  his  life,  made  this  anfwer,  "  That  the  king  of 
"  France  did  not  care  to  revenge  the  injuries  done 
"  to  the  duke  of  Orleans :"  and  the  laft  king  of 
Sweden  feemed  no  otherv/ife  to  remember  who  had 
oppofed  the  queen's  abdication,  and  his  eled:ion, 
than  by  conferring  honours  upon  them ;  becaufe  he 
knew  they  were  the  beft  men  of  the  nation,  and  fuch 
as  would  be  his  friends  when  they  fliould  fee  how  he 
would  govern,  in  which  he  was  not  deceived.  But 
left  all  thofe  who  might  come  to  the  crown  of 
England,  ftiould  not  have  the  fame  prudence  and 
generofity,  the  kings  were  obliged  by  a  cuftom  of  no 
lefs  force  than  a  law,  immediately  to  put  an  end  to 
all  difputes,  and  the  inconveniencies  that  might  arife 
from  them.  This  did  not  proceed  from  the  bounty 
of  the  prerogative  (which  I  think  is  nonfenfe,  for 
tho'  he  that  enjoys  the  prerogative  may  have  bounty, 
the  prerogative  can  have  none)  but  from  common 
fenfe,  from  his  obligation,  and  the  care  of  his  own 
fafety  j  and  could  have  no  other  efted:  in  law,  than 
what  related  to  his  perfon,  as  appears  by  the  forem.en- 
tioned  ftatute. 

Pardons  granted  by  a£t  of  parliament  are  of  another 
nature  :  for  as  the  king  who  has  no  other  power 

O  4  than 


20O  D  I  S  C  O  U  R  S  E  S       Chap.  IIi; 

than  by  law,  can  no  otherwife  difpenfe  with  the 
crimes  cammitted  againft  the  laws,  than  the  law 
does  enable  him  -,  the  parliament  that  has  the 
power  of  making  laws,  may  intirely  abolifli  the 
crimes,  and  unqueflionably  remit  the  punifliment  as 
they  pleafe, 

Tho'  fome  words  of  Ariftotle's  ethics  are  w^ith- 
put  any  coherence  fliufHed  together  by  our  author, 
with  others  taken  out  of  his  politics,  I  do  not  much 
lexcept  again ll  them.  No  law  made  by  man 
can  be  perfed:,  and  there  muft  be  in  every  nation  a 
power  of  correcting  fuch  defed:s  as  in  time  may  arife 
or  be  difcovered.  This  power  can  never  be  fo  rightly 
placed  as  "  in  the  fame  hand  that  has  the  right  of 
■  '  making  laws,  whether  in  one  perfon  or  in  many/* 
If  Fihuer  therefore  can  tell  us  of  a  place,  where  one 
man,  woman,  or  child,  however  he  or  (he  be 
qualified,  has  the  power  of  making  laws,  I  will 
acknowledge  that  not  only  the  hard  cafes,  but  as  many 
others  as  he  pleafcs,  are  referr'd  to  his  or  her  judg- 
ment, and  that  they  may  give  it,  whether  they  have 
any  underftanding  of  what  they  do  or  not,  whether 
they  be  drunk  or  fober,  in  their  fenfes  or  ftark  mad. 
But  as  I  know  no  fuch  place,  and  Ihould  not  be 
much  concerned  for  the  fufferings  of  a  people  that 
Hiould  bring  fuch  mifery  upon  themfelves,  as  muft 
accompany  an  abfolute  dependance  upon  the  unruly 
will  of  fuch  a  creature,  I  may  leave  him  to  feek  it, 
and  reil  in  a  perfedf  affurance  that  he  does  not  fpeak 
of  Enrfand,  which  acknowledees  no  other  law 
than  its  own ;  and  initead  of  receiving  any  from 
kings,  does  to  this  day  obey  none,  but  fuch  as  have 
been  made  by  our  anceflors,  or  ourfelves,  and  never 
admitted  any  king  that  did  not  fwear  to  obferve 
them.o     And  if  Ariilotle  deferve  credit,  the  power 

I  of 


Se6l.  23.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     201 

of  altering,  mitigating,  explaining  or  correding  the 
laws  of  England,  is  only  in  the  parliament,  becaufe 
none  but  the  parhament  can  make  them. 

SECT.     XXIIL 

Ariftotle  proves^  that  no  7nan  is  to  be  entrujled 
with  ari  abfolttte  power ^  by  Jhewing  that  no  one 
knows  how  to  execute  it^  but  fiich  a  man  as  is  not  to 
be  found. 

OU  R  author  having  falfely  cited  and  perverted 
the  fenfe  of  Ariftotle,  now  brings  him  in  fay- 
ing, ''  That  aperfeft  kingdom  is  that  wherein  the 
*'  king  rules  all  according  to  his  own  v/ill."  But 
tho'  I  have  read  his  books  of  government  with  fome 
attention,  I  can  find  no  fuch  thing  in  them,  unlefs 
the  word  which  fignifies  mere  or  abfolme  may  be 
juftly  tranflated  into  perfeB ;  which  is  fo  far  from 
Ariftotle's  meaning,  that  he  diflinguifhes  the  abfolute 
or  defpotical  kingdoms  from  the  legitimate  5  and 
commending  the  latter,  gives  no  better  name  than 
that  of  barbarous  to  the  firft,  which  he  fays  can  agree 
only  with  the  nature  of  fuch  nations  as  are  bafe  and 
ftupid,  little  differing  from  beafts  3  and  having  no 
fkill  to  govern,  or  courage  to  defend  themfelves, 
muft  refign  all  to  the  will  of  one  that  will  take  care 
of  them.  Yet  even  this  cannot  be  done,  unlefs  he 
that  fhould  take  that  care  be  wholly  exempted  from 
the  vices  w^hich  oblige  the  others  to  ftand  in  need  of 
it ;  for  otherwife  'tis  no  better  than  if  a  flieep  fhould 
undertake  to  govern  flieep,  or  a  hog  to  command 
fwine;  A riflotle  plainly  faying,  "  That  as  men  are 
*•*  by  nature  equal,  if  it  were  pofiible  all  fhould  be 
[[  magiftrates  *.'*     But  that  being  repugnant  to  the 

*  Arill.  Pol.  1.2.  c.  I, 

nature 


i 


202  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

nature  of  government,  he  finds  no  other  way  of 
folving  the  difficulty,  than  by  "  obeying  and  com- 
*'  manding  alternately  ;"  that  they  may  do  by  turns 
that  which  they  cannot  do  all  together,  and  to  which 
no  one  man  has  more  right  than  another,  becaufe  they 
are  all  by  nature  equal.  This  might  be  compofed 
by  a  more  compendious  way,  if,  according  to  our 
author's  doftrine,  poiTeffion  could  give  a  right.  But 
Ariftotle  fpeaking  like  a  philofopher,  and  not  like  a 
public  enemy  of  mankind,  examines  what  is  juft, 
reafonable,  and  beneficial  to  men,  that  is,  what  ought 
to  be  done,  and  which  being  done,  is  to  be  account- 
ed juft,  and  therefore  to  be  fupported  by  good  men. 
But  as  "  that  which  is  unjuft  in  the  beginning,  can 
**  never  have  the  efFedt  of  juftice  *;"  and  it  being 
manifeftly  unjuft  for  one  or  a  few  men  to  aflTume  a 
power  overthofe  who  by  nature  are  equal  to  them, 
no  fuch  power  can  be  juft  or  beneficial  to  mankind  j 
nor  fit  to  be  upheld  by  good  men,  if  it  be  unjuft  and 
prejudicial.  In  the  opinion  of  Ariftotle,  this  natural 
equality  continues  till  virtue  makes  the  diftindtion, 
which  muft  be  either  fimply  compleat  and  perfedl  in 
it  felf,  fo  that  he  who  is  endued  with  it,  is  a  God 
among  men,  or  relatively,  as  far  as  concerns  civil 
focietv,  and  the  ends  for  which  it  is  conftitu ted,  that 
is,  defence,  and  the  obtaining  of  juftice.  This 
requires  a  mind  unbiaflid  by  pafiion,  full  of  goodnefs 
and  wifdom,  firm  againft  all  the  temptations  to  ill, 
that  may  arife  from  defire  or  fear ;  tending  to  all 
manner  of  good,  through  a  perfe(5t  knowledge  and 
affedlion  to  it  ^  and  this  to  fuch  a  degree,  that  he  or 
thev  have  more  of  thefe  virtues  and  excellencies  than 
all  the  reft  of  the  fociety,  tho'  computed  together  -f- : 

*  Quod  ab  initio  injuftum  eft,  nullum  potell  Iiabere  juris  eiFe»^um. 
Qrot.  de  jur.  bel.  &  pac,   1.  3. 
f  hx'A.  Pol.  i,  3, 

where 


Sea.  23.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    203 

where  fach  a  man  is  found,  he  is  by  nature  a  king, 
and  *tis  beft  for  the  nation  where  he  is  that  he  govern. 
If  a  few  men,  tho'  equal  and  alike  among  themfelves, 
have  the   fame   advantages  above  the  reft  of  the 
people,  nature  for  the  fame  reafon  feems  to  eftabhfli 
an  ariftocracy  in  that  place;  and  the  power  is  more 
fafely  committed  to  them,  than  left  in  the  hands  of 
the  multitude.     But  if  this  excellency  of  virtue  do 
not  appear  in  one,  nor  in  a  few  men,  the  right  and 
power  is  by  nature  equally   lodged  in  all;  and  to 
aifume  or  appropriate  that  power  to  one,  or  a  few 
men,  is  unnatural  and  tyrannical,  which  in  Ariftotle  s 
language   comprehends   all  that   is  deteftable   and 
abominable. 

If  any  man  fhould  think   Ariftotle  a  trifler,  for 
fpeaking  of  fuch  a  man  as  can  never   be  found,  I 
finfwer,  that  he  went  as  far  as  his  way  could  be 
warranted  by  reafon  or  nature,  and  was  obliged  to 
ftop  there  by  the  defedl  of  his  fubjecl.     He  could 
not  fay  that  the  government  of  one  was  fimply  good, 
when  he  knew  fo  many  qualifications  were  required 
in  the  perfon  to  make  it  fo  ;  nor  that  it  is  good  for 
a  nation  to  be  under  the  power  of  a  fool,  a  coward, 
or  a  villain,  becaufe  *tis  good  to  be  under  a  man  of 
admirable  wifdom,  valour,  induftry  and   goodnefs  ^ 
pr  that  the  government  of  one  fhould  be  continued 
in  fuch  as  by  chance  fucceed  in  a  family,  becaufe  it 
was  given  to  the  firft  who  had  all  the  virtues  required, 
tho'  all  the  reafons  for  which  the  power  was  given 
f^il  in  the  fucceflbr  j  much  lefs  could  he  fay  that 
any  government  was  good,    which  was  not  good 
for  thofe  whofe  good  only  it  was  conftituted  to  pro- 
inpte. 

Moreover,  by  fhewing  who  only  is  fit  to  be  a 
monarch,  or  may  be  made  fuch,  without  violating 
tJie  laws  q{  nature  and  juftice^  he  (hews  who  cannot 


204  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

be  one :  and  he  who  fays  that  no  fuch  man  is  to 
be  found,  as  according  to  thex)pinion  of  Ariftotle 
can  be  a  monarch,  does  moift  ridiculoufly  alledge  his 
authority  in  favour  of  monarchs,  or  the  power  which 
fome  amongft  us  would  attribute  to  them.     If  any 
thing  therefore  may  be  concluded  from  his  words, 
'tis  this,  that  fince  no  power  ought  to  be  admitted 
which  is  not  jufl ;  that  none  can  be  jufi:  which  is  not 
good,  profitable  to  the  people,  and   conducing  to 
the  ends  for  which  it  is  conftituted  ;  that  no  man  can 
know  how  to  direct  the  power  to  thofe  ends,  can 
deferve,  or  adminifter  it,  unlefs  he  do  fo  far  excel  all 
thofe  that  are  under  him  in  wifdom,  juftice,  valour 
and  goodnefs,  as  to  poiTefs  more  of  thofe  virtues  than 
all  of  them  :  I  fay,  if  no  fuch  man  or  fucceffion  of 
men  be  found,  no  fuch  power  is  to  be  granted  to 
any  man,  or  fucceffion  of  men.     But  if  fuch  power 
be  granted,  the  laws  of  nature  and  reafon  are  over- 
thrown, and  the  ends  for  which  focieties  are  confti- 
tuted, utterly  perverted,  which  neceffarily  implies 
an  annihilation  of  the  grant.     And  if  a  grant  fo  made 
by  thofe  who  have  a  right  of  fetting  up  a  govern- 
ment among  themfelves,  do  perifh  through  its  own 
natural  iniquity  and  perverfity,  I  leave  it  to  any  man, 
whofe  underftanding  and  manners  are  not  fo  intirely 
corrupted  as  thofe  of  our  author,  to  determine  what 
name  ought  to  be  given  to  that  perfon,  who  not  ex- 
celling all  others  in  civil  and  moral  virtues,  in  the 
proportion  required  by  Ariftotle,  does  ufurp  a  power 
over  a  nation,  and  w^hat  obedience  the  people  owe  to 
fuch  a  one,     But  if  his  opinion  deferve  our  regard, 
tlie  king  by  having  thofe  virtues  is  Omnium  Opti- 
mus,  and  the  beft  guide  to  the  people,  "  to  lead 
^'  them    to    happinefs  by  the  ways    of  virtue  *." 
And  he  who  affumes  the  fame  power,  without  the 

*  Ad  funimum  bonam  fecundum  virtutein.     AriJl.Pol. 

qualification^ 


Sea.  24.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      20 - 


9 


qualifications  required,  is  Tyrannus  omnium  pefli- 
mus,  leading  the  people  to  all  manner  of  ill,  and 
in  confequence  to  deflrudtion, 

SECT.      XXIV. 

T'he  power  of  Auguftus  Caefar  was  not  ghen^  but 

ufurped. 

OUR  author's  next  inflance  is  ingenioufly  taken 
from  the  Romans,  ''  Who,  he  fays,    tho' 
*'  they  were  a  people  greedy  of  liberty,  freed  Au- 
"  guftus  from  the  neceffity  of  laws."  If  it  be  true, 
as  he  affirms,  that  fuch  a  prerogative  is  inftituted 
only  for  the  prefervation  of  liberty,  they  who  are 
moft  greedy  of  it,  ought  to  be  mod  forward  in 
eftablifhing  that  which  defends  it  beft.     But  if  the 
'weight  laid  upon  the  words  "  greedy  of  liberty,'*  &c. 
render  his  memory  and  judgment  liable  to  cenfure, 
the  unpardonable  prevarication  of   citing  any  adl 
done  by  the  Romans  in  the  time  of  Auguilus,  as 
done  freely,    fhews  him  to  be  a  man  of  no  faith. 
^'  Omnium  jura  in  fe  traxerat,"  fays  Tacitus  ^  of 
Auguftus ;  nothing  was  conferred  upon  him,    he 
took  all  to  himfelf ;  there  could  be  nothing  of  right 
in  that  which  was  wholly  ufurped.  And  neither  the 
people  or  the  fenate  could  do  any  thing  freely,  whilft 
they  were  under  the  power  of  a  mad  corrupted  fol- 
diery,  who  firft  betrayed,  and  then  fubdued  them. 
The  greateft  part  of  the  fenate  had  fallen  at  the 
battle  of  Pharfalia,  others  had  been  gleaned  up  in 
feveral  places,  the  reft  deftroyed  by  the  profcriptions^ 
and  that  which  then  retained  the  name  of  a  fenate, 
was  made  up  chiefly  of  thofe  who  had  been  his  mi- 
nifterSj  in  bringing  the  moft  miferable  flavery  upon 
their  own  country.     The  Roman  liberty,  and  that 

*  Annal.  1,   i. 

bravery 


2o6  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

bravery  of  fpirit  by  which  it  had  been  maintained, 
was  not  only  aboliflbed,  but  almoft  forgotten.  All 
conlideration  of  law  and  right  was  trampled  under 
foot ;  and  none  could  difpute  with  him,  who  by 
the  power  of  the  fv/ord  had  feized  the  authority 
both  of  the  fenate  and  people.  Nothing  was  fo 
extravagant,  that  might  not  be  extorted  by  the  in- 
folent  violence  of  a  conqueror,  who  had  thirty  mer- 
cenary legions  to  execute  his  commands.  The  un» 
corrupted  part  of  the  people  that  had  efcaped  the 
fword  of  Julius,  had  either  periflied  with  Hirtius 
and  Panfa,  Brutus  and  Cailius,  or  been  deftroyed  by 
die  deteftable  Triumvirate,  Thofe  that  remained 
could  lofe  nofhing  by  a  verbal  reiignation  of  their 
liberty,  which  they  had  neither  ftrength  nor  courage 
to  defend.  The  maglftracies  were  poiTefled  by  the 
creatures  of  the  tyrant ;  and  the  people  was  com- 
pofed  of  fuch  as  were  either  born  under  flavery, 
and  accuftomed  to  obev,  or  remained  under  the  ter- 
ror  of  thofe  arms  that  had  confumed  the  alfertors 
of  their  liberty.  Our  author  ftanding  in  need  of 
fome  Roman  example  was  obliged  to  feek  it  in  aa 
age,  when  the  laws  were  fubverted,  virtue  extin- 
guiihed,  injuftice  placed  in  the  throne,  and  fuch  as 
would  not  be  of  the  fame  fpirit,  expofed  to  the  ut- 
mofl  crueltv.  This  was  the  time  when  the  fovereim 
maiefty  fhined  in  glory  -,  and  they  who  had  raifed 
it  above  the  law,  made  it  alfo  the  objedt  of  their  re- 
ligion, by  adoring  the  flatues  of  their  opprefTor. 
The  corruption  of  this  court  fpread  itfelf  over  the 
beft  part  of  the  w^orld  -,  and  reduced  the  empire  to 
that  irrecoverable  weaknefs  in  which  it  languifli- 
ed  and  periihed.  This  is  the  flate  of  things  that 
pleafes  Filmer,  and  thofe  that  are  like  him,  who 
for  the  introduction  of  the  fame  among  us,  recom- 
mend fuch  an  elevation  of  the  fovereign  majefty, 

as 


Se6l.  25.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      207 

as  is  moft  contrary  to  the  laws  of  God  and  men, 
abhorred  by  all  generous  nations,  and  moft  efpecial- 
ly  by  our  anceftors,  who  thought  nothing  too  dear 
to  be  hazarded  in  the  defence  of  themfelves  and  us 
from  it, 

SECT.      XXV. 

Tl'be  regal  power  was  not  the  Jirjl  in  this  nation ; 
nor  7iece[farily  to  be  continued y  tho'  it  had  been 
thefirft. 

TRUTH  being  uniform  in  it  felf,  thofe  who 
defire  to  propagate  it  for  the  good  of  man- 
kind, lay  the  foundations  of  their  reafonings  in  fuch 
principles,  as  are  either  evident  to  common  fenfe, 
or  eafily  proved  :  but  cheats  and  impoftors  delight- 
ing in  obfcurity,  fuppofe  things  that  are  dubious  or 
falfe,  and  think  to  build  one  falfhood  upon  another ; 
and  our  author  can  find  no  better  way  to  perfuade 
us,  that  all  our  privileges  and  laws  are  from   the 
king,  than  by  faying,  **  That  the  firft  power  was* 
the  kingly  power,  which  was  both  in  this  and  all 
other  nations  in  the  world,  long  before  any  laws 
or  any  other  kind  of  government  was  thought  of  j 
from  whence  we  muft  neceffarily  infer,  that  the- 
"  common  law,  or  common  cuftoms  of  this  land 
were  originally  the  laws  and  commands  of  the 
king."     But  denying  both  thefe  points,  I  affirm, 

1 .  Firft,  That  there  was  a  power  to  make  kings 
before  there  was  any  king. 

2.  Tho'  kings  had  been  the  firft  created  magif- 
T|  trates  in  all  places  (as  perhaps  they  were  in  fome)  it 
^i  does  not  follow,  that  they  muft  continue  for  ever, 
i|  or  that  laws  are  from  them. 

I       To  the  firft;  I  think  no  man  will  deny,    that 


cc 

C( 
(C 

<( 


2  king 


£oB  DISCOURSES-       Chap.  III. 

king  of  that  place.  This  people  had  a  power  -,  for 
no  number  of  men  can  be  without  it:  nay,  this  people 
had  a  power  of  making  Nimrod  king,  or  he  could 
never  have  been  king.  He  could  not  be  king  by 
fucceflion,  for  the  fcripture  fliews  him  to  havg 
been  the  firft.  He  was  not  king  by  the  right  of 
father,  for  he  was  not  their  father,  Chufh,  Cham, 
with  his  elder  brothers  and  father  Noah  being  ftill 
living  ;  and,  which  is  v/orft  of  all,  were  not  kings : 
for  if  they  v/ho  lived  in  Nimrod's  time,  or  before 
him,  neither  were  kings  nor  had  kings,  he  that 
ought  to  have  been  king  over  all  by  the  right  of 
nature  (if  there  had  been  any  fuch  thing  in  nature) 
was  not  king.  Thofe  who  immediately  fucceeded 
him,  and  muft  have  inherited  his  right,  if  he  had 
any,  did  not  inherit  or  pretend  to  it :  and  therefore 
he  that  Ihall  now  claim  a  right  from  nature,  as  father 
of  a  people,  muft  ground  it  upon  fomething  more 
certain  than  Noah's  right  of  reigning  over  his  chiU 
dren,  or  it  can  have  no  ftrength  in  it. 

Moreover,  the  nations  who  in  and  before  the  time 
of  Nimrod  had  jio  kings,  had  power,  or  elfe  they 
could  have  performed  no  adt,  nor  conftituted  any 
other  magi  il rate  to  this  day,  w^hich  is  abfurd.  There 
was  therefore  a  power  in  nations  before  there  were 
kings,  or  there  could  never  have  been  any  y  and 
Nimrod  could  never  have  been  king,  if  the  people 
of  Babylon  had  not  made  him  king,  which  they 
could  not  have  done  if  they  had  not  had  a  power  of 
making  him  fo.  'Tis  ridiculous  to  fay  he  made 
himfelf  king,  for  tho'  he  might  be  ftrong  and  va- 
liant, he  could  not  be  ftron^er  than  a  multitude  of 
men.  That  which  forces  muft  be  ftronger  than  that 
which  is  forced  ;  and  if  it  be  true,  according  to  the 
antient  faying,  that  Hercules  himfelf  is  not  fufficient 
to  encounter  two,  'tis  fure  more  impofiible  for  one 

man 


Sea.  25.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      209 

man  to  force  a  multitude,  for  that  mufl  be  flrong- 
er  than  he.  If  he  came  in  by  perfuafion,  they  who 
v/ere  pcrfuadcd,  v/ere  perfuaded  to  confent  -that  he 
fliouid  be  kino;.  That  confent  therefore  made  him 
king.  Butj  **  Qui  dat  c&,  dat  modum  ejQc:"  They 
who  made  him  king,  made  him  fuch  a  Icing  as  beft 
pleafed  tliemfeives.  He  had  therefore  nothing  but 
v/hat  was  given :  his  greatnefs  and  power  mull  be 
from  the  multitude  who  gave  it :  and  their  laws 
and  liberties  could  not  be  from  him :  but  their  li- 
berties were  naturally  inherent  in  themfelveSj  and 
their  laws  were  the  produd:  of  them. 

There  was  a  people  that  made  Romulus  king. 
He  did  not  make  or  beget  that  people,  nor,  for  any 
thing  we  know,  one  man  of  them.  He  could  not 
come  in  by  inheritance,  for  he  vras  a  bafiard,  the 
fon  of  an  unknown  man ;  and  when  he  died,  the 
riffht  that  had  been  conferred  uDon  him  reverted  to 
the  people,  v/ho  according  to  that  right,  cbofe  Nu- 
ma,  rioflilius,  Martins,  Tarquinius  Prifcus,  and  Ser- 
vius,  all  ftrano-ers,  and  without  anv  other  rie;ht  than 
what  was  beftow'd  upon  them  :  and  Tarquinius  Su~ 
perbus  who  invaded  the  throne  ^  ''  without  the 
""  com.mand  of  the  people,"  was  ejeckd,  and  the 
governm.ent  of  kings  abolifiicd  by  the  fame  pov/er 
that  had  created  it. 

We  know  not  certainly  by  what  lav/  Mcfes  ar.d 
the  judges  created  by  the  advice  of  Jethro,  govern- 
ed the  Ifraelites ;  but  may  probxbbf  cor.yt6.ure  it  to 
have  been  by  that  law  which  God  had  written  in 
the  hearts  of  mankind ;  and  the  people  fubmitted 
to  the  judgment  of  good  and  wife  men,  tho'  they 
were  under  no  coercive  power  :  but  'tis  certain  they 
had  a  law  and  a  regular  magiftracy  under  v/hich  they 
lived,  four  hundred  years  before  they  had  a  king, 

*  Sine  lufifn  populi.     T.  Li-j,  l.  r. 

Vol,  II.  P  ibr 


216  DISCOURSES       Chap.  IIj 

for  Saul  was  the  firft.  This  law  was  not  therefore  from 
the  king,  nor  by  the  king  5  but  the  king  was  chofea 
and  made  by  the  people,  according  to  the  liberty 
they  had  by  the  law^  tho'  they  did  not  rightly  foU 
low  the  rules  therein  prefcribed,  and  by  that  means 
brought  deftrudtion  upon  themfelves. 

The  country  in  which  we  live  lay  long  concealed 
under  obfcure  barbarity,  and  we  know  nothing  of 
the  firft  inhabitants,  but  what  is  involved  in  fables 
that  leave  us  ftill  in  the  dark.  Julius  Caefar  is  the 
firft  who  fpeaks  diftindlly  of  our  affairs,  and  gives  us 
no  reafon  to  believe  there  was  any  monarchy  thenefta- 
biiifhed  amongft  us.  Caflivellaunus  was  occafionally 
chofen  by  the  nations  that  were  moft  expofed  to  the 
violence  of  the  Romans,*  for  the  management  of  thofe 
wars  againft  them.  By  others  we  hear  of  Boadicia, 
Arviragus,  Galgacus,  and  many  more  fet  up  after- 
wards when  need  required  5  but  we  find  no  foot- 
fteps  of  a  regular  fucceflion  either  by  inheritance  or 
election.  And  as  they  had  then  no  kings,  or  any 
other  general  magiftrate,  that  can  be  faid  to  be 
equivalent  to  a  king,  they  might  have  had  none  at 
all  unlefs  they  had  thought  fit.  Tacitus  mentions 
a  fort  of  kings,  ufed  by  the  Romans  to  keep  -j-  na- 
tions in  fervitude  to  them  5  and  tho'  it  were  true 
that  there  had  been  fuch  a  man  as  Lucius,  and 
he  one  of  this  fort,  he  is  to  be  accounted  only  as  a 
Roman  magiftrate,  and  fignifies  no  more  to  our  dif- 
pute,  than  if  he  had  been  called  proconful,  praetor, 
or  by  any  other  name.  However  there  was  no  feries 
of  them :  that  which  was  temporary  and  occafional, 
depended  upon  the  will  of  thofe,  who  thinking 
there  was  occafion,  created  fuch  a  magiftrate,  and 

*  Jul.  Csef.  comment.  /.  5. 
•\  Inter  inltrumenta  fervitutis  reges  habuere.     C.  Tacif. 

omitted 


Sea.  25.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      211 

omitted  to  do  fo,  when  the  occafion  ceafed,  or  was 
thought  to  ceafe  -,  and  might  have  had  none  at  all, 
if  they  had  fo  pleafed.  The  magiftracy  therefore 
was  from  them,  and  depended  upon  their  will. 

We  have  already  mentioned  the  hiftories  of  the 
Saxons,  Danes  and  Normans,  from  which  nations, 
together  with  the  Britons,  we  are  defcended,  and 
finding  that  they  were  fevere  affertors  of  their  liber- 
ties, acknowledged  no  human  lavv^s  but  their  own, 
received  no  kings  but  fuch  as  fwore  to  obferve  them, 
and  depofed  thofe  who  did  not  well  perform  their 
oaths  and  duty,  'tis  evident  that  their  kings  were 
made  by  the  people  according  to  the  law  ;  and  that 
the  law,  by  which  they  became  \\  hat  they  were, 
could  not  be  from  themfelves.  Our  anceftors  were 
fo  fully  convinced  that  in  the  creation  of  kings  they 
exercifed  their  own  right,  and  were  only  to  confider 
what  was  good  for  themfelves  that  without  regard 
to  the  memory  of  thofe  who  had  gone  before,  they 
were  accuftomed  to  take  fuch  as  feemed  mod  li'  e, 
wifely,  juftly  and  gently  to  perform  their  office^  refuf- 
ed  thofe  that  were  fufpecSled  of  pride,  cruelty,  or  any 
other  vice  that  might  bring  prejudice  upon  the  pub- 
lic, what  title  foever  they  pretended  ;  and  removed 
fuch  as  had  been  placed  in  the  throne,  if  they  did 
not  anfwer  the  opinion  conceived  of  their  virtue ; 
which  I  take  to  be  a  manner  of  proceeding  that 
agrees  better  with  the  quality  of  mailers,  making 
laws  and  magiflrates  for  themfelves,  than  of  flaves 
receiving  fuch  as  were  impofed  upon  them. 

2.  To  the  fecond.  Tho'  it  fhould  be  granted^ 
that  all  nations  had  at  the  firft  been  governed  by  kings, 
It  were  nothing  to  the  queftion  5  for  no  man  or 
number  of  men  was  ever  oblig-ed  to  continue  in  the 
errors  of  his  predeceiSbrs.  The  authority  of  cuftom 
as  well  a^^  of  law  (I  mean  in  relation  to  the  power 

P  2  that 


** 


212  DISCOURSES         Chap,  til, 

that  made  it  to  be)  confifls  only  la  its  redlitude :  and 
the  fame  realbn  which  may  have  induced  one  or  more 
nations  to  create  kings,  when  they  knew  no  other 
form  of  government,  may  not  only  induce  them  to 
ict  up  another,  if  that  be  found  inconvenient  to  them, 
but  proves  mat  they  may  as  juftly  do  fo,  as  remove 
a  man,  who  perform.s  not  what  was  expected  from 
him.  If  there  had  been  a  rule  given  by  God,  and 
written  in  tlie  minds  of  men  by  nature,  it  muft  have 
been  from  the  beginning,  univerfal  and  perpetual  3  or 
at  leaft  niuil  have  been  obferved  by  the  wifell  and 
beft  inftrudled  nations :  which  not  being  in  any 
meafure  (as  I  have  proved  ah'eady)  there  can  be  no 
realbn,  why  a  pohte  people  fl:iould  not  relinquifli  the 
errors  committed  by  their  anceftors  in  the  time  of 
their  barbarifm  and  ignorance,  and  why  they  fhould 
not  do  it  in  matters  of  government,  as  well  as  in 
any  other  thing  relating  to  life.  Men  are  fubjedt  to 
errors,  and  'tis  thje  work  of  the  beft  and  wifeft  to 
difcover  and  am^end  fuch  as  their  anceftors  m.av  have 
committed,  or  to  add  perfedion  to  thofe  things  which 
by  them  have  b«^en  well  invented.  This  is  fo  certain, 
that  whatfoever  wo  enjoy  beyond  the  mifery  in  which 
our  barbarous  an ceftors  lived,  is  due  only  to  the  liberty 
of  correding  what  Vv^as  amifs  in  their  pracStice,  or  in- 
venting that  which  they  did  not  know  :  and  I  doubt 
whether  it  be  more  brutifta  to  fay  we  are  obliged  to 
continue  in  the  idolatry  of  the  Druids,  v/ith  all  the 
miferies  and  follies  that  accompany  the  m.oft  favage 
barbarity,  or  to  confefs  that  tho'  we  have  a  right  to 
depart  from  thefe,  yet  we  are  for  ever  bound  to  con- 
tinue the  government  they  had  eftablifhed,  what- 
ever inconveniencies  miight  attend  it.  Tertullian 
difputing  with  the  Pagans,  who  objected  the  no- 
velty of  tlie  chriftian  religion,  troubled  not  himfelf 
s  2  with 


Sea.  25-  CONCERNING  GOVERNxMENT.      2t- 

with  refuting  that  error  ;  ^'  hut  proving  chriftianity 
to  be  good  and  true,  he  thought  h.e  had  fufliciently 
proved  it  to  be  antient.  A  wife  archited  may  flicw 
his  fkiil,  and  defervc  commendation  for  building  a 
poor  houfe  of  vile  materials,  vvlien  he  can  procure 
no  better,  but  he  no  way  ought  to  hinder  others  from 
eredting  more  glorious  fabrics,  if  they  are  furniflx^d 
with  the  means  required,  Befides,  fuch  is  the  im- 
perfection of  all  human  conilitations,  that  they  are 
fubjedl  to  perpetual  fluduation,  which  never  permits 
them  to  continue  long  in  the  fame  condition  :  cor- 
ruptions Hide  in  infenfibly  ;  and  the  bed  orders  are 
fometimes  fubverted  by  malice  and  violence  ;  fo  that 
he  who  only  regards  what  was  done  in  fuch  an  age, 
often  takes  the  corruption  of  the  ftate  for  the  inftitu-" 
tion,  follows  the  worft  example,  thinks  that  to  be 
the  firft,  that  is  the  mofl  antient  he  knows  j  and  if  a 
brave  people  feeing  the  original  defeds  of  their 
government,  or  the  corruption  into  which  itrTiay  be 
fallen,  do  either  corred  and  reform  what  may  be 
amended,  or  abolifh  that  w^hich  was  evil  in  the 
inftitution,  or  fo  perverted  that  it  cannot  be  refcor'd 
to  inteeritv,  thefe  men  impute  it  to  fedition,  and 
blame  thofe  adions,  which  of  all  that  can  be  per- 
formed by  men  are  the  m.ofl;  glorious.  We  are  not 
therefore  fo  much  to  inquire  after  that  which  is  moit 
antient,  as  that  w^hich  is  beft,  and  m.of!:  conducing  to 
the  good  ends  to  which  it  was  direded.  As  govern- 
ments were  inftil'uted  for  the  obtaining:  of  iuftice, 
and  (as  our  author  fays)  the  prefcrvation  of  liberty,. 
we  are  not  to  ftek  wdiat  government  was  the  fni\^ 
but  what  belt  provides  for  the  obtaining  of  jufi.icc, 
and  prefcrvation  of  liberty.  For  v/hatfoevcr  the 
inftitution  be,  and  how  long  foever  it  may  have  lafled, 

•« 

*  Null  am  tempus,  nulla  praslcriptip  ocean  it  vjritati.   Tcrtiil.     Id 
antic]uius  quod  verius.    Ibid. 

P  3  Ni's 


214  DISCOURSES        Chap.  lit 

'tis  void,  if  it  thwarts,  or  do  not  provide,  for  the  ends 
of  its  eilablifhment.  If  fach  a  law  or  cuftom  there* 
fore  as  is  not  good  in  it  felf,  had  in  the  beginning 
prevailed  in  all  parts  of  the  world  (which  in  relation 
to  abfolute  or  any  kind  of  monarchy  is  not  true)  it 
ought  to  be  abolillied ;  and  if  any  man  fhould  fhew 
himfelf  wifer  than  others  by  propofing  a  law  or 
government,  more  beneficial  to  mankind  than  any 
that  had  been  formerly  known,  providing  better  for 
juftice  and  liberty  than  all  others  had  done,  he 
would  merit  the  higheft  veneration.  If  any  man  afk, 
who  fliall  be  judge  of  that  rectitude  or  pravity 
which  either  authorifes  or  deftroys  a  law  ?  I  anfwer, 
that  as  this  confifts  not  in  formalities  and  niceties,  but 
in  evident  and  fubftantial  truths,  there  is  no  need 
of  any  other  tribunal  than  that  of  common  fenfe, 
and  the  light  of  nature,  to  determine  the  matter: 
and  he  that  travels  through  France,  Italy,  Turky, 
Germany  and  Switzerland  without  confulting  Bar- 
tolus  or  Baldus,  will  ealily  underfland  whether 
the  countries  that  are  under  the  kings  of  France  an4 
Spain,  the  Pope  and  the  great  Turk,  or  fuch  as  ar§ 
under  the  care  of  a  well-regulated  magiftracy,  do 
beft  enjoy  the  benefits  of  juftice  and  liberty.  ' Tis  as 
eafily  determined,  whether  the  Grecians  when  Athens 
and  Thebes  flourifhed  were  more  free  than  the  Medesj 
whether  juftice  was  better  adminiftred  by  Agathocles^ 
Dionyfius  and  Phalaris,  than  by  the  legal  kings  and 
regular  magiftrates  of  Sparta  3  or  whether  more  care 
was  taken  that  juftice  and  liberty  might  be  preferved 
by  Tiberius,  Caligula,  Claudius,  Nero  and  Vitellius, 
than  by  the  fenate  and  people  of  Rome  whilft  the 
lav/s  WTre  more  powerful  than  the  commands  of 
men.  The  like  may  be  faid  of  particular  laws,  as 
thofe  ofNabuchodonofor  and  Caligula,  for  worfliip- 
ing  their  ftatues  y    our  afts  of  parliament   againft 

heretics 


Sea  25.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     215 

heretics  and  lollards,  with  the  ftatutes  and  orders 
of  the  inquifition  which  is  called  the  holy  office. 
And  if  that  only  be  a  law  which  is  "  Sandtio  reda, 
"  jubens  honefta,  prohibens  contraria,"  the  meanefl 
iinderftanding,  if  free  from  paflion,  may  certainly 
know  that  fuch  as  thefe  cannot  be  laws^  by  what 
authority  foever  they  were  enabled,  and  that  the  ufe 
of  them,  and  others  like  to  them,  ought  to  be 
abolifhed  for  their  turpitude  and  iniquity.  Infinite 
examples  of  the  like  nature  might  be  alledged,  as 
well  concerning  divine  as  human  things.  And  if 
there  be  any  laws  v/hich  are  evil,  there  cannot  be  an 
inconteftable  redlitude  in  all,  and  if  not  in  all,  it 
concerns  us  to  examine  where  it  is  to  be  found. 
Laws  and  conftitutions  ought  to  be  weighed,  and 
whilil:  all  due  reverence  is  paid  to  fuch  as  are  good, 
every  nation  may  not  only  retain  in  it  felf  a  power 
of  changing,  or  abolifliing  all  fuch  as  are  not  fo, 
but  ought  to  exercife  that  power  according  to  the 
beft  of  their  underflanding,  and  in  the  place  of 
what  was  either  at  fir  ft  miftaken  or  after  w^ards  cor- 
rupted, to  conftitute  that  which  is  m.oft  conducing 
to  the  eftablifhment  of  juftice  and  liberty. 

But  fuch  is  the  condition  of  mankind,  that  nothing 
can  be  fo  perfectly  framed  as  not  to  give  fome  tefti- 
mony  of  hum^an  imbecility,  and  frequently  to  ftand 
in  need  of  reparations  and  amendments.  Many 
things  are  unknown  to  the  wifeft,  and  the  beft  men 
can  never  wholly  diveft  themfelves  of  paflions 
and  affeilions.  By  this  means  the  beO  and  wifeft 
are  fometimes  led  into  error,  and  ftand  in  need  of 
fuccefTors  like  to  themfelves,  who  may  find  remedies 
for  the  faults  they  have  committed,  and  nothing  can 
or  ought  to  be  permanent  but  that  which  is  perfed:. 
No  natural  body  was  ever  fo  well  temper'd  and 
organiz'd,  as  not  to  be  fubjedl  to  difeafes,  wounds 
or  other  accidents,  and  to  need  medicines  and  other 

P  4  ^         occafional 


2i6  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

occafionai  helps  as  well  as  noiiriiliment  and  exercife; 
and  he  who  under  the  name  of  innovation  would 
deprive  nations  of  the  like,  does,  as  much  as  lies  In 
hinni,  condemn  tbem  all  to  perifli  by  the  defedts  of 
their  own  foundations.  Some  men  obfervinf^  this  *,- 
have  propofed  a  neceflily  of  reaucing  eVery  ftate  once 
in  an  age  or  two,  to  the  integrity  of  its  iir(t  principle : 
but  they  ought  to  have  examined,  whether  that 
principle  be  good  or  evil,  or  fo  good  that  nothing 
can  be  added  to  it,  which  none  ever  was  ;  and  this 
beino;  fo,  thofe  who  will  admit  of  no  change  would 
render  errors  perpetital,  and  depriving  mankind  of 
the  benefits  of  wifdom,  induftry,  experience,  and 
the  right  ule  of  r^afon,  oblige  all  to  continue  in 
the  miiferable  barbarity  of  their  anceftors,  which 
fuits  better  with  the  name  of  a  w^olf  than  tliat  of  a 
man. 

Thofe  who  are  of  better  underftanding,  weigh  all 
things,  and  often  find  reafcn  to  abrogate  that  Vv^hich 
their  fathers,  according  to  the  meafure  of  the  know- 
ledge they  had,  or  the  fcate  of  things  among  them, 
had  rightly  inftituted,  or  to  reilore  that  which  they 
had  abroi^ated  ;  and  there  can  be  no  f^reater  m.ark''6f 
a  m.oi  brutifii  ilupidity,  than  for  men  to  continue 
in  an  evil  v^^ay,  becaufe  their  fathers  had  brought 
them  into  it.  But  if  we  ought  not  too  ll  ridly  to 
adhere  to  our  own  coniUtutions,  thofe  of  other  nati* 
ons  are  Icfs  to  be  regarded  by  us  -,  for  the,  law^s  that 
may  be  good  for  one  people  are  not  for  all,  and  that 
which  agrees  wiih  thenianhers  of  one  age,  is  utterly 
abhorrent  from  thofe  of  another.  It  wereabfurd  to 
think  of  reftorine  the  laws  of  Lycuri;^us  to  the  pre- 
fcnt  inhabitants  of  Peloponncfus,  who  are  accuftomed 
to  the  moft  abjed;  ilavcry.  It  may  eafily  be  imagined, 
how  the  Romans,  Sabines  and  Latins,  now  under  the 

*  Difcori".  di  Macchiav.  //^.  a. 

tyranny 


Sea.  25.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    217 

tyranny  of  the  pope,  would  reUfh  ilich  a  dilcipline 
as  flouridied  amon9;  them  after  the  expulfion  of  the 
Tarquins ;  and  it  had  been  no  lefs  prepoftcrous  to 
give  a  liberty  to  the  Parthians  of  governing  them- 
felves,  or  for  them  to  affume  it,  than  to  impofe  an 
abfolute  monarch  upon  the  German  nation.    Titus 
Livius  having  obferved  this,  fays  ^,  that  if  a  popular 
government  had  been  fet  up  in  Rome   immediately 
upon  the  building   of  the  city ;  and   if  that  fierce 
people  which  was  compofed   of  unruly  fliepherds, 
lierdfrnen,  fugitive  flaves,  and  outlawed  perfons,  who 
-could  not  fuffer  the  governments  under  which  they 
Vv'crc  born,  had  come  to  be  incited   by  turbulent 
orators,  they  would  have  brought  all  into  confufion : 
whereas    that  boifterous   humour   being  gradually 
tcm-per'd  by  difcipline  under  Rom^ulus,  or  taught 
to  vent  its  furv  aeainft  foreign  enemies,  and  foften'd 
by  the  peaceable  reign  of  Num^a,  a  new  race  grew 
up,  which  being  all  of  one  blood,  contracted  a  love 
to  their  country,    and  became  capable  of  liberty, 
which  the  miadnefs  of  their  laftking,  and  thelewd- 
nefs  of  his  fon,  gave  them  occaiion  to  reflime.     If 
this  was   commendable  in  them,  it  mufi:  be  fo  in 
o  her  nations.       If  the  Germans    might   preferve 
their  liberty,  as  well  as  the  Parthians 'fubmitthem- 
felves  to  abfolute  monarchy,  ^tis  as  lawful  for  the 
defcendants    of  thofe  Germ_ans   to    continue    in   it, 
as  for  the  eaftern  nations  to  be  Haves.     If  one  nation 
may  juftly  choofe  the  government  that  feems  belt  to 
them,    and  continue   or  alter  it   according  to   the 
changes  of  times  and  things,  the  fam.e  right  m.uft 
belono;  to  others.     The  2:reat  variety  of  lav/s  that  are 
or  have  been  in  the  v/orld,  proceeds  from  this,  and 
nothing  can  better  fhew  the  w^ifdom  and  virtue,  or 

^  HiiK  L.  2. 

the 


2iS  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

the  vices  and  folly  of  nations,  than  the  ufe  they 
make  of  this  right :  they  have  been  glorious  or  infa- 
mous, powerful  or  defpicable,  happy  or  miferable, 
as  they  have  well  or  ill  executed  it. 

If  it  be  faid  that  the  law  given  by  God  to  the 
Hebrews,  proceeding  from  his  wifdom  and  good- 
riefs,    muft  needs  be  perfed:  and  obligatory  to  all 
nations  :  I  anfwer,  that  there  is  a  iimple  and  a  rela- 
tive perfedlion  ;  the  firft  is  only  in  God,  the  other 
in  the  things  he  has  created  :  *  "  he  faw  that  they 
^'  were  good,"  which  can  fignify  no  more  than  that 
they  were  good  in  their  kind,  and  fuited  to  the  end 
for  which  he  defigned  them.     For  if  the  perfed:ion 
were  abfolute,  there  could  be  no  difference  between 
an  angel  and  a  worm,  and  nothing  could  be  fubjefl: 
to  change  or  death,  for  that  is  imperfedlion.     This 
relative  perfeftion  is  {ccn  alfo  by  his  law  given  to 
mankind  in  the  perfons  of  Adam  and  Noah.     It 
was  good  in  the  kind,  fit  for  thofe  times,  but  could 
never  have  been  enlarged  or  altered,  if  the  perfedlion 
had  been  fimple ;  and  no  better  evidence  can  be 
given  to  fliew  that  it  was  not  fo,  than  that  God  did 
afterwards  give  one  much  more  full  and  explicit  to 
his  people.  This  law  alfo  was  peculiarly  apphcable  to 
that  people  and  feafon,  for  if  it  had  been  otherwife, 
the  apOilles  would  have  obliged  chriftians  to  the  in- 
tire  obfervation  of  it,  as  well  as  to  abflain  from  ido^ 
latry,  fornication  and  blood.     But  if  all  this  be  not 
fo,  then  their  judicial  law,    and  the  form  of  their 
commonwealth  muft  be  received  by  all ;  no  human 
law  can  be  of  any  value;  we  are  all  brethren,  no 
man  has  a  prerogative  above  another ;  lands  muft  be 
equally  divided  amongft  all ;  inheritances  cannot  be 
alienated  for  above  fifty  years ;  no  man  can  be  raifed 
above  the  reft  unlefs  he  be  called  by  God^  and  en- 

^  Gen.  i. 

abled 


Sea.  2  5.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      219 

abled  by  his  fpirit  to  conduct  the  people;  when 
this  man  dies,  he  that  has  the  fame  fpirit  muft  fuc- 
ceed,  as  Jofliua  did  to  Mofes,  and  his  children  can 
have  no  title  to  bis  office  :  when  fach  a  man  appears, 
a  Sanhedrin  of  feventy  men  chofen  out  of  the  whole 
people,  are  to  judge  fuch  caufes  as  relate  to  them- 
felves,  whilft  thofe  of  greater  extent  and  importance 
^re  referred  to  the  general  aflemblies.     Here  is  no 
mention  of  a  king,  and  confequently,  if  we  muft 
take  this  law  for  our  pattern,  we  cannot  have  one  : 
if  the  point  be  driven  to  the  utmoft,  and  the  pre- 
cept of  Deuteronomy,  where  God  permitted  them 
to  have  a  king,  if  they  thought  fit,  when  they  came 
into  the  promifed  land,  be  underftood  to  extend  to- 
all  nations,  every  one  of  them  muft  have  the  fame  li- 
berty of  taking  their  own  time,  choofing  him  in  their 
own  way,  dividing  the  kingdom,  having  no  king, 
and  fetting  up  other  governors  when  they  pleafe, 
as  before  the  election  of  Saul,  and  after  the  return 
from  the  captivity  :  and  even  when  they  have  a  king, 
he  muft  be  fuch  an  one  as  is  defcribed  in  the  fame 
chapter,  who  no  more  refembles  the  fovereign  ma- 
jefty  that  our  author  adores,  and  agrees  as  little  with 
his  maxims,  as  a  tribune  of  the  Roman  people. 

We  may  therefore  conclude,  that  if  we  are  to 
follow  the  law  of  Mofes,  we  muft  take  it  v/ith  all 
the  appendages  ;  a  king  can  be  no  more,  and  no 
other  wife  than  lie  makes  him  :  for  whatever  we 
read  of  the  kings  they  had,  were  extreme  deviations 
from  it.  No  nation  can  make  any  lavv^,  and  our 
lawyers  burning  their  books  may  betake  themfelves 
to  the  ftudy  of  the  pentateuch,  in  which  tho'  fome 
of  them  may  be  well  verfed,  yet  probably  the  pro- 
fit arifing  from  thence  will  not  be  very  great. 

But  if  we  are  not  obliged  to  live  in  a  conformity 
to  the  lav/  of  Mofes^  every  people  may  frame  laws 

for 


220  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

for  themfelves,  and  we  cannot  be  denied  the  right 
that  is  coinmon  to  all.  Oar  laws  were  not  fent 
from  heaven,  bat  made  by  our  anceftors  according 
to  the^  light  they  had,  and  their  prefent  occafions. 
We  inherit  the  fame  right  from  them,  and,  as  we 
may  without  vanity  fay  that  v/e  knov/  a  little  more 
than  they  did,  if  we  find  ourfelves  prejudic'd  by  any 
law  that  they  made,  we  may  repeal  it.  The  fafety 
of  the  people  was  their  fupreme  law,  and  is  fo  to 
us  :  neither  can  we  be  thought  lefs  fit  to  judge  what 
conduces  to  that  end,  than  they  were.  If  they  in 
any  age  had  been  perfuaded  to  put  them.felves  under 
the  power,  or  in  our  author's  phrafe,  under  the  fo-  - 
vereign  majefly  of  a  child,  a  fool,  a  mad  or  defpe- 
rately  wicked  perfon,  and  had  annexed  the  right 
conferred  upon  him  to  fuch  as  fliould  fucceed,  it 
had  not  been  a  '' juft  and  right  faiidtion  ;"  and  hav- 
ing none  of  the  qualities  effentially  belonging  to  a 
law,  could  not  have  the  effed:  of  a  law.  It  cannpt 
be  for  the  good  of  a  people  to  be  governed  by  one, 
who  by  nature  ought  to  be  governed,  or  by  age  or 
accident  is  rendred  unable  to  govern  himfelf.  The 
public  interefts  and  the  concernments  of  private  men 
in  their  lands,  goods,  liberties  and  lives  (for  the  pre- 
fervation  of  which  our  author  fays,  that  regal  pre- 
rogative is  only  confatuted)  cannot  be  preferved  by 
one  who  is  tranfported  by  his  own  paffions  or  follies, 
a  flave  to  his  lufls  and  vices ;  or,  which  is  fome- 
times  worfe,  governed  by  the  vileft  of  men  and 
women  who  flatter  him  in  them,  and  pufh  him  on 
to  do  fuch  things  as  even  they  would  abhor,  if  they 
were  in  his  place.  The  turpitude  and  impious  mad- 
nefs  of  fuch  an  ad:  mull:  neceffarily  make  it  void, 
by  overthrowing  the  ends  for  which  it  w^as  made, 
fince  that  juftice  which  was  fought  cannot  be  obtain- 
ed, nor  the  evils  that  wxre  feared,  prevented  3  and 

they 


Sea.  2  6.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      221 

they  for  whofe  good  it  was  intended  muft  neceffari- 
\y  have  a  right  of  abolifliing  it.  This  might  be  fuf- 
ficient  for  us,  tho'  our  anceftors  had  enflaved  them- 
felves.  But,  God  be  thanked,  we  are  not  put  to 
that  trouble :  we  have  no  reafon  to  beHeve  we  are 
dcfcended  from  fuch  fools  and  beafts,  as  would  will- 
insily  cafl  themfelves  and  us  into  fuch  an  excefs  of 
mifery  and  fhame,  or  that  they  were  fo  tame  and 
cowardly  to  be  fubjecled  by  force  or  fear.  We  know 
the  value  they  fet  upon  their  liberties,  and  the  cou- 
rage with  which  they  defended  them :  and  we  can 
have  no  better  example  to  encoura5;e  us,  never  to 
fufFer  them  to  be  violated  or  diminiflied. 

SECT.      XXVI. 

Tho'  the  king  may  be  entriijled  with  the  power  of 
choojing  judges^  yet  that  by  which  they  acf  is  from 
the  law, 

IConfefs  that  no  law  can  be  fo  perfed:,  *^  to  pro- 
"  vide  exadlly  for  every  cafe  that  may  fall  out, 
*^  fo  as  to  leave  nothing  to  the  difcretion  of  the 
*'  judges,'*  who  in  fome  meafure  are  to  inter- 
pret them  :  but  "  that  lav/s  or  cuftoms  are  ever  few, 
"  or  that  the  paucity  is  the  reafon  that  they  cannot 
"  give  fpecial  rules,  or  that  judges  do  refort  to  thofe 
"  principles  or  common  law  axioms,  whereupon 
"  former  judgments  in  cafes  fom.ething  alike  have 
"  been  given  by  former  judges,  who  all  receive  their 
"  authority  from  the  king  in  his  right  to  give 
"  fentence,"  I  utterly  deny;  and  affirm, 

1 .  That  in  many  places,  and  particularly  in  Eng- 
land, the  laws  are  fo  many,  that  the  number  of 
them  has  introduced  an  uncertainty  and  confufion 
which  is  both  dangerous  and  troublefome  ;  and  the 
infinite  variety  of  adjudged  cafes  thw^arting  and  con- 
tradicting 


222  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

tradiding  each  other,  has  rendred  thefe  difficulties 
inextricable.  Tacitus  imputes  a  great  part  of  the 
miferies  fuffer'd  by  the  Romans  in  his  time  to  this 
abufe,  and  tells  us,  that  "  the  laws  grew  to  be  innu- 
"  merable  in  the  worft  and  moft  corrupt  ftate  of 
**  things"*,"  and  that  juflice  was  overthrown  by 
them.  By  the  fame  means  in  France,  Italy,  and 
other  places,  where  the  civil  law  is  rendred  muni- 
cipal, judgments  are  in  a  manner  arbitrary ;  and 
tho'  the  intention  of  our  laws  be  juft  and  good,  they 
are  fo  numerous,  and  the  volumes  of  our  ftatutes 
with  the  interpretations  and  adjudged  cafes  fo  vaft, 
that  hardly  any  thing  is  fo  clear  and  fixed,  but  men 
of  wit  and  learning  may  find  what  will  ferve  for  a 
pretence  to  juftify  almoft  any  judgment  they  have  a 
mind  to  give.  Whereas  the  laws  of  Mofes,  as  to 
the  judicial  part,  being  fhort  and  few,  judgments 
were  eafy  and  certain  ;  and  in  Switzerland,  Sweden, 
and  fome  parts  of  Denmark,  the  whole  volume  that 
contains  them  may  be  read  in  few  hours,  and  by  that 
means  no  injufi:ice  can  be  done  which  is  not  immedi- 
ately made  evident. 

2.  Axioms  are  not  rightly  grounded  upon  judged 
cafes,  but  cafes  are  to  be  judged  according  to  axioms : 
the  certain  is  not  proved  by  the  uncertain,  but  the 
uncertain  by  the  certain ;  and  every  thing  is  to 
be  efleemed  uncertain  till  it  be  proved  to  be  certain. 
Axioms  in  law  are,  as  in  mathematics,  evident  to 
common  fenfe  ;  and  nothing  is  to  be  taken  for  an 
axiom,  that  is  not  fo.  Euclid  does  not  prove  his 
axioms  by  his  propofitions,  but  his  propofitions, 
which  are  abftrufe,  by  fuch  axioms  as  are  evident  to 
all.  The  axioms  of  our  law  do  not  receive  their 
authority  from  Coke  or  Hales,  but  Coke  and  Hales 

*  Et  in  corruptifllma  Republica  plurimx  Leges. 

deferve^ 


Sea.  26.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     123, 

deferve  praife  for  giving  judgment  according  to  fuchr 
as  are  undeniably  true. 

3 .  The  judges  receive  their  commiffions  from  the 
king,  and  perhaps  it  may  be  faid,  that  the  cuftom  of 
naming  them  is  grounded  upon  a  right  v^ith  which 
he  is  entrufted  >  but  their  power  is  from  the  law,  as 
that  of  the  king   alfo  is.     For  he  who  has  none 
originally  in  himfelf,  can  give  none  unlefs  it  be  firft 
conferred  upon  him.     I  know  not  how  he  can  well 
perform  his  oath  to  govern  according  to  law,   unlefs 
he  execute  the  power  with  which  he  is  entrufted,  in 
naming  thofe  men  to  be  judges,  whom  in  his  con- 
fcience,  and  by  the  advice  of  his  council,  he  thinks 
the  beft  and  ableft  to  perform  that  office  :  but  both 
he  and  they  are  to  learn  their  duty  from  that  law, 
by  which  they  are,  and  which  allots  to  every  one  his. 
proper  work.     As  the  law  intends  that  men  flhould 
be  made  judges  for  their  integrity  and  knowledge  in 
the  law,  and  that  it  ought  not  to  be  imagined  that 
the  king  will  break  his  truft  by  choofing  fuch  as  are 
not  fo,  till  the  violation  be  evident,  nothing  is  more 
reafonable  than  to  intend  that  the  judges  fo  qualified 
fhould  inftrud:  the  king  in  matters  of  law.     But 
that  he  who  may  be  a  child,  over  aged,  or  otherwife 
ignorant  and  incapable,  fliould  inlSrudl  the  judges, 
is  equally  abfurd,  as  for  a  blind  man  to  be  a  guide  to 
thofe  who  have  the  beft  eyes,  and  fo  abhorrent  from 
,  the  meaning  of  the  law,  that  the  judges   (as  I  faid 
before)  are  fworn  to  do  juftice  according  to  the  laws, 
without  any  regard  to  the  king's  words,  letters  or 
commands  :   if  they  are  therefore  to  adl  according  to 
a  fet  rule,  from  which  they  may  not  depart  what 
command  foever  they  receive,  they  do  not  adt  by  a 
power  from  him,  but  by  one  that  is  above  both. 
This  is  commonly  confefs'd  ;  and  tho'  fome  judges 
have  been  found  in  feveral  ages,  who  in  hopes  of 

reward 


224  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

reward  and  preferment  have  made  little  account  of 
their  oath,  yet  the  fuccefs  that  many  of  them  liave 
had,  may  reafonably  deter  others  from  following 
their  example ;  and  if  there  are  not  more  inilances 
in  this  kind,  no  better  reafon  can  be  given,  than 
that  '^  nations  do  fi-equently  fail,  by  being  too  re- 
mifs  in  aif-rtlng  their  own  rights  or  puniihing  of- 
fenders, and  hardly  ever  err  on  the  feverer  Mi^. 

A.,  Judgments  are  variouily  given  in  feveral  ftates 
and  kino-doins,  but  he  who  would  find  one  where 
they  lie  in  the  breail  of  the  king^  muft  go  atieaft  as 
far  as  iVlorocco.  Nay,  the  ambaliador  whowas  lately 
here  from  that  place,  denied  that  they  were  abfo- 
lutely  in  him.  However  'tis  certain  that  in  Eng- 
land, according  to  the  great  charter,  '■'  f  Judgments 
«'  are  paiTed  by  equals :"  no  maan  can  be  imprifoned, 
diffeized  of  his  f-eehold,  deprived  of  life  or  iinib, 
""  X  ^^nlefs  by  the  fentence  of  his  peers."  The  kings 
of  Judah  did  ''  \  judge  and  were  judged;"  and 
the  iudgm.ents  they  gave  were  in  and  with  the  San- 
hedrin/  In  England  the  kings  do  not  judge,  but 
are  judged :  and  Bradon  lays,  ''  §  That  in  rcceiv- 
*'  ing  juftice  the  king  is  equal  to  another  man ;" 
which  could  not  be,  if  judgments  were  ^ given  by 
him,  and  he  w^ere  exem.pted  from  the  judgment  of 
all  by  that  lavv^  which  has  put  all  judgm.cnts  into 
the  hands  of  the  people.  This  power  is  executed 
by  them  in  grand  or  petty  juries,  and  the  judges  are 
affutants  to  them  in  explaining  the  difficult  points 
of  the  law,  in  which  'tis  prefumed  they  fliould  be 
learned.  The  ftrength  of  every  judgment  confiils 
in  the  verdidt  of  thefe  juries,  which  the  judges  do 

*  Jure  igiti^r  pIe<?Jniur  ;  iiiii  enim  multorum  impunita  fcelera  tulii- 
femus,  nunquam  ad  unum  tanta  pervenifict  licentia.     Ciceio. 
t  j-jdicia  fiunt  per  pares.     Mag.    Ch-rt. 


not 


Sea.  26.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      225 

not  give^  but  pronounce  or  declare :  and  the  fame 
law  that  makes  good  a  verdidl  given  contrary  to  the 
advice  or  direction  of  the  judges,  expofes  them  to 
the  utmoft  penalties,  if  upon  their  own  heads,  or  a 
command  from  the  king,  they  fhould  prefume  to 
give  a  fentence,  without  or  contrary  to  a  verdidt  5 
and  no  preteniions  to  a  power  of  interpreting  the 
law  can  exempt  them  if  they  break  it.  The  power 
alfo  with  which  the  judges  are  entrufted^  is  but  of 
a  moderate  extent,  and  to  be  executed  bona  fide, 
prevarications  are  capital,  as  they  proved  to  Trefi- 
llan,  Empfon,  Dudley,  and  many  others.  Nay 
even  in  fpecial  verdidls,  the  judges  are  only  ailiftants 
to  the  juries  who  find  it  fpecially,  and  the  verdid:  is 
from  them,  tho'  the  judges  having  heard  the  point 
argued,  declare  the  fenle  of  the  law"  thereuoon. 
Wherefore  if  I  fliould  grant  that  the  king  might 
perfonally  afiifl  in  judgments,  his  v^ork  could  only 
be  to  prevent  frauds,  and  by  the  advice  of  the  judges 
to.  fee  that  the  laws  be  duly  executed,  or  perhaps  to 
infpeci:  their  behaviour.  If  he  has  more  than  this, 
it  muft  be  by  virtue  of  his  politic  capacity,  in  which 
he  is  underftood  to  be  always  prefent  in  principal 
courts,  where  juftice  is  always  done  whether  he 
who  wears  the  crown  be  young  or  old,  wife  or  ig- 
norant, good  or  bad,  or  whether  he  like  or  diflike 
what  is  done. 

Moreover,  as  governments  are  inflltuted  for  the 
obtaining  of  juftice,  and  the  king  is  in  a  great  mea- 
fure  entrufted  with  the  power  of  executing  it,  'tis 
probable  that  the  lav/  would  have  required  his  pre- 
fence  in  the  diftribution,  if  there  had  been  but  one 
court ;  that  at  the  fame  time  he  could  be  prefent  in 
more  than  one;  that  it  were  certain  he  would  te 
guilty  of  no  mifcarriages  ;  that  all  mifcarriages  were 
to  be  punlfhed  in  him  as  well  as  in  the  judges ;  or 

Vol.  II.  Q_  that 


226  DISCOURSES       Chap.  Hi.' 

that  it  were  certain  he  fhould  always  be  a  man  of 
fuch  wifdom,  induflry,  experience  and  integrity  as 
to  be  an  affiftance  to,  and  a  watch  over  thofe  who 
are  appointed  for  the  adminiflraticn  of  juftice.  But 
there  being  many  courts  fitting  at  the  fame  time  of 
equal  authority,  in  feveral  places  far  diftant  from 
each  other  ^  impoflible  for  the  king  to  be  prefent  in 
all ;  no  manner  of  affurance  that  the  fame  or  greater 
mifcarriages  may  not  be  committed  in  his  prefence 
than  in  his  abfence,  by  himfelf  than  others  -,  no  op- 
portunity of  punifhing  every  delid:  in  him,  with- 
out bringing  the  nation  into  fuch  diforder,  as  may 
be  of  m.ore  prejudice  to  the  public  than  an  injury 
done  to  a  private  man^  the  law  which  intends 
to  obviate  offences,  or  to  punifh  fuch  as  cannot 
be  obviated,  has  direfted,  that  thofe  men  fliould 
be  chofen  w^ho  are  molt  knowing  in  it,  impofes  aa 
oath  upon  them,  not  to  be  diverted  from  die  due 
eourfe  of  juftice  by  fear  or  favour,  hopes  or  reward, 
particularly  by  any  com.mand  from  the  king ;  and 
appoints  the  fevereft  puniihments  for  them  if  they 
prove  falfe  to  God  and  their  country. 

If  any  m.an  think  that  the  words  cited  from  Brac- 
ton  by  our  author  upon  the  queftion,  ^'^  Qujs  prima 
"  &  principaliter  poflit  &  debeat  judicare,  &c.  Sci- 
"  endum  eft  quod  rex  &  non  alius,  fi  folus  ad  hasc 
**  fufficere  poiiit ;  cum  ad  hoc  per  virtutem  facra- 
''  menti  teneatur/'  are  contrary  to  what  I  havefaid, 
J  delire  the  context  may  be  confidered,  that  his  opi- 
nion m^y  be  truly  underftood,  tho'  the  w^ords  taken 
limply  and  nakedly  may  be  enough  for  my  purpofe. 
For  'tis  ridiculous  to  infer  that  the  king  has  a  right 
of  doing  any  thing,  upon  a  fuppolition  that  'tis  im- 
pofiible  for  him  to  do  it.  He  therefore  who  fays 
the  king  cannot  do  it,  fays  it  muft  be  done  by  others, 
or  not  at  alL     Eat  having  already  proved  that  the 

king, 


ScS:.  26.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      227 

king,  merely  as  king,  has  none  of  the  qualities  re- 
quired forjudging  all  or  any  cafes,  and  that  many 
kings  have  all  the  defects  of  age  and  pcrfon  that 
render  men  moft  unable  and  unfit  to  give  any  fen- 
tence,  we  may  conclude,  without  contradicting 
Braifton,  that  no  king  as  king,  has  a  power  of  judg- 
ing, becaufe  fome  of  them  are  utterly  unable  and 
unfit  to  do  it  'j  and  if  any  one  has  fuch  a  power,  it 
mufl  be  confcr'd  upon  him  by  thofe  who  think  hira 
able  and  fit  to  perform  that  work.  When  Filmer 
finds  fuch  a  man,  we  muft  inquire  into  the  extent  of 
that  power  which  is  given  to  him  3  but  this  would 
be  nothing  to  his  general  propofition,  for  he  himfelf 
would  hardly  have  inferred,  that  becaufe  a  power 
of  judging  in  fome  cafes  was  conferred  upon  one 
prince  on  account  of  his  fitnefs  and  ability,  there- 
fore all  of  them,  however  unfit  and  unable,  have  a 
power  of  deciding  all  cafes.  Bcfides,  if  he  believe 
Bradion,  this  power  of  judging  is  not  inherent  in  the 
king,  but  incumbent  upon  him  by  virtue  of  his  oath, 
which  our  author  endeavours  to  enervate  and  annul. 
But  as  that  oath  is  grounded  upon  the  law,  and  the 
law  cannot  prefume  impoflibilities  and  atfurdi- 
ties,  it  cannot  intend,  and  the  oath  cannot  require, 
that  a  man  fhould  do  that  which  he  is  unable  and 
unfit  to  do.  Many  kings  are  unfit  to  judge  caufes, 
the  law  cannot  therefore  intend  they  ihould  do  it. 
The  context  alfo  fhews,  that  this  imagination  of  the 
king's  judging  all  caufes,  if  he  could,  is  merely  chi- 
merical :  for  Braclon  fays  in  the  fame  chapter, 
that  "  the  pov/er  of  the  king  is  the  power  of 
*'  the  law;"  that  is,  that  he  has  no  power  but 
by  the  law.  And  the  law  that  aims  at  juftice,  can- 
not make  it  to  depend  upon  the  uncertain  humour 
of  a  child,  a  woman,    or  a  foolilh  man ;  for  by 

-      0^2  that 


22^  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

that  means  it  would  deftroy  it  felf.  The  law  cannot 
therefore  give  any  fuch  power,  and  the  king  cannot 
have  it. 

If  it  be  faid  that  all  kings  are  not  fo^  that  fome  are 
of  mature  age,  wife,  jufl:  and  good;  or  that  the  quefdon 
is  not  what  is  good  for  the  fubjeft,  but  what  is 
glorious  to  the  king,  and  that  he  muft  not  lofe  his 
right  tho'  the  people  perifli ;  I  anfwer,  firfl:,  that 
whatfoevcr  belongs  to  kings  as  kings,  belongs  to  all 
kings:  this  power  of  judging  cannot  belong  to  all 
for  the  reafons  above-mentioned  :  it  cannot  therefore 
belong  to  any  as  king,  nor  without  madnefs  be  granted 
to  any,  till  he  has  given  teftimony  of  fuch  wifdom, 
experience,  diligence  and  goodnefs,  as  is  required  for 
fo  great  a  work.  It  imports  not  what  his  anceftors 
were ;  virtues  are  not  entail'd;  and  it  were  lefs  impro- 
per for  the  heirs  of  Hales  and  Harvey,  to  pretend 
that  the  clients  and  patients  of  their  anceftors  fhould 
depend  upon  their  advice  in  matters  of  law  andphyfic, 
than  for  the  heirs  of  a  great  and  wife  prince  to  pre- 
tend to  powers  given  on  account  of  virtue,  if  they  have 
not  the  fame  talents  for  the  performance  of  the  works 
required. 

Common  fenfe  'declares,  that  o;overnments  are 
inftituted,  and  judicatures  eredled  for  the  obtaining 
of  juftice.  The  kings  bench  v/as  not  eftabliflied 
that  the  chief  juftice  ftiould  have  a  great  oflice,  but 
that  the  opDreffed  ftiould  be  relieved,  and  rio;ht  done. 
The  honour  and  profit  he  receives,  comes  in  as  it 
wxre  by  accident,  as  the  rewards  of  his  fervice,  if  he 
rightly  perform  his  duty :  but  he  may  as  well  pretend 
he  is  there  for  his  own  fake,  as  the  king.  God  did 
not  fet  up  Mofes  or  Joftiua,  that  they  might  glory  in 
havino;  ftx  hundred  thcufand  men  under  their  com- 
mand,  but  that  they  might  lead  the  people  into  the 
land  they  were  to  poftefs ;  that  is^  they  were  not  for 

them- 


Sea.  26.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      229 

themfelves  but  for  the  people  -,  and  the  gloiy  they 
acquired  was  by  rightly  performing  the  end  of  their 
inftitution.  Even  our  author  is  obliged  to  confefs 
this,  when  he  fays,  that  the  king's  prerogative  is  infti- 
tuted  for  the  good  of  thofe  that  are  under  it.  'Tis 
therefore  for  them  that  he  enjoys  it,  and  it  can  no 
otherwife  fubfift  than  in  concurrence  with  that  end. 
He  alfo  yields  that  "  the  fafety  of  the  people  is  the 
'"'  fupreme  law.'*  The  right  therefore  that  the  king 
has  mufl  be  conformable  and  fubordinate  to  it.  If 
any  one  therefore  fetup  an  intereftin  himfelf  that  is 
not  fo,  he  breaks  this  llipreme  law;  he  doth  not  live 
and  reign  for  his  people  but  for  himfelf,  and  by  de- 
parting from  the  end  of  his  inftitution  deftroys  it : 
and  if  '^  Ariflotle  (to  whom  our  author  fcems  to  have 
a  great  deference)  deferves  credit,  fuch  a  one  ceafes 
to  be  a  king,  and  becomes  a  tyrant ;  he  v/ho  ought  to 
have  been  the  befl  of  men  is  turned  into  the  worft ;' 
and  he  who  is  recommended  to  us  under  the  name 
of  a  father,  becomes  a  public  enemy  to  the  people. 
The  queflion  therefore  is  not,  v/hat  is  good  for  the 
king,  but  what  is  good  for  the  people,  and  he  can 
have  no  right  repugnant  to  them. 

Bradron  is  not  more  gentle.  '^'  The  king,"  fays 
he,  *'  is  obliged  by  his  oath,  to  the  utmoft  of  his 
*'  power,  to  preferve  the  church,  and  the  chrillian 
"  world  in  peace;  to  hinder  rapine,  and  all  manner 
"  of  iniquity;  to  caufe  juftice  and  mercy  to  be  ob- 
*'  ferved  :  he  has  no  power  but  from  the  law  :  that 
"  only  is  to  be  taken  for  law,  quod  recle  fuerit 
*^  definitum  :"  he  is  therefore  to  caufe  juftice  to  he 
done  according  to  that  rule,  and  not  to  pervert  it  for 
his  own  pleafure,  profit  or  glory.  He  may  choofe 
judges  alfo,  not  fjch  as  will  be  fubfervient  to  his 
will,  but  **  viros  fapientes,  timxntes-  Deum,  in 
*Polit.l.  I. 

0^3  ""'  qi-iibus 


cc 


cc 


cc 


ti 


cc 


cc 


230  DISCOURSES         Chap,  III, 

qulbus  eft  Veritas  eloqulorum,  &  qui  oderunt 
avaritiam  *."  V/hich  proves  that  kings  and  their 
officers  do  not  poffefs  their  places  for  themfelves,  but 
for  the  people,  and  muft:  be  fuch  as  are  fit  and  able 
to  perform  the  duties  they  undertake.  The  mifchie^ 
vous  fury  of  thofe  who  afTume  a  power  above  tlieir 
abilities  is  well  reprefented  by  the  known  fable  of 
Phaeton:  they  think  they  defire  line  things  for  them^ 
felves  when  they  feek  their  own  ruin.  In  con^ 
formity  to  this  the  fameBradon  fays,  that  ^'  If  any 
man  who  is  unfkilfal  ailume  the  feat  of  jaftice,  he 
falls  as  from  a  precipice,  &c.  and  'tis  the  fame 
thing  as  if  a  fword  be  put  into  the  hand  of  a  mad 
man  -f- ;"  which  cannot  but  affedl  the  king  as  well 
as  thofe  who  are  chofen  by  him.  If  he  negledt  the 
fundlions  of  his  office,  ''  he  does  unjuftly,  and  be- 
"  comes  the  vicegerent  of  the  devil ;  for  he  is  the 
**  minifter  of  him  whofe  works  he  does."  This  is 
Bradton's  opinion,  but  defiring  to  be  a  more  gentle 
interpreter  of  the  law,  I  only  wifli,  that  princes 
would  confider  the  end  of  their  inftitution;  endeavour 
to  perform  it ;  meaiure  their  own  abilities  -,  content 
themfelves  with  that  povvxr  which  the  laws  allow, 
and  abhor  thofe  wretches  who  by  flattery  and  lies  en- 
deavour to  work  upon  their  frailefl:  paffions,  by  which 
means  they  draw  upon  them  that  hatred  of  the 
people,  which  frequently  brings  them  to  deftrudion. 
Tho'  Ulpian's  uords,  *'  Princeps  legibus  non 
**  tenetur,"  be  granted  to  have  been  true  in  fad:, 
with  relation  to  the  Roman  empire,  in  the  tim.e 
when  he  lived  ;  yet  they  can  conclude  nothing 
asiainft  us.  The  libertv  of  Rome  had  been  over- 
thrown  long  before  by  the  power  of  the  fword,  and 
|:helaw  rcnderd  fubfervient  to  the  will  of  the  ufurpers. 

*  BraiFl.  I.  ^.  c.  10. 

-f  Si  qui' minus  fapiens  Si  indoflus  fedem  judicanli  S:  hore^'atem 
judicandi  fi'oi  pn^^UiiTifcrit,  exalto  corruit,  ^c,  Sc  pcriace  erit  ac  fi 
gladiuni  poneret  111  ir.r.na  furentis.     /^  ^y. 

They 


SecTt.  25.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     231 

They  were  not  Engliflimen,  but  Romans,  who 
loft  the  battles  of  Pharfalia  and  Philippi :  the  car- 
cafes  of  their  fenators,  not  ours,  were  expofed  i) 
the  wolves  and  vultures:  Pompeius,  Scipio,  Len-? 
tulus,  Afranius,  Petreius,  Cato,  Caffius  and  Brutus 
were  defenders  of  the  Roman,  nottheEnglifh  liberty  ^ 
and  that  of  their  country,  not  ours,  could  only  be 
loft  by  their  defeat  Thofe  who  were  deftroy'd 
by  the  profcriptions,  left  Rome,  not  England  to  be 
enilaved.  If  the  beft  had  gained  the  vidory,  it  could 
have  been  no  advantage  to  us,  and  their  overthrow- 
can  be  no  prejudice.  Every  nation  is  to  take  care  of 
their  own  laws ;  and  whether  any  one  has  had  the 
wifdom,  virtue,  fortune  and  power  to  defend  them 
or  not,  concerns  only  themfelves.  The  examples  of 
great  and  good  men  adling  freely  defer ve  confidera- 
tion,  but  they  only  perifh  by  the  ill  fuccefs  of  their 
deligns ;  and  whatfoever  is  afterwards  done  by  their 
fubdued  pofterity  ought  to  have  no  other  effed:  upon 
the  reft  of  the  world,  than  to  admoniih  them  fo  to 
join  in  the  defence  of  their  liberties,  as  never  to  be 
brought  under  thenecefiity  of  ading  by  the  command 
of  one,  to  ther  prejudice  of  themfelves  and  their 
country.  If  the  Roman  greatnefs  perfaade  us  to  put 
an  extraordinary  value  upon  what  paffed  among 
them,  we  ought  rather  to  examine  what  they  did, 
faid,  or  thouglit  when  they  enjoy'dthat  liberty  which 
was  the  mother  and  nurfe  of  their  virtue,  than  what 
they  fufFer'd,  or  were  forc'd  to  fay,  when  they  were 
fallen  under  that  ilavery  which  produced  all  manner 
of  corruption,  and  made  them  the  moft  bafe  and 
miferable  people  of  the  world. 

For  what  concerns  us,  the  adlons  of  our  anceftors 
refemble  thofe  of  the  antient  rather  than  the  later 
Romans :  tho'  our  2:overnment  be  not  the  fame  with 
theirs  in  form,  yet  it  is  in  prirxiple  ;  and  if  we  are 
not  degenerated,  we  ihall  rather  defire  to  imitate  tne 

0^4  Romans 


£32  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

Romans  In  the  time  of  their  virtue,  glory,  power 
and  felicity,  than  v/hat  they  v/ere,  in  that  of  their 
fiavery,  vice,  Ihame  and  mifery.  In  the  beft 
times,  when  '^  the  laws  were  more  powerful  than 
'*  the  commands  of  men,"  fraud  was  accounted  a 
crime  fo  deteftable  as  not  to  be  imputed  to  any  but 
Haves ;  and  he  who  had  fought  a  power  above  the 
law  under  colour  of  interpreting  it,  would  have 
been  expofed  to  fcorn,  or  greater  punifhm.ents,  if 
any  can  be  greater  than  the  juil:  fcorn  of  the  beft 
men.  And  as  neither  the  Romans,  nor  any  people 
of  the  world,  have  better  defended  their  liberties 
than  the  Englifh  nation  when  any  attempt  has  been 
made  to  opprefs  them  by  force,  they  ought  to  be  no 
lefs  careful  to  preferve  them  from  the  more  dangerous 
efforts  of  fraud  and  falfhood. 

Our  anceftors  were  certainly  in  a  low  condition  in 

the  time  of  Wiiliam  the  firfl :  many  of  their  beft 

men  had  periihed  in  the  civil  wars  or  v/ith  Harold : 

their  valour  was  great,  but  rough,  and  void  of  fl^ill : 

The  Normans  by  frequent  expeditions  into  France, 

Italy  and  Spain,  had  added  fubtilty  to  the  boifterous 

violence  of  their  native  climate:  William  had  engaged 

his  faith,  but  broke  it,  and  turned  the  powder  with 

which  he  was  entrufted  to  the  ruin  of  thofe  that  had 

trufted   him.      He  deftroy'd  many   worthy  men, 

carried  others  into  Normandy,  and  thought  himfelf 

mafter  of  all.     He  was  crafty,  bold,  and  elated  with 

viflory  ;  but  the  refolution  of  a  brave  people  was 

invincible.     When  their  laws  and  liberties  were  in 

danger,  they  refolved  to  die  or  to  defend  them,  and 

made  him  fee  he  could  no  otherwife  preferve  his 

crown  and  life  than  by  the  performance  of  his  oath, 

and  accomplifliing  the  ends  of  his  eledion.     They 

neither  took  him  to  be  the  giver  or  interpreter  of 

their  laws,  and  w^ould  notfufterhim  tojyiolate  thofe  ; 

of 


ScS:.  26.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    233 

of  their  anceftors.     In  this  way  they  always  conti- 
nued ;  and  tho'  perhaps  they  might  want  fkill  to 
fall  upon  the  fureft  and  eafieil  means  of  reftraining 
the  lufls  of  princes,  yet  they  maintained  their  rights 
fo  well,  that  the  wifeft  princes  feldom  invaded  them ; 
and  the  fuccefs  of  thofe  who  were  fo  foolifh  to  at- 
tempt it  was  fuch,  as  may  juftly  deter  others  from 
following  their  unprofperous  examples.     We  have 
had  no  king  fince  William  the  firft  more  hardy  than 
Henry  the  eighth,  and  yet  he  fo  intirely  acknow- 
ledged the  power  of  making,  changing  and  repeahng 
laws  to  be  in  parliament,  as  never  to  attempt  any 
extraordinary  thing  otherwife  than  by  their  authority. 
It  was  not  he,  but  the  parliament  that  diifolved 
the  abbies :  he  did  not  take  their  lands  to  himfelf, 
but  receiv'd  what  the  parliament  thought  fit  to  give 
him  :  he  did  not  rejecfl  the  fupremacy  of  the  Pope, 
nor  affume  any  other   power   in   fpiritual  matters, 
than  the  parliament  conferred  upon  him.     The  intri- 
cacies of  his  marriages,  and  the  legitimation  of  his 
children  was  fettled  by  the  fame  power:  at  leaft  one 
of  his  daughters  could  not  inherit  the  crown  upon 
any  other  title  ;  they  who  gave  him  a  power  to  dif- 
pofe  of  the  crown  by  will  might  have  given  it  to  his 
groom  ',  and  he  was  too  haughty  to  afk  it  from 
them,    if  he   had  it  in  himfelf,  which   he  muft 
have  had,  if  the  laws  and  judicatures  had  been  in 
his  hand. 

This  is  farther  evidenced  by  what  pafled  in  the 
Tower  between  Sir  Thomas  Moor  and  Rich  the 
king's  folicitor,  who  afking,  if  it  would  not  be 
treafon  to  oppofe  Richard  Rich,  if  the  parliament 
fliould  make  him  king.  Moor  faid  that  was  Cafus 
levis  *;  for  the  parliament  could  make  and  depofe 
kings  as  they  thought  fit ;  and  then  (as  more  con- 

*  Hedert^  Hen.  Mil. 

ducing 


134  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

ducing  to  his  own  cafe)  alked  Rich  if  the  parHa- 
ment  fliould  enadl  '*  that  God  fhould  not  be  God '* 

9 

whether  fuch  as  did  not  fubmit  fhould  be  elleemed 
traitors  ?  'Tis  evident  that  a  man  of  the  acutenefs 
and  learning  of  Sir  Tho.  Moor  would  not  have  made 
uk  of  fuch  an  argument  to  avoid  the  neceflity  of 
obeying  what  the  parliament  had  ordained,  by  fhew- 
ing  his  cafe  to  be  of  a  nature  far  above  the  power 
of  man,  unlefs  it  had  been  confefled  by  all  men 
that  the  parliament  could  do  whatfoever  lay  within 
the  reach  of  human  power.  This  may  be  enough 
to  prove  that  the  king  cannot  have  a  power  over  the 
law ;  and  if  he  has  it  not,  the  power  of  interpret- 
ing laws  is  abfurdly  attributed  to  him,  lince  it  is 
founded  upon  a  fuppofition  that  he  can  make  them, 
which  is  falfe. 

SECT.     XXVIL 

Magna  Charta  was  not  the  original^  but  a  declcra" 
tion  of  the  EngliJI:  liberties,  7be  kin^s  power  is 
not  reftrained^  but  created  by  that  and  other  lai 
and  the  nation  that  made  the?n  can  only  correct  the 
defcdls  of  them. 

Agree  with  our  author  that  "  Magna  Charta 
"  was  not  mnde  to  reflrain  the  abfolute  authori- 
ty ;"  for  no  fuch  thing  was  in  being  or  pretended 
(the  folly  of  fuch  vifions  feeming  to  have  been  re- 
ferved  to  compleat  the  misfortunes  and  ignominy  of 
our  age ;)  but  it  was  to  affert  the  native  and  original 
liberties  of  our  nation  by  the  confeflion  of  the  king 
then  being,  that  neither  he  nor  his  fucceffors  fliould 
any  way  incroach  upon  them :  and  it  cannot  be 
faid  the  power  of  kings  is  diminiflied  by  that  or  any 
other  law  •  for  as  they  are  kings  only  by  law,  the 
law  may  confer  power  upon  one  in  particular,  or 
A  upon 


uo  ; 


Sefl.  27.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     235 

upon  him  and  his  fucceffors,  but  can  take  nothing 
from  them,  becaufe  they  have  nothing  except  what 
is  given  to  them.  But  as  that  which  the  law  gives, 
is  given  by  thofe  who  make  the  law,  they  only  are 
capable  of  judging,  whether  he  to  whom  they  gave 
it,  do  well  or  ill  employ  that  power,  and  confequent- 
ly  are  only  fit  to  correct  the  defeats  that  may  be 
found  in  it.  Therefore  tho'  I  fhould  confefs  that 
faults  may  be  found  in  many  ftatutes,  and  that  the 
whole  body  of  them  is  greatly  defedive,  it  will  not 
follow  that  the  compendious  way  of  referring  all  to 
the  will  of  the  king  fliould  be  taken.  But  what  de- 
feds  foever  may  be  in  our  law,  the  difeafe  is  not  fo 
great  to  require  extreme  remedies,  and  we  may  hope 
for  a  cheaper  cure.  Our  law  may  poffibly  have 
given  away  too  much  from  the  people,  and  provid- 
ed only  infufficient  defences  of  our  liberties  againft 
the  incroachments  of  bad  princes ;  but  none  who 
are  not  in  judgment  and  honefty  like  to  our  author, 
can  propofe  for  a  remedy  to  the  evils  that  pro- 
ceed from  the  error  of  giving  too  much,  the  refig- 
nation  of  all  the  reft  to  them.  Whatever  he  fays, 
^tis  evident  that  he  knows  this  to  be  true,  when, 
tho'  he  denies  that  the  power  of  kings  can  be  re- 
ftrained  by  afts  of  parliament,  he  endeavours  to 
take  advantage  of  fuch  claufes  as  were  either  fraudu- 
lently inferred  by  the  king's  officers,  who  till  the 
days  of  Henry  the  fifth  for  the  moft  part  had  the 
penning  of  the  public  a6ls,  or  through  negligence 
did  not  fully  explain  the  intentions  of  the  legillators; 
v^hich  would  be  to  no  purpofe  if  all  were  put  into 
the  hands  of  the  king  by  a  general  law  from  God, 
that  no  human  power  could  diminifh  or  enlarge  j 
and  as  his  laft  iliift  would  obliquely  put  all  into  the 
power  of  the  king  by  giving  him  a  right  of  inter- 
preting the  lav/j  and  judging  fuch  cafes  as  are  not 

clearly 


236  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HI: 

clearly  decided  5  which  would  be  equally  imperti- 
nent, if  he  had  openly  and  plainly  a  right  of  de- 
termining in  all  things  according  to  his  will. 

But  what  defeds  foever  may  be  in  any  ftatutes 
no  great  inconveniencies  could  probably  enfue,  if 
that  for  annual  parliaments  was  obferved,  as  of  right 
it  ought  to  be.  Nothing  is  more  unlikely,  than  that 
a  great  aflembly  of  eminent  and  chofen  men  fliould 
make  a  law  evidently  deflrudive  to  their  own  de- 
ligns;  and  no  mifchief  that  might  emerge  upon  the 
difcovery  of  a  miftake,  could  be  fo  extreme  that 
the  cure  might  not  be  deferred  till  the  meeting  of 
the  parliament,  or  at  leaft  forty  days  (in  which  time 
the  king  may  call  one)  if  that  which  the  law  has 
fixed  feem  to  be  too  long.  If  he  fail  of  this,  he 
performs  not  his  truft ;  and  he  that  would  reward 
fuch  a  breach  of  it  with 'a  vaft  and  uncontrolable 
power,  may  be  juftly  thought  equal  in  madnefs  to 
our  author,  who  by  forbidding  us  to  examine  the 
titles  of  kings,  and  enjoining  an  intire  veneration  of 
the  power,  by  w^hat  means  foever  obtained,  encou- 
rages the  worft  of  men  to  murder  the  beft  of  princes, 
with  an  affurance  that  if  they  profper  they  Ihall  en- 
joy all  the  honours  and  advantages  that  this  world 
can  afford. 

Princes  are  not  m^uch  more  beholden  to  him  for 
the  haughty  language  he  puts  into  their  mouths,  it 
having  been  obferved  that  the  worft  are  always  moft 
ready  to  ufe  it ;  and  their  extravagances  having  been 
often  chaftifed  by  law,'  fufficiently  proves,  that 
their  power  is  not  derived  from  a  higher  original  than 
the  law  of  their  own  countries. 

If  it  were  true,  that  the  anfwer  fometimes  given 
by  kings  to  bills  prefented  for  their  aflent,  did,  as 
our  author  fays,  amount  to  a  denial,  it  could  only 
ihev/  that  they  have  a  negative  voice  upon  that  which 

is 


Sea.  27.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      237 

is  agreed  by  the  parilarnent,  and  is  far  from  a  power 
of  adting  by  themfelves,  being  only  a  check  upon 
the  other  parts  of  the  government.     But  indeed  it  is 
no  more  than  an  elufion ;  and  he  that  does  by  art 
obliquely  elude,  confeiTes  he  has  not  a  right  abfo- 
lutely  to  refufe.     'Tis  natural  to  kings,  efpecially  to 
the  worft,  to  fcrew  up  their  authority  to  the  height ; 
and  nothing  can  more  evidently  prove  the  defed;  of 
it,  than  the  neceflity  of  having  recourfe  to  fuch  pi- 
tiful evaiions,  when  they  are  unwilling  to   do  that 
which  is  required.     But  if  I  fhould  grant  that  the 
words  import  a  denial,    and  that  (notwithftanding 
thofe  of  the  coronation  oath,  "  Quas  vulgus  elege- 
rit")   they  might  deny;  no  more  could  be  inferred 
from  thence,  than  that  they  are  entrufled   with  a 
power  equal  in  that  point,  to  that  of  either  houfe, 
and  cannot  be  fupreme  in  our  author's  fenfe,  unlefs 
there  were  in  the  fam^e  ftate  at  the  fame  time  three 
diftinfl:  fupreme  and  abfolute  powers,    which   is 
abfurd. 

His  cafes  relating  to  the  proceedings  of  the  flar- 
chamber  and  council-table,  do  only  prove  that  fome 
kings  have  encroached  upon  the  rights  of  the  nation, 
and  been  fuffered  till  their  exceifes  growing  to  be 
extreme,  they  turned  to  the  ruin  of  the  minifters 
that  advifed  them,  and  fometimes  of  the  kings 
themfelves.  But  the  jurifdidion  of  the  council  hav- 
ing been  regulated  by  the  ftatute  of  the  17  Car.  I. 
and  the  ftar-chamber  more  lately  aboliilied,  they 
are  nothing  to  our  difpute. 

Such  as  our  author  ufually  impute  to  treafon  and 
rebellion  the  changes  that  upon  iuch  occafions  have 
enfued;  but  all  impartial  men  do  not  only  juftify  them, 
but  acknowledge  that  all  the  crovi^ns  of  Europe  are  at 
this  day  enjoyed  by  no  other  title  than  fuch  acfls  fo- 
temnly  performed  by  the  refpeftive  nations,  who 

4  either 


2^8  DISCOURSES        Chap.  In. 

either  difliking  the  perfon  that  pretended  to  the 
crown  (tho'  next  in  blood)  or  the  government  of 
the  prefent  poffeffor,  have  thought  fit  to  prefer  an- 
other perfon  or  family.  They  alfo  fay,  that  as  no 
government  can  be  fo  perfed:  but  fome  defeft  may 
be  originally  in  it,  or  afterwards  introduced,  none 
can  fubfift  unlefs  they  be  from  time  to  time  reduc'd 
to  their  firft  integrity,  by  fuch  an  exertion  of  the 
power  of  thofe  for  \^/hofe  fake  they  were  inftituted, 
as  may  plainly  ihew  them  to  be  fubjefl:  to  no  power 
under  heaven,  but  may  do  whatever  appears  to  be 
for  their  own  good.  And  as  the  fafety  of  all  na- 
tions confifts  in  rightly  placing  and  meafuring  this 
power,  fuch  have  been  found  always  to  profper  who 
have  given  it  to  thofe  from  whom  ufurpations  were 
leaft  to  be  feared,  who  have  been  leaft  fubjedt  to  be 
awed,  cheated  or  corrupted;  and  who  having  the 
greateft  intereft  in  the  nation,  were  moil  concerned 
to  preferve  its  power,  liberty  and  welfare.  This  is 
the  greateft  truft  that  can  be  repofed  in  men.  This 
power  was  by  the  Spartans  given  to  the  Ephori  and 
the  fenate  of  twenty  eight ;  in  Venice  to  that  which 
they  call  Concilio  de  Pregadi ;  in  Germany,  Spain, 
France,  Swedeland,  Denmark,  Poland,  Hungary, 
Bohemia,  Scotland,  England,  and  generally  all  the 
nations  that  live  under  the  Gothic  polity,  it  has 
been  in  their  general  affemblies,  under  the  name  of 
diets,  cortez,  parliaments,  fenates,  and  the  like. 
But  in  what  hands  foever  it  is,  the  power  of  mak- 
ing, abrogating,  changing,  correcting  and  interpret- 
ing laws,  has  been  in  the  fame ;  kings  have  been 
rejeded  or  depofed ;  the  fucceffion  of  the  crown 
fettled,  regulated,  or  changed  ;  and  I  defy  any  man 
to  fhew  me  one  king  amongft  all  the  nations  above- 
mentioned,  that  has  any  right  to  the  crown  he  wears, 

unlefs  fuch  aits  are  eood. 

If 


Se6l.  28.    CONCERNING  GOVEJ^NMENT.     239 

If  this  power  be  not  well  placed,  or  rightly  pro- 
portioned to  that  which  is  given  to  other  magiftrates, 
the  ftate  muft  neceflarily  fall  into  great  diforders,  or 
the  moft  violent  and  dangerous  means  muft  be  fre- 
quently ufed  to  preferve  their  liberty.  Sparta  and 
Venice  have  rarely  been  put  to  that  trouble,  becaufe 
the  fenates  were  fo  much  above  the  kings  and  dukes 
in  power,  that  they  could  without  difficulty  bring 
them  to  reafon.  The  Gothic  kings  in  Spain  never 
ventured  to  difpute  with  the  nobility ;  and  Witza  and 
Rodrigo  expofed  the  kingdom  as  a  prey  to  the  Moors, 
rather  by  v/eakning  it  through  the  negled:  of  military 
difcipline,  joined  to  their  own  ignorance  and  cow- 
ardice, and  by  evil  example  bringing  the  youth  to 
refemble  them  in  Icwdnefs  and  bafenefs,  than  by 
eftablilliing  in  tliemfelves  a  power  above  the  law. 
But  in  England  our  anceftors,  who  feem  to  have  had 
fome  fuch  thing  in  their  eye,  as  balancing  the  pow- 
ers, by  a  fatal  miftake  placed  ufually  fo  much  in 
the  hands  of  the  king,  that  whenfoever  he  happened 
to  be  bad,  his  extravagances  could  not  be  reprefs'd 
without  great  danger.  And  as  this  has  in  feveral 
ages  coft  the  nation  a  vaft  proportion  of  generous 
blood,  fo  'tis  the  caufe  of  our  prefent  difficulties, 
and  threatens  us  with  more,  but  can  never  de- 
prive us  of  the  rights  we  inherit  from  our  fathers, 

SECT.     XXVIII. 

7he  EngliJJ:)  7tation  has  airways  been  governed  hj  it  Jeff 

or  its  reprefentatives. 

HAVING  proved  that  the  people  of  England 
have  never  acknowledged  any  other  human 
law  than  their  own,  and  that  our  parliaments  having 
the  power  of  making  and  abrogating  laws,  they 
only   can  interpret  them  and  decide  hard  cafes,  it 

plainly 


240  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

plainly  appears  there  can  be  no  truth  in  our  author's 
aflertion,  that  "  the  king  is  the  author,  corredlor 
*'  and  moderator  of  both  ftatute  and  common  law:" 
and  nothing  can  be  more  frivolous  than  what  he  adds, 
that  *'  neither  of  them  can  be  a  diminution  of  that 
"  natural  power  which  kings  have  over  their  people 
"  as  fathers  j"  in  as  much  as  the  differences  between 
paternal  and  monarchical  power  (as  he  aiTerts  it)  are 
vaft  and  irreconcileable  in  principle  and  pradlice,  as 
I  have  proved  at  large  in  the  former  parts  of  this 

work.  ^ 

But  left  we  (hould  be  too  proud  of  the  honour  he-; 
is  pleafed  to  do  to  our  parliaments  by  making  ufe  of 
their  authority,  he  fays,  "  We  are  firft  to  remember 
*'  that  till  the  conqueft"   (which  name  for  the  glory 
of  our  nation  he  gives  to  the  coming  in  of  the  Nor-- 
mans)  "  there  could  be  no  parliament  affembled  of/ 
''  the  general  ftates,  becaufe  we  cannot  learn  that . 
"  until  thofe  days  it  was  intirely  united  in  one." 
Secondly  he  doubts,  "  Whether  the  parliament  in 
"  the  time  of  the  Saxons  were  compofed  of  the 
''  nobility  and  clergy,  or  whether  the  commons  - 
"  v/ere  alfo  called  3"   but  concludes,  "  there  could, 
^'  be  no  knights  of  any  iliires,  becaufe  there  were 
«  no   fliires."      Thirdly,    "    that  Henry  the  firft 
«'  caufed  the  commons  firft  to  affemble  knights  and  ' 
*'  burgeffes  of  their  own  choofing;'*  and  w^ould  make 
this  to  be  an  ad:  of  grace  and  favour  from  that  king  : 
but  adds,  that  "  it  had  been  more  for  the  honour 
"  of  parliaments,    if    a  king  whofe  title   to   the 
*'  crown  had  been  better,  had  been  the  author  of  the 
*'  form  of  it." 

In  anfwer  to  the  firft,  I  do  not  think  my  felf 
obliged  to  inlift  upon  the  nam.e  or  form  of  the  parlia- 
ment 5  for  the  authority   of  a  magiftracy  proceeds 

not 


Secfl.  2g.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     241 

not  from  the  number  of  years  that  it  has  continued 5 
but  the  rectitude  of  the  inftitution,  and  the  authority 
of  thofe  that  inftituted  it.  The  power  of  Saul, 
David  and  Jeroboam,  was  the  fame  with  that  which 
belonged  to  the  laft  kings  of  Ifrael  and  Judah. 
The  authority  of  the  Roman  confuls,  didlators,  pre- 
tors  and  tribunes,  was  the  fame  as  foon  as  it  was 
eftabliflied  ;  was  as  legal  and  juft  as  that  of  the  kino;s 
of  Denmark,  which  is  faid  to  have  continued  above 
three  thoufand  years.  For  as  time  can  make  nothing 
lawful  or  juft,  that  is  not  fo  of  it  felf  (tho'  men  are 
unwilling  to  change  that  which  has  pleafed  their 
anceftors,  unlefs  they  difcover  great  inconveniences 
in  it)  that  which  a  people  docs  rightly  eilablifh  for 
their  own  good,  is  of  as  much  force  the  firft:  day, 
as  continuance  can  ever  give  to  it :  and  therefore  in 
matters  of  the  greateft:  importance,  wife  and  good 
men  do  not  fo  much  inquire  what  has  been,  as  what 
is  good  and  ought  to  be^  for  that  which  of  it  felf  is 
evil,  by  continuance  is  made  worfe,  and  upon  the 
firft  opportunity  is  juftly  to  be  abolifhed.  But  if 
that  liberty  in  w^hich  God  created  man,  can  receive 
any  ftrength  from  continuance,  and  the  rights  of 
Engl  iih men  can  be  render'd  more  unqueilionable  by 
prefcription,  I  fay  that  the  nations  whofe  rights  we 
inherit,  have  ever  enjoy'd  the  liberties  we  c!aim>  and 
always  exercifed  them  in  governing  themfelves 
popularly,  or  by  fuch  reprefentatives  as  have  been 
inftituted  by  themfelves,  from  the  time  they  were  firft 
knov/n  in  the  world. 

The  Britons  and  Saxons  lay  fo  lone  hid  in  the 
obfcurity  that  accompanies  barbarifm,  that  'tis  in 
vain  to  leek  what  was  done  by  either  in  any  v/riters 
more  antient  than  Csfar  and  Tacitus.  The  firft 
dcfcril^es  the  Britons  to  have  been  a  fierce  people 
zealous  for  liberty,  and  fo  obftinately  valiant  in  the 

Vol.  IL  R  defence 


242  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

defence  of  it,  that  tho'  they  wanted  fklll,  and  were 
overpowered  by  the  Romans,  their  country  could  na 
otherwife  be  fubdued  than  by  the  flaughter  of  all  the 
inhabitants  that  were  able  to  bear  arms.  He  calls 
them  a  free  people,  in  as  much  as  they  were  not  like 
the  Gauls,  governed  by  laws  made  by  the  great 
men,  but  by  the  people.  In  his  time  they  chofe 
Caflivellaunus,  and  afterwards  Caradatus,  Arviragus, 
Galoacus,  and  others  to  command  them  in  their 
wars,  but  they  retain'd  the  government  in  them- 
felves.  That  no  force  might  be  put  upon  them, 
they  met  arm'd  in  their  general  alTemblies  5  and  the' 
the  fmaller  matters  were  left  to  the  determination  of 
the  chief  men  chofen  by  themfelves  for  that  purpofe, 
they  referved  the  moft  important  (amongft  which 
the  choofing  of  thofe  men  was  one)  to  themfelves^ 
When  the  Romans  had  brought  them  low^  ^  they 
fet  up  certain  kings  to  govern  fuch  as  were  within, 
their  territories :  but  thofe  who  defended  themfelves 
by  the  natural  ftrength  of  their  lituation,  or  retired 
into  the  north,  or  the  iilands,  were  ftill  governed 
by  their  own  cufton^s,  and  were  never  acquainted 
with  domeftlc  or  foreign  flavery.  The  Saxons, 
from  whom  we  chiefly  derive  our  original  and  man- 
ners^ were  no  lefs  lovers  of  liberty,,  and  better  undef- 
ftood  the  ways  of  defending  it.  They  were  certain- 
ly the  mofl  powerful  and  valiant  people  of  Germany  j '' 
and  what  the  Germans  performed  under  Arioviftus,  i[ 
Arminius  and  Maroboduus,  IheWs  both  their  force 
and  their  temper.  If  ever  fear  entered  into  the  heart '' 
of  C^fai*,  it  fcems  to  have  been  when  he  was  to  deal 
with.  Arioviftus.  The  advantages  that  the  brave 
Germanicus  obtained  againft  Arminius,  were  at 
leafl  thought  equal  to  the  greateft  viftories  that  had 
been  gain'd  by  any  Pvoman  captain  ;    becaufe  thefe 

*  Liter  inHrumentarerv-itutis  regeshabu ere,     CTasU.  I( 

nationf 


■f: 


sect.  28.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      243 

nations  fought  not  for  riches,  or  any  inftruments  of 
luxury  and  pleafure,  which  they  defpifed,  but  for 
liberty.  This  was  the  principle  in  which  they  hved, 
as  appears  by  their  words  and  adions  ;  fo  that  Ar- 
minius  when  his  brother  Flavius,  who  ferved  the 
Romans,  boafted  of  the  increafe  of  his  pay,  and 
the  marks  of  honour  he  had  received,  in  fcorn  call- 
ed them  *'  ^  rewards  of  the  vileft  fervitude  3"  but 
when  he  himfclf  endeavoured  to  ufurp  a  power  over 
the  liberty  of  his  country  which  he  had  fo  bravely 
defended,  he  was  killed  by  thofe  he  would  have  op- 
prefs'd.  Tacitus  farther  defcrlbing  the  nature  of  the 
Germans,  lliews  that  the  Romans  had  run  greater 
hazards  from  them  than  from  the  Samnites,  Car- 
thaginians and  Parthians,  and  attributes  their  brave- 
ry to  the  -f*  liberty  they  enjoyed  3  for  they  are,  fays 
he,  neither  t  exhaufled  by  tributes,  nor  vexed  by 
publicans:  and  left  this  liberty  ihould  be  violated, 
*'  II  the  chief  men  confult  about  things  of  leffer 
"  moment  -,  but  the  moft  important  matters  are  de- 
"  termined  by  all."  Whoever  w^ould  know  the 
opinion  of  that  wife  author  concerning  the  German 
liberty,  may  read  his  excellent  treatife  concerning 
their  manners  and  cuftoms ;  but  I  prefume  this  may 
be  enough  to  prove  that  they  lived  free  under  fuch 
magiftrates  as  they  chofe,  regulated  by  fuch  laws  as 
they  made,  and  retained  the  principal  powers  of  the 
government  in  their  general  or  particular  councils. 
Their  kings  and  princes  had  no  other  power  than 
was  conferred  upon  them  by  thefe  §  affemblics,  who 

R  2  havin 


*  Vilis  fervitii  przemia.     7^;r.'V. 

f  Quippe  gravior  eil  Arfacio  regna  Germanorum  libertas. 
X  Exempti  oneribus  Sc  collationibus,  &c  tantum  in  uium  prsellorum 
iepofiti,  vc-lut  tela  &  arma  bcllis  refcrvantur. 

II  De  minoribus  principes  confukanr,  de  majoribus  omnes. 

C.  Tacit,  de  mcr.  Germ. 
§  Ut  tuibs  placuit  coiifidunt  armati,  filentium  per  raceidoces,  qui- 

DUS 


244  DISCOURSES        Chap.  ill. 

having  all  in  themfelves,  could  receive  nothing  from 
them,  who  had  nothing  to  give. 

'Tis  as  eafily  proved  that  the  Saxons  or  Angli^ 
from  whom  we  defcend,  were  eminent  among  thofe, 
whofe  power,  virtue,  and  love  to  liberty  the  above- 
mentioned  hiftorian  fo  highly  extols,  in  as  much  as 
beiides  what  he  fays  in  general  of  the  Saxons,  he 
names  the  Angli;  defcribes  their  habitation  near  Elbe^ 
and  their  religious  worfhip  of  the  Goddefs  Erthum, 
or  the  earth,  celebrated  in  an  ifland  lying  in  the 
mouth  of  that  river,  thought  to  be  Heyligland  5  in 
refemblance  of  which  a  fmall  one  lying  over  againft 
Berwick,  is  called  Holy  Ifland.  If  they  were  free  in 
their  own  country,  they  muft  be  fo  when  they  came 
hither.  The  manner  of  their  coming  fhews  they 
were  more  likely  to  impofe,  than  fubmitto  flavery; 
and  if  they  had  not  the  name  of  Parliament,  it  was 
becaufe  they  did  not  fpeak  French ;  or,  not  being 
yet  joined  with  the  Normans,  they  had  not  thought 
fit  to  put  their  affairs  into  that  method ;  but  having 
the  root  of  power  and  liberty  in  themfelves,  they 
could  not  but  have  a  right  of  eflablifliing  the  one  in 
fuch  a  form  as  beft  pleafed  them,  for  the  preferva- 
tion  of  the  other. 

This  being,  as  I  fuppofe,  undeniable,  it  imports 
not  w^hether  the  affemblies  in  which  the  fupreme 
power  of  each  nation  did  refide,  were  frequent  or 
rare ;  compofed  of  many  or  few  perfons,  fitting 
altogether  in  one  place,  or  in  more;  what  name  they 
had  ;  or  whether  every  free  man  did  meet  and  vote 
in  his  own  perfon,  or  a  few  were  delegated  by  many. 
For  they  who  have  a  right  inherent  in  themfelves, 

bus  turn  coercendi  jus  eil,  imperatur.  Mox  rex  vel  piinceps  prout 
aetas  Cuique,  prout  nobilitas,  prout  decus  bellonim,  prout  facundia  eft, 
audiuntur,  auroriiate  fiiadendi,  ir.agis  quam  jubcndi  poteilate.  Si  dif- 
piicuit  fententia,  fremita  alpernantur ;  il  placuit,  framcas  concutiunt, 
^v:c.  Ibid. 

may 


Sea.  2S.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      245 

may  refign  it  to  others ;  and  they  who  can  give  ^ 
power  to  others,  may  exercife  it  themfelves,  unlefs 
they  recede  from  it  by  their  own  ad: ;  for  it  is  only 
matter  of  convenience,  of  which  they  alone  can  be 
the  judges,  becaufe  'tis  for  themfelves  only  that  they 
•  judge.  If  this  were  not  fo,  it  would  be  very  pre- 
judicial to  kings :  for  *tis  certain  that  Caffivellaunus, 
Caradlatus,  Arviragus,  Galgacus,  Hengift,  Horfa, 
and  others  amongft  the  Britons  and  Saxons,  what 
name  foever  may  be  abufively  given  to  them,  were 
only  temporary  magiftrates  chofen  upon  occafion  of 
prefent  wars  5  but  we  know  of  no  time  in  which 
the  Britons  had  not  their  great  council  to  determine 
their  moft  important  affairs  :  and  the  Saxons  in  their 
own  country  had  their  councils,  where  all  were  pre- 
fent, and  in  which  Tacitus  affures  us  they  difpatch- 
ed  their  o-reateft  buiinefs,  Thefe  were  the  fam.e  with 
the  Micklegemots  which  they  afterwards  held  here, 
and  might  have  been  called  by  the  fame  name,  if 
Tacitus  had  fpoken  Dutch. 

If  a  people  therefore  have  not  a  power  to  create 
at  any  time  a  magiilracy  which  they  had  not  before, 
none  could  be  created  at  all,  for  no  magiftracy  is 
eternal :  and  if  for  the  validity  of  the  conftitution 
it  be  neceffary,  that  the  beginning  muft  be  unknown, 
or  that  no  other  could  have  been  before  it,  the  mo- 
narchy amongft:  us  cannot  be  eilabliflied  upon  any 
right ;  for  tho'  our  ancefcors  had  their  councils  and 
magiftrates,  as  well  here  as  in  Germany,  they  h  d 
no  monarchs.  This  appears  plainly  by  the  teilimo- 
ny  of  C23far  and  Tacitus ;  and  our  later  hiftorits 
fhov/,  that  as  foon  as  the  Saxons  came  into  this  coun- 
try, they  had  their  iViicklegemots,  w^hicli  were  ge- 
neral affemblies  of  the  noble  and  freemen,  who  had 
in  themfelves  the  power  of  the  nation  :  and  tho' 
when  they  increafed  in  numbers,  they  eredred  (even. 

R  3  kingdom  Sj 


! 

240  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III.    1 

kingdoms,  vet  everv  one  retained  tlie  fame  ufao^e 
within  itfelf.     Theie  aiTemblies  were  evidently  the 
fame  in  power  with  our  parliaments  ^  and  tho'  they 
differed  in  name  or  form,  it  matters  not,  for  they 
who  could  ad:  in  the  one.  could  not  but  have  a  power  Jj 
of  inftituting  the  other;    that  is,    the  fame  people'" 
that  could  meet  together  in  their  own  perfons,  and 
according  to  their  own  pleaiure  order  all  m^atters  re-  I 
lating  to  themfelves,  whiUt  three  or  four  counties 
only  were  under  one  government,  and  their  num- 
bers were  not  fo  great,  or  their  habitation  fo  far  dif- 
tant,  that  they  might  not  meet  all  together  witJioiiti 
inconvenience,  with  the  fame  right  might  depute 
others  to  reprefent  them,  when  being  joined  in  one, 
no  place  was  capable  of  receiving  fo  great  a  multi- 
tude, and  that  the  frontiers  would  have  been  expof- 
ed  to  the  danger  of  foreign  invafions,  if  any  fuch 
thing  had  been  pracftifed. 

But  if  the  authority  of  parliaments,  for  miany 
ages  reprefenting  the  whole  nation,  were  lefs  to  be 
valued  (as  our  author  infinuates)  becaufe  they  could 
not  reprefent  the  whole,  when  it  v/as  not  joined  in 
one  body,  that  of  kings  muft  com.e  to  nothing; 
for  there  could  be  no  one  king  over  all,  when  the 
nation  was  divided  into  feven  diftind:  governments : 
and  'tis  moft  abfurd  to  think  that  the  nation,  which 
had  feven  great  councils,  or  Micklegemots,  at  the 
fame  time  they  had  feven  kingdoms,  could  not  as 
well  unite  the  feven  councils  as  the  feven  kingdoms 
into  one.  'Tis  to  as  little  purpofe  to  fay,  that  the 
nation  did  not  unite  itfelf,  but  the  feveral  parcels  came 
to  be  inherited  bv  one  ;  for  that  one  could  inherit  no 
iriorefromthcotherthan  v/hatthey  had;  and  the  feven 
being  only  magiftrates  ict  up  by  the  Micklegemots 
&c.  the  one  mud  be  io  alfo.  And  'tis  neither  rea- 
ionable  to  iiDa^iiic^    nor  pcilible  to  prove^  that  a 

fierce 


; 


Sea..  2B.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      24; 

fierce  nation,  jealous  of  liberty,  and  who  had  ob- 

ftinately  defended  it  in  Germany  againft  all  invaders, 

Ihoiild  conquer  this  country  to  enflave  themfelves, 

snd  purchafe  nothing  by  their  valour  but  that  fervi- 

tude  which  they  abhorred ;    or  be  lefs  free  when 

they  were  united  into  one  ftate,  than  they  had  been 

wlien  they  were  divided  into  feven  ;  and  leaft  of  all, 

that  one  man  could  firil  fubdue  his  own  people,  and 

then  all  the  reft,  when  by  endeavouring  to  fubdue 

his  own,    he  had  broken  the  truft  repofed  in  him, 

and  loft  the  right  conferred  upon  him,  and  without 

them  had  not  power  to  fubdue  any.     But  as  it  is 

my  fate  almoft  ever  to  dificnt  from  our  author,  I 

affirm,  that   the  variety  of  government,  which  is 

obferved  to  have  been  amongft  the  Saxons,  v/ho  in 

fome  ages  were  divided^  in  others  united  .;  fome- 

.times  under  captains,  in  other  times  under  kings ; 

fometimes  meeting  perfonally  in  the  Micklegemots, 

fometimes  by  their  delegates  in  the  Wittenagemots, 

•does  evidently  teftify,   that  they  ordered  all  things 

according  to  their  own  pleafure  ;  which  being  the 

utmoft  ad:  of  libertyj    it  remained  inviolable  under 

all  thofe  changes,  as  we  have  already  proved  by  the 

confeffion  of  OfFa,  Ina,  Alfred,  Canutus,  Edward^ 

and  other  particular,  as  v/ell  as  univerfal  kings :  and 

we  mav  be  fure  thofe  of  the  Norman  race  can  have 

no  more  power,  fince  they  came  in  by  the  fame 

way,  and  fwore  to  govern  by  the  fame  laws. 

2.  I  am  no  way  concerned  in  our  author's  doubt, 
*'  Whether  parliaments  did  in  thofe  days  confift  of 
*^  nobility  and  clergy ;  or  whether  the  commons 
*'  were  alfo  called."  For  if  it  v/ere  true,  as  he  af- 
ferts,  that  according  to  the  eternal  law  of  God  and 
nature,  there  can  be  no  government  in  the  world 
but  that  of  an  abfolute  monarch,  whofe  fovereign 
majefty  can  be  diminiftied  by  no  law  or  cuftom, 

R  4  .        tlierc 


24S  DISCOURSES       Chap.  III. 

there  could  be  no  parliaments,  or  other  magiftracies, 
that  did  not  derive  their  power  and  being  from  his,| 
will.     But  having  proved  that  the  Saxons  had  their^ 
general  councils  and  affemblies  when  they  had  no 
kings;  that    by    them   kings  were  made,    and  the 
greateil  affairs  determined,  whether  they  had  kings 
or  not  ;  it  can  be  of  no  importance,  whether  in  one 
cr  more  ages  the  commons  had  a  part  in  the  govern- 
ment, or  not.     For  the  fame  power  that  inftituted 
a   parliament   without    them,    might,    when   they 
thought  fit,    receive  them    into  it  :    or  rather,  if 
they  who  had  the  government  in  their  hands,  did, 
for   reafons    known    to   themfelves,    recede    from 
the  exercife  of  it^  they  might  refume  it  when  they 
pleafed. 

Neverthelefs  it  may  be  worth  our  pains  to  enquire, 
what  our  author  means  by  nobiHty.  If  fuch,  as  at 
this  day  by  means  of  patents  obtained  for  money,  or 
by  favour,  without  any  regard  to  merit  in  the  per- 
fons  or  their  anceftors,  are  called  dukes,  marquiffes, 
&c.  I  give  him  leave  to  impute  as  late  and  bafe  an 
original  to  them  as  he  pleafes,  without  fearing  that 
the  rights  of  our  nation  can  thereby  be  im^paired  ; 
and  am  content,  that  if  the  king  do  not  think  fit  to 
fupport  the  dignity  of  his  own  creatures,  they  may 
fail  to  the  ground.  But  if  by  noblemen  we  are  to 
underfland  fuch  as  have  been  ennobled  by  the  virtues 
of  their  anceftors,  manifefted  in  fervices  done  to 
their  country,  I  fay,  that  all  nations,  amongft 
whom  virtue  lias  been  efteemed,  have  had  a  great 
regard  to  them  and  their  pofterity  :  and  tho'  kings, 
when  they  were  made,  have  been  intrufted  by  the 
Saxons,  and  other  nations,  with  a  power  of  en- 
nobling thofe  who  by  fervices  rendered  to  their  coun- 
try might  deferve  that  honour  ^  yet  the  boay  of  the 

nobility 


Sea.  28.   CONCERNING  GOVE>RNMENT.     249 

nobility  was  more  antient  than  fuch ;    for  it  had 
been  equally  impoffible  to  take  *  kings  (according  to 
Tacitus)   out  of  the  nobility  if  there  had  been  no 
nobility,  as  to  take  captains  for  their  virtue  if  there 
had  been  no  virtue ;  and  princes  could  not,  v^ith- 
out  breach  of  that  truft,  confer  honours  upon  thofe 
that  did  not  deferve  them  ;  which  is  fo  true,  that 
this  pradice  was  objeded  as  the  greateft  crime  againft 
-f  Vortigern,  the  laft  and  the  worfl:  of  the  Britifli 
kings  :  and  tho'  he  might  pretend  (according  to  fuch 
cavils  as  are  ufual  in  our  time)  that  the  judgment  of 
-thofe  matters  was  referred  to  him  ;  yet  the  world 
judged  of  his  crimes,  and   vv^hen  he  had  rendered 
himfelf  odious  to  God  and  men  by  them,  he  perifli- 
ed  in  them,    and   brought   deilrudion    upon    his 
country  that  had  fuffer'd  them  too  long. 

As  among  the  Turks,  and  moft  of  the  eaflern 
tyrannies,  there  is  no  nobility,  and  no  man  has  any 
confiderable  advantage  above  the  common  people, 
unlefs  by  the  immediate  favour  of  the  prince  -,  fo  in 
all  the  legal  kingdoms  of  the  north,  the  flrength  of 
the  government  has  always  been  placed  in  the  nobi- 
lity; and  no  better  defence  has  been  found  againft  the 
scncroachments  of  ill  kings,  than  by  fetting  up  an 
order  of  men,  who  by  holding  large  territories,  and 
having  great  numbers  of  tenants  and  dependants, 
might  be  able  to  redrain  the  exorbitances,  that  either 
the  kings  or  the  commons  might  run  into.  For 
this  end  Spain,  Germany,  France,  Poland,  Denmark, 
Sweden,  Scotland  and  England,  were  almoft  wholly 
divided  into  lcrd(l:iips  under  feveral  names,  by  which 
every  particular  polTellor  owed  allegiance    that  is, 

*  KegC;  fx  nobilitste.  ciuccb  ex  virtute  fumere.  2/...  Mor  uV/w.  r  -, 
-j-  Subiiniaio  eo   ccspk   Jaes  orrnium    icclcrum  crefcrre :   (o^viebat 

fcurrllis  nequitia,  odium  veritatis,  ^cc.  ut  vas  omnium  fcclerum  iolas 
;-viderctur  Vcrtigernus;  &  quod  maxima  Regis  honelbd  contrarium  eft, 

re. biles  depjimens,  &  m.oribus  &  fanguine  ignobiles  extolk-iis,    Deo  cc 

htnii.iibiis  efiicitur  odiofus.     Mat.  I'l'efim.  Ax\-  446. 

fuch 


250  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

fuch  an  obedience  as  the  law  requires)  to  the  king, 
and  he  reciprocally  fwore  to  perform  that  which  the 
fame  law  exacted  from  him. 

When  thefe  nations  were  converted  to  the  chrifti- 
an  religion,  they  had  a  great  veneration  for  the 
clergy  ;  and  not  doubting  that  the  men  whom  they 
efteemed  holy,  w^ould  be  juft,  thought  their  liber- 
ties could  not  be  better  fecured,  than  by  joining  thofe 
who  had  the  diredion  of  their  confciences,  to  the 
noblemen  who  had  the  command  of  their  forces. 
This  fucceeded  fo  well  (in  relation  to  the  defence  of 
the  publick  rights)  that  in  all  the  foremen tioned 
ftates,  the  bilhops,  abbots,  &c.  were  no  lefs  zea- 
lous or  bold  in  defending  the  publick  liberty,  than 
the  bell  and  greateft  of  the  lords  :  and  if  it  were 
true,  that  things  being  thus  eftabiiflied,  tlie  com- 
mons did  neither  perfonally,  nor  by  their  reprefen- 
tativeSj  enter  into  the  general  alTemblies,  it  could  be 
of  no  advantage  to  kings  ;  for  fuch  a  power  as  is 
above-mentioned,  is  equally  inconfiftent  with  the 
abfolute  fovereignty  of  kings,  if  placed  in  the  nobi- 
lity and  clergy,  as  if  the  commons  had  a  part.  If 
the  king  has  all,  no  other  man,  nor  number  of  men 
can  have  any.  If  the  nobility  and  clergy  have  the 
power,  the  commons  may  have  their  fliare  alfo. 
But  I  affirm,  that  thofe  whom  we  now  call  com- 
mons, have  always  had  a  part  in  the  government, 
and  their  place  in  the  councils  that  managed  it ;  for 
if  there  was  a  diftinftion,  it  muft  have  been  by  pa- 
tent, birth,  or  tenure. 

As  for  patents,  we  know  they  began  long  after 
the  coming  of  the  Normans,  and  thofe  that  now 
have  them  cannot  pretend  to  any  advantage  on  ac- 
count of  birth  or  tenure,  beyond  many  of  thofe 
who  liave  them  not.  Nay,  befides  the  feveral  branch- 
es of  the  families  that  now  enjoy  the  moft  antient 

honours. 


Sea  28.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      251 

honours,  which  confequently  are  as  noble  as  they,, 
and  fome  of  them  of  the  elder  houfes,  we  know 
many  that  are  now  called  commoners,  who  in  anti- 
quity and  eminency  are  no  way  inferior  to  the  chief 
of  the  titular  nobility :  and  nothing  can  be  more  ab- 
furd,  than  to  give  a  prerogative  of  birth  to  Cr-v-n, 
T-ft-n,  H-de,  B-nn-t,  Ofb-rn,  and  others,  before 
the  Cliftons,  Hampdens,  Courtneys,  Pelhams,  St. 
Johns,    Baintons,    Wilbrahams,  Hungerfords,  and 
many  others.     And  if  the  tenures  of  their  eftates  be 
confider'd,   they  have  the  fame,  and  as  antient  as 
any  of  thofe  who  go  under  the  nam,es   of  duke,  or 
marquis.     I  forbear  to  mention  the  fordid  ways  of 
attaining  to  titles  in  our  days ;  but  whoever  will 
take  the  pains  to  examine  them,  fliall  find  that  thev 
rather   defile   than   ennoble   the   poflTeflbrs.     And 
whereas  men  are  truly  ennobled  only  by  virtue,  and 
refpedt  is  due  to  fuch  as  are  defcended  from   thofe 
who  have  bravely  ferv'd  their  country,  becaufe  it  is 
prefumed  (till  they  fliew  the  contrary)  that  they 
will  refemble  their  anceflors,  thefe  modern  courti- 
ers, by  their  names  and  titles,  frequently  oblige  us 
to  call  to  mind  fuch  things  as  are  not  to  be  mentioned 
without  bluihing.     Whatever  the  antient  noblem^en 
of  England  were,  v/e  are  fure  they  were  not  fuch  as 
thefe.     And  tho'  it  (hould  be  confefs'd  that  no  others 
than  dukes,  marquiffes,  earls,  vifcounts,  and  barons, 
had  their  places  in  the  councils  mentioned  by  Caefar 
and  Tacitus,  or  in  the  great  alTemblies  of  the  Saxons, 
it  could  be  of  no  advantage  to  fuch  as  now  are  call- 
ed by  thofe  names.     They  were  the  titles  of  offices 
conferred  upon  thofe,  who  did  and  could  beft  con- 
duct the  people  in  time  of  war,  'give  counfel  to  the 
king,  adminifler  juftice,  and  perform  other  pubiick 
duties ;  but  were  never  made  hereditary  except  by 
abufe  3  much  lefs  were  they  fold  for  money,  or 

given 


252  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

given  as  recompences  of  the  vileft  ferviccs.  If  the 
antient  order  be  totally  inverted,  and  the  ends  of  its 
inftitution  perverted,  they  who  from  thence  pretend 
to  be  diftinguifhed  from  other  men,  muft  build 
their  claim  upon  fomething  very  different  from  an- 
tiquity. 

This  being  fufficient  (if  I  miftake  not)  to  make 
it  appear,  that  the  antient  councils  of  our  nation  did 
not  confift  of  fuch  as  v^e  now  call  noblemen,  it 
may  be  worth  our  pains  to  examine,  of  what  fort  of 
mQn  they  did  confift  :  and  tho'  I  cannot  much  rely 
upon  the  credit  of  Camden,  which  he  has  forfeited 
by  a  great  number  of  untruths,  I  will  begin  with 
him,  becaufe  he  is  cited  by  our  author.  If  we  be- 
lieve him,  *  "  That  which  the  Saxons  called  Witten- 
''-agemot,  we  may  juftly  name  parliament,  which 
*'  has  the  fupreme  and  moft  facred  authority  of  ma- 
"  king,  abrogating  and  interpreting  laws,  and  gene- 
"  rally  of  all  things  relating  to  thefafety  of  the  com- 
"  monwealth."  This  Wittenagemot  was,  according 
to  William  of  Malmfbury,  -f  ''The  general  meeting 
"  of  thefenate  and  people  ;"  and  Sir  Harry  Spelman 
calls  it,  j  "  The  general  council  of  the  clergy  and 
*'  people."  In  the  affem.bly  at  Calcuth  it  was  decreed 
by  the  archbiihops,  bifliops,  abbots,  dukes,  fena- 
tors,  and  the  people  of  the  land  (populo  tcnx)  that 
the  §  kings  fliould  be  elected  by  the  priefts  and  el- 
ders of  the  people."  By  thefe  Olfa,  Ina,  and  others, 
wti'Q  made  kings  ;  and  Alfred  in  his  w^ill  acknow- 

*  Quod  Saxones  olim  V/ittenagemot,  parllamcntum  Sc  panangli- 
cum  redte  dici  poHit,  fuiTiiTiamque  &  facrofan^am  habet  autoritatem 
in  legibus  fcrendis,  antiqcandis,  confcrmandis,  irterpretandis,  Sc  in 
omnibus  quai  ad  reipublic^e  falutem  rpedlant.     Brif.  fol.  63. 

-|-  Generalisfenatus  &  populi  conventus.      McJrjif. 

\  Commune  concilium  tarn  cleri  quam  populi.     Spehn. 

§  Ut  reges  a  facerdotibus  ^:  fenioiibus  populi  eligantur. 

ledgcd 


(C 


Std:.  28.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      253 

ledged  his  ||  crown  from  them.  Edgar  was  eledled 
by  all  the  people,  and  not  long  after  depofed  by  them, 
and  again  reflored  in  a  4-  Rcneral  affembly.  Thefe 
things  being  fometimes  faill  to  be  done  by  the  affent 
of  the  barons  of  the  kingHom,  Camden  fays,  that 
under  the  name  of  the  "*  Baronage,  all  the  orders 
of  the  kingdom  are  in  a  manner  comprehended  ;*' 
and  it  cannot  be  otherwife  under! iood,  if  we  con- 
fider  that  thofe  called  noblemen,  or  the  nobihty  of 
England,  are  often  by  the  hiftorians  faid  to  be  (in- 
finita  multitudo)  an  infinite  multitude. 

If  any  man  afk  hov/  the  nobility  came  to  be  fo 
numerous  ^  I  anfwer,  that  the  northern  nations, 
who  were  perpetually  in  arms,  put  a  high  efteem 
upon  military  valour  ;  fought  by  conqueft  to  ac- 
quire better  countries  than  their  own ;  valu'd  them- 
felves  according  to  the  numbers  of  men  they  could 
bring  into  the  field ;  and  to  difiinguifh  them  from 
villains,  called  thofe  noblemen,  who  nobly  defended 
and  enlarged  their  dominions  by  war ;  and  for  a 
reward  of  their  fervices,  in  tiie  divifion  of  lands  gained 
by  conqueft,  they  di'tributed  to  them  freeholds, 
under  the  oblieation  of  continuino;  the  fame  fervice 
to  their  country.  This  appears  by  the  name  of  knights 
fervice,  a  knight  being  no  more  than  a  foldier,  and 
a  knight's  fee  no  more  than  v/as  fufficient  to  main- 
tain one.  'Tis  plain,  that  knighthood  was  always 
efleemed  nobility  ;  fo  that  no  man,  of  what  quality 
foever,  thoup-ht  a  knieht  inferior  to  him,  cind  thofe 
of  the  higheil  birth  could  not  adt  as  noblemen  till 
they  were  knighted.  Among  the  Goths  in  Spain, 
the  cutting  oft  the  hair  (which  being  long  was  the 

|]  C^iam  Deus  &  principes  cum  fenioribus  populi  luilericojditcr  Si 
benigne  dtderunt. 

4-  Coram  omni  muldtudine  populi  Anglorum. 

*  Nomine  Baronagii  omnes  quodarn  inodo  re^ni  ordin:s  conti- 
nciUur.         Ccif/J. 

2  mark 


254  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

mark  of  knighthood)  was  accounted  a  degrading, 
and  looked  upon  to  be  fo  great  a  mark  of  infamy, 
that  he  who  had  fuffer'd  it,  could  never  bear  any 
honour  or  office  in  the  commonwealth  ^  and  there 
was  no  dignity  fo  high,  but  every  knight  was  capable 
of  it.  There  was  no  diftindlion  of  men  above  it, 
and  even  to  this  day  Baron,  or  Varon,  in  their  lan- 
guage, fignifies  no  more  than  Vir  in  latin,  which  is 
not  properly  given  to  any  man  unlefs  he  be  free. 
The  like  was  in  France,  till  the  coming  in  of  the 
third  race  of  kings,  in  w^hich  time  thetwelve  peers 
(of  whom  fix  only  were  laymen)  were  raifed  to  a 
higher  dignity,  and  the  commands  annexed  made 
hereditary ;  but  the  honour  of  knighthood  was  there- 
by no  way  diminifhed.  Tho'  there  were  dukes,  I 
earls,  marquiifes  and  barons  in  the  time  of  FroifTart, 
yet  he  ufually  calls  them  knights  :  and  Philip  de 
Commines,  fpeaking  of  the  moft  eminent  men  of 
his  time,  calls  them  good,  wife  or  valiant  knights. 
Even  to  this  day  the  name  of  gentlemen  compre- 
hends all  that  is  raifed  above  the  common  people  ; 
Henry  the  fourth  ufually  called  himfelf  the  firft  gen- 
tleman in  France  ^  and  'tis  an  ordinary  phrafe  among 
them,  when  they  fpeak  of  a  gentleman  of  good  birth, 
to  fay,  //  ejl  72oble  comme  le  roy  ;  he  is  as  noble  as 
the  king.  In  their  general  allembly  of  ellates,  the 
chamber  of  the  nobleffe,  which  is  one -of  three,  is 
compofed  of  the  deputies  fentby  the  gentry  of  every 
province  ;  and  in  the  inquiry  made  about  tlie  year 
1668  concerning  nobility,  no  notice  was  taken  of 
fuch  as  had  affumed  the  titles  of  earl,  marquis, 
vifcount,  or  baron,  but  only  of  thofe  who  called 
themfelves  gentlemen  -,  and  if  they  could  prove  that 
name  to  belong  to  them,  they  were  left  to  ufe  the 
other  titles  as  they  pleafed.  When  duels  were  in 
fafhion  (as  all  know  they  v/ere  lately)  no  man,  ex- 
4  cept 


StSz.  28.    CONCERNING  GOVERNiMENT.    255 

cept  the  princes  of  the  blood,   and  marechals  of 
France,  could  with  honour  refufe  a  challenge  from 
any  gentleman :  The  firft,  becaufe  it  was  thought 
unfit,  that  he  who  might  be  king,  iliould  fight  with 
a  fubjedl  to  the  danger  of  the  commonwealth,  which 
might  by  that  means  be  deprived  of  its  head  :  the 
others  being  by  their  ofHce  commanders  of  the  no- 
bilitv,  and  judges  of  all  the  controverfies  relating  to 
honour  that  happen  amongft  them,  cannot  reafon- 
ably  be  brought  into  private  contefts  with  any.     In 
Denmark,  Jtobleman   and  gentkfnan    is    the  fame 
thing;  and  till  the  year  1660,  they  had  the  princi* 
pal  part  of  the  government  in  their  hands.     When 
Charles  Guftavus,  king  of  Sweden,  invaded  Poland 
in  the  year  1655,  'tis  faid,  that  there  were  above 
three  hundredthoufand  gentlemen  in  arms  to  refill: 
him.     This  is  the  nobility  of  that  country ,  kings 
are  chofen  by  them  :  every  one  of  them  will  fay,  as 
in  France,  "  He  is  noble  as  the  king."  The  laft  king 
was  a  private  man  among  them,  not  thought  to  have 
had  more  than  four  hundred  pounds  a  year.     He 
who  now  reigns  was  not  at  all  above   him  in  birth 
or  eftate,  till  he  had  raifed  himfelf  by  great  fervices 
done  for  his  country  in  many  wars  ;  and  there  was 
not  one  2:entleman  in  the  nation    who  mi2:ht  not 
have  been  chofen  as  well  as  he,  if  it  had  pleafed 
the  affembly  that  did  it. 

This  being  the  nobility  of  the  northern  nations, 
and  the  true  baronage  of  England,  'tis  no  wonder 
that  they  were  called  Nobiles ;  the  moli  eminent 
among  them  Magnates,  Principes,  Proceres  3  and 
fo  numerous  that  they  were  efteemed  to  be  multi- 
tudo  infinita.  One  place  was  hardly  able  to  contain 
them  ;  and  the  inconveniences  of  calling  them  all 
together  appeared  to  be  fo  great,  that  they  in  time 
chofe  rather  to  meet  by  reprefentatlvcs,  than  every 

one 


2^6  DISCOURSES     '    Chap.  Ill, 

one  in  his  own  perfon.  The  power  therefore  re- 
maining in  them,  it  matters  not  what  method  they 
obferved  in  the  execution.  They  who  had  the  fub- 
ftance  in  their  hands,  might  give  it  what  form  they 
pleafed.  Our  author  fufficiently  manifefis  his  igno- 
rance, in  faying  there  could  be  no  knights  of  the 
fliires  in  the  time  of  the  Saxons,  becaufe  there 
were  no  fhires ;  for  the  very  word  is  Saxon,  and  we 
find  the  names  of  Barkfl:iire,  Wiltiliire,  Devonihire, 
Dorfetfliire,  and  others  moft  frequently  in  the  wri- 
tings of  thofe  times  ;  and  dukes,  earls,  thanes  or 
aldermen,  appointed  to  command  the  forces,  and 
look  to  the  diftribution  of  juftice  in  them.  Selden  * 
cites  Ingulphus  for  faying,  that  ''  Alfred  was  the  firft 
*'  that  changed  the  provinces,  &c.into  counties  :"  but 
refutes  him,  and  proves  that  the  diftindtion  of  the 
land  into  iliires  or  counties  (for  fliire  fignified  no 
more  than  the  fliare  or  part  committed  to  the  care 
of  the  earl  or  comes)  was  far  more  antient.  Whe- 
ther the  firft  divifions  by  the  Saxons  were  greater  or 
lefier  than  the  (hires  or  counties  now  are,  is  nothing 
to  the  queftion :  they  vv'ho  made  them  to  be  as  they 
were,  could  have  made  them  greater  or  leffer  as 
they  pleafed.  And  w^hether  they  did  immediately, 
or  fome  ages  after  that  diftindion,  ceafe  to  come  to 
their  great  aflemblies,  and  rather  choofe  to  fend  their 
deputies  ;  or,  whether  fuch  deputies  were  chofen 
by  counties,  cities  and  boroughs,  as  in  our  days,  or 
in  any  other  manner,  can  be  of  no  advantage  or  pre- 
judice to  the  caufe  that  I  maintain.  If  the  power 
of  the  nation,  when  it  was  divided  into  feveri  king- 
doms, or  united  under  one,  did  refide  in  the  Mickle- 
gemots  or  Wittenagemots  5  if  thefe  coi.filled  of  the 
nobihty  and  people,  who  were  fometimes  fo  nume- 
rous that  no  one  place  could  well  contain  them  5  and 

*  Seidell's  Tit.  of  hon.     p.  2.  c.  c. 


Sed.  28.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      257 

if  the  preference  given  to  the  chief  among  them, 
was  on  account  of  the  offices  they  executed,  either 
in  relation  to  war  or  juftice,  which  no  man  can  deny, 
I  I  have  as  much  as  ferves  for  my  purpofe.     'Tis  in- 
different to   me,  whether  they  were   called  earls, 
I   dukes,  aldermen,  hcrotoghs  or  thanes :  for  'tis  cer- 
i  tain  that  the  titular  nobility  now  in  mode  amongd 
;  us  has  no  refemblance  to  this  antient  nobility  of  Eng- 
land.    The  noveltv   therefore  is  on  the  other  fide, 
and  that  of  the  worft  fort  ^  becaufe   by   giving  the 
name  of  noblemen  (v/hich  antiently    belonged   lo 
fuch  as  had   the   greateft  interefts   in  nations,  and 
were  the  fupporters  of  their  liberty)  to  court- crea- 
tures, who  often  have  none,  and  either  acquire  their 
honours  by  money,  or  are  preferred  for  fervile  and 
fometimes  impure  fervices  rendered  to  the  perfon  that 
reigns,  or  elfe  for  mifchiefs  done  to  their  country, 
the  conftitution  has  been  wholly  inverted,  and  the 
truft   repofed  in  the  kings  (who  in  fome  mcafure 
had  the  diipofal  of  offices  and  honours)  mifemploy*d. 
This  is  farther  aggravated  by  apprppriating  the  name 
of  noblemen  foiely  to  them  ^   whereas   the    nation 
having  been  antiently  divided  only  into  freemen  or 
noblemen  (who  were  the  fame/  and  villains ;  the 
firlt  were,  as  Tacitus  fays   of  their  anceflors   the 
Germans,  *  "  exempted  from  burdens  and  contri- 
butions, and  referved  like  arms  for  the  ufes  of  war," 
whiift  the  others  were  little  better  than  flaves,  an- 
pointed  to  cultivate  the  lands,  or  lo   other   fervile 
offices.     And  I  leave  any  reafonable  man  to  judo-e, 
whether  the  latter  condition  be  that  of  thofe  wc  now 
call  commoners.     Neverthelefs,  he  that  will  believe 
the  title  of  noblemen  flill  to   belong  to  thofe  only 
who  are  fo  by  patent,  may  guefs  how  well  our  wars 

•  *  Exempt!  oneribiis  &  coUationibus,  S<  tantum  in  ufum  prali  >ruin 
reponti,  velutitelaSiarma  beiiiirelbrvantur.  Corn.  ^i.t;V.deiiiorib.  Germ.  - 

^  Vol.  II.  S  would 


258  D  I  S  C  O  U  .R'S  E  S        Chap.  Hi. 

would  be  managed  if  they  were  left  folely  to  fuch  as 
are  fo  by  that  title.     If  this  be  approved,  his  majefly 
may  do  well  with  his  hundred  and  fifty  noblemen, 
eminent  in  valour  and  military  experience  as  they 
are  known  to  be,  to  make  fuch  wars  as  may  fall  up- 
on him,  and  leave  the  defpifed  commons  under  the 
name  of  villains,  to  provide  for  themfelves  if  the  fuc- 
cefs  do  not  anfwer  his  expedations.     But  if  the  com- 
mons are  as  free  as  the  nobles,  many  of  them   in 
birth  equal  to  the  patentees,  in  eftate  fuperior  to 
moft  of  them  ;  and  that  it  is  not  only  expedled  they 
(liould  affiit  him  in  wars  with  their  perfons  and  pur- 
fes,  but  acknowledged  by  all,  that  the  fhrength  and 
virtue  of  the  nation  is  in  them,  it  muft  be  confefs'd, 
that  they  are  true  noblemen  of  England,  and  that 
all  the  privileges  antiently  enjoy 'd  by  fuch,  muft  ne- 
ceffarily  belong  to    them,    fmce  they  perform  the 
ofiices  to  which  they  were  annexed.  This  fliews  how 
the  nobility  were  juftly  faid  to  be  almoft  infinite  in 
number,  fo  that  no  one    place  was  able  to  contain 
them.     The  Saxon  armies  that  came  over  into  this 
country  to  a  wholefom  and  generative  climate,  might 
well  increafe  in  four  or  five  ages  to  thofe  vaft  num- 
bers, as  the  Franks,  Goths  and  others  had  done  in 
Spain,  France,  Italy,  and  other  parts  :  and  when 
they  were  grown  fo  numerous,    they  found  them- 
felves neceflarily  obliged  to  put  the  power  into  the 
hands  of  reprefentatives  chofen  by  themfelves,  which 
they  had  before  exercifed  in  their  own  perfons.    But 
thefe  two  Vv^ays  differing  rather  in  form  than  eflTen- 
tially,  the  one  tending  to  Democracy,  the  other  tp 
Ariftocracy,  they  are  equally  oppofite  to  the  abfo- 
hite  dominion  of  one  man  reigning  for  himfelf,  and 
governing  the  nation  as  his  patrimony  5  and  equally 
alTert  the  rights  of  the  people  to  put  the  government 
into  fuch  a  form  as  beft  pleafes  themfelves.     This 

was 


Sea.  28.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     259 

was  fuitable  to  what  they  had  pradlifed  in  their  own 
country  ;  "  de  minoribus  confultant  Principes,  de 
*'  majoribus  omnes/'  *  Nay,  even  theie,  IhialU 
*'  er  matters"  cannot  be  faid  properly  to  relate  to 
the  king  ;  for  he  is  but  one,  and  the  word  ''  Prin- 
"  cipes"  is  in  the  plural  number,  and  can  only  f^g- 
nify  iuch  principal  men,  as  the  fam.e  autlior  fays 
were  chofen  by  the  general  aflcmblies  to  dojuftice, 
&c.  and  to  each  of  them  one  hundred  comites  join- 
ed, not  only  to  give  advice,  but  authority  to  their 
aftions. 

The  word  omnes  fpoken  by  a  Roman,  mufl  like- 
wife  be  underftood  as  it  was  ufed  by  them,  and  im- 
ports all  the  citizens,  or  fuch  as  m.ade  up  the  body 
of  the  commonwealth.  If  he  had  fpoken  of  Rome 
or  Athens  whilft  thev  remained  free,  he  muft  hav^e 
ufed  the  fame  word  (becaufe  all  thofe  of  whom  the 
city  confifted  had  votes  how  great  foever  the  num- 
ber of  flaves  or  ftrangers  might  have  been.  The 
Spartans  are  rightly  faid  to  have  gained,  loft  and 
recovered  the  lordfhip  or  principality  of  Greece, 
They  were  all  lords  in  relation  to  their  Helotes,  and 
fo  were  the  Dorians  in  relation  to  that  fort  of  men, 
which  under  feveral  names  they  kept,  as  the  Saxons 
did  their  villains,  for  the  perform.ance  of  the  cfnces 
which  they  thought  too  m_ean  for  thofe  w^ho  v/ere 
ennobled  by  liberty,  and  the  ufe  of  arms,  by  which 
the  commonwealth  was  defended  and  enlarged. 
Tho*  the  Romans  fcorned  to  give  the  title  of  Lord  to 
thofe  who  had  ufurped  a  power  over  their  lives  and 
fortunes  j  yet  every  onQ  of  them  was  a  lord  in  rela- 
tion to  his  own  fervants,  and  altogether  are  often 
called  t  Lords  of  the  world  :  the  like  is  ictn  almoft 
every  where.     The  government  gf  Venice  having 

*  Tacit,  de  mor.  Germ. 

S  z  continued 


260  D  I  S  C  O  U  R  S  E  a        Chap,  lit 

continued  for  many  ages  in  the  fame  families,  has 
ennobled  them  all.     No  phrafe  is  more  common  in 
Switzerland,  than  the  lords  of  Bern,  or  the  lords  of 
Zurich  and  other  places,  tho'  perhaps  there  is  not 
a  man  amongil  them,  who  pretends  to  be^  a  gentle- 
man, according  to  the   modern  fenfe  put  upon  that 
word.    The  ftates  of  the  United  Provinces  are  called 
high  and  mighty  lords,  and  the  fame  title  is  given 
to  each  of  them  in  particular.     Nay,  the  word  Heer 
which  fignifies  Lord  both  in  high  and  low^  Dutch, 
is  as  common  as  Monfieur  in  France,  Signer  in  Italy, 
or  Sennor  in  Spain  -,  and  is  given  to  every  one  who 
is  not  of  a  fordid  condition,  but  efpecially  to  foldiers: 
and  tho'  a  common  foldier  be  now  a  much  meaner 
thing  than  it  was  antiently,  no  man  fpeaking  to  a 
company  of  foldiers  in  Italian,  ufes  any  other  ftile , 
than    Signori  Soldati  ;  and  the  like  is  done  in  other 
languages.     'Tis  not  therefore  to  be  thought  ftrange, 
if  the  Saxons,  who  in  their  own  country  had  fcorn- 
ed  any  other  employment  than  that  of  the  fword, 
ihould  think  themfelves  farther  ennobled,  when  by 
their  arms  they  had  acquired  a  great  and  rich  coun- 
try, and  driven  out  or  fubdued  the  former  inhabi- 
tants.     They  might  well    diftinguiili    themfelves 
from  the  villains  they  brought  with  them,  or  the 
Britons  they   had  enfxaved.     They  might  well  be 
called  '^  Magnates,  Proceres regni,  Nobiies,  Angliae 
"   Nobilitas,  Barones /'  and  the  aflemblies  of  them 
juftly  called  ''  Concilium  regni  generale,  Univerfi- 
*'  tas  totlus  Anglis  Nobilium,  Univerfitas  Barona- 
*'  gii,"  according  to  the  variety  of  times  and  other 
occurrences.     We   have  fuch    footfteps  remaining 
of  the  name  of  Baron,  as  plainly  fliew  the  iignifica- 
tion  of.it.   The  barons  of  London  and  the  Cinq  ports 
are  known  to  be  only  the  freemen  of  thofe  places. 
In  the  petty  court-barons,  every  man  who  may  be 
■  •  of 


Sea.  28.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      261 

of  a  jury  is  a  baron.  Tlicle  are  noblemen  ;  for 
there  are  noble  nations  as  well  as  noble  men  in  nati- 
ons. The  Mammalukes  accounted  thenifelves  to 
be  all  noble,  tho'  born  flaves ;  and  when  they  had 
ennobled  themfelves  by  the  ufe  of  arms,  they  iook'd 
upon  the  nobleft  of  the  Egyptians  as  their  flaves. 
Tertulliaa  v/riting,  not  to  fome  eminent  men,  but 
to  the  whole  people  of  Carthage,  calls  them  Anti- 
quitate  nobiles,  nobilitate  felices.  Such  were  the 
Saxons,  ennobled  by  a  perpetual  application  to  thofe 
exercifcs  that  belong  to  noblemen,  and  au  abhor- 
rence to  any  thing  that  is  vile  and  fordid. 

Left  this  fhould  feem  far  fetch'd,  to  thofc  who 
pleafe  themfelves  with  cavilling,  they  are  to  know, 
that  the  fame  general  councils  are  expreffed  by  other 
authors  in  other  words.  They  are  called  ''  *  1  he 
general  council  of  the  bifliops,  noblemen,  counts, 
all  the  wife  men,  elders,  and  people  of  the  whole 
-^  kingdom,"  in  the  timeoflna.  In  that  of  Ed- 
ward the  elder,  "  -f-  The  great  council  of  thebilhops, 
'^  abbots,  noblemen  and  people."  William  of 
Malmfbury  calls  them,  ''  j|  The  general  fenate  and 
*'  affembly  of  the  people."  Sometimes  they  are  in 
fhort  called  clergy  and  people  ;  but  all  exprefs  the 
fame  power,  neither  received  from,  nor  limitable  by 
kings,  who  are  always  faid  to  be  chofen  or  made, 
and  fometimes  depofed  by  them.  William  tiie 
Norman  found  and  left  the  nation  in  this  condition  : 
Henry  the  fecond,  John  and  Henry  third,  who  had 
nothing  but  what  was  conferred  upon  them  by  the 
fame  clergy  and  people,  did  fo  too.  Magna  '.haita 
could  give  nothing  to  the  people,  who  in  themfelves 

*  Commune  concilium  epifccporum,  proccrum,  comitum  ^^  om- 
nium fapientam,  fenioram  &  popalorum  tOLL'sre^ri     Ee^-^.  Heel- Hil. 

f  Magnum  concilium  epilcoporum,  abbatum,  fidelium,  proLcruni 
&  populorum. 

J  Senatum  generalem  &  populi  conventum. 

S  3  had 


tz62  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IlL 

h?.d  all ',  and  only  reduced  into  a  fmall  volume  the 
rights  which  the  nation  was  refolved  to  maintain ; 
brought  the  king  to  confefs,  they  were  perpetually 
inherent,  and  time  out  of  mind  enjoyed,  and  to 
fwear  that  he  would  no  way  violate  them  -,  if  he  did, 
he  wasipfo  fadro  excommunicated;  and  being  there- 
by declared  to  be  an  execrable  perjur'd  perfon,  they 
knew  how  to  deal  with  him.  This  adl  has  been 
confirmed  by  thirty  parliaments ;  and  the  proceed- 
ings with  kings,  who  have  violated  their  oaths,  as 
well  before  as  after  the  time  of  Henry  the  third,  which 
have  been  already  m.entioned,  are  fufficient  to  fhew^, 
that  England  has  always  been  governed  by  itfelf,  and 
jiever  acknowledged  any  other  lord  than  fuch  as  they 
thought  fit  to  fet  up. 

SECT.     XXIX. 

The  king  was  never  majler  of  the  foil. 

"^  HOSE  who  without  regard  to  truth,  refolve  to 
infift  upon  fuch  points  as  they  think  may  ferve 
their  defigns,  when  they  find  it  cannot  be  denied 
that  the  powers  before  mentioned  have  been  exer- 
cifed  by  the  Englifh  and  other  nations,  fay,  that  they 
were  the  conceflions  ol  kings,  who  being  m.afters  of 
the  foil,  might  beftow  parcels  upon  fome  perfons 
with  fuch  conditions  as  they  pleafed,  retaining  to, 
themfelves  the  fjpreme  dominion  of  the  whole:  and 
having  already,  as  they  think,  made  them  the  foun- 
tains of  honour,  they  proceed  to  make  them  alfo  the 
fountains  of  property;  and  for  proof  of  this  alledge, 
that  all  lands,  tlio'  held  of  mefne  lords,  do  by  their 
tenures  at  lail  refult  upon  the  king,  as  the  head 
from  whom  they  are  enjoyed.  This  might  be  of 
force  if  it  were  true  :  but  matters  of  the  highell 
importance  requiring  a  moft  evident  proofs  we  are 

to 


S'ta.  29;   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     26^ 

to  examine,  firfl,  if  it  bepoffible;  and  in  the  next 
place,  if  it  be  true. 

I.  For  the  firft ;  no  man  can  give  what  he  has 
not.  Whoever  therefore  will  pretend  that  the  king 
has  beftowed  this  propriety,  muft  prove  that  he  had 
it  in  himfelf.  I  confefs,  that  the  kings  of  Spain  and 
Portugal  obtained  from  the  pope  grants  of  the  terri- 
tories they  poflefled  in  the  Weft-Indies  3  and  this 
might  be  of  fome  ftrength,  if  the  pope  as  vicar  of 
Chrift  had  an  ahfokite  dominion  over  the  whole 
earth;  but  if  that  fail,  the  whole  falls  to  the  ground, 
and  he  is  ridiculoufly  liberal  of  that  which  no  way 
belongs  to  him.  My  bufinefs  is  not  to  difpute  that 
point ;  but  before  it  can  have  any  influence  upon 
our  affairs,  our  kings  are  to  prove,  that  they  are  lords 
of  England  upon  the  fame  title,  or  fome  other 
equivalent  to  it.  When  that  is  done  we  fliall  know 
tipon  whom  they  have  a  dependance,  and  may  at 
leifure  confider,  whether  we  ought  to  acknowledge, 
and  fubmit  to  fuch  a  power,  or  give  reafons  for  our 
refufal.  But  there  being  no  fuch  thing  in  our  pre- 
fent  cafe,  their  property  muft  be  grounded  upon 
fomethlng  elfe^  or  we  may  juftly  conclude  that  they 
have  none. 

In  order  to  this  'tis  hardly  worth  the  pains  to  fearch 
into  the  obfcure  remains  of  the  Britifii  hiftories:  for 
when  the  Romans  deferted  our  ifland,  they  did  not 
confer  the  right  they  had  (whether  more  or  lefs)  up- 
on any  man,  but  left  the  enjoyment  of  it  to  the  poor 

i  remainders  of  the  nation,  and  their  own  eftablilhed 
colonies,  who  were  grown  to  be  one  people  with  the 
natives.  The  Saxons  came  under  the  condud  of 
Henmft  and  Horfa,  who  feem  to  have  been  fturdy 

I  pirates;  but  did  not  (that  I  can  learn)  bear  any 
charadlers  in  their  perfons  of  the  fo  much  admired 

Ilbvereign  majefty,  that  fliould  give  them  an  abfolute 


/c"l 


264  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

dominion  or  propriety,  either  in  their  own  countrv, 
or  any  other  they  fliould  let  their  feet  upon.     They 
came  with  about  a  hundred  men,  and  choofing  rather 
to  ferve  Vortigern^%  than  to  depend  upon  what  they 
could  get  by  rapine  at  fea,  hved  upon  a  fmall  pro- 
portion of  land  by  him  allotted  to  them.     Tho'  this 
feems  to  be  but  a  flender  encouragemeiit,  yet  it  was 
enough  to  invite  many  others  to  follow  their  example 
and  fortune  •>  fo  that  their  number  increafing,  the 
county  of  Kent  was  given  to  them,  under  the  obli- 
gation of  ferving  the  Britons  in  their  wars.     Not  long 
after,  lands  in  -Northumberland  w^ere  beftowed  upon 
another  company  of  them  ^v/ith  the  fame  condition. 
This  was  all  the  title  they  had  to  what  they  enjoyed, 
till  they  treacheroufly  killed  four  hundred  and  iixty, 
or,  as  William  of  :Vlalmibury  fays,  three  hundred 
principal  men  of  the  Britilh  nobility,    and   made 
Vortigern  prifoner  -f-,  who  had  been  fo  much  their 
benefad:or,  that  he  feems  never  to  have  deferved  well 
but  from  them,  and  to  have  incens'd  the  Britons  by 
the  favour  he  fhew^'d  them^  as  much  as  by  the  worft 
,  of  his  vices.     And  certainly  actions  of  this  l<ind, 
compofed  of  falfhood  and  cruelty,  can  never  create 
a  right,  in  the  opinion  of  any  better  men  than  Fil- 
mer  and  his  difciples,  who  think  that  the  power  only 
is  to  be  regarded,  and  not  the  means  by  which  it  is 
obtained.     But  tho'  it  fhould  be  granted  that  a  right 
had  been  thus  acquired,  it  muft  accrue  to  the  nation, 
not  to  Hengift  and  Horfa.     If  fuch  an  acquifition  be 
called  a  conquefl,  the  benefit  muft  belong  to  thofe 
that  conquered.    This  was  not  the  work  of  two  men  ; 
and  thofe  who  had  been  free  at  home,  can  never  be 
thought  to  have  left  their  own  country,  to  fight  as 
flaves  for  the  glory  and  profit  of  two  men  in  another. 

«  Mat.  Vv^eftm.  Flor.  Hift.  f  Ibid. 

It 


Sea.  29.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    2% 

It  cannot  be  faid  that  their  wants  compelled  them, 
for  their  leaders  fufFer'd  the  fame,  and  could  not  be 
relieved  but  by  their  afliftance ;    and  whether  their 
enterprize  was  good  or  bad,  juft  or  unjuft,  it  was  the 
'fame  to  all :  no  one  man  could  have  any  right  pecu- 
liar to  himfelf,  unlefs  they  v/ho  gained  it,  did  confer 
it  upon  him :  and  'tis  no  way  probable,  that  they 
who  in  their  own  country   had  kept  their  princes 
within  very  narrow  limits,  as  has  been  proved,  fhould 
refign  themfelves,  and  all  they  had,  as  foon  as  they 
came  hither.     But  we  have  already  ftewn,  that  they 
always  continued  mod  obftinate  defenders  of  their 
liberty,  and  the  government  to  which  they  had  been 
accuftomed ;  that  they  managed  it  by  themfelves, 
and  acknowledged  no  other  laws  than  their  own. 
Nay,  if  they  had  made  fuch  a  refignation  of  their 
right,  as  was  neceffary  to  create  one  in  their  leaders, 
it  would  be  enough  to  overthrov/  the  propoiition  ; 
for  'tis  not  then  the  leader  that  gives  to  the  people, 
-but  the  people  to  the  leader.     If  the  people  had  not 
a  right  to  give  what  they  did  give,  none  w^as  con-  ^ 
ferred  upon  the  receiver:  if  they  had  a  right,  he  that 
jChould  pretend  to  derive  a  benefit  from  thence,  muft 
prove  the  grant,  that  the  nature  and  intention  of  it 
may  appear. 

2.  To  the  fecond  :  if  it  be  faid  that  records  teftify 
all  grants  to  have  been  originally  from  the  king  5  I 
anfwer,  that  tho'  it  were  confeffed,  ( which  i  abfo- 
lutely  deny,  and  affirm  that  our  rights  and  liberties  are 
.  innate,  inherent,  and  enjoy 'd  time  out  of  mind 
before  we  had  kings)  it  could  be  nothing  to  the 
queftipn,  which  is  concerning  reafon  and  juftice ; 
and  if  they  are  wanting,  the  defect  can  never  be 
fupplied  by  any  matter  of  fa(5l,  tho'  never  fo  clearly 
proved.  Or  if  a  right  be  pretended  to  be  grounded 
Upon  a  matter  of  faft,  the  thing  to  be  uroved  is,  that 

the 


265  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

the  people  did  really  confer  fuch  a  right  upon  the  firft? 
or  Ibnie  other  kings :  and  if  no  fuch  thing  do 
appear,  the  proceedings  of  one  or  more  kings  as  if 
they  had  it,  can  be  of  no  value.  But  in  the  prefent 
cafe,  no  fuch  grant  is  pretended  to  have  been  made, 
either  to  the  firft,  or  to  any  of  the  following 
kings ;  the  right  they  had  not  their  fucceflbrs  could 
not  inherit,  and  confequently  cannot  have  it,  or 
at  moft  no  better  title  to  it  than  that  of  ufur- 
pation. 

But  as  they  v^ho  enquire  for  truth  ought  not  to  de- 
ny or  conceal  any  thing,  I  may  grant  that  manors, 
&c.  were  enjoyed  by  tenure  from  kings  -,  but  that 
will  no  way  prejudice  the  caufe  I  defend,  nor  fignify 
more,  than  that  the  countries  which  the  Saxons  had 
acquired,  were  to.  be  divided  among  them  ;  and   to 
avoid  the  quarrels  that  might  arife,  if  every  man 
took  upon  him  to  feize  what  he  could,    a  certain 
method  of  m.aking  the  diftribution  was  neceffarily 
to  be  fixed  ;  and  it  was  fit,  that  every  man  fhould 
have  fomething  in  his  ov/n  hands  to  juflify  his  title 
to  what  he  pofTefTed,  according  to  which  controver- 
fies  fliould  be  determined.     This  mult  be  teftified 
by  fome  body,  and  no  man  could  be  fo  fit,  or  of  fo 
much  credit  as  hewho  v/as  chief  among  them;  and 
this  is  no  more  than  is  ufual  in  all  the  focieties  of 
the  world.     The  mayor  of  every  corporation,  the 
fpeaker  or  clerk  of  the  houfe  of  peers  or  houfe  of 
commons,  the  firft  prefident  of  every  parliament,  or 
prefidial  in  France  -,    the  conful,  burgermafter,  ad- 
voyer  or  bailiff  in  every  free  town  in  Holland,  Ger- 
many or  Switzerland,  fign  the  public  ads  that  pafs 
in  thofe  places.     The  dukes  of  Venice  and  Genoa 
do  the  like,  tho*  they  have  no  other  power  than  what 
is  conferred  upon  them,  and  of  themfelves  can  do 
little  or  nothing.     The  grants  of  our  kings  are  of  the 

.fame 


Sea.  29.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,     '^.(i^ 

fame  nature,  tho'  the  words  mcro  motu  noftro  feem 
to  imply  the  contrary  ;  for  kings  fpeak  always  in  the 
plural  number,  to   ihew  that  they  do  not  act  for 
tliemfelves,  but  for  the  focleties  over  which  they 
are  placed;  and  all  the  veneration  that  is,  or  can  be 
given  to  their  ads,  dees  not  exalt  them,  but  thole 
from  whom  their  authority  is  derived,  and  for  v/hom 
they  are  to  execule.     The  tyrants  of  the  Eaft  and 
other  barbarians  whofe  power  is  moft  abfolute,  fpeak 
in  the  fingle  number,  as  appears  by  the  decrees  of 
Nabuchodonofor,  Cyrus,  Darius  and  Ahafuerus  re- 
cited in  fcripture,  with  ot  hers  that  we  hear  of  daily 
from  thofe  parts:  but  whei%foever  there  is  any  thing 
of  civility  or  regularity  in  government,  the  prince 
uics   the  plural,  to  fhew  that  he  ads    in  a  public 
capacity.     From  hence,  fays  Crotius"*,  the  rights  of 
kings  to  fend  ambaiFadors,  make  leagues,  &c.  do 
arife  :    the  confederacies  made  by  them  do  not  ter- 
•minate  with  their  lives,    becaufe  they  are  not  for 
themfelves;  they  fpeak  not  in  their  own  perfons,  but 
as  reprefenting  their  people  ;  and  "  -f-  a  king  who  is 
"  depriv'd  of  his  kingdom,  lofes  the  right  of  fending 
"  ambaiTadors,"  becauie  he  can  no  lon2;er  fpeak  for 
thofe,  who  by  their  own  confent,  or   by  a  foreign 
force,  are  cut  off  from  him.     The  queilion  is  not 
whether  fuch  a  one  be  juftly  or  unjuftly  deprived 
(for  that  concerns  only  thofe  who  do  it  or  fuffer  it) 
but  whether  he  can  oblige  the  people ;  and  'tis  ridi- 
culous for  any  nation  to  treat  with  a  man  that  can- 
not perform  what  fhali  be  agreed,  or  for  him  to  flipu- 
late  that  which  can  oblige,  and  will  be  made  gocd 
only  by  himfelf. 

But  tho'  much  may  be  left  to  the  difcretion  cf 
kings  in  the  diftribution  of  lands  and  the  like,  yet 

*  Dejur.  bell. 

•f   Rex  regno  exutus,  jus  legandi  amittit.     G7ot, 

it 


268  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

it  no  way  diminiflies  the  right  of  the  people,  nor 
confers  any  upon  them  otherwife  to  difpofe  of  what 
belongs  to  the  public,  than  may  tend  to  the  com- 
mon good,  and  the  accomplifhment  of  thofe  ends 
for  which  they  are  entrufted.  Nay,  if  it  were  true, 
that  a  conquered  country  did  belong  to  the  crown, 
the  king  could  not  difpofe  of  it,  becaufe  'tis  annexed 
to  the  office,  and  not  alienable  by  the  perfon.  This 
is  not  only  found  in  regular  mixed  monarchies  (as  in 
Sweden,  where  the  grants  made  by  the  laft  kings 
have  been  lately  refcinded  by  the  general  affembly  of 
cftates,  as  contrary  to  law)  but  even  in  the  moft  ab- 
folute,  as  in  France,  where  the  prefent  king,  who 
has  ftretched  his  power  to  the  utmoft,  has  lately 
acknowledged  that  he  cannot  do  it ;  and  according  to 
the  known  maxim  of  the  ftate,  that  the  demeafnes 
of  the  crown,  which  are  defigned  for  the  defraying 
of  public  charges,  cannot  be  aliena.ed,  all  the 
grants  made  within  the  laft  fifteen  years  have  been 
annulled ;  even  thofe  who  had  bought  lands  of  the 
crown  have  been  called  to  account,  and  the  fums 
given  being  compared  with  the  profits  received,  and 
a  moderate  intereft  allowed  to  the  purchafers,  fo  much 
of  the  principal  as  remained  due  to  them  has  been 
repaid,  and  the  lands  refumed, 

SECT.     XXX.  S 

Henry  the  firfi  ivas  king  of  England  by  as  good  a  . 
title  as  any  of  his  predecejfors  or  fuccejfors. 

HAVING  made  it  appear,  as  I  fuppofe,  that 
the  antient  nobility  of  England  was  compofed 
of  fuch  men  as  had  been  ennobled  by  bearing  arms  in  the 
defence  or  enlargement  of  the  commonwealth  3  that 
the  dukes,  earls,  &c,  were  thofe  who  commanded 
them  i  that  they  and  their  dependants  received  lands 

for 


Seel.  30.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      269 

for  fuch  fervices,  under  an  obligation  of  continuing 
to  render  the  like,  and  according  to  their  feveral 
degrees  and  proportions,  to  provide  and  maintain 
horfes,  arms  and  men  for  the  fame  ufes  j  it  cannot 
be  denie4  that  they  were  fuch  gentlemen  and  lords  of 
manors,  as  we  now  call  commoners,  together  with 
the  freeholders,  and  fuch  as  in  war  were  found  moft 
able  to  be  their  leaders.  Of  thefe  the  Micklegemots, 
Wittenagemots,  and  other  public  affemblies  did  con- 
lift  ;  and  nothing  can  be  more  abfurd  than  to  afiign 
the  names  and  rights  of  duke,  earl  and  vifcount, 
which  were  names  of  offices,  to  thofe  who  have  not 
the  offices,  and  are  no  way  fit  for  them.  If  our 
author  therefore  had  faid,  that  fuch  as  thefe  who  had 
always  compofed  the  great  councils  of  our  nation, 
had  in  favour  of  Henry  the  firft,  beftowed  the  crown 
upon  him,  as  they  had  done  upon  his  father  and 
brother,  I  fhould  agree  with  him :  but  'tis  the  utmoft 
extravagance  to  fay,  that  he  who  had  neither  title 
nor  poiTeffion,  fhould  give  the  power  to  thofe  v/ho 
had  always  been  in  the  pofleffion  of  it,  and  exercifed 
it  in  giving  to  him  whatfoever  he  had.  But  I  moft 
wonder  he  fliould  fo  far  forget  himfelf,  to  call  this 
Henry  an  ufurper,  and  detrad:  from  the  validity  of 
his  a(fts,  becaufe  he  had  no  title  -,  whereas  there 
neither  is,  was,  or  can  be  an  ufurper  if  there  be  any 
truth  in  his  dodtrine  :  for  he  plainly  tells  us,  we  are 
only  to  look  to  the  power,  and  not  at  all  to  the 
means  and  ways  by  which  it  is  obtained  5  and  making 
no  difference  between  a  king  and  a  tyrant,  enjoins 
an  equal  fubmiffion  to  the  commands  of  both.  If 
this  were  only  a  flip  of  his  pen,  and  lie  did  really  take 
this  Henry  to  be  an  ufurper  becaufe  he  had  not  a  good 
title,  I  fhould  defire  to  know  the  marKS  by  which 
a  lawful  king  is  diftinguiftied  from  an  ufurper,  and 
in  what  a  juft  title  does  confift,  If  he  place  it  in  an 
2  •  hereditary 


2yo  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

hereditary  fucceflion,  we  ought  to  be  informed, 
whether  this  right  muft  be  deduced  from  one  univer- 
fal  lord  of  mankind,  or  from  a  particular  lord  of 
every  people  :  if  from  the  univerfal  lord,  the  fame 
defcent  that  gives  him  a  right  to  the  dominion  of 
any  one  country,  enfiaves  the  whole  world  to  him  : 
if  from  the  particular  lord  of  one  place,  proof  muft 
be  given  how  he  came  to  be  fo  :  for  if  there  was  a 
defedl  in  the  firft,  it  can  never  be  repaired,  and  the 
poffeffion  is  no  more  than  a  continued  ufurpation. 
But  having  already  proved  the  abfurdity  of  any  pre- 
tence to  either,  I  fhall  forbear  the  repetition,  and 
only  fay,  that  if  the  courfe  of  fucceflion  may  never  be  : 
juftly  interrupted,  the  family  of  Meroveus  could  not 
have  had  any  right  to  the  crown  of  France ;  Pepin 
was  an  uiurper,  if  it  muft  for  ever  have  continued  in 
the  defcendants  of  Meroveus  ;  and  Hugh  Capet  could 
have  no  title,  if  the  race  of  Pepin  might  not  be  dif-- 
poflefs'd.  I  leave  our  author  to  difpute  this  point 
with  the  king  of  France ;  and  when  he  has  fo  far  ' 
convinced  him  that  he  is  an  ufurper,  as  to  perfuade 
him  to  refign  his  crown  to  the  houfe  of  Auftria 
claiming  from  Pharamond,  or  to  that  of  Lorrain  as 
defcended  from  Pepin,  I  can  give  him  half  a  dozen 
more  knots  which  will  not  be  with  lefs  difficulty 
\intied,  and  which  inftead  of  eftabiiiliing  the  titles  ' 
of  fuch  kings  as  are  known  to  us,  will  overthrow  them  ' 
all,  unlefs  a  right  be  given  to  ufurpation,  or  the  con- 
fent  of  a  people  do  confer  it. 

But  if  there  is  fuch  a  thing  as  an  ufurper,  and  a  rule 
by  which  men  may  judge  of  ufurpation,  'tis  not 
only  lawful  but  neceflary  for  us  to  examine  the  titles 
of  fuch  as  go  under  the  name  of  kings,  that  we  may 
know  whether  they  are  truly  fo  or  not,  left  through 
ignorance  we  chance  to  give  the  veneration  and  obedi- 
Ciice  that  is  due  to  a  king,  to  one  who  is  not  a  king. 


Se6l.  30.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      271 

and  deny  it  to  him,  who  by  an  uninterruptible  line 
of  defcent  is  our  natural  lord,  and  thereby  prefer  the 
worftof  menand  our  moft  bitter  enemy  before  the 
perfon  we  ought  to  look  upon  as  our  father  :  and  if 
this  prove  dangerous  to  one  or  more  kings,  'tis  our 
author's  fault,  not  mine. 

If  there  be  no  ufurper,  nor  rule  of  diftinguifhing 
him  from  a  lawful  prince,  Filmer  is  the  worll  of  all 
triflers  and  impoftors,  who  grounds  his  arguments  in 
the  moft  ferious  matters  upon  what  he  efteems  to 
be  falfe  :  but  the  truth  is,  he  feems  to  have  fet  him- 
felf  againft  humanity  and  common  fenfe,  as  much 
as  againft  law  and  virtue ;  and  if  he  who  fo  fre- 
quently contradicts  himfelf,  can  be  faid  to  mean 
any  thing,  he  would  authorize  rapine  and  m.urder, 
and  perfuade  us  to  account  thofe  to  be  rightful  kings, 
who  by  treachery  and  other  unjuft  means  overthrow 
the  right  of  defcent  which  he  pretends  to  efteem  fa- 
cred,  as  well  as  the  liberties  of  nations,  which  by 
better  judges  are  thought  to  be  fo,  and  gives  the 
odious  name  of  ufurpation  to  the  advancement  of  one 
who  is  made  king  by  the  confent  of  a  willing  people. 

But  if  Henry  the  firft  were  an  ufurper,  I  defire  to 
know  whether  the  fame  name  belongs  to  all  our ' 
kings,  or  which  of  them  deferves  a  better,  that  we 
may  underftand  whofe  ads  ought  to  be  reputed  le- 
gal, and  to  whofe  defcent  we  owe  veneration,  or 
whether  we  are  wholly  exempted  from  all  :  for  I 
cannot  fee  a  pofllbility  of  fixing  the  guilt  of  ufurpa- 
tion upon  Henry  the  firft,  without  involving  many, 
if  not  all  our  kings  in  the  fame. 

If  his  title  was  not  good  becaufe  his  brother  Ro- 
bert was  ftill  living,  that  of  Rufus  is  by  the  fame 
reafon  overthrown  ;  and  William  their  father  being 
a  baftard  could  have  none.  This  fundamental  de- 
feft  could  never  be  repair'd  ;  for  the  fucceflbrs  could 

inh^it 


272  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

inherit  no  more  than  the  right  of  the  iirft,  which 
was  nothing.  Stephen  could  deduce  no  title  ^ither 
from  Norman  or  Saxon  5  whatfoever  Henry  the  fe- 
cond  pretended,  muft  be  from  his  mother  Maud, 
and  any  other  might  have  been  preferred  before  her 
as  well  as  he.  If  her  title  was  from  the  Normans, 
it  muil  be  void,  fince  they  had  none  ^  and  the  ftory 
of  Edgar  Atheling  is  too  impertinent  to  deferve 
mention.  But  however,  it  could  be  of  no  advantage 
to  her  5  for  David  king  of  Scotland,  brother  to 
her  mother  from  whom  only  her  tide  could  be  de- 
rived, was  then  alive  with  his  fon  Henry,  who  dy- 
ing: not  lono;  after,  left  three  fons  and  three  daughters, 
whofe  pofterity  being  diitributed  into  many  families 
of  Scotland,  remains  to  this  day  ;  and  if  proximity 
of  blood  is  to  be  confider'd,  ought  always  to  have 
been  preferred  before  her  and  her  defcendants,  unlefs. 
there  be  a  law  that  gives  the  preference  to  daughters 
before  fons.  What  right  foever  Henry  the  fecond 
had,  it  muft  neceiTarily  have  perifhed  with  him, 
all  his  children  having  been  begotten  in  manifeft 
adultery  on  Eleanor  of  Gafcony,  during  the  life  of 
Lewis  king  of  France  her  firft  huiband  :  and  no- 
thing could  be  alledged  to  colour  the  bufmefs,  but 
a  difpenfation  from  the  pope  diredtly  againil  the  law 
of  God,  and  the  words  of  our  baviour,  who  lays. 
That  a  wife  cannot  be  put  away  unlefs  for  adul- 
tery, and  he  that  marrieth  her  that  is  put  away 
committeth  adultery."  The  pollution  of  this 
fpring  is  not  to  be  cured  3  but  tho'  it  fhould  pafs 
unregarded,  no  one  part  of  the  fucceilion  fince  that 
time  has  remained  intire.  John  was  preferred  be- 
fore Arthur  his  elder  brother's  fon :  Edward  the 
third  was  made  king  by  the  depofition  of  his  father : 
Henry  the  fourth  by  that  of  Richard  the  fecond.  %If 
the  houfe  of  Mortimer  or  York  had  the  right,  Henry 

the 


<c 
cc 

cc 


S^d:,  so,     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     2ys 

the  fourth,  fifth,  and  fixth,  were  not  kings,  and  all 
who  claim  under  them  have  no  title.  However, 
Richard  the  third  could  have  none  ;  for  the  children 
of  his  elder  brother  the  duke  of  Clarence  were  then 
living.  The  children  of  Edward  the  fourth  may  be 
fufpedled  of  baftardy  ;  and  tho*  it  may  have  been 
otherwife,  yet  that  matter  is  not  fo  clear  as  things 
of  fuch  impor:ance  ought  to  be,  and  the  confequence 
may  reach  very  far.  But  tho*  that  fcruple  uerere- 
nibved,  'tis  certain  that  Henry  the  fevcnth  was  not 
king  in  the  right  of  his  wife  Elizabeth,  for  he  reign- 
ed before  and  after  her  ;  and  for  his  other  titles^ 
we  may  believe  Philip  de  Com  mines,  ^'  who  fays, 
*'  he  had  neither  crofs  nor  pile."  If  Henry  the 
eighth  had  a  right  in  himfelf,  or  from  his  mother, 
he  fliould  have  reigned  immediately  after  her  death, 
which  he  never  pretended,  nor  to  fucceed  till  his 
father  was  dead,  thereby  acknowledging  he  had  no 
right  but  from  him,  unlefs  the  parliament  and  peo- 
ple can  give  it.  The  like  may  be  faid  of  his  children. 
Mary  could  have  no  title  if  fhe  was  a  baftard,  be- 
gotten in  inceft  ;  but  if  her  mother's  marriage  was 
good  and  fhe  legitimate,  Elizabeth  could  have  none. 
Yet  all  thefe  were  lawful  kings  and  queens  -,  their 
afts  continue  in  force  to  this  day  to  ail  intents  and 
purpofes :  the  parliament  and  people  made  them  to 
be  fo,  when  they  had  no  other  title.  The  parlia- 
ment and  people  therefore  have  tlie  pov/er  of  making 
I  kings  :  thofe  who  are  fo  m.ade  are  not  ufurpers : 
we  have  had  none  but  fuch  for  more  than  fcven 
hundred  years.  They  were  therefore  lawful  kings, 
or  this  nation  has  had  none  in  all  that  time  j  and  if 
cur  author  like  this  conclufion,  the  account  from 
whence  it  is  drawn  may  without  difficalty  be  carried 
as  Iiigh  as  our  Englilli  hillories  do  reach. 

*  Mem.  de  Commin. 

Vol.  II.  T  -  This 


274  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

This  being  built  upon  the  fteddy  foundation  of 
law,  hiftory  and   reafon,  is  not  to  be  removed  by 
any  man's  opinion  ;  efpecialiy  by  one  accompanied 
with  fuch  circumftanccsas  Sir  Walter  Raleigh  was 
in  during  the  laft  years  of  his  life :    and    there  is 
fomething  of  bafenef^;,    as  well  as  prevarication,  in 
turning  the  words  of  an  eminent  perfon,  reduced  to 
great  difficulties,  to  a  fenfe  no  way  agreeing  with 
his   former  adions  or  writings,  and  no  lefs  tending 
to  impair  his  reputation  than  to  deceive  others.  Our 
author  is  highly  guilty  of  both,  in  citing  Sir  Walter 
E^aleigh  to  invalidate  the  great  charter  of  our  liber- 
ties, as  ''  begun  by  ufurpation,  and  fliewed  to  the 
*'  world  by  rebellion  3"  whereas  no  fuch  thing,  nor 
any  thing  like  it  in  word  or  principle  can  be  found 
in  the  v/orks  that  deferve  to  o;o  under  his  name.  The 
dialogue  in  que', ion,  v/ith  fome  other  fmall  pieces 
publiflied  after  his  death,  deferve  to  be  efteemed 
fpurious :  or  if,  from  a  delire  of  life,  when  he  knew 
his  head   lay  under  the  ax,  he  was  brought  to  fay 
things  no  w^ay  agreeing  with  what  he  had  formerly 
profefs'd,  they  ought  rather  to  be  burled  in  oblivion, 
than  produced  to  blemifh  his  memory.     But  that 
the  public  caufe  may  not  fuffer   by  his  fault,  'tis 
convenient  the  world  lliould  be  informed,  that  the' 
he  was  a  well  qualified  gentleman,  yet  his   morals 
were  no  way  ercad:,  as  appears  by  his  dealings  with 
the  brave  earl  gi  Effex.     And  he  was  fo  well  affift- 
ed  in  his  hiftory  of  the  world,  that  an  ordinary  man 
with  the  fame  helps  might  have  perform'd  the  fame 
things.     Neitlier  ought  it  to  be  accounted  ftrange, 
if  that  which  he  writ  by  himfelf  had  the  tinfture  of 
another  fpirit,  when  he  was  deprived  of  that  affift- 
ance,  tho'  his  life  had  not  depended  upon  the  will 
of  the  prince,  and  he  had  never  faid,  that  ^  *'*the 

*  See  Sir  W.  Kaleigh'i  E pi  file  t»  Ki^g  James. 

**  bonds 


S^a.  31.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      275 

*'  bonds  of  fubje(frs  to  their  kings  fhould  always  be 
*'  wrought  out  of  iron,  and  thofe  of  kings  to  their 
"  fabiedls  out  of  cobwebs." 

SECT.      XXXI. 

Ffre  nations  have  a  right  of  meetings  'xhen  a?id 
ivhere  they  plea Je^  imlefi  they  deprive  the7iijehes 
of  it. 


Perverted  judgment  always  leads  inen  into  a 
wrong  way,   and  perfuades  them  to  believe 
that  thofe  things  favour  their  caufe,  that  utterly  over- 
throv/  it.     For  a  proof  of  this,  I  deiire  our  author's 
words  may  be  confider'd.     ''  In  the  former  parlia- 
*'  ments,  fays  he,  inftituted  and  continued   fincc 
*'  Henry  the  firft  his  time,  is  not  to  be  found  the 
"  ufage  of  any  natural  liberty  of  the  people  :  for  all 
"  thofe  liberties  that  are  claim.ed  in  parliament,    are 
"  Hberties  of  grace  from  the  king,  and  not  the  liber- 
"  ties  oi  nature  to    the   people  :  for  if  the  liberty 
^'  were  natural,  it  would  give  power  unto  the  mul- 
*'  titude  to  aflemble  themfelves,  Vv^hen  and  where 
"  they  pleafed,  to  beflov/  the   fovereignty,  and  by 
''  pactions  to  limit  and  direcl  the   exercife  bf  it.'" 
And  I  fay  that  nations  being  naturally  free  m.ay  meet, 
when  and  where  they    pleafe ;  may  difpofe  of  the 
fovereignty,  and  may  dire(5t  or  limit  the  exercife  of 
it,  unlefs  by  their  own  adl  they  have  deprived  them- 
felves of  that  rig]  it :  and  there  could  never  have  been 
a  lawful  affembly  of  any  people  in  the  world,  if 
they  had  n.ot  had  that  pov.er  in  them.felves.     It  v/as 
proved  in  the  preceding  fedlionj  that  all  our  kings 
having  no  title,  were  no  more  than  what  the  nobi- 
lity and  people  made,  them  to  be  ^  that  they  could 
have^io  pov/er  but  vyhat  was  g^iven  to  them,  and 
pould  confer  none  except  what  they  had  received. 

T  a  '  If 


276  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HI. 

If  they  can  therefore  call  parliaments,  the  power  of 
calling  them  muft  have  been  given  to  them,  and 
could  not  be  given  by  any  w  ho  had  it  not  in  them- 
felves.    The  Ifraelites  met  together,  and  chofeEhud, 
Gideon,  Samfon,  Jephtha,  and  others,  to  be  their 
leaders,  whom  they  judged  fit  to  deliver  them  from 
their  enemies.     By  the  fame  right  they  affembled  at 
Mifpeth  to  make  war  againft  the  tribe  of  Benjamin, 
when  juftice  w^as  denied  to  be  done  againft  thofe 
who  had  villanoufly  abufed  the  Levite's  concubine. 
In  the  like  manner  they  would  have  made  Gideon 
king,  but  he  r^fufed.     In  the  fame  place  they  met, 
and  chofe  Saul  to  be  their  king.     He  being  dead, 
the  men  of  Judah  affembled  themfelves,  and  anoint- 
ed David  :  not  long  after,  all  the  tribes  met  at  He- 
bron, made  a  contraft  with  him,  and  received  him 
as  their  king.     In  the  fame  manner,  tho'  by  worfe 
counfel,  they  made  Abfalom   king.     And  the  like 
was  attempted  in  favour  of  Sheba  the  fon  of  Bichri, 
tho'  they  then  had  a  king  chofen  by  themfelves.  When 
they  found  themfelves  oppreffed  by  the  tributes  that 
had  been  laid  upon  them  by  Solomon,  they  met  at 
Shechem  j  and  being  difpleafed  with  Rehoboam's 
anfwer  to  their  com.plaints,  ten  of  the  tribes  made 
Jeroboam  king.     Jehu,  and   all  the  other  kings  of 
.  Ifrael,  whether  good  or  bad,  had  no  other  title  than 
was  conferred  upon  them  by  the  prevailing  part  of 
the  people  j  v/hich  could  not  have  given  them  any, 
unlefs  they  had  met  together  ;  nor  meet  together 
without  the  confent,  and  againft  the  will  of  thofe 
that  reigned,  unlefs  the  power  had  been  in  them- 
felves. 

Where  governments  are  more  exadly  regulated, 
the  power  of  judging  when  'tis  fit  to  call  the  fenate 
or  people  together,  is  refer'd  to  one  or  more  magif- 

trates  ;  as  in  Rome  to  the  confuls  or  tribunes,  in 

Athens 


Sea.  31.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      277 

Athens  to  the  archons,  and  in  Thebes  to  the  beo- 
tarches:  but  none  of  them  could  have  thefc  powers, 
unlefs  they  had  been  given  by  thofe  who  advanced 
them  to  the  magiftracies  to  which  they  were  an- 
nexed ',  nor  could  they  have  been  fo  annexed,  if 
thofe  who  created  them  had  not  had  the  rip;ht  in 
themfelves,  \i  thefe  officers  neglecfled  their  duty  of 
calHng  fuch  affemblies  when  the  public  affairs  re- 
quired, the  people  met  by  their  own  authority,  and 
punlflied  the  perfon,  or  abrogated  the  magiftracy, 
as  appears  in  the  cafe  of  the  decemviri,  and  many 
others  that  might  be  alledged,  if  the  thing  were  not 
fo  plain  as  to  need  no  further  proof  The  reafon  of 
this  is,  that  they  who  inflitute  a  magiftracy,  beft 
know  whether  the  end  of  the  inftitution  be  rightly 
purfued  or  not :  and  all  juft  magiftracies  being  the 
fame  in  effence,  tho'  differing  in  form,  the  fame  right 
muft  perpetually  belong  to  thofe  who  put  the  fove- 
reign  power  into  the  hands  of  one,  a  few,  or  many 
men,  which  is  what  our  author  calls  the  difpofal  of 
the  fovereignty.  Thus  the  Romans  did  vv^hen  they 
created  kings,  confuls,  military  tribunes,  didators, 
or  decemviri:  and  it  had  been  moft  ridiculous  to  fay, 
that  thofe  officers  gave  authority  to  the  people  to 
meet  and  choofe  them  5  for  they  who  are  chofen 
are  the  creatures  of  thofe  who  choofe,  and  are  nothing 
more  than  others  till  they  are  chofen.  The  laft  king 
of  Sweden,  Charles  Guftavus,  told  a  gentleman 
who  was  ambaffador  there,  that  the  Swedes  having 
made  him  king,  when  he  was  poor  and  had  nothing 
in  the  world,  he  had  but  one  work  to  do,  which 
was  fo  to  reign,  that  they  might  never  repent  the 
good  opinion  they  had  conceived  of  him.  They 
raitrht  therefore  meet,  and  did  meet  to  confer  the 
fovereignty  upon  him,  or  he  could  never  have  had 
it :  for  tho'  the  kingdom  be  hereditary  to  males  or 

T  3  females, 


273  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

females,  and  Iiis  mother  was  filler  to  the  orea^ 
Giiftaviis  ^  yet  having  married  a  fl  ranger  without 
the  confent  of  the  eftates,  ffie  performed  not  the  con- 
dition upon  which  women  are  admitted  to  the  fuc- 
celTion  :  and  thereby  falling  from  her  right,  he  pre- 
tended not  to  any.  The  adt  of  his  election  declares 
he  had  none,  and  gives  the  crown  to  him  and  th'e 
heirs  of  his  body,  with  this  farther  declaration,  that 
the  benefit  of  his  ekcfiion  fhoiiid  no  way  extend  to 
his  brother  prince  Adolphus ;  and  'tis  confefled  by 
all  the  Swediih  nation,  that  if  the  king  now  reigning 
fhould  die  without  children,  the  eftates  would  pro- 
ceed to  a  new  election. 

"Tis  rightly  obferv'd  by  our  author,  that  if  the 
people  might  meet^  and  give  the  fovereign  power, 
they  might  alfo  dired:  and  limit  it ;  for  they  did 
meet  in  this  and  otlier  countries,  th&y  did  confer  the 
fovereign  power,  they  did  limit  and  dired:  the  exer- 
cife ;  and  the  laws  of  each  people  fhew  in  what 
manner  and  meafure  it  is  every  where  done.  Thisis 
as  certain  in  relation  to  kings,  as  any  other  magiftrates. 
The  commifiion  of  the  Roman  didlators  was,  to 
take  care  ''  *  that  the  commonwealth  might  receive 
''  no  detriment,"  The  fame  was  fometimes  given 
to  the  confuls  :  king  Oifa's  confefijon,  that  he  was 
m.ade  king  "  -j*  to  preferve  the  public  liberty,"  ex- 
prefles  the  fame  thing :  and  Charles  Guftavus,  who 
faid  he  had  no  other  work,  than  to  crovern  in  fach  a 
manner,  that  they  who  had  made  him  king  might 
not  repent,  ihew^d  there  was  a  rule  which  he  ilood 
obliged  to  follow,  and  an  end  which  he  was  to  pro- 
cure, that  he  might  miCrit  and  preferve  their  good 
opinion.  This  power  of  conferring  the  fovereignty 
was  exerciied  in  France  by  thofe  who  made  Meroveus 

*  Nequid  detrimenti  refpublicaaccipiat.     T.  Liv, 

•f  in  veitrs  iiberEads  tuilionem.     Mat.  Par,  j 

king) 


Sed.  31.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      279 

king,  in  the  prejudice   of  the  two  grandchildren  of 

Pharamond  fons  to  Clodion  ;  by  thofe  who  excluded 

his  race  and  gave  the  crown  to  Pepin  j  bv  thofe  who 

depofed  Lewis  le  Di^bonair,  and  Charles  Ic  Grqs  -,  by 

thofe  v/ho  brought  in   five  kings,  that  were    either 

baftards  or  ftrangers^  between  him  and  C  hark s  le 

Simple;  by  thofe  who  rejeifled  his  race,  and  advanced 

Hugh  Capet 3  by  thofe  who  made  Henry  the  firit 

king,  to  the  prejudice  of  Robert  his  elder  brother, 

and  continued  the  crown  in  the  race  of  Henrv  for 

ten  generations,  whilfi:    the  defcendants   of  Robert 

were  only. dukes  of  Burgundy.     The  like  was  done 

in  Caftille  and  Arragon,  by  frequently  preferring  the 

younger  before  the  elder  brother;  the  defcendants  of 

females  before  thofe  of  the  male  line  in  the  fame  de- 

sree;  the  more  remote  in  blood  before  the  neareft  ; 
^  .  "  .  .  .  ~ 

and  fometimes  baftards  before  the  leo-itimate  iffue. 

The  fame  was  done  in  England  in  relation  to  every 

king,  fmce   the  coming  in  of  the  Normans,  as    I 

fliewed  in  the  lafl  fection,  and  other  places  of  this 


work. 


That  they  who  gave  the  fovereignty,  might  alfo 
circumfcribe  and  aired:  it,  is  nianifeft  by  the  feveral 
ways  of  providing  for  tlie  fucceflion  infiiituted  by 
feveral  nations.  Some  are  m.erely  eledlive,  as  the 
empire  of  Germany  and  the  kingdom  of  Poland  to 
this  day ;  the  kingdom  of  Denmark  till  the  year 
16 DO;  that  of  Sweden  till  the  time  of  Guilavus 
Ericfon,  who  delivered  that  nation  from  the  op- 
preffion  of  Chrifliern  the  fecond  the  cruel  king  of 
the  Danes.  In  others  the  eled:ion  was  confined  to 
one  or  more  famdlies,  as  the  i.ingdom  of  the  Goths 
in  Spain  to  the  Balthei  and  Amalthei  In  fome,  the 
eldell  man  of  the  reigning  family  was  preferred  be- 
fore tlie  neareft,  as  in  Scotland  before  the  time  of 

T  4  Kenne- 


\ 


28o  DISCOURSES       Chap.  111. 

^ennethus.  In  other  places  the  neareft  in  blood  is 
preferr'd  before  the  elder  if  more  remote.  In  fome, 
no  regard  is  had  to  females,  or  their  defcendants,  as 
in  France  and  Turky.  In  others  they  or  their  de- 
fcendants are  admitted,  either  fimply  as  well  as 
males ;  or  under  a  condition  of  marrying  in  the 
country,  or  with  the  confent  of  the  eflates,  as  in 
Sweden.  And  no  other  reafon  can  be  g-iven  for  this 
aimoil  infinite  variety  of  conftitutions,  than  that  they 
who  made  them  would  have  itfo  5  which  could  not 
be,  if  God  and  nature  had  appointed  one  general 
rale  for  all  nations.  For  in  that  cafe,  the  kingdom 
of  France  muft  be  elective,  as  well  as  that  of  Poland 
and  the  empire ;  or  the  empire  and  Poland  heredi- 
tary, as  that  of  France  :  daughters  mufl  fucceed  in 
France  as  well  as  in  England,  or  be  excluded  in 
England  as  in  France  ;  and  he  that  would  eftablifli 
one  as  tlie  ordinance  of  God  and  nature,  m.ufl 
neceflarily  overthrow  all  the  reft. 

A  father  exercife  of  the  natural  liberty  of  nations 
is  difcD  /ered  in  the  feveral  limitations  put  upon  the 
fovciegi  power.  Some  kings,  fays  Grotius,  have 
the  '*  lummum  imperium  fummo  modo"* ;"  others, 
^'  modo  non  fummo :"  and  amongft  thofe  that  are 
under  limil:ations,  the  degrees  as  to  more  or  lefs,  are 
^Imoft  infinite,  as  I  have  proved  already  by  the  ex- 
ample of  Arragon,  antient  Germany,  the  Saxon 
kings,  the  Normans,  the  kings  of  Cailille,  the  pre- 
fent  empire,  with  divers  others.  And  I  may  fafe- 
ly  fay,  that  the  antient  government  of  France  was 
much  of  the  fame  nature  to  the  time  of  Charles  the 
feventh,  and  Lewis  the  eleventh ;  but  the  work  of 
emancipating  themfelves,  as  they  call  it,  begun  by 
them,  is  nov/  brou2;ht  to  oerfedion  in  a  boundlefs 

*  De  jur.  bell.  &  pac. 

deva.ion 


Sea.  31.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     281 

elevation  of  the  king's  greatnefs  and  riches,  to  the  un- 
fpeakable  mifery  of  the  people. 

'Twere  a  folly  to  think  this  variety  proceeds  from 
the  concefiions  of  kings,  v/ho  naturally  delight  in 
power,  and  hate  that  which  croffes  their  will.  It 
might  with  more  reafon  be  imagined,  that  the 
Roman  confuls,  who  were  brought  up  in  liberty, 
who  had  contracted  a  love  to  their  country,  and 
were  contented  to  live  upon  an  equal  foot  with  their 
fellow  citizens,  fhould  confine  the  power  of  their 
magiftracy  to  a  year  3  or  that  the  dukes  of  Venice 
fliould  be  graciouily  pleafed  to  give  power  to  the 
Council  often  to  punifh  them  capitally  if  they  tranf- 
grelTed  the  laws,  than  that  kings  fhould  put  fuch 
fetters  upon  their  power,  which  they  fo  much  abhor ; 
or  that  they  would  fuffer  them,  if  they  could  be 
ealily  broken.  If  any  one  of  them  fhould  prove  fo 
moderate,  like  Trajan,  to  command  the  prefed: 
of  the  pretorian  guard  to  ufe  the  fword  for  him  if  he 
governed  well,  and  againfl  him  if  he  did  not,  it 
would  foon  be  refcinded  by  his  fuccefTor ;  the  law 
v;hich  has  no  other  flrength  than  the  adl  of  one  man, 
may  be  annulled  by  another.  So  that  nothing  docs 
more  certainly  prove,  that  the  laws  made  in  Teveral 
countries  to  reflrain  the  power  of  kings,  and  varicufly 
to  difpofe  of  the  fuccefHon,  are  not  from  them,  than 
the  frequent  examjples  of  their  fury,  who  have  ex- 
pofcd  themfelves  to  the  greateit  dangers,  and  brouglit 
infinite  miferies  upon  the  people,  through  the  de- 
fire  of  bredkin2;them.  Itmuft  therefore  be  concluded, 
that  nations  have  pov/er  of  meeting  together,  and  of 
conferring,  limiting,  and  directing  the  fovereignty ; 
^or  all  mufl  be  grounded  upon  molt  m^anifefl  injuflice 
and  ufurpaticn. 

No  mian  can  have  a  power  over  a  nation  otherwife 
than  de  jure,  or  de  facto.     He  v/ho  pretends  to  have 

a 


2S2  DISCOURSES        Chan.  Ill 

a  power  de  jure,  muft  prove  that  it  is  originally  in- 
herent in  him,  or  his  predecefTor  from  whom  he 
inherits^  or  that  it  was  juftly  acquired  by  him.  The 
vanity  of  any  pretence  to  an  original  right  appears 
fufficiently,  I  hope,  from  the  proofs  already  given, 
that  the  firft  fathers  of  manl;ind  had  it  not ;  or  if 
thev  had,  no  man  could  now  inherit  the  fame,  there 
being  no  man  able  to  make  good  the  genealogy  that 
fhould  give  him  a  right  to  the  fucceffion.  Befides, 
the  facility  we  have  of  proving  the  beginnings  of  all 
the  families  that  reign  among  us,  makes  it  as  abfurd 
for  any  of  them  to  pretend  a  perpetual  right  to  do- 
minion, as  for  any  citizen  of  London,  whofe  parents 
and  birth  we  know,  to  fay  he  is  the  very  man  Noah 
who  lived  in  the 'time  of  the  flood,  and  is  now  four 
or  five  thoufand  years  old. 

If  the  power  were  conferred  on  him  or  his  pre- 
deceiTors,  'tis  what  v/e  aflc ;  for  the  collation  can 
be  of  no  value,  unkfs  it  be  made  by  thofe  who 
had  a  right  to  do  it ;  and  the  original  right  by  de- 
fcent  failing,  no  one  can  have  any  over  a  free  people 
but  themfclves,  or  thofe  to  whom  they  have  given 
it. 

If  acquifition  be  pretended,  'tis  the  fame  thing; 
for  there  can  be  no  right  to  that  which  is  acquired, 
unlefs  the  right-  of  invading  be  proved  ;  and  that 
being  done,  nothing  can  be  acquired  except  what 
belonged  to  the  perfon  that  was  invaded,  and  that 
only  by  him  who  had  the  right  of  invading.  No 
man  ever  did  or  could  conquer  a  nation  by  his  own 
ftrength  -,  no  man  therefore  could  ever  acquire  a  per- 
fonal  right  over  any ;  and  if  it  was  conferred  upon 
him  by  thofe  who  made  the  conqueft  with  hiiii, 
they  were  the  people  that  did  it.  He  can  no  more 
be  faid  to  Irave  the  right  originally  in  and  from  him- 
felf,  than  a  maglitrate  of  R.ome  or  Athens  immedi- 
ately 


Sea.  31.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    -283 

^^ely  after  his  creation ;  and  having  no  other  at  the 
beginning,  he  can  have  none  to  eternity ;  for  the  nature 
of  it  muft  refer  to  the  original,  and  cannot  be  chanp-ed 
by  timo. 

Whatfoever  therefore  proceeds  not  from  the  con- 
fent  of  the  people,  muft  be  de  fado  only,  that  is, 
void  of  all  right  -,  and  'tis  impoiiible  there  ihould  not 
be  a  right  of  deftroying  that  which  is  grounded  up- 
on none  5  and  by  the  lame  rule  that  one  man  enjoys 
what  he  gained  by  violence,  another  may  take  it 
from  him,      Cyrus    overthrev/  the   Aflyrians  and 
Babylonians,   Alexander  the  Medes  and   Perfians ; 
and  if  they  had  no  right  of  making  war  upon  thofe 
nations,  the  nations  could  not  but  have  a  right  of  re- 
covering all  tliathad  been  unjuitly  taken  from  them, 
and  avenging   tlie   evils  they  had  fufiered.     If  the 
caufe  of  the  war  was  originally  juft,    and  not  cor- 
rupted by  an   intemperate  ufe  of  the  victory,  the 
conquer'd  people  was  perhaps  obliged  to  be  quiet  ; 
but  the  conquering  arinies  that  had   conferred  upon 
their  generals  what  they  had  taken  from^  their  ene- 
mies, might  as  juflly  expe6u  an  account  of  what 
they  had  given,  and  that  it  fliould  be  employed  ac- 
cording to  the  intention  of  the  givers,  as  the  people 
of  any  c\ty  might  do  from  their  regularly  created 
magiftrates ;  becaufe  it  was  as  impoiiible  for  Cyrus, 
Alexander  or  Csfar,  to  gain  a  power  over  the  armies 
they  led  v/ithout  their  confent,  as  for  Pericles,  Va- 
lerius, or  any  other  difarmed  citizen  to  gain  more 
pov/er  in  their  relpedtive  cities  than  was  voluntarily 
conferr'd  upon  them.     And  I  knov/  no  other  differ- 
ence between  kingdoms  fo  conftituted  by  conquering 
armies,  and  fuch  as  are  eftabli&ed  in  the  moft  order- 
ly manner,  than  that  the  firft  ufually  incline  more 
to  v/ar  and  violence,  ths  latter  to  juftice  and  peace. 
But  there  have  not  been  wanting  m.any  of  the  iirft  fort 

Z  (efpecially 


284  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

(efpecially  the  nations  coming  from  the  north)  who 
were  no  lefs  exa6l  in  ordaining  that  which  tended  to 
the  prefervation  of  Hbcrty,  nor  lefs  fevere  in  feeing  it 
punctually  performed,  than  the  moft  regular  com- 
monwealths that  ever  were  in  the  world.  And  it 
can  with  no  more  reafon  be  pretended,  that  the 
Goths  received  their  privileges  from  Alan  or  The- 
odoric,  the  Francs  from  Pharamond  or  JVIeroveus,  and 
the  Englifli  from  Ina  or  Etheked,  than  that  the 
liberty  of  Athens  was  the  gift  of  Themiilocles  or 
Pericles,  that  the  empire  of  Rome  proceeded  from 
the  liberality  of  Brutus  or  Valerius,  and  that  the 
commonwealth  of  Venice  at  this  day  fubfifts  by  the 
favour  of  the  Contarini  or  Morefini:  which  muH:  re- 
duce us  to  matter  of  right,  fince  that  of  fad:  void  of 
right  can  fignify  nothing. 

SECT.      XXXII. 

l^be  powers  of  Jdngs  a7'e  fo  n)arious  according  to  the 
conJlitutioJ2s  of  fever al  fates ^  that  no  confgue?2ce 
can  be  drawn  to  the  prejudice  or  advantage  of  any 
one,  merely  from  the  name, 

N  oppofition  to  v/hat  is  above  faid,  fome  alledge 
the  name  of  king,  as  if  there  were  a  charm  in 
the  v/ord;  and  our  author  feems  to  put  more  weight 
upon  it,  than  in  the  reafons  he  brings  to  fupport  his 
caufe.  But  that  we  may  fee  there  is  no  efficacy 
in  it,  and  that  it  conveys  no  other  right  than  what 
particular  nations  may  annex  to  it,  we  are  to  -con- 
fider, 

I.  That  the  moft  abfolute  princes  that  are  or  have 
been  in  the  world,  never  had  the  name  of  king  -, 
whereas  it  has  been  frequently  given  to  thofe  whofe 
powers  has  been  very  much  reftrained.  The  Cacfars 
were  never  called  kings,  till  the  lixth  age  of  Chrifti- 

anity : 


Sea.  31.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      285 

anity  :  the  Califs  and  Soldan  of  Egypt  and  Babylon, 
the  great  Turk,  the  Cham  of  Tartary,  or  the  great 
Mogol  never  took  that  name,  or  any  other  of  the 
fame  fignification.  The  Czar  of  Mofcovy  has  it  not, 
tho'  he  is  as  abfolate  a  monarch,  and  his  people  as 
miferable  flaves  as  any  in  the  world.  On  the  other 
fide,  the  chief  magiftrates  of  Rome  and  Athens  for 
fome  time,  thofe  of  Sparta,  Arragon,  Sweden,  Den- 
mark and  England,  who  could  do  nothing  but  by 
law,  have  been  called  kings.  This  may  be  enough 
to  fhew,  that  a  name  being  no  way  effential,  what 
title  focver  is  given  to  the  chief  magiftrate,  he  can 
have  no  other  power  than  the  laws  and  cuftoms  of 
his  country  do  give,  or  the  people  confer  upon  him. 

2.  The  names  of  magiftrates  are  often  changed, 
tho*  the  power  continue  to  be  the  fame :  and  the 
powers  are  fometimes  alter 'd  tho'  the  name  remain. 
When  Odavius  Caefar  by  the  force  of  a  mad  cor- 
rupted foldiery  had  overthrown  all  law  and  right, 
he  took  no  other  title  in  relation  to  military  affairs 
than  that  of  Imperator,  which  in  the  time  of  liberty 
was  by  the  armies  often  given  to  pretors  and  con- 
fuls  :  In  civil  matters  he  was,  as  he  pretended,  * 
content  with  the  power  of  tribune  ;  and  the  like 
was  obferved  in  his  fucceffor,  who  to  new  invented 
ufurpations  ''  gave  old  and  approved  names  ||."  Cn 
the  other  fide,  thofe  titles  which  have  been  render'd 
odious  and  execrable  by  the  violent  exercife  of  an 
abfolute  power,  are  fometimes  made  popular  by 
moderate  elimitations  3  as  in  Germany,  where,  tho* 
the  monarchy  feem  to  be  as  well  temper'd  as  any, 
the  princes  retain  the  fame  names  of  Imperator,  Csfar 
and  Auguftus,  as  thofe  had  done,  who  by  the  ex- 

*  Tribunitia  poteflatecontentus,     C,  Tacit. 
C.  Tacit. 

cefs 


226  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HI. 

cefs  of  their  rage   and  fury  had  defolated  and  cor' 
riipted  the  beft  part  of  the  world. 

Sometimes  the  name  is  changed,  tho'  the  power 
in  all  refpec^ls  continue  to  be  the  fame.  The  lords 
of  *  Caftiile  had  for  many  ag-es  no  other  title  than 
that  of  count ;  and  when  the  nobility  and  people 
thought  good,  they  changed  it  to  that  of  king,  with- 
out any  addition  to  the  power. 

The  foverei^n  masiitrate  in  Poland,  was  called 
duke  till  within  the  laR  two  hundred  years,  when 
they  gave  the  title  of  king  to  one  of  the  Jagellan  fa- 
mily ;  which  title  has  continued  to  this  day,  tho' 
without  any  change  in  the  nature  of  the  magiftracy. 
And  I  prefume,  no  wife  man  will  think,  that  if  the 
Venetians  fhould  give  the  name  of  king  to  their 
duke,  it  could  confer  any  other  power  upon  him 
than  hehas  already,  unlefs  more  fhouldbe  conferr'd 
by  the  authority  of  the  Great  Council. 

3 .  The  fame  names  which  in  fome  places  denote 
the  fupreme  magiiiracy,  in  others  are  fubordinate 
or  merely  titular.  In  England,  France,  and  Spain, 
dukes  and  earls  are  fubjeds :  in  Germany  the  elec- 
tors and  princes  who  are  called  by  thofe  names  are 
little  lefs  than  fovereigns  ;  and  the  dukes  of  Savoy, 
Tufcany,  Mufcovy  and  others,  acknov/ledge  no 
fuperior,  as  well  as  thofe  of  Poland  and  Caftille  had 
none,  when  they  went  under  thofe  titles.  The 
fame  may  be  faid  of  kings.  Some  are  fubjed  to  a 
foreign  pov/er,  as  divers  of  them  were  fubjed:  to 
the  Perfian  and  Babylonian  monarchs,  who  for  that 
reafon  were  called  the  kings  of  kings.  Some  alfo 
are  tributaries ;  and  when  the  Spaniards  firil;  landed 
in  America,  the  great  kings  of  Mexico  and  Peru 
had  many  others  under  them.  Threefcore  and  ten 
kings  gathered  up  meat  under  the  table  of  Adoni- 

*  Saavedra.  Mariana,  Zurita. 

bezek. 


Sea.  32.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      287 

bezek.     The  Romans  had  many  kings  depending 
upon  them.     Herod  and  thofe  of  his  race  were  of 
this  number  5  and  the  difpute  between  him  and  his 
fons  Ariftobukis    and   Alexander  was  to  be  deter- 
mined by  them,  neither  durfl  he  decide  the  matter 
till  it  was  referred  to    him.     But  a  right  of  appeal 
did  ftill   remain,  as  appears  by  the  cafe  of  St.  Paul 
when  Agrippa  w'as  king.     The  kings  of  Mauritania 
from  the  time  of  Maflinifla,  were  under  the  like  de- 
pendance  :  Jugurtha  went  to  Rome  to  juilify  him- 
felf  for  the  death  of  Micipfa  :  Juba  was  command- 
ed by  the  Roman  m.agiftrates,  Scipio,  Petreius  and 
Afranius :  another  Juba  was  made  king  of  the  fame 
country  by  Auguftus,  and  Tiridates  of  Armenia  by 
Nero ;  and  infinite  examples  of  this  nature  may  be 
alledged.     Moreover,  their  powers  are  varioufly  re- 
gulated, according  to  the  variety  of  tem^pers  in  na- 
tions and   ages.     Some  have  reftrained  the  powders 
that  by  experience  were  found  to  be   exorbitant ; 
others  have  diffolved  the  bonds  that  were  laid  upon 
them  :    and  laws  relating  to  the  inftitution,  abro- 
gation, enlargement  or  reftridion  of  the  regal  power, 
would  be  utterly  infiornificant   if  this  could  not  be 
done.     But  fuch  laws  are  of  no  effedl  in  any  other 
country  than  where  they  are  made.     The  lives  of 
the  Spartans  did  not  depend  upon  the  will  of  Age- 
iilaus  or  Leonidas,  bccaufe  Nabuchodonofor  could 
kill  or  fave  whom  he  pleafed  :  and  tho'  the  king  01 
Morocco  may  flab  his  fubje6ls,  throw  tliem  to  the 
lions,  or  hang  them  upon  tenterhooks ;  yet  a  king 
of  Poland  would  pn'obably  be  called  to  a  fevere  ac- 
count, if  he  fhould  unjuftly  kill  a  fingle  man. 


SECT 


2SB  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

SEC    T.      XXXIII. 

The  liberty  of  a  people  is  the  gift  of  God  a  fid  nature. 

¥  any  man  aflc  how  nations  come  to  have  the 
power  of  doing  thefe  things;  lanfwer,  thathber- 
ty  being  only  an  exemption  from  the  dominion  of 
another,  the  queftion  ought  not  to  be,  how  a  nation 
can  come  to  be  free,  but  how  a  man  comes  to  have 
a  dominion  over  it ;  for  till  the  right  of  dominion  be 
proved  and  juftified,  liberty  fubfifts  as  arifing  from 
the  nature  and  being  of  a  man.  Tertuliian  fpeak- 
ing  of  the  emperors  fays,  '•  Ab  eo  imperium  a  quo 
"  fpiritus  /*  and  we  taking  man  in  his  firft  condi- 
tion may  juftly  fay,  *'  ab  eo  libertas  a  quo  fpiritus;" 
for  no  man  can  owe  more  than  he  has  received.  The 
creature  having  nothing,  and  being  nothing  but 
what  the  Creator  makes  him,  muft  ovvx  all  to  him, 
and  nothing  to  any  one  from  whom  he  has  received 
nothing.  Man  therefore  muft  be  naturally  free, 
unlefs  he  be  created  by  another  power  than  we  have 
yet  heard  of.  The  obedience  due  to  parents  arifes 
from  hence,  in  that  they  are  the  inftruments  of  our 
generation  ;  and  we  are  inftrucSted  by  the  light  of 
reafon,  that  we  ought  to  make  great  returns  to  thofe 
from  whom  under  God  we  have  received  all.  When 
they  die  wx  are  their  heirs,  we  enjoy  the  fame  rights, 
and  devolve  the  fame  to  our  pofterity.  God  only 
who  confers  this  right  upon  us,  can  deprive  us  of  it : 
and  we  can  no  way  underftand  that  he  does  fo,  un- 
lefs he  had  fo  declared  by  exprefs  revelation,  or  had 
fet  fome  diftinguifliing  marks  of  dominion  and  fub- 
jedlion  upon  men  ^  and,  as  an  ingenious  perfon  not 
long  iince  faid,  caufed  fome  to  be  born  w  ith  crowns 
upon  their  heads,  and  all  others  with  faddles  upon 
their  backs.     This  liberty  therefore  muft  continue, 

2  -     till 


Sed.  ^s    CONCERNING  GOVERNIMENT.      289 

till  it  be  either  forfeited  or  willingly  refigned.  The 
forfeiture  is  hardly  comprehenfible  in  a  multitude 
that  is  not  entered  into  any  fociety  ;  for  as  they  are 
all  equal,  and  **  equals  can  have  no  right  over  each 
*'  other  *,  no  man  can  forfeit  anything  to  one  v/ho 
can  juftly  demand  nothing,  unlefs  it  may  be  by  a 
perfonal  injury,  v/hich  is  nothing  to  this  cafe ;  be- 
caufe  where  there  is  no  fociety,  one  man  is  not  bound 
by  the  actions  of  another.  All  cannot  join  in  the 
fame  ad:,  hecaufe  they  are  joined  in  none  ;  or  if  they 
fliould,  no  man  could  recover,  much  lefs  tranfmit 
the  forfeiture  :  and  not  being  tranfmitted,  it  periflies 
as  if  it  had  never  been,  and  no  man  can  claim  any 
thing  from  it. 

'Tvv^ill  be  no  lefs  difficult  to  bring  refignation  to 
be  fabfervient  to  our  author's  purpofe  ;  for  men 
could  not  refign  their  liberty,  unlefs  they  naturally 
had  it  in  themfelves.  Refignation  is  a  publick  de- 
claration of  their  aifent  to  be  governed  by  the  perfon 
to  whom  they  refign  ;  that  is,  they  do  by  that  adt 
conftitute  him  to  be  their  governor.  This  neceifa- 
rily  puts  us  upon  the  inquiry,  why  they  do  reiign, 
how  they  will  be  governed,  and  proves  the  gover- 
nor to  be  their  creature  ;  and  the  right  of  difpofing 
the  government  mufl  be  in  them,  or  they  who  re- 
ceive it  can  have  none.  This  is  fo  evident  to  com- 
mon fenfe,  that  it  were  impertinent  to  afK  who  m.ade 
Carthage,  Athens,  Rome  or  Venice  to  be  free  cities. 
Their  charters  were  not  from  men,  but  from  God 
and  nature.  When  a  number  of  Phoenicians  had 
found  a  port  on  the  coaft  of  Africa,  they  might  per- 
haps agree  with  the  inhabitants  for  a  parcel  of  ground, 
|,but  they  brought  their  liberty  with  them.  When 
a  company  of  Latins,  Sabines  and  Tufcansmet  toge- 
ther upon  the  banks  of  the  Tiber,  and  chofe  rather 

*  Par  In  carem  non  habet  imperiumt 

Vol.  II.       '  U  to 


290  DISCOURSES       Chap.  111. 

to  build  a  city  for  themfelves,  than  to  live  in  fuch 
as  were  adjacent,  they  carried  their  Kberty  in  their 
own  breafts,  and  had  hands  and  fwords  to  defend  it. 
This  was  their  charter  ;  and  Romulus  could  confer 
no  more  upon  them,  than  Dido  upon  the  Carthagi- 
nians. When  a  multitude  of  barbarous  nations  in- 
fefted  Italy,  and  no  protection  could  be  expeded 
from  the  corrupted  and  perilhing  empire,  luch  as 
agreed  to  feek  a  place  of  reluge  in  the  fcatter'd 
iflands  of  the  Adriatic  gulf,  had  no  need  of  any 
man's  authority  to  ratify  the  inftitution  of  their 
government.  They  who  were  the  formal  part  of 
the  city,  and  had  built  the  material,  could  not  but 
have  a  right  of  governing  it  as  they  pleafed,  fince  if 
they  did  amifs,  the  hurt  was  only  to  themfelves.  'lis 
probable  enough  that  fome  of  the  Roman  emperors, 
as  lords  of  the  foil,  might  have  pretended  to  a  do- 
minion over  them,  if  there  had  been  any  colour 
for  it :  but  nothing  of  that  kind  appearing  in  thir- 
teen hundred  years,  we  are  not  like  to  hear  of  any 
fuch  cavils.  'Tis  agreed  by  mankind,  that  fub- 
jedlion  and  protection  are  relative  3  and  that  he  who 
cannot  protect  thole  that  are  under  him,  in  vain  pre- 
tends to  a  dominion  over  them.  The  only  ends  for 
which  governments  are  conftituted,  and  obedience 
render'd  to  them,  are  the  obtaining  of  juftice  and 
protedlion  ;  and  they  who  cannot  provide  for  both, 
give  the  people  a  right  of  taking  iuch  ways  as  belt 
pleafe  themfelves,  in  order  to  their  own  fafety. 

The  matter  is  yet  more  clear  in  relation  to  thofe 
who  never  v/ere  in  any  fociety,  as  at  the  beginning, 
or  renovation  of  the  world  after  the  flood  ^  or  who 
upon  the  diffolution  of  the  ibcieties  to  which  they 
did  once  belong,  or  by  fome  other  accident  have 
been  obli2:ed  to  feek  new  habitations.  Such  were 
thofe  who  went  from  Babylon  upon  the  confufion 

of 


Sea.  3  3 .    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      2  9 1 

of  tongues,  thofe  who  efcaped  from  Troy  when  it 
was  burnt  by  the  Grecians  ;  almoft  all  the  nations 
of  Europe,  with  many  of  Afia  and  Africa  upon  the 
difTolution  of  the  Roman  empire.  To  which  may 
be  added  a  multitude  of  northern  nations,  who, 
when  they  had  increafed  to  fuch  numbers  that  their 
countries  could  no  longer  nourifh  them,  or  becaufe 
they  wanted  ikill  to  improve  their  lands,  were  fent 
out  to  provide  for  themfelves ;  and  having  done  fo, 
did  eredt  many  kingdoms  and  ftates,  either  by  them- ' 
felves,  or  in  union  and  coalition  with  the  antient 
inhabitants. 

'Tis  in  vain  to  fay,  that  wherefoever  they  came, 
the  land  did  belong  to  fome  body,  and  that  they  who 
came  to  dwell  there  muft  be  fubjed:  to  the  laws  of 
thofe  who  were  lords  of  the  foil  -,  for  that  is  not 
always  true  in  faft.  Some  come  into  defert  coun- 
tries that  have  no  lord,  others  into  fuch  as  are  thinly 
peopled,  by  men  who  knowing  not  how  to  improve 
their  land,  do  either  grant  part  of  it  uponeafy  terms 
to  the  new  comers,  or  grow  into  a  union  with  them 
in  the  enjoyment  of  the  whole  ;  and  hiftories  furnifh 
us  with  infinite  examples  of  this  nature. 

If  we  will  look  into  our  own  original,  without 
troubling  our  felves  v/ith  the  fenfelefs  ftories  of  Sa- 
mothes  the  fon  of  Japhet  and  his  magicians,  or  the 
giants  begotten  by  fpirits  upon  the  thirty  daughters 
of  Danaus  fent  from  Phoenicia  in  a  boat  without  fail, 
oars  or  rudder,  we  fliall  find  that  wh^n  the  Ro- 
mans abandoned  this  ifland,  the  inhabitants  were  left 
to  a  full  liberty  of  providing  for  themfelves  :  and 
whether  Vv^e  deduce  our  original  from  them  or  the 
Saxons,  or  from  both,  our  anceftors  were  perfe6lly 
free  -,  and  the  Normans  having  inherited  the  fame 
right  when  they  came  to  be  one  nation   with  the 

U  2  former. 


£92  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

former,  we  cannot  but   continue  fo  flill  unlefs  we 
have  enflaved  our  felves. 

Nothing  is  more  contraiy  to  reafon  than  to  ima- 
gine this.     When  the  fierce  barbarity  of  the  Saxons 
came  to  be  foftened  by  a  more  gentle  climate,  the  arts 
and  religion  they  learnt,  taught  them  to  reform  their 
manners,  and  better  enabled  them  to  frame  laws 
for  the  prcfervation  of  their  liberty,  but   no   way 
diminifhed  their  love  to  it :  and  tho'  the  Normans 
might  defire  to  get  the  lands  of  thofe  who  had  joined 
with  Harold,  and  of  others,  into  their  hands  -,  yet 
when  they  were  fettled  in  the  country,  and  by  mar- 
riac^es  united  to  the  antient  inhabitants,  thev  became 
true  Englifhmen,  and  no  lefs  lovers   of  liberty  and 
refolute  .  defenders  of  it  than  the  Saxons  had  been. 
There  was  then  neither  conquering  Norman  nor  con- 
quered Saxon,  but  a  great  and  brave  people  compofed 
of  both,  united  in  blood  and  intereflin  the  defence  of 
their  common  rights,  which  they  fo  well  maintain- 
ed, that  no  prince  fince  that  time  has  too  violently 
encroached  upon  them,  who,  as  the  reward  of  his 
folly,  has  not  lived  miferably  and  died  fhamefully. 
Such  adions  of  our  anceftors  do  not,  as  I  fuppofe, 
favour  much  of  the  fubmiilion  which    patrimonial 
Haves  do  ufually  render  to  the  will  of  their  lord.  On 
the  contrary,  whatfoever  they  did  was  by  a  power 
inherent  in  themi felves  to  defend  that  liberty  in  which, 
they  were  born.     All  their  kings  were  created  upon 
the  fame  condition,  and  for  the  fame  ends.     Alfred 
acknowledged  he  found  and  left  them  perfedly  free; 
and  the  confeilion  of  Offa,  that  they  had  not  made 
him  king  for  his  own  merits,  but  for  the  defence  of 
their  liberty,  comprehends  all  that  were  before  and 
after  him.     They  well  knew  how  great  the  honour 
was,  to  be  made  head  of  a  great  people,  and  rigo- 
roully    exad:ed   the   performance  of  the  ends  for 

which 


Sea.  34.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      293 

which  fuch  a  one  was  elevated,  feverely  punifhing 
thofe  who  bafely  and  wickedly  betray'd  the  trufi 
repoled  in  them,  and  violated  all  that  is  moft  facred 
amons:  men;  which  could  not  have  been  iinlefs  thev 
were  naturally  free,  for  the  liberty  that  has  no  being 
cannot  be  defended. 

SECT.     XXXIV. 

No  ve/7erafion  paid^  or  honour  conferred  upon  a  juji 
and  lauftd  niagijlrate^  can  duniniJJo  the  libertv  of 
a  nation, 

O  M  E  have  fuppofed,  that  tho'  the  people  be 
^^_^  naturally  free,  and  magiftrates  created  by  them, 
they  do  by  fuch  creations  deprive  themfelves  of  that 
natural  liberty  -,  and  that  the  names  of  King,  So- 
vereign Lord,  and  Dread  Sovereign,  being  no  way 
confillent  with  liberty,  they  who  give  fuch  titles  do 
renounce  it.  Our  author  carries  this  very  far,  and 
lays  great  weight  upon  the  fubmiffive  language  ufed 
by  the  people,  when  they  ''  humbly  crave  that  his 
*'  majefty  would  be  pleafed  to  grant  their  accuflomed 
*'  freedom  of  fpeech,  and  accefs  to  his  perfon ;" 
and  "  give  the  name  of  fupplications  and  petitions  to 
''  the  addreffes  made  to  him :"  whereas  he  anfwers 
in  the  haughty  language  of  "  Le  Roy  le  veut,  Le 
*'  Roy  s'avifera,"  and  the  like.  But  they  who  talk 
at  this  rate,  (hew,  that  they  neither  underftand  the 
nature  of  magiftracy,  nor  the  practice  of  nations. 
Thofe  who  have  lived  in  the  highefl:  exercife  of  their 
liberty,  and  have  been  mofl:  tenacious  of  it,  have 
thought  no  honour  too  great  for  fuch  magiftrates  as 
were  eminent  in  the  defence  of  their  rights,  and 
were  fet  up  for  that  end.  The  name  of  dread  fove- 
reign  might  juftly  have  been  given  to  a  Roman 
didtator,  or  conful,  for  they  had  the  fovereign  autho- 

U  3  rity 


294  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

rity  in  their  hands,  and  power  fufficient  for  its  exe- 
cution.    Whiift  their  magiftracy  continued,    they 
were  a  terror  to  the  fame  men,  whofe  axes  and  rods 
had  been  a  terror  to  them  the  year  or  month  before, 
and  might  be  fo  again  the  next.  The  Romans  thought 
they  could  not  be  guilty  of  excefs  in  carrying  the 
power  and  veneration  due  to  their  dictator  to  the 
hiehefl:  and  Livv  tells  us,  that  his  '*  ^  Edidswere 
^*  efteemed  facred."     I  have  already  fl:iewii  that  this 
haughty    people,    who   might   have   commanded, 
condefcended  to  join  v/ith  their  tribunes  in  a  petition 
to  the  didlator  Papirius,  for  the  life  of  Qiiintus  Fa- 
bius,  who  had  fought  a  battle  in  his  abfence,  and 
without  his  order,  tho'  he  had  gained  a  great  and 
memorable  vidtory.     The  fame  Fabius,  when  con- 
ful,  was  commended  by  his  father  QJ'abius  Maxi- 
mus,  for  obliging  him  by  his  lid:ors  to  difmount 
from  his  horfe,  and  to  pay  him  the  fame  refped  that 
was  due  from  others.     The  tribunes  of  the  people, 
who  were  inftituted  for  the  prefervation  of  liberty, 
were  alfo  efteemed  facred  and  inviolable,  as  appeai  s  by 
that  phrafe,   "  Sacrofanfta  tribunorum  potcilas,"  fo 
common  in  their  anticnt  writers.     No  man,   Ipre- 
fume,  thinks  any  monarchy  more  limited,  or  more 
clearly  derived  from  a  delegated  power,  than  that  of 
the  German  emperors  -,  and  yet  bacra  Cscfarea  Ma- 
jeftas  is  the  public  fUle.     Nay,  the  Hollanders  at 
this  dav  call  their  bursermafcers,  tho'  thev  fee  them 
ielling  herring  or  tar,  "  High  and  mighty  lords,"  as 
foon  as  they  are    advanced  to  be  of  tlie   thirty-fix, 
forty-two    or    forty-ei2:ht    m.agiiliratcs    of  a    fmall 
town,     'Tis  no  wonder  therefore,  if  a  c:reat  nation 
ihould  think  it  conducing  to  their  own  glory,  to  give 
magnificent  titles,  and  ufe  fubm.lflive  language  to 
that  one  man,  whom  they  fet  up  to  be  their  headj 

*  Ediduin  Diclatorl?  pro  nu'.r.ine  obrei  vatjm,     ///,'/.  I, 

3 


moft 


Sea.  34.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     295 

moft  efpecially,  if  we  conlider  that  they  came  from 
a  country  where  fuch  titles  and  language  were  princi- 
pally invented. 

Among  the  Romans  and  Grecians  we  hear  nothing 
of  Majelly,  Highnefs,  Serenity  and  Excellence 
approDriated  to  a  fingle  pcrlbn,  but  receive  them 
from  Germany  and  other  northern  countries.  We 
find  "  Majeiks  populi  Romani,"  and  ''  Majeftas 
*'  imperii,"  in  their  beft  authors ;  but  no  man  fpeak- 
ing  to  Julius  or  Auguftus,  or  even  to  the  vaineft  of 
their  fucceffi3rs,  ever  uied  thofe  empty  titles,  nor 
took  upon  themfelves  the  name  of  fervants,  as  we  do 
to  every  fellow  we  meet  in  the  flreets.  When  fuch 
ways  of  fpeaking  are  once  introduced,  they  muft 
needs  fwell  to  a  more  than  ordinary  height  in  all 
tranfacl'ions  with  princes.  Moft  of  them  naturally 
delight  in  vanity,  and  courtiers  never  fpeak  more 
truth,  than  when  they  moft  extol  their  mafters,  and 
aliume  to  themfelves  the  names  that  beft  exprefs  the 
moft  abjed:  ilavery.  Thefe  being  brought  into  mode, 
like  all  ill  cuftoms,  increafe  by  ufe  -,  and  then  no 
man  can  omit  them  without  bringing  that  hatred  and 
danger  upon  himfelf,  which  few  will  undergo,  ex- 
cept for  fomething  that  is  evidently  of  great  importance. 
Matters  of  ceremony  and  title  at  the  iirft  feem  not  to 
be  (o ;  and  being  for  fome  time  negledted,  they  ac- 
quire fach  ftrength  as  not  to  be  eafily  removed.  From 
private  ufage  they  pafs  into  public  adts ;  and  thofe 
flatterers  who  gave  a  beginning  to  them,  propofing 
them  in  public  councils,  where  too  many  of  that 
ibrt  have  always  infinuated  themfelves,  gain  credit 
enough  to  make  them  pafs.  This  work  was  farther 
advanced  by  the  church  of  Rome,  according  to 
their  caftom  of  favouring  that  moft,  which  is  moft 
vaiii  and  corrupt  j  and  it  has  been  ufual   with  the 

U  4  popes 


%g6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill, 

popes  and  their  adherents,  hberally  to  gratify  princes 
for  fervices  render'd  to  the  church,  with  titles  that 
tended  only  to  the  prejudice  of  the  people.     Thefe 
poifonous  plants  having  taken  root,  grew  upfo  fail, 
that  the  titles  which,  within  the  fpace  of  a  hundred 
years,    were  thought  fufficient  for   the  kings  and 
queens  of  England,  have  of  late  been  given  to  Monk 
and  his  honourable  dutchefs.      New   phrafes  have 
been  invented  to  pleafe  princes,  or  the  fenfe  of  the 
old  perverted,  as  has  happen'd  to  that  of  ''  Le  Roy 
"  s'avifera:"  and  that  which  was  no  more  than  a  li- 
berty to  con  fult  with  the  lords  upon  a  bill  prefented  by 
the  connmons,  is  by  fome  men  now  taken  for  a  right 
inherent  in  the  king  of  denying  fuch  bills  as  may  be 
offered  to  him  by  the  lords  and  commons ;  tho'  the 
coronation  oath  oblige  him  to  hold,   keep  and   de- 
fend   the  juft    laws   and   cuftoms,    "  quas  valgus 
^^  elegerit."     And  if  a  flop  be  not  put  to  this  exor- 
bitant abufe,  the  words  ftill  remaining  in  a6ts  of 
parliament  which  fliew  that  their  ad:s  are  our  laws, 
may  perhaps  be  alfo  aboliflied. 

But  tho'  this  fhould  come  to  pafs,  by  the  fiacknefs 
of  the  lords  and  commons,  it  could  neither  create  a 
new  right  in  the  king,  nor  diminifh  tliat  of  the 
people  :  but  it  might  give  a  better  colour  to  thofe 
who  are  enemies  to  their  country,  to  render  the  power 
of  the  crown  arbitrary,  than  anv  thino-  that  is  yet 
among  us. 


SECT. 


Sea.  ^K.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      297 


SECT.     XXXV. 

^he  authority  given  by  our  law  to  the  aBs  performed 
by  a  king  de  fado,  detraB  nothing  from  the  peoples 
right  of  creati?2g  whom  they  pleafe, 

A  i  "N  HEY  who  have  more  regard  to  the  prevail- 
J^      ing  power  than  to  right,  and  lay  great  weight 
upon  the  ftatute  of  Henry  the  feventh,  which  au- 
thorizes the  ads    of  a  king  de  fado,  ktra  not  to 
confider,    that    thereby   they  deftroy   all  right   of 
inheritance  ;    that  he  only  is  King  de  fado,  who  is 
received  by  the  people;  and  that  this  reception  could 
neither  be  of  any  value  in  itfelf,  nor  be  made  valid 
by  a  ftatute,  unlefs  the  people  and  their  reprefenta- 
tives  who  make  the  flatute,  had  in  themfelves  the 
power  of  receiving,  authorizing  and  creating  whom 
they  pleafe.     For  he  is  not  King  de  fado  who  calls 
himfelf  fo,  as  Perkin  or  Simnel,  but  he  who  by  the 
confent  of  the  nation  is  poiTefs'd  of  the  regal  power. 
If  there  were  fuch  a  thing  in  nature,  as  a  natural 
lord  over  every  country,  and  that  the  right  muft  go 
by  defcent,  it  would  be  impoffible  for  any  other  man 
to  acquire  it,  or  for  the  people  to  confer  it  upon  him, 
and  to  give   the  authority  to  the  ads  of  one,  who 
neither  is  nor  can  be  a  king,  which  belongs  only  to 
him  who  has  the  right  inherent  in  himfelf,  and  infe- 
parable  from  him.     Neither  can  it  be  denied,  that 
the  fame  power  which  gives  the  validity  to  fuch  ads 
as  are  performed  by  one  who  is  not  a  king,  that  be- 
longs to  thofe  of  a  true  king,  may  alfo  make  him 
king;  for  the  effence  of  a  king  confifts  in  the  validity 
of  his  ads.     And  'tis  equally  abfurd  for  one  to  pre- 
tend to  be  a  king,  whole  ads  as  king  are  no^  valid, 
as  that  his  own  can  be  valid  if  thofe  of  another  are ; 
for  then  the  fame  indiviiible  right  which  our  author, 

and 


igS  DISCOURSES  Chap.  III. 

and  thofe  of  his  principles  aflert  to  be  infepar- 
able  from  the  perfon,  would  be  at  the  fame  time 
exercifed  and  enjoyed  by  two  diftind:  and  contrary 
powers. 

Moreover,  it  may  be  obfervcd,  that  this  ftatute 
was  made  after  frequent  and  bloody  wars  concerning 
titles  to  the  crown ;  and  whether  the  caufe  were  good 
or  bad,  thofe  who  were  overcome,  were  not  only 
fubjedl  to  be  killed  in  the  field,  but  afterwards  to  be 
profecuted    as    traitors  under   the    colour   of  law. 
He  v/ho  gained  the  vidory,  was  always  fet  up  to 
be  king  by  thofe  of  his  party  -,  and  he  never  failed  to 
proceed  againft  his  enemies  as  rebels.     This  intro- 
duced a  horrid  feries  of  the  moft  deftrudlive  mifchiefs. 
The  fortune  of  war  varied  often  ;  and  I  think  it  may 
be  faid,  that  there  were  few,  if  any,  great  families 
in  England,    that  were  not  either  deitroy'd,  or  at 
leaft  fo  far  fhaken,  as  to  lofe  their  chiefs,  and  ma- 
ny  confiderable  brandies  of  them :  and  experience 
taught,  that  inftead  of  gaining  any  advantage  to  the 
public  in  point  of  government,  he  for  wliom  they 
fought,  feidom  proved  better  than  his  enemy.    They 
faw  that  the  like  might  again  happen,  tho'  the  title  of 
the  reigning  king  ihould  be  as  clear  as   defcent  of 
blood  could  make  it.     This  brouo-ht  thines  into  an 
uneafy  pofture ;  and  'tis  not  llrange,    that  both  the 
nobility  and   commonalty  Ihould   be  weary  of  it. 
No  law  could  prevent  the  dangers  of  battle  ;  for  he 
that  had  followers,  and  would  venture  himfelf,  might 
bring  them  t  ^  fuch  a  deciiion,  as  v>;as  only  in  the 
hand  of  God.     But  thinking  no  more  could  juftiy  be 
required  to  the  full  performance  of  their  duty  to  the 
king,  than  to  expofe  themfclves  to  the  hazard  of 
battle  for  him  -,    and  not  being  anfwerable  for  the 
fuccefs,  they  would  not  have  that  law  which  they 
endeavour'd  to  fupport^  tu::ncd  to  their  delh'udion  by 

their 


Sefl.  25'    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      299 

their  enemies,  who  might  come  to  be  the  interpreters 
of  it.  But  as  they  could  be  exempted  from  this 
danger  only  by  their  own  laws  which  could  authorize 
,"  the  adts  of  a  king  without  a  title,  and  juftify  them 
.  foradting  under  him,  'tis  evident  that  the  power  of 
the  law  was  in  their  h'4nds,  and  that  the  ad:s  of  the 
perfon  who  enjoyed  the  crown  were  of  no  value  in 
themfelves.  The  law  had  been  impertinent,  if  it 
could  have  been  done  without  law ;  and  the  inter- 
vention of  the  parliament  ufelefs,  if  the  kings  de 
fa6lo  could  have  given  authority  to  their  own  acfls. 
But  if  the  parliament  could  make  that  to  have  the 
efrecl  of  law,  which  was  not  law,  and  exempt  thofe 
that  ad:ed  according  to  it  from  the  penalties  of  the 
law,  and  give  the  fame  force  to  the  ad:s  of  one  who 
is  not  king  as  of  one  who  is,  they  cannot  but  have  a 
power  of  making  him  to  be  king  who  is  not  fo  ; 
that  is  to  fay,  all  depends  intirely  upon  their  au- 
thority. 

Belides,  he  is  not  king  who  aiTumes  the  title  to 
himfelf,  or  is  fet  up  by  a  corrupt  party  5  but  he  who 
according  to  the  ufages  required  in  the  cafe  is  made 
king.  It  thefe  are  wanting,  he  is  neither  de  faclo 
nor  de  jure,  but  tyrannus  fine  titulo.  Neverthelefs, 
this  very  man,  if  he  comes  to  be  received  by  the 
people,  and  placed  in  the  throne,  he  is  thereby  mad 
king  de  fadto.  His  ads  are  valid  in  law  j  the  fame 
fcrvice  is  due  to  him  as  to  any  other :  they  who  ren- 
der it  are  in  the  fime  manner  protected  by  the  law 5 
that  is  to  fay,  he  is  truly  king.  If  our  author 
therefore  do  allow  fuch  to  be  kings,  he  muft  con- 
fefs  that  power  to  be  good  which  makes  them  fo, 
when  they  have  no  right  in  themfelves.  If  he  deny 
it,  he  muft  not  only  deny  that  there  is  any  fuch 
thing  as  a  king  de  fadlo,  which  the  ftatute  acknow- 
ledges. 


e 


300  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

ledges,  but  that  we  ever  had  any  king  in  England  • 
for  we  never  had  any  other  than  fuch,  as  I  have 
proved  before. 

By  the  fame  means  he  will  fo  unravel  all  the  lav/, 
that  no  man  lliall  know  what  he  has,  or  w^hat  he 
ought   to  do  or  avoid  ;  and  will  find  no  remedy  for 
this,  unlefs  he  allow,  that  laws  made  without  kings 
are  as  good  as  thole  made  with  them,  which  returns 
to  my  purpofe :    for  they  who  have  the  power  of 
making  laws,  may  by  law  make  a  king  as  well  as 
any  other  magiftrate.     And  indeed  the  intention  of 
this  ftatute  could  be  no  other  than  to  fecure  mens 
perfons  and  pofTeffions,  and  fo  far  to   declare  the 
power  of  giving  and  taking  away  the  crown  to  be  in 
the  parliament,  as  to  remove  all  difputes  concerning 
titles,  and  to  make  him  to  be  a  legal  king,    whom 
they  acknowledge  to  be  king. 

SECT.      XXXVI. 

T'/je  gefteral  revolt  cf  a  nation  cannot  be  called  a 

rebellion, 

AS  impoflors  feldom  make  lies  to  pafs  in  the 
world,    without  putting  falfe  names  upon 
things,  fuch  as  our  autlior  endeavour  to  perfuade  the 
people  they  ought  not  to  defend  their  liberties,  by 
giving  the  name  of  rebellion  to  the  moft  juft  and 
honourable  adions  that  have  been  performed  for  the 
prefervation  of  them  ;  and  to  aggravate  the  matter, 
fear  not  to  tell  us  that  rebellion  is  like  the  fin  of 
witchcraft.     But  thofe  who  feek  after  truth,  will 
eafiiy  find,  that  there  can  be  no  fuch  thing  in  the 
world  as  the  rebellion  of  a  nation  againft  its  own 
magiftrates,  and  that  rebellion   is  not  always   evil. 
That  this  may  appear,  it  will  not  be  amifs  to  confider 

the 


Sea  36.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    301 

the  word,  as  well  as  the  thing  underftood  by  it  as  it 
is  ufed  in  an  evil  fenfe. 

The  word  is  taken  from  the  latin  rebellare^  which 
fienifies  no  rraore  than  to  renew  a  war.     When  a 
town  or  province  had  been  fubdued  by  the  Romans, 
and  brought  under  their  dominion,  if  they  violated 
their  faith  after  the  fettlement  of  peace,  and  invaded 
their  mailers  who  had  fpared  them,  they  were  faid 
to  rebel.     But  it  had  been  more  abfurd  to  apply  that 
word  to  the  people  that  rofe  up  againft  the  decem- 
viri, kings  or  other  magiftrates,  than  to  the  Parthians 
or  any  of  thofe  nations  who  had  no  dependance  up- 
on them ;  for  all  the  circumftances  that  fliould  make 
a  rebellion   were  wanting,    the  word  implying  a 
fuperiority  in  them  againft  whom  it  is,  as  well  as  the 
breach  of  an  eftablifh'd  peace.    But  tho'  every  private 
man  lingly  taken  be  fubjed:  to  the  commands  of  the 
magiftrate,  the  whole  body  of  the  people  is  not  fo  ; 
for  he  is  by  and  for  the  people,  and  the  people  is 
neither  by  nor  for  him.     The  obedience  due  to  him 
from  private  men  is  grounded  upon,  and  meafured 
by  the  general  law ;    and  that  law  regarding  the 
welfare  of  the  people,  cannot  fet  up  the  intereft  of 
one  or  a  few  men  againft  the  public.     The  whole 
body  therefore  of  a  nation  cannot  be  tied  to  any  other 
obedience  than  this  confiftent  with  the  common  good, 
according  to  their  own  judgment :  and  having  never 
been  fubdued  or  brought  to  terms  of  peace  with  their 
magiftrates,  they  cannot  be  faid  to  revolt  or  rebel 
againft  them,  to  whom  they  owe  no   more  than 
feems  good  to  themfclves,  and  who  are  nothing  of 
or  by  themfelves,  more  than  other  men. 

Again,  the  thing iignified  by  rebeUionis  not  always 
evil ;  fortho'  every  fubdued  nation  muft  acknowledge 
a  fuperiority  in  thofe  who  have  fubdued  them,  and 
jrebellion  do  imply  a  breach  of  the  peace,  yet  that 

fuperiority 


302  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

fuperiority  is  not  infinite  ;  the  peace  may  be  broken 
upon  juft  grounds,  and  it  may  be  neither  a  crime  nor 
infamy  to  do  it.  Tlie  Privernates  had  been  more 
than  once  fabdued  by  the  Romans'^,  and  had  as  often 
rebelled.  Their  city  was  at  laft  taken  by  Plautius 
the  conful,  after  their  leader  Vitruvius  and  great 
numbers  of  their  fenate  and  people  had  been  kiiPd  : 
being  reduced  to  alow  condition,  they  fen t  ambaf- 
fadors  to  Rome  to  defire  peace  ^  where  when  a  fe- 
nator  allced  them  what  punifhment  they  deferved, 
one  of  them  anfwered,  ''  The  fame  which  they 
"  deferve  who  think  themfelves  worthy  of  liberty/' 
The  conful  then  demanded,  ''  what  kind  of  peace 
"  might  be  expeded  from  them,  if  the  punifliment 
"  fliould  be  remitted  :"  The  ambaffador  anfwer'd, 
"  "f  If  the  terms  you  give  be  good,  the  peace  will 
"  be  obferved  by  us  faithfully  and  perpetually  ;  if 
"  bad,  it  will  foon  be  broken."  And  tho'  fome 
were  offended  with  the  ferocity  of  the  anfwer  -,  yet 
the  beft  part  of  the  fenate  approved  it  as  "  J  worthy 
*'  of  a  man  and  a  freeman;"  and  confeffing  that  no 
man  or  nation  would  continue  under  an  uneafy  con- 
dition longer  than  they  were  compell'd  by  force, 
faid,  "  jl  they  only  were  fit  to  be  made  Romans, 
*'  who  thought  nothing  valuable  but  liberty."  Up- 
on which  they  were  all  made  citizens  of  Rome,  and  i 
obtained  whatfoever  they  had  deiTred. 

I  know  not  how  this  matter  can  be  carried  to  a 
greater  height ,  for  if  it  were  poffible,  that  a  people 
refifting  oppreffion,  and  vindicating  their  own  liber- 
ty, could  commit  a  crime,  and  incur  either  guilt 
or  infamy,  the  Privernates  did,  who  had  been  often 

*  T.  Liv.  1.  S.      ^ 

•f  Si  bonam  dederitis,  fidam  &  perpetuam  ;  fi  malam,  haud  diutur- 
nam.     Liv. 

X  Viri  &  liberi  vocem  audltam.     UiJ. 

II  Eos  demum,  qui  nihil  praiterquam  de  libertate  cogitant,  dignos 
effe,  qui  Romani  fiant.       UU. 

fub- 


Sea.  36.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     303 

fubdued,  and  often  pardoned  ;  but  even  in  the  judg- 
ment of  their  conquerors  whom  they  had  offended, 
the  refolution  they  profelTed  of  rtanding  to  no  agree- 
ment impofed  upon  them  by  neceffity,  was  account- 
ed the  higheft  teftimony  of  fuch  a  virtue  as  rendred 
them  worthy  to  be  admitted  into  a  fociety  and  equa- 
lity with  themfelves,  who  were  the  moll  brave  and 
virtuous  people  of  the  world. 

But  if  the  patience  of  a  conquered  people  may  have 
limits,  and  they  who  will  not  bear  oppreffion  from 
thofe  who  had  fpared  their  lives,  may  deferve  praife 
and  reward  from  their  conquerors,  it  would  be 
madnefs  to  think,  that  any  nation  can  be  obliged  to 
bear  whatfoever  their  own  magiftrates  think  fit  to 
do  againft  them.  This  may  feem  ftrange  to  thofe 
who  talk  fo  much  of  conquefts  made  by  kings ; 
immunities,  liberties  and  privileges  granted  to  nati- 
ons ',  oaths  of  allegiance  taken,  and  wonderful  bene- 
fits conferred  upon  them.  But  having  already  faid 
as  much  as  is  needful  concerning  conquefts,  and 
that  the  miagiflrate  who  has  nothing  except  what 
is  given  to  him,  can  only  difpenfe  out  of  the  pub- 
lick  flock  fuch  franchifes  and  privileges  as  he  has 
received  for  the  reward  of  fervices  done  to  the  coun- 
try, and  encouragement  of  virtue,  I  ihall  at  prefent 
keep  my  felf  to  the  two  laft  points. 

Allegiance  fignifies  no  more  (as  the  words  ^^ 
legem  declare)  than  fuch  an  obedience  as  the  law 
requires.  But  as  the  law  can  require  nothing  from 
the  whole  people,  who  are  mafters  of  it,  allegiance 
can  only  relate  to  particulars,  and  not  to  the  whole. 
No  oath  can  bind  any  other  than  thofe  who  take  it, 
and  that  only  in  the  true  fenfe  and  meaning  of  it : 
but  fingle  men  only  take  this  oath,  and  therefore 
fingle  men  are  only  obliged  to  keep  it  :  the  body  of 
a  people  neither  does,  nor  can  perform  any  fuch  adl : 


agreements 


304  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

agreements  and  contracSs  have  been  made  ;  as  the 
tribe  of  Judah,  and  the  reft  of  Ifrael  afterward,  made 
a  covenant  with  David,  upon  which  they  made  him 
king;  but  no  wife  man  can  think,  that  the  nation 
did  thereby  make  themfelves  the  creature  of  their 
own  creature. 

The  fenfe  alfo  of  an  oath  ought  to  be  confidered. 
No  man  can  by  an  oath  be  obliged  to  any  thing  be- 
yond, or  contrary  to  the  true  meaning  of  it :  private 
men  who  fwear  obedience  ad  legem,  fwear  no  obe- 
dience extra  or  contra  legem  :  whatfoever  they 
promife  or  fwear,  can  detradt  nothing  from  the  pub- 
lic liberty,  which  the  law  principally  intends  to 
preferve.  Tho'  many  of  them  may  be  obliged  in 
their  feveral  ftations  and  capacities  to  render  peculiar 
fervices  to  a  prince,  the  people  continue  as  free  as 
the  internal  thoughts  of  a  man,  and  cannot  but  have 
a  right  to  preferve  their  liberty,  or  avenge  the  vio- 
lation. 

If  matters  are  well  examined,  perhaps  not  many 
magiftrates  can  pretend  to  much  upon  the  title  of 
merit,  moft  efpecially  if  they  or  their  progenitors 
have  continued  long  in  office.  The  conveniences 
annexed  to  the  exercife  of  the  fovereign  power,  may 
be  thought  fufficient  to  pay  fuch  fcores  as  they  grow 
due,  even  to  the  beft  :  and  as  things  of  that  nature 
are  handled,  I  think  it  will  hardly  be  found,  that  all 
princes  can  pretend  to  an  irreiiftible  power  upon  the 
account  of  beneficence  to  their  people.  When  the 
family  ofMedices  came  to  be  mailers  of  Tufcany, 
that  country  was  without  difpute,  in  men,  money 
and  arms,  one  of  the  moft  flourifliing  provinces  in 
the  world,  as  appears  by  Machiavel's  account,  and 
the  relation  of  what  happened  between  Charles  the 
eighth  and  the  magiftrates  of  Florence,  which  I 
have  mentioned  already  from  Guicciardin.     Now 

who- 


Sea.  36.    CONCERiSFING  GOVERNMENT.      305 

whoever  fhall  confider  the  ftrength  of  that  country 
in  thofe  days,  together  with  w^hat  it  might  have 
been  in  the  fpace  of  a  hundred  and  forty  years,  in 
which  they  have  had  no  war,  nor  any  other  plague, 
than  the  extortion,  fraud,  rapine  and  cruelty  of 
their  princes,  and  compare  it  with  their  prefent  de- 
folate,  wretched  and  contemptible  condition,  rnay, 
if  he  pleafe,  think  that  much  veneration  is  due  to 
the  princes  that  govern  them,  but  will  never  make 
any  man  believe  that  their  title  can  be  grounded  upon 
beneficence.  The  like  may  be  faid  of  the  duke  of 
Savoy,  who  pretending  (upon  I  know  not  what 
account)  that  every  peafant  in  the  Dutchy  ought  to 
pay  him  two  crowns  every  half  year,  did  in  1662 
fubtilly  find  out,  that  in  every  year  there  were  thir- 
teen halves  ;  ib  that  a  poor  man  who  had  nothing 
but  what  he  gained  by  hard  labour,  was  through 
his  fatherly  care  and  beneficence,  forced  to  pay  fix 
and  twenty  crowns  to  his  royal  highnefs,  to  be  em- 
ployed in  his  difcreet  and  virtuous  pleafures  at  Turin. 
The  condition  of  the  feventeen  provinces  of  the 
Netherlands  (and  even  of  Spain  it  felf)  when  they 
fell  to  the  houfe  of  Aufl:ria,  was  of  the  fame  nature  : 
and  I  will  confefs  as  much  as  can  be  required,  if 
any  other  marks  of  their  government  do  remain, 
than  fuch  as  are  manifeft  evidences  of  their  pride, 
avarice,  luxury  and  cruelty. 

France  in  outward  appearance  makes  a  better 
fhow ;  but  nothing  in  this  world  is  more  miferable, 
than  that  people  under  the  fatherly  care  of  their  tri- 
umphant monarch.  The  beft  of  their  condition  is 
like  aflis  and  mafl:iff-dogs,  to  work  and  fight,  to 
be  opprefl^ed  and  kill'd  for  him ;  and  thofe  among 
them  who  have  any  underftanding  well  know,  that 
their  induftry,  courage,  and  good  fuccefs,  is  not 
only  unprofitable,  but  defirudlive  to  them ;  and  that 
Vol.  II.  X  by 


^,o5  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IH. 

by  increafing  the  power  of  their  mafter,  they  add 
weight  to  their  own  chains.  And  if  any  prince,  gr 
fucceffion  of  princes,  have  made  a  more  modeft  ufe 
of  their  power,  or  more  faithfully  difeharged  the 
truft  repofed  in  them,  it  muft  be  imputed  peculiar- 
ly to  them,  as  a  teftimony  of  their  perfonal  virtue, 
and  can  have  no  eifed:  upon  others. 

The  rights  therefore  of  kings  are  not  grounded 
upon  conqueft  >  the  liberties  of  nations  do  not  arife 
from  the  grants  of  their  princes  ;  the  oath  of  alle- 
giance binds  no  private  man  to  more  than  the  law 
direds,  and  has  no  influence  upon  the  whole  body 
of  every  nation :  many  princes  are  known  to  their 
fubjefts  only  by  the  injuries,  loffes  and  mifchiefs 
brought  upon  them  -,  fuch  as  are  good  and  juft, 
ought  to  be  rewarded  for  their  perfonal  virtue,  but 
can  confer  no  right  upon  thofe  who  no  way  refemble 
them  ;  and  whoever  pretends  to  that  merit,  muft 
prove  it  by  his  adtions  :  rebellion  being  nothing  but 
a  renewed  war,  can  never  be  againft  a  government 
that  was  not  eftablilhed  by  war,  and  of  it  felf  isnei- 
ther  good  nor  evil,  more  than  any  other  war  ;  but 
is  jufl  or  unjuil  according  to  the  caufe  or  manner  of 
it,  Beiides,  that  rebellion  which  by  Samuel  *  is 
compared  to  witchcraft,  is  not  of  private  men,  era 
people  againft  the  prince,  but  of  the  prince  againft 
God  :  The  Ifraelites  are  often  faid  to  have  rebelled 
againft  the  law,  word,  or  command  of  God  5  but 
tho'  they  frequently  oppofed  their  kings,  I  do  not 
find  rebellion  imputed  to  them  on  that  account,  nor 
any  ill  character  put  upon  fuch  adlions.  We  are 
told  alfoof  fome  kings  who  had  been  fubdued,  and 
afterwards  rebelled  againft  Chedorlaomer  and  other 
kings ',  but  their  caufe  is  not  blamed,  and  we  have 
fome  reafon  to  believe  it  good,  becaufe    Abraham 

*  I  Sam-  .\v.  23. 

4  took 


Sea.  36.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      307 

took  part  with  thofe  who  had  rebelled.  However 
it  can  be  of  no  prejudice  to  the  caufe  I  defend  ;  for 
the'  it  were  true,  that  thofe  fubdued  kings  could  not 
juftly  rife  againft  the  perfon  who  had  fubdued  them  ; 
or  that  generally  no  king  being  once  vanquifhed, 
could  have  a  right  of  rebellion  againft  his  conqueror, 
it  could  have  no  relation  to  the  actions  of  a  people 
vindicating  their  own  laws  and  liberties  againft  a 
prince  who  violates  them  5  for  that  war  which  ne- 
ver was,  can  never  be  renewed.  And  if  it  be  true 
in  any  cafe,  that  hands  and  fwords  are  given  to  men, 
that  they  only  may  be  ilaves  who  have  no  courage, 
it  muft  be  when  liberty  is  overthrown  by  thofe,  who 
of  all  men  ought  with  the  utmoft  induftry  and  vi- 
gour to  have  defended  it.    - 

That  this  fhould  be  known,  is  not  only  neceiTary 
for  the  fafety  of  nations,  but  advantageous  to  fuch 
kings  as  are  wife  and  good.  They  who  know  the 
frail  y  of  human  nature,  will  always  diftruft  their 
own  ;  and  defiring  only  to  do  what  they  ought, 
will  be  glad  to  be  reftrain'd  from  that  which  they 
ought  not  to  do.  Being  taught  by  reafon  and  ex- 
perience, that  nations  delight  in  the  peace  and  juftice 
of  a  good  government,  they  w^ill  never  fear  a  gene- 
ral infurred:ion,  whilft  they  take  care  it  be  rightly 
adminiftred  3  and  finding  themfelves  by  this  means 
to  be  fafe,  will  never  be  unwilling,  that  their  chil- 
dren or  fucceflbrs  ftiould  be  obliged  to  tread  in  the 
fame  fteps. 

If  it  be  fald  that  this  may  fometimes  caufe  dif- 
orders,  I  acknowledge  it ;  but  no  human  condition 
being  perfed:,  fuch  a  one  is  to  be  chofen,  which 
carries  with  it  the  moft  tolerable  inconveniencies  : 
and  it  being  much  better  that  the  irregularities  and 
exceffes  of  a  prince  fhould  be  reftrained  or  fuppreffed, 
than  that  whole  nations  fhould  perifh  by  them,  thofe 

X  2    '  conftitu- 


308  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

conftltutions  that  make  the  beft  provifion  againft  the 
greateft  evils,  are  moft  to  be  commended.  If  go- 
vernments were  inftituted  to  gratify  the  luftsofone 
man,  thofe  could  not  be  good  that  fet  Hmits  to  them; 
but  all  reafonable  men  confeffing  that  they  are  infti- 
tuted for  the  good  of  nations,  they  only  can  deferve 
praife,  who  above  all  things  endeavour  to  procure  it, 
and  appoint  means  proportioned  to  that  end.  The 
great  variety  of  governments  vv^hich  we  fee  in  the 
world,  is  nothing  but  the  effe<5l  of  this  care  3  and 
all  nations  have  been,  and  are  more  or  lefs  happy, 
as  they  or  their  anceftors  have  had  vigour  of  fpirit, 
integrity  of  manners,  aod  wifdom  to  invent  and 
eftablifh  fuch  orders,  as  have  better  or  worfe  pro- 
vided for  this  common  good,  which  was  fought  by 
all.  But  as  no  rule  can  be  fo  exadt,  to  make  pro- 
vifion againft  all  conteftations ;  and  all  difputes  about 
right  do  naturally  end  in  force  whenjuftice  is  denied 
(ill  men  never  wiUingly  fubmitting  to  any  decifion 
that  is  contrary  to  their  paflions  and  interefts)  the 
beft  conftitutions  are  of  no  value,  if  there  be  not  a 
power  tofupport  them.  This  power  firft  exerts  it 
felf  in  the  execution  of  juftice  by  the  ordinary  offi- 
cers :  but  no  nation  having  been  fo  happy,  as  not 
fometimes  to  produce  fuch  princes  as  Edward  and 
Richard  the  feconds,  and  fuch  minifters  as  Gavef- 
ton,  Spencer,  and  Trefilian,  the  ordinary  officers  of 
iuftice  often  v/ant  the  will,  and  always  the  power 
to  reftrain  them.  So  that  the  rights  and  liberties  of 
a  nation  muft  be  utterly  fubverted  and  aboliftied,  if 
the  power  of  the  whole  may  not  be  employed  to 
aflert  them,  or  punifli  the  violation  of  them.  But 
as  it  is  the  fundamental  right  of  every  nation  to  be 
governed  by  fuch  laws,  in  fuch  manner,  and  by 
luchperfonsas  they  think  moft  conducing  to  their 

own 


Sea,  37.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     309 

own  good,  they  cannot  be  accountable  to  any  but 
themfelves  for  what  they  do  in  that  moft  important 
aiFair. 

SECT.      XXXVII. 

The  Englijlj  government  was  not  ill  conjlituted^ 
the  defe5ls  more  lately  obferved  proceeding  from 
the  change  of  manners^  and  corruption  of  the 
times, 

I  AM  not  Ignorant  that  many  honeft  and  good 
men  acknowledging  thefe  rights,  and  the  care  of 
our  anceftors  to  preferve  them,  think  they  wanted 
wifdom  rightly  to  proportionate  the  means  to  the 
end.  'Tis  not  enough,  fay  they,  for  the  general  of 
an  army  to  defire  victory  ;  he  only  can  deferve  praife, 
who  has  {kill,  induftry,  and  courage  to  take  the 
beft  meafures  of  obtaining  it.  Neither  is  it  enough 
for  wife  legiflators  to  preferve  liberty,  and  to  eredt 
fuch  a  government  as  may  ftand  for  a  time  5  but  to 
fet  fuch  clear  rules  to  thofe  who  are  to  put  it  in 
execution,  that  every  man  may  know  when  they 
tranfgrefs ;  and  appoint  fuch  means  for  retraining 
or  punifhing  them,  as  may  be  ufed  fpeedily,  furely, 
and  eifedlually,  without  danger  to  the  public.  Sparta 
being  thus  conftituted,  we  hardly  find  that,  for  more 
than  eight  hundred  years,  any  king  prefumed  to  pafs 
the  limits  prefcribed  by  the  law.  If  any  Roman 
conful  grew  infolent,  he  might  be  reduced  to  order 
without  blood,  or  danger  to  the  public ;  and  no 
dictator  ever  ufurped  a  power  over  liberty  till  the 
time  of  Sylla,  when  all  things  in  the  city  were  fo 
changed,  that  the  antient  foundations  were  become 
too  narrow.  In  Venice  the  power  of  the  duke  is  fo 
circumfcribed,  that  in  one  thoufand  three  hundred 
years,  no  one,  except  Falerio  and  Tiepoli,  have  dared 

X  3  to 


3IO  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

to  attempt  any  thing  againftthe  laws:  and  they  were 
immediately  fuppreffed  with  litttle  commotion  in  the 
city.     On  the  other  fide,   our  law  is  fo  ambiguous, 
perplext  and  intricate,  that  'tis  hard  to  know  when 
'tis  broken.     In  all  the  public  contefts  we  have  had, 
men  of  good  judgment  and  integrity  have  followed 
both  parties,     The  means  of  tranfgreffing  and  pro-. 
curing  partizans  to  make  good  by  force  the  moft 
notorious  violations  of  liberty,    have  been  fo  eafy, 
that  no  prince  who  has  endeavoured  it,  ever  failed 
to  get  great  numbers  of  followers,  and  to  do  infinite 
mifchiefs  before  he  could  be  removed.     The  nation 
has  been  brought  to  fight  againft  thofe  they  had  made 
to  be  what  they  were,  upon  the  unequal  terms  of 
hazarding  all  againft  nothing.     If  they  had  fuccefs, 
they  gained  no  more  than  was  there  own  before, 
and  which  the  law  ought  to  have  fecured  :  whereas 
'tis  evident,  that  if  at  any  one  time  the  contrary  had 
happened,  the  nation  had  been  utterly  enflaved^  and 
no  vidlory  was  ever  gained  without  the  lofs  of  much 
noble  and  innocent  blood. 

To  this  I  anfwer,  that  no  right  judgment  can  be 
given  of  human  things,  without  a  particular  regard 
to  the  tim.e  in  v^^hich  they  pafTed.  We  efteem  Scipio, 
Hannibal  J  Pyrrhus,  Alexander,  Epaminondas  and 
Caefar,  to  have  been  admirable  commanders  in  war, ' 
becaufe  they  had  in  a  moft  eminent  degree  all  the 
qualities  that  could  make  them  fo,  and  knev/  beft 
how  to  em.  ploy  the  arms  then  in  ufe  according  to 
the  difcipline  of  their  times;  and  yet  no  man  doubts, 
that  if  the  moft  fkilful  of  them  could  be  raifed  from 
the  grave,  reftored  to  the  utmoft  vigour  of  mind  and 
body,  fet  at  the  head  of  the  beft  armies  he  ever  com- 
manded, and  placed  upon  the  frontiers  of  France  or 
Flanders,  he  would  not  know  how  to  advance  or 
retreat,    nor  by   v/hat  m.eans  to  take  any  of  the 

places 


Sea.  21'   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      311 

Places  in  thofe  parts,  as  they  are  now  fortified  and 
defended  -,  but  would  moft  certainly  be  beaten   by 
any  infignificant  fellow  with  a  fmall  number  of  men, 
furniflied  with  fuch  arms  as  are  now  in   ufe,  and 
following  the  methods   now   pradbifed.     Nay,  the 
manner  of  m^trching,  encamping,  befieging,  attack- 
ing, defending  and  fighting,  isfo  much  altered  within 
the  lall  threefcore  years,  that  no  man  obferving  the 
difcipline  that  was  then  thought  to  be  the  befl:,  could 
poflibly  defend  himfelf  againft  that  which  has  been 
fince  found  out,  tho'  the  terms  are  flill  the  fame. 
And  if  it  be  confider'd  that  political  matters  are  fub- 
je6t  to  the  fame  mutations  (as  certainly  they  are)  it 
will  be  futficient  to  excufe  our  anceftors,  who  fuiting 
their  government  to  the  ages  in  which  they  lived, 
could  neither  forefee  the  changes  that  might  happen 
in  future  generations,  nor  appoint  remedies  for  the 
mifchicfs  they  did  not  forefee. 

They  knew  that  the  kings  of  feveral  nations  had 
been  kept  within  the  limits  of  the  law,  by  the  virtue 
and  power  of  a  great  and  brave  nobility;  and  that  no 
other  way  of  fupporting  a  mix'd  monarchy  had  ever 
been  known  in  the  world,  than  by  putting  the 
balance  into  the  hands  of  thofe  who  had  the  greateft 
interefl:  in  nations,  and  who  by  birth  and  eftate 
enjoy'd  greater  advantages  than  kings  could  confer 
upon  them  for  rewards  of  betraying  their  country.  . 
They  knew  that  when  the  nobility  was  fo  great  as 
not  eafily  to  be  number'd,  the  little  that  was  left  to 
the  king  s  difpofal,  was  not  fufficient  to  corrupt  many^ 
and  if  fome  mJght  fall  under  the  tem.ptation,  thofe 
who  continuea  in  their  integrity^  would  eafily  be 
able  to  chaftife  them  for  deferting  the  public  caufe, 
and  by  that  means  deter  kings  from  endeavouring  to 
feduce  them  from  their  duty,  Whilft  things  conti- 
nued in  this  pofture,  kings  might  fafely  be  truded 

X  4  (with 


512  DISCOURSES        Chap.  HI. 

(with  the  advice  of  their  council)   to  confer  the 
commands  of  the  militia  in  towns  and  provinces  upon 
the  moft  eminent  men  in  them:  and  whilft  thofe  kings 
were  exercifed  in  almoft  perpetual  wars,  and  placed 
their  glory  inthegreatnefsof  the  aftions  theyatchieved 
by  the  power  and  valour  of  their  people,  it  was  their 
interelT:  always  to  choofe  fuch  as  feemed  beft  to  de- 
ferve  that  honour.     It  was  not  to  be  imagined  that 
through  the  weaknefs  of  fome,  and  malice  of  others, 
thofe  dignities  fhould  by  degrees  be  turned  into  empty 
titles,  and  become  the  rewards  of  the  greateft  crimes, 
and  the  vileft  fervices  -,  or  that  the  nobleft  of  their 
defcendants  for  want  of  them,  fhould  be  brought 
under  the  name  of  commoners,  and  deprived  of  all 
privileges  except  fuch  as  were  common  to  them 
with  their  grooms.     Such  a  ftupendous  change  being 
in  procefs  of  time  infenfibly  introduced,  the  founda- 
tions of  that  government  which  they  had  eftablifhed, 
were  removed,  and   the  fuperftrudure  overthrown. 
The  balance  by  which  it  fubfifted  was  broken ;  and 
'tis  as  impoffible  to  reftore  it,  as  for  moft  of  thofe 
w^ho  at  this  day  go  under  the  name  of  noblemen, 
to   perform  the  duties  required  fi'om   the   antient 
nobility  of  England.     And  tho'  there  were  a  charm 
in  the  name,    and  thofe  who  have  it,    il^ould  be 
immediately  filled  with  a  fpirit  like  to  that  which 
animated  our  anceftors,  and  endeavour  to  deferve 
the  honours  they  poffefs,    by  fuch  fervices  to  the 
country    as  they  ought  to   have    performed   before 
they  had  them,  they  would  not  be  able  to  accomplifli 
it.     They  have  neither  the  intereft  nor  the  eftates 
required  for  fo  great  a  work.     Thofe  w^ho   have 
eftates  at  a  rack  rent,  have  no  dependants.     Their 
tenants,  when  they  have  paid  what  is  agreed,  owe 
them  nothing;  and  knowing  they  lliall  be  turned  out 
of  their  tenements,  as  foon  as  any  other  will  give 

a, 


Sea.  37-  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     313 

a  little  more,  they  look  upon  their  lords  as  men  who 
receive  more  from  them  than  they  confer  upon  them. 
This  dependance  being  loft,  the  lords  have  only 
more  money  to  fpend  or  lay  up  than  others,  but  no 
command  of  men ;  and  can  therefore  neither  pro- 
ted:  the  weak,  nor  curb  the  infolent.  By  this  means 
all  things  have  been  brought  into  the  hands  of  the 
king  and  the  commoners,  and  there  is  nothing  left  to 
cement  them,  and  to  maintain  the  union.  The 
perpetual  jarrings  we  hear  every  day ;  the  divifion  of 
the  nation  into  fuch  faftions  as  threaten  us  with 
ruin,  and  all  the  diforders  that  we  fee  or  fear,  are  the 
effefe  of  this  rupture.  Thefe  things  are  not  to  be 
imputed  to  our  original  conftitutions,  but  to  thofe 
v/ho  have  fubverted  them :  and  if  they  who  by 
corrupting,  changing,  enervating  and  annihilating 
the  nobility,  which  was  the  principal  fupport  of  the 
antient  regular  monarchy,  have  driven  thofe  who 
are  truly  noblemen  into  the  fame  intereft  and  name- 
with  the  commons,  and  by  that  means  increafed  a 
party  which  never  was,  and  I  think  never  can  be 
united  to  the  court,  they  are  to  anfwer  for  the  con- 
fequences  j  and  if  they  perifli,  their  deftrudlion  is 
from  themfelves. 

The  inconveniencies  therefore  proceed  not  from 
the  inftitution,  but  from  the  innovation.  The 
law  was  plain,  but  it  has  been  induftrioufly  rendred 
perplex  :  they  who  were  to  have  upheld  it  are  over- 
thrown. That  v/hich  might  have  been  eafily  per- 
formed when  the  people  was  armed,  and  had  a  great, 
ftrong.  virtuous  and  pov/erful  nobility  to  lead  them, 
is  made  difficult,  now  they  are  difarmed,  and  that 
nobility  abolifhed.  Our  anceftors  may  evidently 
appes-r,  not  only  to  have  intended  v/ell,  but  to  have 
taken  a  right  courfe  to  accomplifli  what  they 
intended.  This  had  efteit  as  long  as  the  caufe  con- 
tinued ; 


3X4  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

tinued ;  and  the  only  fault  that  can  be  afcribed  to 
that  which  they  eftabliihed  is,  that  it  has  not  proved 
to  be  perpetual ;  which  is  no  more  than  may  be 
juftly  faid  of  the  beft  human  conftitutions  that  ever 
have  been  in  the  world.  If  we  will  be  juft  to  our 
anceftors,  it  will  become  us  in  our  time  rather  to 
purfue  what  we  know  they  intended,  and  by  new 
conftitutions  to  repair  the  breaches  made  upon  the 
old,  than  to  accufe  them  of  the  defects  that  will  for 
ever  attend  the  adions  of  men.  Taking  our  affairs 
at  the  worft,  we  fliall  foon  find,  that  if  we  have 
the  fame  fpirit  they  had,  we  may  eafily  reftore  our 
nation  to  its  antient  liberty,  dignity  and  happinefs ; 
and  if  we  do  not,  the  fault  is  owing  to  our- 
felves,  and  not  to  any  want  of  virtue  and  wifdom 
in  them. 

SECT.      XXXVIII. 

^be  power  of  calling  and  dijfolving  parliaments  h  not 

Jimply  in   the  king.     The  variety  of  cujloni^  in 

choojing  parliament  men^  and  the  errors  a  people 

may  commit ^  neither  prove  that  kings  are  or  ought 

to  be  ahfolute, 

TH  E  original  of  magiftratical  power,  the 
intention  of  our  anceftors  in  its  creation,  and 
the  ways  prefcribed  forthe  diredion  and  limitation  of 
it  may,  I  prefume,  fufRcIently  appear  by  what  has 
been  faid.  But  becaufe  our  author,  taking  hold  of 
every  twig,  pretends  *'  that  kings  may  call  and 
*'  diifolve  parliaments  at  their  pleafure,"  and  from 
thence  infers  *'  the  power  to  be  wholly  in  themj" 
alledges  "  the  various  cuftoms  in  feveral  parts  of  this 
^'  nation  ufed  in  the  eledions  of  parliament  men,  to 
"  proceed  from  the  king's  will}"  and  ''  becaufe  a 

y  people 


■  Se6l.  3S.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     315 

''  people  may  commit  errors/*  thinks  "  all   power 
<'  ought  to  be  put  into  the  hands  of  the  king  \* 

I  anfwer,     i.    That  the   power  of  calling  and 
diffolving  parliaments  is  not  fimply  in  kings.     They 
may  call  parliaments,  if  there  be  occafion,  at  times 
when  the  law  does  not  exadl  it ;  they  are  placed  as 
j  fentinels,  and  ought  vigilantly  to  obferve  the  motions 
'  of  the  enemy,  and  give  .notice  of  his  approach  :  but 
if  the  fentinel  fall  afleep,  negledl  his  duty,  or  ma- 
licioufly  endeavour  to  betray  the  city,  thofe  who  are 
concern'd  may  make  ufe  of  all  other  means  to  know 
their  danger,  and  to  preferve  themfelves.     The  ig- 
norance, incapacity,  negligence  or  luxury  of  a  king, 
is  a  great  calamity  to  a  nation,  and  his  malice  is  worfe, 
but  not  an  irreparable  ruin.     Remedies  may  be,  and 
often  have  been  found  againft  the  worft  of  their  vices. 
The  lafl  French  kings  of  the  races  of  Meroveus  and 
Pepin  brought  many  mifchiefs  upon  the  kingdom, 
but  the  deflrucftlon  was  prevented.     Edward  and 
Richard  the  feconds   of  England  were   not  unlike 
them,  and  v/e  know  by  what  means  the  nation  was 
prefer ved.     The  queftion  was  not  who  had  the  right, 
or  who  ought  to  call  parliaments,  but  how  the  com- 
monwealth might  be  faved  from  ruin.     The  confuls, 
or  other  chief  magiftrates  in  Rome,  had  certainly  a 
right  of  aflembling  and  difmifling  the  fenate :  but 
when   Hannibal  was  at  the  gates,  or   any  other 
imminent  danger  threatned  them  with  deftruftion ; 
if  that  niagiflrate  had  been  drunk,  mad,  or  gained 
by  the  enemy,  no  wi^e  man  can  think  that  formalities 
were  to  have  been  obferved.   In  fuch  cafes  every  man 
is  a  m-agiilrate  3  and  he  who  bell  knows  the  danger, 
and  the  means  of  preventing  it,  has  a  right  of  calling 
the  fenate  or  people  to  an  alTembly.      The  people 
would,  and  certainly  ought  to  follow  him,  as  they 
did  Brutus  and  Valerius  againft  Tarquin,  or  Horatius 

and 


5i6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  Ill; 

and  Valerius  agalnft  the  Decemviri ;  and  whoever 
iliould  do  otherv^ife,  might  for  fottiflmefs  be  com- 
pared to  the  courtiers  of  the  two  lafl:  kings  of  Spain.  • 
1  he  firft  of  thefe,  by  name  Phihp  the  third,  being 
indifpofed  in  cold  v^eather,  a  Braziero  of  coals  was 
brought  into  his  chamber,  and  placed  fo  near  him 
that  he  was  cruelly  fcorched.  A  nobleman  then 
prefent  faid  to  one  who  ftood  by  him,  '^  the  king 
"  burns ;"  the  other  anfwered  it  was  true,  but  the 
page,  whofe  office  it  was  to  bring  and  remove  the 
Braziero,  was  not  there ;  and  before  he  could  be 
found  his  majefly^s  legs  and  face  were  fo  burnt, 
that  it  caus'd  an  Eryfipelas,  of  which  he  died. 
Philip  the  fourth  efcap'd  not  much  better,  who 
being  furprized  as  he  was  hunting  by  a  violent  ftorm 
of  rain  and  hail,  <  nd  no  man  prefuming  to  lend  the 
king  a  cloa  ■,  he  was  fo  wet  before  the  officer  could 
be  found  who  carried  his  ov/n,  that  he  took  a 
cold,  which  caft  him  into  a  dangerous  fever.  If 
kings  like  the  confequences  of  fuch  a  regularity, 
they  may  caufe  it  to  be  obferved  in  their  own 
families ;  but  nations  looking  in  the  firfl  place  to 
their  own  fafety,  would  be  guilty  of  the  moft 
extreme  flupidity,  if  they  fhould  fuffer  them- 
felves  to  be  ruined  for  adhering  to  fuch  cere- 
monies. 

This  is  faid  upon  a  fuppofition,  that  the  whole 
power  of  calling  and  diilolving  paaliaments,  is  by 
tihe  law  placed  in  the  king  :  but  I  utterly  deny 
that  it  is  fo;  and  to  prove  it,  Aall  give  the  following 
reafons. 

(i.)  That  the  king  can  have  no  fuch  power, 
unlefs  it  be  given  to  him,  for  every  man  is  origi- 
nally free ;  and  the  fame  power  that  makes  him 
king,  gives  him  all  that  belongs  to  his  being  king. 
.'Tis  not  therefore  an  inherent,  but  a  delegated  power; 

and 


Sea.  38.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     317 

and  whoever  receives  it,  is  accountable  to  thofe  tliat 
gave  it  J  for,  as  our  author  is  forced  to  confefs,  '"  they 
"  w^ho  give  authority  by  commiffion,  do  always  re- 
"  tain  more  than  they  grant." 

(2.)  The  law  for  annual  parliaments  exprefly  de- 
clares it  not  to  be  in  the  king's  power,  as  to  the  point 
of  their  meeting,  nor  confequently  their  continuance. 
For  they  meet  to  no  purpofe  if  they  may  not  con- 
tinue to  do  the  work  for  which  they  meet ;  and  it 
were  abiurd  to  give  them  a  power  of  meeting,  if 
they  might  not  continue  till  it  be  done  :  for,  as 
Grotius  fays,  "  qui  dat  finem,  dat  media  ad  finem 
"  neceflaria/'  The  only  reafon  why  parliaments  do 
meet,  is  to  provide  for  the  public  good  ;  and  they 
by  law  ought  to  meet  for  that  end.  They  ought 
not  therefore  to  be  diflblved,  till  it  be  accom- 
■plilhied.  For  this  reafon  the  opinion  given  by 
Trefilian,  that  kings  might  difiblve  parliaments  at 
their  pleafure,  was  judged  to  be  a  principal  part  of  his 
treafon. 

(3.)  We  have  already  proved,  that  Saxons,  Danes, 
Normans,  &c.  who  had  no  title  to  the  crown, 
were  made  kings  by  micklegemots,  wittenagemots, 
and  parliaments ;  that  is,  either  by  the  whole  people, 
or  their  reprefentatives  :  others  have  been  by  the 
fame  authority  reftrained,  brought  to  order,  or  de- 
pofed.  But  as  it  is  impoffible  that  fuch  as  were  not 
kings,  and  had  no  title  to  be  kings,  could  by  virtue 
of  a  kingly  power  call  parliaments,  when  they  had 
none ;  and  abfurd  to  think  that  fuch  as  were  in  the 
throne,  who  had  not  governed  according  to  law, 
would  fuffer  themfelvesto  be  reftrain'd,  imprifoned, 
or  depofed  by  parliaments,  called  and  fitting  by  them- 
felves,  and  ftill  depending  upon  their  will  to  be  or 
not  to  be  j  'tis  certain  that  parliaments  have  in  thcm- 

fclves 


3i8  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

felves  a  power  of  fitting  and  ading  for  the  public 
good. 

2.  To  the  fecond.  The  various  cuftoms  ufed  in 
cledlions  are  nothing  to  this  queflion.  In  the  counties, 
which  make  up  the  body  of  the  nation,  all  free- 
holders have  their  votes :  thefe  are  properly  Gives, 
members  of  the  commonv^ealth,  in  diftinftion  from 
thofe  who  are  only  Incolae,  or  inhabitants,  villains, 
and  fuch  as  being  under  their  parents,  are  not  yet 
fui  juris.  Thefe  in  the  beginning  of  the  Saxons 
reign  in  England,  compofed  the  micklegemots  ;  and 
when  they  grew  to  be  fo  numerous  that  one  place 
could  not  contain  them,  or  fo  far  difperfed,  that 
without  trouble  and  danger  they  could  not  leave  their 
habitations,  they  deputed  fuch  as  (hould  rcprefent  - 
them.  When  the  nation  came  to  be  more  polifhed, 
to  inhabit  cities  and  towns,  and  to  fet  up  feveral  arts 
and  trades  ;  thofe  who  exercifed  them  were  thought 
to  be  as  ufeful  to  the  commonwealth,  as  the  free- 
holders in  the  country,  and  to  deferve  the  fame 
privileges.  But  it  not  being  reafonable  that  every 
one  fliould  In  this  cafe  do  what  he  pleafed,  it  was 
thought  fit  that  the  king  with  his  council  (which 
always  confifted  of  the  Proceres  and  Magnates  Reg- 
ni)  fliould  judge  what  numbers  of  men,  and  what 
places  deferved  to  be  made  corporations  or  bodies 
politic,  and  to  enjoy  thofe  privileges,  by  which  he 
did  not  confer  upon  them  any  thing  that  was  his, 
but  according  to  the  truft  repofed  in  him,  did  dif- 
penfe  out  of  the  public  flock  parcels  of  what  he  had 
received  from  the  whole  nation  :  and  whether  this 
was  to  be  enjoy'd  by  all  the  inhabitants,  as  in  Weft- 
minfler ;  by  the  common  hall,  as  in  London  3  or  by 
the  mayor,  aldermen,  jurats  and  corporation,  as  in 
other  places,  'tis  the  fame  thing  :    for  in  all  thefe 

cafes  the  king  does  only  diilribute,  not  give,  and 

under 


Seft.  3 8 .  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      3 1 9 

under  the  fame  condition  that  he  might  call  parlia- 
ments, that  is,  for  the  publick  good.  This  indeed 
increafes  the  honour  of  the  perfon  intruded,  and 
adds  weight  to  the  obligation  incumbent  upon  him  > 
but  can  never  change  the  nature  of  the  thing,  fo  as 
to  make  that  an  inherent,  which  is  only  a  delegated 
power.  And  as  parliaments,  when  occafion  re- 
quired, have  been  afiembled,  have  refus'd  to  be 
diflblved  till  their  work  was  finifhed,  have  feverely 
punifhed  thofe  who  went  about  to  perfuade  kings, 
that  fuch  matters  depended  abfolutely  upon  their 
will,  and  made  laws  to  the  contrary  :  'tis  not  to  be 
imagined,  that  they  would  not  alfo  have  interpofed 
their  authority  in  matters  of  charters,  if  it  had  been 
obferved  that  any  king  had  notorioufly  abufed  the 
truft  repofed  in  him,  and  turned  the  power  to  his 
private  advantage,  with  which  he  was  entrufted  for 
the  public  good. 

That  which  renders  this  moft  plain  and  fafc,  is, 
that  men  chofen  in  this  manner  to  ferve  in  parlia- 
ment, do  not  ad:  by  themfelves,  but  in  conjunction 
with  others  who  are  fent  thither  by  prefcription ; 
nor  by  a  power  derived  from  kings,  but  from  thofe 
that  choofe  them.  If  it  be  true  therefore  that  thofe 
who  delegate  powers,  do  always  retain  to  themfelves 
more  than  they  give,  they  who  fend  thefe  men,  do 
not  give  them  an  abfolute  power  of  doing  whatfo- 
ever  they  pleafe,  but  retain  to  themfelves  more  than 
they  confer  upon  their  deputies  :  they  muft  there- 
fore be  accountable  to  their  principals,  contrary  to 
what  our  author  afferts.  This  continues  in  force, 
tho'  he  knows  not,  that  ''  any  knights  and  burgef- 
''  fes  have  ever  been  queftioned  by  thofe  that  fent 
*'  them  ;"  for  it  cannot  be  concluded  they  ought 
not,  or  may  not  be  queftion'd,  becaufe  none  have 
been  queftioned.     But  in  truth  they  are  frequently 

queftioned  : 


320  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

queftloned  :  the  people  do  perpetually  judge  of  the 
behaviour  of  their  deputies.     Whenfoever  any  of 
them  has  the  misfortune  not  to  fatisfy  the  major 
part  of  thofe  that  chofe  him,  he  is  fure  to  be  reject- 
ed with  difgrace  the  next  time  he  fhall  defire  to  be 
chofen.     This  is  not  only  a  fufficient  punifhment 
for  fach  faults,  as  he  who  is  but  one  of  five  hundred 
may  probably  commit,  but  as  much  as  the  greateft 
and  freeft  people  of  the  world  did  ever  inflid:  upon 
their  commanders  that  brought  the  greateft  loffes 
upon  thciTi.     Appius   Claudius,   Pomponius,    and 
Terentius  Varro,  furvived  the  greateft  defeats  that 
ever  the  Romans  fufFer*d  ;  and  tho'  they  had  caufed 
them  by   their  folly  and  perverfenefs,  were  never 
punifhed.     Yet  I  think  no  man  doubts  that  the  Ro- 
mans had  as  much  right  over  their  own  officers,  as 
the  Athenians  and  Carthaginians,  who  frequently 
put  them  to  death.     They  thought  the  mind  of  a 
commander  would  be  too  much  diftrafted,  if  at  the 
fame  time  he  ihould  ftand  in  fear  both  of  the  enemy 
and  his  own  countrymen :  and  as  they  always  en- 
deavoured to  choofe  the  beft   men,  they  would  lay 
no  other  neceffity  upon  them  of  performing  their 
duty,  than  what  was  fuggefted  by  their  own  virtue 
and  love  to  their  country.     'Tis  not  therefore  to  be 
thought  ftrange,  if  the  people  of  England  have  fol- 
lowed the   moft  generous  and  moft  profperous  ex- 
amples.    Befides,  if  any  thing  has  been  defeftive  in 
their  ufual  proceedings  with  their  delegates,  the  in- 
convenience has  been  repaired  by  the  modefty  of  the 
beft  and  wifeft  of  them  that  v»^ere  chofen.     Many  in 
all  ages,  and  fometimes  the  whole  body  of  the  com- 
mons, have  refufed  to  give  their  opinion  in  fome 
cafes,  till  they  had  confulted  with  thofe  that  fent 
them  :  the  houfes  have  been  often  adjourned  to  give 
them  time  to  doit  y  and  if  this  Vvxre  done  more  fre- 
quently. 


Sefl.  sS.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    321 

quently,  or  that  the  towns,  cities  and  counties,  had 
on  fome  occafions  given  inflrudlions  to  their  depu- 
ties, matters  would  probably  have  gone  better  in 
parliament  than  they  have  often  done. 

3 .  The  queflion  is  not,  v/hether  the  parliament 
be  impeccable  or  infallible,  but  whether  an  aflembly 
of  nobiUty,  with  a  houfe  of  commons  compofed  of 
thofe  who  are  befl  efleemed  by  their  neighbours  in 
all  the  towns  and  counties  of  England,  are  more  or 
lefs  fubjed:  to  error  or  corruption,  than  fuch  a  man, 
woman  or  child,  as  happens  to  be  next  in  blood  to 
the  laft  king.  Many  men  do  ufually  fee  more  than 
one ;  and  if  we  may  believe  the  wifeft  king,  ' '  In 
*'  the  multitude  of  counfellors  there  is  fafety  ** 
Such  as  are  of  mature  age,  good  experience,  and 
approved  reputation  for  virtue  and  wifdom,  will 
probably  judge  better  than  children  or  fools.  Men 
are  thought  to  be  m.ore  fit  for  war  than  women  ; 
and  thofe  who  are  bred  up  in  difcipline,  to  under- 
ftand  it  better  than  thofe  who  never  knew  any  thing 
of  it.  If  fome  counties  or  cities  fail  to  choofe  fuch 
men  as  are  eminently  capable,  all  will  hardly  be  fo 
miftaken  as  to  chufe  thofe  who  have  no  more  of 
wifdom  or  virtue,  than  is  ufually  intail'd  upon  fa- 
milies. But  Filmer  at  a  venture  admires  the  pro- 
found wifdom  of  the  king  ;  tho'  beiides  fuch  as  we 
have  known,  hiflories  give  us  too  many  proofs, 
that  all  thofe  who  have  been  poiTefTed  of  crowiis, 
have  not  excelled  that  way.  He  fpeaks  of  kings  in 
general,  and  makes  no  difference  between  Solomon 
and  his  foolifli  fon.  He  diftinsuiflies  not  our  Ed- 
ward  the  firir  from  Edward  tlie  i'econd  -,  Edward  the 
third  from  Richard  the  fecond  -,  or  Henry  the  fifth 
from  Henry  the  fixth.  And  becaufe  all  of  them 
were  kings,  all  of  them,  if  he  deftrves  credit,  muft 

*  Prov.  xi.  14. 

/.  Vol.  II,  Y  neecs 


32^  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

needs  have  been  endow'd  with  profound  wifdom. 
David  was  wife  as  an  angel  of  God ;  therefore  the 
prefent  kings  of  France,  Spain  and  Sweden,  muft 
have  been  fo  alfo,  when  they  were  but  five  years 
old:  Joan  of  Caftille  could  not  bemad,  nor  the  two 
Joans  of  Naples  infamous  ftrumpets,  or  elfe  all  his 
arp-uments  fall  to  the  o-round.     For  tho'  Solomon's 
wdfdom  furpalTed  tliat  of  all  the  people,  yet  men 
could  not  relv  equally  upon  that  of  Rehoboam,  un- 
lefs  it  had  been  equal.     And  if  they  are  all  equal  in 
wifdom  when  they  come  to  be  equally  kings,  Perfes 
of  Macedon  v/as  as  great  a  captain  as  Philip  or  Alex- 
ander ;  Commodus  and  Heliogabalus  were  as  wife 
and  virtuous  as  Marcus   Aurelius   and   Antoninus 
Pius :  nay,  Chriftina  of  Sweden  in  her  infancy  was 
as  fit  to  command  an  army  as  her  valiant  father.  If 
this  be  mofl  abfurd  and  falfe,  there  can  be  neither 
reafon  nor  fenfe  in  propofing,  as  our  author  does, 
that  the  power  fhould  be  in  the  king,  becaufe  the 
parllamient  is  not  infallible.     It  is,  fays  he,  **  for 
the  head  to  correal,  and  not  to  exped:  the  confent 
of  the  members  or  parties  peccant  to  be  judges  in 
their  own  cafes  ;  nor  is  it  needful  to  confine  the 
king,"  &c.     Befides  that  this  is  dire6lly  contrary 
to  his  ovv^n  fundamental  maxim,  that  no  man  muft 
be  the  judge  of  his  own  cafe,  in   as  much  as  this 
would  put  the  power  into  the  king's  hands,  to  decide 
the  controverfies  between  himfelf  and  the  people, 
in  which  his  own  pailions,  private  intereft,  and  the 
corrupt  counfels  of  ill  minifters,  will  always  lead 
him  out  of  the  way  of  juftice,  the  inconveniences 
that  may  arife  from  a  poffibilitv  that  the  parliament 
or  people  is  not  infallible,  will  be  turned  to  the  moft 
certain  and  deftructive  mlfchiefs ;  as  muft  have  fallen 
out  in  Spain,  if,  upon  a  fuppofition  that  the  eftates 
of  Caftille  might  err,  the  corredtlon  of  fuch  errors 

had 


(C 


Sed.  38.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      32? 

had  been  left  to  the  profound  wifdom  and  exquifite 
judgment  of  Joan  their  queen  and  head,  who  was 
ftark  mad.  And  the  hke  may  be  faid  of  many- 
other  princes,  who  through  natural  or  accidental 
infirmities^  want  of  age,  or  dotage,  have  been  ut- 
terly  unable  to  judge  of  any  thing. 

The  matter  wdll  not  be  much  mended,  tho'  I  pafs 
from  ideots  and  lunaticks,  to  fuch  as  know  well 
enough  how  to  clothe  and  feed  themfelves,  and  to 
perform  the  ordinary  functions  of  life  5  and  yet  have 
been  as  uncapable  of  giving  a  right  judgment  con- 
cerning the  w^eighty  matters  of  government,  as  the 
weakefl:  of  children,  or  the  moil:  furious  of  madmen. 
Good  manners  forbid  me  to  enumerate  the  examples 
of  this  kind,  which  Europe  has  produced  even  in 
this  age  :  but  I  fliould  commit  a  greater  fault,  if  I 
did  in  lilence  pafs  over  the  extravagances  of  thofc, 
who  being  moil  wtak  in  judgment  and  irregular  in 
their  appetites,  have  been  moft  impatient  of  any  re- 
ftraint  upon  their  Vv^ill.  The  brave  Gufcavus  Adol- 
phus,  and  his  nephew  Carolus  Guftavus,  who  was 
not  inferior  to  him  in  valour,  wifdom,  and  love  to  his 
people,  v/ere  content  w^ith  the  power  that  the  laws  of 
their  country  gave  to  them :  but  Frederick  the  fourth 
of  Denmark  never  refled  till  hehadoverthrov/n  the  li- 
berty of  that  nation.  Cafmiir  by  attempting  the  like 
in  Poland,  loft  almoft  half  of  that  kingdom ;  and  fly- 
ing from  the  other,  left  all  to  be  ravaged  by  Swedes, 
Tartars,  and  Cofacks.  The  prefeiit  emperor  whopaf- 
fed  his  time  in  fetting  longs  in  mulic  with  a  wretched 
Italian  eunuch,  when  he  ouelit  to  have  been  at  the 
head  of  a  brave  army,  raifed  to  oppofe  the  Turks  in 
the  year  1664,  ^^^^  which  under  good  conducl  might 
have  overthrown  the  Ottoman  empire,  as  foon  as  he 
was  delivered  from  the  fear  of  that  enemy,  fell  upon 
his  ov/n  fabiecis  with  fuch  crueltv,  that  they  are 

Y  z  novr- 


DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

now  forced  to  fly  to  the  Turks  for  protedlion  ;  the 
proteftants  efpecially,  who  find  their  condition  more 
tolerable  under  thofe  profefTed  enemies  to  chrifliani- 
ty,  than  to  be  expofed  to  the  pride,  avarice,  perfi- 
dioufaefs  and  violence  of  the  Jefuits  by  whom  he  is 
governed.  And  the  qualities  of  the  king  of  Portu- 
gal are  fo  v/ell  known,  together  with  the  condition 
to  which  he  would  have  brought  his  kingdom  if  he 
had  not  been  fent  to  the  Tercera's,  that  1  need  not 
fpeak  particularly  of  him. 

If  kings  therefore,  by  virtue  of  their  office,  are 
conftituted  judges  over  the  body  of  their  people,  be- 
caufe  the  people,  or  parliaments  reprefenting  them, 
are  not  infallible  5  thofe  kings  who  are  children, 
fools,  difabled  by  age,  or  madmen,  are  fo  alfo; 
women  have  the  fame  right  where  they  are  admitted 
to  the  fucceffion  ^  thofe  men  who,  tho'  of  ripe  age 
and  not  fuperannuated,  nor  diredly  fools  or  mad- 
men, yet  abfolutely  uncapable  of  judging  important 
affairs,  or  by  their  paffions,  interefts,  vices,  or  malice 
and  wickednefs  of  their  minifters,  fervants  and  fa- 
vourites, are  fet  to  opprefs  and  ruin  the  people,  en- 
joy the  fame  privilege  -,  than  which  nothing  can  be 
imagined  more  abfurd  and  abominable,  nor  more 
diredlly  tending  to  the  corruption  and  deftrudlion  of 
the  nations  under  them,  for  whofe  good  and  fafety 

our  author  confeifes  they  have  their  power. 

\. 

SECT.      XXXIX. 

Thofe  kings  only  are  heads  of  the  people^  ^who  are  good, 
wifey  and  feek  to  advance  no  intereji  but  that  of 
the  puhlick, 

THE  worft  of  men  feldom  arrive  to   fuch   a 
degree  of  impudence,  as  plainly  to  propofe 
the  moft  niifchievous  follies  and  enormities.     They 

who 


Sea.  39.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      325 

who  are  enemies  to  virtue,  and  fear  not  God,  are 
afraid  of  men,  and  dare  not  offer  fuch  things  as  the 
world  will  not  bear,  left  by  that  means  they  fhould 
overthrow  their  own  defigns.  All  poifon  muft  be 
difguifed,  and  no  man  can  be  perfuaded  to  eat 
arfenic,  unlefs  it  be  cover'd  with  fomething  that 
appears  to  be  harmlefs.  Creufa  would  have  abhorr'd 
Medea  s  prefent,  if  the  peftilent  venom  had  not  been 
hidden  by  the  exterior  luftre  of  gold  and  gems. 
The  garment  that  deftroy*d  Hercules  appeared  beauti- 
ful ;  and  Eve  had  neither  eaten  of  the  forbidden  tree, 
nor  given  the  fruit  to  her  huiband,  if  it  had  not 
feemed  to  be  good  and  pleafant,  and  fhe  had  not 
been  induced  to  believe  that  by  eating  it  they  fliould 
both  be  as  Gods.  The  fervants  of  the  devil  have 
always  followed  the  fame  method :  their  malice  is 
carried  on  by  fraud,  and  they  have  feldom  deftroy'd 
any,  but  fuch  as  they  had  firft  deceived.  Truth 
can  never  conduce  to  mifchief,  and  is  beft  difcovered 
by  plain  words  5  but  nothing  is  more  ufual  with  ill 
men  than  to  cover  their  mifchievous  defigns  w^ith 
figurative  phrafes.  It  would  be  too  ridiculous  to  fay 
in  plain  terms,  that  all  kings  without  diftindlion  are 
better  able  to  judge  of  all  matters  than  any  or  all 
*  their  people;  they  muft  therefore  be  called  the  head, 
that  thereby  they  may  be  inverted  with  all  the 
preeminences  which  in  a  natural  body  belong  to  that 
part;  and  men  muft  be  made  to  beleve  the 
analogy  between  the  natural  and  political  body  to 
be  perfed.  But  the  matter  muft  be  better  ex- 
amined before  this  mortal  poifon  feem  fit  to  be 
fwallowed, 

The  word  Head  is  figuratively  ufed  botli  in  fcrip- 
ture  and  profane  authors  in  feveral  fenfes,  in  relation 
to  places  or  perfons,  and  always  implies  fomething 
of  real  or  feeming  preeminence  in  point  of  honour  or 

Y  3  jurifdidion. 


326  D  I  S  C  O  U  R  S  E  S        Chap.  Ill; 

juriiclidion.  Thus  Damafcus  is  faid  to  be  the  head 
of  Syria;  Samaria  of  Ephraim,  and  Ephraim  of  the 
ten  tribes :  that  is,  Ephraim  was  the  chief  tribe  ; 
Samaria  v/as  the  chief  city  of  Epliraim,  and  Da- 
mafcus of  Syria  -,  tho'  it  be  certain  that  Ephraim  had 
no  jurifdiftion  over  tiie  other  tribes,  nor  Samaria 
over  the  other  cities  of  Ephraim,  but  every  one 
according  to  the  law  had  an  equal  power  within  itfelf, 
or  the  territories  belonging  to  it;  and  no  privileges 
were  p^ranted  to  one  above  another,  except  to  Jerufa- 
lem,  in  the  matter  of  religion,  becaufe  the  temple  was 
placed  there. 

The  words  alfo  head,  prince,  principal  man,  or 
captain,  feem  to  be  equivocal ;  and  in  this  fenfe  the 
lame  men  are   called    heads  of  the  tribes,  princes 
in  the  houfes  of  their  fathers  :  and  'tis  faid  *,  that 
two  hundred  heads  of  the  tribe  of  Reuben  were 
carried  away  captive  by  Tiglath  Pilezer,  and  pro- 
portionably   in    the  other   tribes ;    which    were  a 
ilrange  thing,  if  the  word  did  imply  that  fupreme, 
abiblute  and  infinite  power  that  our  author  attributes 
to  it  :    and  no  man   of  lefs  underftanding  than  he, 
can  comprehend  how  there  fliould  be  two  hundred 
or  more  fovereign  unlimited  powers  in  one  tribe, 
moft  efpecially  when  'tis  certain  that  one  feries  of 
kings  had  for  m.any  ages  reigned  over  that  tribe  and 
nine  more ;  and  that  every  one  of  thofe  tribes,  as  well 
as  the  particular  cities,  even  from  their  firfl:  entrance 
into  the  promifed  land,  had  a  full  jurifdidion  within 
itlelf     When  the  Gileadites  came  to  Jephtha  -f-,  he 
fufpedted  them,    and  aiked   whether   indeed  they 
intended  to  make  him  their  head  ?  they  anfwered, 
if  he  would  lead  them  againfl  the  Ammonites,  he 
fhould  be  their  head.     In  the  like  fenfe  when  Jul. 
Caefar  in  defpair  would  have  killed  himfelf,  one  of 

'*  I  Chrgn.  v.  -f  J'^tlg,  xii, 

his 


Sea.  39.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      327 

his  foldiers  diffuaded  him  from  that  defign,  by  telling 
him,  "  "*  That  the  fafety  of  fo  many  nations  that 
'^  had  made  him  their  head,  depending  upon  his  life, 
"  it  would  be  cruelty  in  him  to  take  fuch  a  refolu- 
''  tion."  But  for  all  that,  when  this  head  was 
taken  off^  the  body  did  Itill  fubfil^  :  upon  which  I 
obferve  many  fundamental  differences  between  the 
relation  of  this  figurative  head  (even  when  the  word  is 
rightly  applied)  and  that  of  the  natural  head  to  their 
refpecStive  bodies. 

The  figurative  heads  may  be  many^  the  natural  but 
one. 

The  people  makes  or  creates  the  figurative 
head,  the  natural  is  from  itfelf,  or  connate  with  the 
body. 

The  natural  body  cannot  change  or  fubfift  with- 
out the  natural  head  ;  but  a  people  may  change  and 
fubiift  very  w^ell  without  the  artificial.  Nay,  if  it 
had  been  true,  that  the  world  had  chofen  Ccefar, 
as  it  was  not  (for  he  was  chofen  only  by  a  fadious 
mercenary  army,  and  the  foundeft  part  fo  far  oppofed 
that  elecTiion,  that  they  brought  him  to  think  of 
killing  himfelf)  there  could  have  been  no  truth  in 
this  flattering  afiertion,  ^^  That  the  fafety  of  the 
*'  the  whole  depended  upon  his  life:"  for  the  world 
could  not  only  fubfifi:  without  him,  bat  without  any 
fuch  head,  as  it  had  done,  before  he  by  the  help  of 
his  corrupted  foldiery  had  ufurped  the  power;  vv-hich 
alfo  fhews  that  a  civil  head  may  be  a  matter  of  con- 
venience, but  not  of  neceffity.  Many  nations  have 
had  none  ;  and  if  the  expreffion  be  fo  far  flretched, 
as  to  make  it  extend  to^  the   anniial    or   temporary 

*  Cum  tot  ab  hac  anima  populornm  vita  falufque 
Pendeat,   &  tantns  caput  hoc  fibi  fecerit  orbis, 
Sasvitia  eft  voluiiTe  moxu     Lucan. 

Y  4  magiflratcs 


328 ^DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

magiitrates  fet  up  by  the  Athenians,  Carthaginians, 
Romans,  and  other  antient  commonwealths,  or  to 
thofe  at  this  day  in  Venice,  Holland,  Switzerland, 
and  other  places,  it  muft  be  confefs'd  that  the  people 
who  made,  depofed,  abrogated,  or  abolifhed  both 
the  magifirates  and  magiftracies,  had  the  power  of 
framing,  directing  and  removing  their  heads,  which 
our  author  will  fay  is  mod  abfurd.  Yet  they 
did  it  without  any  prejudice  to  themfelves^  and  very 
often  much  to  their  advantage. 

In  mentioning  thefe  vaft  and  eifential  diflferences 
between  the  natural  and  political  head,  I  no  way 
iotend  to  exclude  others  that  may  be  of  equal  weight; 
but  as  all  figurative  exprefTions  have  their  ftrength 
only  from  fimilitude,  there  can  be  little  or  none  in 
this,  which  differs  in  fo  many  important  points,  and 
can  therefore  be  of  no  effed:. 

However,  right  proceeds  from  identity,  and  not 
from  fimilitude.  The  right  of  a  man  over  me  is  by 
being  my  father,  and  not  by  being  like  my  father. 
If  I  had  a  brother  fo  perfectly  refembling  nle  as  to 
deceive  our  parents,  which  has  fometimes  happened 
to  tv/ins",  it  could  give  him  no  right  to  any  thing 
that  is  mine.  If  the  powxr  therefore  of  correfting 
the  parties  peccant,  which  our  author  attributes  to 
kings,  be  grounded  upon  the  name  of  head,  and  a 
refemblance  between  the  heads  of  the  body  politic 
and  body  natural ;  if  this  refemblance  be  found  to 
be  exceedingly  imperfecft,  uncertain,  or  perhaps  no 
way  relating  to  the  m^atter  in  queftion  ^  or  tho'  it  did, 
and  were  abfolutely  perfed:,  could  confer  no  right ; 
the  allegation  of  it  is  impertinent  and  abfurd. 

This  being  cleared,  'tis  time  to  examine,  what 
the  office  of  the  head  is  in  a  natural  body,  that  we 
may  learn  from  thence  why  that  name  is  fometimes 

given 


Seel.  39.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     329 

given  tothofe  who  are  eminent  in  political  bodies,  and 
to  whom  it  does  belong. 

Some  men  account  the  head  to  be  fo  abfolutely 
the  feat  of  all  the  fenfes,  as  to  derive  even  that  of 
feeling,  which  is  exercifed  in  every  part,  from  the 
brain  :  but  I  think  it  is  not  doubted  that  all  the  reft 
have  both  their  feat  and  funftion  in  the  head  ;  and 
whatfoever  is  ufeful  or  hurtful  to  a  man,  is  by  them 
reprefented  to  the  underftanding  ;  as  Ariflotle  fays, 
*'  Nihil  eft  in  intelledlu,  quod  non  fit  prius  in  fenfu/' 
This  is  properly  the  part  of  every  magiftrate :  he  is 
the  fentinel  of  the  public,  and  is  to  reprefent  what  he 
difcovers  beneficial  or  hurtful  to  the  fociety  3  which 
office  belongs  not  only  to  the  fupreme,  but  propor- 
tionably  to  the  fubordinate.  In  this  fenfc  were  the 
chief  men  among  the  If  aelites  called  ''  Heads  of 
"  their  fathers  houfe,  choice  and  mighty  men  of 
^'  valour,  chief  of  the  princes  *.''  And  in  the  fol- 
lowing chapter  mention  is  made  of  "  nine  hundred 
*'  and  fifty  Benjamites,  chief  men  in  the  houfe  of 
*^  their  fathers."  Thefe  men  exercifed  a  charitable 
care  over  fuch  as  were  inferior  to  them  in  power  and 
valour,  without  any  fhadow  of  fovereignty,  or 
pofiibility  that  there  could  be  fo  many  fovereigns  : 
and  fuch  as  were  under  their  care  are  faid  to  be  their 
brethren;  which  is  not  a  word  of  majefty  and  domi- 
nation, but  of  dearnefs  and  equality.  The  name 
therefore  of  head  may  be  given  to  a  fovereign,  but 
it  implies  nothing  of  fovereignty  ;  and  mufl  be  ex- 
ercifed with  charity,  which  always  terminates  in 
the  good  of  others.  The  head  cannot  corredl  or 
chaftife  -,  the  proper  work  of  that  part  is  only  to 
indicate,  and  he  who  takes  upon  him  to  do  more,  is 
not  the  head.  A  natural  body  is  homogeneous,  and 
cannot  fubfift  if  it  be  not  fo.  We  cannot  take  one 
part  of  a  horfe,  another  of  a  bear,  and  put  upon 

*   1  Chron.  vii.  40. 

them 


330  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

them  the  head  of  a  lion  ;  for  it  would  be  a  monfter, 
that  would  have  neither  aftion  nor  life.  The  head 
muft  be  of  the  fame  nature  with  the  other  members 
or  it  cannot  fubfift.  But  the  lord  or  mailer  differs 
in  fpecie  from  his  fervants  and  Haves,  he  is  not 
therefore  properly  their  head. 

Belides,  the  head  cannot  have  a  fubliftence  w^ith- 
out  the  body,  nor  any  intereft  contrary  to  that  of  the 
body  3  and  'tis  impoffible  for  any  thing  to  be  good 
for  the  head,  that  is  hurtful  to  the  body.  A  prince 
therefore,  or  magiftrate,  who  fets  up  an  intereft  in 
himfelf  diftin(5l  from,  or  repugnant  to  that  of  the 
people,  renounces  the  title  or  quality  of  their  head. 
Indeed,  Mofes  was  the  head  of  the  Ifraelites  5  for 
when  God  threatned  to  deftroy  that  people,  and 
promifed  to  make  him  a  great  nation,  he  waved  the 
particular  advantages  offered  to  himfelf,  interceded 
for  them,  and  procured  their  pardon.  Yet  he  was 
not  able  to  bear  the  weight  of  tht  government  alone, 
%ut  defired  that  fome  might  be  appointed  to  affift 
him,  Gideon  was  the  head  of  the  fame  people,  but 
he  would  not  reien  himfelf,  nor  fuffer  his  fons  to 
reign  over  them.  Samuel  was  alfo  their  head  >  he 
took  nothing  from  any  man,  defrauded  none,  took 
bribes  from  no  man,  oppreffed  none  ;  God  and  the 
people  were  his  witneffes  :  he  blamed  them  for  their 
rebellion  againft  God  in  aiking  a  king,  but  v/as  no 
way  concerned  for  himfelf  or  his  family.  David 
likewife  had  a  right  to  that  title  3  for  he  deiired  that 
God  would  fpare  the  people,  and  turn  the  effefl:  of 
his  anger  againft  himfelf,  and  the  houfe  of  his 
father.  But  Rehoboam  was  not  their  head ;  for  tho' 
he  acknowledged  that  his  father  had  laid  a  heavy 
yoke  upon  them,  yet  he  told  them  he  would  add  to 
the  weight  ^  and  that  if  his  father  had  chaftifed  them 

with 


Stdi.o^g.    CONCERNING  GOVERNxMENT.    331 

with  whips,  he  would  chaftife  them  with  fcorpions. 
The  head  is  no  burden  to  the  body,  and  can  lay  none 
upon  it  'y  the  head   cannot  chaftife   any    member ; 
and  he  who  does  fo,  be  it  more  or  iefs,  cannot  be 
the  head.     Jeroboam  was  not  the  head  of  the  revolt- 
ing tribes ;  for  the  head  takes  care  of  the  members, 
and  to  provide  for  the  fafety  of  the  whole  :  but  he 
through  fear  that  the  people  going  to  Jerufalem  to 
worfhip,  fliould  return  to  the  houfe  of  David,  by 
fetting  up  idols  to  fecure  his  own  interefts,  drew  guilt 
and  deftrudlion  upon  them.      Tho'  it  fhould  be 
granted  that  Auguftus  by  a  gentle  ufe  of  his  power, 
had  in  a  manner  expiated  the   deteftable  villanies 
committed  in  the  acquifition,  and  had  truly  deferved 
to  be  called  the  head  of  the  Romans ;  yet  that  title 
could  no  v/ay  belong  to  Caligula,  Claudius,  Nero 
or  Viteliius,  who  neither  had  the  qualities  requir'd 
in  the  nead,  nor  the  underftanding  or  v/ill  to  perform 
the  ofF.ce       Nay,    if   I  fiiould  carry  the  matter 
farther,  and  acknowledge  that  Brutus^  Cincinnatus, 
Fabius,  Camillus,  and  others,  who  in  the  time  of  their 
annual  or  iliorter  m.agiftracies,  had  by  their  vigilance, 
virtue  and  care  to  preferve  the  city  in  fafety,  and  to 
provide   for  the  public  good,  pcriorm.ed  the  office 
of  the   head,    and    might   deferve    the   name ;    I 
might  juftly  deny  it  to  the  greateil  princes  that  have 
been  in  the  world,  who  having  their  power  for  life, 
and  leaving  it  to  defcend  to  their  children,  have 
wanted  the  virtues  requir'd.  for  the  performance    of 
their  duty  :  and  I  fhould  Iefs  fear  to  be  guilty  of  an 
abfurdity  in  faying,  that  a  nation  might  every  year 
chan2;e  its  head,  than  that  he  can  be  the  head,  who 
cares  not  for  the  members,  nor  underftands  the  things 
that  conduce  to  their  good,  moft  efpecially  if  he  fet 
up  an  intereft  in  himfelf  againft  them.     It  cannot 
be  faid  that  thefe  are  imaginary  cafeS;,  and  that  no 

prince 


332  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

prince  does  thefe  things ;  for  the  proof  is  too  eafy> 
and  the  examples  too  numerous.  Caligula  could  not 
have  wifhed  the  Romans  but  one  head,  that  he 
might  cut  it  off  at  once,  if  he  had  been  that  head, 
and  had  advanced  no  intereft  contrary  to  that  of  the 
members.  Nero  had  not  burn'd  the  city  of  Rome, 
if  his  concernments  had  been  infeparably  united  to 
thofe  of  the  people.  He  who  caufed  above  three 
hundred  thoufand  of  his  innocent  unarmed  fubjefls 
to  be  murder'd,  and  fiird  his  whole  kingdom  with 
fire  and  blood,  did  fet  up  a  perfonal  intereft  repug- 
nant to  that  of  the  nation ;  and  no  better  teftimony 
can  be  required  to  fliew  that  he  did  fo,  than  a  letter 
written  by  his  fon,  to  take  off  the  penalty  due  to  one 
of  the  chief  minifters  of  thofe  cruelties,  for  this  rea- 
fon,  that  what  he  had  done,  was  "  by  the  command 
"  and  for  the  fervice  of  his  royal  father."  King 
John  did  not  purfue  the  advantage  of  his  people, 
when  he  endeavoured  to  fubjecl  them  to  the  Pope  or 
the  Moors.  And  whatever  prince  feeks  affiftance 
from  foreign  powers,  or  makes  leagues  with  any 
ftranger  or  enemy  for  his  own  advantage  againft 
his  people,  however  fecret  the  treaty  may  be,  de- 
clares himfelf  not  to  be  the  head,  but  an  enemy  to 
them.  The  head  cannot  ftand  in  need  of  an  ex- 
terior help  againft  the  body,  nor  fubfift  when  divided 
from  it.  He  therefore  that  courts  fuch  an  affiftance, 
divides  himfelf  from  the  body;  and  if  he  do  fub- 
fift, it  muft  be  by  a  life  he  has  in  himfelf,  dif- 
tindl  from  that  of  the  body,  which  the  head  cannot 
have. 

But  befides  thefe  enor»iities,  that  teftify  the  moft 
wicked  rage  and  fury  in  the  higheft  degree,  there  is 
another  pradtice,  which  no  man  that  knows  the 
world  can  deny  to  be  common  with  princes,  and 
incompatible  with  the  nature  of  a  head,     The  head 

cannqt 


Sea.  39.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     333 

cannot  defire  to  draw  all  the  nourifhment  of  the  body 
to  itfelf,  nor  more  than  a  due  proportion.     If  the 
reft  of  the  parts  are  fick,  weak  or  cold,  the  head 
fufFers  equally  with  them,  and  if  they  perifli  muft 
perifh  alfo.     Let  this  be  compared  with  the  adlions 
of  many  princes  we  know,  and  we  fhall  foon  fee 
which  of  them  are  heads  of  their  people.     If  the 
gold  brought  from  the  Indies  has  been  equally  diftri- 
buted  by  the  kings  of  Spain  to  the  body    of  that 
nation,  I  confent  they  may  be  called  the  heads.     If 
the  kings  of  Franceaflumenomoreof  therichesof  that 
great  kingdom  than  their  due  proportion,  let  them 
alfo  wear  that  honourable  name.     But  if  the  naked 
backs  and  empty  bellies  of  their  miferable  fubjeds 
evince  the  contrary,  it  can  by  no  means  belong  to 
them.     If  thofe  great  nations  w^afte  and  languifli ; 
if  nothing  be  fo  common  in  the  beft  provinces  be- 
longing to  them,    as  mifery,  famine,    and  all  the 
effed:s  of  the  moft  outragious   opprefiion,    whilft 
their  princes  and  favourites  poffefs  fuch  treafures  as 
the  moft  wanton  prodigality  cannot  exhauft ;  if  that 
which  is  gained  by  the  fweat  of  fo  many  millions  of 
men,  be  torn  out  of  the  mouths  of  their  ftarving 
wives  and  children,  to  foment  the  vices  of  thofe 
luxurious  courts,  or  reward  the  minifters   of  their 
lufts,  the  nourifliment  is  not  diftributed  equally  to 
all  the  parts  of  the  body ;    the  oeconomy  of  the 
whole  is  overthrown,  and  they  who  do  thefe  things, 
cannot  be  the  heads,  nor  the  parts  of  the  body, 
but  fomething  diftin(ft  from  and    repugnant  to    it. 
'Tis  not  therefore  he  who  is  found  in,  or  advanced 
to  the  place  of  the  head,  who  is  truly  the  head : 
'tis  not  he  who  ought,  but  he  who  does  perform  the 
office  of  the  head,  that  deferves  the  name  and  pri- 
vileges belonging  to  the  head.     If  our  author  there- 
fore will  perfuade  us  that  any  king   is  head   of  his 

people. 


334  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Iir. 

people,  he  mufl  do  it  by  arguments  peculiarly 
relating  to  him,  fince  thofe  in  general  are  found  to 
be  falfe.  If  he  fay  that  the  king  as  king  may  diredl 
or  corred:  the  people,  and  that  the  power  of  deter- 
mining all  controverfies  muft  be  referred  to  him, 
becaufe  they  may  be  miftaken,  he  muft  lliow  that 
the  king  is  infallible ;  for  unlefs  he  do  fo,  the  wound 
is  not  cured.  This  alfo  muft  be  by  fome  other  way, 
than  by  faying  he  is  their  head  ^  for  fuch  powers 
belong  not  to  the  office  of  the  head,  and  we  fee  that 
all  kings  do  not  deferve  that  name  :  many  of  them 
want  both  undtrftanding  and  will  to  perform  the 
functions  of  the  head  ;  and  many  adl  diredly  con- 
trary in  the  whole  courfe  of  their  government.  If 
any  therefore  among  them  have  merited  the  glorious 
name  of  heads  of  nations,  it  muft  have  been  by  their 
perfonal  virtues,  by  a  vigilant  care  of  the  good  of 
their  people,  by  an  infeparable  conjunction  of  inte- 
refts  with  them,  by  an  ardent  love  to  every  member 
of  the  fociety,  by  a  moderation  of  fpirit  affecting  no 
undue  fuperiority,  or  afTuming  any  fingular  advantage 
which  they  are  not  willing  to  communicate  to  every 
part  of  the  political  body.  He  who  finds  this 
merit  in  himfelf,  will  fcorn  all  the  advantages  that 
can  be  drawn  from  mifapplied  names:  he  that 
knows  fuch  honour  to  be  peculiarly  due  to  him  for 
being  the  beft  of  kings,  will  never  glory  in  that 
which  may  be  common  to  him  with  the  worft. 
Nay,  whoever  pretends  by  fuch  general  difcourfes  as 
thefe  of  our  author,  to  advance  the  particular  interefls 
of  any  one  king,  does  either  know  he  is  of  no 
merit,  and  that  nothing  can  be  faid  for  him  which 
will  not  as  well  agree  Vv^ith  the  worft  of  men ;  or 
cares  not  what  he  favs  io  he  mav  do  mifchief  and  is 
well  enough   contented,  that  he  v/ho   is  fet  up  by 

fuch 


Sea:.4o-  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      335 

fuch  maxims  as  a  public  plague,    may  fall  in  the 
ruin  he  brings  upon  the  people. 

SECT.     XL. 

Good  laws  prefcribe  eafy  and  fafe  remedies  agai?2/i  the 
evih  proceeding  jrom  the  vices  or  iiifinnities  of  the 
magijirate-,  and  when  thejfail^  they  mnjl  be  fup^ 
plied. 

THOSE  who  defire  to  advance  the  power  of 
the  magiftrate  above  the  law,  •  would  per- 
fuade  us,  that  the  difficulties  and  dangers  of  inquir- 
ing into  his  adions,  or  oppofing  his  will  when  em- 
ployed in  violence  and  injuftics,  are  fo  great,  that  the 
remedy  is  always  worfe  than  the  difeafe ;  and  that 
'tis  better  to  fuffer  all  the  evils  that  may  proceed  ii  om 
his  infirmities  and  vices,  than  to  hazard  the  confe- 
quences  of  difpleafing  him.  But,  on  the  contrary,  I 
think  and  hope  to  prove, 

1.  That  in  well-confl:ituted  governments,  the 
remedies  agalnft  ill  magiftrates  are  eaiy  and  fafe. 

2.  That  'tis  good,  as  well  for  the  magiftrate  as 
the  people,  fo  to  conftitute  the  government,  that 
the  remedies  may  be  eafy  and  fafe. 

3.  That  how  dangerous  and  difficult  foever  they 
may  be  through  the  defedts  of  the  firft  conftitution^ 
they  muft  be  tried. 

To  the  firft;  'tis  moft  evident  that  in  well-regu- 
lated governments  thefe  remedies  have  been  found 
to  be  eafy  and  fafe.  The  kings  of  Sparta  were  not 
fuffered  in  the  leaft  to  deviate  from  the  rule  of  the 
law:  and  Theopompus  one  of  thofe  kings,  in 
whofe  time  the  Ephori  were  created,  and  the  regal 
power  much  reftrained,  doubted  not  to  affirm,  that 
it  was  by  that  means  become  more  lafting  and  more 
fecure^.     Paufanias  had  not  the  name  of  kine,  but 

*  Platarch. 

commanded 


33$  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

commanded  in  the  war  agalnft  Xerxes  with  more 
than  regal  power ;  neverthelefs  being  grown  infolent, 
he  was  without  any  trouble  to  that  flate  baniflied, 
and  afterwards  put  to  death.  Leontidas  father  of 
Cleomenes,  was  in  the  like  manner  banifhed.  The 
fecond  Agis  was  moft  unjuflly  put  to  death  by  the 
Ephori,  for  he  was  a  brave  and  a  good  prince,  but 
there  was  neither  danger  nor  difficulty  in  the  adtion. 
Many  of  the  Roman  magiflrates,  after  the  expulfion 
of  the  kings,  feem  to  have  been  defirous  to  extend 
their  power  beyond  the  bounds  of  the  law  5  and 
perhaps  fome  others  as  well  as  the  Decemviri,  may 
have  deiigned  an  abfolute  tyranny  ;  but  the  firft 
were  reftrained,  and  the  others  without  much  diffi- 
culty fupprefled.  Nay,  even  the  kings  were  fo  well 
kept  in  order,  that  no  man  ever  pretended  to  the 
crown  unlefs  he  were  chofen,  nor  made  any  other 
ufe  of  his  power  than  the  law  permitted,  except  the 
lafb  Tarquin,  who  by  his  infolence,  avarice  and 
cruelty,  brought  ruin  upon  himfelf  and  his  family, 
I  have  already  mentioned  one  or  two  dukes  of  Ve- 
nice who  were  not  lefs  ambitious,  but  their  crimes 
returned  upon  their  own  heads,  and  they  periflied 
without  any  other  danger  to  the  flate  than  what  had 
paifed  before  their  treafons  were  difcovered.  Infi- 
nite examples  of  the  like  nature  may  be  alledged ; 
and  if  matters  have  not  at  all  times,  and  in  all  places, 
fucceeded  in  the  fame  manner,  it  has  been  becaufe 
the  iame  courfes  were  not  every  where  taken ;  for 
all  things  do  fo  far  follow  their  caufes,  that  being 
ordered  in  the  fame  manner,  they  will  always  pro- 
duce the  fame  efFefts. 

2.  To  the  fecond;  fuch  a  regulation  of  the  ma- 
glftratical  power  is  not  at  all  grievous  to  a  good  ma- 
giflrate.  He  who  never  defires  to  do  any  thing  but 
what  he  ought,    cannot  deiire  a  power  of  doing 

a  what 


Sea.  40.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     ^37 

what  he  ought  not,  nor  be  troubled  to  find  he  can- 
not do  that  which  he  would  not  do  if  he  could. 
This  inability  is  alio  advantageous  to  thofe  who  are 
evil  or  unwife  -,  that  fincc  they  cannot  govern  them- 
felves,  a  law  may  be  impofcd  upon  them,  left  by 
following  their  own  irregular  will,  they  bring  de- 
ftrudion  upon  themfelves,  their  families  and  people, 
as  many  have  done.  If  Apollo  in  the  fable  had 
not  been  too  indulgent  to  Phaeton.,  in  grantinp^  his 
ill-conceived  requeft,  the  furious  youth  had  not 
brought  a  neceflicy  upon  Jupiter,  either  of  deftroy- 
ing  him,  or  fuffering  the  world  to  be  deftroyed  by 
him. 

Befides,  good  and  wife  men  know  the  weight  of 
fovereign  power,  and  milHoubt  their  own  ftrength. 
Sacred  and  human  hi'ories  furnifli  us  with  many 
examples  of  thofe  who  have  feared  the  luftre  of  a 
crown.  Men  that  find  in  themfelves  no  delight  in 
doing  mifchief,  know  not  what  thoughts  may  in- 
finuate  into  their  minds,  when  they  are  raifed  too 
much  above  their  fphere.  They  who  were  able  to  bear 
adverfity,  have  been  precipitated  into  ruin  by  profpe- 
rity*  When  the  prophet  told  Hazael  the  vilianies 
he  would  commit,  he  anfwcred,  "  Is  thy  fcrvant  a 
*^  dog,  that  I  (hould  do  thefe  things?"  but  yet  he 
did  them.  I  know  not  vi^here  to  find  an  example 
'of  a  man  more  excellently  quaufied  than  Alexander 
of  Macedon ;  but  he  fell  uiider  the  weirfit  of  his 
own  fortune,  and  grew  to  exceed  thole  in  vices 
whom  he  had  conquered  by  his  virtue.  The  nature  of 
man  can  hardly  iuffer  fuch  violent  changes  without 
being  difordered  by  them  ;  and  every  one  ought  to 
enter  into  a  juft  diffidence  of  himfelf,  and  fear  the 
temptations  that  have  deftroyed  fo  many.  }f  any 
man  be  fo  happily  born,  fo  carefilly  educated,  fo 
eftablifl:Led  in  virtue,  that  no  ftoru;  can  ihake  him. 

Vol.  IL  .         Z  nor 


338  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IH 

nor  any  poiibn  corrupt  him,  yet  he  will  confider  he 
is  mortal ;  and  knowing  no  more  than  Solomon, 
whether  his  fon  fliall  be  a  wife  man  or  a  fool,  he 
will  always  fear  to  take  upon  him  a  power,  which 
muft  prove  a  moft  peflilent  evil  both  to  the  perfon 
that  has  it,  and  to  thofe  that  are  under  it,  as  foon 
as  it  ihall  fall  into  the  hands  of  one,  who  either 
knows  not  how  to  ufe  it,  or  may  be  eafily  drawn 
to  abufe  it.     Suprem^e  magiflrates  always  walk  in 
obfcure  and  llippery  places :  but  w4ien  they  are  ad- 
vanced fo  high,  that  no  one  is  near  enough  to  fup- 
port,  direct  or  reftrain  them,  their  fall  is  inevitable 
and  mortal.     And  thofe  nations  that  have  wanted 
the  prudence  rightly  to  balance  the  powers  of  their 
magiftrates,  have  been  frequently  obliged  to  have 
recourfe  to  the  iriofl  violent  remedies,    and  with 
much   difficulty,  danger  and  blood,  to  punifh  the 
crimes  which  they  might  have  prevented.     On  the 
other  fide,  fuch  as  have  been  more  wife  in  the  con- 
flitution  of  their  governments,  have  always  had  re- 
gard to  the  frailty  of  human  nature,  and  the  cor- 
ruption reigning  in  the  hearts  of  men ;  and  being 
lefs  liberal  of  the  power  over  their  lives  and  liberties, 
have  referved  to  themfelves  fo  much  as  might  keep 
their  magiftrates  v/ithin  the  limits  of  the  law,  and 
oblige  them  to  perform  the  ends  of  their  inflitution. 
And  as  the  law  which  denounces  fevere  penalties 
for  crimes,  is  indeed  merciful  both  to  ill  men,  v/ho 
are  by  that  means  deterred  from  committing  them  y 
and  to  tlie  good,  vvho  otherwife  would  be  deftroyed: 
fo  thofe  nations   that  have  kept  the  reins  in  their 
hands,  have  by  the  fame  adl  provided  as  well   for 
the  fafety  of  their  princes  as  for  their  own.     They 
v/ho  kiiov/  the  law  is  well  defended,  feldom  at- 
tempt to  ilibvert  it :  they  are  not  eafily  tempted  to 
:un  into  exceifes^  v/lien  fuch  bounds  are  fet,  as  may 

not 


■I";  • 


Sea.  40.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      339 

not  fafely  be  tranfgrelied  ;  and  whilft  they  are  by  this 
means  rendered  more  moderate  in  the  exercife  of 
their  power,  the  people  is  exempted  from  the  odious 
necefiity  of  fuffering  all  manner  of  indignities  and 
miferies,  or  by  their  deflrudlion  to  prevent  or  avenge 
them. 

3.  To  the  third:  if  tliefe  rules  have  not  been 
well  obferved  in  the  firft  conftitution,  or  from  the 
changes  of  times,  corruption  of  manners,  infenfible 
encroachments,  or  violent  ufurpations  of  princes, 
have  been  rendered  ineffedlual,  and  the  people  ex- 
pofed  to  all  the  calamities  that  may  be  brought  upon 
them  by  the  weaknefs,  vices  and  malice  of  the  prince 
or  thole  who  govern  him,  I  confefs  the  remedies 
are  more  difficult  and  dangerous ;  but  even  in  thofe 
cafes  they  muft  be  tried.  Nothing  can  be  feared 
that  is  worfe  than  what  is  fuitered,  or  muft  in  a 
iliort  time  fall  upon  thofe  vv^ho  are  in  this  condition. 
They  who  are  already  fallen  into  all  that  is  odious/ 
fhameful  and  miiferable,  cannot  juftly  fear.  When 
things  are  brought  to  fuch  a  pafs,  the  boldeft  coun- 
fels  are  the  mioft  fafe  -,  and  if  they  muft  *^  perifli 
who  lie  ftill,  and  they  can  but  periih  who  are  m.oft 
adtive,  the  choice  is  eafily  made.  Let  the  danger 
be  never  fo  great,  there  is  a  poffibility  of  fafety  whilft 
men  have  life,  hands,  arm.s,  and  courage  to  ufe  them : 
but  that  people  muft  certainly  perifli,  who  tamely 
fuffer  themfelves  to  be  opprefTed,  either  by  the  in-. 
juftice,  cruelty  and  m.alice  of  an  ill  magiftrate,  or  by 
thofe  who  prevail  upon  the  vices  and  innrm.ities  of 
weak  princes.  "Tis  in  vain  to  fay,  that  this  may  give 
occaiion  to  men  of  raifing  tumults  or  civil  war^  for 
tho*  thefe  are  evils,  yet  they  are  not  the  greateft  of 

*.  Moriendum  viclis,  moriendum  dcc'icis:   id  fo.Uim  intcreil,  an  in- 
ter  cri'.'iatas  &  ludibria,  an  pro  virtute    expircmus.     C^  Tcici:. 

Quod  fi  nocen'.esinnocentcique  id^^m  ex  11115  mant^a:,  acrioris  viri  eft 


Jiien  6  perire.   Ibid. 


Z  z  evils. 


340  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

evils.     Civil  war  in  Macchiavel's  account  is  a  difeafe, 
but  tyranny  is  the  death  of  a  ftate.     Gentle  ways 
are  firft  to  be  ufed,  and  'tis  beft  if  the  work  can 
be  done  by  them  -,  but  it  muft  not  be  left  undone 
if  they  fail.      'Tis  good  to  ufe  fupplications,  ad- 
vices and  remonftrances ;   but  thofe  who  have  no 
regard  to  juftice,  and  will  not  hearken  to  counfel, 
muft  be  conflrained.     'Tis  folly  to  deal  othenvife 
with  a  man  who  will  not  be  guided  by  reafon,  and 
a  magiftrate  who  defpifes  the  law  :  or  rather,  to  think 
him  a  man,  who  re] efts  the  eflential  principle  of  a 
man  >  or  to  account  him  a  magiflrate  who  over- 
throws the  law  by  which  he  is  a  magiflrate.     This 
is  the  laft  refult ;  but  thofe  nations  muft  come  to  it, 
which  cannot  other  wife  be  preferved.     Nero's  mad- 
nefs  was  not  to  be  cured,  nor  the  mifchievous  effefts 
of  it  any  other  wife  to  be  fupprefTed  than  by  his  death. 
He  who  had  fpared  fuch  a  monfter  when  it  was  in 
his  power  to  remove  him,  had  brought  deftruclion 
upon  the  whole  empire  3  and  by  a  foolifli  clemency  - 
made  himfelf  the  author  of  his  future  villanies.  This 
would  have  been  yet  more  clear,  if  the  world  had 
then  been  in  fuch  a  temper  as  to  be  capable  of  an 
intire  liberty.     But  the  antient  foundations  had  been 
overthrown,  and  nothing  better  could  be  built  upon 
the  new,  than  fomething  that  might  in  part  reiift 
that  torrent  of  iniquity  which  had  overflow'd  the 
beft  part  of  the  world,  and  give  m.ankind  a  little 
time  to  breathe  under  a  lefs  barbarous  mafter.     Yet 
all  the  beft  men  did  join  in  the  work  that  was  then 
to  be  done,  tho'  they  knew  it  would  prove  but  im- 
pcrfeft.     The  facred  hiftory  is  not  without  exam.ples 
of  this  kind  :  when  Ahab  had  fubverted  the  law, 
fjt  up  lalfe  witnefTes  and  corrupt  judges  to  deftroy 
the  innocent,  killed  the  prophets,   and  eftabliflied 
idolatrv,  his  houfe  muft  then  be  cut  off,  and  his 

blood 


Sea.  40.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      341 

blood  be  lickt  up  by  dogs.  When  matters  are 
brought  to  this  pafs,  the  declfion  is  eafy.  The 
queftion  is  only,  whether  the  punifhment  of  crimes 
fliall  fall  upon  one  or  a  few  perfons  who  are  guilty 
of  them,  or  upon  a  whole  nation  that  is  innocent; 
If  the  father  may  not  die  for  the  fon,  nor  the  fon  for 
the  father,  but  every  one  mufl  bear  the  penalty  of 
his  own  crimes,  it  would  be  moft  abiurd  to  punijfh 
the  people  for  the  guilt  of  princes.  \¥hen  the  earl 
of  Morton  was  fent  ambaffador  to  queen  Elizabeth 
by  the  eftates  of  Scotland,  tojuitify  their  proceed- 
ings againft  Mary  their  queen,  whom  they  had 
obliged  to  renounce  the  government ;  he  alledged 
amongft  other  things  the  murder  of  her  hufband 
plainly  proved  againft  her  ;  afferted  the  antient  right 
and  cuftom  of  that  kingdom,  of  *  examining  the 
adlions  of  their  kings  ;  by  which  means,  he  faid, 
many  had  been  -j-  punifhed  with  death,  imprifon- 
ment  and  exile  ;  confirmed  their  adlions  bv  the  ex- 
amples  of  other  nations  ^  and  upon  the  whole  matter 
concluded,  that  if  ihe  was  ftill  permitted  to  live,  it 
was  not  on  account  of  her  innocence,  or  any  exem.p- 
don  from  the  penalties  of  the  law,  but  from  the 
mercy  and  clemency  of  the  people,  who  contenting 
themfelves  with  a  refignation  of  her  right  and  power 
to  her  fon,  had  fpared  her.  This  difcourfe,  which 
is  fet  down  ^t  large  by  the  hiftorian  cited  on  the 
margin,  being  of  fuch  flrength  in  it  felf,  as   never 

*  Animadvertendl  in  regcs. 

•\  Morce,  vinculis  &  exilio  puniti.  Buch^ti.  hift.  Scot.  I.  20.  Qai 
tot  reges  regno  exuerunt,  t'xilio  damnarunt,  carceribus  coercicrunt, 
fnpplicio  denique  aiTecerunt,  nee  anquam  tamen  de  accrbitate  legis. 
minuenda  mentio  eft  facia,  &c.  Ibid.  Faci'e  apparet  regnuin  nihil 
aliud  elTe,  quam  mutuam  inter  regem  &  populam  ftipulationem.  Nou 
dc  iilarum  fandionum  genere,  qua^  mutatioa:bus  tcmporum  iunt  ob- 
moxire,  fed  in  primo  generis  humani  exortu,  Sc  mutuo  piopt  omniuiTi 
gentium  conienfa  coaiprobata;,  Sc  una  cum  rerum  iiaiura  infragiles 
-&  lempiternas  perennen:.     Ibid. 

Z  3  to 


342  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill; 

to  have  been  any  otherwife  anfwered  than  by  railing, 
and  no  way  diiapproved  by  queen  Elizabeth  or  her 
council  to  whom  it  was  made,  either  upon  a  gene- 
ral account  of  the  pretenfions  of  princes  to  be  exemp- 
ted from  tkc  penalties  of  the  law,  or  any  pretext 
that  they  had  particularly  mifapplied  them  in  rela- 
tion to  their  queen,  I  may  juftly  fay,  that  when 
nations  fall  under  fuch  princes  as  are  either  utterly 
iincapable  of  m.aking  a  right  ufe  of  their  power,  or 
do  maliciouily  abufe  that  authority  with  which  they 
are  entruiled.  thofe  nations  ftand   obliged,  by  the 
duty  they  owe  to  themfeives  and  their  poilerity,  to 
ufe  the  beft  of  their  endeavours  to  rem.ove  the  evil, 
whatever  dang-er  or  difficulties  they  may  meet  with 
in  the   performance.     Pontius  the   Samnite  faid  as 
truly  as  bravely  to  his  countrymen,  that  *^  '^  thofe 
"  arms  v/ere  juft  and  pious  that  were  neceflary,  and 
"  neceiTary   v/hen  there  was  no  hope  of  fafety  by 
"  any  other  way."     This  is  the  voice  of  mankind, 
and  is  diflik'd  only  by  thofe  princes,  who  fear  the 
deferved  punifhments  may  fail  upon  them  ;  or  by 
their  fervants  and  flatterers,  v/ho  being  for  the  moft 
part  the  authors  of  their  crimes,  think  they  fliall  be 
involved  in  their  ruin. 

SECT.      XLI. 

T^he  people  for  whom  and  by  whom  .'he  rnagljlrate  is 
create:^ ^  can  only  judge  "whdber  he  rig.  tly  perform 
his  cfrice  or  not. 


'/"T^  1 S  com.m.only  raid,  that  no  man  ought  to  be 

Jthe  iudp;e  of  his  own  cafe  ;  and  our   author 
JO  ' 

lays  much  v/eight  upon  it  as  a  fundam.ental  m/axim, 
tho'  according  to  his  ordinary  inconilancy  he  over- 

*  Ju'la  piiq-je  lunt  arma,    c]  lioMS  nece.Taria,   &    nccciyr.ria,    qui- 
his  TiuWa.  nifi  in  armis  fpcs  ell  falutis.  T,  Li^>    lib.  8. 

throws 


Sea.  41.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      343 

throws  it  in  the  cafe  of  kings,  where  it  ought  to 
take  place  if  in  any  ;  for  it  often  falls   out  that  no 
men  are  lefs  capable  of  forming  a  right  judgment 
than  they.     Their   paffions   and  interefts  are  moft 
powerful  to  difturb  or  pervert  them.     No  men  are 
fo  liable  to  be  diverted  from  jullice  by  the  flatteries 
of  corrupt  fervants.    They  never  ad:  as  kings,  except 
for  thole  by  whom  and  for  whom  they  are  created  ; 
and   adling  for  others,  the  account  of  their  actions 
cannot  depend  upon  their  own  will.     Neverthelefs 
I  am  not  afraid  to  fay,  that  naturally  and  properly  a 
man  is  the  judge  of  his  ov/n   concernments.     No 
one  is  or  can  be  deprived  of  this  privilege,  unlefs  by 
his  own  confent,  and  for  the  good  of  that  fociety 
into  which  he  enters.     This  right  therefore   muft 
neceffarily  belong  to  every  man  in  all  cafes,  except 
only  fuch  as  relate  to  the  good  of  the  community, 
for  whofe  fake  he  has  diverted  him.felf  of  it.     If  I 
find  my  felf  affli(fled  with  hunger,  thirft,  wearinefs, 
cold,  heat,  or  ficknefs,  'tis  a  folly  to  tell  me,  I  ought 
not  to  fcek  meat,  drink,  reft,  fhelter,  refrefliment, 
or  phyfick,  becaufe  I  muft  not  be  the  judge  of  my 
'own  cafe.     The  like  may  be  faid  in  relation  to  my 
houfe,  land,  or  eftate  3  I  may  do  what  I  pleafe  with 
them,  if  I  bring  no  damage  upon  others.     But  I 
muft  not  fet  fire  to  my  houfe,  by  which  my  neigh- 
bour's houfe  may  be  burnt.     I  may  not  ered:  forts 
upon  my  own  lands,  or  deliver  them  to  a  foreign 
enemy,  who  may  by  that  means  infeft  my  country. 
I  may  not  cut  the  banks  of  the  fea,  or  thofe  of  a 
river,    left    my  neighbour's  ground  be  oversown, 
becaufe  the  fociety  into  which  I  am  incorporated, 
.would  by  fjch  means  receive  prejudice.     My  land 
is  not  fimply  my   own,  but    upon  condition  that  I 
(liall  not  thereby  bring  damage  upon  the  publick, 
by  v/hich  I  am  proteCkd  in  the   peaceable  enjoy- 

Z  4  ment 


344  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

ment  and  innocent  ufe  of  what  I  poffefs.  But  this 
fociety  leaves  me  a  liberty  to  take  fervants,  and  put 
them  away  at  my  pleafure.  No  man  is  to  dired: 
me,  of  what  quality  or  number  they  fliall  be,  or 
can  tell  me  whether  I  am  well  or  ill  ferved  by  them. 
Nay,  the  ftate  takes  no  other  cognizance  of  what 
pafles  between  me  and  them,  than  to  oblige  me  to 
perform  the  contradls  I  m.ake,  and  not  to  do  that  to 
them  which  the  law  forbids :  that  is  to  fay,  the 
power  to  which  I  have  fubmitted  my  felf,  exercifes" 
that  jurifdidion  over  me,  which  was  eflabliflied  by 
my  confent,  and  under  which  I  enjoy  all  the  bene- 
fits of  life,  which  are  of  more  advantage  to  me  than 
my  liberty  could  have  been,  if  I  had  retained  it 
wholly  in  my  felf.  The  nature  alfo  and  meafure  of 
of  this  fubmiffion  mufl  be  determined  by  the  reafons 
that  induce  me  to  it.  The  fociety  in  which  I  live 
cannot  fubfift  unlefs  by  rule  ;  the  equality  in  which 
men  are  born  is  fo  perfed:,  that  no  man  will  fuifer 
his  natural  liberty  to  be  abridged,  except  others  do 
the  like  :  I  cannot  reafonably  expedl  to  be  defended 
from  wrojig,  unlefs  I  oblige  my  felf  to  do  none^  or 
to  fuffer  the  punifliment  prefcribed  by  the  law,  if  I 
perform  not  my  engagement.  But  without  preju- 
dice to  the  fociety  into  which  I  enter,  I  may  and  do 
retain  to  my  felf  the  liberty  of  doing  what  I  pleafe  in 
all  things  relating  peculiarly  to  my  felf,  or  in  which 
I  am  to  feek  my  own  convenience. 

Now  if  a  private  man  is  not  fubjedl  to  the  judg- 
ment of  any  other,  than  thofe  lo  whom  he  fubmits 
himfelf  for  his  own  fafety  and  convenience;  and 
notwithftanding  that  fubmiflion,  ftill  retains  to  him- 
felf the  right  of  ordering  according  to  his  own  will 
all  things  merely  relating  to  himfelf,  and  of  doing 
wliat  he  pleafes  in  that  which  he  does  for  his  own 
fake;  the  lame  right  muft  m.ore  certainly  belong  to 

whole 


Sea.  41-  CONCERNING    GOVERNMENT.    345 

whole  nations.  When  a  controverfy  happens  be- 
tween Caius  and  Seius  in  a  matter  of  right,  neither 
of  them  may  determine  the  caufe,  but  it  mufl  be  re- 
ferred to  a  judge  fuperior  to  both  ;  not  becaufe  'tis 
not  fit  that  a  man  lliould  be  judge  of  his  own  cafe, 
but  becaufe  they  have  both  an  equal  right,  and  nei- 
ther of  them  owes  any  fubjedtion  to  the  other.  But 
if  there  be  a  contefl  between  me  and  my  fervants 
concerning  my  fervice,  I  only  am  to  decide  it  :  he 
muft  ferve  me  in  my  own  way,  or  be  gone  if  I  think 
fit,  tho'  he  ferve  me  never  fo  well ;  and  I  do  him  no 
wrong  in  putting  him  away,  if  either  I  intend  to 
keep  no  fervant,  or  find  that  another  will  pleafe  me 
better.  I  cannot  therefore  ftand  in  need  of  a  judge, 
unlefs  the  contefl  be  with  one  who  lives  upon  an 
equal  foot  with  me.  No  man  can  be  my  judge, 
unlefs  he  be  my  fuperior  ;  and  he  cannot  be  my 
fuperior,  who  is  not  fo  by  my  confent,  nor  to  any 
other  purpofe  than  I  confent  to.  This  cannot  be 
the  cafe  of  a  nation,  which  can  have  no  equal  within 
it  felf.  Controverfies  may  rife  with  other  nations, 
the  decifion  of  which  may  be  left  to  judges  chofen 
by  mutual  agreement ;  but  this  relates  not  -  to  our 
^  queflion.  A  nation,  and  mofl  efpecially  one  that 
is  powerful,  cannot  recede  from  its  own  right,  as  a 
private  man  from  the  knowledge  of  his  own  weak- 
nefs  and  inability  to  defend  himfelf  muft  come  un- 
der the  protedion  of  a  greater  power  than  his  own. 
The  ftrength  of  a  nation  is  not  in  the  magiftrate, 
but  the  ftrength  of  the  magiftrate  is  in  the  nation. 
The  wifdom,  induftry  and  valour  of  a  prince  may 
add  to  the  glory  and  greatnefs  of  a  nation,  but  the 
foundation  and  fubftance  will  alv/ays  be  in  it  felf. 
If  the  magiftrate  and  people  were  upon  equal  terms, 
as  Caius  and  Seius,  receiving  equal  and  mutual  ad- 
vantages from  each  other,  no  man  could  be  judge 
4  of 


346  DISCOURSES       Chap.  Ill, 

cf  their  differences,  but  fuch  as  they  Ihould  fet  up 
for  that  end.  This  has  been  done  by  many  nations. 
The  antient  Germans  referred  the  decifion  of  the 
moil:  difficult  matters  to  their  priefts  :  the  Gauls 
and  Britons  to  the  druids :  the  Mahometans  for 
fome  aces  to  the  caHfs  of  Babylon:  the  Saxons  in 
England,  when  they  had  embraced  the  chriftian 
religion,  to  their  clergy.  Whilft  all  Europe  lay 
under  the  popifli  fuperftition,  the  decifion  of  fuch 
matters  was  frequently  affumed  by  the  pope  ;  men 
often  fabmitted  to  his  judgment,  and  the  princes 
that  refifted  were  for  the  moil  part  excommunicated, 
depofed  and  defliroyed.  Ail  this  was  done  for  the 
fame  reafons.  Thefe  men  were  accounted  holy 
and  infpired,  and  the  fentence  pronounced  by  them 
was  ufuaily  reverenced  as  the  judgment  of  God,  who 
was  thought  to  direCl  them  3  and  all  thofe  who  re- 
fufed  to  fubmit,  v/ere  efieemed  execrable.  But  no 
man,  or  number  of  men,  as  I  think,  at  the  inflitu- 
tion  of  a  magiftrate  did  ever  fay,  If  any  difference 
happen  between  you  or  your  fucceffors  and  us,  it 
fliall  be  determined  by  your  felf  or  by  them,  whe- 
ther they  be  men,  women,  children,  mad,  fooliili^ 
or  vicious.  Nay  if  any  fuch  thing  had  been,  the 
folly  turpitude  and  madnefs  of  fuch  a  fandion  or 
ftipulation  muft  neceffarily  have  deflroy'd  it.  But 
if  no  fuch  thing  was  ever  known,  or  could  have  no 
effect  if  it  had  been  in  any  place,  'tis  moft  abfurd  to 
impofe  it  upon  all.  The  people  therefore  cannot 
be  deprived  of  their  natural  rights  upon  a  frivolous 
pretence  to  that  which  never  was  and  never  can  be. 
They  who  create  magiftracies,  and  give  to  them 
fuch  name,  form  and  power  as  they  think  fit,  do 
only  know,  whether  the  end  for  which  they  were 
created^  be  performed  or  not.  They  who  give  a 
being  to  the  power  which  had  none,  can  only  judge 

whether 


Sea.  41^    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    347 

whether  it  be  employ 'd  to  their  welfare,  or  turned 
to  their  ruin.  They  do  not  fet  up  one  or  a  few  men 
that  they  and  their  pofterity  may  live  in  fplendor 
and  greatnefs,  but  that  juftice  may  be  adminiftred, 
virtue  eflabliilied,  and  provilion  made  for  the  pub- 
lick  fafety.  No  wife  man  will  think  this  can  be 
done,  if  thofe  who  fet  themfelves  to  overthrow  the 
law,  are  to  be  their  own  judges.  If  Caligula,  Nero, 
Vitellius,  Domitian,  or  Heliogabalus,  had  been 
fubjed:  to  no  other  judgment,  they  would  have 
compleated  the  deftruffion  of  the  empire.  If  the 
difputes  between  Durftus,  Evenus  the  third,  Dar- 
dannus,  and  other  kings  of  Scotland,  with  the  nobi- 
lity and  people,  might  have  been  determined  by 
themfelves,  they  had  efcaped  the  punilhments  they 
fufFer'd,  and  ruined  the  nation  as  they  defigned. 
Other  methods  were  taken  -,  they  periflied  by  their 
madnefs  5  better  princes  were  brought  into  their 
places,  and  their  fucceiTors  were  by  their  example 
admoniflied  to  avoid  the  ways  that  had  proved  fatal 
to  them.  If  Edward  the  fecond  of  England,  with 
Gavefton  and  the  Spencers,  Richard  the  fecond 
with  Trefilian  and  Vere,  had  been  permitted  to  be 
the  judges  of  their  own  cafes,  they  who  had  mur- 
dered the  beft  of  the  nobility  would  have  purfued 
their  defigns  to  the  deftrudion  of  fuch  as  remained, 
the  enilaving  of  the  nation,  the  fubverfion  of  the 
conflitution,  and  the  eftablifhment  of  a  mere  tyran- 
ny in  the  place  oi  a  mixed  monarchy.  But  our  an- 
ceilors  took  better  meafures  :  they  who  had  felt  the 
fmart  of  the  vices  and  follies  of  their  princes,  knew 
what  remedies  were  mofl  fit  to  be  apphcd  as  well 
as  the  beft  time  of  applying  them.  They  found  vhe 
effeds  of  extreme  corruption  in  governm.ent  to  be 
fo  defperately  pernicious,  that  nations  muil  ncxeffa- 
rily  perifh.  unlcfs  it  be  corredled,  and  the  ftate  re- 
duced 


34S  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

duced  to  Its  firft  principle,  or  altered.  Which  being 
the  cafe,  it  was  as  eafy  for  them  to  judge,  whether 
the  governor  who  had  introduced  that  corruption 
fliouid  be  brought  to  order,  removed  if  he  would 
not  be  reclaimed,  or  whether  he  fhould  be  fuffer'd 
to  ruin  them  and  their  poflerity,  as  it  is  for  me  to 
judge,  whether  I  fliould  put  away  my  fervant,  if  I 
knew  he  intended  to  poifon  or  murder  me,  and  had 
a  certain  facility  of  accomplifhing  his  defign ;  or 
whether  I  fhould  continue  him  in  my  fervice  till  he 
had  performed  it.  Nay  the  matter  is  fo  much  the 
more  plain  on  the  fide  of  the  nation,  as  the  difpro- 
portion  of  merit  between  a  whole  people,  and  one 
or  a  few  men  entrufted  with  the  power  of  governing 
them,  is  greater  than  between  a  private  man  and  his 
fervant.  This  is  fo  fully  confirmed  by  the  general 
confent  of  mankind,  that  we  know  no  government 
that  has  not  frequently  either  been  altered  in  form, 
or  reduced  to  its  original  purity,  by  changing  the 
families  or  perfons  who  abufed  the  power  with 
which  they  had  been  entrufi:ed.  Thofe  who  have 
wanted  wifdom  and  virtue  rightly  and  feafonably  to 
perform  this,  have  been  foon  dellroy'd ;  like  the 
Goths  in  Spain,  who  by  omitting  to  curb  the  fury 
of  Witza  and  Rodrigo  in  time,  became  a  prey  to 
the  Moors.  Their  kingdom  by  this  means  deftroy'd 
was  never  reftored,  and  the  remainder  of  that  nation 
ioining  with  the  Spaniards  whom  they  had  kept  in 
fubjedion  for  three  or  four  ages,  could  not  in  lefs 
than  eight  hundred  years,  expel  thofe  enemies  they 
might  have  kept  out,  only  by  removing  two  bafe  and 
vitious  kings.  Such  nations  as  have  been  fo  cor- 
rupted, that  when  they  have  applied  themfelves  to 
feek  remedies  to  the  evils  they  fuffered  by  wicked 
magiftrates,  could  not  fall  upon  fuch  as  were  pro- 
portionable to  the  difeafe,  have  only  vented  their 

paflions 


Sea.  41.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      349 

paflions  in  deftroying  the  immediate  inftniments  of 
their  oppreffion,  or  for  a  while  dela5^ed  their  utter 
ruin.  But  the  root  ftill  remaining,  it  foon  produc- 
ed the  fame  poifonous  fruit,  and  either  quite  dc- 
ftroyed,  or  made  them  languifli  in  perpetually  mi- 
fery.  The  Roman  empire  was  the  moil  eminent 
example  of  the  firft  5  many  of  the  monfters  that 
had  tyrannized  over  them  were  killed,  but  the  great- 
efl  advantage  gained  by  their  death,  was  a  refpite 
from  ruin  5  and  the  government  which  ought  to 
have  been  eftablifhed  by  good  laws,  depending  only 
upon  the  virtue  of  one  man,  his  life  proved  to  be  no 
more  than  a  lucid  interval,  and  at  his  death  they  re- 
lapfed  into  the  depth  of  infamy  and  mifery :  and  in 
this  condition  they  continued  till  that  empire  was 
totally  fubverted. 

All  the  kingdoms  of  the  Arabians,  Medes,  Per- 
fians,  Moors,  and  others  of  the  eaft  are  of  the  other 
fort.     Common  fenfe  inftrudls  them,  that  barbarous 
pride,  cruelty  and  madnefs  grown  to  extremity,  can- 
not be  borne :  but  they  have  no  other  way  than  to  kill 
the  tyrant,  and  to  do  the  like  to  his  fucceifor  if  he 
fall  into  the  fame  crimes.     Wanting;  that  wifdom 
and  valour  which  is  required  for  the  inftitution  of 
a  good  government,  they  languifh  in  perpetual  flavery, 
and  propofe  to  themfelves  nothing  better  than  to  live 
under  a  gentle  mailer,  which  is  but  a  precarious  life, 
and  little  to  be  valued  by  men  of  bravery  and  fpirit. 
But  thofe  nations  that  are  more  generous,  who  fct 
a  higher  value  upon  liberty,  and  better  underfland 
.the  ways  of  prefer ving  it,  think  it  a  fmall  matter  to 
defiroy  a  tyrant,    unlefs  they  can  alfo  dcftroy  the 
tyranny.  They  endeavour  to  do  the  v/ork  through- 
ly, either  by  changing  the  government  intirely,  or 
reforming  it   according  to  the   firll:  inftitution,  and 
making  fuch  good  laws  as  may  preferve  its  Integrity 

when 


S50  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

when  reformed.  This  has  been  fo  freqlient  in  all 
the  nations  (both  antient  and  modern)  with  whofe 
ad:ions  we  are  bed  acquainted^  as  appears  by  the 
foregoing  examples,  and  many  others  that  might  be 
alledged,  if  the  cafe  were  not  clear,  that  there  is  not 
one  of  them  which  will  not  furnifh  us  with  many 
inftances ;  and  no  one  magiilracy  now  in  being 
which  does  not  owe  its  original  to  fome  judgment 
of  this  nature.  So  that  they  muft  either  derive  their 
right  from  fuch  actions,  or  coniefs  theyhav^e  none  at 
all  and  leave  the  nations  to  their  original  liberty  of 
fetting  up  thofe  magiflracies  which  beft  pleafe  them- 
felves,  without  any  reftridtion  or  obligation  to  regard 
one  perfon  or  family  more  than  another. 

SECT.     XLII. 

The  perfo7i  that  wears  the  crown  cafinof  determine 
the  affairs  which  the  law  refers  to  the  king. 

OUR  author,  with  the  reft  of  the  vulgar,  feems 
to  have  been  led  into  grofs  errors  by  the  form 
of  writs  fumoioning  perfons  to  appear  before  the 
king.  The  common  ftile  ufed  in  the  trial  of  de- 
linquents ;  the  name  of  the  king's  witneffes  given 
to  thofe  who  accufe  them ;  the  verdids  brought  in 
by  juries,  *^  coram  domino  rege/'  and  the  profecu- 
tion  made  in  the  king's  name,  feem  to  have  caufed 
this.  And  they  who  under ftand  not  thefe  phrafes, 
render  the  law  a  heap  of  the  moft  grofs  abfurdities, 
and  the  king  an  enemy  to  every  one  of  his  fubjeds, 
when  he  ought  to  be  a  father  to  them  all ;  iince 
without  any  particular  coniideration  or  examniation 
of  what  any  witnefs  depofes  in  a  court  of  junice, 
tending  to  the  death,  confifcation,  or  other  punifh- 
ment  of  any  man,  iie  is  called  the  king  s  witnefs 

whether 


Sea,  42.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      351 

whether  he  fpeak  the  truth  or  a  lie,  and  on  that  ac- 
count favoured.  'Tis  not  neceffary  to  aliedge  many 
inftances  in  a  cafe  that  is  fo  plain  ;  but  it  may  not  be 
amifs  to  infert  two  or  three  of  the  mofl  imporlant 
realbns  to  prove  my  affertion. 

1.  If  the  law  did  intend  that  he  or  fhe  who  wears 
the  crown,  fhould  in  his  or  her  perfon  judge  all 
caufes,  and  determine  the  moft  difficult  queftions, 
it  muft,  like  our  author,  prefume  that  they  will  al- 
ways be  of  profound  wifdom  to  comprehend  all  of 
them,  and  of  perfecfl  integrity  always  to  aft  accord- 
ing to  their  underftanding.  Which  is  no  lefs  than 
to  lay  the  foundation  of  the  government  upon  a 
thing  merely  contingent,  that  either  never  was,  or 
very  often  fails,  as  is  too  much  verified  by  ex- 
perience, and  the  hiflories  of  all  nations  -,  or  elfe  to 
refer  the  decifion  of  all  to  thofe  who  through  the 
infirmities  of  age,  fex,  or  perfon,  are  often  inca- 
pable of  judging  the  leaft,  or  fubjeft  to  fuch  paf- 
fions  and  vices  as  v/ould  divert  them  from  juftice 
tho'  they  did  underftand  it ;  both  v/hich  feem  to  be 
almoft  equally  prepofterous. 

2.  The  law  muft  alfo  prefume  that  the  prince  is 
always  prefent  in  all  the  places  where  his  name  is 
ufed.  The  king  of  France  is  (as  I  have  faid  already) 
efteemed  to  be  prefent  "  *  on  the  feat  of  jufiice"  in 
all  the  parliaments  and  fovereign  courts  of  the  king- 
dom :  and  if  his  corporeal  prefence  were  by  that 
phrafe  to  be  underftood,  he  muft  be  in  all  thoie  dif- 
tinft  and  far  diftant  places  at  the  fame  time  ^  which 
abfurdity  can  hardly  be  parallel'd,  unlefs  by  the 
Popifn  opinion  of  T^ranfubjlantiation.  But  indeed 
they  are  fo  far  from  being  guilty  of  fuch  monftrous 
abfurdity,  that  he  caiinot  in  perfon  be  prefent  at 
any  trial,  and  no  man  can  be  judged  if  he  be.     This 

*  Sar  Ton  lit  de  juftice. 

was 


S52  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

was  plainly  aflerted  to  Lewis  the  thirteenth  (who 
would  have  been  at  the  trial  of  the  duke  of  Candale) 
by  the  prefident  de  Bellievre,  who  told  him  that  as 
he  could  judge  no  man  himfelf,  fo  they  could  not 
judge  any  if  he  were  preient :  upon  which  he 
retired. 

3.  The  laws  of  moft  kingdoms  giving  to  kings 
the  confifcation  of  delinquents  eflates,  if  they  in 
their  ovv^n  perfons  might  give  judgment  upon  them, 
they  would  be  conftituted  both  judges  and  parties  ^ 
v/hich  befides  the  forementioned  incapacities  to 
which  princes  are  as  much  fubjed;  as  other  men^ 
w^ould  tempt  them  by  their  own  perfonal  intereft  to 
fubvert  all  manner  of  juftice. 

This  therefore  not  being;  the  meaning;  of  t!  .e  iaw, 
we  are  to  inquire  what  it  is ;  and  the  thing  is  fo 
plain  that  we  cannot  miftake,  unlefs  we  do  it  wil- 
fully. Som.e  r.":ne  muft  be  ufed  in  ail  manner  of 
tranfadtions,  and  in  matters  of  public  concernment 
none  can  be  fo  fit  as  that  of  the  principal  magiftrate. 
Thus  are  leao;ues  made,  not  only  with  kin<?s  and 
emperors,  but  with  the  dukes  of  Venice  and  Genoa, 
the  avoyer  and  fenate  of  a  canton  in  Switzerland, 
the  burgermafler  of  an  imperial  town  in  Germany, 
and  the  ftates  general  of  t::.e  united  provinces.  But 
no  man  thinking,  I  prefume,  thefe  leagues  would 
be  of  any  value,  if  they  could  only  oblige  the  per- 
fons whofe  names  are  ufed,  'tis  plain  that  they  do 
not  ftipulate  only  for  themfelves ;  and  that  their  fti- 
pulations  would  be  of  no  value  if  they  were  merely 
perfonal.  And  nothing  can  more  certainly  prove 
they  are  not  fo,  than  that  we  certainly  know,  thefe 
dukes,  avoyers  and  burgermafcers  can  do  nothing  of 
themfelves.  The  power  of  the  ftates  general  of  the 
united  provinces  is  limited  to  the  poinrs  menrioned 
in  the  a^  of  union  made  at  Utrecht.     The  empire 

is 


Sed.  42.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     ss3 
is  not  obliged  by  any  flipulation  made  by  the  empe- 
ror without  their  conknt.     Nothing  is  more  com- 
mon than  for  one  king  making  a  league  with  another, 
to  exa6t  a  confirmation  of  their  agreemen':,  by  the 
parliaments,  diets  or  general  eilates  ;   becaafe,  fays 
*  Grotius,  a  prince  does  not  fdpulate  for  him felf, 
but  for  the  people  under  his  government ;  and  a  king 
deprived  of  his  kingdom,  lofes  the  right  of  fending 
an  ambaffidor.      The  povv^ers   of  Europe  fliewed 
themfelves  to  be  of  this  opinion  in  the  cafe  of  Por- 
tugal.    When  Philip  the  fecond  had  gained  the  pof- 
feffion,  they  treated  with  him  concerning  the  affairs 
relating  to  that  kingdom  :  Few  regarded  Don  An- 
tonio J  and  no  man  confidered  the  dukes  of  Savoy, 
Parma  or  Braganza,    who   perhaps  had  the  moil 
plaufible  titles :  But  when  his  grandfon  Philip  the 
fourth  had  loft  that  kingdom,  and  the  people  had 
fet  up  the  duke  of  Braganza,  they  all  treated  with 
him  as  king.     And  the  Englifh  court,  tho'  then  in 
amity  with  Spain,  and  not  a  little  influenced  by  a 
Spanifli  fadlion,  gave  example  to  others,  by  treating 
with  him  and  not  with  Spain  touching  matters  re- 
lating to  that  ftate.     Nay,  I  have  been  informed  by 
thofe  who  well  underftood  the  affairs  of  that  tim.e, 
that  the  lord  Cottino;ton  advilinr^  the  late  kino;  not  to 
receive  any  perfons  fent  from  the  duke  of  Braganza, 
rebel  to  his  ally  the  king  of  Spain,  in  the  quality  of 
ambaffadors  j  the  king  anfwered,  that  he  mull  look 
upon  that  perfon  to  be  king  of  Portugal,  who  v/as  • 
acknowledged  by  the  nation.  And  I  am  miftalccn  if 
his  majefty  now  reigning  did  not  find  ail  the  princes 
and  ftates  of  the  world  to  be  of  the  fame  mind, 
when  he  was  out  of  his  kingdom,  and  could  oblige 
jno  man  but  himfelf  and  a  few  followers  by  any  trea- 
ty he  could  make. 

*  De  i'.ir.  bell.  1.  3. 

Vol.  li.  A  a  For 


354  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill 

For  the  fame  reafon  the  names  of  kings  are  ufed 
in  treaties,  when  they  are  either  children,  or  other- 
wife  incapable  of  knowing  what  alliances  are 
fit  to  be  made  or  rejedled  j  and  yet  fuch  treaties 
do  equally  oblige  ihem,  their  fucceffors  and  people, 
as  if  they  were  of  mature  age  ana  fit  for  governnment. 
No  man  therefore  ought  to  think  it  ftrange,  if 
the  king's  name  be  ufed  in  domeftic  affairs,  of 
which  he  neither  ought  nor  can  take  any  cognizance. 
In  thefe  cafes  he  is  perpetually  a  minor :  he  muft 
fuffer  the  law  to  ta!:e  its  due  courfe  -,  and  the 
judges,  tho'  nominated  by  him,  are  obliged  by  oath 
not  to  have  any  regard  to  his  letters  or  perfonal 
commands.  If  a  man  be  fued,  he  muft  appear ; 
and  a  delinquent  is  to  be  tried  coram  rege,  but  "no 
other  wife  than  ''  fecundum  legem  terras,  according 
"  to  the  law  of  the  land,"  not  his  perfonal  will  or 
opinion.  And  the  judgments  given  muft  be  exe- 
cuted, v/hether  they  pleafe  him  or  not,  it  being  al- 
ways underftood  th.t  he  can  fpeak  no  otherwife  than 
the  law  fpeaks,  and  is  always  prefent  as  far  as  the 
law  requires.  For  this  reafon  a  noble  lord  who 
was  irregularly  detain'd  in  prifon  in  one  thoufand  fix 
hundred  and  eighty-one,  being  by  Habeas  Corpus 
brought  to  the  bar  of  the  king's  bench,  where  he 
fued  to  be  releas'd  upon  bail ;  and  an  ignorant  judge 
telling  him  he  muft  apply  himfelf  to  the  king,  he 
replied,  that  he  came  thither  for  that  end ;  that  the 
king  might  eat,  drink,  or  fleep  where  he  pleafed,  but 
when  he  render 'djuftice  he  was  always  in  that  place. 
1  he  king  that  renders  juftice  is  indeed  always  there: 
he  never  fleeps ;  he  is  fubjc6t  to  no  infirmity ;  he 
never  dies  unlefs  the  nation  be  extinguifhed.  or  fo 
diffipated  as  to  have  no  government.  No  nation 
that  has  a  fovereign  power  within  itfelf,  does  ever 
want  this  king.     He  was  in  Athens  and  Pvome,  as 

2  .  well 


Sed.  42.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     35s 

well  as  at  Babylon  and  Sufa. ;  and  is  as  properly  faid 
to  be  now  in  Venice,  Switzerland,  or  Holland,  as  in 
France,  Morocco  or  Turky.  This  is  he  to  whom  we 
all  owe  a  fimple  and  unconditional  obedience.  This 
is  he  "  who  never  does  any  wrong:"  'tis  before  him 
we  appear,  when  we  demand  juftice,  or  render  an 
account  of  our  adlions.  All  juries  give  their  verdid: 
in  his  fight:  they  are  his  commands  that  the  judges 
are  bound  and  fworn  to  obey,  when  they  are  not  at 
all  to  confider  fuch  as  they  receive  from  the  perfon 
that  wears  the  crown*  'Twas  for  treafon  againft  him 
that  Trefilian  and  others  like  to  him  in  feveral  ages 
were  hanged.  They  gratified  the  luflis  of  the  vifi- 
ble  powers,  but  the  invifible  king  would  not  be 
mock'd.  He  caufed  jufi:ice  to  be  executed  upon 
Empfon  and  Dudley.  He  was  injured  when  the 
perjur'd  wretches  who  gave  that  accurfed  judgment 
in  the  cafe  of  fliip-money,  were  fuifered  to  efcape 
the  like  punifhment  by  means  of  the  enfuing 
troubles  which  they  had  chiefly  raifed.  And  I  leave 
it  to  thofe  who  are  concerned,  to  confider  how 
many  in  our  days  may  exped:  vengeance  for  the  like 
crimes. 

I  fliould  here  conclude  this  point,  if  the  power 
of  granting  a  "  Noli  profequi  celfet  proceffus,"  and 
pardons,  which  are  faid  to  be  annexed  to  the  perfon 
of  the  king,  were  not  taken  for  a  proof  that  all  pro- 
ceedings at  law  depend  upon  his  will.  But  whoever 
would  from  hence  draw  a  general  conclufion,  muft 
firft  prove  his  propofition  to  be  univerfally  true.  If 
it  be  wholly  falfe,  no  true  dedudion  can  be  made  ; 
and  if  it  be  true  only  in  fome  cafes,  'tis  abfurd  to 
drav/  from  thence  a  general  conclufion ;  and  to  eredt 
a  vaft  fabric  upon  a  narrow  foundation  is  impoflible. 
As  to  the  general  propofition  I  utterly  deny  it.  The 
king  cannot  flop  any  fuit  that  I  begin  in  my  own 

A  a  2  name, 


356  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

name,  or  invalidate  any  judgment  I  obtain  upon  it : 
he  cannot  releafe  a  debt  of  ten  iliillings  due  to  me, 
nor  a  fentence  for  the  Hke  fum  given  upon  an  adion 
of  battery,  affault.  trefpafs,  public  nuifance,  or  the 
like.  He  cannotpardon  a  man  condemned  upon  an 
appeal,  nor  hinder  the  perfon  injured  from  appealing. 
His  power  therefore  is  not  univerfal  :  if  it  be  not 
univerfal,  it  cannot  be  inherent,  but  conferred  upon 
him,  or  entrufted  by  a  fuperior  power  that  limits 

it. 

Thefe  limits  are  fixed  by  the  law,  the  law  there- 
fore is  above  him.     His  proceedings  muft  be  regu- 
lated by  the   law,  and   not  the   law  by  his  wilL 
Befides,    the   extent   of  thofe  limits   can  only  be 
knov/n  by  the  intention  of  the  law  that  fets  them  ; 
and  are  fo  vifible,  that  none  but  fuch  as  are  wilfully 
blind  can  miflake.     It  cannot  be  imagined  that  the 
law,  which  does  not  give  a  pov\er  to  the  king  of 
pardoning  a  man  that  breaks  my  hedge,  can  intend  he 
iliould  have  powxr  to  pardon  one  who  kills  my 
father,  breaks  my  houfe,  robs  me  of  my  goods,  abufes 
ip.y  children  and  fervants,  wounds  me,  and  brings 
me  in  danger  of  my  life.     Whatever  power  he  has 
in  fuch  cafes,  is  founded  upon  a  prefumption,  that 
he  who  has  {worn  not  to  deny  or  delay  juftice  to  any 
man,  will  not  break  his  oath  to  interrupt  it.     And 
farther,  as  he  does  nothing  but  what  he  may  rightly 
do,  ''  cum  magnatum  &  fapientum  confilio ;"  and 
that  'tis  fuppofed,  they  will  never  advife  him  to  do 
any  thing,  but  what  ought  to  be  done,  in  order  to 
attain  the  great  ends  of  the  law,  juftice,  and   the 
public  fafety ;  neverthelefs  left  this  fhould  not  be 
fufficient  to  keep  things  in  their  due  order,  or  that 
the  king  fhould  forget  his  oath,  not  to  delay  or  deny 
juftice  to  any  man>  his  counfellors  are  expofed  to  the 

2  fevereft 


Sea.  42.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      357 

feverefl  punifhments,  if  they  advife  him  to  do  any 
thing  contrary  to  it,  and  the  law  upon  which  it  is 
grounded.  So  that  the  utmofl:  advantage  the  king 
can  pretend  to  in  this  cafe,  is  no  more  than  that 
of  the  Norman,  who  faid  he  had  gained  his  caufe, 
becaufe  it  depended  upon  a  point  that  was  to  be  de- 
cided by  his  oath  ;  that  is  to  fay,  if  he  will  betray 
the  truft  repofed  in  him,  and  perjure  himfelf,  he 
may  fometimes  exempt  a  villain  from  the  punifh- 
ment  he  deferves,  and  take  the  guilt  upon  him  (elf. 
I  fay  fometimes^  for  appeals  may  be  brought  in  fome 
cafes,  and  the  waterman  who  had  been  pardoned 
by„his  majefly  in  the  year  one  thoufand  fix  hundred 
and  eighty,  for  a  murder  he  had  committed,  was 
condemned  and  hanged  at  the  ailizes  upon  an  appeal. 
Nay,  in  cafes  of  treafon,  which  fome  men  think 
relate  moft  particularly  to  the  perfon  of  the  king, 
he  cannot  always  do  it.  Gavefton,  the  two  Spencers, 
Trefilian,  Em.pfon,  Dudley,  and  others,  have  been 
executed  as  traitors  for  things  done  by  the  king's 
command  -,  and  'tis  not  doubted  they  would  have 
been  faved,  if  the  king's  power  had  extended  fo  far. 
I  might  add  the  cafes  of  the  earls  of  Strafford  and 
Danby ;  for  tho*  the  king  figned  a  warrant  for  the 
execution  of  the  firft,  no  man  doubts  he  would  have 
faved  him,  if  it  had  been  in  his  power.  The  other 
continues  in  prifon  notwithftanding  his  pardon  ;  and 
for  any  thing  I  knov/  he  may  continue  where  he  is, 
or  come  out  in  a  way  that  v/ill  not  be  to  his  fadsfac- 
tion,  unlefs  he  be  found  innocent,  or  fometning  fall 
out  more  to  his  advantage  than  his  majefty's  appro- 
bation of  what  he  has  done.  If  therefore  the  king 
cannot  interpofe  his  authority  to  hinder  the  courfe  of 
the  law  in  contefts  betVv^een  private  men,  nor  remit 
the  debts  adjudged  to  be  due,  or  the  damages  given 
to  the  perfons  aggrieved,  he  can  in  his  own  perfon  have 

A  a  3  no 


358  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

no  other  power  in  things  of  this  nature,    than  in 
•fome  degree  to  mitigate  the  vindi(5live  power  of  the 
law  ;  and  this  alfo  is  to  be  exercifed  no  other  way 
than  as  he  is  entrufted.     But  if  he  afts  even  in  this 
capacity  by  a  delegated  power,  and  in  few  cafes,  he 
muft  aft  according  to  the  ends  for  which  he  is  fo 
entrufted,  as  the  fame  law  fays,  '^  cum  magnatum 
^'  &  fapisntum  coniilio,"  and  is  not  therein  to  pur^ 
fae  his  own  will  and  interefts :  if  his  oath  farther 
oblige  him  not  to  do  it ;  and  his  minifters  are  liable 
to  punishment,  if  they  advife  him  otherwife  :  if  in 
matters  of  appeal  he  have  no  power  5  and  if  his 
pardons  have  been  of  no  value,  when  contrary  to 
his  oath  he  has  abufed  that  with  which  he  is  entrufted, 
to  the  patronizing  of  crimes,  and  exempting  fuch 
delinquents  from  puniihment,  as  could  not  be  par-* 
doned  without  prejudice  to  the  public,  I  may  juftly 
conclude,  that  the  king,  before  w^hom  every  man  is 
bound  to  appear,  who  does  perpetually  and  imparti-. 
ally  diftribute  juftice  to  the  nation,  is  not  the  man 
or  wom.an  that  wears  the  crown  -,  and  that  he  or  flie 
cannot  determine  thofe  matters,  which  by  the  law 
are  referred  to  the  king.     Whether  therefore  fuch 
matters  are  ordinary  or  extraordinary,  the  decifion  is 
and  ought  to  be  placed  where  there  is  moft  wifdom 
and  ftability,  and  vv' here  paffion  and  private  intereft 
does  Icafl:  prevail  to  the  obftrucStion  of  juftice.     This 
is  the  only  way  to  obviate  that  confuiion  and   mif- 
chief,  which  our  author  thinks  it  would  introduce; 
In  cafes  of  the  firft  fort,  this  is  done  in  England  by 
iudges  and  juries  :  in  the  other  by  the  parliament, 
which  being  the  reprefentative  body  of  the  people, 
and  the  colleded    wifdom  of  the  nation,    is  leaft 
fubjed:  to  error,  moft  exempted  from  paffion,  and 
nioft  free  from  corruption,  their   ovm  good  both 

public 


Sta.  43.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      359 

public  and  private  depending  upon  the  redlitude  of 
their  fandions.  They  cannot  do  any  thing  that  is 
ill  without  damage  to  themfelves  and  their  pofteri- 
ty  ;  which  being  all  that  can  be  done  by  human  un- 
derflanding,  our  lives,  liberties  and  properties  are 
by  our  laws  directed  to  depend  upon  them. 

SECT.      XLIII. 

Proclamations  are  not  laws. 

OUR  author,  according  to  his  ufual  method  and 
integrity,  lays  great  weight  upon  proclama- 
tions, as  the  fignifications  of  the  king's  pleafure, 
which  in  his  opinion  is  our  only  law.  But  neither 
law  nor  reafon  openly  directing,  nor  by  confequences 
infinuating  that  fuch  a  power  ihould  be  put  into  an 
uncertain  or  fufpedied  hand,  we  may  fafely  deny 
them  to  be  laws,  or  in  any  fenfe  to  have  the  effcdl  of 
laws  Nay,  they  cannot  be  fo  much  as  fignifica- 
tions of  his  will ;  for  as  he  is  king,  he  can  have  no 
will  but  as  the  law  direds  It  he  depart  from  the 
law,  he  is  no  longer  '  ;ing,  and  his  will  is  nothing  to 
us.  Proclamations,  at  mod,  are  but  temporary,  by 
the  advice  of  council,  in  purfuance  of  the  law  If 
they  be  not  fo,  the  fubiect  is  no  way  obliged  to 
obey  them,  and  the  counfellors  are  to  be  punidicd 
for  them.  Thefe  laws  are  either  immemorial  cuf- 
toms,  or  (latutes.  The  firft  have  their  beginning 
and  continuance  from  the  univerfai  confent  of  the 
nation.  The  latter  receive  their  authoritv  and  force 
of  laws  from  parliaments,  as  is  frequently  expreffed 
in  the  preambles.  Thefe  are  under  God  the  heft 
defence  of  our  lives,  liberties,  and  eftates  :  they  pro- 
ceed not  from  the  blind,  corrupt,  and  fluctuating 
humour  of  a  man,  but  from  the  mature  deliberation 
of  the  chciceft  perfons  of  the  nation,  and  fuch  as 

A  a  4  have 


360  DISCOURSES        Chap.  111. 

have  the  greateft  intereH:  in  it.     Our  anceftors  have 
always  relied  upon  thefe  laws  ;  and  'tis  to  be  hoped 
we  ihall  not  be  fo  abandoned  by  God,  fo  deprived 
of  courage  and  common  fenfe,  to  fuffer  ourfelves  to 
be  cheated  of  the  inheritance  which  they  have  fo  fre- 
quently, fo  bravely,  and  fo  conflantly  defended.  Tho* 
experience  has  too  well  taught  us,  that  parliaments 
may  have  their  failings,  and  that  the  vices,  which 
are  induftrioufly  fpread  amongft  them,  may  be  too 
prevalent  -,  yet  they  are  the  beft  helps  we  have,  and 
we  m.ay  much  more  reafonably  depend  upon  them, 
than  upon  thofe   who    propagate   that  corruption 
among  them  for  which'  only  they  can  deferve  to  be 
fufpeded.  \¥e  hope  they  will  take  care  of  our  con- 
cernments, fince  they  are  as  other  men  fo  foon  as  a 
feffion  is  ended,  and  can  do  nothing  to  our  prejudice 
that  will  not  equally  affecfl  them  and  their  pofterity;- 
befides  the  guilt  of  betraying  their  country,  which 
can  never  be  waflied  off.  If  fome  fhould  prove  falfe 
to  their  truft,  'tis  probable  that  others  would  con- 
tinue in  their  integrity  :  Or  if  the  bafe  arts,   which 
are  ufually  prafiifed  by  thofe  who  endeavour  to  de- 
lude, corrupt,  enflave  and  ruin  nations,  fhould  hap- 
pen to  prevail  upon  the  youngeft  and   weakeft,  it 
may  be  reafonably  hoped,  that  the  wifeft  will  fee 
the  fnares,  and  inftrudt  their  companions  to  avoid 
them.  But  if  all  things  were  fo  put  into  the  hands  of 
one  man,  that  his  proclamations  v/ere  to  be  elleemed 
laws,  the  nation  would  be  expofed  to  ruin,  as  foon 
as  it  fljould  chance  to  fall  into  an  ill  hand.    'Tis  in- 
vain  to  fay  wx  have  a  good  king,  who  will  not  make 
an  ill  ufe  of  his  power ;  for  even  the  beft  are  fub- 
je6l  to  be  deceived  by  flatterers,  and  crowned  heads 
are  almoft  ever  encompaffed  by  them.  The  princi- 
pal art  of  a  courtier  is  to  obferve  his  mafter's  paffions, 
and  to  attack  him  on  that  fide  where  he  feem.s  to  be 

moft 


Seft.  43-  CONCERNING    GOVERNMENT.    361 
nioft  weak.     It  would  be  a  ftrange  thing  to  find  a 
man  impregnable  in  every  part ,  and  if  he  be  not, 
'tis  impoffible  he  fliould  reiid  all  the  attempts  that 
are  made  upon  him.     If  his  judgment  come  to  be 
prepalTeffed,  he  and  all  that  depend  on  him  are  loft. 
Contradidlions,  tho*  never  fo  juft,  are  then  unfafe, 
and  no  man  will  venture  upon  them,  but  he  who 
dares  facrifice  himfelf  for  the  public  good.      The 
nature  oi  mian  is  frail,  and  ftands  in  need  of  affift- 
ance.      Virtuous    adlions   that  are  profitable  to  a 
commomvealthj  ought  to  be  made,  as  far  as  it  is 
pofiibie,  fafe,  eafy,  and  advantageous :  and  'tis  the 
utmoft  imprudence  to  tempt  men  to  be  enemies  to 
the  public,  by  making  the  moft  pernicious  acTtions 
to  be  the  means  of  obtaining  honour  and  favour, 
whilft  no  man  can  ferve  his  country,  but  with  the 
ruin  of  himfelf  and  his  family. 

However  in  this  cafe  the  queftion  is  not  concern- 
ing a  perfon :  the  fam.e  counfels  are  to  be  folio  A^ed 
when  Mofes  or  Samuel  is  in  the  throne,  as  if  Cali- 
gula had  invaded  it.     Laws  ought  to  aim  at  perpe- 
tuity, but  the  virtues  of  a  man  die  with  him,  and 
very  often  before  him.     Thofe  w^ho  have  deferved 
the  higheft  praifes  for  wifdom  and  integrity,  have 
frequently  left  the  honours  they  enjoyed  to  foolifh-v 
and  vicious  children.     If  virtue  m.ay  in  any  refpedl 
be  faid  to  outlive  the  perfon,  it  can  only  be  when 
good  men  fram.e  fuch  laws  and  conftitutions  as  by 
favouring  it  preferve  themfelves.     This  has  never 
been  done  otherwife,  than  by  balancing  the  powers 
in  fuch  a  manner,  that  the  corruption  which  one  or 
a  few  men  might  fall  into,  f!:iould  not  be  fuffered  to 
fpread  the  contagion  to  the  ruin  of  the  whole.  The 
long  continuance  of  Lycurgus  his  laws  is  to  be  at- 
tributed to  this :  they  reftrained  the  lufiis  of  kings, 
and  reduced  thofe  to-order  who  adventured  to  tranf- 

grefs 


352  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III.' 

grefs  them :    whereas  the  vv  hole  fabric  muft  have 
fallen  to  the  ground  in  a  ihort  time,  if  the  firft  that 
had  a  fancy  to  be  abfolute,  had  been  able  to  efted: 
his  defign.     This  has  been  the  fate  of  all  govern- 
ments that  were  made  to  depend  upon  the  virtue  of 
a  man,  which  never  continues  long  in  any  family, 
and  when  that  fails  all  is  lo  t.     The  nations  there- 
fore that  are  fo  happy  to  have  good  kings,  ought  to 
make  a  right  ufe  of  them,  by  eftabliihing  the  good 
that  may  outlaft  their  lives.     Thofe  of  them   that 
are  good,  will  readily  join  in  this  work,  and  take 
care  that  their  fucceffors  may  be  obliged  in  doing 
the  like,  to  be  equally  beneficial  to  their  own  fami- 
lies, and  the  people  they  govern.     If  the  rulers  of 
nations  be  reftrained,  not  only  the  people  is  by  that 
means  fecured  from  the  mifchiefs  of  their  vices  and 
follies,  but  they  themfeives  are  preferv  d  from  the 
greateft  temptations  to  ill,  and  the  terrible  effeds  of 
the  vengeance  that  frequently  enfues  upon  it.     An 
unlimited  prince  might  be  juilly  compared  to  a  weak 
fhip  expofed  to  a  violent  ftorm,  with  a  vaft  fail  and 
no  rudder.     We  have  an  eminent  example  of  this 
in  the  book  of  "^  Either.     A  wicked  villain  havine 
filled  the  ears  of  a  foolifh  king  with  falfe  flories  of 
the  Jews,  he  iffues  out  a  proclamation  for  their  ut- 
ter extirpation  ;  and  not  long  after  being  informed  of 
the  truth,  he  gave  them  leave  by  another  procla- 
mation to  kill  whom  they  pleafed,  which  they  ex- 
ecuted  upon  feventy  thoufand  men.     The  books  of 
Ezra,    Nehemiah  and  Daniel,  m.anifeflly   difcover 
the  like  fludluation  in  all  the  courJels  of  Nabucho- 
donofor,  Cyrus,    Darius,    and  Artaxerxes.     When 
good  men  had  credit  with  them,  they  favoured  the 
Ifraelites ;  fent  them   back  to  their  own   country  . 
reftored  the  facred  veffels  that  had  been  taken  away  . 

*  Chap,  iii, 


gave 


Sea.  43.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    363 

gave  them  all  things  neceffary  for  the  rebuilding  of 
the  city,  and  advanced  the  chief  of  them  to  the 
higheft  employments.  But  if  they  fell  into  ill  hands, 
three  juft  men  muft  be  thrown  into  the  burning 
furnace  for  refufing  to  v^oriliip  an  idol  ^  Daniel  muit 
becaft  to  the  lions ^  the  holy  city  efteemed  rebellious, 
and  thofe  who  endeavour  to  rebuild  it,  enemies  to 
kings.     Such  was  the  ftate  of  things,  when  their 
proclamations  palTed  for  laws,  and  numbers  of  flat- 
tering flaves  were  ready  to  execute  their  commands, 
without  examining  whether  they  were  juft  or  unjuft, 
good  or  bad.     The  life  and  death  of  the  beft  men, 
together  with  the  very  being  of  nations,  was  expof- 
ed  to  chance,  and  they  were  either  preferved  or  de- 
ftroyed  according  to  the  humour  of  that  man  who 
fpoke  laft  to  the  king,  or  happened  to  have  credit 
with  him.     If  a  frantic  fancy  come  into  the  head  of 
a  drunken  whore,    Perfepolis  muft  be  burnt,  and 
the  hand  of  Alexander  is  ready  to  execute  her  will. 
If  a  dancing  wench  pleafe  Herod,  the  moft  venerable 
of  all  human  heads  muft  be  offered  in  a  diili  for  a  fa- 
crifice  to  the  rage  of  her  im^pure  mother.  The  nature 
of  man  is  fo  frail,  that  wherefoever  the  word  of  a 
fingle  perfon  has  had  the  force  of  a  law,  the  innume- 
rable extravagances  and  milchiefsit  has  produced  have 
been  fo  notorious,  that  all  nations  v/ho  are  not  ftupid, 
flavifli  and  brutilh,  have  always  abominated  it,  and 
made  it   their  principal  care  to  find  out  remedies 
againft  it,  by  fo  dividing  and  balancing  the  powers 
of  their  government,  that  one  or  a  few  men  might 
not  be  able  to  opprefs  and  deftroy  thofe  they  ought 
to  preferve   and  protedl.    This  has  always   been  as 
grateful  to  the    beft  and  wifeft   princes,  as  necef- 
fary to  the  weakeft  and  w^orft,  as  I  have  proved  al- 
ready by  the  exam.ples  of  Theopompus,  Mofes,  and 
rnany  others*     Thefe  confiderations  have  given  be- 
ginning. 


3^4  D  I  S  C  OU  R  S  E  S        Chap.  III. 

ginning,  growth  and  continuance  to  all  the  mixed 
governments  that  have  been  in  the  world;  and  I  may 
juftly  fay  there  never  was  a  good  one  that  was  not 
mixed .  If  other  proofs  of  their  rectitude  were  want- 
ing, our  author's  hatred  would  be  enough  to  juftify 
them.  He  is  fo  bitter  an  enemy  to  mankind,  as 
to  be  difpleafed  with  nothing  but  that  which  tends  to 
their  good,  and  fo  perverfe  in  his  judgment,  that  we  have 
reafon  to  believe  that  to  be  good  which  he  mofl  abhors. 
One  would  think  he  had  taken  the  model  of 
the  government  he  propofes,  from  the  monftrous 
tyranny  of  Ceylon,  an  ifland  in  the  Eaft  Indies,  where 
the  king  knows  no  other  law  than  his  own  will. 
He  kills,  tears  in  pieces,  empales,  or  throvv^s  to 
his  elephants  whomfoever  he  pleafes :  no  man  has 
any  thing  that  he  can  call  his  own  :  he  feldom  fails 
to  deftroy  thofe  who  have  been  employed  in  his 
domeftic  fervice,  or  public  offices;  and  few  obtain 
the  favour  of  being  put  to  death  and  thrown  to  the 
dogs  without  torments.  His  fubjeds  approach  him 
no  otherwife,  than  on  their  knees,  licking  the  duft, 
and  dare  affume  to  themfelves  no  other  name  than 
that  of  dogs,  or  limbs  of  dogs.  This  is  a  true 
pattern  of  Filmer's  Patriarchical  Monarch.  His 
majefty,  as  I  fuppofe,  is  fufficiently  exalted  3  for  he 
does  whatever  he  pleafes.  The  exercife  of  his 
power  is  as  gentle  as  can  reafonably  be  expelled  from 
one  who  has  all  by  the  unqueftionable  right  of 
ufurpation ;  and  knows  the  people  will  no  longer 
fuffer  him,  and  the  villains  he  hires  to  be  the  inftru- 
ments  of  his  cruelty,  than  they  can  be  kept  in  fuch 
ignorance,  weaknefs  and  bafenefs,  as  neither  to  know 
how  to  provide  for  themfelves,  or  dare  torefift  him. 
We  ought  to  efteem  ourfelves  happy,  if  the  like 
could  be  eflabliflied  among  us;  and  are  much 
obliged  to  our  author  for  fo  kindly  propofmg  an  ex- 
pedient 


Sea.  43.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      365 

pedient  that  might  terminate  all  our  difputes.  Let 
proclamations  obtain  the  power  of  laws,  and  the 
bufinefs  is  done.  They  may  be  fo  ingenioufly  con- 
trived, that  the  antient  laws,  which  we  and  our 
fathers  have  highly  valued,  fliall  be  aboliflied,  or 
made  a  fnare  to  all  thofe  that  dare  remember  they  are 
Engliflimen,  and  are  guilty  of  the  unpardonable 
crime  of  loving  their  country,  or  have  the  courage, 
condudt  and  reputation  required  to  defend  it.  This 
is  the  fum  of  Filmer's  philofophy,  and  this  is  the 
legacy  he  has  left  to  teftify  his  affedlion  to  the  nation  ; 
which  having  for  a  long  time  lain  unregarded,  has 
been  lately  brought  into  the  light  again,  as  an  intro- 
dudtion  of  a  popifli  fucceffor,  who  is  to  be  efla- 
bliflied,  as  we  ought  to  believe,  for  the  fecurity  of 
the  proteftant  religion,  and  our  Engliili  liberties. 
Both  will  undoubtedly  flourifh  under  a  prince  who 
is  made  to  believe  the  kingdom  is  his  patrimony  ^ 
that  his  will  is  a  law,  and  that  he  has  a  power 
which  none  may  refift.  If  any  man  doubt  whether 
he  will  make  a  good  ufe  of  It,  he  may  only  examine 
the  hiftories  of  what  others  in  the  fame  circum- 
ftances  have  done  in  all  places  w^here  they  have  had 
power.  The  principles  of  that  religion  are  fo  full  of 
meeknefs  and  charity;  the  Popes  have  always  fhew'd 
themfelves  fo  gentle  towards  thofe  who  would  not 
fubmit  to  their  authority ;  the  Jefuits  who  may  be 
accounted  the  foul  that  gives  Hfe  to  the  whole  body 
of  that  fadion,  are  fo  well  natur'd,  faithful  and 
exa(fl  in  their  morals ;  fo  full  of  innocence,  juftice 
and  truth,  that  no  violence  is  to  be  fear'd  from  fuch 
as  are  govern  d  by  them.  The  fatherly  care  Cne\w'd 
to  the  Proteftants  of  France,  by  the  five  laft  kings  of 
the  houfe  of  Valois;  the  mercy  of  Philip  the 
fecond  of  Spain  to  his  pagan  fubjeds  in  the  Weft- 
Indies, 


^66  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

Indies,  and  the  more  hated  proteftants  in  the  Nether- 
lands; the  moderation  of  the  dukes  of  Savoy  towards 
the  Vaudois  in  the  marquifate  of  Saluzzo  and  the  vallies 
of  Piedmont  -,  the  gentlenefs  and  faith  of  the  tvva 
Maries  queens  of  England  and  Scotland;  the  kindnefs 
of  the  Papifts  to  the  Proteftants  of  Ireland  in  the 
year  1 64 1 ;  with  what  we   have  reafon  to   believe 
they  did  and  do  Hill  intend,  if  they  can  accomplifli 
the  ends  of  their  confpiracy;  in  a  word,  the  fweet- 
nefs  and  apoflolicalmeeknefsof  tbeinquifition,  may 
fufficiently  convince  us  that  nothing  is  to  be  feared 
where  that  principle  reigns.     We  may  fuiFer  the 
word  of  fuch  a  prince  to  be  a  law,  and  the  people  to 
be  made  to  believe  it  ought  to  be  fo,  when  he  is 
expeded.    Tho*  we  fhould  wave  the  bill  of  exclulion, 
and  not  only  admit  him  to  reign  as  other  kings  have 
done,  but  reiign  the  whole  power  into  his  hands,  it 
would  neither  bring  inconvenience  or  danger  on  the 
prefent  king.      He  can  with  patience  expedl  that 
nature  fhould  take  her  courfe,  and  would  neither 
anticipate  nor  fecure  his  entrance  into  the  poffeflion 
of  the  power,  by  taking  one  day  from  the  life  of  his 
brother.   Tho'  the  Papifts  know  that  like  a  true  fon, 
of  their  church,  he  would  prefer  the  advancement  of 
their  religion  before  all  other  confiderations;  and  that 
one  ftab  with  a  dagger,  or  a  dofe  of  poifon,  w^ould 
put  all  under  his  feet,  not  one  man  would  be  found 
among  them  to  give  it.     The  affaflins  were  Maho- 
metans,   not  pupils  of  the  honeft  Jefuits,  nor  ever 
employed  by  them.     Thefe  things  being  certain,  all 
our  concernments  would  be  fecure,  if  inftead  of  the 
foolifh  ftatutes  and  antiquated  cuftoms,  on  which 
our  anceftors  and  we  have  hitherto  doted,  we  may 
be  troubled  with  no  law  but  the  kings  will,  and  a 
proclamation  may  be  taken  for  a  fuiiicient  declaration 

of 


Seft.  43.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      3^7 

of  it.     We  {hall  by  this  means  be  delivered  from 
that  *•    Liberty  with    a  mifchief,"  in  which  our 
miflaken  nation  feems  fo  much  to  delight.      This 
phrafe  is  fo  new,    and  fo  peculiar  to  our  author, 
that  it  deferves  to  be  written  upon  his  tomb.     We 
have  heard  of  *'  tyranny  with  a  mifchief,  flavery  and 
"  bondage  with  a   mifchief 5'*  and    they  have  been 
denounced  by  God  againfl:  wicked  and  perverfe  na- 
tions, as  mifchiefs  comprehending  all  that  is  moft 
to  be  abhorr'd  and  dreaded  in  the  world.    But  Filmer 
informs  us  that  liberty,  which  all  wife  and  good 
men  have  in  all  ages  efleemed  to  be  the  moft  va- 
luable and  glorious  privilege  of  mankind,  is   a  mif- 
chief.   Ifhedeferve  credit,  Mofes,  Jofhua,  Gideon, 
Samfon,    and    Samuel,    with   others    like     them, 
were  enemies  to  their  country,   in   depriving  the 
people  of  the  advantages  they  enjoy'd  under  the 
paternal  care  of  Pharaoh,  Adonibezek,  Eglon,  Jabin, 
and  other  kings  of  the  neighbouring  nations,    and 
reftoring  them  to  that  ''    liberty  with  a  mifchief' 
which  he  had  promifed  to  them.     The   Ifraelites 
were  happy  under  the   power  of  tyrants,    whofe 
proclamations    were    laws ;    and    they   ought    to 
have  been  thankful  to  God  for  that  condition,  and 
not  for  the  deliverances  he  wrought  by  the  hands  of 
his  fervants.      Subjed'ion  to  the  will  of  a  man  is 
happinefs,    liberty  is  a  mifchief.      But  this   is  fo 
abominably  wicked  and  deteftable,  that  it  can  deferve 
no  anfwer, 


SECT. 


368  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

SECT.     XLIV. 

iVb  people  that  is  not  free  can  Juhflitute  delegates, 

O  W  full  foever  the  power  of  any  perfon  of 
people  may  be,  he  or  they  are  obliged  to  give 
only  fo  much  to  their  delegates,  as  feems  convenient 
to  themfelves,  or  conducing  to  the  ends  they  defire 
to  attain  3  but  the  delegate  can  have  none  except 
what  is  conferred  upon  him  by  his  principal.  If 
,  therefore  the  knights,  citizens  and  burgefles  fent  by 
the  people  of  England  to  ferve  in  parliament  have  a 
pov/er,  it  muft  be  more  perfedly  and  fully  in  thofe 
that  fend  them.  But  (as  w^as proved  inthelaft  fecSion) 
proclamations,  and  other  fignifications  of  the  king's 
pleafure,  are  not  laws  to  us.  They  are  to  be  regu- 
lated by  the  law,  not  the  law  by  them.  They  are 
to  be  confidered  only  fo  far  as  they  are  conformable  to 
the  law  from  which  they  receive  all  the  ftrength  that 
is  in  them,  and  can  confer  none  upon  it.  We  know 
no  laws  but  our  own  ftatutes,  and  thofe  immemorial 
cuftoms  eftablifhed  by  the  confent  of  the  nation ; 
which  may  be,  and  often  are  changed  by  us.  The 
legiflative  power  therefore  that  is  exercifed  by  the 
parliament,  cannot  be  conferred  by  the  writ  of 
fummons,  but  muft  be  effentially  and  radically  in  the 
people,  from  whom  their  delegates  and  reprefenta- 
tives  have  all  that  they  have.  But,  fays  our  author. 
They  muft  only  choofe,  and  truft  thofe  whom 
they  choofe,  to  do  what  they  lift ;  and  that  is  as 
much  liberty  as  many  of  us  deferve  for  our  irregu- 
lar ele6lions  of  BurgefTes."  This  is  ingenioufly 
concluded  :  I  take  what  fervant  I  pleafe,  and  when 
I  have  taken  him  I  muft  fuffer  him  to  do  what  he 
pleafes.  But  from  whence  fliould  this  neceffity, 
arife  ?  Why  m.ay  not  I  take  one  to  be  my  groom, 

another 


cc 

(C 

cc 


Sea.  44.  Concerning  government.    sCg 

another  to  be  my  cook,  and  keep  them  both  to  the 
offices  for  which  I  took  them  ?  What  law  does  herein 
reftrain  my  right  ?  And  if  I  am  free  in  my  private 
capacity  to  regulate  my  particular  affairs  according  to 
my  own  difcretion,  and  to  allot  to  each  fervant  his 
proper  work,  why  have  not  I  with  my  affociates 
the  freemen  of  England  the  like  liberty  of  directing 
and  limiting  the  powers  of  the  fervants  Vv^e  employ 
in  our  public  affairs  ?  Our  author  gives  us  reafons 
proportionable  to  his  judgment:  "  This  were  Hberty 
"  v/ith  a  mifchief ;  and  that  of  choofing  only  is  as 
'^  much  as  many  of  us  deferve."  I  have  already 
proved,  that  as  far  as  our  hiftories  reach,  we  have 
had  no  princes  or  magiilrates,  but  fuch  as  we  have 
made,  and  they  have  had  no  other  power  than  what 
we  have  conferred  upon  them.  They  cannot  be  the 
judges  of  our  merit,  who  have  no  power  but  what  we 
gave  them,  thro'  an  opinion  they  did  or  might  deferve 
it.  They  may  diftribute  in  parcels  to  particulars 
that  vv^ith  which  th.ey  are  entrufted  in  the  grofs. 
But  'tis  impoffible  that  the  public  (hould  depend  ab- 
folutely  upon  thofe  who  are  nothing  above  other 
men,  except  w^hat  they  are  made  to  be,  for,  and 
by  the  public.  The  reftridlions  therefore  of  the 
people's  liberty  muil  be  from  themfelves,  or  there 
can  be  none. 

Neverthelefs  I  believe,  that  the  pov/ers  of  everv 
county,  city  and  borough  of  England,  are  regulated 
by  the  general  lav/  to  which  they  have  all  confented, 
and  by  which  they  are  all  made  members  of  or^e 
political  body.  This  obliges  them  to  proceed  with 
their  delegates  in  a  manner  different  from  that  v/hich 
is  ufed  in  the  United  Netherlands,  or  in  Switzerland, 
Amongft  thefe  every  province,  city  or  canton  mak- 
ing a  diftindt  body  independeiTt  from  any  other,  and 
exerciiing  the  fovereign  power  within  itfelf^  looiis 

Vol.  II.  B  b  upon 


370  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

upon  the  reft  as  allies,  to  whom  they  are  bound 
only  by  fuch  afts  as  they  themfelves  have  made ; 
and  when  any  new  thing  not  comprehended  in  them 
happens  to  arife,  thev  oblige  their  delegates  to  give 
them  an  account  of  it,  and  retain  the  power  of  de- 
termining thofe  matters  in  themfelves.  'Tis  not  fo 
amongft  us :  Every  county  does  not  make  a  diftindl 
body,  having  in  itfelf  a  fovereign  power,  but  is  a 
member  of  that  great  body  which  comprehends  tlie 
whole  nation.  'Tis  not  therefore  for  Kent  or  Suflex, 
Lewis  or  Maidftone,  but  for  the  whole  nation,  that 
the  members  chofen  in  thofe  places  are  fent  to  ferve 
in  parliament :  and  tho'  it  be  fit  for  them  as  friends 
and  neighbours  (fo  far  as  may  be)  to  hearken  to  the 
opinions  of  the  eIed:ors  for  the  information  of  their 
judgments,  and  to  the  end  that  what  they  fhall  fay 
may  be  of  more  weight,  when  every  one  is  known 
not  to  fpeak  his  own  thoughts  only,  but  thofe  of  a 
great  number  of  men  -,  yet  they  are  not  ftrictly  and 
properly  obliged  to  give  account  of  their  a6tions  to 
any,  unlefs  the  whole  body  of  the  nation  for  which 
they  ferve,  and  vv'^ho  are  equally  concerned  in  their 
refolutions,  could  be  aifembled.  This  being  im- 
practicable, the  only  punifhment  to  which  they  are 
fubje(^  if  they  betray  their  trud,  is  fcorn,  infamy, 
hatred,  and  an  affurance  of  being  rejected,  when 
they  {[rail  again  feek  the  fame  honour.  And  tho' 
this  mav  feem  a  fmall  matter  to  thofe  who  fear  to 
do  ill  only  from  a  fenfe  of  the  pains  inflidled ;  yet 
it  is  very  terrible  to  men  of  ingenuous  fpirits,  as 
they  are  fuppofed  to  be  who  are  accounted  fit  to  be 
entruiled  with  fo  great  powers.  But  why  ihould 
this  be  *'  Liberty  with  a  mifchief,  "  if  it  were  other- 
wife  ?  or  how  the  liberty  of  particular  focieties  would 
be  greater,  if  they  might  do  what  they  pleafed,  than 
whilft  they  .fend  others  to  ad:  for  them,  fuch  wife 

mea 


Sea.  44.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.    371 

men  only  as  Filmer  can  tell  us.  For  as  no  man,  o^ 
number  of  men,  can  give  a  power  which  he  or  they 
have  not,  the  Achaians,  i^tolians,  Latins,  Samnites 
and  Tufcans,  who  tranfadled  all  things  relating  to 
their  aflbciations  by  delegates  -,  and  the  Athenians, 
Carthaginians  and  Romans,  who  kept  the  power  of 
the  flate  in  themfelves,  w^ere  all  equally  free.  And 
in  our  days,  the  united  provinces  of  the  Nr^.ther- 
lands,  the  Switzers  and  Grifons,  who  are  of  the  firft 
fort  ,and  the  Venetians,  Genoefes,  Lucchefes,  who 
are  of  the  other,  are  fo  alfo.  All  men  that  have  any 
degree  of  common  fenfe,  plainly  fee,  that  the  liberty 
of  thofe  who  a6l  in  their  own  perfons,  and  of  thofe 
who  fend  delegates,  is  perfedlly  the  fame,  and  the 
exercife  is^  andean  only  be  changed  by  their  con- 
fent. 

But  whatever  the  law  or  cuftom  of  England  be  in 
this  point,  it  cannot  concern  our  queflion.  The 
general  propofition  concerning  a  patriarchical  powxr 
cannot  be  proved  by  a  fingle  example.  If  there  be 
a  general  power  every  where,  forbidding  nations  to 
give  inftrudiions  to  their  delegates,  they  can  do  it  no 
where.  If  there  be  no  fuch  thing,  every  people 
may  do  it,  unlefs  they  have  deprived  themfelves  of 
their  right,  all  being  born  under  the  fame  condition- 
'Tis  to  no  purpofe  to  fay  that  the  nations  before 
mentioned  had  not  kings^  and  therefore  might  adl  as 
they  did.  For  if  the  genetal  thefis  be  true,  they 
muft  have  kings ;  and  if  it  be  not,  none  are  obliged 
to  have  them,  unlefs  they  think  fit,  and  the  kings 
they  make  are  their  creatures.  But  many  of  thefe 
nations  had  either  kings,or  other  magiftrates  in  power 
like  to  them.  The  provinces  of  the  Netherlands  had 
dukes,  earls,  or  marqueffes :  Genoa  and  Venice  have 
dukes.  If  any  on  account  of  the  narrowncfs  of  their 
territories  have  abllained  from  the  name,  it  does  not 

B  b  2  alter 


372  DISCOURSES        Chap.  IIL 

alter  the  cafe ;  for  our  difpute  is  not  concerning  the 
name,  but  the  right.  If  that  one  man,  who  is  in 
the  principal  magiftracy  of  every  nation,  muft  be 
reputed  the  father  of  that  people,  and  has  a  power 
which  may  not  be  limited  by  any  law,  it  imports 
not  what  he  is  called.  Bat  if  in  fmall  territories  he 
may  be  limited  by  laws,  he  may  be  fo  alfo  in  the 
greatefl:.  The  leaft  of  men  is  a  man  as  well  as  a  giant: 
and  thofe  in  the  Weft-Indies  w^ho  have  not  above 
twenty  or  thirty  fubjedls  able  to  bear  arms,  are  kings  as 
well  as  Xerxes.  Every  nation  may  divide  itfelf  into 
fmall  parcels  as  fome  have  done,  by  the  fame  law  they 
have  reftrained  or  aboiiflied  their  kings,  joined  to 
one  another,  or  taken  their  hazard  of  fubiifting  by 
themfelves  -,  afted  by  delegation,  or  reftraining  the 
power  in  their  own  perfons ;  given  finite  or  in- 
definite powers  'j  referved  to  themfelves  a  power  of 
punching  thofe  who  ihould  depart  from  their  duty, 
or  referred  it  to  their  general  affemblies.  And  that 
liberty,  for  which  we  contend  as  the  gift  of  God 
and  nature,  remains  equally  to  them  all. 

If  men  who  delight  in  cavilling  fliould  fay,  that 
great  kingdoms  are  not  to  be  regulated  by  the  ex- 
amples of  fmall  ftates,  I  defire  to  know  when  it  was, 
that  God  ordained  great  nations  iliould  be  flaves, 
and  deprived  of  all  right  to  difpofe  matters  relating 
to  their  government  -,  Vvdiilft  he  left  to  fuch  as  had, 
or  fhould  divide  themfelves  into  fmall  parcels,  a 
right  of  making  fuch  conftitutions  as  were  moft 
convenient  for  them.  When  this  is  refolved,  we 
ought  to  be  informed,  what  extent  of  territory 
is  required  to  deferve  the  name  of  a  great  king- 
dom. Spain  and  France  are  efteemed  great,  and 
yet  the  deputies  or  procuradores  of  the  feveral 
f>arts  of  Caftille  did  in  the  cortez  held  at  Ma- 
drid,   in   the    beginning;  of  *  Charles    the    fifth's 

*  Vida  de  Carlos  5°  de  Sandoval. 


Sea.  44-.    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     373 

reign,  excule  themfelves  from  giving  the  fupplies  he 
deiired,  becaufe  they  had  received  no  orders  in  that 
particular  from  the  towns  that  fent  them  ;  and  after- 
wards receiving  exprefs  orders  not  to  do  it,  tliey  gave 
his  majefty  a  flat  deniah  The  Hke  was  frequently 
done  during  the  reigns  of  that  great  prince,  and  of 
his  fon  Philip  the  fecond.  And  generally  thofe  pro- 
curadores  never  granted  any  thing  of  importance  to 
either  of  them,  without  particular  orders  from  their 
principals.  The  fame  way  was  taken  in  France,  as  long 
as  there  were  any  general  affemblies  of  eftates;  and  if 
it  do  not  ftill  continue,  'tis  becaufe  there  are  none. 
For  no  man  who  underftood  the  affairs  of  that  king- 
dom, did  ever  deny,  that  the  deputies  were  obliged 
to  follow  the  orders  of  thofe  who  fent  them.  And 
perhaps,  if  men  would  examine  by  what  means 
they  came  to  be  aboliflied,  they  might  find,  that 
the  cardinals  de  Richheu  and  Mazarine,  with  other 
minifters  who  have  accomplifhed  that  work,  were 
actuated  by  fome  other  principle  than  that  of  juftice, 
or  the  eflablifhment  of  the  laws  of  God  and  nature. 
In  the  general  aifembly  of  eftates  held  at  Blois  in  the 
time  of  Henry  the  third,  *  Bodin  then  deputy  for 
the  third  ellate  of  Vermandois,  by  their  particular 
order,  propofed  fo  many  things  as  took  up  a  great 
part  of  their  time.  Other  deputies  alledged  no  other 
reafon  for  many  things  faid  and  done  by  them,  high- 
ly contrary  to  the  king's  will,  than  that  they  were 
commanded  fo  to  do  by  their  fupeiiors.  Thefe  ge- 
neral affemblies  being  laid  afide,  the  fame  cuflom  is 
ftill  ufed  in  the  lelfer  affemblies  of  eflates  in  Langue- 
doc  and  Britany.  The  deputies  cannot  without  the 
infamy  of  betraying  their  trufl,  and  fear  of  punifh- 
ment,  recede  from  the  orders  given  by  their  princi- 
pals 3  and  yet  we  do  not  find  that  '^  liberty  with  a 

*  Hift.  Thuan. 

B  b  3  ''  mifchief* 


374  DISCOURSES        Chap.  Ill, 

*^  mifchicf "  is  much  more  predominant  in  France 
than  amongft  us.  The  fame  method  is  every  day 
pra(!!tifed  in  the  diets  of  Germany.  The  princes  and 
great  lords,  who  have  their  places  in  their  own  right, 
may  do  what  they  pleafe ;  but  the  deputies  of  the 
cities  muft  follow  fuch  orders  a&  they  receive.  The 
hiftories  of  Denmark,  Sweden,  Poland  and  Bohe- 
,  rnia,  teflify  the  famx  thing:  and  if  this  *'  liberty 

(fkJ^d^^t,      "  with  a  mifchief ''  do  not  (till  continue  entire  in  all 

thofe  places,  it  has  been  diminifhed  by  fuch  means 
as  fuit  better  with  the  manners  of  pirates,  than  the 
laws  of  God  and  nature.  If  England  therefore  do 
not  ftill  enjoy  the  fame,  we  muft  have  been  depriv- 
ed of  it  either  by  fuch  unjuftifiable  means,  or  by 
our  own  confent.  But  thanks  be  to  God,  we  know 
no  people  who  have  a  better  right  to  liberty,  or  have 
better  defended  it  than  our  own  nation.  And  if  we 
do  not  degenerate  from  the  virtue  of  our  anceftors, 
we  may  hope  to  tranfmit  it  intire  to  our  pofterity. 
We  always  may,  and  often  do  give  inftrudlions 
to  our  delegates ;  but  the  lefs  we  fetter  them,  the 
more  we  manifeft  our  own  rights :  for  thofe  who 
have  only  a  limited  power,  muft  limit  that  which 
they  give ;  but  he  that  can  give  an  unlimited  power 
muft  neceffarily  have  it  in  himfelf.  The  great  trea- 
furer  Burleigh  faid,  the  parliament  could  do  any 
thing  but  turn  a  man  into  a  woman.  Sir  Thomas 
Moor,  when  Rich  folicitor  to  king  Henry  the  eighth 
afked  him,  if  the  parliament  might  not  make  R. 
Rich  king,  faid,  that  was  Cafus  levis,  taking  it 
for  granted  that  they  might  make  or  unmake 
whom  they  pleafed.  The  firft  part  of  this,  which 
includes  the  other,  is  aflerted  by  the  ftatute  of  the 
thirteenth  of  Q^Elizabeth,  denouncing  the  moft 
grievous  punilhments  againft  all  fuch  as  fhould  dare 
to  contradict  it.     But  if  it  be  in   the  parliament,  it 

muft 


Sea.  44'    CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      37^ 

muft  be  in  thofe  who  give  to  parliament- men  the 
powers  by  which  they  adl ,  for  before  they  are  chofen 
they  have  none,  and  can  never  have  any  if  thofe  that 
fend  them  had  it  not  in  themfelves.  They  cannot 
receive  it  from  the  magiftrate,  for  that  power  which 
he  has  is  derived  from  the  fame  fpring.  The  power 
of  making  and  unmaking  him  cannot  be  from  him- 
felf ;  for  he  that  is  not,  can  do  nothing,  and  when 
he  is  made  can  have  no  other  power  than  is  confer- 
ed  upon  him  by  thofe  that  make  him.  He  who  de- 
parts from  his  duty  defires  to  avoid  the  punifliment, 
the  power  therefore  of  punifhing  him  is  not  from 
himfelf.  It  cannot  be  from  the  houfe  of  peers  as  it 
is  conftituted,  for  they  a6l  for  themfelves,  and  are 
chofen  by  kings  :  and  'tis  abfurd  to  think  that  kings, 
who  generally  abhor  all  reftridtion  of  their  power, 
fhould  give  that  to  others  by  which  they  might  be 
unmade.  If  one  or  more  princes  relying  upon  their 
own  virtue  and  refolutions  to  do  good,  had  given 
fuch  a  power  againft  themfelves,  as  Trajan  did,  when 
he  commanded  the  prefed:  to  ufe  the  fword  for  him 
if  he  governed  well,  and  againft  him  if  he  govern- 
ed ill,  it  would  foon  have  been  refcinded  by  their 
fucceffors.  If  our  Edward  the  firft  had  made  fuch 
a  law,  his  lewd  fon  would  have  aboliflied  it,  before 
he  would  have  fuffered  himfelf  to  be  imprifoned  and 
depofed  by  it.  He  would  never  have  acknowledged 
his  unworthlnefs  to  reign,  if  he  had  been  tied  to  no 
other  law  than  his  own  will,  for  he  could  not  tranf- 
grefs  that  s  nor  have  owned  the  mercy  of  the  par- 
liament in  fparing  his  life,  if  they  had  adled  only  by 
a  power  which  he  had  conferred  upon  them.  This 
power  muft  therefore  be  in  thofe  who  adt  by  a  dele- 
gated power,  and  none  can  give  it  to  their  delegates 
but  they  who  have  it  in  themfelves.  The  moft 
certain  teftimony  that  can  be  given  of  their  unlimit- 

B  b  4  ed 


'^^G  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

ed  power  is,  that  they  rely  upon  the  wifiiom  and 
fidelity  of  their  deputies,  lb  as  to  lay  no  reflridlions 
upon  them  :  they  may  do  what  they  pleafe,  if  they 
take  care  ne  quid  detriment!  refpublica  accipiat,  that 
the  commonwealth  receive  no  detriment.  This  is  a 
commiffion  fit  to  be  granted  by  wife  and  good  men, 
to  thofe  they  choofe  through  an  opinion  that  they 
are  fo  alfo,  and  that  they  cannot  bring  any  prejudice 
upon  the  nation,  that  will  not  fall  upon  themfelves 
and  their  pofterity.  This  is  alfo  fit  to  be  received 
by  thofe,  who  feeking  nothing  but  that  which  is 
jufi  in  itfelf,  and  profitable  to  their  country,  cannot 
forefee  what  will  be  propofed  when  they  are  all  to- 
gether ;  much  lefs  refolve  how  to  vote  till  they  hear 
the  reafons  on  both  fides.  Tlie  eledors  miuft  necef- 
farily  be  in  the  fame  ignorance ;  and  the  law  which 
fliould  oblige  them  to  give  particular  orders  to  their 
knights  and  burgeffes  in  relation  to  every  vote,  would 
make  the  decifion  of  the  moft  important  affairs  to 
depend  upon  the  judgment  of  thofe  who  know  no- 
thing of  the  matters  in  quefl;ion,  and  by  that  means 
caft  the  nation  into  the  utmofi:  danger  of  the  moft  in- 
extricable confufion.  This  can  never  be  the  inten- 
tion of  that  law  which  is  fandtlo  redla,  and  feeks 
only  the  good  of  thofe  that  live  under  it.  The  fore- 
fight  therefore  of  fuch  a  mifchlef  can  never  impair 
the  liberties  of  the  nation,  but  cfiablifh  them. 

SECT.      XLV. 

^he  legif.athe  fo%ver  is  always  arbitrary^  and  not  to 
be  trujled  in  the  hands  of  any  %vbo  are  not  bound  to 
obey  the  laws  they  make. 

F  it  be  objected  that  I  am  a  defender  of  arbitrary 
powers,  I  confefs  I  cannot  comprehend  how  any 
focicty  ciui  be  eftabliined  or  fubfift  without  them ; 

for 


Sea.  45-  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.      377 

for  the  eftablifliment  of  government  is  an  arbitrary 
a6l,  wholly  depending  upon  the  will  of  men.  The 
particular  forms  and  conftitutions,  the  whole  feries 
of  the  magiftracy,  together  with  the  meafure  of 
power  given  to  every  one,  and  the  rules  by  which 
they  are  to  exercife  their  charge,  are  fo  alfo.  Magna 
Charta,  which  comprehends  our  antient  laws,  and 
all  the  fubfequent  ftatutes,  were  not  fent  from  heaven, 
but  made  according  to  the  will  of  men.  If  no  men 
could  have  a  power  of  miaking  laws,  none  could  ever 
have  been  made ;  for  all  that  are  or  have  been  in 
the  world,  except  thofe  given  by  God  to  thelfraelites, 
were  made  by  them  ;  that  is  they  have  exercifed  an 
arbitrary  power  in  making  that  to  be  law  which  was 
not,  or  annulling  that  which  was.  The  various 
laws  and  governments,  that  are  or  have  been  in 
feveral  ages  and  places,  are  the  product  of  various 
opinions  in  thofe  v/ho  had  the  power  of  making 
them.  This  muft  neceffarily  be,  unlefs  a  general 
rule  be  fet  to  all  5  for  the  judgments  of  men  will 
vary  if  they  are  left  to  their  liberty,  and  the  variety 
that  is  found  among  them,  ihews  they  are  fabjed:  to 
no  rule  but  that  of  their  own  reafon,  by  which  they 
fee  what  is  fit  to  be  embraced  or  avoided,  according 
to  the  feveral  circumftances  under  which  they  live. 
The  authority  that  judges  of  thefe  circumftances  is 
arbitrary,  and  the  legiflators  fhew  themfelves  to  be 
more  or  lefs  wife  and  good,  as  they  do  rightly  or  not 
rightly  exercife  this  power.  The  difference  therefore 
between  good  and  ill  governments  is  not,  that  thofe 
of  one  fort  have  an  arbitrary  power  which  the  others 
have  not,  for  they  all  have  it:  but  that  thofe  w^hich 
are  well  conftituted,  place  this  power  fo  as  it  may  be 
beneficial  to  the  people,  and  fet  fuch  rules  as  are 
hardly  to  be  tranfgrefled  ;  whilft  thofe  of  the  other 
fort  fail  in  one  or  both  thefe  points.      Some  alfo 

through 


378  D  I  S  C  OU  R  S  E  S        Chap.  Ill- 

through  want  of  courage,  fortune,  orftrength,  may 
have  been  oppreffed  by  the  violence  of  ftrangers, 
or  fuffer'd  a  corrupt  party  to  rife  up  w^ithin  themfelves, 
and  by  force  or  fraud  to  ufurp  a  power  of  impofing 
what  they  pleafed.     Others  being  fottifh,  cowardly 
and  bafe,  have  fo  far  erred  in  the  foundations,  as  to 
give  up  themfelves  to  the  will  of  one  or  few  men, 
who  turning  all  to  their  own  profit  or  pleafure,  have 
been  juft  in  nothing  but  in  ufing  fuch  a  people  like 
beafts.     Some  have  placed  weak  defences  againft  the 
lufts  of  thofe  they  have  advanced  to  the  higheft 
places,  and  given  them  opportunities  of  arrogating 
more  power  to  themfelves  than  the   law  allows. 
Where  any  of  thefe  errors  are  committed,  the  govern- 
ment may  be  eafy  for  a  while,  or  at  lead  tolerable, 
whiljft  it  continues  uncorrupted,  but  it  cannot  be 
lading.     When  the  law  may  be  eafily  or  fafely  over- 
thrown, it  will  be  attempted.    Whatever  virtue  may 
be  in  the  firft  magiftrates,  many  years  will  not  pafs 
before  they  come  to  be  corrupted  ;  and  their  fuc- 
ceffors  defieding  from  their  integrity,  will  feize  upon 
the   ill-guarded    prey.     They  will  then  not   only 
govern  by  will,  but  by  that  irregular  will,    which 
turns  the   law,  that  was  made  for  the  public  good, 
to  the  private  advantage  of  one  or  few  men.     'Tis 
not  my  intention  to  enumerate  the  feveral  ways  that 
have  been  taken  to  effedl  this;    or  to   fhew  what 
governments  have  defledled  from  the  right,  and  how 
far.     But  I  think  I  may  juftly  fay,  that  an  arbitrary 
power  was  never  well  placed  in  any  men  and  their 
fucceffors,  who  were  not  obliged  to  obey  the  laws  they 
ihould  make.     This  was  well  underftood  by  our 
Saxon  anceftors  :  they  made  laws  in  their  aflemblies 
and  councils  of  the  nation ;  but  all  thofe  who  pro^ 
pofed  or  affented  to  thofe  laws,  asfoon  as  the  affembly 
was  diiTalved,  were  compi*ehcnded  under  the  power 

of 


Sea.  45-  CONCERNING   GOVERNMENT.     579 

of  them  as  well  as  other  men.      They  could  do 
nothing  to  the  prejudice  of  the  nation,  that  would 
not  be  as  hurtful  to  thofe  who  were  prefent  and  their 
pofterity,  as  to  thofe  who  by  many  accidents  might 
beabfent.    The  Normans  enter'd  into,  and  continued 
in  the  fame  path.     Our  parliaments  at  this  day  are  in 
the  fame  condition.     They  may  make  prejudicial 
wars,  ignominious  treaties,  andunjuftlaws:  yet  when 
the  feflion  is  ended,  they  muft  bear  the  burden  as 
much  as  others;  and  when  they  die,  "  the  teeth  of 
"  their  children  will  be  fet  on  edge  with  the  fower 
*'  grapes  they  have  eaten."     But  'tis  hard  to  delude 
or  corrupt  fo  many :  men  do  not  in  matters  of  the 
higheft  importance  yield  to  flight  temptations.     No 
man  ferves  the  devil  for  nothing  :  fmall  wages  will 
not  content  thofe  who  expofe  themfelves  to  perpetual 
infamy,  and  the  hatred  of  a  nation   for  betraying 
their  country.     Our  kings  had  not  wherewithal  to 
corrupt  many  till  thefe  laft  tv/enty   years,  and  the 
treachery  of  a  few  was  not  enough  to  pafs  a  law. 
The  union  of  many  was  not  eafily  wrought,    and 
there  was  nothing  to  tempt  them  to  endeavour  it ; 
for  they  could   make  little  advantage  during  the 
fefTion,  and  were  to  be  loft  in  the  mafs  of  the  peo- 
ple, and  prejudiced  by  their  own  laws,  as  foon  as  it 
was  ended.     They  could  not  in  a  fhort  time  recon- 
cile their  various  interefts  or  paffions,  fo  as  to  com- 
bine together  againft  the  public  ;    and  the  former 
kings  never  went  about  it.     We  are  beholden  to 
H-de,  Cl-if^rd  and  D-nby,  for  all  that  has  been 
done  of  that  kind.     They  found  a  parliament  full  of 
lewd  young  men  chofen  by  a  furious  people  in  fpite 
to  the  Puritans,  whofe  feverity  had  diftafled  them. 
The  weakeft  of  all  minifters  had  wit  enough  to 
landerftand  that  fuch  as  thefe  might  be  eafily  deluded, 

corrupted. 


3So  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

corrupted,  or  bribed.  Some  were  fond  of  their 
feats  in  parliament,  and  delighted  to  domineer  over 
their  neighbours  by  continuing  in  them  :  others 
prefer'd  the  cajoleries  of  the  court  before  the  honour 
of  performing  their  duty  to  the  country  that  employ 'd 
them.  Some  fought  to  relieve  their  ruined  for- 
tunes, and  were  moll  forward  to  give  the  king  a  vaft 
revenue,  that  from  thence  they  might  receive  penfi- 
ons :  others  were  glad  of  a  temporary  protedion 
againfl  their  creditors.  Many  knew  not  what  they 
did  when  they  annulled  the  triennial  ad:,  voted  the 
militia  to  be  in  the  king,  gave  him  the  excife, 
cuftoms  and  chimney-money,  made  the  ad:  for 
corporations,  by  which  the  greateft  part  of  the 
nation  was  brought  under  the  power  of  the  worft  men 
in  it ;  drunk  or  fober  pafs'd  the  five  mile  ad,  and 
that  for  uniformity  in  the  church.  This  emboldened 
the  court  to  think  of  making  parliaments  to  be  the 
inflruments  of  our  flavery,  which  had  in  all  ages 
paft  been  the  firmeft  pillars  of  our  liberty.  There 
might  have  been  perhaps  a  poffibility  of  preventing 
this  pernicious  mifchief  in  the  conftitution  of  our 
government.  But  our  brave  anceftors  could  never 
think  their  pofterity  would  degenerate  into  fuch 
bafenefs  to  fell  themfelves  and  their  country : 
but  how  great  foever  the  danger  may  be,  'tis  lefs 
than  to  put  all  into  the  hands  of  one  man  and 
his  minifters :  the  hazard  of  being  ruin'd  by  thofe 
who  mull  perifh  with  us,  is  not  fo  much  to  be  - 
feared,  as  by  one  who  may  enrich  and  ftrengthen 
himfelf„by  our  dellrudion.  'Tis  better  to  de- 
pend upon  thofe  who  are  under  a  poffibility  of 
being  again  corrupted,  than  upon  one  who  applies 
himfelf  to  corrupt  them,  becaufe  he  cannot  other- 
wife  accomplifn  his  defigns.     It  v/ere  to  be  wiflied 

that 


Seft.  46.     CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     38 1 

that  our  fecurity  were  more  certain  ;  but  tliis  being, 
under  God,  the  bell:  anchor  we  have,  it  deferves 
to  be  preferved  with  all  care,  till  one  of  a  more 
unqueftionable  ftrength  be  framed  by  the  confent  of 
the  nation, 

SECT.      XLVL 

The  coercive  power  of  the   law  proceeds  jrom  the 

authority  of  parliament, 

A  V  I N  G  proved  that  proclamations  are  not 

laws,  and  that  the  legillative  power,  which 

is  arbitrary,  is  trufted  only  in  the  hands  of  thofe 
who  are  bound  to  obey  the  laws  that  are  made,  'tis 
not  hard  to  difcover  what  it  is  that  gives  the  power 
of  law  to  the  fandions  under  v/hich  we  live.     Our 
author  tells  us,  that  ''  all  ftatutes  or  laws  are  made 
properly  by  the  king  alone,  at  the  rogation  of  the 
people,    as   his    majefty  king  James  of  happy 
memory  affirms  in  his  true  law  of  free  monarchy; 
'^  and  as  Hooker  teaches  us,  that  laws  do  not  take 
their  conftraining  power  from  the  quality  of  iiich 
as  devife  them,  but  from  the  power  that  giveth 
*'  them  the  ftrength  of  law."     But  if  the  rogation  of 
the  people  be  necefTary,  that  cannot  be  a  law  which 
proceeds  not  from  their  rogation  :   the  power  there- 
fore is  not  alone  in  the  king ;  for  a  moft  important 
part  is  confefled  to  be  in  the  people.     And  as  none 
could  be  in  them,  if  our  author's  propofition,  or 
the  principles  upon  which  it  is  grounded  were  true, 
the ,  acknowledgement  of  fuch  a  part  to  be  in   tlie 
people  {hews  them  to  be  falfe,     For  if  the  king 
had  all  in  himfelf,  none  could  participate  with  him  : 
if  any  do   participate,    he  hath    not  all ;    and    'tis 
from  that  law  by  which  they  do  participate,  that 

we 


<c 

cc 


S^2  DISCOURSES         Chap.  IIL 

we  are  to  know  what  part  is  left  to  him.  The  pre- 
ambles of  moft  a6ts  of  parliaments  manifefi:  this  by 
the  words,  "  Be  it  enadled  by  the  lords  fpiritualand 
*'  temporal,  and  commons  in  parliament  aflembled, 
*'  and  by  authority  of  the  fame."  But  king 
James,  fays  Filmer,  ''  in  his  law  of  free  monarchy 
"  affirms  the  contrary ;"  and  it  may  be  fo,  yet  that 
is  nothing  to  us.  No  man  doubts  that  he  defired  it 
might  be  fo  in  England :  but  it  does  not  from  thence 
appear  that  it  is  fo.  The  law  of  a  free  monarchy  is 
nothing  to  us ;  for  that  monarchy  is  not  free  which 
IS  regulated  by  a  law  not  to  be  broken  without  the 
guilt  of  perjury,  as  he  himfelf  confefTed  in  relation 
to  ours.  As  to  the  words  cited  from  Hooker  *, 
I  can  find  no  hurt  in  them.  To  draw  up  the  form 
of  a  good  law,  is  a  matter  of  invention  and  judg- 
ment, but  it  receives  the  force  of  a  law  from  the 
power  that  enafts  it.  We  have  no  other  reafon  for 
the  payment  of  excife  or  cuftoms,  than  that  the  par- 
liament has  granted  thofe  revenues  to  the  king  to  de- 
fray the  public  charges.  Whatever  therefore  king 
James  was  pleafed  to  fay  in  his  books,  or  in  thofe 
written  for  him,  we  do  not  fo  much  as  know  that 
the  killing  of  a  king  is  treafon,  or  to  be  punifhed 
with  death,  other  wife  than  as  it  is  enafted  by  par- 
liament J  and  it  was  not  always  fo  :  for  in  the  time  of 
Etlielftan  -j-,  the  eftimates  of  lives  wxre  agreed  in 
parliament,  and  that  of  a  king  valued  at  thirty 
thoufand  Thrymf^.  And  if  that  law  had  not  been 
altered  by  the  parliament,  it  muft  have  been  in  force 
at  this  day.  It  had  been  in  vain  for  a  king  to  fay  he 
w^ould  have  it  other  wife ;  for  he  is  not  created  to 
make  laws,  but  to  govern  according  to  fuch  as  are 

*  Speech  in  ftar  chamber,   i6i,6. 
f  Leg,  yEthclilani,  fol.  i  j, 

made^ 


Sea:.46.   CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT,     383 

made,  and  fworn  to  aflent  to  "  fuch  as  fliall  be 
**  propofed  *."  He  who  thinks  the  crown  not  worth 
accepting  on  thefe  conditions,  may  refufe  it.  The 
words  ^*  Le  roy  le  veut,"  are  only  a  pattern  of  the 
French  fafliions,  upon  which  fome  kings  have  laid 
great  (Irefs,  and  would  no  doubt  have  been  glad  to 
introduce  **  Car  tel  eft  noftre  plaiiir  5"  but  that  may 
prove  a  difficult  matter.  Nay  in  France  itfelf,  where 
that  ftile,  and  all  the  ranting  expreffions  that  pleafe 
the  vaineft  of  men,  are  in  mode,  no  edift  has  the 
power  of  a  law,  till  it  be  regiftred  in  parliament. 
This  is  not  a  mere  ceremony  as  fome  pretend,  but  all 
that  is  elTential  to  a  law.  Nothing  has  been  more 
common  than  for  thofe  parliaments  to  refufe  edids 
fent  to  them  by  the  king.  When  John  Chaftel  had, 
at  the  inftigation  of  the  Jefuits,  ftabb'd  Henry  the 
fourth  in  the  mouth,  and  that  order  had  defigned  or 
executed  many  other  execrable  crimes,  they  were 
banifhed  out  of  the  kingdom  by  an  arret  of  the 
parliament  of  Paris.  Some  other  parliaments  regiftred 
the  fame  -,  but  thofe  of  Tholoufe  and  Bordeaux 
abfolutely  refufed,  and  notwithftanding  all  that  the 
king  could  do,  the  Jefuits  continued  at  Tournon  and 
many  other  places  vvdthin  their  precindls,  till  the  arret 
was  revoked.  Thefe  proceedings  are  fo  difpleafing 
to  the  court,  that  the  moft  violent  ways  have  been 
often  ufed  to  abolifti  them.  About  the  year  1 650  -f-, 
Seguier  then  chancellor  of  France  was  fent  with  a 
great  number  of  foldiers  to  oblige  the  parliament  of 
Paris  to  pafs  fome  edidls  upon  which  they  had 
hefitated  :  but  he  was  fo  far  from  accompliftiing 
his  defign,  that  the  people  rofe  againft  him,  and  he 
thought  himfelf  happy  that  he  efcaped  with  his  life. 
If  the  parliam.ents  do  not  in  all  parts  of  the  king- 
dom continue  in  the  liberty  of  approving  or  rejeding 

*  Qiias  valgus  elegerit.  f  A4cm,  de  L.  R.  F. 

all 


384  DISCOURSES        Chap.  III. 

all  edlds,  the  law  is  not  altered,  but  oppreffcd  by 
the  violence  of  the  fvvord :  and  the  prince  of  Conde 
who  was    principally  employ'd   to  do  that  work, 
may,  as  I  fuppofe,  have  had  leifure  to  refled:  upon 
thofe  actions,  and  cannot  but  find  reafon  to  conclude, 
that  his  excellent  valour  and  condufl:  was  ufed  in  a 
moft  noble  exploit,  equally  beneficial  to  his  country 
and  himfelf.     Hov/ever,  thofe  v/ho  are  fkilled  in  the 
laws  of  that  nation  do  ftill  affirm,  that  all  public 
ads  which  are  not  duly  examined  and  regiftred,  are 
void  in  themfelves,  and  can  be  of  no  force  lonp-er 
than  the  miferable  people  lies  under  the  violence  of 
oppreffion ;  which  is  all  that  could  reafonably  be  faid, 
if  a  pirate  had  the  fame  power  over  them.     But 
whether  the  French  have  v/illingly  offered  their  ears 
to' be  bor'd,  or  have  been  fubdued  by  force,  it  con- 
cerns us  not.     Our  liberties  depend  not  upon  their 
will,  virtue,  or  fortune  :  how  wretched  and  fhame- 
ful  foever  their  flavery  may  be,  the  evil  is  only  to 
themfelves.     We  are  to  confider  no  human  laws  but 
our  own;  and  if  we  have  the  fpirit  of  our  anceflors 
we  fliall  maintain  them,  and  die  as  free  as  they  left 
us.     "  Le  roy  le  veut,"  tho'  written  in  great  letters, 
or  pronounced  in  the  mofl  tragical   mianner,  can 
fignify  no  more  than  that  the  king  in  performance  of 
his  oath  does  aflent  to    fiich  laws  as  the  lords  and 
commons  have  agreed.    Without  prejudice  to  them- 
felves and   their  liberties,  a  people  may  fuffer  the 
king  to  advife  with  his  council  upon   v/hat  they 
propofe.     Two  eyes  fee  more  than  one,  and  human 
iudgment  is  fubjedt  to  errors.     Tho'  the  parliament 
con  fife  of  the  mofl:  eminent  men  of  the  nation,  yet 
when  they  intend   eood,  thev   mav   be  miftaken. 
They  may    fafely    put  a  check  upon   themfelves, 
that  they   may  fartlier  confider  the  moft  important 

J  .  matters. 


Sea.  46.    CONERNING  GOVERNMENT.      385 

matters,  and  corredl  ihe  errors  that  may  have  been 
committed^  if  the  king's  council  do  difcover  them  : 
but  he  can  fpcak  only  by  the  advice  of  his  council ; 
and  every  man  of  them  is  with  his  head  to  anfv^er  for 
the  advices  he  gives.  If  the  parliament  has  not  been 
fatisiied  with  the  reafons  given  againft  any  law  that 
they  offer'd,  it  has  frequently  pafs'dj  and  if  they 
have  been  fatisfied,  'twas  not  the  king-,  but  they  that 
laid  it  afide.  He  that  is  of  another  opinion,  m.ay 
try  whether  "  Le  roy  le  veut"  can  give  the  force  of 
a  law  to  any  thing  conceived  by  the  king,  his  council, 
or  any  other  than  the  parliament.  But  if  no  W'ife 
man  will  affirm  that  he  can  do  it,  or  deny  that  by 
his  oath  he  is  obliged  to  aflent  to  thofe  that  come 
from  them,  he  can  neither  have  the  legifiative 
power  in  himfelf,  nor  any  other  part  in  it  than  what 
is  neceffarily  to  be  performed  by  him,  ds  the  law 
prefcribes. 

I  know  not  what  our  author  means  by  faying, 
"  Le  roy  le  veut  is  the  interpretative  phrafe  pro- 
"  nounced  at  the  paffing  of  every  a6l  of  parlia- 
^'  ment :"  for  if  there  be  difficulty  in  any  of  them,, 
thofe  W'ords  do  no  way  remove  it.  But  the  folio w^- 
ing  part  of  the  paragraph  better  defervcs  to  be  ob- 
ferved.  "  It  v^^as,  fays  he,  the  antient  cuftom  for 
a  long  time,  until  the  days  of  Henry  the  fifth, 
for  the  kings  when  any  bill  was  brought  to  them 
that  had  paffed  both  houfes,  to  take  and  pick  out 
what  they  liked  not ;  and  fo  much  as  they  chofe 
*'  was  enadted  as  a  law  :  but  the  cuflom  of  the  lat- 
*^  ter  kings  hath  been  fo  gracious,  as  to  allow  al- 
*'  ways  of  the  intire  bill  as  it  paiTed  both  houfes." 
He  judicioufly  obferves  v^hen  our  kings  began  to  be 
gracious,  and  we  to  be  free.  That  king  excepting 
the  perfecution  for  religion  ii  his  time,  which  is  ra- 
ther to  be  imputed  to  the  ignorance  of  that  age. 
Vol.  II.  C  c  than 


cc 

(C 
(  c 


5^6  DISCOURSES         Chap.  III. 

than  to  any  evil  in  his  own  nature)  governed  v^ell ; 
and  as  all  princes  v^ho  have  been  virtuous  and  brave 
have  always  defired  to  preferve  their  fubjedls  liberty, 
which  they  knew  to  be  the  mother  and  nurfe  of 
their  valour,  fitting  them  for  great  and  generous  en- 
terprlzes,  his  care  was  to  pleafe  them,  and  to  raife 
their  fpirits.  But  about  the  fame  time,  thofe  de- 
teftable  arts  by  which  the  mixed  monarchies  in  this 
part  of  the  world  have  been  every  where  terribly 
fhaken,  and  in  many  places  totally  overthrown,  be- 
gan to  be  pradifed.  Charles  the  feventh  of  France, 
under  pretence  of  carrying  on  a  war  againft  him  and 
his  fon,  took  upon  him  to  raife  money  by  his  own 
authority,  and  we  know  how  well  that  method  has 
been  purfued.  The  mifchievous  fagacity  of  his  fon 
Lev/is  the  eleventh,  which  is  now  called  king-craft, 
was  wholly  exerted  in  the  fubverlion  of  the  laws  of 
France,  and  the  nobility  that  fupported  them.  His 
fucceffors,  except  only  Lewis  the  twelfth,  followed 
his  example ;  and  in  other  nations,  Ferdinand  of 
Arragon,  James  the  third  of  Scotland,  and  Henry 
the  feventh  of  England,  were  thought  to  imitate 
him  the  moft.  Tlio'  we  have  little  reafon  to  com- 
mend all  the  princes  that  preceded  Henry  the  fifth; 
yet  I  am  inclined  to  date  the  general  impairing  of 
our  government  from  the  death  of  that  king,  and 
his  valiant  brothers.  His  weak  fon  became  a  prey 
to  a  furious  French  woman,  who  brought  the  max- 
ims of  her  own  country  into  ours,  and  advanced  the 
worft  of  villains  to  govern  according  to  them.  Thefe 
meafures  were  purfued  by  Edward  the  fourth, 
whofe  wants  contraded  by  prodigality  and  debauch- 
ery, were  to  be  fupplled  by  fraud  and  rapine.  The 
ambition,  cruelty  and  perfidioufnefs  of  Richard  the 
third ;  the  covetoufnefs  and  malicious  fubtilty  of 
Henry  the  fcventh  j  the  violent  lufl,  rage  and  pride 

of 


Sea.  4^.  CONCERNING   GOVERNMENT.     387 

of  Henry  the  eighth,  and  the  bigotted  fury  of  queen 
Mary^  inftigated  by  the  craft  and  malice  of  Spain, 
perfuaded  me  to  believe  that  the  Englifli  liberty  did 
not  receive  birth  or  growth  from  the  favour  and 
goodnefs  of  their  gracious  princes.  But  it  feems  all 
this  is  miftaken  -,  Henry  the  fixth  v^as  wife,  valiant, 
and  no  way  guided  by  his  wife  >  Edward  the  fourth 
continent,  fober,  and  contented  with  whkt  the  na- 
tion gave  him  ;  Richard  the  third  mild,  gentle  and 
faithful;  Henry  the  feventh  fincere,  and  fatisfied 
with  his  own  ;  Henry  the  eighth  humble,  temperate 
and  juft ;  and  queen  Mary  a  friend  to  our  country 
and  religion.  No  lefs  praifes  fure  can  be  due  to 
thofe  who  were  fo  gracious  to  recede  from  their 
own  right  of  picking  what  they  pleafed  out  of  our 
laws,  and  to  leave  them  intirely  to  us  as  they  paffed 
both  houfes.  We  are  beholden  to  our  author  for 
the  difcovery  of  thefe  myfleries :  but  tho'  he  feems 
to  have  taken  an  oath  like  that  of  the  gypiies  when 
they  enter  into  that  virtuous  fociety,  never  to  fpeak 
one  v/ord  of  truth,  he  is  not  fo  fubtle  in  concealing 
his  lies.  All  kings  were  trufled  with  the  publica- 
tion of  the  lav/s,  but  all  kings  did  not  falfify  them. 
Such  as  were  not  wricked  and  vicious,  or  fo  weak  as 
to  be  made  fubfervient  to  the  malice  of  their  mi- 
niilers  and  flatterers,  could  never  be  drawn  into  the 
guilt  of  fo  infamous  a  cheat,  directly  contrary  to 
the  oath  of  their  coronation.  They  fwear  to  pafs 
fuch  ''  laws  *  as  the  people  choofe  /'  but  if  we  will 
believe  our  author,  they  might  have  pick'd  out 
whatever  they  pleafed,  and  falfly  impofed  upon  the 
nation,  as  a  law  made  by  the  lords  and  commons, 
that  which  they  had  modelled  according  to  their 
own  will,  and  made  to  be  different  from,  or  con- 
trary to  the  intention  of  the  parliament.  The  king's 

*  Q^as  vulgus  elegerit. 

C  c  2  part 


3SS  DISCOURSES        Chap.  111. 

part  in  this  fraud  (of  which  he  boafts)  was  little  more 
than  might  have  been  done  by  the  fpeaker  or  his 
clerks.  They  might  have  faliified  an  adl  as  well  as 
the  king,  tho'  they  could  not  fo  well  preferve  them- 
felves  from  puniiliment.  Tis  no  wonder  if  for  a 
while  no  flop  was  put  to  fuch  an  abominable  cuftom. 
'Twas  hard  to  think  a  king  would  be  guilty  of  a 
frauds  that  were  infamous  in  a  (lave :  but  that  prov- 
ed to  be  a  fmall  feeuritv,  when  the  word  of  flaves 
came  to  govern  them,  Neverthelefs  'tis  probable 
they  proceeded  cautiouily  :  the  firft  alterations  were 
perhaps  innocent,  or,  it  may  be,  for  the  beft.  But 
when  they  had  once  found  out  the  way,  they  ftuck 
at  nothing  that  leemed  for  their  purpofe.  This  Vv^as 
like  the  plague  of  leprofy,  that  could  not  be  cured  ^ 
the  houfe  infe&d  was  to  be  demolifhed  3  the  poi- 
fonous  plant  muft  be  torn  up  by  the  root ;  the  truft 
that  had  been  broken  was  to  be  abolifhed ;  they  who 
had  perverted  or  fruilrated  the  law,  were  no  longer 
to  be  fa ffered  to  make  the  leaft  alteration  ;  and  that 
brave  prince  readily  joined  with  his  people  to  extin- 
guiih  the  mifchievous  abufe  that  had  been  introduc- 
ed by  fome  of  his  worthlefs  predeceffors.  The  worft 
and  bafeft  of  them  had  continual  difputes  with  their 
parliaments,  and  thought  that  v/hatever  they  could 
detract  from  the  liberty  of  the  nation,  would  ferve 
to  advance  their  prerogative.  They  delighted  in 
frauds,  and  Vv^ould  have  no  other  minifters  but  fuch 
as  would  be  the  indruments  of  them.  Since  their 
word  could  not  be  made  to  pafs  for  a  law,  they  en- 
deavoured to  impofe  their  own  or  their  fervants  in- 
ventions as  a6ts  of  parliaments,  upon  the  deluded 
people,  and  to  make  the  belt  of  them  fubfervient  to 
their  corrupt  ends  and  pernicious  counfels.  This,  if 
it  had  continued,  might  have  overthrown  all  our 
rights,  and  deprived  us  of  ar-1  that  men  call  good  in 

the 


Sea.  44.  CONCERNING  GOVERNMENT.     389  * 

the  world.  But  the  providence  of  God  furniihed  our 
anceftors  with  an  opportunity  of  providing  againft  fo 
great,  fo  univerfal  a  mifchief.  Tiiey  had  a  wife  and 
valiant  prince,  who  icorned  to  encroach  upon  the 
liberties  of  his  fubjecfts,  and  abhorred  the  detefiable 
arts  by  which  they  had  been  impaired.  He  efteeni- 
ed  their  courage,  ftrength,  and  love,  to  be  his  great- 
eft  advantage,  riches  and  glory.  He  aimed  at  the 
conqueft  of  France,  which  was  only  to  be  effedled 
by  the  bravery  of  a  free  and  well-fatisfied  people. 
Slaves  will  always  be  cowards,  and  enemies  to  their 
mafter  :  by  bringing  his  fubjedts  into  that  condition, 
he  muft  infallibly  have  ruined  his  own  defigns,  and 
made  them  unfit  to  fight  either  for  him  or  them- 
felves.  He  de fired  not  only  that  his  people  fliould 
be  free  during  his  time,  but  that  his  fuccefibrs  fhould 
not  be  able  by  oblique  and  fraudulent  ways  to 
enflave  them.  If  it  be  a  reproach  to  us  that  women 
have  reigned  over  us,  'tis  much  more  to  the  princes 
that  fucceeded  our  Henry,  that  none  of  them  did  fo 
much  imitate  him  in  his  government  as  queen  Eliza- 
beth. She  did  not  go  about  to  mangle  adts  of  par- 
liament, and  to  pick  out  what  might  ferve  her  turn, 
but  frequently  pafl!ed  forty  or  fifty  in  a  feflion,  with- 
out reading  one  of  them.  She  knew  that  fhe  did 
not  reign  for  her  felf,  but  for  her  people  3  that  what 
was  good  for  thenijWas  either  goodfor  her,  or  that  her 
good  ought  not  to  come  into  competition  with  that 
of  the  whole  nation ;  and  that  fhe  was  by  oath  ob- 
liged to  pafs  fuch  laws  as  were  prefented  to  her  on 
their  behalf  This  not  only  fliews  that  there  is  no  fuch 
thing  as  a  legiflative  power  placed  in  kings  by  the 
laws  of  God  and  nature,  but  that  nations  have  it 
in  themfelves.  It  was  not  by  law  nor  by  right,  but 
by  ufurpation,  fraud  and  perjury  that  fome  kings 
took  upon  thern  to  pick  what  they  pleafed  out  of 

C  c  3  the 


300  DISCOURSES        Chap.  TIL 

the  public  adls.  Henry  the  fifth  did  not  grant  us 
the  right  of  making  our  own  laws  5  but  with  his 
approbation  we  abolifhed  a  deteftable  abufe  that 
plight  have  proved  fatal  to  us.  And  if  we  examine 
our  hiftory  we  ihall  find,  that  every  good  and  ge- 
nerous  prince  has  fought  to  eftablifh  our  liberties,  as 
n-iuch  as  the  moft  bafe  and  wicked  to  infringe  them- 


THE    END, 


A  N 


ALPHABETICAL 


rr^ 


FABLE 


# 


The  Letters  refer  to  the  Volume^  ao4  the  Figures  to  the  Page. 


A. 


AARO  Ny  vid.  Mofesp 
Abdication^    Camillas   the   dic- 
tator obllg'd  to  abdicate  his 
magiftracy,  i.  452. 
^rahanty   and  tke  patriarchs  not  kings, 

'•  i7>  33-      . 
Could  never  exercife  a  regal  power,  i.  32. 

Liv'd  with  Lot  in  perfed  freedom,  i. 

132. 
^brogatioTiy  where  a  perfon  abrogates  the 

magiftracy,  i.  176,    316,   319. 
God  declar'd  Saul's  kingdom  to  be  in- 

tirelv  abrogated,  ii.  18. 
A  whole  people,  or  part  of  them,  may 

at  their  own  Pleafure  abrogate  a  king- 
dom, ii.  19. 
What  is  faid  to  be  fo,  ii.  121. 
Kcne  can  abrogate  the  law  of  God,  ii, 

178,  180. 
^falom,  his  (revolt,  ii.  22,  24, 
jibjdute  power  and  monarchy,  out  in  its 

firft  beginning,  i.  31,  78. 
Of    France  and  Turky,    i.    78,    127, 

217,  278,  280.  ii.  J85. 
Burdenfom  and  dangerous,  i,  123. 
Who  fit   fubje£ts  for  it,  i.  168,  262, 

273,  276. 
Scarce  ever  conquer'd  a  free  people,  i. 

186,  199,  280,  292. 
Who  advocates  for  it,  i,  188,  230. 
Nothing  more  mutable,  or  unftable,  i. 

189,  195. 
Can't  bereftrain'd  by  law,  i,  195,  266, 

269,  273. 
Where  it  fhould  be  of  more  flrength 

than  the  limited,  i,  197, 


The  fad  effefts  of  it,  i,  119,  331,  375, 

376,  377.  ii.  185,  188,  363,  364. 
Rome  decay'd,   and  perifh'd  under  it, 

i.  222. 
The  root  and  foundation  of  it,  i.  238, 

264,  267. 
Not  eftablifli'd  among   the  Greeks  by 

law,  i.  248, 
Encourages  venality   and  corruption,  u 

262,  263,  361. 
Advances  the  worft  of  men,  i.  266,  268, 

270,  327. 
In  what  fenfe  moft  contrary  to  nature, 

i.  272. 
By  whom  only  to  be  endur'd,  i.  276, 

ii.  185. 
The  people  under  it  always  miferable,  u 

i7?>  303*  30^>  360. 
All  things  manag'd  by  one,  or  a  very 

few  men,  i.  281. 

Seems  totally  to  be  exempted  from  miff- 
takes,  and  why,  i.  310. 

Almoft  all  troubles  arifing  in  them,  pro- 
ceed from  malice,  i.  311. 

Sedition  moft  frequently  in,  and  natural 
to  them,  i,   326,  330,  347,  350, 

35^' 
By  what  means  this  arbitrary  power  is 

fet  up,  i.  327,  359^ 

Few  or  none  long  fubfift  under  it,  i.  342. 

Where  it  cannot  be  introduc'd,  i.  363. 

Integrity  not  to  be  found  therein,  i.  370, 

What  care  fuch  monarchs  have  for  their 
people,  i.  385,  386. 

Their  chief  labour  is  to  be  above  th? 
law,  i.  414* 
/^bjolute  power,    no  foclety  can  be  efta- 
bUfh'd,    or  fubfift  without  it  Some- 
where, ii,  376. 

■  C  c  ^  Nevei 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

Kever  well  plac'd  in  men  and  their  fuc     y^hah^  growing  fick  on  NabotH^s  refufine 


ceifors,    if    not  cblig'd  to  obey   the 
laws  that  {hould  be  made,  il.  378. 

jihtijes  in  government,  when  never  to  be 
reform'd,  i.  399. 

j^ccounty  to  whom  the  people  of  Rome 
were  to  give  theirs,  i.  63. 

^ccufers,  vid.  falfe  witnefles. 

^ccjuifition ,  what  right  can  be  pretended 
from  it,  ii.  282. 

^^s  of  Parlisment,  till  the  days  of  Henry 
V.  for  the  moft  part  were  pen'd  by 
the  king's  officers,  jl.  235,  385. 
Vid.  Statutes. 

jSdam,  his  fin,  what,  j.  6. 
His  kingdom,  i.  2S. 
Had  only   an   oeconomical,    not  a  po- 
litical power,  i.  129. 

Adoption,  wherein  the  tolly  of  it,  i.  87, 
89,  90,  92. 
What  may  be  call'd  (o  improperly,  i, 

87,  89. 
Jacob  adopted  Ephraim  and  ManafTeb, 
i.  126. 


him  his  vineyard,  ii.  50. 
When  his  houfe  was  to  be  cut  off,  ii. 
340. 
Alexander  of    Macedon,    thought   to   be 
meant  by  Ariftotle  for  the  man  fram'd 
by  nature  for  a  king,  i.  io8,  113, 

.'93- 
His  extravagant  frolicks,  1.  193. 

His  fortune  overthrew  his  virtue,  i.  193, 

199.  ii.  337. 
His  reign  full  of  confprracles,  i.  331. 
After  his  death  the  kingdom  fell  all  to 

pieces,  i.  241, 
It  is  thought  he  dy*d  by  poifonj  i.  24?, 

381. 
Alexander   of  Epirus,    in    valour    thought 

equal,  in  power  little  inferior  to  him, 

i.  304. 
Alfred,  Magna  Charta  grounded  upon  his 

laws,  i.  iS. 
Acknowledge   he   found  and   left   this 

kingdom  perfedly  free,  ii.  292. 
Alienation^  vid.  Dominion, 


Advancements,  ought  ever  to  be  for   the     Allegiance,  is  fuch  an  obedience  as  the  law 
fake  of  the  publick,  not  of  the  Man, 
i.  113. 
Have  oftentimes  made  people  worfe,  ii. 


Ill,  112. 

Adveijary,  who  a  vitious  prince  reckons 
fuch,  i.  387. 


requires,  ii.  250,   303. 
Cannot  rel.iPe  to  a  whoe  nation,  ii.  303. 
Alliances,  \.  143,  216,   38 1. 
All  things  in  thtir  beginning  are  weak,  i, 

,297. 
Change  by  length  oi  time,  1.  506. 


Adultery,  became  as  common  in  Sparta,  as     Altar,  the  horns  of  it  no   pretention   to 


jn  any  part  of  the  world,  and  why, 

ii.  4. 
Cannot  be  difpens'd  withal,  even  by  the 

pope  himfelf,  ii.  272. 
AffiEiions  cf  the  people,  the  prince's  moft 

important  treafure,   i.  439. 
Agefilausy  his  great  atchievements,  i.  19S, 

249. 
His  denial  of  Artaxerxes  to  be  greater 

than  He,  ii.  49. 
Xenoplion's  great  chara£ler  of  him,  and 

for  wiiatj  ii.  86. 
Agreements,  the  treachery  cf  violating  them 

aggravated  by  perjury,  i.  321. 

vid.  ContraHs. 
Made:  by  king  John  of  France,  when 

prifoner  at  London,  and  Francis  under 

the  fame  circumftincesat  Madiid,  re- 
puted null,  i.  424. 
A  good  mjn  performs  them  tho'  he  is  a 

lofer  by  the  bargain,  ii.  143. 
The  neceility  of  ftanding  to  them  from 

religion,  and  the   law  of  nature,   ii. 

Between  princes  confirm'd  afterwards  by 

parliaments,  fefj.  ii.  353. 
ripp'i   (Menenius)   appeas'd  one   of  the 

moft  violent  feditions  at  Rome,  and 

iiovy,  i.  310. 


wilful  murderers,  ii   84, 
Ambajfadors,  from  whence  kings  have  their 

right  of  fending. them,  ii.  267,   353. 
Charles    Guflavus,  his   excellent   faying 

to  one,  ii.  277. 
From  the  Piivernates,  their  brave  and 

refolute  anfwer  to  Plautius  the  confui, 

when  they  were  fuing  for  a  peace,  ii; 

302. 
From   the  eftates  of   Scotland,    to   Q^ 

Eliz.  ii.  341, 
Ambition,  honeft  and  wife  men  expofe  the 

folly  of  it,  i.  90,  123. 
Can  never  give  a  right  to  any  over  the 

liberties  of  a  whole  nation,  i.  144, 
Tends  to  publick  ruin,  i.  247. 
Is  the  overthrow  of  flates  and  empires, 

i.  263,  265. 
Man  naturally  prone  to  it,  1.  266. 
What  it  prompts  to,  i.  336. 
Has  produc'd  more  mifchiefs  than  any 
'    other  defires  and  palTions,  i.  342,  350, 

353.   359- 
St.  Ambrose,  feems  to  have  no  knowledge 

of  the  gothick  polity,  ii.  68. 

A/iceJiors,  what  we  ought  to  do,  if  we  will 

be  juft  to  them,  ii.  314,  389. 

Never  thought  their   posterity   would  fo 

degenerate,  as  to  fell  themfelves  and 

Vijeir  country,  ii.  380. 

By 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


By  exerting  their  vigor  we  fliall  maintain 

our  laws,  ii.  384.. 
jln^li,  or  Saxons ;  Ticitus  his  defcriptlon 

of  their  coming  hither,  and  that  they 

had  the  root  of  power  and  liberty  in 

themfelves,  ii.  244. 
AntiocbuSf  his  vain  boaft  to  deftroy  Greece 

and  Italy,  i.  199. 
How  foon  he  loft  all  he  pofleft  in  Greece, 

&c.  i.  283. 
j^pojiki,  what  their  work  was  in  relation 

to  the  civil  ftate,  i.  326.  ii.  90,  94, 

99- 

Appanages,  in_France  to  the  king's  bro- 
thers, produc'd  very  bad  effefts,  i. 

242. 
Or  xo  their  fons,  but  they  remain  ft  ill 

fubjeft  to  the  crown,  i.  427.  ii.  161. 
Appeals,  the  right  of  them  to  the  people, 

i.  ail,  212,  220,  234,  257,  321. 

ii.  S5,  114. 
None  from  parliamentary  decrees,  i.  317, 
To  whom  they  were  made  when  there 

was  in  Rome  no  fuperior  magiftrate  in 

being,  ii.   114. 
No  pardoning  a  Man  condemn'd  upon 

one,  ii.  356. 
An  inftance  of  it,  ii.  357. 
Arcana  imperii,  how  to  be  meddled  with, 

i.  12,  13,  I4« 
Ar-ians,  as  cruel  as  the  Pagans,  5.  194, 
Ariftocracy,  what,  i.  38.  ii.  130. 
For  whom  befl,  i.  107. 
How  fet  up,  i.  116. 
Was  the  Jewi/h  government,   i,    170, 

"Who  patrons  for  it,  i.  276. 

The  Lacedemonians  for  it,  i.  433. 

Whether  it  feems  eftablifli'd  by  nature, 
ii.  202. 
Ariftotle,  flighted  by  Filmer,  i.  20. 

Commendation  of  him,  i.  IC2,   1S3. 

His  notion  of  civil  focieties,  i.  105,  107, 
112,   113,   122,   169,  416. 

Who  he  thought  was  fram'd  by  na- 
ture for  a  king,  i.  108,   113,   192. 

Wherein  he  highly  applauds  monarchy, 
i.  183,  1S4. 

Thinks  the  firft  monarchs  were  but  little 
reilrain'd,  becaufe  they  were  chofea 
for  their  virtue,  i.  419. 

His  didinftion  between  a  king  and  a 
tyrant,  ii.  50.  2CI. 

Who,  he  fays,  are  govern'd  by  God, 
rather  than  by  men,  :i.  123,  124. 

Proves  that  no  man  is  entrufted  with  an 
abfolute  power,  li.  201. 
Armies,  of  the  eaft  and  weft,  fet  up  em- 
perors for  themfelves,  j.  206. 

Put  of  what  fcrt  of  men  they  arc  tp  be 
form'c,  i.  303. 
yid.  r.ircer.ary  wd  foldiery. 


ArmirJus,  kill'd  for  aiming  at  a  crown, 
which  blemifh'd  all  his  other  virtues, 
ii.  100,  243. 
Arms,  thofe  juft  and  pious  that  are  necef- 
fary,  and  thofe  neccffary,  when  there 
was  no  hope  of  fifety  by  any  other 
way,  li.  342. 
Artaxetxes,  and   his  army  overthrown   bv 
the  valor  of  loooo  Gredans,  i,  197, 
198. 
Artificer ^  what  fort  of  one  he  is  to  whom 

implicit  faith  is  due,   i.  12. 
Ajfemblies,  that  took  their  authority  from 
the  law  of  nature,  confider'd,  i.  141. 
General   of  the  people,    i,    175,    176, 
178. 

The  ufe  of  them,  i.  195.  ij.  246. 
Of  the  eftates  in  France,  brought  now 

to  nothing,  i.  243. 
Settled  the  crown  on  Pepin,  i.  348, 
What  they  ought  to  fee  perform'd,  i. 

42S. 
Had  the  power  always  of  the  whole 

people  in  them,  ii.  73. 
In  them  none  judge  for  themfelves, 

ii.  116. 
The  greateft   truft  that  can  be  was 

ever  repos'd  in  them,  ii.  238. 
InconGftent   with   the  abfolute  fovc- 

rejgnty  of  kings,  ii.  250. 
Refus'd  giving  fupplies  to  their  kings 
in  Spain  and  France,  without  orders 
from  their  principals,  ii.  372,  373, 
AJfyrians,  vid.  Eajiern  nations. 

That  empire    wholly  abolifh'd  on  the 

death  of  Belfhazzar,  i.  191. 
Their  valor  irrefiftible  under  Nebuchad- 
nezzar, i.  299. 
Little  more  known  of  them  than  from 
fcripture,  i.  334. 
Athaliah,  more  ready  to   cry  out  treafon 
than  David,  i.   313.     Deftroy'd  the 
king's  race,  and  by  whom  herfelf  was 
kill'd,  i.  530.  vid.  ^een. 
Athens,  its  government  not  fo  much  ap- 
prov'd  as  that  of  Sparta,  i.  249, 
Banifh'd   fome   worthy    men,    and   put 

others  to  death,  i.  z^^o. 
The  cruelty  of  the  thirty  tyrants  there, 

i.  251. 
As  much  indin'd  to  war  as  Rome,  i. 

287. 
The  thirty  tyrants  deftroy'd  by  Thrafy- 

bulus,  i.  315. 
Their  Oftracifm  proceeded  folely  from 

fear,  i.  412. 
Was  not  without  laws  when  ihe  had 
kings,  ii.  109. 
At}Jetickhz\>\t.,   what,  i.  214,  215,  2^1. 
Attilii,  call'd  the  fcourge  of  God,  and  glo- 

ry'd  in  the  name,  ii.  132. 
Avar  ice  f  the  evil  effedts  of  it,  i,  19  t. 

AugufluS 


An  Alpbabetical  TABLE. 


jSu^uflut,  Rome's  longeft  peace  under  his 
"  reign,  i.  219,   331, 
"What  h-ippen'd  in  it,  i.  224. 
"Was  worie  in  the   beginning  than  latter 

end  of  his  reign,  i.  226. 
Had  thiity  mercenary  legions  to  execute 

his  commands,  ii.  206, 
Whether   he  truly  deferv'd  to  be  call'd 

the  head  of  the  Romans,  ii.  331. 
The  name  of  Augullus  is  a  title  belong- 
ing to  the  German  emperor  at  this 

day,  ii.  285. 
/lufiria.  Spain  after  many  revolutions  came 

to  this,  i.   306. 
Princes  of  this  houfe  pretend  to  know 

their  original,  ii.    152. 
The  German  empire  came  to  Rodolphus 

of  this   name  about   300  Years  ago, 

ii.  154. 
"What  claim  this  houfe  has  to  the  crown 

of  France,  ii.  163,  270. 
^utberi  of  great  revolutions,    their  aims, 

i.  263. 
Axioms   in  law,    are   evident   to  common 

fenfe,  and  nothing  to  be  taken  lor  one 

that  is  not  (o,  ii.  222. 


B 


6. 


yJbeh  vid.  nation . 

Babylonian  kings,  what  right  is  pre- 
tended to  be  in  them,  i,  54,   55. 

Monarchy  rul'd  by  force,  the  ftronger 
turning  out  the  weaker,  i.  T90. 

How  its  pride  fell,  i.  203. 

Little  more  known  of  its  monarchy 
than  from  fcripture,  i.  334. 

Babylon  and  Sula  trembled  at  the 
motion  of   the  Grecian  arms,    i. 

373- 
There    were  a  people    there    before 

Nimrod  was  king,  ii.  207,  20S. 
Bahrce  of  power,    where  and   how  it  is 
broken,  i.  438.  ii.  311,  312. 
Nations   have    (ufFL-r'd   extremely   thro' 
want  of  this  prudence  in  rig'.tly  ba- 
lancing, &V.  ii,  338. 
In   wh.it  manner  power  fhould  be  bi- 
lanc'd  for  the  advantage  and  fervice 
rf  the  ftate,  ii.  361. 
Bar.ijhmentf  not  above   5   or   6   men  fuf- 
fer'd  unjullly   in  the  Romsn  govern- 
ment,   in   the   fpace   of   about    300 
*      years,  i.  211,  215,  254. 
The  temporary  of  that  Athenians  never 

accounted  as  a  puniiTiment,  i.  250. 
Camillas  recalPd  from  it,  and  afterwards 
honsur'd,  i.  252. 
Barbarorum  regna,  i.  416. 
BarWy  the  extent  of  the  name,  ii.  254, 

255,  260. 
BarBTifigiuv7f  what,  i<  14Q.  ii,  253,  455. 


Barthokmew  de  las  Cafas,  (a  SpanT(h  bi- 
fliop)  his  admirable  faying  concerning 
the  office  of  a  king,  i.  68. 

Baffompierre,  his  faying  about  Rochel,  1, 

397. 
Baftardsy    thpfe  children  can  inherit  no- 
thing, i.  156. 
Dedar'd  with  relation  to  crowns,  i.  160, 
Advanced  before  legitimate  brethren,  i. 
236.  237.  ii.  158,   159,  162,  279. 
In  fome  places  wholly  excluded,  i.  340. 
Beggars  of  a  king  to  Samuel,  fuch  as  would 
not  be  deny'd,  i.  180. 
Parliaments  no  beggars,  ii.  140,  141, 
Belial,  who  his  fons,  i.    183. 
Bellarmine's  tenents,  i.  7,  9,  20,  21,  24, 

.  -5»  37- 
Benjamites,  how  they  proceeded  in  prepar- 
ing for  their  defence,  i.  178, 
Bejl  men,  content  with  a  due  liberty  under 
the  protedion  of  a  juft  law,  i.  273, 
274.  ii.  172,  174. 
Have  ever  been  againft  abfolute  monar- 
chy, i.  277. 
Defpis'd,  hated  end  mark'd  out  for  de« 

ftruftion,  i.  395.  ii.  175. 
Have  their  affeftions  and  paflions,  and 
are  fubjeft  to  be  mifled  by  them,  i, 
4t6.  ii.  196. 
Were  fo  efleem'd  who  deftroy'd  tyranny, 

ii.  54. 
Whom  they  had  need  to  fear,  ii.  81. 
Can  never  wholly  diveft  themfelves  of 
paflions  and  affe£lions,  ii.  215. 
Birtk-n'gbt,    gives  no  right  to  fovereign 
dominion,  i.  149. 
Some  have  been  accus'd  of  fuppofititious 
births,  ii.  168. 
Bijbops,  the  king's  power  in  making  them, 
i.  382. 
What  words  of  fervitude  are  faid   to  be 
introduc'd  by  them  among  us,  ii.  98. 
Blake,    the  terror   his  fleet   ftruck   every 

where,  i.  402, 
Blood,  by   God's  law,  that  man's  is  to  be 
flied,  who  Hieds  anothers,  ii.  75,  76. 
The   neareft  in  blood  fet  afide,    when 
'twas  thought  more  convenient  to  ad- 
vance others,  ii.  156,   it7,  158. 
Boccalwiy    the    princes   of    Europe   angry 
with  him   for  his  definition  of  a  ty- 
rant, vid.    1   Cent.   76.     Advertife- 
ment,  i,  417. 
Bought  and  fold,  how  places  come  to  be  (0^ 

J-  367^  371. 
Senates  and  people  can't  fo  eafily  be,  i. 

368*  371-      ^     ^ 
BsurboHy  Henry  of   that  name,    rnit  ad- 
mitted to  the  crown  till  he  abjur'd  his 
religion,  and  promis'd  to  rule  by  law, 

I  4^5* 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


JSra^ott,  hJs  words,  Omnes  fub  eo,  Sc  ipfe 
fub  nullo,  &c.  how  to  be  underwood, 

"•  73>  75- 
What  he  calls  Efle  fub  lege,  ii.   112, 

121. 

What,  he  fays,  the  king  is  obJJg'd  to 
do  by  his  oath,  ii,229,  230. 

His  faying  about  evil,  or  unskilful  judges, 
ii.  230. 
Brethren,  all  fo  by  nature,  i.  44* 

Nature  abhors  a  difference  in  fpecie  be- 
tween them,  i.  126. 

Where  a  fraternal  equality  continu'd,  u 

132*   133; 
Are  equals,  i.  149. 
What  advanc'd  fome  above  the  reft,  i. 

172,  173- 
The  governed  {o   call'd,  by  their  ma- 

giftrates,  ii.  329. 

Bribery,   natural  to  courts,  i.   260,  26 1, 

36i»  3»3' 
Seeks  the  largcft  bidder,  1.  29S. 

Can't  corrupt,  where  virtue  is  prefer*d, 

i-  365- 
The  way  to  prevent  it,  1.  369,  370. 

A  noble  perfon  turn'd  out  of  a  confider- 

able  office,  as  a  fcandal  to  the  court, 

for  being  an  enemy  to  this  vice,  i. 

3^9- 
Parliaments  not  fo  eafily  to  be  prcvail'd 

upon,  ii.  376. 
Britain f  (hamefully  loft,  i.  22T. 

Kings  impos'd  upon  the  Britalns  by  the 

Romans,and  to  what  end,  ii.  10,  231. 
Severe  affertors  of  their  liberties,  ii.  211, 

241. 
Tho'   they  chofe  commanders  in  their 

wars,  yet  they  kept  the  government 

in  themfelves,  ii.  242. 
Ever  had  their  great  councils  to  determine 

their  msft  important  affairs,  ii.    245. 
Brutus,  found  it  dangerous  to  be  thought 

wife,  and  why,  i.  322,  342. 
Eftablifh'd  liberty  and  the  confulate  to- 
gether, ii.  184. 
Buchanan,  join'd  to  Doleman,  1.  7. 
His  character  of  K.  James  the  third,  i. 

422. 
Concerning  the  violation  of  the  laws  of 

Scotland,  ii.  119. 
Burgundy,  continu'd  in  Hugh  Capet's  eldeft 

fon  Robert,  and   his   defcendents  for 

ten  generations,  ii.  162, 


C. 


C'^JEfar,  of  giving  him  his  due,  i.  16, 
J  ii.  61. 

Julius  fubverted  all  order,  by  invading 
'   the  fupreme  roagiftracy   by  force,  i. 

205,  241.  ii.  63,  327. 
^oife  than  Tarquin,  i.  246, 


By  what  means  he  fet  up  his  tyranny,  f, 
261.  ii.  43. 
Cafar,  Julius,    fcarce   any  prince  had   fq 
many  good  qualities,  till  they  were  eJt- 
tinguifh'd  by  ambition,  i.  263. 
Defign'd  to  make  himfelf  a  tyrant, 

i.  269. 
Thought  all  things  lawful,  when  the 
confulate  was  deny'd  him,  i.    336. 
When  the  power  of  the  Romaps  was 

expreft  by  this  name,  ii.  62. 
Had  a  diadem  offer'd  him  by   Mar^C 

Anthony,  li.  97. 
How  obfervant  he  was  of  his  word, 

when  taken  by  pyrats,  ii.  142. 
The  ftate  of  the  Roman  empire  after 

his  ufurpation,  ii,  188. 
Auguftus  his  power  not  given,    but 

ufurp'd,  ii.  205,  206. 
Julius,  what  account  he  gives  of  our 

affairs  here,  ii.   210,  241. 
When,  if  ever,  fear  enter'd  into  his 
heart,  ii.  242. 
Cafars,  never  call'd  kings  till  the  6th  age 
of  chriftianity,  ii.  284. 
Julius,  in  defpair  would  have  kill'd  him- 
felf, ii.  327. 
Cam,  had  no  dominion  over  his  brethren 
after  Adam's  death,  i.  120. 
From  whence  his  fear  (that  every  man 
would  flay  him)  proceeded,  ii,  7. 
Caligula,  his  wifh  that  the  people  had  but 
one   neck,    i.  20,    loi,  322,  380. 
ii.  332. 
A  moijfter  of  mankind,  i.   53.  ii.  116. 
His  making  love  to  the  moon,  J.  86. 
His  expedition,  when  he  faid,  he   had 

fubdu'd  the  fea,  i.  221. 
Valerius  Afiaticus  appeas'd  the  guards, 
by  faying,  he  wi/h'd  he  had  been  the 
man  had  kill'd  him,  i.  32?.  ii.  117. 
Murder'd  by  his  own  guards,  i.  332. 
Affeded   the  title  of  being  call'd  God, 
which   Claudius  Caefar  calls  Turpenn 
caii  infaniam,  i,  411. 
vid.  ii.  97. 
Whofe  minifier  he  might  be  faid  to  be, 

ii.  91. 
Saidof  him, that  no  man  ever  knew  a  bet- 
ter fervant,nor  a  worfe  mafter,  ii.  lo2. 
Wherein  he  plac'd  his  fovereign  majefly, 
ii.  189. 
Calvin,  his  opinion  of  the  government  in- 

ftituted  by  God,  i.  170,   176. 
Camden,    his   credit    forfeited   by   a  gr?at 

number  of  untruths,  ii.  252. 
Ca,tnpus  Martini,  was  the  land  that  be- 
long'd  to  the  kings  of  Rome  (noc 
above  ten  acres)  afterwards  confecrat- 
ed  to  Mars,  ii.  49. 
Cardinals,  the  refpeft  piid  them,  who  have 
the  power  of  chufinj popes,  i.   128. 

Carthage, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Carthage,  how  ffie  grew  to  that  excefs  of 
power  that  only  Rome  was  able  to 
overthrow,  i.  230,  290. 
One  of  the  moft  potent  cities  in  the 
world,  i.  291. 
Cajiile,  the  lords  thereof  had  no  other  title 
for   many  ages  than   that  of  Count, 
which  was  afterwards  chjng'd  to  that 
of  king,  without  any  addition  to  the 
power,  ii.  286. 
Concerning  the  ftates  thereof  erring,  ii, 
322. 
Catifine,  his  temper,  i.  232. 

One  of  the  lewdcft  men  in  the  world, 
i.  261. 
CeJJet  ProccJfuSy  faid  to   be  annex'd  to  the  ' 

perfon  of  the  king,  ii.  355. 
Ceylon,  an  ifland  in  the  Eaft-Indies,  where 
the  king  knows  no  law  but  his  own 
will,  ii.  364. 
Change,    of  government,  no  proof  of  ir- 
regularity or  prejudice  to  it,  by  thofc 
that  have  right,  i.  209,  247. 
Nothing  found  more  orderly,  i.  236. 
A  mortal  one  in  root  and  principle,  u 

241. 
In  government  unavoidable,  i.  244. 
"What  changes  deferve  praife,  i.  245. 
Where  the   wifdom   of  it  is  fhewn,  i. 

246. 
Where  they  are  requifite  fometimes,  ii. 

216. 
What  are  for  the  worfe,  ii.  312. 
Chatt(r  of  liberty,  not  from  men,  but  from 
God,  ii.  289. 
Parliaments  interpos'd  their  authority  in 
thefe  matters,  ii.  319. 
Chatham,  the  city  of  London's  dread  at  the 
Dutch  fleet's  burning  our  fhips  there, 
i.  297. 
Cheat  of  Mnrio    Chigi,  brother  of  Alex- 
ander VII.  upon  the  fale  of  corn^  i. 
377-  ji-  10." 
Ct/W  or  children,  a  wife  one,  Eccl.  4.  13. 
i.  50,  86,  166,  405.  ii.  70. 
Their  duty  is  pe.petual,  i.  93,   119.  ii. 

Of  God  and  of  the  Devil,  i,  97,   loi. 

If  children  then  heirs,  i.  125. 

Wo  to  thee,  O  land,  when  thy  king  is 
a  child  !  i.  127,   163. 

On  what  account  children  are  admitted 
to  rule,  i.  164. 

What  underftood  by  the  word  child,  i. 
166. 

They  do  not  always  prove  like  their  pa- 
rents, i.  370.  ii.  120. 
Children,  the  danger  of  having  them  to  be 
king?,  i.  406. 

The  law  gives  them   relief  againft  the 
feveritics  gf  their  parents,  ii.  9. 


V/"ere  punifh'd  with  death,  and  for  what, 
ii.  9. 
Chrifiiamty,    has    been   fplit   into   variety 
of  opinions,  ever  fince  it  was  preach'd, 
i.  292. 
The  firft  profeflbrs  were  of  the  meaneft 

of  the  people,  ii.  89. 
St.  Paul's  work  was  to  preferve  the 
profeflbrs  of  it  from   errors  con- 
cerning the  ftate,  ii.  90, 
Sufficiently  prov'd    to  be   antient,  if 
prov'd  to  be  good  and  true,  ii.  213. 
Cities,  confift  of  equals,  i.  105,   1I2. 

What  makes  them  free,  ii.  289.  i 

Ci'vcs,  V.  incolae, 
Ci-vi/wsT,  V.  war, 
Cleanthes,  his  philofophical  reply  to  Arl- 

flippus,  about  Hattery,  i.  364. 
^^^''gyt   the  veneration  our  anceftors  had 

for  them,  ii.  250. 
ColleBori,  their  extortions,  i.  375. 
Commanders^     after    the    captivity,    who 
thought  moft  fit,  i.  46. 
Of  armies,  who  beft  to  be  made  fo, 

i.  106. 
The  beft  among  the  Greeks  and  Ro- 
mans  in   their   times,    would    not 
know  how  to  manage  an  army  now, 
ii.  310,   311. 
Where  they  have  been  put  to  death 
for  misbehaviour,  <S?'c.  ii.  320. 
Commands  of  a  mafter,  how  far   the  fer- 
vant  is  bound  to  obey  them,  &c% 
ii.  379,   380. 
Commijfton,  from  God,  what,  i.  98. 

They  who  hereby  grant  authority, 
do  always  retain  more  than  they 
give,  ii.  217,  373. 
Ctmitia  Centuriata,  what,  ii.  109. 
Commons,  whether  they  had  a  part  in  the 
government,  ii.  24S. 
Always  had  a  place  in  the  councils 

that  manag'd  it,  ii.  250. 
Many  of  them  in  antiquity  and  emi- 
nency,  little   inferior   to  the  chief 
of  the  titular    nobihty,    ii.  251, 
258. 
The    nation's  ftrength  and  virtue  in 

them,  ii.  258. 
How  all  things  have  been  brought  in- 
to the  king's  and   their   hand,  ii, 

313- 
Yet  never  can  be  united  to  the  court, 

"•  3n-  

Have  refus'd  to  give  their  opinions  in 
many  cafes,  till  they  had  confulted 
with  thofe  that  fent  them,  ii.  320. 
Ccmmon-ivealths,  for  what  end  inftituted, 
i.  2. 
All  the  regular  kingdoms  in  the 
world  aie  fo,  i.  37,  104. 


Of 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Of  Italy,  not  without  valour  and  vir- 

tue^  i.  226. 
How  they   feek  peace  and  war,   i. 

286. 
Whether  better  to  conftitute  one  for 

war  or  trade,  i.  290. 
Another  fort  compos'd  of  many  cities 

afTociated  together,  and  living  aquo 

jure,  i.  292. 
Seldom  advance  women,  children,  or 

fuch  like,  to  the  fupreme  power, 

J-  357- 
In  them  all  men  fight  for  themfelves, 

i.  360. 
When   the  laws   are   aboiiih'd,    the 

name  alfo  ceafcs,  i.  360. 
Lefs  /laughter  in   thefe,  than  in]  ab- 

folute  kingdoms,  i.  373. 
Of    Greece    and    Italy,    why    call'd 

nurferies  of  virtue,  i.  37S. 
Juflice  very  well  adminifter'd  in  them, 

ii.  79. 
How  they  may  be  fav'd  from  ru;n. 

Competitors,  fovereigns  do  impatiently  bear 
them,  i.  34. 
Where  their  own  fvvords  have  decided 

their  difputes,  i.  312,   341. 
Ccntefts  between  them  relating  to  the 
crown,   are  often  very  bloody,  I, 

344,  347,  348,  352,  353,  354> 

3S5.  356,  359.  360. 
Compulfion  j  he  that  will  lufter  himfelf  to 

be  compel'd,  knows  not  how  to  die, 

i.  95. 
(anqueft,  what  is  fo  call'd,  i,  39,  62,  63. 
William   I.    had  the  name  of  Con- 
queror odioufly  given  to  him,    i. 

145. 
The  extent  thereof  not  the  only  thing 

to  be  confider'^d,  i.  220,  221. 
Some  common-wealths  hereby  defign'd 

to  enlarge  their  territories,  i.  2S2. 
Some   conquerors  never    deferv'd  the 

name  of  ufurpers,  ii.  77. 
The  king  can't  difpcfe  of  a  conquered 

country,    becaufe   'tis  annex'd    to 

the  office,  ii,  26S. 
'Tis    the  people    that  conquer,    not 

any  one  man  by  his  own  ftrength, 

ii.  282. 
Confcicncey  how  it  ought  to  be  regulated, 

ii.  94. 
Conjent    general,    to    refign  part    of   their 

liberty  for  the  good  of  all,  is  the 

voice  of  nature,  i.  19,   39,  271. 
Firft  confer'd  power,  i,  33,   37,  62, 

133'   I34»   162. 
Government   arifes    from  it,    i.   €3, 

66,   134,  146,  444,  44.7. 
The  right  of  m:!giiirates  eflentially  de- 


pends upon  it,  I.  T46,  147,  416* 
ii.  153,  198,  209. 
None  to  tyrannies,  i.  147. 
No  compleat  lawful  power  without  it, 

i.  1^0,   162,  277,  315. 
Of  the  three  eftates  in  many  places 

requir'd,  to  pafs  a  law,  i.  434. 
Whatfoevcr  proceeds  not  from  it,  mud 
be  de  fadlo  only,  ii.  28  3. 
Ccnftantine  the  great,  with  what  blood  he 
was  polluted,  i,  343,  437. 
His  power   kept    up    hereditary,    but 
with   extreme    confufion    and   dif- 
order,  i.  447. 
Conjiituticns  of  every  government  to  whom 
refer'd,  i.  63. 
Human    fubjeft   to    corruption,    and 
therefore  to  be  reduc'd  to  their  firft 
principles,  i.  210. 
Where  new  ones  are  necefiarily  re- 
quir'd, i.  244. 
That  the  beft,  which  is  attended  with 

the  leaft  inconveniencies,  i.  254. 
Who    endeavours    the    fubverfion  of 

them,  i.  274.  ii.  314. 
Of  common-wealths  various,  i.  2S7. 

ii.  280. 
Of  the  northern  nations  that  invaded 

the  Roman  empire,  i.  289. 
The    temper  of  that  of  tha  United 

Provinces,  i.  294. 
Good  ones  remain,  tho'  the  author* 

of  them  perifh,  i.  300. 
The  falutary  ones  made  by  m.en,  God 

approves  and  ratifies,  ii.  83. 
Of  a  ftate  aims  at  perpetuity,  ii.  107. 
Are  madefor  and  by  the  people, 11.183, 
What  the  imperfe(5tions  of  all  human 

conftitutions,  ii.  215. 
Our  antient,  has  been   wholly  invert- 
ed, ii.  257. 
What  are  moft  to  be  commended,'  ii. 

308,  336.  _ 
Of  no  value,  if  there  be  not  a  power 
to  fupport  them,  ii.  308. 
Confuls,  made  of    Plebeians,    how  feldom 
chofen,   and  with  what  prudence, 
i.  210. 
Reprefented  kings,    and  were  veftedi' 
with   equal   power,    i.   234,  238. 
ii.  loi,  293. 
Were  created  after  the  expulGon   of 
Tarquin,  i.  245,  437. 
Conjulsy  flrangers  rais'd  to  that  honour,  i. 
288. 
.  Tho'  fupreme  in  power,  yet  fubjeft 
to  the  people,  i.  317,  452.  ii.  46. 
Marius  continu'd  5  Years  in  the  office, 

i,  437. 
Only  for  a  year,  i.  4t;2. 
Title  of  dread   fovereign  might  juftfy 
have  been  given  to  them,  ii.  293. 

H 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE; 


Jf  they  grew  infoknt,  how  they  might  be 
reduc'd,  ii.  309. 
ContraBiy  how  fram'd  between  naticrrs  and 
their  kings,  ii.  14,   34,   36,   303. 
Vid.  judges,  nations,  original. 
Enter'd  into  by  princes  before  their  in- 

vediture,  ii.  S8. 
The  breaking  them  overthrows  all  fo- 

cieties,  ii.  141. 
in  writing,  faid  to  be  Invented  only  to 

bind  villains,  and  why,  ii.  142. 
All  are  mutual,  and  whoever  fails  of  his 
part  difcharges  the  other,  ii.    148. 
Contran'orum  contrarii  eft  ratio,  ii.  gr. 
Contioverjies,  with  other  nations,  the  de- 
cifion  of  them   kft  to  judges  chofen 
by  mutual  agreement,  ii.    345. 
Cofiolufius  duly  condemn'd  by  the  Romans, 

i.  251. 

Coronation  oath,  i.  149,   151,    162,   163. 

Norman  kings  oblig'd  to  take  it,  ii.  73. 

How  far  our  kings  are  oblig'd  to  obferve 

137,     141,    144,    146, 


:)?' 


It,     11.    I 

147,    148,    226,    296. 


Whether  thofe  of  the  king  are  C3?pos'(J 
to  punifliments,  and  for  what>  ii.  357, 

385. 
Council  of  feventy  chofen  men,  i.  175. 

God's  counfels  are  impenetrable,  i,  203, 

A  wife  and  good  one  cannot  always  fup- 
ply  the  defe£ts,  or  correal  the  vic6s  of  a 
young  or  ill-difpos'd  prince,  ii.  129. 

Where  it  is  of  no  ufe  unlefs  princes  are 
oblig'd  to  follow  it,  ii.  131. 

Of  Toledo,  what,  it  made  the  prince  to 
fwear  before  he  was  plac'd  in  the 
royal  feat,  ii.  165. 

Of  what  perfons  it  antiently  confifted, 
ii.  252,  253,   318. 

General,  how  expreft  antiently  by  au- 
thors, ii.  261. 

When  the  boldeft  are  mofl:  fafe,  ii    340. 

The  king  is  oblig'd  to  adV,  cqm  mag- 
natum  &  fapientum  confilio,  ii.  358. 

He  can  fpeak  only  by  their  advice,  and 
every  man  of  them,  is  with  his  head 
to  anfwer  for  the  advice  he  gives,  ii; 
3S5- 


Corporaiiotis,  or  bodies  politick,  what  places     Council-Table^    the  proceedings  and  jurjf- 


were    thought   fit     by   the   king    and 

council  to  be  made  fo,  ii.  318. 
Corruption,    natural    to    courts,    inftances 

given,  i.  260,  &€.  267,   361, 
Of  minifters  in  foreign  courts,  i.  280. 
The  effeft  of  that  which   proceeds  from 

the  government  in  particular  inftances, 

i.  305.  ii.  349. 
Of  a  people  tends  to  tyranny,  i.  327. 
Makes  princes  titles  good,  and  how,  i, 

333-. 
Where  it  certainly  mod  abounds,  i.  360, 

363,  367. 

Muft  always  be  oppos'd  by  free  govern- 
ments, and  v.'hy,  i.  363,   367. 

The  bafeft,  but  moft  lucrative  traffick, 
.i.  367. 

In  the  head,  muft  necefTarily  difFufe  it- 
felf  into  mofl  of  the  members  of  the 
common-wealth,  i.  36S,   399. 

A  jull  prince  that  will  hear   his  peoples 

complaints  himfelf,  prevents  it,  i.  371. 

Corruption^  rooted   in  the  very  principle  of 

ahfolute  monarchy,  which  cannot  fub- 

fift  without  it,  i.  370,   371. 

Mankind  naturally  propenfe  to  it,  ii.  48. 

Of  judgment  proceeds  from  private  paf- 
fions,  ii.  116. 

Of  members  01  parliament,  ii.  379. 
Cuun  fellers y  made  choice  of  according  co  the 
temper  of  the  prince,  i.  14,   388,  ii, 
129,  130, 

Signify  Httie  to  an  abfolote  monarch,  i. 
280,   306. 

In  the  multitude  of  them  generally  is 
fafety,  ii,  321, 


diflion  of  it  regulated  by  17  Car.  i, 
cap.  X.  ii.  237. 
Courtiers  i  what  things  are  infeparable  fromf 
their  lives,  i,  368. 

Their  phrafe  is,  To  make  as  much  pro- 
fit of  their  places  as  they  can,  i,  368. 

A  wiie  prince's  faying  to  fome  about  him 
of  fuch,  i.  369. 

Wherein  their  art  confifts,  i.  383.  ii, 
360. 

The  modern  ones  by  their  names  arri 
titles,  what  they  are  apt  to  put  us  in 
mind  of,  ii,  2.5 r. 

When  they  fpeak  moH^  truth,  ii.  295. 

Of  Philip  III.  and  IV.  of  Spain,  thei^ 
fottifhnefs,  ii.  316. 
Coivards,  the  cruelleft  of  men,  5.  412. 
Crown,  how  the  Englifh  became  heredita- 
ry, i.  156,   160. 
Croivn,  chang'd   from  one  family  to  ano- 
ther by  the  eftates  of  the  realm,  i. 
237.  V.  ii.  I,  2,  159,  161,  238,239. 

Comprehends  all  that  can  be  grateful  to 
the  mofl  violent  and   vit^jus,  i.  335.' 

Hereditary  or  elc£tive,  it  has  its  defcdts, 
i    "  "o 

The  Spartan  tranfported  into  nine  feveraF 
families,  i.  420. 

Of  France,  is  from  the  people,  i.  42 ^y 

Where  none  would  accept  it,  but  fuch 
as  did  not  deferve  it,  J.  437. 

Arminius  flain  for  aiming  at  one,  il« 
100. 

Of  England,  upon  what  conditions  ac- 
cepted, ii.  144,    T45. 

Five  different  manners  of  difpofing  crowns 
eftcem'd  hereditary,  ii.  149. 

Of 


An  Alphabetical  T  A  B  L  E. 


Of  Spain  not  fix'd  in  a  line,  but  difposM 

of  as  the  nobility  and  people  thought 

fit,  ii.  157. 
Many  and  bloody  contcfts  for  one,  ii. 

198,  298,  299. 
The  demeafns  of  it  cannot  be  alienated, 

ii.  268. 
The   parliament's  power   of  giving  and 

taking  it  away,  ii.   299. 
Some  have  /ear'd  the  luftre  of  it,  ii. 

337.  ■  .        , 

He  that  wears  it  can  t  determine   the 

affairs   which  the  law  refers   to  the 

king,  ii.  352,  357. 
Curioy  bv  corruption  made  an  mfirument 

of  mifchlef,  who  had  been  an  eminent 

fupporter  of  the  laws,  i.  264. 
Cuftom,  the  authority  of  it,  as   well  as  of 

law,  confjfls  only  in  its  reflltude,  ii. 

211,  212. 
The  various  ones  us'd  in  eledlion,  ii. 

3I7>  319- 
Had  its  beginning  and  continuance  from 

the  univerfal  confent  of  the  nation. 


II. 


359 


Of  Barnewelt,    and   de    Wit,'  i.    294, 

295- 
Often  the  reward  of  fuch  fervices  as  Can't 

be  fufficiently  valu'd,  i.  342. 

Of  the  neareft  relations,  regnandi  caufa, 

i-  345- 
The  bitternefs  of  it,  how  affwsg'd,  i, 

439- 
Very  few   fuiTer'd  in   Sparta   for  above 

800  Years,  ii.  85. 
Dccermjiri,  only  for  a  year,  i.  240. 
For  two  years,  ii.  114. 
To  regulate  (he  law,   i.  245.  ii.  109, 
Patricians  favour'd  them,  i.  310. 
Proceeded  againft  as  private  men,  when 

they  continu'd   beyond  their  time,  i. 

316. 
Us'd  with  great  gentlenefs,  i.  359. 
The  Romans  eahJy  beaten-  under  them, 

i.  400. 
The  power  given  to  them,  fine  provo- 

catione,  was  only  in  private  cifes,  ii. 

114. 
Why  the  people    deHroy'd    both  their 

power  and  them,  ii.  114. 


The  reafon  why  we   pay  cuftoms,    ii.     Dedfton  of  the  moft  difficult  matters,  an 


382. 


D. 


DAvld,  the  moft  reverend  king,   had 
his  pofterity  depriv'd,  and  his  king- 
dom at  la  ft  came  to  the  Afmonean 
race,  i.  46,  47. 
Chofe  and  anointed  king  by  the  tribe  of 

Judah,  i.  163.  ii.  22. 
Slew  the  fons  of  Rimmon,  and  why, 
i.  163. 


tiently  left  to  the  prielis  in  all  coun- 
tries, ii.  346. 
In  England,  where  made  bv  iadges  and 
juries,  and  where  by  parliaments,  ii, 

357,^35^- 
Dij^ncs^  aii  terminates  in  force,  i.  299, 
-  300. 

Whether  better  for  every  man  to  ftard 
in  his  own  defence,  than  to  enter  in- 
to focieties,  J.  324. 
Of  one's  {t\i,  natural,  ii.  32,    59. 
Delatores,  fee  Roman  empire,  i,  204. 


Not  without  his  infirmities  and  punl/L-    Delegated  peiCons,  their  powers,  to  whom 


ments,  1.  192. 
David,  who  were  his  followers,  notwith- 

ftanding  the  juftice  of  his  caufe,  ii. 

22.  i.  329. 
His  atfeftion  towards  his  people,  ii.  9. 
His  refifting  cf  Saul,  without  afTuming 

the  power  of  a  king,  ii.  t8,   19,  20. 
How  his  heart  fmote  him  when  he  had 

cut  off  Saul's  skirt,  ii.  20. 
His  war  with  Saul,  how  grounded,  ii. 

21. 

There  were  many  rebellions  againft  hin), 
ii.  24,  25. 


refer'd,  i.  137,   140,    143. 
In  general  aflVmblies,  i.  143. 
How  binding  the  adls  of  luch  are  to  the 

whole  nation,  i.  146. 
Where  the  king  ads  by  this  power,  ii. 

358. 
Can  have  no  power  but  what  is  ronfer'd 

on  them  by  their  principals,  ii.  367. 
How  thofe  in  the  United  Provinces,  and 

in  Switzerland  are  us'd,  ii,  369. 
Deputies  cf  Caftile,  refus'd   in  the  Cor- 

tez  to  give  Charles  V.  the  fupplies  he 

defir'd,  and  why     ii.  373« 


How  he  fear'd  men  more  than  God,  ii.    Deliverers  of  their  countries  from  oppi'ef- 


43- 
Why  he  commanded   Solomon    not   to 

fuffer  Joab  to  go  to  the  grave  in  peace, 

ii.  84. 

Wife  as  an  angel  of  God,  ii.  322. 

Death,  of  no  eminent  Roman,  except  one, 

for  a  long  time,  i.  211. 


lions,  how   they  have  been  elieem'd 

in  all  ages,  i.  15. 
What  gifts  God  beRowM  on  them,  i. 

50,   172,   1S7,   203.  _ 
Often  rewarded  wiih  inheritances,  i.  137. 
Their  a«Stions  carry  their  own  juftifica- 

tion,   i.  325. 


Citizens  to  be  condemn'd  in  publick  by    Democracy,  God  faid  to  be  the  author  of 


the  Roman  law,  i.  257, 


It,  1.  21,  179. 


Perfea, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


PctteO.,  what,  i.  38. 

For  whom  beft,  i.  107,   176,  233. 

How  inftituted,  i.  117. 

A  democratical  embafTy,  i.   175,   176, 

Of  the  Hebrew  government,  i,  176. 

Never  good  but  in  fmall  towns,  i.  233, 
247,  248. 

Pure,  If  it  be  in  the  world,  the  author 
has  nothing  to  fay  to  it,  i.  2 6S. 

"Where  it  would  prove  the  moft  juft,  ra- 
tional and  natural,   i.  272, 

To  what  miftakes  moft  liable,  i.  310. 

With  whom  in  a  ftridl  fenfe  it  can  only 
fuit,  i.  432. 
Denmark,  the  la  ft  king  thereof  overthrew 
in  one  day  all  the  laws  of  his  country, 
i.  265. 

The  crown  elective  till  1660,  and  then 
made  hereditary,  ii.  153,  279. 

In  fome  parts  thereof  the  whole  vo- 
lumes of  their  laws  may  be  read  in 
few  hours,  ii.  222. 

The  authority  of  their  kings  faid  to  have 
been  for  above  3000  years,  ii.  241. 

Nobleman  and  gentleman  the  fame  there, 
ii.  255. 
Depofition  of  princes,  faid  to  be  the  doc- 
trine of  Rome  and  Geneva,  i.  7. 
Depofition  for  mifgovernment,  and  others 
plac'd  in  their  rooms,  i.  139,  160, 
236,  237,  405,  424.  ii.  23,  105, 
an,  317. 

Kings,  when  deposed,  lofe  the  right  of 
fending  ambafladors,  ii.  353. 

The  praflice  of  France  and  other  coun- 
tries, i.  160,  242,  348,  353,  40S. 
ii.  15X,  159,  160,    161,   163,  258. 

For  religion  differing  from  the  body  of 
the  nation,  i,  160,   165,  237. 

If  they  become  enemies  to  their  people, 
i.  323. 

For  their  ill  lives,  ii.  88,  89. 

Of  Wamba,  a  gothick   king,  who  was 
made  a  monk   after  he  had  reign'd 
many  years  well,  ii.  157. 
Deffrtion^  the  caufe  of  it,  i.  280. 

Common  to  all  abfolute  monarchies,  i, 
2S0. 

Of  foldiers,  5.  398,  400,  40I. 
Defur  Digniori,  i.  48,  49,   67,    107. 
D:cijtor,  from  whence  his  power  arofe,  i, 
21 T.  ii.  46. 

Cfffar  made  himfelf  perpetual,  i.  217. 

Made  occa(ionally  at  the  beginning,  i, 
240,  241,  246. 

A  mortal  change  in  root  and  principle, 
i.  241. 

"Why  Mamercus  and  others  had  this  hon- 
our, i.  252,  393. 

Tho'  fupreme,  yet  fubjeft  to  the  people, 
if  they  tranfgreft  the  law,  i.  3I7;450. 
ii.  294. 


His  power  but  for  fix  months  at  mofi, 
i.  452.  ii.  loi,  114. 

Camillus  in  his  fourth  di£tatorlhip  threa- 
ten'd  with  a  fine,  i.  452. 

The  commiflion  that  was  given  them, 
what,  ii.  278. 

How  high  the  Romans  carry*d  the  power 
and  veneration  due  to  them,  ii.  294. 

None  ever  ufurp'd  a  power  over  liberty 
till  the  time  of  Sylla,  ii.  305?. 
Diets,  vid.  eftates  of  the  realm,  and  par- 
liaments.    General  aflemblies. 
Difference  between  a  lawful  king  and  ty- 
rant, i.  122,  126,  410.  ii.  52,  127. 

Between  brethren,  only  in  proportion, 
i.  126. 

Between  lord  and  fervant  in  fpecie,  not 
in  degree,  i.  126. 

Between  men  fighting  for  their  own  in- 
tereft,  and  fuch  as  ferve  for  pay,  i. 
398. 

Between  fenates  and  abfolute  princes,  i. 

445- 
Difference   between  magiftrates    to    whom 

obedience  is  due,  and  to  whom  not, 

ii.  95,  97. 
Between  good  and  bad  princes,  is  from 

the  obfervation    or  violation    of   the 

laws  of  their  country,  ii.  106. 
Diock/ians  faying.  Bonus,  cautus,  sptimu? 

imperator  venditur,  i.  362. 
What  made  him  renounce  the  empire,  i. 

362. 
Dionyfiui,  his  tyranny  deftrcy'd  by  the  Sy~ 

racufians,  i.  20. 
His  charafter,  i.  53,  384,  385. 
Diogenes  his  faying  of  him,  i.  38 5. 
Dijcipline,  the  excellency  of  the  Roman, 

i.  258,  159,  284. 
The  like  in  all  nations  that  have  kept 

their  liberty,  i.  2S5. 
The  effe£ts  of  good  and  bad,   i.   393, 

395>  397- 
The  excellency  of  the  Spartan,  1.  420. 

ii.  85. 

Difpenfmg  power,   our  kings  have  it  not 

beyond  what   the  law  gives  them,  ii,   • 

200. 
Diffmulation,  whnt,  i.  4^7- 
DiffJute  perfons  fitteft  fubie(fts  fur  abfolute 

monarchs,  i.  169,   262,  327. 
Abhor  the  dominion  of  the  law,  i.  270, 

388. 
DoBrine;  fome  by  that  which  is  falfe,  poi- 

fon  the  fprings  of  religion  and  virtue, 

ii.  176. 
Dominion,    equally    divided    among   all,  is 

univerfal  liberty,   i.  42. 
Of  the  whole  world  can't  belong  to  one 

man,  i.  73,  78. 
Nor    ever   a    nation,   ever   infeparably 

I 

united 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


united  to  one  rtian  and  bis  family,  i. 

105,  126,   127,  13Z,  150. 
Deeds  by  which  the  right  of  it  is  con- 

fer'd,  i.  162. 
Ufurp'd  by  the  ruin  of  the  beft  p^rt  of 

mankind,  i.  261. 
Of  France  not  to  be  alienated,  i.  427. 
Every  child  of  a  parent  c^n't  inherit  it, 

i.  44.1. 
How,  and  by  whom  it  was  confer'd,  i. 

442.  ii.  2S6. 
.   Implies  protedion,  ii.  290. 
Dominus,   its  fignification,  i.  123. 

The  Romans  often  cali'd  lords  of  the 

world,  ii.  259. 
bomitiar,,  his  charader,  i.  3S0. 
Tacitus  calls  him  an  enemy   to  virtue, 

ii.  Si. 
Duels  in   France,    who  only   could   refufe 

challenges   from   any    gentleman,    ii. 

..255' 
JDukes  of  Venice,  Mofcovy,  &c.  i.   320. 

Duke,  earl  and  vicount,  the  names  of 

offices,  ii.  26S. 
Where    thefe   names  are   fubjefls,    and 

where  little  lefs  than   fovereigns,  ii. 
.       a86. 
Duty,  arifing  from  a  benefit  receiv'd,  mufl 

be  proportionable  to  ic,  ii,  12. 
Of  a  magii^rate,  whH,  ii.  Si. 
Of  no  man  to  deny  any  one  that  which 

is  his  due,  much  kfs  to  oppofe  the 

minifter  of  God  in  the  exercife  of  his 

office,  ii.  91. 
What  to  be  expe£led  from;  a.ld  render 'd 

to  them,  ii.  loz. 


E. 


EAftern  nations  what  remarkable  for,  i. 
168. 
Force  is  the  prevailing  law  with  thenrt,  i. 

190. 
Were  and  are  ftjll  under  the  government 
of  thcfe,  whom    all  free  people  call 
tyrants,  ii.  54,   184. 
Solomon's  prudent  advice  to  private  per- 
foDS  living   under   the  government  of 
thefe  countries,  ii.  69. 
Edivard  II.  imprilbn'd  and  depos'd  by  his 
parliament,  ii.  375. 
IV.   his  wants  fupply'd  by  fraud  and  ra- 
pine, ii.   3S6. 
E/e^ion,  moft  princes  chofen  by  the  people, 
i.  137,  138,  139,  i49>  165. 
Prov'd  from  fcripture  inftance?,   i.  139, 

144,  149,   163,   164,   176.  ii.    18, 

21. 

From   examples  of  the  Saxons,  i.  144, 

145.  ii.  S7,  88,  252,  253. 
Makes  a  right,  i.  147,   loz,   163, 


The  various  ways  of  elefting  princes,  i, 

236. 
Frequent  chufing  of   magiftrates  makes 

nurferlei  of  great  and  able  men,  i, 

284,  301,   390. 
The  prucence  of  eledion  furpalTes  the 

accidents  of  birth,  i.  303. 
Of  kings    in   France,  i.  425,  426.  ii. 

159,    160,   161. 
Of  Charles  Guftavus   to  the  crown  of 

Sweden,  ii.  277. 
The  various  cuftcms  us'd  in  chufing  par» 

liament-men,  ii.  317,  318. 
EhBiije  kingdoms,  ii.  155. 
Elisiabeth,    queen,    her   government,    not 

without   fome  mixture   of  blood,   i, 

3  57- 
Ehxabeth,  what  power  made  h?r  capable 

of  the  fuccefiion,  ii.  169,  273. 
Her  character  and  failings,  ii.  195,   196. 
The  e3rl  of  Morton  fent  amb-iflador  to 

her  by  the  eftatcs  of  Scotland,  to  juf- 

tify  their  proceedings  againft  Q.  Mary, 
^ii,  341. 
None  fo  much  imitated  Henry  V,  as  fhe, 

ii.  389. 
Eminent,  the  tnoft,  ought  only  to  be  ad- 

vanc'd  to  places  of  publick  truft  and 

dignity,   i.  66,   67,    116,    I17. 
Moft  obnoxious  to  be  taken  off,  i.  213, 

255,  256,   385. 
Are  moft  fear'd,  1.  342,    347. 
V/hen  tliefe  are  moft  impatient,  i,  347, 
The  pillars  of  every  ftate,  i.  347, 
Emperors,  Roman,  three  or  four,  and   at 

one  time  thirty,    who  cali'd  them- 

felves  by  this  name,  i.  242. 
Endeavour'd  to  make   their  power  he- 
reditary, i.  446. 
The  height  of  their  regal  majefty,  II, 

28,  29. 
St.    Auftin's,  and  Ulpian's  faying,  that 

they  were  fubjedl  to  no  law  and  why, 

ii.  68,   193. 
Some  foully  polluted  themfelves  with  in- 
nocent blocd,  ii.  92. 
The  title   never    folemnly    afTjm'd    by, 

nor  confer'd  on  them,  ii,  97,  98. 
Theodofius  confeft,  it  was   the  glory  of 

a  good  one  to  own  himfelf  bound  by 

law  ,  ii.  193. 
The  prefent  one  in  Cermnny,  an  ac- 
count of  him,  ii.  323,   324. 
Empire,  grounded  on  the  pope's  donation, 

i.  68. 
Gain'd  by  violence  is  meer  tyranny,  i, 

Acquir'd  by  virtue,  can't  long  be  fup- 

ported  by  money,  i.  206, 
The  calamines  which  the  Roman  fuf- 

fer'd,  i.  246. 
Settled  in  Germany,  i.  320, 

D  d  Ernpire, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Etnpire,  what  made  Dioclefian  to  renounce 

the  empire,  i.  362. 
Under   what  fort  of  governors  it  was 

ruin'd,  i.  39a. 
Of  the  world  divided  between  God  and 

Caefar,  ii.  179,  593,  445. 
Not  oblig'd   by  any   ftipulation  of   the 

emperor  without  their  confent,ii,  353. 


been  the  eaufe  of  our  late  difficulties, 

ii.  239. 
Our  fecurity,  the  beft  anchor  we  have, 

ought  to  be  preferv'd  with  all  care,  ii. 

381. 
The  general  impairing  of  her  may  be 

dated  from  the  death  of  Henry  the 

fifth,  ii.  3S6. 


Ena^inghv/s,  continu'd  in  the  people  of    Epaminondat y  forfeiture  of  his  life  (tho* 


Rome,  i.  210,  220. 
Enemy  of  a  nation,  who,  i.  66,  315,  378, 

385- 
Every  man  is  a  foldier  againft  him,  i. 

3"- 
"Who  the  moft  dangerous  to  fupreme  ma- 

giftrates,  i,  324.  ii.  170. 
Who  is  fo  to  all  that  is  good,  i.  363. 
Who  is  fo  to  virtue  and  religion,  is  an 

enemy  to  mankind,  i.  378,  383. 
Thofe  that  know  they  have  fuch  abroad, 

endeavour  to  get  friends  at  home,  ii. 

Sycophants  the  worft  enemies,  ii.  134, 

389.  . 

How  a  king  declares  he  has  none  when 
he  comes  to  the  crown,  ii.  199. 

A  prince  that  feeks  affiftance  fium  fo- 
reign powers,  is  fo,  ii.  332. 
England,  how  the  crown  became  heredita- 
ry, i.  156. 


fav'd)  for  ferving  his  country  longer 
than  the  time  limited,  i.  316. 
Ephori,  eftablifh'd  to  reftrain  the  power  of 
kings,  i.  155,  420.  ii.  238. 

When  they  were  created,  ii.  335* 
Equality f  in  all  by  nature,  i.  5,9,  17,  24, 
43,  44,  62,  105.  ii.  202,  343. 

Juft  among  equals,  i.  105. 

Civil  fociety  compos'd  of  equals,  i,  118. 

Leagues  don't  imply  abfolute  equality  be- 
tween parties,  i.  163. 

Where  'tis  hard  to  preferve  a  civil  equa- 
lity, i.  214. 

Popular,  to  what*tis  an  enemy,  i.  328. 

Of  right,  what  is  call'd  liberty,  i.  442. 

Kings  under  this  law  with  the  reft  of 
the  people,  ii.  27. 

Equals  can't  have   a  right    over  each 
other,  ii,  289,  345. 

No  nation  can  have  an  equal  within  it" 
felf,  ii.  345. 


The  ftate  of  it  fince  the  year  1660,  i.    Error,  all  fubjeft  to  it,  i.  215,  252,  311, 


232. 
How,  and  when  the  glory  of  our  arms 

was  turn'd  into  fhame,  i.  300. 
How  the  fuccefiion  of  her  kings  has  been, 

^-  339»  340-  iJ-  239- 
Her  wars  with  France  meerly  upon  con* 

tefts  for  the  crown,  i.  351. 
Her  miferics  by  our  civil  contefts,  i.  354, 

355- 
When  her  reputation  and  power  was  at 

a  great  height,  i.  402. 
Whether  our  kings  were  ever  proprietors 

of  all  the  lands,  ii.  41. 
The  naked  condition   of   our  anceftors 

upon  Cxfar's  invafion,  ii,  59. 
Has  no  diftatorian  power  over  her,  ii. 

63. 
Ever  a  free  nation,  and  chofe  her  own 

kings,  ii.  145,  262. 
I\,Iade  her  own  laws,  ii.  242,  244,  263. 
We  know  little  of  the  flrft  inhabitants, 

but  what  is  involv'd  in  fables  and  ob- 

fcurity,  ii.  2 TO. 
The  great  number   of   our  laws  make 

them  inconvenient,  ii.  222. 
Wherein  /he  ought  to  be  compar'd  v.'ith 

Rome,  ii.  231. 
Brave  in  William  I's   time,  \vh»n   /lie 

faw  her  laws  and  liberties  were  in  dan- 
ger, ii.  232. 
What  has  coft  her  much  blood,  and  has 


386. 

Difcover'd  by  the  difcourfe  of  a  wife  and 
good  man,  i.  358. 

By  it  popular  governments  may  fome- 
times  hurt  private  perfons,  i.  371. 

A  polite  people  may  relinquifh  thofe  of 
their  anceftors,  which  they  have  been 
guilty  of  in  the  times  of  their  igno- 
rance, ii.  222. 

Would  be  perpetual,  if  no  change  were 
admitted,  ii.  216. 

Where  they  are  in  government,  tho'  it 
may  be  eafy  for  a  while,  yet  it  can- 
not be  lafting,  ii.  378. 
Ejcheat  of  the  crown  for  want  of  an  heir, 

EJiates  of  the  realm,  divided  the  kingdom 
of  France,  i.  426.  ii.  160,  16  f, 
238,  277,  278,  279. 
Their  power  of  voting,  1.  434. 
Have  difpofed  of  crowns  as  they  pleafed, 
ii.  160,  l6x,  238,  277.  278,  279. 
Vid.   Parliaments,  ajfcmblia  gentral. 

Evil,  what  is  fo  of  itfelt,  by  continuance 
is  mjde  worfe,  and  on  the  firft  oppor- 
tunity isjuflly  robeaboli/h'd,  ii.  241. 

Eutrcpius,  when  a  fl.we  pick'd  pockets, 
^'c.  but  when  aminifter  he  fold  cities, 
&c.  i.  367. 

ExcommuviLatioK  denounced  on  the  viola- 
tors of  magna  charl.i,  ii,  139. 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE: 


F. 


Fj4hias  Maximus,  one  of  the  greateft 
and  beft  of  men  that  ever  Rome  pio- 
duc'^l^  i.  212. 
Fahiuiy    S^uintus,  in    danger    of    his  life 
for  fighting  without  order,    iho'   he 
gain'd  a  fignal  viftory,  ii.  294. 
PaSliors  about  regal  power  and  fuccefljon, 
.   how  to  be  prevented,  i.  341  • 
The   convulfions  they  make,    i.    347, 

352,  ii.  313. 
Of  the  Guelphsand  Ghibehns,  i.  375, 

376. 
Virtue  and  vice  were  made  the  badges  of 

them,  i.  3S8. 
Taitb^   implicit,   to  whom  it   belongs,  i. 

11,  12.  ii.  175. 
Families,  none  antienter   than  other,  and 

why,  i.  84,  85. 
What  requir'd  to  make  a  compleat  one, 
,   i.  120. 
When  our  ancefliors  fent  to  feek  a  king 

in  one  of   the  meaneft  of  them  in 

Wales,  i.  343. 
None  that  does  not  often   produce  weak, 

ignorant,  or  cruel  children,  ii.  104, 

105.  _ 

P'amom  men  for  wlfdom,  virtue  and  good 

government,  i.  261,  273,  301. 
tiave  eyes,  and  will  always  fee  the  way 

they  go,  ij.  175. 
Fathers,  the  power  of  fatherhood  belongs 

only  to  a  father,  i.  36,  38,  85,  93. 
Cruel  princes  no  fathers  of  their  country, 

i.  65.  ii.  52,  53,  132,  133. 
Their  charafter  indelible,    i.  84,    93, 

119. 
Adoption  of  them  abfurd,    i.  87,   89, 

90,  93,  94. 
Who  deferve  the  obedience  due  to  natu- 
ral parents,  i.  89. 
fey  ufurpation,  i.  98,  99,   136- 
The  fifth  Commandment  how  explain'di 

i.  ICO. 
Who  has  the  right  of  fathers,  i.  118, 

119. 
When  it  ceafes,  i.  119,   129. 
Embrace  all  their  children  alike,  i.  124, 

125. 

There  is  a  fort  of  tyrant  that  has  no  fa- 
ther, ii.  132,  133. 
Favourites,  net  always  the  beft  of  men, 
i.  89,  90.  _ 

Their  influence  over  princes,  i.  195,  196. 

Whom  the  monarch  commonly  makes 
fuch,  i.  363. 

How  their  exorbitant  defires  are  gratl- 
fy^d,  i.  446. 
Faujiina,  two  of  them,  who   by   their  af- 
ceftdency  tarniffi'd  the  glory  of  Anto- 


nmus  Pius  and  Marcus  Aurellus,  i,' 

362. 
Fear,  what  it  tranfports  a  wicked  man  to 

do,  i.  412. 
Renders  communities   gentle  and  cau* 

tious,  i.  414. 
Pu's  people  on  defperatc  courfes,  i.  437, 
What  is  the  meafure  of  it  to  that  ma- 

giftrate  who  is  the  minifter  of  God, 

ii.  86 
Fear,  when,  if  ever,  faid  to  enter  Csefai's 

heart,  ii.  242, 
Felicity,  man's,  where  plac'd,  i.  6, 
Fema^'e^,    vid.   ivsmtn 

Excluded  from  all  offices  in  the  commgn-* 

wealth,  ii.  152. 
Figurative  expreffions,  all  have  their  ftrength 

only  from  fimilitude,  ii.  328 
Filmer,h\i  right  of  all  kings,  i.  i,  170, 

172,   174. 
Takes  the  world  to  be  the  patrimony  of 

one  man,  i.  2,  3,  410. 
Ufes  not  one  argument  but  what  is  falie, 

nor  cites  one  author  but  whom  he  has 

perverted  or  abus'd,   i.  4.  ii.  125, 
And  his  partifans,  why  referv'd  to  this 

age,  i.  9.  ii.  234. 
His  bufinefs  is  to  overthrow  liberty  and 

truth,  i.  II.  ii.  387. 
His  bitter  malice  againft  England,  i.  jS» 
Makes  God  the  author  of  democracy. 

His  lord  paramount  over  children's  chil- 
dren to  all  generations,  j.  26,  27,  28. 

His  opinion,  to  whom  all  kings  are  re- 
puted next  heirs,  i.  51. 

Where  his  kingly  power  efcheats  on  in- 
dependent heads  of  families,  i.  70, 
84. 

His  adoption  of  fathers  of  provinces,  for 
what,  i.  90. 

His  notion,  That  we  muft  regard  the 
power,  not  the  means  by  which  it  is 
gain'd,  i.  92,  136.  ii.  19,   T91, 

His  diflinclion  between  eligere  and  In-- 
ftituere,  i.  148,   149. 

His  vile  abufing  of  the  reverend  Hooker, 
i.  149,   16?.. 

His  notion  of  begging  a  king,  i.  174, 

Abfolute  rnonarchy  to  be  thii  nurlery  of 
virtue,  i.  187. 

Attributing  order  and  ftabillty  to  it,  i. 
187,  248. 

Imputing  much  blood/hed  to  Rome's 
popular  government,  i.  214. 

His  backdoor,  fedidon  and  faftion,  1. 
_236,_  239. 

Hi?  opinion,  That  the  worft  men  iri 
Rome  thriv'd  beft,  ii.  247,  253. 

Th^t  the  nature  of  all  people  is  to  de- 
fire  liberty  without  reftraint,  i.  271. 


Dd  3 


Fi.me.-i 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Fiimsr,  his  cypher  of  the  form  of  rplx'd  go- 
vernments, i.  277. 

That  there  is  a  neceflity  upon  every 
people  to  chufe  the  worft  men,  for 
being  moft  hke  themfelves,  i.  301. 

His  defcription  of  the  tumults  of  Rame, 
i.  360. 

Affirms  that  more  men  are  flain  in  popu- 
lar than  abfolute  governments,  i.  3781 

The  extent  of  his  cruelties  of  a  tyrant, 

i.  379- 

His  attributing  ignorance  and  negligence 

to  popular  governments,  i.  3S9. 
His  notion.  That  the  virtues  and  wif- 

dom  of  a  prince  fupply  all  diftempers 

of  a  ftate,  i.  403 
That  there  is  no  fuch  tyranny  as  that  of 

a  multitude,  i.  408. 
That  kings  mufl:   be  abfolute,  i.  414, 

4^5- 
His  notion  of  a  king's  ceafing  to  be  £0, 

i.  415,  43°- 
His  whimfy  about  democracy,  i.  433. 
That  all  the  people's  liberties  flow  from 

the  gracious  conceflions  of  princes,  i. 

440.  ii.  40. 
That  there  is  no  coming  at  a  king,  if 

he  break  his  contraft  with  his  people, 

i.  449. 
That  a  father  of  a  family  governs  it  by 

no  other  law  than  his  own  will,  ii.  3. 
That  patient  obedience  is  due  both  to 

kings  and  tyrants,  ii,  4. 
That  there  were  kings,  before  any  laws 

were  made,  ii.  6. 
That    Abrahim,     Ifaac,    Jacob,    and 

Mofes  were  kings,  ii.  30, 
That  Samuel   by   telling  what  a  king 

would  do,  infiruded  the  people  what 

they  were  to  fuffer,  ii.    31,   35. 
That  inconveniences  and  mifchiefs   are 

feme  of  the  eflentials  of  kingly   go- 
vernment, ii.  38. 
That  all  laws  are  the  mandates  of  kings, 

ii,  40. 
His  ridiculous  faying,  Th©fe   that  will 

have  a  king,  ii,  4-. 
That  the  jews  did  not  ask  0  tyrant  of 

Samuel,  ii.  52. 
That  the  people's  cries  are  not  always  an 

argument  of  their  living  under  a  ty- 
rant, ii.  ;4. 
7'hir  our  Saviour  limits  and  diftinguiilies 

royal  power,  ii.  6t. 
That  the  tMbute  Cael'ar  impoi^'d  was  all 

their  coin,  ii.  64. 
Cirey.  Biafton,  as  a   p3tron  of  the  abfo- 
lute power  of  king?,  ii.  7^. 
That  St.   Paul's  higher  powers   meant 

only  a  monarch  tLit  carries  the  Iword, 

^f.  ii,  78. 


That  kings  are  not  bound  by  the  pofitive 
laws  of  any  nation,  Ii.  93,   124. 

That  the  original  of  laws  was  to  keep 
the  multitude  in  order,  il.  103. 

That  laws  were  invented  for  every  par- 
ticular fubjeft   to    find    his   prince's 


pleafu 


re,  11.  no. 


That  kings  are  above  the  laws,  ii.  114. 
Filmer,  his  opinion  when  princes  degene- 
rate into  tyrants,  ii.  119. 

That  tyrants  and  conquerors  are  kings 
and  fathers,  ii.  125. 

That  the  king  fwears  to  obferve  no  laws, 
but  fuch  as  in  his  judgment  are  up- 
right, &"€,  ii.  135. 

That  kings  are  not  oblig'd  by  volunta- 
ry oaths,  &c.   ii.  241. 

Hisprinciplesanimadvertedon,ii,i7i,T72i 

That  obedience  is  due  to  a  command, 
tho'  contrary  to  law,  ii.  176,   177. 

That  the  king's  prerogative  to  be  above 
the  hw,  is  only  for  the  good  of  them 
that  are  under  It,  ii.  182, 

His  equivocal  king,  ii.  188. 

His  opinion.  That  the  law  is  no  better 
than  a  tyrant,  ii.  197. 

That  a  perfe£t  kingdom  wherein  thd 
king  rules  by  his  own  will,  ii.  200, 

That  the  firft  power  was  the  kingiy  in 
this  nation,  ii.  207. 

That  all  judges  receive  their  authority 
from  the  king,  Ii,  2.2 1, 

That  the  power  of  kings  can't  be  re- 
ftrain'd  by  a£l  of  parliament,  ii.  235, 

That  the  king  is  the  author,  corredlor 
and  moderator  of  both  flatute  and 
common  law,  ii.  240. 

His  trivial  conceits  about  parliaments, 
the  time  v/hen  they  began,  (^c.  ii, 
240,  246,  247. 

His  notion  about  ufurpers  and  lawful 
kings,  ii.  271, 

That  the  liberties  claim'd  in  parliament, 
are  liberties  of  grace  from  the  king, 
and  not  of  nature  to  the  people,  iio 

That  the  people's  language  is  fubm'fllve 
to  the  king,  but  his  is  haughty  to 
them,  Ii.  293. 

That  kings  m^y  call  and  difTolve  par- 
liaments at  pleafure,   ii.  314. 

Admires  the  profound  wildom  of  all 
kings,  ii,  321. 

A  bitter  enemy  to  all  mankind,  ii.  364, 


3^  I- 


Hii  book  here  lately  reprinted,  as  an  in- 
troduifticn    to  a   popifh  fu:cefror,    ii. 

His  meaning  of  Le  roy  le  veut,  ii.  3S1, 

3S4.  3?v 
Fhttcicn,  what  the    vilefl    of   them  dare 

no:  deny,  i.  13. 

Flatterers  f 


I 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Flatterers,  what  call'd  by  Tacitus,  i.  427. 
The  Hebrew  kings  not  without  them, 

i.  329. 
Their    pernicious  advices    to    what  end 

given,  i.  336. 
Weak    princes   moft    fubjeft  to  them, 

i.  346,  362,  366,  396. 
Cleanthes's  faying  to  Ariftippus,  1.  364. 
By  what  handle  they  lead  their  princes. 

Have  made  their  valour  ridicu!ouSji.4oo. 

By  whom  thought  the  beft  friends,  and 
moft  worthy  of  great  tiufts,  ii,   175. 

The  author's  wifh,  that  princes  would 
abhor  thefe  wretches,  ii.  250. 

Almoft  ever  encompafs  crown'd  heads, 
ii.  360. 
Fleeti,  when  ours  were  very  famous,  i.  402. 
Florence,  the  feditions  there,  and  in  Tuf- 
cany,  i.  375. 

More  depopulated  now  than  any  part  of 
that  province,  tho'  formerly  in  a  few 
hours  it  could  bring  together  135000 
well-arm'd  men,  i,  376.  ii.  185. 
FoUy  i  mankind  does  not  univerfally  com- 
mit, and  perpetually  perfift  in  any,  i. 

72. 
Some  are  fools  at  40  years  of  age,  i.  405, 
Lord  chancellor  Egerton  faid  he  did  not 

fit  to  relieve  fools,  ii.  143, 
Force,  where  'tis  the  only  law  that  prevails, 

i.  190. 
What  the  Romans  gain'd  by  the  valour 

of  their  forces,  i.  222,  223. 
All  defence  terminates  therein,  i.  297, 

428. 
Thofe  that  ufe  it,    muft  perfeft  their 

work  or  periHi,  i.  311. 
Or  fraud,  in  oppofition  to  the  laws  of 

one's  country,    is  abfolutely    monar- 
chical, i.  359. 
When  the  Spartan  kings  were  overthrown 

by  it,  i.  420. 
Is  generally  mortal  to  thofe  that  provoke 

it,  i.  429. 
To  be  us'd,  when  there  is  no  help  in 

law,  i.  438.  ii.  105,  340, 
Can  never  create  a  right,  i.  444.  ii.  14, 

282. 
The  French  under  a  force  they  are  not 

able  to  refift,  ii.  40,  41. 
What  is  gain'd  by  it  may   be  recover'd 

the  fame  way,  li.  153,  282. 
When  all  difputes  about  right  naturally 

end  in  force,  ii.  308. 
Fcrfiiture  of  liberty,   how  can  it  be,    ii. 

289. 
Fortune,  of  all  things  the  moft  variable,  i. 

202. 
Kow  right  is  made  a  flave  to  i^,  i.  340, 

341. 


Fortune  oi  a  prince,  fupplys  all  natural  de- 
fers, i.  403. 
France,  the  falick  law  there,  1,  81,  158, 
ii.  150,   151. 
Her    antient  kings  right  how  confer'd 
on  them,  and  what  was  her  antient 
government,  i.   I55>  ii.  280, 
Her  revenge  on  England  for  all  the  over- 
throws fhe  receiv'd  from  our  anceftors, 
i.  232. 
Frequently  divided  into  feveral  patties,  i, 

242. 
Her  races  of  kings    four  times    wholly 
chang'd,   i.   243,    344,    346,    406, 

424- 
The  miferable  condition  ct  her  people, 

i.   278,    348,    349,   400,  401.   ii, 

306,  383. 
Her  greateft  advantages  have  been  by  the 

miftakcn  counfels  of  England,  i.  279, 

280. 
Her  bloody  contefts  and  fliugh'ers  for  the 

crnwn,  i.  344,  347,  349,   351,  352. 
Had  ten  bafe  and  flothful  kings,  call'd 

Les  roys  faineans,  i.  346,  406. 
The  regal  power  limited,  i.  351,  425. 
Had  four  kings  depos'd  within  150  years, 

i.  350. 
Civil  wars  frequent  there,    tho'  not  fo 

cruel  as  formerly,  i.  351. 
Compar'd  with  Venice,  i,  396, 
Her  iblditrs  running  from  their  colours, 

i.  400. 
Her  general  aflemblies  continu'd  the  ex- 

ercife   of  fhe   fovereign   power,    long 

after  Lewis  XFs  death,  i.  423,  424. 
Had   never  any  kings  but  ot    her  uao 

chufing,  i.  423. 
Henry  V.  of  England  moft  terrible  to 

her,  i.  424. 
Their  laws  made  by  themfelves,  and  not 

impos'd  on  them,  i.  424. 
The  people  have  underfluod  their  rights, 

i.  426. 
The  reafon  of  the  people's  miferics,  ii. 

40,  41,  49,   51. 
The  right  to  the  crown  is  in  a  great  mea- 

fure  from  the   law  of   that  country, 

Inftances  hereof,  ii.  160,   161. 
She  does  not  allow  her  kings  the  right 

of  makine:  a  will,  ii.   161. 
By  whom  the  power   of  conferring  the 

fovereignty  was  exeicis'd,  ii.  278. 
By  the   people's  increafing  the  power  of 

their  mafter,  they  add  weight  to  their 

own  chains,  ii.  306. 
Her  king  can't  be  call'd  the  head  of  his 

people,  ana  why,  ii.  333. 
Lc  roy  le  veu  ,  &   tel  eli   notre   plaifir, 

are  French   rants  ;  but  no  edi£l  there 

has  the  power  of  a  Lw,  till  it  be  re- 

giflcr'd  in  pirliament,  ii.  383. 

D  d   3  F.:::-:., 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


^rat}ce-\hs  conqueftof  her  only  to  be  effe£t- 
ed  by  the  bravery  of  a  free  and  well 
fati&fy'd  people,  ii.  389. 
Tra^'^h  ^oon  incorporated  themfelves  witti 

the  Gaul?,  i.  290. 
Fraud,  accounted  a  crime  fo  deteftable,  as 
not  to  be  imputed  to  any  but  flaves, 
ii.  232. 
All  wicked  defigns  have  been   thereby 

csrry'd  on,  ii.  ^25, 
Who  delight   in  it,    and  will  have  no 
other  minifters  but  fuch  as  will  be  the 
inftruments  of  it,  ii.  3S8. 
Tre?y  what  nstions  fo  efteem'd,  i.l8.ii.l84. 
Vid.  popular  ge'verninenti. 
JVIen.  how   to  know  ourfelves  fuch,  i. 


Cermanyj  the  power  of  this  emperor,!.  421, 

From  thence  our  original  and  govern- 
ment is  drawn,  ii.  86. 

When  {he  had  no  king,  ii.  100. 

The  emperors  thereof  reftrained  by  laws, 
ii.  105. 

The  Weftern  empire,  how  it  came  hi- 
ther, ii.  154. 

Tacitus's  account  of  the  people's  valour, 
ii._243. 

^Jot  imaginable,  that  thefe  people,  jea» 
lous  of  liberty,  {hould  conquer  this 
country  to  enflave  themfelves,  ii.  247. 

No  monarchy  more  limited,  ii.  294. 
Gieoniits  by   deceit  got  Joihua  to  make  a 


league  with  them,  ii.  143. 

l8,   132,    133,   181.  ii     14S,   184.  Cladiafors  were  (\ii\esy  i.  215,  226. 

J^ecple,  fcarce  ever  conquered  by  an  ab-  Their  fury  extingui/h'd  with  their  blood, 

folute  monarch,  i.  186,    199.  i.  226. 

Philip  of  Mdcedoncunfefs'd  his  people  to  Cod,  with  an  equal  hand,  gave  to  all  the 

be  free  men,  i.  199.  benefit  of  liberty,  i.  22. 

The  Britons  were  fc,  becaufe  governed  What  fort  of  kings  he  approves  in  fcrip- 


by  their  own  laws,  ii.  241,  242. 

Men,  or  noblemen,  exempt  from  bur- 
dens, and  referv'd,  like  arms,  for  the 
ufes  of  war,  ii.  257. 

Free  cities,  what  and  who  made  them, 
ii.  7%Q. 
T>-ugulity,  the  virtues  that  are  upheld  by  it, 
ii.  48,  /  ' 

Fruit',  of  our  corrupt  nature,  i.  169. 

Own  Ubour,  i.  174 

Kecover'd  liberty,  i.  236. 

Victory,  how  gain'd  and  lofl,  i.  300. 

Always    of   the  fame  nature    with  the 
feeds  from  whence  they  come,  i.  395, 


G. 


GEnealogies,  the  Hebrews  exa£l  In  ob- 
ferving  them,  '•  4'j(  448. 
Of   princes  nicely   to  be  fearch'd   into, 
would  be  dangerous  to  fome  crowns, 

J-  73»  75»  78.  >'•   282. 
Of  mankind  very  confufed,  i.  72,  448. 

ii.  152. 
Of  being  the  eldeft  fon  of  the  eldeft  line 
of  Noah,  i.  443. 
Cencva  and  Rome,  wherein  they  only  can 

concur,  i.  7. 
Censa,  how  ic  is  governed,  i    234,  292. 

By  whom  that  city  was  in!ecl:<^d,   i.  292. 
Gentlemen,  at  this  day  comprehends  .ill  that 
are  raib'd  above  the  common  people, 
11,254. 
Gamanicus  his  mcdefly  in  refufing  the  em- 
pire, was  the  occafion  of  h;s  death, 
i.  343.  ii.  144- 
Ce-many,  h(  w  govein'd,  i.  234.  ii.  243. 
iKua]  to  the  Gauls  in  fortune,  fo  long  as 

Rome  was  free,   i.  304,    305. 
Thcpcwcr  cf  the  German  kings,  i  421. 


ture,  1.  26. 
Can  (ivt  by  few  as  well  as  by  many,  i, 

23. 

Always  conftant  to  himfelf,  i.  48.  il. 

^eyer  prcfcrib'd  any  rule  about  dividing 

tlie  world,  i.  75. 
The  fountain  of  juftic?,  mercy  and  truth, 

i.  97,  no. 
By  a  univerfil  law  gave  no  rule  for  the 

making  of  kings,  i.  148. 
Is  our  lord  by  right  of  creation,  i.  i^r. 
How  he  endow' d  the  rulers  of  his  people, 

i.  187. 
His  fecret  counfels  impenetrable,  i.  203. 
>yhat  the  ufual  courfe  of  his  providence, 

I.  229. 
Helps  thofe  who  juflly  defend  themfelves, 

i.  298.  ^  * 

His  general  ordinance,  i.  313. 
Gave  laws  to  the  Jews  only,  i.  338. 
V  hen  he  refus'd  to  bear  the  cries  of  his 

people,  ii.  16,  28,  36. 
His  anointed  and  accurfed,  il.  21. 
A  law  in  Rome,  that  no  God  (hould  be 
'  worfhip'd  without  the  confent  of  the 

fenaCe,  ii.  92. 
Ccci'f  every  one  feeks  their  own,  accord- 
ing to  the  various    motions  of   their 

mind,  i.  64,  134,  409. 
The  publick,  the  end  of  all  government, 

i.  160,  ii.  5,  58,  117,   T18. 
Is  moie  obferv'd  in  mixt  than  abfolute 

ones,   i.  389. 
Of  mankind  depends  on  religion  and  vir- 
tue, i.  383. 
C-ill'd  evil,  and  evil  good,  ii.  Si. 
A<?iion'^  always  carry  a  reward  with  them^ 

il.  J72. 

Csod 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Cood  and  evil,  but  three  ways  of  diftin- 

guiiliing  betweeh  them,  i.  47. 
Cood  men,  who  deferve  to  be  call'd  fo,  i. 
«. 
How  they  obey  their  princes,  i.  363. 

fCnow  the  weight  of  fovereign  power, 

and  doubt  their  own  ftrengtb,  ii.  337* 

Go^neft  is  always  acconnpany'd  with  wif- 

dom,  ii.  119. 
Cojpely  the  light  of  the  fpiritual  man,  i. 

382. 
Cotbi,  their  polity,  \.  234-  "•  190. 

For  above  300  years  never  contrafted 
marriages,  nor  mix'd  with  the  Spa- 
niards, i.  290. 

Seiz'd  Rome,  whilft  Honorius  was  look- 
ing after  his  hens,  i.  305. 

Subdu'd  by  the  Saracens  in  one  day,  i. 
400. 

Grew  famous  by  the  overthrow  of  the 
Roman  tyranny,  ii.  68. 

Concerning  fuccelTion  to  the  crown  du- 
ring their  reign,  ii.  149. 

Not  above  four  in  300  years  time  were 
the  immediate  fucceffors  of  their  fa- 
thers, ii,  156. 

In  Spain  overthrown  bj  the  Moors,  ii. 
157,  348. 

Their  kings  in  Spain  never  ventured  to 
difpute  with  the  nobility,  ii.  339. 

Their  kingdom  never  reftor'd,  ii.  348. 
Ccrutrnment,  the  original  principles  of  Jt  to 
be   examin'd,   and    our  own  in  par- 
ticular, i.  12,   184. 

An  ordinance  of  God,  i.  22,  25. 

The  feveral  forms  thereof  left  to  man*s 
choice,  i.  22,  25,  39,  63,  64,  74, 
75,  83,  116,  124,  130,  131,  134, 
168,  209,  233,  268,  272,  432. 

Of  the  lawfulnefs  of  ciianging  it,  con- 
fider'd,  i.  23,   209,  236.  ii.  59. 

Defpotical  differs  from  the  regal,  i.  28, 
29,   103. 

The  ground  of  all  juft  governments,  i. 
38,  258,  277.  ii.  225. 

No  man  has  it  either  for  or  from  him- 
felf,  i.  48,  164,  315,  416.  li.  127. 

None  ever  began  with  the  paternal 
power,  i.  53. 

To  whom  the  conftitution  of  every  go- 
veinment  is  refer'd,  i.  63. 

AH  for  the  good  of  the  people  and  their 
po{^erity,  i.  97,  106,  122,  134, 
164,  172,  184,  220,  268,  297, 
298,  302.  ii.   131,  213,  308. 

Is  a  collation  of  every  man's  private  right 
into  a  publick  flock,  i.  103,104,130, 

Where  juft,  it  has  ever  been  the  nurfe 
of  virtue,  i.   104,  114. 

Popular  for  whom  befl,  i.  107. 

For  whom  inllituted,  i.  122,  125,  259. 

V/ha:  fort  was  crdain'd  by  God,  i,  174. 


Coverntticntf  the  effe£ls  of  one  well  order'd, 

i.  203. 
What  only  deferves  praife,  i.  222,  225, 
How  the  beft  has  been  compos'd,  i.  233, 

290. 
Regal  had  a  mixture  of  ariftocratlcal  and 

democratical  in  them,  i.  238. 
Whence  the  denomination  of  all  is  ta- 
ken, i.  238,  250,  432. 
The  foundation  remaining  good,  the  fu- 

perftru£lures  may  be  alter'd,  i.  239, 

246,  247,  308.  ii.  53,  59. 
When  it  cannot  fubfift,  i.  252. 
The  effeds  of  a  diforder'd  one,  i.  255. 
Allfubjedl  to  corruption  and  decay,i.267. 
None  impos'd  on  men  by  God  or  nature, 

i.  271,  277. 
Mixt  compar'd  with  abfolute,  i.  274, 

ii.  365. 
What  the  only  juft  one,  by  confent  of 

nations,  i.  277. 
What  may  be  imputed  to  it,  i.  284. 
None  ever  freer  from  popular  feditions 

than  Switzerland,  i.  294. 
That  the    bed  which  beft  provides  for 

war,  i.  296,  299,  302. 
None  without  civil   wars,   tumults  and 

feditions,  i.  309,  372,  374. 
The  end  for  which  it  is  conftituted,  i, 

324,  326,  414.  ii.  290. 
The  Roman,  how  introduc'd,  i.  331, 
Expos'd  to  the  moft  infamous  traffick,  i, 

367. 
Or  what  parts  it  may  confift,  i.  432, 
Is  a  great  burden  to  the  wife  and  good,  i, 

436,  437.  ii.   106,   131,   186. 
To  reform  it,  is  to  bring  it  to  its  firfl: 

principles,  i.  438.  ii.  348. 
Queftions    arifmg   concerning  our    own, 

muft  be  decided  by  our  laws,  and  not 

by  the  writings  of  the  fathers,  ii.  65, 
St.  Paul's  obedience  to  higher  powers, 

muft  be  underftood  to  all  forts  of  go- 
vernment, ii.  78. 
What  would  make  all  in  the  world  mag- 
na latrocinia,  ii,  94. 
When  the  ends  of  it  are  accompli/h'd, 

•ii.  189. 
Moft  of  them  have  been  mixt,  at  leaft 

good  ones,  ii.  790-    364. 
What  only  is  reckon'd  good,  ii,  203. 
Our  own  the  fame  with  the  Roman  in 

principle,  tho' not  in  form,  11,231. 
From  whence  the  great  variety  of  them 

proceeds,  ii.  508. 
The  Englifh,  not  ill  conftituted,  11,309. 
By  what  means  the  foundations  may  be 

remov'd,  and  the  fuperrtrufture  over- 
thrown, ii.  312. 
In  a  well  conftituted  one  the  remedies 

againft  ill  magiftrates  are  fafe  and  eafy, 

ii,  335. 

D  d  4  Government  i 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


fflot'trftment ,  wiftom  and  valour  reqnir''d  for 

the  inftitutjon  of  a  good  one,  ii.  349. 
"Where  it  is  either  intirely  to  be  changed, 

or  reform'd  according   to  its  firft  in- 

ftitution,  ii.  3S9. 
The  bleffings  of  an  abfolute  one,  ii.  365, 

366. 
Its    eftablifhment   is    an    arbitrary    a£l, 

wholly    depending    upon    the  will  of 

man,  ii.  377. 
Governors  .ippointed  to  execute  the  laws  for 

the  good  of  the  people,  i,  J 04,   109, 


J26,  317. 


n. 


547. 


The  law  appoints  helps  for  their  infir- 
mities, and  reftrains  their  vices,  i. 
436. 

The  people's  creature,  ii.  30,  46,  2S9, 

34-4- 
"Where  they  are  removable,  if  they  will 

not  be  reclaim'd,   ii.  348. 
The  good  and  bad  make  the  people  hap- 
py and  milerable  in  their  turns,    ii, 

363- 
Gratiti  of  K.  John  to  the  pope,  declar'd  by 

parliament  to  be  unjuil,  illegal,  ^c, 

ii.  140. 
What  implies  an   annihilation  of  fome 

grants,  ii.  204. 
Where  they  ought  well  to  be    prov'd, 

that  the  nature  and  intention  of  them 

rri5y  appear,  ii.  265. 
Of  v.hat  nature  thofe  of  our  kings  are, 

ii.  266,  267. 


Grotius,  his  making  St.  Pefer  and  St.  Paul 
perfedly  agree,  about  their  different 
phrafes  of  ordinances  of  God,  and  or- 
dinance of  man,  ii.  82. 
His  faying,  Qui  dat  finem,  dat  media  ad 

finem  neceflaria,  ii.  317. 
About  king's  fiipulations,  and  right  of 
fending  ambaffadors,  ii.   353. 
G'udphi   and   Ghibelins,    their  fa£lions  in 
Tufcany,  i.  227,  375,   376.^ 
Genoa  infefted  with  their  faftions,    i. 
292. 
Gufiwous  (Charles)  his  confefling  to  an  am- 
bafTador  how  he  ought  to  reign  over 
the  people  that  had  chofe  him,   ii. 
277,  272. 
lie  and  his  uncle  Adolphus  were  con- 
tent with  the  power  that  the  laws  of 
their  country  gave  them,  ii.  323. 


H. 


HAnnibal,  kill'ft  more  great  Roman 
captains  than  any  kingdom  ever  had, 
i.  284. 
The  Samnites  embafTy  to  him,  i.  285. 
How  he  loft  the  fruit  of  all  his  vidories, 

i.  304. 
When    he  invaded    Italy,    no    country 
feem'd  to  have  been  of  greater  Arength, 

'•  374- 
What  to  be  done,  if  he  be  at  the  gates, 

ii.  315. 


Of  lands,  where  they  have  been  refum'd,    Hanjeatick  towns,  i.  294. 


ii.  268. 

Grecians,  knew  no  other  original  title  to 

government,  tban   that  wildom,  &c, 

which   was  beneficial  to  the  people, 

i.  61. 

Wherein  they  excel'd  ether  nations,  ii. 

Overthrew  the  vaft  armies  of  the  Perfi- 

ans,  1.  197,   198. 
"Were  reduc''d  to  yield  to  a  virtue  greater 

than  their  own,  i.  230. 
No  abfolute  monarch  among  them  efta- 

bliili'd  by  law,   i.  248. 
Have  bee.T  bv   diforder  in   government, 

exp''~5'd  as  a  prey  to  the  firft  invader, 

i.  305. 
"When  tficy  were  happy  and  glorious,  i, 

373-. 
Their  virtue  expir'd  with  their  liberty, 

'•  394- 
The   word    tyrant  came   from   Greece, 

and  what  it  fignify'd,  it.  53. 
riouti/li'd  in  liberty  in  the  time  of  Saul, 

ii.  58. 
Crot-u-^,  his  explanation  of  fovereign   and 

limited  power,  i.  317,  428.   it.  280. 
Wherein  he  juHifies  fubjcfts  in  taKing 

up  arm?,  i.  382, 


Hatred  univerfal  incur'd  by  princes,  who 
always  fear  thofe  that  hate  them,  i. 
380,  387.  ii.  u. 
To  all  that  is  good,  i.  384. 
Jiea^,  why  kings  are  call'd  by  this  name, 
and  the  import  cf  the  word  both  iri 
fcriptureand  profane  authors,  ii.  325, 
326,   327. 
The  differences  between  the  natural  and 

political,  ii.  327. 
W'hat  the  office  of  a  head  is  in  a  natural 
bony,  ii.  329,  330,   331,   333. 
J/f^.'fCt;  judge  different  from  a  king,  i.  172. 
Kings  not  inftituted   by  God,  but  given 

33  a  punifhment,  i.    17T,    172. 
How  their  go veinment  confifted,  i.  234, 

291. 
Kings  their  power  exceeded  the  rules  fet 

by  God,  i,  329,  429. 
What  their  difcipline,  i.  420. 
In  their  creation  of  judges,  kings,  &c, 

had  no  regard  to  paternity,  i.  442. 
Like    to  their    neighbours  in  folly  and 
vice,  and   would   be  like  them  too  in 
govetpraent,  ii.  16. 
Their  power  greater  than  what  the  law 

allows  to  cur  kings,  ii.  69. 
Whether  the  law  given  them  by  Ggd  be 

fo 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

{o  perfei'T:  as  to  be  obligatory  to  all    Ihbhs,  fcurriloufly  derides  Plato,  Ariftotlc 


u. 


ai8. 


nations, 
fletr  reputed,  the  abfurdity  of  the  notion, 

i.  5^,  55.  56,  5^>  62,  71,  85. 
Next  in  blood,  i.  79,  80,  l?o,   I2i, 

158,   i59>  1S9.  ii.  2S0. 
Annex'd  to  one  fingle  perfon,  i.  T?5« 
All  the  children  of  Noah  were  his  heirs, 

i.  125. 
Next  to  the  crown  fet  afide,    i.   159, 

161,  162.  ii.  158,  159»  ^^i- 
Bellaie's  extravagant  doftrine  of  an  heir 

apparent,  ii.  166. 
Enjoys  the  fame  rights  as  the  parent,  and 

devolves  the  fame  to  bis  poflerity,  ii. 

288. 
f]£nglji  and    Horfa,    on   what  terms   the 

county  of  Kent  was  given  them,  ii, 

264. 
flenry  IV,  of  France,  how  he  defir'd  to 

recommend  himfeif  to  his  people,  ii. 

166. 
I,  of  England,  whether  he  was  an  ufar- 

per  01  not,  11.  271 


and  Cicero,  i.  64. 

His   Bellum  omnium  contra  omnes,  i* 
74,  83.  ii.  171. 

Hjs  Hoftis  Sc  latro,  i.  315. 

The  firft  that  contriv'd  a  compendious 
way  of  juftifying  kings  in  the  moft 
abominable  perjuries,  ii.  137. 
Holland f  of  great  ftrength  fince  the  re- 
covery of  their  liberty  from  the  Spa- 
nifh  yoke,  i.  200. 

The  war  with  them  in  1665,  i.  402;» 

403* 
How  they  have  defended  themfelves  from 

the  greateft  monarchies,  ii.  79. 
The  flates  are  call'd  High  and  Mighty 

Lords  J    and    the  word  Heer,   which 

fignifies  Lord,  is  as  common  as  Mon- 

fieur  in  France,  &c,  ii.  260,  294. 
The  condition  of  the    17  provinces  of 

the  Netherlands,  when  they  fell  to  the 

houfe  of  Auftria,  ii.  305. 
The  power  of  the  States- General  how 

limited,  ii.  352. 


men,  J. 


90. 


V.  his  care  was  to  pleafe  his  people,  and    Honours^  the  higheft  falfly  attributed  to  ill 
to  rzife  their  fpirits,  ii.  386. 

Was  terrible  to  France,  i.  424. 
His  character,  ii.  385,  3S6,  389. 

VI,  became  a  prey  to  a  furious  French 


woman,  11. 


386. 


yil.  had  neither  crofs  nor  pile  for  his 

title,  Ii.  273. 
Vill.  acknowledged  the  power  of  the 
parliament,  in  making,  changing  and 
repealing  laws,  ii.  121,  233. 
Jleptarcby,  when  this  was  divided  Into  7 
kingdoms,    each  kept    ftill  the  fame 
ufage  within  itfelf,  ii.  244,  246. 
Could  as  eafily  unite  the  7  councils  as 
the  7  kingdoms  into  one,  il.  246. 
JRercukiy  an  account  of  him,  i.  230. 
Hereditary  right  can't  naturally  be  in  any, 
i.  76,    121. 
Prerogative  of  Dominion,   how  under- 

ftcod,  i.  105. 
Right,  as  a  reward  of  virtue,  i.  137. 
How  a  kingdom  comes  to  he  fo,  i.  154, 

155- 
Crowns  (0  as  to  their  ordinary  courfe, 

but  the  power  reftrain'd,  i.  235. 
Monaichies,  in  them  no  care  is  taken  of 

him  that  is  to  command,  i.  303. 
According    to   proximity  of   blood,  not 

prefciib'd  by  any  laws  of  God,  i.  337. 
Children  feldom  prove  like  their  parents, 

i-  370- 
Crowns,  five  different  ways  of  difpoGng 

them,  ii.  149. 

Heroum  regno,  i.  61,   1 16.   ii.  6. 

The  government  of  whom,  i.  443. 
J.':/Iory  Reman,   Tacitus  (ays  it  wanted  men 
to  write  thciis,  i.  391, 
4 


Given  to  ill-gotten  wealth,  i,  112,  204, 
232,  366,  368. 

To  fuffering  virtue  fometimes,  i    252» 

Where  they  have  been  the  rewards  of 
vice,  i.  261. 

To  thofe  who    diflervM  the    common- 
wealth, i.  770,  276. 

Juftly  beftow'd  on  thofe  that  rightly  per- 
form their  duty,  i.  319. 

From  whom  purchas'd,  i.  367. 

Given  for  fervices  done  to  the  publrck,  i* 
446. 

Princes  could  not  without  breach  of  trufl: 
confer  them  upon  tbofe  that  did  not 
deferve  them,  ii.  249, 
Hooker,  his  miftake  in  ti  e  fundamentals  of 
natural  liberty,  i.  19. 

His  admirable  faying  about  lawful  powers, 
i.  150. 

Slighted  by  Filmer,  i.  19,  162. 
Hottoman,  his  chara£ter  and  account  of  the 

French  kings,  i.  423. 
Human  nature,  the  miierable  ftate  of  it,  if 
not  improv'd  by  art  and  difcipline,  ii, 

59- 
Frailty,  allowances  muft  be  made  for  it, 

196. 

Hurt,  they  do  none  who  do  nothing,  where 

thib  rule  is  falfe,  i.  346. 


I. 


"^  Ames  I.  (king)  his  f^^^irg  about  hi?  mak- 
%    iijg  of  judges  and  bi/hops,  i.  382. 
*'  Acknovvledges  himfilf  the  fervdnt  of  the 
common- wealth,  i.  428. 

Jama  I, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


'Jamet  I.  faid  he  was  fworn  to  maintain  the 
laws,  and  fliould  be  perjur'd  if  he 
broke  them,  it.  xi8,  119,  3S2. 

"Jdmei  II.  what  we  might  expe«ll  from  him, 

ii.  365- 
'Japhety  this  part  of  the  world  feems  by  the 

fcrlptures  to  be  given  to  his  fons,  ii, 

Jealoufyoi  ftate,  1.  342,  357. 
jKe/a//J  joinM  to  Geneva,  i.  7. 

To  be  behev'd  with  caution,  i.  iig. 
The  prefent  emperor  of  Germany  too 

much  govern'd  by  them,  ii.  324. 
The  foul  that  gives  life  to  the  whole  body 

of  the  PopiHi  fadlion,  it.  365. 
The  order  banifh'd  out  of  the  kingdom 
by  an  arret  of  the  parliament  of  Paris, 
but  refus'd  by  thofe  of  Tholoufe  and 
Bourdeaux,  ii.  383. 
yeivi  had  a  great  veneration  for  the  houfe 
of  David,  and  why,  i.  164. 
Grown  weary  of  God's  government,  i. 

182.  ii.  52. 
Had  leave  to  deftroy  their  enemies,  i.  192. 
Idolaters  among  them  in  David  and  He- 

zekiah's  days,  i.  261. 
Idolatry  the  produftion  of  the  govern- 
ment they  had  fet  up,  i.  330,  331, 
418. 
Submit  to  the  Roman  power,  ii.  62. 
Thought  Chrift's  firft  work  would  be  to 

throw  off  the  Rom  m  yoke,  ii.  64. 
Being  converted,  thought  themfelves  freed 
from  the  obligatierj  of  human  laws, 
ii.  90. 
Some  pretend  to  know  their  original,  ii, 

152. 
A  proclamation  to  extirpate  them,  ii.362. 
ImperatoKy  a  name  given  by  the  Roman  ar- 
mies to  pretors  and  confuls,  ii.  285. 
Imperium  fummum  fummo  modo,  i 

modo  non  fummo,  > 

Liberrimum,  i.  157,  317.  ii.  280.  j 
Ab  eo  ^  quo  fpiritus,  ii.  288. 
Impojing  on  people's  confciences,  i.  293. 

On  fome  princes  how  eafy  it  is,  J.  367. 
Jttcda,  who  they  are  at  Venice,  i.  234. 
Diftinftion  between  them  here  and  Gives, 
ii.  318,  319. 
JndetiiKityy  the  aflurance  of  it  would   turn 
men's  other  vices  into  madnefs,i.  450. 
Indujiryy  what  is  a  fpur  to  it,  i.  390. 
Infancy y  vid.  child. 

Inkeritanccy  the  common  divifion  of  it  among 
brotners,  i.  126. 
Where  it  gave  no  right  to  crowns,  i.  1 56, 

i6r,  162. 
To  .-ne  family,  1.  158,   i6z,   18S. 
Of  the  fword  left  to  families,  i.  193. 
What  the  apoftles  left  to  their  fuccelTors 
in  relation  to  the  fupreme  power  on 
earth,  i.  316. 


Inheritance,  private,many  controvcrfies  arl^ 

upon  them,  i.  338. 
What  right   is  equally  inherited  by   all 

children  on  the  death  of  their  parents, 

i.  441. 
William  I.  did  not  leave  the  kingdom  as 

fuch  at  his  death,  ii.  89. 
What  belongs  to  females,  ii,  152. 
Little  regard  to  it  in  the  Auflriaa  houfe 

according  to  blood,  ii.  164. 
In  fome  places  the  law  gives  private  in» 

heritance  to  the  next  heir,  in  others 

makes  proportions  and  allotments,  ii, 

166. 
Injuries,    the  ways    to   prevent   or  punifH 

them,  either  judicial  or  extrajudicial, 

i-  3i3>  3^4- 
Great  ones  will  one  time  or  other  fall 

on  thofe  that  do  them,  ii.  430, 
The  Italians  fay,  he  that  does  an  injury 

never  pardons,  ii.  11. 
Thofe  that  are  extreme,  when  fo  to  be 

underftood,  ii.  121. 
Injujiice,  what  is  fo  in  the  beginning,  can 

never  be  the  effeft  of  juftice,  ii.  203, 
Inquijition  of  Spain  and  other  places,  ii, 

92,  366.  ^ 
InJitnB,  what,  i,  177. 
Injittution,  he  that  inftitutes  may  alfo  ab- 
rogate, i.  23,  95.  ii.  121. 
Is  an  ele£tion,  i.  148. 
Of  a  kingdom  is  the  aft  of  a  free  na- 
tion, i.  426.  ii.  48. 
No  prince  had  a  more  folemn  one  than 

Saul,  ii.  18. 
Some  kings  have  by  it  but  little  power, 

ii.  70. 
The  magiftrates  prerogatives  depend  upon 

it- 97-  , 
Of  power  is  coercive,  it.  loi. 
When  princes  defieft  from  the  end  of 

theirs,  ii.115. 
Wherein  the  end  of  it  chiefly  confifts,  ii. 

189. 
Often  the  corruption  of  the  ftate  is  taken 

for  it,  ii.  213. 
They  who  inftitute  a  magiftracy,  beft 

know  whether  the  end  of  the  iaftitu~ 

tion  be  rightly  purfu'd  or  not,  ii.  277. 
Integrity  of  manners  makes  laws  as  it  were 

ufelefs,  i.  259. 
Never  lubfervient  to  the  luft   of  princes, 

i.  262. 
Makes  men  contented  with  a  due  liberty, 

i.  274. 
Preferves  popular  equality,  i,  328. 
Can't  be  found  in  abfolute  governments, 

i.  370.  ^  ;- 

Preferves  the  people's  fafety,  ii.  48.     • 
Intercft,  what  advantages  are  reap'd   from 

uniting  the  nations  to  that  of  the  go- 
vernment, i.  393. 

IntereJ^j 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

Jttterejiy  pcrfonal,  prefet'd  to  the  publick    Judges,  whether  there  be  any  concerning 


good,  ii.  48 < 
Jnterregnuitiy    that  there  can  be  none,   a 
fundamental  maxim  of  great  monar- 
chies, i.  337. 
Jobn^s  (king)  grants  to  the  pope  declar'cl 
by  the  parliament  unjuft,  iUegaJ,  i. 
140. 
Jofepbus  of  the  Jewiih  government,  i.  171, 
■    On  what  account  he  calls  it  a  theocracy 
and  an  ariftocracy,  i- I77j  43^. 
Says,  their  princes  were  to  do  nothing 
without  the  advice  of  the  Sanhedrin, 
or  to  be  oppos'd  if  they  did,  i,  418. 
y^puay  had  neither  the  name  nor  power  of 

a  king,  i.  172.  ii.  8. 
JJaac,  hischarafter,  i.  29. 
JJraelitei,  had  no  kings  in  the  firft  inllltu- 
tion  of  their  government,  i.  60, 
Nor  till  400  years  after,  ii.  209. 
Strangers  only  excluded  from  being  kiqgs, 

i.  149. 
Their  government  ariflocratlcal,  i.  170, 
"What  the  eftecl  of  their  having  kings, 

i.  121,  429. 
After  Solomon,  perpetually  vex'd  with 
civil  feditions  and  confpirjcies,  &c.  i. 
330. 
Ask'd  for  a  tyrant  (tho'  not  by  that 
name)  when  they  ask'd  for  a  king  af- 
ter the  manner  of  other  nations,  ii, 

Not  known  certainly  by  what  law  they 

were  goi^ern'd,  ii.  209. 
Liv'd  under  the  power  of  tyrants  whofe 
pr^lamaiions  were  laws,  ii.  367. 
Italy,  when  fee  lay  defolate,  i.  202,  204, 

333- 
How  her  commonwealths  have  flouriih'd 

and  decay'd,  i.  226,  227,  303,  305, 

306,   333,  374,  376. 
Charles  VIII.  of  Fr?nce  conquer'd  the 

beft  part  of   it  without    breaking    a 

lance,  i.  7.%\,  306,  ii.  19, 
"Judge,  where  every  man  is  to  be  his  own, 

i.  132.  ii.   118,  322,   343. 
"Who  fliall  be  between  prince  and  people, 

i.    321,    323.    ii.    115,    116,    168, 

214. 
No  prince  fit  to  be  judge  of  his  own  fafls, 

ii.  115,  11^,   184,  34.2,  346,  347. 
The  power  of  judging  wbep   'tis  fit  to 

call  the  fenace  or  people  together,  to 

whom  and  by  whom  refer'd,  ii   276, 

!rhe  parlidment  the  ht!\  judge  In  dubious 

cafes,  ii.  -p.^,   324,  347. 
Where  'tis  not  fit  to  be  a  judge  in  his 
ow.T  cafe,  ii,  ^45, 
Judges  (fuch  as  Jolhua,  Gideon,  &c.)  whe- 
.   »        ther  their  jj.wer  was  regal  aad  juft  or 
not,  I.  46,  47,  453. 


kings  titles,  I.  338,    339. 
The  power  of  making  them,  i.  382. 
Sometimes  the  courts  are  fiird  with  ill 

ones,  i.  387,  388.  ii.  224. 
Appointed  to  decide  the  contefts  arifing 

from  the  breach  of  contrails,  i.  451, 
Their  opinion  concerning  fhip>  money, 

ii.  46,  355. 
The  religion  of  their  oath,  ii.  iiz,  122, 

194,   223,   225,   22l5. 

Parliament  own'd  by  kings  to  be  judges 

of  their  flipulations,  ii.  141. 
What  they  ought  to  be,  and  in  what 

fenfe  chofen  by  the  king,  ji.  194. 
Who  were  executed  as  traitors  for  fub- 

verting  the  laws  of  the  land,  ij.  194, 

225,  355. 
What  aft  Edw.    3.   promoted  for  his 

judges  todo  juflice,  ii.  196. 
The  general  rule  they  are  fworn  to  ob- 

ferve,  ii.  197,  223,  355. 
The  power  by  which  they  adl  Is  from  the 

law,  ii.  2??,  223,  224. 
When  they  become  the  miniflers  of  the 

devil,  ii.  230. 
The  fad  confequence  of  having  all  kings 

conftiti^ted  judges  over  the  body  of  the 

people,  ii.  321,  322,  324,  343, 
To  determine  controverfies  m  a  matter  of 

right,  ii.  345. 
Whofe  commands  they  are  bound  to  obey, 

,  "•  355- 
Judgment  perverted,  the  ill  efFefls  of  it,  i, 
J4. 

Future,  not  fufficient  to  reftrain  men 
from  being  vitious,  ii.  75. 

Here  they  are  pafs'd  by  equals,  ii.  224, 

Thofe  the  kings  of  Judah  gave,  were  in 
and  with  the  Sanhedrin,  ii,  224. 

None  that  is  right  can  be  given  of  hu- 
man things,  without  a  particular  re-^ 
gard  to  the  time  wherein  they  pafs'd, 
ii.  310. 

Kings  can  give  none  upon  any  of  their 
fubjedls,    and    why,    ii.  350,    353, 

354* 

Human  is  fubjeft  to  error,  ii.  384. 

y*""'^**  grand   and  petit,   their  power,  ii< 

194,  224. 
How  the  judges  are  afiiftants  to  them,  ii. 

225. 
In  whofe  light  they  give  their  verdidl,  ii. 

355- 
Jujike,  has  always  truth  for  its  rule,  i.  57, 

120. 

What  the  proper  aft  of  it,  i,  109. 

Of  every  government  depends  on  an  ori- 
ginal grant,  i.  156. 

Has  fometimes  been  perverted  by  the  de- 
ceit of  ill  men,  i,  252.  ii.  196. 

J4hc, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Jujiice,  the  fword  of  it  for  what  ufe  and 

i.  313. 
Where  it  will  be  expos'd  to  Tale,  i.  368. 
The    rule  of   civil  and  moral  adions, 

i.  382. 
How  well  admjnifter'd  in  republicks,  ii. 

79'.  .     .. 

What  is  meant  by  it,  11.  92,  95, 

The  diftribution  of  it  juftly,  is  a  work 
above  the  ftrength  of  one  man,  ii.  no. 

When  the  courfe  of  it  is  certainly  inter- 
rupted, ii.  173, 

Deviations  from  it,  ii.  196. 

Where  it  is  beft  adminifter'd,  ii.  ai^. 

Overthrown  by  the  number  of  laws,  ii, 
221,  222. 

In  receiving  it  the  king  is  equal  to  ano- 
ther man,  ii.  224. 

Magiftrates  made  to  fee  it  well  executed, 

ii.  347' 

K. 

KAthtrine  de  Meiicbj   faid   never  to 
have  done  any  good  but  by  miftakc;, 
i.  255. 
Kingcraft^  what,  1.  407,  417,  418. 
Was  wholly  exerted  in  the  fubverfion  of 
the  laws  of  France,  and  the  nobility 
that  fuppotted  them,  ii.  386. 
Kingdom,  the  patriarchs  had  a  fpiritual  one, 
i.  28,  29. 
No  paternal  one  among  the  Hebrews,  i. 

45- 
Thought  never  to  be  bought  at  too  dear 

a  rate,  i.  59. 

How  the  firft  kingdoms  were  fet  up,  1.71. 

What  are  lawful  ones,  i.  104. 

What  it  imports,  i.  154. 

One  pofTefs'd  by  nine  feveral  families 
within  200  years,  i.  192. 

All  have  their  various  fludtuations,  thro* 
ill  difeipline  or  conduft,  i.  191;,  299. 

The  greateft  have  been  dcftroy'd  by  com- 
monwealths, i.  303. 

Dil'putes  about  them  moft  difficult  and 
dangerous,  and  very  bloody  in  feveral 
inftances,  i.  338,   344,  346. 

Of  France  divided  by  the  cAates  of  the 
realm,  i.  427. 

Not  eftablifh'd  but  for  the  good  of  the 
people,  i.  436. 

Of  Granada,  their  ufage  of  their  prin- 
ces, i.  437. 

All  ereded  at  firft  by  the  confent  of  na- 
tions, i.  444. 

Frequently  reduced   to  their  firft  prin- 
ciples, i.  444. 
.Some  eleftive,  ibme  hereditary,  and  how 
directed,  ii,   279,   280. 

Conftituted  by  conquering  armies,  and 
thofe  ed-aWifh'd  in  the  moft  oideriy 
manner,  ii.  223* 


Kingi 


be 


and  ftates,    how  they  came  to 

erected,  ii.  291. 
The  prerogative  or  royal  charter  granted 

to  them,  i.  3,  114. 
The  end  of  their  inftitution,  i.   8,  9, 

23,   64,   67,    96,    97,  109,    no, 

134,  136,  157,  386.  li.  228,  346, 

347. 
Whether  they  may  be  reftrain'd  or  cen- 
ftir'd,  i.  9,  24,  70,  loi,  235,  316, 

32J>  323>  417*  43i»  436.^11.  25, 
lor,  102,  280,  287,  317,  340, 
341. 

In  what  fenfe  they  are  like  other  men, 
i.  13,  85,   181. 

Evil  ones  will  have  evil  minifters,  i.  14, 
265. 

The  relation  between  them  and  the  peo- 
ple, i.  20. 

The  only  fort  mentioned  in  fcripture  with 
approbation,  i.  26,  172.  ii.  47,  189. 

The  firft  a  cruel  tyrant,  j.  31. 

Who  taken  from  out  of  the  leaft  family 
of  the  youngeft  tribe,  i.  46. 

AH  not  the  natural  fathers  of  their  peo- 
ple, i.  51. 

Whom  the  antients  chofe  for  theirs,  i, 
60,  61,  I20,  173. 

Not  all  of  them  wife,  i.  85,  405.  ii, 
321. 

A  king  by  nature,  who,  i.  108,  114, 
117,  183,  192.  ii.   83,  202,  203. 

No  defign  to  fpea.k  irreverently  of  them^ 
i.  144,  266. 

Set  up  by  the  nobles,  antients  and  people, 
i.  146,  149,  153,  156,  i6i,  220, 
425,  431.  ii.  127,  157,  158. 

All  not  alike  in  power,  nor  fpirit  and 
principle,  i.  155.  ii.  119. 

Some  good  and  lome  bad,  ii.  323,  324, 


whether  any  are  immediately  fo  on  the 
death  of  the  predeceflbr,  and  before 
they  are  prodaim'd,   i.    163,    164, 

337- 
Given  in  wrath,  i,  171,   174. 

426700  kings,  i.  178. 

Many  great  ones  overthrown  by  fmall  re- 

publicks,  i.  186. 
Few  poffefs  the  qualities  requifite,  i.  190, 

370,  416,  434. 
The  name  thereof  aboli/h'd,  i.  235.  ii, 

97,  98. 
Regis  ad  exemplum,  not  always  (o  in  all, 

i.  261. 
A  virtuous  one,  but  a  momentary  help 

fometimes,  when  his  virtueb  die  with 

him,  i.  280,  34S,  370. 
Whether  thofe  may  be  thrown  down  that 

fet  up  themfelves,  i,  323. 
The    fljihful  and    neg'igent   accounted 

great 


't^ 


Ah  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


great  evils,  i.  346,  347,  350,  357, 

^       387.  3S8,  39i>  39^.  ,     ^^, 

iCing:,  the  bcft  liable  to  be  corrupted,  and     Ki 
fubje£t  to  mif^akes  and  paflions,  i.  362. 
ii.  1S3,   343. 

Who  faid  to  be  like  a  pha?nix,  i.  370. 

None  fo  vicious  but  will  fometimes  fa- 
vour juftice,  i.  379. 

Apt  to  live  under  the  power  of  their  lufts, 
i.  383. 

"Wherein  juft  ones  will  find  their  honour 
and  fecurity,  i.  3S8. 

Where  lawful  ones  have  prov'd  equal  to 
the  word  ufurpers,  i.  381. 

Whofe  condition  moft  miferable,  and 
why,  i.  406. 

Seme  have  experience  as  men,  but  net 
otherwife,  i.  407. 

The  name  can't  make  a  king,  unlefs  he 
be  one,  i.  407.  ii.  297. 

Have  a  power  of  granting  honours,  im- 
munities, f  ^.  out  of  the  publick 
ftock,  i.  415,  440.  ii,  249,   318. 

Ncne  to  have  more  power  or  abilities  to 
perform  his  office  than  Mofes,  i.  417. 

Advanc'd  by  abjuring  their  religion,  i. 

Under  the  happy  inability  to  do  any  thing 
againft  the  laws  of  their  country,  i. 
426,  428,  453.  ii.  107,  165,  193, 

338- 

Where  they  have  their  (hare  (and    the 

fenate  theirs)  of  the  fupreme  authori- 
ty, the  government  is  beft  fupported, 
i.  428. 

Have  found  out  now  cafier  ways  of"  do- 
ing what  they  pleafe,  i.  438. 

How  there  would  be  as  many  kings  in 
the  world  as  men,  i.  442, 

If  they  have  no  title,  they  muft  be 
made  fo  either  by  force  or  confent,  i. 
444.  ii.  13. 

The  confequence  cf  being  unaccountable, 
i.  450. 

Have  no  other  juft  power  than  what  the 
laws  give,  ii.  1,48. 

The  fafety  of  their  kingdoms,  th?ir 
chiefeft  law,  ii.  3. 

The  firft  were  of  the  accurfed  race, 
while  the  holy  feed  h3d  none,  ii,  8. 

iBy  what  wicked  means  many  of  them 
have  come  in,  ii.  ic. 

Of  Ifrael  and  Judah  under  a  law  not  fafe- 
ly  to  be  tranfgrefb'd,  ii.  23. 

■Why  thofe  of  Ifrael  commited  many  ex- 
tiavjgancies,  ii.  24. 

Tadg'd  by  the  great  Sanhedrin,  ii.  25. 

This  fort  of  government  the  people's  crea- 
ture,   ii,    30,  46,    289,   346,   368, 

NoL  to  claim  the  liberty  of  doing  in- 


juftice,  in  virtue  of  their  prerogative^ 

ii.  32,  34. 
ngs  bound  up  to  the  laws  as  to  matters 

of  property,  ii.  41. 
Not  to  be  too  powerfal,  nor  too  rich,  ii, 

48. 
Of  Ifrael,  tho'thcy  led  vaft  armies  into 

the  field,  feem  to  have  poflefj'd  but 

little,  ii.  49. 
What  their  govetnment  ought  to  be,  ii^ 

54- 
Of  England  reign  by  law,  and  are  under 

it,  and  why,    ii.   63,    69,  74,  75, 

356. 
What  will  indear  them  to  their  people, 

ii.  71, 
The  foverelgn  power  often  meant  by  this 

name,  ii.  73. 
What  meant  by   lawful    ones,    ii.  77, 

112,  113,   127. 

Why  thofe  of  Judah  conld  make  noIawSj 

ii.  84. 
May  be  fear'd  by  thofe  that  do  ill,  ii.  86. 
How  made  in  the  Saxon  times,  ii.  87. 
What  thofe  of  the  greateft  nations  have 

fuffer'd,  ii.  96. 
What  is  that  king  which  never  dies,  ii. 

113.  354. 

Cannot  mitigate  or  interpret  laws,  Ii. 
121. 

When  faid  to  become  perjur'd,  ii.  119. 

Not  mafters  but  fervants  of  the  common- 
wealth, i.  428.  ii.  127. 

Can't  be  interpreters  of  their  own  oaths, 
ii,  134, 

Compel'd  to  perform  the  conditions  of 
Magna  charta,  ii.  140,   141. 

May  refign,  if  they  will  not  obferve  their 
oaths,  ii.  146,   147. 

Next  in  blood,  generally  cannot  be  faid 
to  be  kings  till  they  are  crown'd,  ii. 
J49,   153. 

Hew  he  is  not  to  be  heard,  if.  196. 

The  regal  power,  not  tlie  firft  in  this  na' 
tion,  ii.  2.07. 

Where  the  fame  power  that  hsd  creat- 
ed this  government,  abolifli'd  it,  ii, 
210,  211. 

What  our  anceftors  did  with  relation  to 
them,  ii.  210, 

Judges  rightly  qualified  are  to  inftruin: 
them  in  matters  of  Ijw,  ii.  223. 

Wherein  they  are  equal  to  other  men,  i:'. 


224. 
None  as  fuch  have  the  power  of  judging 

any,  ii,  224.   227,  228,  230,   3,2. 
Where  they  ceafe  to  be  fo,  and  beccm*? 

tyrants,  Ii.  229. 
Their  power  not  reRrain'd,  but  created 

by  Magna  charta  and  other  \xwit  ;'• 

2:4, 

King-, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE, 


KfrtgSf   what  is  natural  for  the  worft  of 

them  to  do,  ii.  236. 
The  Norman,  had  no  rftore  power  than 

the  Saxon,  and  why,  ii.  247. 
Tacitus  fays,  they  were  taken  out  of  the 

nobility,  ii.  249, 
Said  to  be  chofen,  or  made,  and  fome- 

times  depos'd  by  their  great  councils, 

ii.  a6i,  317. 
Never  matters  of  the  foi!  of  England,  ii. 

262,  290,  291. 
"Why  they  fpeak  always  in  the  plural 

number,  ii.  267. 
The  titles  of  ours  examined  into,  ii.  272, 

273. 
Whom  the  parliament  have  made  are 

lawful,  or  we  have  had  none  for  thefe 

700  years,  ii.  273. 
Their  power  of  calling  parliaments  was 

given  to  them,  ii.  276,  315. 
Naturally  delight   in    power,    and   hate 

what  crofles  their  wills,  ii.  281,  375. 
The  moft  abfolute  princes   in  the  world 

never  had  this  name,  il.  284. 
Some  fubje£l  to  a  f'reign  power,  feme 

tributary,  and  the  Remans  bad  many 

depending  upon  them,  ii.  a86,  287. 
The  adls  of  one  de  fa£lo,  confider'd,  ii. 

297,  299. 
Wherein  the  efTence  of  a  king  confifts, 

ii.  297. 
Deter'd  from  endeavouring  to  feduce  any 

of  their  great  men  from  their  duty, 

ii.  311. 
Who  are  a  great  calamity  to  a  nation, 

il.  315,  388. 
Who  only  are  the  heads  of  the  people, 

ii.  324,  329,  330,  331,  333. 
If  their  adtions  are  to  be  examin'd,  and 

their  perfons  punifh'd,  ii.   340,  341. 
None  lefs  capable  oftentimes  of  forming 

a  right  judgment  than  they,  and  why, 

"•  343- 
Nor  can  be  prefent  in  all  their  courts,  ii. 

35^-. 

Don't  ftipulate  for  themfelves,  but  their 
people,  ii.  352. 

In  what  cafes  they  are  pepetually  mi- 
nors, ii.   354. 

Their  power  not  univerfal,  for  many 
things  they  cannot  do,  Ii.   355,  356. 

May  in  fome  degree  mitigate  the  vm- 
diclive  power  of  the  law,  ii.  358. 

The  advantage  of  their  being  reftrain'd, 
ii.  362. 

Not  created  to  make  laws,  but  to  go- 
vern by  them  ;  and  what  is  fignify'd 
by  ie  roy  le  veut,  ii.  382,  383,  3S4. 

Are  fworn  to  pafs  fuch  laws  as  the  people 
chufe,  ii.  384,  387. 
Kingi-bentbf  Ux  what  ^ni  eftablifh'd,  iJ, 
228. 


Kings-bench,  the  king  that  renders  juftice  is 
always  there,  &c.  ii.  354. 

Knight\  fervice,  what,  ii.  253. 

Knighthood,  the  dignity  of  it,  and  wha\ 
was  accounted  a  degrading,  ii.  253, 
.  254- 

KrJghti  of  /hires  in  the  Saxon  times,  ii. 


JI56. 


L. 


LAWS,  the  prevalency  of  them  over 
fovereign  commands,  i.  2. 
Who  beft  obeys  them,  i.  18. 
The  end  of  them  is  to  enjoy  our  liberties, 

i.  18,   19.  ii.  72,  209. 
Invert  magiftrates  with   power  for  the 

publick  good,  i.  67,  12^. 
Of  England  acknowledge  one  only  heir,' 

i.  ;?6,  125. 
Said  to  be  written  reafon,  ii.  123, 
Have  in  'em  a  conftraining  force,  i.  i^i. 
To  whom  the  power  of  making  them  be- 
longs, i.  151,  153.  ii.  109. 
Are  the  meafure  of  power,  i.  154,  i^8> 

161,  416,  439.  ii.  355,  356. 
Of  each  country  create  a    right  to  the 

perfon  that  governs  it,  i.    157,  158. 
Prefctibe  rules  how  power  fhould  be  tranf- 

mitted,  i.  158. 
Where  good  ones  do  no  good,  i.  187, 

ii.  II. 
To  be  fuited  to  prefent  exigences,  i    i69> 

244. 
Make  no  diftinflion  of  pe.''-p  •,.•53. 

Lex  perduellionis,  i.  257. 
Made  in  a  fort  ufelefs  by  integrity  of 

manners,  i.  262. 
Abhorrers  of  the  dominion  of  it,  i,  <?7o. 
Inftituted  for  the  preventing  of  evii,  i. 

312,  323,  427.  ii.  148. 
Thofe  that  go  beyond  them  a£l  therein 

as  private  perfons,  i.  317. 
Who  moft  reftrain'd  by  them,  i.  320. 
Subfift  by  executing  juftice,  i.  324.  ii. 

7- 
Concprning  the   fucceflion,    i,    337.  ii. 

108. 
Tricks  at  law  to  put  men  to  death,  i. 

H^».  3?S- 

When  in  force,  men  of  wifdom  and  va- 
lour are  never  wanting,  i.  357. 

When  they  were  overthrown,  i.  378. 

The  defpifers  deftroy'd  without  law,  2, 
420,  429. 

Don't  always  go   by  plurality  of  voices, 

J.  434- 
Of  every  place,  /how  the  power  of  each 

magiftrate,  i.  451. 
Were  before  kings,  ii.  6. 
Proofs  hereof,  ii.  7,  102, 

Laivsf 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


taws,    of  Go  J,    not  to  be  abrogated  by 

man,  11.  26. 
Our  kings  can  make  none  of  themfelves, 

ii.  68,   izi,  281. 
We  know  none  but  thofe  of  God  and  our 

felves,  ii.  71. 
Are  not  made  in  vain,  ii.  75, 
Some  neither  joft  nor  commendable  ;  in- 

ftances  thereof,  ii.  92,  93,  220. 
The  ditedive  power,  which   is  certain, 

has   a   power   over    the    confcience, 

ii.  93. 
The  fandlion  that  defer\'es  the  name  of 

a  law,  ii.  94,  95,   109,   188,  215, 

220. 

To  what  end  made  as  to  magiftrates,  ii. 

102,   103. 
Princes  and  nations  both  gainers  by  the 

due  obfervance  of  them,  ii.  107,  112, 

146,  147.  338.  339- 
That  is  not  a  ftate  or  government  which 

has  them  not,  ii.  108. 
Athenians  not  without  them  when  they 

had  kings,  ii.   109. 
How  faid  to  be  above  the  king,  ii.  ijz. 

Can  only  be  alter'd  in  parliament,  ii, 

121,  122,  220,  238. 
For  what  reafon  eftabhfh'd  :  an  encomi- 
um, ii.  123. 
Who  violate  thofe  of  nature  In  the  high«fl 

degree,  ii.  131. 
Of  ones  country  to  be  fubmltted  to,  ii, 

150. 
Of  nature,  eternal,  ii.  150,  160. 
By  whom  the  rigour  of  it  is  to  be  temper'd, 

ii.   195,   196. 
None  made  by  man  can  be  perfeft,  ii, 

200,  220,  222,  223,  235. 
By  them  kings  became  firft  what  they 

were,  ii.  210,  234.. 
Thofe  good  for  one  people,  that  are  not 

fo  for  all,  ii.  116,  217. 
The  ftatute  of  Henry  VII.  concerning  a 

king  de  fa£to,  for  what  end  made,  ii. 

297,  299. 
Plain  ones  have  been  induftrioufly  ren- 

der'd  perplex'd,   ii.  313. 
Good  ones  prefcribe  fafe  remedies  againft 

the  mifchiefs  of   ill   magiltrates,    ii. 

335.  337. 
Where  they  are  merciful  both  to  ill  and 

good  men,  ii.  3 38. 

Should  aim  at  perpetuity,  ii.  361. 

The  mifchiefs  etTefted  by  a  pei  Ion's  word 
having  the  force  of  a  law,  ii    363. 

When  they  may  be  eafily  overthrown,  it 
will  be  attempted,  ii.   378. 

What  gives  the  power  of  law  to  the 
fanftions  under  which  we  live,  ii.  381. 
Leagues^  don't  imply  abfolute  equality  be- 
tween parties,  i.  163. 


Leagues  with  conquer'd  nations,  i.  21 5. 

League- faftions  and  wars  of  the  Hugo- 
nots,  i.  242,  243. 

How  faithfully  they  have  been  obferv'd, 
i.  295. 

Men  cannot  too  much  rely  upon  them, 
i.  295,  296,  298. 

Thofe  that  make  fuch  as  are  detrimental 
to  the  publick  are  punifhable,  i,  319. 

Made   againft  the   Hollanders,  ii.    79. 

Of  Jofhua  with  the  Glbeonites  gain'd  by 
deceit,  ii.  143. 

Made  on  a   national,  not  perfonal  ac- 
count, ii.  352,  353-      .       . 
Learning  makes  men  excel  in  virtue,  i. 

,197- 
Said  to  make  men  feditious,    but  dif- 

prov'd,  i.  184,   249. 
Lcgijlati've  power  of  Rcme  and  Sparta  con- 
tinu'd  in  the  people,  i.  210,  220.  ii* 

When  it  came  to  be  fcom'd,  i.  214. 

The  magiftratical  power  receives  its  be- 
ing and  meafure  from  hence,  ii.  ioi» 

Can't  be  confer'd  by  the  writ  of  fum- 
mons,  but  muft  be  effentially  and  ra- 
dically in  the  people,  ii.  368. 

Is  always  arbitrary,  ii.  376. 

Only  trufted  in  the  hands  of  thofe  who 
are  bound  to  obey  the  laws  that  are 
made,  ii.  380. 

The  king  can't  have  it  in  himfelf,  not 
any  other  part  of  it  than  what  is  for- 
mal, ii.  385,  389. 
Legijhtors  fhould  always  be  of  the  wifeft 
men,  i.  153. 

Wherein  their  wifdom  confifts,  1.  245. 

Wherein  they  /hew  themfelves  wife  and 
good,  ii.  377. 
Legitimacy  contra£ted,  i.  160,   16 1. 
vid.  Bafiardy, 

Some  children,   tho'  born  in  wedlock, 
utterly  rejected  as  being  begotten  in 
adultery,  ii.  167. 
Lezvis  XI.  his  fubverting  the  laws  of  his 
country,  i.  422. 

XIV.  accounted  his  not  being  able  to  aft 
contrary  to  law,  a  happy  impotence, 
ii.   165. 
Liberty,    the  notions   thereof,    and    from 
whence,  i.  6,  9,  22. 

Natural,  the  confeqaence  if  remov'd,  i. 

Wherein  it  folely  confirts,  i.  17.  ii.  126. 
Filmer's  notion  of  the  grcatcft  liberty  ia 

the  world,  i.  17. 
Oppugners  of  publick  liberty,  i.  19. 
Univerfal  afTerted,  and  what  that  is,  i. 

29,  42,  76,    131. 
The  aflertors  thereof  have  God  for  theic 

patron,  i.  104,  268. 

Libirt 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


t'iherty  produces  virtue,  order,  ftabllity,  i, 

i86,  250. 
The  lofs  of  it  in  the  Roman  empire,  i. 

193,    194,    199,    200,  2i3,    226, 

S56,  ii.  206. 
The  mother  and  nurfe  of  virtues,  i.  193^ 

199,  226,  286,  365,  378,  394. 
Made  the  moft  virtuous  people  in  the 

world,  I.  228. 
When  fubverted,  the  worft  men  thrive 

beft,  i.  253,  254,  256. 
How  our  natural  love  to  it  is  temper'd, 

i.  263,  270. 
None  fought  it  but  with  fome  reflraint, 

i.  274. 
V/hat  the  love  of   it  infpires,  i.   249, 

285. 
At  home,  and  war  abroad,  i.  287. 
When   this  is  lofl,  kingdoms  and  ftates 

come  to  nothing,  i.  199,  226,  227, 

303- 
Patricians  the  beft  defenders  of   it,  i. 

310. 

The  way  to  recover  it,  i.  326. 

Can't  be   preferv'd,  it  the  manners  cf 

the  people  be  corrupted,  5.  363. 
None  remain'd  in  Rome,  when  Sylla  re- 

fign'd  his  power;   3.  378. 
When  loft,  excellent   fpirits  fail'd,    i, 

39^>  392>,394-       .  .     . 

A  people  can  defue  nothing  befides  it,  1. 

413- 

Can't  fubfift,  if  vice  and  corruption  pre- 
vail, i.  438. 

Is  a  right  common  to  all,  i.  440,  442. 

God  gave  the  Ifraelites  this  law,  i!.  28. 

Who  have  no  true  fenfe  of  it,  ii,  37. 

Our  anceftors  left  us  the  beft  laws  ihey 
could  devife  to  [deft nd  it,  ii.  71. 

All  by  the  law  of  nr^ture  have  a  right  to 
their  liberties,  lands,  goods,  &"<:.  ii. 

I3i>  365- 
What  principles  make  men  lovers  of  it, 

ii.  170, 
None  can  fubfift  vi'here  there  1?  an  abfo- 

lute  power  above  the  bw,  i.  123,184. 
Where  'tis  deftroy'd  by  the  prerogative, 

ii.  x86. 
Of  a  people,  naturally  inherent  In  them- 

felves,  ii.  209,  265,  289. 
The  value  our  anceftors  fet  upon  theirs, 

ii.  221,  292,  374. 
None  has  better  defended  them  than  this 

nation,  ii.  232,  374. 
To  it   Tacitus  attributes    the    German 

bravery,  ii.  243. 
What  is  the  utmoft  aft  of  it,  ii.  247. 
The  exercife   of   the  natural  liberty  of 

nations,  in   the  feveral  limitations  of 

the  fovereign  power,  ii.  280. 
Of  a  people,  the  gift  of  Gcd  an',  na- 
ture, ii,  2S8. 


Liberty,  forfeited  or  refign'd,  ii.  289. 
No  veneration   paid   to   magiftrates  can 

lefTen  the  liberty  of  a  nation,  ii.  293. 
Nothing  valuable  to  it  in  the  opinion  of 

the  Romans,  ii.  302. 
Eafy  to  get  partisans   to  make  good  by 

force  the  greateft  violations  of  it,  ii, 

310. 
How  to  ufe  one's  own  with  relation  to  the 

publick,  ii.  343,  344. 

Liberty  with  a  milchief,  ii.  367,  369',' 

370- 
Of  thofe  who  aft  in  their  own  perfons^ 

and  of  thofe  who  fend  delegates,  is 
perfeftly  the  fame,  ii.  371, 
That  for  which  v.*e  contend  as  the  gift  of 
God  and  nature,    remains  equally  in 
all,  ii.  372. 

Lin:al  fubjeftion  never  learned  from  Mofes, 
i.  116, 
Succeflion,  where  not  follow'd,  i.  159, 
160. 

London f    the  privilege  of   the  Common- 
Hall,  ii.  318, 

Lord  Paramount,  over  whom,  I.  26,  27, 

29»  31- 
From  whence  he  muft  come,  i.  41,  42. 
None  by  nature  over  his  brethren,  i.  126. 
The  mifchiefs  they  both  do  and  fufFer  are 

very  great,  i.  437, 
Lords,  how  they  have  loft  the  authority 

which  they  had  formerly,    ii.   312, 

313. 
Lcrd's'dayf  not  to  be  fpent  in  fports  and 

revellings,  ii.  178. 
Love    to    one's  country,    <ommonwealths 

have  it  moft,  i.  2S0,  286,  287. 
The  happy  effefts  of  it,  i.  284. 
A  refolution  to  die  for,  or  live  with  it, 

i.  2S4,  296,  297. 
The  way  to  make  people  in  love  with  it, 

'•  297>  35I'  395- 
This  now  turn'd  into  a  care  of  private 

intereft,  i.  308. 
The  behaviour  of  thofe  that  are  lovers, 

&c.  i.  351,   392,   393. 
Occafions  fometimes  wars  and  tumults, 

'•  374- 
Loyally,  thofe  th^t  boaft  loudeft  of  it,  moft: 

apply  it  the  wrong  v.'ay,  i.  439. 
Liiciilliis,  his  little  army  put  Tigranes  with 

20GOCO  men  to  flight,  i.  200 
Luxury  of  the  Romans,    the  occ.ifion   of 

their  ruin,  i.  232. 
Brought   into  Rome  by  C.  Manlius,  i. 

260. 
Expofes  the  Virtuous  to  fcorn,  i-  iCit^. 
When   in  fafliion,    the  defire   of  riches 

muft  increafe,  i.  367. 
The  braveft  nations  moft  enllav'd  by  it, 

ii.  51. 

Lycurgtn, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


'X.ycurguif    his  laws  receiv'd  their  autho- 
rity  from   the   general   affembly,  ii. 
85,   109. 
Abfuid  to  think  of  reftoring  his  laws, 

it.  216. 
To  what  the  long  continuance  of  them  is 
attributed,  i.  361, 

M. 

MAceionian  kings,    their  power  was 
but  fmali,  i.    199. 
Their  army  overthrown  by  Paulus  Emi- 

lius,   i.  299. 

Vid.  Monarchy. 
Macbiavel,  his  admirable  faying,  i,  187, 

409,  410. 
Magi,  who  ufurp'd  the  Dominion  of  Per- 

fia  after  the  death  of  Cambyfes,  i.  315. 
Magifiracy,  can   have  no  intereft  diftindl 

from  the  publick,  i.  96,  97,  262. 
Its  office  is  to  execute  the  law,  i.  96, 

313.  ii.  189. 
If  the  people  be  bafe,  &c,  it  can't  be 

fupported,  be  the  ruler  never  fo  per- 

fea,  i.  269,   334. 
Whether  it  be  that  power  which  above 

all  reftrains  liberty,  i.  271. 
Strangers  admitted  into  that  of  Rome, 

i.  288. 
The  eft'e£l  of  regal  power  committed  to 

an  annual  or  othervvife   chofen  ma- 

giftracy,  i.  300,  390. 
None  can  have  the  right  of  it  that  is  not 

a  magtftrate,  i.  314,  315. 
Where  it  had  nothing  to  do  in  fplritual 

things,  ii.  66,  67. 
The  ordinance  both  of  God  and  man, 

ii.  82,  83,  97,  99,  102. 
Circumfcrib'd  by  fuch  rules  as  can't  be 

fafely  tranfgrtft,  ii.  86,  336,  337. 
Where  obedience  is  due,  ii.  93,  94,  95, 

96. 
On  what  the  right  and  power  of  it  de- 
pends, ii.  97. 
The  nature  of  it,  ii.  293,  294, 
None  now  in  being,  which  owes  not  its 

original  to    fome   judgment  of   the 

people,  ii.  350. 
Magtjiratei,  by   whom  conftituted,  i,  10, 

log,  124,  450.  ii.  183. 
-    To  what  end  fet  up,  i.  64,  65,  95. 
Minlfters  of  God,  i.  95.  ii.  62. 
How  they  are  helpful  to  nations,  i.  11 1, 

173*  "•  315.  319- 
Under  feveral  names  and  limitations,  i. 

357,  451-  . 
Jewifii,    wherein  like  the  diflators  of 

Rome,  i.  175. 
Puniftiable  with  death  by  the  Roman 

law,  i.  258,  317,  319. 
Annual  eleftion  of  them,  i,  284. 


Magljlrates,  have  enjoy 'd  large  powers,  that 

never  bad  the  name  of  kings,  i.  320, 
How  to  be  reftrain'd,  i.  313.  ji.  102, 

106,   338. 
A  particular  charafter  of  good  and  evil 

ones,  ii.  172,   173. 
Whenthey  were  temporary  andoccalional, 

ii,  210. 
Walk  in  obfcure  and  flippery  places,  ii, 

338. 
What  to  be  done  to  thofe  who  defpife  the 

law,  ii.  338. 
Wherein  their  ftrength  is,  ii.  345. 
The  firft  may   be  virtuous,    but    tlieir 

fucceflbrs  may  foon  be  corrupted,  ii, 

377.  37S. 
Magna   Charta  grounded  on  K.  Alfred's 

laws,  i.  18. 
The  Jews  had  none  fuch,  ii.  62. 
What  it  obliges  the  king  to  fwear  to,  It, 

113- 
Puts  every  thing  on  the  laws  of  the  land, 

and  cuftoms  of  England,  ii.   122. 
Is  only  an  abridgment  of  them,  ii.  139, 

262. 
Not  the  original,  but   a  declaration  of 

the  Englifli  liberties,  ii.  234,   377. 
The  rights  the  nation  have  refolv'd  to 
maintain,  ii.  234. 
Male-Line  examin'd,  i.  80,  339.  ii.  8x. 
Malice^  is  blind,  i.  259* 

Seditions,    &c,    arife  from  thence,   u 
309,  3IT.) 
Mamalukeiy  their  great  defeat  near  Tripoli 
by  Selim,  i.  279. 
Accounted  themfelves  all  noble,    tho* 
born  flaves,  ii.  261. 
Man  naturally  free,  i.  5,  38.  ii.  28S. 
Every  one  chief  in  his  own  family,  i« 


•5» 


3b. 


Can't  overthrow  what  God  and  nature 

have  infticuted,  i.  34.  ii.   72,  73. 
Creates  governments  and  magiftrates,  i, 

39- 

None  knows  originally  from  whom  he  is 

deriv'd,  i.  45,  50,  72.  ii.  152. 
Whence  his  mifery  proceeds,  i.  no. 
Wants  help  in  all   things,   i,    no.  if, 

361. 
What  rrakes  a  natural  difference  among 

men,  i.  115. 
All  fubjedl  to  error,  i.  215,  335.  ii, 

107. 
Enters  into  fome  kind  of  government  by 

reafon,  i.  271. 
Follow  what  feems  advantageous  to  them- 
felves, i.  395. 
What  every  one  ought  to  be,  ii.  10. 
None  can  ferve  two  contrary  intereits,  ii, 

58. 
Are  all  by  nature  equal,  ii.  201. 
Where  every  one  is  a  magifttate,  ii.  315, 


Ee 


Manr.OTi. 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


jH^ifion,  tiC.  cnjoy'dby  tenure  from  king-', 

ii.  a66. 
H'farriageSy  often  dedar'd  null,  i.  160. 
Of  Plebeians  with  Patricians,    i.  209, 

240,  245. 
Where  prov'd  of  no  force  to  legitimate 

children,  ii.    168. 
A  power  muft  be  lodg'd  fomewhere  to 
decide  them,  ii.  i68. 
Mafiers,  how  far  their  commands  are  bind- 
ing, li.  176,   177. 
Only  to  -decide  contefls  between  them 
and  their  fervants,  ii.  345. 
Jlljximsy  nothing  to  be  receiv'd  as  a  gene- 
ral one,  which  is  not  geneially  true, 
ii.  130. 
Mazarine  J  the  ways  of  his  advancement,  i. 

371' 
/Indices,  of  the  title  of  that  family  to  Tuf- 

cany,  ii.  'c^. 

Memheri  of  parliament  fent  to  fervc  for  the 

whole   nation,    not   for    a   particular 

borough,  &c.  ii.  370. 

Inftrudlions  are  often  given  to  them,  H, 

374- 
Have  no  power  before  they  are  chofen, 

nor  ever  could,  if  tbofe  that  fend  them 

had  it  not  in  themfelves,  ii.  375. 

Muft  take  care  that  the  common-wealth 
receives  no  detriment  by  their  votes, 
ii.  376. 

A  few  poiTibly  may  be  corrupted,  ii.  379, 
]['hrce?iary  arn)y,   vid.  Soldiery. 

Their  bufinefs  is  to  keep  on  their  em- 
ployment, i.  280. 

Soldiers,  always  want  fidelity  or  cou- 
rage, i.  298.  400. 

Courtiers,  will  expofe  not  only  honour?, 
but  even  iiifl ice  to  fu!e,  i.  367,  368. 

Wretches,  their  power  at  court,  i.  37  j. 

Augufius  Cicfar  had    thirty  legions   of 
them  to   execute  his  commands,    ii. 
206. 
Merit ^  men  rarely  make  a  right  eflimate 
of  tbeii  own,  i.  336, 

The  way  of  advancement  to  honour,  i. 
390. 

"What  preferves,  and  what  aboliihes  it, 
i.  395. 
Jlli(.k/e- Gemot!  were  general  aflemblies  of 
the  noble  and  free  men,  ii.  245,  256, 
317. 

They  fct  up  feven  niagiftrates  over  the 
Heptarchy,  ii.  246. 

Of  what  they  were  in  the  beginning  of 
the  Saxons  reign,  ii.  318. 
ii^^iltiadet,  his  defire  to  wear  an  olive-gar- 
lajid  for  his  viclory  at  Marathon,  and 
the  anfwer  given  to  him,  ii.  445. 
Hflinijiers,  according  to  the  temper  and  ge- 
nius of  the  prince,  i.  13,  14, 


Mir.ipen,  cf  the  devil,    who,  i.  7^  97, 

103.  ii.  82,  93,  95. 
Of   God,    who,    i.  96,  97,  99,  235^ 

286.  ii.  81,  93,  95. 
Muft  receive   their  dignity  from  a  title 

not  common  to  all,  it.  86. 
Every   man  by   his    works   will  declare 

whofe  he  is,  ii.  92. 
The  devils  of   a  lower  order,  ii.   176. 
Of  Cod,    how   they   may   become  the 

worft  of  men,  ii.  192, 
What  fort  have  feldom  efcap'd  punifti- 

ment,  il.  196. 
Of  the  devil,    have  always  carry'd  en 

their  defigns  by  fraud,  ii.  325. 
Mif^^kci  in  ptinifhmen'.s  carefully  repairM 

by  honours,  i.  215. 
Seditions,  tumults  and   wars  arife  from 

thence,  i.  309. 
None  in   Sparta   after  Lycurgus's  laws 

were  eflablifli'd,  i.  310. 
That  fome  have  fallen  into  by  the  forni 

of  writs,    fummoning  perfons  to  ap- 
pear before  the  king,    re£tify*d,   ii. 

3c;o. 
Mithridateiy    what    reckoned    the    greateft 

danger  of  war  with  him,  i.  199. 
Monarchs,  who  have  their  right  from  God 

and  nature,  i.  17. 
Ought  to  confuk  the  piiblick  good,  i.  6j, 

68. 
How  mod  came  to  their  dignities,  i.  23S» 
Are  not  above  the  law,  ii.  129. 
Monarchy,  paternal,  over  whom  exercis'd. 

Whence  fo  call'd,  i.  38. 

For  whom  beft,  i.  107. 

No  natural  propenfity  in  men  and  bcafla 
to  it,  i.  166,   167. 

How  Ariftotle  commands  it,  i.  183, 184, 

Mix'd,  regulated  by  law,  i.  189,  195, 
262,  274. 

Of  Rome,  at  firft  not  abfolute,  i.  220, 

Moft  have  fuffer'd  far  greater  changes 
than  Rome,  i.  223. 

Macedonian  fell  all  to  pieces  after  the 
death  of  Alexander,  i.  241,  331. 

In  what  fenfe  faid  to  be  natural,  i.  267. 

A  peaceable  one  in  Peru  for  12  genera* 
tions,  i.  335. 

The  French  has  been  full  of  blood  and 
flaughter,  i.  278,  350,  351. 

The  gentleft  more  heavy  than  any  cora- 
mon-wealth,  i.  357. 

AH  fubjedl  to  civil  wars,  i.  357. 

Well  regulated,  when  its  powers  are  li- 
mited by  law,  i.  414. 

The  juftice  of  them  eiiabJifli'd  by  com- 
mon con  fent,  i.  146,  148,  162^277, 
315,  416. 

Why  fo  call'd,  i.  2j8,  249,  411' 

M(jnarcb^g 


An  Aiphabencal  TABLE. 


Monarchy^  nothing  in  the  nature  and  in- 
ftitacion  of  It  that  obliges  nations  to 
bear  with  its  exorbitances,  ii.    n. 

What  fort  was  difpleafing  to  Samuel,  and 
a  rejeflion  of  God,  ii,  2S. 

Pjternal,  overthrown  by  Filmer,  ii.  46. 

Not  univerfaily  evil,  ii,  54. 

Where  it  is  regular^  kings  can  neither 
makenor  change  laws,  ii.  113. 

Ucne  eftabhHi'd  among  us  in  Julius  Cs- 
lar's  time,  ii.  210. 

JWix'd,  what  the  beft  way  to  fupport  itj 


u.  311. 


What  has  given  beginning,  growth  and 
continuance  to  ail  the  mix'd  ones  in 
the  world,  ii,  564. 

That  not  free,  which  is  regulated  by  a 
Jaw  not  to  be  broken  without  the  guile 
of  perjury,  ii.  3S2. 

When  the  mix'd  monarchies  bfgan  to  be 
terHbly  rh:>kcn,  ii.  3S6. 
M-jnty..  Charles  VII.  of  France  rais'd    it 

by  his  own  auchujlty,  ii.  3S6. 
Mofes  and  Aaron,  the  firft  rulers  of  the 
people,  neither  of  the  eldeft  tribe^  rwr 
eldeft  line,  i.  45,  46. 

Ki£  admirable  gius,  i,  49,  187.  ii.  110, 
III. 

Had  not  the  name,  ci  power  of  a  king, 
i.  123,  172.  ii.  S 

Cave  the  people  leave  to  chufe  their  own 
inagiftrates,  i.  345. 

Divided  the  Hebrews  under  fevera!  cap- 
tains, i.  2^1. 

Povcer  infupportable  to  him,  ii.  lio. 

His  charadler,  i.  417.  ii.  114,  330. 

Wlifither  we  ought  to  conform  to  his  la«r, 
ii.  2i8,  219,  220. 
Multitud-f  what  right  it  has  to  change  a 
tyrannical  government,  i,  23, 

Composed  of  free  men  ;  the  power  that 
is  plac'd  in  them,  ii.  132. 

N(»ie  can  be  feditious  till  a  common- 
wealth be  eflabUlh'd,  i.  142. 

Thofe  that  enter  into  contrafts,  a£l  ac- 
cording to  their  own  will,  i.  143. 

Where  it  brings  confulion,  i.  297. 

Is  the  glory  and  ftrengih  of  every  prince^ 

I.    ^v^5. 

May  have  its  fears  as  well  as  tyrants,  i, 

413. 
Confers  on  the  pnnce  all  the  power  he 

has,  i.  442. 
Whit  is  natural   thereto  in  relation  to 

government,  I.  449. 
MM'deyen  wilful,  the   horns  of  the  aUar 

gave  ni*  proteftion  to  fuch,  ii.  84, 

M^pirutoi  ftate,  i.  12, 


N. 


^l  ylmeSy    are  not  eiTential 
^    Orates,  ii.  zi 


to  rsagt- 
185,  286. 
Of  fovereign  Lord,  £  e.  confiftent  with 

liberty,  ii.  293,  294. 
Nuihing  of  majefty  among  the  Roman* 
and  Grecians   to  a  fingle   perfon,  il. 
293,  294. 
There  mult  be  fome  us'd  in  all  publicte 

tranfad^ions,  ii.  352. 
Not  to  be  regarded  fo  much  as  the  power, 
ii.  372. 
I.^attons,  what  their  rights  are,  i.  10.  ii» 
144,   191,    200,    231,    234,    238, 

2^1,    308,    372,    3S9. 

That  went  from  Babylon,  how  mariy^ 
'•   32>  36,  41,    4^>    5S>  7i>  J32, 

Natural  for  them  to  chufe  governor?,  u 

^J02,   117,    124,  277.  ii.  loi,  191. 

Northern,  their  governments  how  in- 
Hituted,  i,  140,  42S.  ii.  255. 

Free,  never  con^uer'd  but  with  difficul- 
ty, i.  199. 

Oppref,'d,  can  never  grow  v/anton,  I. 
217. 

None  fjfe  without  valoUr  and  i!renglh^ 
i.  222.  ii.  238. 

Foreign,  call'd  in  by  fome  princes  to  de- 
flroy  their  own  people,  i,  381. 

Some  fell  their  children,  i.  299, 

Slight  matters  fometimes  biing  them  In- 
to  confufion.      Inftances   thereof,    i, 

.    329>  330- 
When  they  are  moft  unquiet,  i.   347^ 

348,  373- 

The  v.'ifeft  have  fet  bound?  to  their  prin- 
ces power,  ^c.  i.  436,  451. 
43. 

Their  liberties  ai-p  from  God  and  nature^ 
i.  440    ii.   Hi 

Where  they  have  taken  the  cxtremefl 
ccurfes,  i.  451. 

Owe  nothing  to  kings  till  they  are  kings, 
ii.  34,   155,   15&. 

What  fet  hmits  to  their  patience^  ii.  33^ 
40. 

What  inclines  them  to  fet  up  govern- 
ments, ii.  39, 

When  all  were  governM  by  tyrants,  i\», 
58. 

Their  fafety  ought  not  to  depend  on  the 
will  of  their  princes,   ii.  I23. 

What  are  free  and  \vhat  not,  ii.  134, 
185. 

Thofe  that  had  no  kings  had  pov/er,  ii»' 
207,   203. 

V/hat  (hev/s  befl  their  wifdom  and  vir- 
tue, or  their  vices  and  iijlly,  ii.  217, 

E  c  s  Kdfirit^ 


11.  47,- 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE: 

t^adontt  wherein  their  failure  has  been  too  Noahy  when  he  went  ont  of  the  art,  Go<l 

frequent,  ii.  224.  gave  him  a  law  fufficient  for  the  ftate 

This  divided  into    even  kingdoms,  ii.  of  things  at  that  time,  ii.  7. 

247.  None  but  his  right  heir  can  have  a  title 

None  can  have  a  power  over  any,  other-  to  an  univerfal  patriarchal  right,  ii, 

wife  than  de  jure,  or  de  fa£lo,  ii.  aSl,  77,  152. 

Obedience  due   from  the  whole  body,  Kohility  of  Rome  extirpated,  i.  222. 


v/hat,  ii.  301. 
Their  liberties  don't  rife  from  the  grants 

of  princes,  ii.  306. 
Delight  in  the  peace  and  juftice  of  a  good 

governmentj  ii.  307. 
"What  the  moft  ready  way  to  effe£l  their 

ruin,  ii.  313,  348,  349,  360. 
"When  oblig'd  to  remove  the  evils  they 

lie  under,  ii.  340,  341. 
None  can  have  an  equal  within  itfelf,  ii. 

345- 
Orie  that  is  powerful  cannot  recede  from 

its  own  right,  ii.  345. 
What  king  none  ever  wants  that  has  a 

fovereign  power,  ii.  354. 
"What  thofe  ought  to  do  that  are  fo  happy 

as  to  have  good  kings,  ii.  362. 
Great  ones  never  ordain'd  by  God  to  be 

fljves,  ii.  372. 
Naiwalizationf  Rome  was  for  a  general 

one,  ii.  288. 
Negati've  voice,  how  far  it  Is  fald  to  ex- 
tend, ii.  236,  237. 
Le  roy  s'avifera,  what  meant  by  it,  ii. 

296. 


The  Roman  power  chiefly  in  them  after 

the  e:!fpulfion  of  the  kings^  i.  239, 
Hold  the  balance  between  the  king  and 

the  commons  ;  when  and  how  weak- 
ened, i.  351,  356. 
Of  Arragon's  faying  to  their  new-made 

king,  i.  431. 
What  our  anceftors  meant  by  them,  ii» 

248,  249. 
The  ftrength  of  the  government  when 

plac'd  in  them,  ii.  249,  313. 
Sometimes  cafl'd  inftnita  multitudo,  il. 

^53»  256,  258. 
Knighthood  always  efteem'd  noble,  ii. 

253. 
In  France,  ^c,  ofwhatefteem,  ii.  25  j. 
The  prefent  titular  has  no  affinity  to  the 

antient  nobility  of  England,  ii.  257, 
Of  Venice  and  Switzerland  what  makes 

them  fo,  ii.  260. 
Their  virtue  and  power  formerly  kept 

the  kings  within  the  hmits  of  the  law, 

ii.  311. 
Many  have  loft  their  eftates  and  intcreft 

now,  ii.  312. 


/,V»,  the  power  of  the  ftate  over  him,  i.    Noli  projequi,  faid  to  be  annex'd  to  the 

perfon  of  the  king,  ii.  355, 
Norman  kings,    fwore   to   govern 


23,  24.  11.  70. 
His  endeavour  to  make  a  woman  of  a 
man,  i.  86,   100. 
To  tear  up  virtue  by  the  roots,  i. 
100,  255,  3S4. 
Condemn'd  to  be  put  to  death,  i.  258. 

ii.  95. 
What  fort  of  vermin  he  encdurag'd,  i. 

261. 
Setthe  city  on  firft,  i.  322,  380.  ii.  91. 
Dy'd  by  the  hand  of  a  flave,  i,  332.  ii. 

70. 
His  ch3ra£ter,  ii.  126. 
His  madnefs  not  to  be  cur*d  but  by  his 

death,  ii.  340. 
Nimrcd  the  firit  king,  i.   30,  31,  39.  ii. 

6. 
Uforp'd  the  power  over  his  father,  £'<:, 

i.  33.  ii.  12. 
Heir  to  no  man  as  king,  i,  55. 
Stbin  by  Ninus,  i.  53. 
No  right  can  be  deriv'd  from  him,  i.  73, 
77»  85.  _ 

Ereded  his  kingdom  contrary  to  pater- 
nal right,  i.  441.  ii.  208. 
Noab,  bore  no  image  of  a  king,  i.  30.  ii, 

20S. 
HJs  dividing  of  Afii,  Europe  and  Africa 

among  his  fons,  1.  52. 


by  the 
fame  laws  as  the  Saxons  had,  ii.  247, 

379- 
Notionsy  common,  what  are  agreed  to  by 

all  mankind,  i.  6ij» 
O. 

OAtb  of  allegiance  us'd  in  the  king« 
dom  of  Arragon,  i.  138. 
Agreements  between  prince  and  people 

always  confirmed  by  them,  i.  321. 
How  kings  may  be  abfolv'd  from  them, 

ii.  136,  137. 
Its  force  confifts  in  the  declar'd  fenfe  of 

thofe  who  give  it,  ii.  137,  303,  304. 
Scarce  any  prince  broke  it  but  to  his 

ruin,  ii.  141. 
All  either  voluntary  or  involuntary,  ii, 

14T. 
Ought  to  be  performed  in  reverence  to 

the  religion  of  it,  ii.  142. 
What  to  be  done,  where  the  obfervation 

of  it  would  be  grievous,  ii.  148. 
How  the  judges  are  bound  by  theirs,  ii, 

194,  195. 
Wherein  that  of  the  crown  bad  not  been 

kept,  ii.  igSt 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


9ath,   What  kings  are   oblig'd  to  do  by 
them,  ii.  229,  379. 

How  far  thofe  of  allegiance  bind  private 
perfons,  ii,  306. 
Obedience,  a£live  and  pafliVe,  i.  15.  ii.  180. 

Where   due  and  not  due,    i.  66,    99, 
135.  ii.  4,  12,  34,  100,   loi,  301. 

How  far  a  good  man  will  pay  it  to  hie 
prince,  i.  363,  364. 

The  effefls  of  its  difcipline  among  the 
Romans,  i.  393. 

To  higher  powers,  St.  Paul's  words  fa- 
vour all  forts  of  governments  as  well 
as  monarchy,  ii.  73,  79,  80,  82, 
83,   100,   lOI. 

Why  it  ihould  be  paid,  Il.-gi, 

Is  not  due  to  that  which  is  not  law,  ii. 

93j  .94.  95>  176,  177- 
The  prince  owes  it  to  the  laws  as  well  as 

the  meaneft  fubjedl,  ii.  113. 
Due  to  parents,  from  whence  it  arlfes,  ii, 

28S. 
Simple  and  unconditional,  to  what  king 

we  all  owe  it,  ii.  355. 
.  (Shjecl,  the  only  worthy  one  of  maa*s  defire, 

i.  no. 
CbIlga:ion  arifing  from  benefits  can  only  be 

to  thofe  who  confer  them,  i.  76, 
Of  gratitude,  to  whom  due,  ii.  13. 
How  far  the  extent  of  It  can  be  known, 

ii.  34. 
Henry  VIII.  own'd  it  lay  on  him  right- 
ly to  ufe  the  power  with  which  he  was 

entrufted,  ii.  121. 

Occupation f  the  meaning  of  the  word,  i, 

3^7. 
Offa,  vid,  Saxons. 

Officers,  great  one's  in  armies  think  only 

of  enriching  themfelves,  i.  400. 

How  their  authority  and  power  is  to  be 
regulated,  ii.  loi. 

Ought  to  have  their  places  for  the  peo- 
ples good,  ii.  230. 

Frequently  put  to  death  by  the  Atheni- 
ans, &c.  ii.  320. 
Offices,  what  fits  men  for  the  execution  of 
them,  i.  114,   115. 

Thofe  that  buy  will  make  the  moft  of 
them,  i.  368. 

Or  muft  be  turn'd  out  as  a  fcandal  to 
the  court,  i.  369. 

By  what  means  they  have  been  often  ob- 
tain'd,  i.  379,  371. 
Cpprcffion,  fcmetimes  makes  nations  out- 
rageous, i.  217. 

Does  people  fuch  injury,  as  can  never  be 
pardon'd,  ii.   11. 
Order,  when  inverted,  introduces  extreme 
confufion,  i.  1 12. 

Wherein  it  principally  confifts,  r,  112, 
130,   133,   141,   187. 

The  effe(5t  of  it,  i,  188,  197, 


Order  good,  not  wanting  in  Venice,  i.  200. 
Nor  among  the  Romans,  i,  203. 
Being  eftabllfli'd,  makes  good  men. 


1.  301. 


The  beft  fometlmes  fubverted  by  malice 
and  violence,  i.  213. 
Ordinance,  what  is  blafphemy  to  impute  to 
God,  i.  7.2. 

Civil  and  human,  i.  143. 

God's  general,    and  the  particular  or- 
dinance of  all  focieties,  i.  513. 

Of  God,  appointed   for  the  diliribution 
of  juftice,  i.  323,  324. 

Several  tending  to  the  fame  end,  ii.  82, 

Original,  no  man  knows  his  own,  i,   50, 

60,  64,  448.  ii.  152. 
Contradl,    i.    109,    in,    112,    114, 

116,    119,    126.    133,    136,  144, 

146,  451.  ii.  35. 
Right  muft  be  regulated  according  to  It, 

i.  444. 
Where  it  would  be  of  no  value,  I,  450. 
Of  nations   almoll  wholly  unknown  to 

us,  Ii.  6. 
Ours  is  deduc'd  both  from  the  Romans 

and  Saxons,  ii.  242,  291. 
Ojiracifm  of  the  Athenians,  no  diflionour, 

nor  accounted  as  a  puni/hment,  i.  250. 
Nothing  favour'd  fo  much  of  injuftice, 

i.  412. 
Ofho,  had  the  empire  given  him,  by  whom, 

i.  332. 
Was  a  felf-murderer,  i.  332. 
Why  he  was  advanc'd,  i.  337. 
Out'laiv,  or  lawlefs,  often  apply'd  to  the 

wicked,  but  never  to  the  jufl,  ii.  8« 


P. 


Pj^pal  poivcr,  the  foundation  of  it,  i. 

The  civil  difTenfions  In  Germany  pro- 
ceeded from  thence,  ii.  105. 
Pretends  to  the  power  of  abfolution,  if* 

^37-  .     . 

Her  excommunications,  bruta  fulmina, 

ii.  139. 
Papips,  their  kindnefs   to  the   proteftants 

inftanc'd  in,  ii,  365,   366. 
Paradoxes,  many  of  them  true,  i.  103, 
Pardons,  faid  to  be  only  the  bounty  of  the 
prerogative,  ii.  198,   355. 
The  meaning  of  a  general  one  at  a  co- 
ronation, ii.  199. 
Where  granted  againft  the  oath  of  the 

crown,  ii.  199. 
Granted  by  z€t  of  parliament,  ii.  199, 

200. 
None  for  a  man  condemn'd  upon  an  ap* 
peal,  ii.  356. 

.  E  e  3  Pardms^ 


An  AlphabeuGal  TABLE. 

Pardorti,  tlieking  can't  always  pardon  in  Parties  threaten  a  national  ruin,  ii.  '♦ii, 

cafes  of  trealVn,  ii.  357.  PaJJiom,  ewery  one  has  them,  few  know 

Parents,   how   oblig-d   by  nature   to  feek  how  to  moderate  thfm,  5i.  3315. 

their  children?  good,  ii.  3,  9.  Put  princes  upon  the  moil  unjuft  oefighs, 

Parliaments,  the  Infliti-.tion   of  them,  and  H.  350. 


for  what,  i.  13S,  13: 


The  law  is  without  paflion,  ii.  T13. 


The  fettling  and  tiansferring  of  crowns    Patents,  began  long  after  the  coming  of  the 

lodg'd  in  them,  i.  146,  2.36,  447.  Normans,  ii.  250. 

In  France,  fet  up  to  receive  appeals  from    Pater  I'^itri^^  the  title  the:ecf  coniider'd. 


other  courtF,  and  to  judge  fovereignly, 

nnw  of  little  ufe,  i.  :i43,  426. 
A  free  and  well  regulated  one  to  chufe 

minifters  of  fiate,  i,  275,  276. 
Their  great  power  in  all  the  kingdoms 

that  came  from  the  north,  i.  421. 
Dedar'd    Henry    III.   of   France  fallen 

from  the  crown,  I.  421;. 
How  they  may  be  made  ufeiefs,  ii.  49. 
England  never  wanted  them,  ii-  72,  73. 
The    word    parliament  came    from    the 

f  rench,  but  the  power  was  always  in 

ourfelve?,  ii,  85. 
Henry  VIII.  confeffes  them  to  be  the 

law-makers,  ii.  121,  233. 
Doubtful  cafes  refer'd  to  them,  ii.  122, 

197. 
By  writs  compel  the  king  to  perform  the 

conditions   of   the  great  charter,    ii, 
140,   141. 


I.  51,  100,  ici. 
By  k-lling  a  tyrant  how  faid  to  become 

{^y  i.   z,^,  60,  66,  95. 
Paternal  r;gl  f,  Abraham  arrogated  none  to 

himfel^;  i.  32,   33. 
Impofiible  to  be  known,  i.  41,  50,  56, 

58,  121. 
AH  the  kingdoms  of   the  earth  efta- 

bli/lr'd  upon  it,  i.  c;6. 
Government  of  Rome  not  paternal,  i, 

64. 
Can't  be  confer'd  on  princes,  i.  85,  93, 

149. 
To  whom  it  belongs,  i.  52,  124,  127, 

ii.45. 
In  what  the  Hebrews  had  no  regard  to  It, 

i.  442. 
Is  a  meer  fiftion,  i.  447. 
Is  from  nature,  and  incommunicable,  ii* 
I. 


Have  given   the  crown  to   whom   th^y    Patriarchal  right,  women  and  children  have 


pleas'd,    ii.    ii;l,    139,    161,    238, 
252,    253,    261,    273,    2-5,    277, 

300- 
Judge  of  difputes  arifing  from  the  chil- 
dren of  royal  marriages,  ii.  168,233. 
Have  the  file  power  to  explain  and  cor- 

rtcl  laws,  1!.   200,  20lj  236,  238, 

252,  299. 
Oug^it  of  light  to  be  annually,  ii.  236, 

320,   321. 
from  whence  they  derive  their  authori- 
ty, ii.  240,    341,    275,  277,   314, 

— 320. 
Have  refus'd   to  be  difTolv'd    till   their 

work  was  nniHi'd,   ii.    319. 
Not  impeccable  or  infallible,  but  lefs  fub- 

ject   to  error  thjn  feme   princes,  ii. 

32r,  324.  360. 
Our  lives  and  liberties  depend   upon  this 

court,  ii.  359. 
\Vh.U  the  great  Burleigh  and  Sir  Tho. 

Moor  faid  of  their  power,  ii.  ''''4. 
If  they  make  unjuit  laws,  their  pofkiiry 

will  fr.fFer,  ii.   379. 
How  diSicuk  they  are  to  be  brib'd,   ii. 

379' 
Tc  have  their  rolls  in  their  offices,  not 

a  meer  cerf?rony,  ii.  3S3. 
What  kings  have  had  continual  difputes 

with  them,  ii.  388. 
Parties,  what  certainly  dividas    ihej  nation 

into  thtn^,  ii.  J72. 


!t,  according  to  Filmer,  i,  3, 
The  abfurdity  ofit,  i.  25,  26,  27,  73, 

74-  "•  77>  37^- 

All  pretence  to  it  defiroy'd,  i.  32,  39, 
44,  52.  ii.  241. 

Muft  accrue  to  every  f.nher,  i.  36. 

Either  divifible  or  indivifible,  i.  41,   f;6» 
Patriarchal  ficwer  different  from  the  regal, 

i.  28,  29,   103. 
Peace,  there  can  be  none  without  juftice, 
i.  24,  225. 

Defirab!^  by  a  ftate  coufiituted  for  it,  i. 
222. 

Slavilh,  i.  223,  224. 

Whit  men  have  in  their  graves,  1,  224. 

What  the  Spaniards  fettled  in  the  Weft- 
Indies,  i,  224. 

Thf  nime  of  it  given  to  dpfclation,  i, 

224.  373.  374,_  375.  177-. 
The  fid   one  whiuh  Frsnce  en'oy'd  fof 

five  or  fix  ages,  1.  348,   349.   35^- 
In  Spain  to  vvh,it  imputed,  i,  3^4. 
The  terms  cfl'er'd,  if  good,  like  t'">  be 
obferv^d  ;    if  bad,  will  foi^^n   be   bso- 
ken.  ii.  302- 
Fee'i,    aft   for    themfclves    in   th»^!f  own 

houfe,  ii.  375. 
Pcmhrok  ,  a  late  Earl  of  that  noble  family, 

his  fa;,  irg,  i.  341. 
PfJjJe,   not  oiiginaily   created    for  kings  to 
rc:g8  ovsr  them,,  i.  S. 

Pispk^ 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


ti'p^-i,  whether  they  chufa  governors,    i. 
21,    loa,    109,    137,    149,    i6i, 
162. 
Scripture- inf.ances  for  the  proof  it,  I. 

^7^'  431-  .... 

The  choice  of  the  confiitution   is  from 

them,    i.   151,    234,  235,  450.  ii. 

155,  208. 
Kings  receive  their  right  from  them,  i. 
'     156,  447. 
How  God  deals  with  a  people  when  he 

intends  to  exalt  them,  i.  203. 
Of  Rome,  their  fad  degeneracy,  i.  204, 

205. 
Their  right  to  appeals,    i.  212,  220, 

234.  257.^ 
Acting  according  to  their  own  wii!,  ne- 
ver fet  up  snworthy  men,  unlefs  thu>' 

miftake,  i.  269. 
The  body  of  them  the  publick  defence, 

i.  282,  29c,   291. 
None  ever  well  defended  but  thofe  who 

fight  for  themfelves,  i.  290,  291. 
In  civil  contefts  they  t4ually  fufter,  i. 

311,  312. 
Whether  to  be  judges  in  their  own  cafes, 

i.  321,  322. 
When  generally  corrupted,  the  event  is 

always  fhe  ereftion  of  a  tyrant,  i,  327, 

360. 
Their  condition   where  tolerable  under 

very  cruel  emperors,  i.  346. 
Their  hating  of  cruel  princes,  and  they 

them,  i.  387. 
Muft  neceffarily  have  all  the  power  ori- 
ginally in  themfelves,  i.  415,  431, 

432.  ii.  209. 
Their  right  of  looking  into  matters  of 

government,  fefc.  ii.  22,   115 — 118, 

183,  319^  320*  34-i»   342,   343-.. 

Can  never  fall  into  nonage  or  dotage,  ii, 
128. 

Did  never  part  with  all  their  power  to 
kings,  ii.  157. 

May  govern  by  themfelves,  ii.    147, 

Their  whole  body  not  fubjed  to  the 
commands  of  the  magiftrate,  ii.  301. 

In  their  colleftive  body  always  continue 
as  free  as  the  inward  thoughts  of  a 
man,  ii.  304. 

They  certainly  perifh  who  fuffer  them- 
felves to  be  oppiefi'd,  ii.  339. 

That  are  not  free,  can't  fubltitute  De- 
legates, ii.  36S. 
Vid.  Nation  and  multitude. 
Perfffiion,  fimple  and  relative,  ii.  2!8. 
ferjecution  among  the  fiift  Chtiftian  em- 
perors, i.  194. 
Ferjia,  their  kin^s  reign'd  from  the  Indies 
ro  the  Hellefpont,  i.  51. 

The  decrees  of  thefe  kings  pafs'd  for 
laws,  J.  154. 


Ferjij,  the  jiift  fentence  of  the  princes  about 
D'niel,  i.  191, 
Torn  to  pieces  by  the  fury  of  two  bro- 
thers, i.  248. 
Under  what  ill  conduifl  and    dif^ipline 
their  army  was,  i.  299. 
Pitition,  the  haughty  Romans  condescend- 
ed to  join  in  one  with  their  tribunes 
to  their  di£lator,  ii.  294. 
Pharamond,    his  race  in   France,    an   ac- 
count of  it,  ii.  160. 
Pbaraob,  his  monarchy  an  a£l  of  tyranny, 

i.  45. 
Pharijees,  their  fuperfllrion,  ii.  177. 
i  ijilo,  to  what  he  imputes  the  inftitution 
of  kingly  government  in  ITrae',  i.  171, 
Phi't'jfopby  tru3,  perfectly  conform,^ ble  with 
what  is  taught  by  men  divi:;ely   in- 
fpir'd,  i.  112. 
rbocio'i,  of  his  death,  i.  251. 
Picenicians  fettling  in  Africa,  brought  their 

liberty  with  them,  ii.  289. 
Plato,  a  commendjtion  of  him,    i.   102, 
IC3. 
His  principles  of  government,  i.    108, 

112,  114,  115,  122. 
His  opinion,  who  ought  to  be  advanc'd 
above  all,  i.  114,   173,  416, 
P/<2yi,  the  confequence  of  them,  i.  205, 

225,  261,  279. 
Pkbeiam  elefted  to  the  chief  magiflracies, 
i.  209,  239,  245,  358. 
Their  j-aloufy  of  the  Patricians,  i.  309, 
Polity,  its  fignification,  i.  119. 
Po//V/fa/ fcience  abftrufe,  i.  167. 
Porrpty,  his  caufe  more  phufible,  but  Lis 
dcfigns  as  bad  as  Caeiar's,  i.  37S. 
The  firft  ftep  to  his  ruin  was  by  violat- 
ing the  laws,  i.  427,  428. 
Popular  government  for  what  people  beft, 
i.  107. 
No  where  difprais'd  by  Arirtotle,  i.  184. 
The  extent  of  its  conquefts,  i.  1S6,  195, 

228,  229. 
Of  Rome,  how  fupported,  i.  228,  229. 
Something  of  monarchical  in  them,  i, 

238. 
Can  never  be  upheld  Hut  by  virtue,  u 

263,  364. 
Pcfiible,  'but  not  eafily  to  fall  into  cor- 
ruption, Gff.  i.  267,  361,  363,  370^ 
Improperly  what, and  what  in  the  Ilrideft 

fenfe,  i.   268. 
Preferves  peace,  and  manages  war  beft, 

i.  276,  C77,  278. 
Every  man  concern'd  in  them,  i.  282, 

379>  390. 
States  remarkable  for  peace,  i.  293,294. 
Excellent  men  are   generally  chofen   in 

them,  i.  303. 
What  leditions  are  feldom  feen  in  them, 

i.  309,  311. 

E  e  4  Popular^ 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Topuhr,  how  ruin'(3,  i.  327. 
Encourage  induftry,  i.  377. 
Never  hurt  private  perfuns  but  thro'  er- 
rors, i.  379,  413, 
"When  they  began  Co  appear  in  the  world, 

ii.  65. 
Obedience  due  to  them  as  well  as  to  mo- 
narchies, it.  78,  79. 
"Portugaly  wl  0  accou'.ited  king  thereof  by 

tha  EngliQi  court,  ii.  353. 
Poverty,  no  inconvenience  in  it,  if  virtue 
be  honour'd,  ii.  364. 
The  miferabl'  condition  of  Greece,  Italy, 

&c.  \.  373,  375,  376. 
When  it  grew  odious  in  Rome,  ii.  51. 
Poivcr  (all  'uft  fovereign)  from  the  people, 

i-  94>    137^  i3^>    Hi>  i57>  315* 

43i>  43^-  .     ,        .  .„       ^ 

How  hi  that  hds  it  is  the  minifter  of 

God,  1.96,  98.  192.  ii.  236,  308. 
Not  an  advantage  but  a  burden,  i,  122, 

123. 
Delegated,    to  whom   refer'd,    i.    137, 

139,   141. 
The  root  and  foundation  of  it,  i.  141. 
Civil,  an  human  or-iinance,   143. 
Of  the  people  fu^jed  to  no  rule  but  their 

ow;i  will;   t.  213. 
Of  the  Ron-isns  after  the  expulfnn  of 

the  kings,  Ciiefly  in  the  nobility,  i, 

^39- 
Na;oraily  of  a  fi-^-rce  and  afpiring  temper, 

i.  26 ". 

Scivereign  and  limited,  i.  317,   351. 

"What,  m  ail  the  kingioms  peopled  from 

the  north,  i.  421- 
rjoft  Ofe  wh-n  ieaft  envied  and  hated, 

i.  422. 
If  i"-   h  >s  been  divided,  it  may  be  fo  in 

inli)iitum,  i.  444.. 
The    Roman    emperors   endeavour'd   to 

make  their  power  hereditary,  i.  447. 
The  ill  eFecls  of  urlimited  might  caufe 

it  to  be  mrderated,  ii.  6. 
What  m-^'  be  lawfully  reufted,  ii.  17, 

18. 
What  prince  ought  to  have  it,  and  what 

not,  ii.  70. 
Wilt  thcu  not  be  afraid  of  the  power  ? 

what  meant  by  it,  ii.  79. 
Direflive  and  coercive,  ii.  93,  94,   loi. 
Why  it  onjnt  to  be  liniited,  ii.  107. 
Of  the  king  is  the  power  of  the  law,  ii, 

121,  224,  236. 
Wh'^t  requifite  in  every  ftate,  ii.  131. 
None  can  be  juu   but  what  is  good,  15, 

204. 
Over  nations  muft  either  be  de  jure,  or 

de  fade,  ii,  281. 
Of  the   king   various   according  to   the 

conftituticus  of  cveiy  flate,  ii.  2S3, 

£S4. 


Power,  nothing  can  make  that  inherent, 
which  is  only  delegated,  ii.  319. 

Reftrain'd,  when  it  began  to  grow  info- 
lent.     Inftances,  ii.  335,  336. 

Where  'tis  not  univerfal,  it  is  not  in- 
herent, ii.  355. 

How  that  of  every  county,  city  and  bo- 
rough of  England  is  regulated,  ii.  369. 

What  muft  be  in  thofe  that  a£l  by  a  de- 
legated power,  ii.  374,  375. 

Where  it  is  plac'd  by  well  conftituted 
governments,  ii.  377. 
PraBice  cannot  declare   the   greatnefs    of 
authority,  ii,  24. 

The  confequence  of  fuch  a  dc£lrine,  ii. 

Of  nations  to  their  fovereigns,  ii.  293. 
Prayers  and  tears  the  only  arms  of  the  firft 

Chriftians,  ii.  60. 
Frcfermsnis,  by  what  means  men  now  rife 

to  them,  i.  371, 
Given  to  thofe  that  were  moft  propenfe 

to  flavery,  i.  391. 
Where  obtiin'd  only  by  virtue,  5i.  395, 
Prerogative  oi  kings,  what,  i.  3,  II4. 
Of  birth,  i.  49. 
Heredit  wy  of  dominion,  i.  105. 
i-A\  grar.ied  by  confcnt  of  the  whole  fo- 

ciety,  i.  134. 
What  the  moft  glorious,  ii.  34,  22gj 
The  utmoft  extent  of  it.  What,  ii.  127, 

229. 
Only  inftituted  to  preferve  liberty,    ii. 

18S,  220. 
What  is  not  the  gracious  bounty  of  it, 

ii   T99,  387. 
Who  thought  whatever  could  be  detraft- 

ed  from  the  liberty   of   the    nation, 

W'  uld  ferve  to  advance  the  prerogative, 

ii.  3S8._  ^ 
Princes,  ordain'd  for  the  good  of  the  people, 

i.  67,   101,   T04,  106,   108. 
Ought  to  be  rich  in  virtue  and  wifdom, 

i.  113,   114.  ii.  141. 
All  things  vary  acccroing  to  the  humour 

of  thofe  that  govern,    i.    190,  192, 

,^93;  ^94- 
Very  few  of  an  inflexible  virtue,  i   266. 

Killing  one  to  obtain  the  crown,  i.  65, 
66.  348,  349. 

F.ifily  mpob'd  on  by  pretenders,  i.  367„ 

^y  fetting  up  their  own  intereft  becrme 
enemies  to  the  publick,  i.  379,  380, 
382,  387.  ii.  5.     ^  _ 

God's   vicegerents,  doing  their  duty,  i. 

385. 
The  beft,  by  what  means  drawn  out  of 

the  way  uf  juftice,  i.  252.  ii.  117. 

For  they  have  their  failings,  ii.  196. 

Virtuous  ones  will  have  virtuous  coiirts, 

J-  l^9i  370. 

Princes^ 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Princet,  evil  ones  juft  the  contrary,  i.  261, 

265*  367.  37o»  39V  394;  395. . 
How  they  foon  lofe  their  dominions,  1. 

304,  305,  306,  346,  347. 

Seek  the  deftruftion  of  their  belt  fub- 
jefts,  i.  347,   388.  ii.  80,  81. 

Some  confider  nations,  as  grafiers  do 
their  herds  and  flocks,  i.  385. 

May  corrmit  many  errors  in  the  begin- 
ning of  their  reigns,  to  the  ruin  of 
themfelves  and  people.  Inftances,  i. 
404,  405. 

The  treachery  and  perjury  of  lome,  1. 

438. 
What  thofe  that  govern  them  inftigate 

them  to,  ii.  5. 
How  far  their  legal  power  extends,  ii.  17. 
Such  as  are  barbarous  to  their  own  peo- 
ple, are  ufually  gentle  to  the  enemies 
of  their  country,  ii.  57. 
A  dangerous  thing  to  arm  them  with  too 

much  force,  ii.  105. 
Bound  by  their  oaths  and  promifes,  ii, 

141,  142,  143,  144. 

From  whence  their  power  is  deriv'd,  n« 

236. 
Not  fafe  to  contradift  fome,  tho*  never 

fojuftly,  ii.  361. 
An  unlimited  one  what    compar'd  to, 
and  an  inflanre  of   fuch  an  one  in 
fcripture,  ii.  362. 
Frincipes,  the  extent  of  the  word,  i.  25, 
88,  128.  ii.  98,  243,  255,  259. 
T'he  Sanhedrin  meant  thereby,  i.  418. 
Principle:  of  all    generous  nations   before 
Chrift's  time,  what,  i.  7. 
And  practices  the  beft  way  to  judge  men 
by,  i.  262. 
Prifoners,  ought  to  pay  their  promis'd  ran- 

fom,  ii.  142. 
Private  perfon,  what  aftions  denote  a  ma- 

giftrate  fo,  i.  317,  321. 
Pri-vernites,  their  city  taken  by  Plautius 

the  conful,  ii.  302. 
ProcefSy  judicial  and  legal,  what,  i.  3 1 3. 

Or  extrajudicial,  i.  324. 
Prcclamjtiom,  are  at  mofl  but  temporary, 
ii.  359,  368.  _ 
The  danger  of  their  being  accounted  laws, 
ii.  360,  363,  365. 
Promijeiy  ought  juftly  to  be  performed,  ii, 

142. 
Even  thofe  extorted  by  fraud.     A  fcrip- 

ture-inftance,  ii.  143. 
Property,    is  an  appendage  to  liberty,  il. 

126. 
Of  our  kings,  if  they  be  the  fountain 

of  it,  ii.  263. 
Propojitionsj  ought  to  be  univerfally  true, 

i.  20,  31. 
Filqner's  general  one  found  falfe,  i.  54, 

58$. 


Profcriptiont,    i.   203,    207,    21?,    J23, 

»55»  331- 
Profperity  runs  naturally  into  all  manner  of 

excefles,  i.  218,  261. 
Men  have  been  precipitated  into  ruin  by 

it,  ii.  337. 
Proxies,  the  way  of  ufing  them,  I,  143, 
Proximity  of  b!:od,  only  regarded  in  fome 

places,  whether  legitimate  or  not,  u 

340.  ii.  280. 
How  right  del'cend?  this  way,  ii.  272. 

Vid.  SucceJJion, 
Punlpment  of  fupreme  magiftrates  in  three 

inftances,  i.  316,  317,  319. 
To  exempt  all  perfons  from  it,  fuppofes 

they  would  be  guilty  of  the  worft,  i, 

3*5- 
"Where  there  is  no  fear  of  it,  i.  367, 

368. 
Future,  many  don't  believe  or  not  re- 
gard it,  ii.  10,  75. 
Of  thofe  "^he  prince  corrupted  to  defert 

the  publick  caufe,  ii,  311, 
Of  thofe  that  give  princes  ill  advice,  iJ, 

357,  358. 
Whether  it  ought  to  fall  upon  one  or  a 

few  guilty  perfons,  or  a  whole  natioa 

that  is  innocent,  ii.  341, 
To  what  members  of  parliament  are  fub- 

jea,  ii.  370. 
In  whom  the  power  of  it  is  lodg*d,  ii, 

375- 
Pyrrbus,  feems  equal  to  either  of  the  Alex« 

anders,  i.  304. 

His  anfwcr  to  him  that  ask'd  who  ihoald 

fucceed  him^  i.  333. 


0.° 


Q:. 

Ualitixy    no  more   extraordinary   in 
princes  than  in  others  of  lefs  degree. 


1.  13. 

What  are  requifite  for  chief  maglftrates, 
i.  65,  70,  105. 

Few  kings  poflefs  all  that  are  requifite, 
i.  190. 

What  I'ubfift  in  a  well-order'd  govern- 
ment, i.  203. 

The  moft  eminent  without  virtue,  re- 
puted vile  and  odious,  i.  211. 
parrels  among  princes  for  the  moft  part 
begun   upon  perfonal  titles,    i.   312, 

347,  348,  350- 

Of  princes,  where  they  have  been  de- 
cided with  their  own  fwords,  i.  312, 
341. 

What  would  make  a  perpetual  fpring  of 
irreconcilable  and  mortil  quarrels,  i* 
340. 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


^uafreh,  fuch  as  arife  between  the  Nobles 
and  Commons  frequently  produce  good 
laws,  i.  5sS- 
Ouis  with  the  Dutchj  1.  3S1. 


R. 


RA'zi^ygk,  Sir  Walter,  retle£>ed  on  by 
Filmer,  ii.  274. 
His  morals  no  way  exa£l  to  a  well  qua- 
lified gentleman,  ii.  274. 
Rejfcny  is  man's^  nature,  i.  271.  ii.  29, 

Univerfal,  is  that  to  which  all  nations 

owe  an  equal  venewtion,  ii.  95. 

Rebellion^  the  greateft  empire  of  the  Eaft 

overthrown  by  that  of  the  Mamalukes, 

i.  217. 

People  driven  to  it  by  mifery  or  defpair, 

i.  217.  ii.  24,  25. 
There  can  be  no  luch  as  that  of  a  natk  n 

againft  its  own  magiftrates,  ii.  301. 
What  it  implies,  ii.   301. 
Is  nothing  but  a  renew'd  war,  ii.  302, 

306. 
What  is  compared  to  witchcraft,  ii.  306. 
jRegal  fower,  never  exercis'd  by  Abraham, 
ij.  32. 
The  firfl  fathers  after  the  flood  had  not 
the  exercife  of  it,  i.  441. 
JiegicideSy  their  abominable  tin,  ii.  192. 
Regnum,  the  fignification  of  the  word,  ii, 

5- 
Rehohoam,  a  fad  account  of  him,  J.  192, 

405- 
His  power  far  from  being  abfolute,  ii. 

69,  70. 
Had  goood  counfel,but  would  not  hearken 

to  it,  ii.  129. 
Was  not  the  head  of  his   people,  and 

why,  ii.  330. 
RcUgion,  always  dangerous  in  the  times  of 

the  beft  Roman  emperors,  i.  194. 
Of  the  fame  nature  vnth  virtue,  i.  383. 
The  principles  of  the  popifli,  ii,  365. 
Faucdies  to  government  apply'd  according 

to  the  neceflity  of  circumftances,  i. 

209,  244.  ii.  335,  336,   337. 
What  children  have,    againft  their  too 

fevere  parents,  ii.  9. 
None  to  the  Hebrews  cries  and  prayers 

under  their  mif-ries,  ii.  15. 
Muft  be  try'd,  how  difficult  foever,  ii. 

339»  340. 
Whith  mort  fit  to  be  apply  d,  the  beft 

time   to  apply   them,    -ind   who   the 

propereft  judges,  ii.  346,  347. 
Feprcjentuti<ves ,  hew,  and  by  vhom  they 

came   to  be  deputed,  ii.   245,  246, 

255,  258,  31S. 
Whethar  the  people  fhould  judge  of  their 

behaviour,  ii.  319,  320, 


Republkh^  Vid.  Commonzvealtht. 
Reftgnation  of  one's  liberty,  what,  li.  289, 

Of  the  crown,  ii.   147,   148,   342.. 
Rcfijiance,  in  what  cafes  jnftified,  i.  382, 
ii.  18,  21,  22,  37,  38. 
Every  one  has  a  right  to  refift  what  ought 

not  to  be  done  to  him,  ii.  31,  32, 
Scripture- instances  of  refifting  princes,  ii. 
76. 
Refumption  of  lands,  Vid.  Granti. 
Retaliation^  where  nothing  was  mere  juft, 
i.  191. 
Kings  under  this  law  as  well  as  people, 
ii.  27. 
Rcver.uB,   how  granted  to  and  fettled  on 

kings,  ii.  50. 
Revolts  of  conquer'd  nations,  i.  215. 
Of  fubje£ts  or  allies,  i.  217,  331, 
Of  Ifrael  in  Solomon's  time,  i.    330, 

ii.  25. 
Of  Abfalom,  ii.  22,  24. 
Of  the  ten  tribes,  ii.  25. 
General   of   a  nation  can't  be  call'd  a 
rebellion,  ii.  300,  301. 
Revolu.'ioKS,  Vid.  Authors. 
Rewards  and  puni/hments  how  to  be  pro- 
portion'd,  i.  232. 
Make  men  fubfervient  to  ill  defigns,  ii.' 

48,  49. 
What  call'd  the  rewards  of  the  vileft 
fervitude,  ii.  243. 
Riches,  the  root  of  all  evil,   i.  91,  92, 
364.  366. 
When  they  become  formidable,  1.  209, 
Exhaufted  by  tribute  and  rapine,  i.  219, 

366. 
Defir'd,  to  gain  followers,  i.  48. 
From  thence  all  mifchiefs  enfue,  ii.  51. 
Right,  of  thjfe  foverejgns  that  are  lin>ited, 
i.  318,  320,  321. 
Proceeds  frcm  identity,  not  from  fimili* 

tude,  ii.  328. 
What  belongs  to  every  man  in  all  cafes, 

"•  343- 
Right  acquired,    how  to   be  obtain'd,  i:, 

153,  265. 
How   the  refignation  of   it   to  another 

operates,  ii.  265. 
Hereditary  to  the  dcminicn  of  the  wcujd, 
no  fuch  thing,  i.  76,  77,   121. 
Great  variety  in  the  dedudtion  of  it, 
i.  156. 
Univeifal,  ccnfer'd  by  God  and  nature, 
i.  63. 
Where  it  muft  have  been,  i.  71,  73, 

S4,  134. 
Mul^  be  one,  or  divided,  i.  71,  74. 
Wheie  it  devolves  on  particular  na- 
tions, i.  136. 
Right  of  chufmg,  infers  a  right  of  mak- 
ing a  king,  i.  147. 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

flight,  created  by  an  explicit  a£l  of  appr»-     Rome,  when  {he  met  with  defeats  and  ruin^ 


bation,  i.  148,   162. 
Naturally  belonging  to  nations,  not  im- 
pair'd  bv  the  nanrie  of  fuprenie  given 
to  magiftrates,  i,  ^517. 
Of  proceeding  judicially  or  extrajudicial- 
ly againil  all  that  tranfgrefs  the  laws, 
i,  323.  ii.  18. 
^ight  of  occupancy,  i.  65,  92,  93. 
None  can  come  by  conqueft,  i-  39,  4^0* 
None  to  be  deduc'd  from  him  that  had 

none,  i.  40,  73,  94. 
Where  to  be  acknowledg'd,  J.  66. 
Of   Jack  Straw,  Wat.    Tyler,    Perkin 

Warbeck,  i.  341. 
The  continuance  of   an  unjufl:  ufurpa- 
tion  can  never  create  a  right,  i.  448. 
^:git  of  particular  nations,  how  it  may 
fubfifl,  i.  i6,  17. 
Proceeds  from  the  laws  of  nature,  i,  17. 
ii,  241. 
Jiigbt  to  crowns,   what  faid  to  be  infe- 
parable  from  kings,  i.  172. 
Muft  be  eirhcr  natural,  created,  or  ac- 
quir'd,  ii.  153. 
Meckel,  how  it  came  to  be  taken,  i.  397. 
^ods  and  axes,    before   whom,    and  why 

carried,  i.  258.  ii.  294. 
S.oman  emperors,  who  the  beft  and  wifeft 
of  them,  i.  362. 
How  they  were  fet  up,  ii.  65. 
Momat   empire,    deftroy'd   by   the  lofs  of 
her  liberty,  i.  193,   199,  200,  204, 
205,  221,  222,  223,  229,  246. 


Its  extent  after  the 
i.  202,  221. 


recovery   of  liberty, 


1.  188,  392,  393. 

Ail  that  ever  was  defirable  in  her  pro- 
ceeded from  liberty,  i.  201, 

Never  produc'd  a  brave  man  fince  the 
firlt  age  of  her  flavery,  i.  204. 

How  it  was  compos'd,  i.  234. 

Sought  her  grandeur  by  war,  i,  240, 
288. 

Her  fortune  when  (he  became  a  monar- 
chy, i.  242. 

None  fo  free  from  crimes  of  wilful  in- 
juftice,  nor  guilty  of  fo  few  errors  as 
fhe,  i.  252. 

Her  generofity,  i.  252. 

The  mildnefs  of  her  government  for  300 
years,  i.  254,  259,  260. 

Struggling  for  liberty,  at  laft  was  ruin'd 
by  the  Barbarians,  i.  256,  257. 

Not  endav'd  when  Brutus  was  kiJl'd,  i, 
301. 

Was  jealous  of  Valerius  Publicola,  and 
why,  i.  309. 

The  peace  Ihe  had  under  Auguftus,  i. 

^  ^  T 

^^ 

When  fill'd  with  blood  and  aflies,  i.  333. 
Her  condition  now,  i.  374,  375. 
Suffer'd  more  by  one  villain,  than  by  all 
the  defeats  receiv'd  from  Hannibal, 

i-  377- 
A  perpetual  fpring  of  brave  and  valiant 

men  fo  long  as  liberty  lafted,  i.  394. 
Remain'd  in  llavery  notwithftanding  the 

flaughter  of  Caefar,  i.  36. 
Her  kings  lands,  after   their  expulfion, 

confecrated  to  Mars,  i.  49. 


Tacitus'e  defcription  of  it  in  Its  deden-     Romulus^  flain  for  aiming  at  too  great  an 


fion,  I.   204,  207. 
Jt  d  d  not  fall  on  a  ludden,  and  why,  i. 

205. 
Her  delatores  what  fort  of  people,  i.  204. 
Subdu'd   by  the  moft  barbarous  nations, 

i.  208,  224,  257. 
Perpetually  decay'd  when  it  fell  into  the 

handsof  oneman,  i.  219,  222,  224, 

ii.  44. 
Its  own  prudence  preferv'd  it,  i.  229, 

245- 
Reftians  hsd  three  ways  of  dealing  with  ccn- 
quer'd  nations,  i.  216. 

What  r^is'd  them  above  the  reft  of  man- 
kind, i.  282,  285. 

They  only  ft:  to  be  (0,  who  thought  no- 
thing valuable  but  liberty,  ii.  302. 
Rome,  whether  that  government  was   pa- 
ternal, i.  64. 

Overthrew   all    the    monarchies   within 
thrir  reach,   i,  64,   202,   228. 

Its  extfint  at  firft,  i.  laS,  22p, 

Whereivi  (he  excePd  otner  nations,   U 

Z86,   221,   222, 


authority,  i.  62. 
How  not  made  king  by  the  people  but 

by  God,  i.  94.  ii.  209. 
Laid  the  right  of  appeals  to  the  people,  as 

the  foundation  of  his  commonwealth, 

i.  212. 
How  he  tf  mpsr'd  the  fierce  humour  of 

the  people,  ii.  217. 
Ru/e,  there  mult  be  one  relating  to  the  ac- 

quilition  and  exercife  of  power,  i.  411. 

ii.  278. 
The  law  of  nature  is  that  which  God 

has  given  to  things,  ii.  29. 
If  ^ny  h.^.d  bpen  given   by   God   and  na. 

tu;e,  it  muft  have  been  from  the  be- 
ginning  univerfai   and   perpetual,    ii, 

212. 
There  is  one  which  kings  are  oblig'd  to 

follow,  ii.  278,  279. 
None  can  be  fo  exacl  as  to  make   pro- 

vifion   againft   all  dilputes,    ii.    307, 

3-8. 
Without  it  fociety  cannot  fubfift,  Ii.  344. 
Men  fubjeft  to  none-  but  that  of  their 

own  reafon,  ii,  277. 

Hulet, 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

^aJ«,  fet  to  alftlneuifh  between  right  and  Saul^  not  made  king  by  virtue  of  God's 

wrong  in  princes,  i.  66.  unftion  only,  ii.  21. 

By  which  men  are  govern'd,  arc  nam'd  Savoy ^  the  duke,  found  out  thirteen  halves 

laws,  i,  104.  to  be  in  every  year,  ii.  305. 

Not  generally  true,  if  there  be  any  juft  Saxors,  fet  up  kings  and  deposed  them  as 


exceptions  againft  them,  1.  140. 
In  politicks,  fome  which  ought  always 

to  be  obferv'd,  i.  245,  271. 
Obferv'd  in  England  as  fo  point  of  fuc« 

ceffion,  1.  340,  341, 


S. 


SAbtaniy  their  kings,  tho*  obeyM  In  all 
things  within  their  palace,  yet  might 
be  fton'd  without  it,  i.  158. 
Sacredy  not  to  be  accounted  fo  by  crimes, 

i.  3^3.  324- 
The  ftiie  given  to  the  tribunes  as  well 
as  monarchs,  ii.  294. 
Salick  law  in  France,  i.  81,    339,   340, 
424.  Ii.  149,   155, 
Has  been  in  force  above  1200  years,  1, 

424. 
Not  without  difficulties  fufficient  to  fub- 
vert  the  polity  of  that  kingdom,     In- 
ftances  thereof,  ii.  167,   168. 
Saltnafiui  his  ftory  of  bees,   i.  168. 
Sahis  Pjpuli,  Lex  eft  fuprema,  i.  160.  II. 
5,  6,  58, 127,  155, 157,  220,  229. 
To  what  this  fafety  extends,  ii.  127. 


they  pleas'd,  ii.  87,  247,  248. 

The  brave  faying  of  king  Ofta,  ii.  145, 
478,  292. 

Laws  to  which  all  our  kings  have  fworn 
continue  ftill  in  force  among  us,  ii. 
146. 

Severe  aflertors  of  their  liberties  and 
laws,  ii.  210,  242,  265. 

We  chiefly  derive  our  original  and  man- 
ners from  them,  ii.  242,  291, 

Their  aflemblies  the  fame  in  power  with 
our  parliaments,  ii.  245,  246. 

In  their  own  country  fcorn'd  all  employ- 
ments but  that  of  the  fword,  ii.  260. 

By  what  names  they  and  their  general 
aflemblies  were  call'd,  ii.  260. 

Came  hither  under  Hengift  and  Horfa, 
ii.  263. 

How  they  came  to  reform  their  man- 
ners, and  frame  laws,  ii.  292. 

Their  great  wifdom  in  making  laws,  ii. 

378,  379-  . 
Scloolmenj  an  unjuft  imputation  on  them, 
i.  5,  7,  20,  102. 
To  what  a  nicety  they  have  minc'd  oathsj 
ii.  137. 


The  end  for  which  governments  are  in-     Scientes  temporum,  who,  i.  391. 


ftituted,  H.  131. 
Samuel  was  no  king,  for  the  Ifraeiites  ask'd 
one  of  him,  ii.  8. 

What  he  wrote  in  a  book  was  not  a  law 
to  the  people  but  to  the  king,  Ii.  8. 

Told  them  their  folly  and  mifery  in  ask- 
ing a  king,  ii.  15,  27. 

Not  hf,  but  God  was  reje£led  by  them, 
I.  180.  ii.  54. 

How  he  behaved  himfelf  as  head  of  the 
Ifraeiites,  ii,  330. 


Scipio   Africanui,  the  firft  that  difdaln'd, 

the  power  of  the  law,  i.  253, 
Scotland,  the  mifchiefs  brought  upon  it  by 

their  contefts,  i.  354. 
When  and  how  conquer'd,  i.  399. 
Their  little  number  of   foot   beat  the 

king's  army  at  Newborn,  i.  401,  402. 
James  the  third,  Lewis  XI's  apt  fcholar 

in  fubverting  the  laws,  &c.  i.  422. 
Many  of  their  king?  punifh'd  with  death, 

imprifonment  and  exile,  ii.  341,  347, 


5'fl;;W/';»  inftiuted  by  Mofes,  I.  175,  233.     Scripture^  the  places  therein  relating  to  go- 


How  permanent,  i.  177. 

Always  to  be  advifers  of  the  Jewifli  kings, 

i.  417.  ii.  84. 
Where  faid  that  kings  can  do  nothing 

without  them,  ii.  25,  26. 
For  what  end  conftituted  judges,  ii.  26, 
Sauly  his  firft  fin  by  which  he  fell,  i.  171, 

177. 
Oppofing  God's  command   he  pretended 

to  fulfil  it,  i.  192. 
The  effects  of  his  various  fits  of  fury,  i, 

191,  192.  ii.  57. 
His  vices  never  difcover'd,  till  be  was 

on  the  throne,  i.  370. 
Gave  the  Ifraeiites  no  law,  ii.  8. 
Chofen  king  in   the  moft  democratical 

way,  by  lot,  ii.  12,   18. 
IIcxv  he  overthrew  his  own  right,  ii.  20, 


vernment,  how  beft  interpreted,  i.  26. 
What  it  fays  concerning  kings,  i.   26, 

172,  ii,  47. 
The  accounts  there  given  concerning  their 

leaders,  i.   172,   173. 
What  it  occafionally  relates  of  the  Ba- 
bylonian and  other  monarchies,  i.  334. 
Declares   the  neceflity  of  fetting  bounds 

to  princes,  i.  417. 
Is  clear  concerning  the  antiquity  of  laws, 

ii.  7.  _ 
Senate f  their  power,  I,  24,  210. 
Julius  Caefar  flain  in  it,  i.    193. 
Set  up  by  the  people,  i.  220. 
How  expos'd  and  deftroy'd,  i.  223. 
Condemn'd  Nero  to  be  put  to  death,  i« 

258. 
Kill'd  Romulus,  i,  287, 

Ssttatej 


An  Alphabctica]  TABLE. 

Senate,  flrangcrs  admittedinto  that  of  Rome,  Slaves,  what  tributes  they  are  forc'd  to  pay " 


1.  288. 
Abrogated  the  power  of  the  Decemviri, 

i.  316. 
The  beft  judges,  5.  321,  322. 
And  people  of  Rome  not  to  be  brib'd, 

i.  368,  371. 
Of  Rome  like  to  be  butcher'd,  and  for 

what,  i.  332. 
Chofen  for  their  virtues,  i.  373. 
Of  what  conftltuent  parts  it  may   be 

compos'd,  i.  433. 
The  greateft  part  of  them  fell  at  the 

battle  of  Pharfalia,  ii.  205. 
Of  Sparta  and  Venice  their  great  power, 

ii.  239. 
Senators  and  fervants  employ'd  m  oor 

pubhck  affairs,  ii.  369, 
Sedimn,  popular,  i.  15. 
What,  i.  313. 
"What  it  implies,  i.  142,  325 


II.  71. 
What  denotes  a  flave,   ii.  126,    184, 

185. 
What  the  true  badges  of  flaves,  ii.  175, 

176. 
Sad,  when  the  worft  of  them  came  to 

govern  kings,  ii.  38S. 
Slavery,  what  to  be  underftood  by  it,  i« 

i7>  38,  39>  49- 
What  it  is  accompany'd  with,  i.  186, 

187,  248. 
The  produce  of  it,  i.  227,  228,  279, 
The   Afiaticks  underwent  the  greateH, 

ii.  16. 
A  great  part  of  the  curfc  againft  Cham 

and  all  his  poftcrity,  ii.  26. 
None  of  God's  inftitution,  ii.  28. 
What  brings  it  upon  any  nation,  together 

with  its  ruin,  ii.  349. 
,  With  a  witnefs,  ii.  367. 


Said  to  be  occafion'd  by  learning,  i.  184,    i'/o/i)  in  princes,  the  miferable  effefts  thcre- 

197,  249.  of,  i.  346. 

None  hurtful  to  Rome  till  men  got  above    Smyrna,  the  defign  of  taking  that  fleet,  u 


the  law,  i.  214,  215.  ^ 
From  whence  it  arifes,  i.  309,   311, 

335' 
Proceeding  from  malice,    is  feidom  or 

never  feen  in  popular  governments,  i, 

3"* 

But  always  deteftable,  1.  326, 

One  of  the  greateft  that  ever  was  at 
Rome  appeas'd,  and  how,  i,  332. 

When  juftify'd  by  God  and  man,  i.  3 14, 
317,  319,  326. 


Societies,  muft  in  fome  meafure  dimlnifii 
liberty,  i.  37,  38,  44,  103,  104. 

Subfift  only  by  order,  i.  iiz,  133,  134, 
ii.  344. 

Civil,  compos*d  of  equals,  i.  118. 

How  inftituted,  i.  130,  141,  142/ 

When  once  eoter'd  into,  oblige  all  to  the 
laws  thereof,  i.  141. 

Are  maintain'd  by  mutual  contracts,  i* 

-----  ...  4^7- 

Moft  natural  to  abfolute  monarchies,  ii,     Socrates  put  to  death  by  falfe  witnelTcs,  i. 

326,  327.  251. 

From  Solomon's  time  the  Jews  perpe-    Soil,  kings  not  originally  lords  of  it,  ii» 


tually  vex'd  with  them,  i.  327. 
To  what  fome  magiftrates  give  this  name, 
ii.  173. 
Seneff,  the  battle  of  it,  i.  401, 
Servants  of  God,  who,  i.  96. 

Rais'd  to  high  de^ees  of  honour,  i.  lio, 

III. 
None  can  be  members  of  a  common- 
wealth, i.  I20,  140. 
Ship-money,  Vid.  Judges. 
Sbircs,  far  more  antient  than  Alfred's  time, 
and  what  meant  by  them,  ii.  256, 

Singulis  major ^  univerCs  minor,  i.  319,  ii, 

74.  75- 
Slave:  by  nalure,  who,  i.  7,  17,  56,  ill, 

160.  ii.  37. 

Oftentimes  advanced,  i.  ill,  204,  206, 

148,  261.  ii.  123 


262,  263,  290. 
Soldiers  in  fcripture,  there  were  as  many  to 
fight  for  their  country,  as  there  were 
able  men  to  fight,  i.  291. 
Every  man  is  one  againft  a  pubilck  enemy. 

The  Grecian  m  the  time  of  their  vir- 
tue bad  no  equals,  i.  394. 

The  Chriftlan  their  obligation,  ii.  iSx, 
Soldiers  mercenary,  overthrow  &11  the  laws 
of  a  country,  i.  265,  428. 

Often  betray  their  matters  in  diftrefs,  i. 
280,  283. 

Several  cities  in  Italy  made  their  wars  by 
them,  i.  288. 

Always  want  fidelity  or  courage,  i.  29s* 

Sent  to  the  wars  by  force,  i.  400, 
►,  And  other  viJlans  fubdu'd  the  Syracufaps, 
Spartans  and  Romans, 


!-445. 
No  members  of  the  civil  fociety,  i.  216.    Soldiery,  accounted  a  trade,  i.  214. 

Abfolutely  refign  themfelves  to  the  will    Solomon,  his  idolatry  and  oppreflion,  1,  192, 
of  others,  and  why,  i.  274,  275.  The  bad  effeft  of  his   magnificence,  U 

What  ftates  become  (o  to  their  prote^or,  330. 

i.  298.  His  peaceable  reign,  i.  330. 

Stiomoag 


An  Alphabetical-  TABLE. 

Sitomtny  ovetthrew  the  law  given  by  Mofes,    Sbartans,  the  poverty  and  fimpllcity  of  therf 
ii.  2t.  king?,   ii.  49. 

Their  legiHature  was  in  the  people,  fi. 
85. 
Stability^  the  effe£t  of  good  order  in  that 
which  is  good,  i.  65,   189,   190. 
V/herein  it  confifts  in  man,  i.  189, 
There  can  be  none  in  abfolute  kingdoms^ 

j«  i95>  33^  35i>  353' 
Produces  ftiength,  i.  197, 

Not  wanting  in  Venice,  i.  locy. 

Nor  among  the  Romans,  i.  203. 

Star-chambery  its  jurifdi<^ion  aboliHi'd,  ii, 

237- 
StcTteS'getie'-al,  Vid.  Ho/land, 

Statutes,   from   whom    they  receive   their 
authority  and  force,  ii.  3^9, 
Vid.  ^cii  of  farliament. 
Stipulations  are  not  perfonal  but  national, 

ii.  352. 
Suarez,  his  faying  about  Adam,  i.  119, 
Spain,  ii.  157.  SubjeBion  Ixnsil^  never  antiently  dreamt  of, 

3.  116, 
To  the  power,  however  acquired,  i.  314, 
And  proteft'on  axe  relatives,  ii.  290. 


None  will  fay  he  wa^  a  t}-rant,  yet  he 
was  complain'd  of  by  the  people,  ii. 

54' 
His    wifdcm    furpafs'd    that  of  all  the 

people,  ii.  322. 

Sovereignty    impatiently  bear  competitors, 

Majelty,  the  extravagance  of  it  in  Au- 
guftus  Caefar's  time,  ii.  io6. 
Sovereignty y  remained  in  the  Roman  people, 
i.  211. 

To  whom  the  difpofal  of  it  mud  perpe- 
tually belong,  ii.  277,  279. 
Spainy  has   nothing  fave  Milan,  but  what 
is  come  to  her  by  marriage,  i.  307. 

The  civil  wars  there,  i.  353,  3*4- 

The  antient  kingdoms  of  Spain  heredi- 
tary, i.  15?.  ii.  149. 

When  one  kingdom    comprehended  all 


How  the  crown  was  d?.rpos*d  of  accord- 
ing to  the  humour  of  the  people,  ii. 

157,  158,  i<;9.         •   n,  ,-         ,  .  .         ,-- 

The  only  title  Kabel  had  to  the  crown,    SubfniJJlony  all  manner  of  it  is  a  reftraint  of 
was  deriv'd  from  illegitimation,    ii. 


167.      _ 
How  the  king  may  deferve  the  name  of 
being  head  of  his  people,  ii.  333. 
Spaniards,    their  valour  againft  the   Car- 
thaginians   and    Remans,    and   their 
overthrow  by  two  lev/d  tyranif,  i.  30&. 
The  condition  to  which  they   have  re- 
duc'd  Naples,  Sicily,  the  Weil-Indies, 
&c.  i.  376,  377. 
Spartan  kings,  what  they  were  fub]e£l  to 
from  their  people,  i.  154,  156,  157. 
Together  with  their  power,  i.  420. 
Government  in  v/hat  it  confifted,  i.  233. 
Prefer'd  by  Xenophon  to  Athens,  i, 

249,  250. 
Fram'd  a  moftfevere  difcipllne,  i.  288. 
Never  any  fedition  againft  their  kings, 

i.  420. 
Call'd  an  ariftccracy  by  all  the  Greek 

authors,  i.  432,  433. 
Appointed  limits  to  the  power  of  their 

kings,  i.  436.  ii.  309,  335. 
Had  no  law  agaiWt  adultery,  and  why, 
ii.  4. 
Spartans y  whom  they  brought  from  Thebes 
and  Epirus  to  be  their  kings,  i.  61. 
Jealous  of  Lycurgus,  and  why,  i.  309. 
Had  kin^  before  the  times  ot  Hercules 

and  Achilles,  i.  156. 
Sacrific'd  their  lives  in  defence  of  their 

country,  i.  285. 
Never  heard  an  enemy's  trumpet  for  880 

years,  i.  289. 
Whether  defcended  from  the  Hebrews, 
and  what  power  the  coUedive  body 
of  the  people  had  over  thetp,  i.  ^ZQ, 


liberty,  1.  271. 

The  nature  and  meafure  of  it  how  to  be 
dctermin'd,  ii.  J44. 
Succejfiony  no  difference  in  religion  faid  to 
be  able  to  divert  the  right  of  it,  i.  42, 

The  eldeft  brother  prefer'd  before  the 
fon,  i.  irS. 

To  the  next  in  blood,  1,  189. 

Of  blood,  the  difeafe  incident  to  it,  Is 
300, 
Laws  concerning  it,  i.  337.  ii.  loS. 

Bv  the  law  of  God  and  nature,  i.  338. 

The  various  ways  of  it  in  feveral  king- 
doms, i.  339,  34a  _ 

The  flaughters  about  it  in  France,    i. 

344>  34 5- 
Sometimes  comes  to  rhoftfters  in  cruelty, 

to  children  and  fools,  ii,    104,   105. 
The  law  gives  the  rule  of  it,  ii,   iizy 

149,  150,  156. 
Five  different  ways  of  difpofing  of  it,  ii* 

149,  150,  279,  280. 
In  Sp  in  according  to  the  pleafure  of  the 

nobility  snd  people,  ii.  157,  158. 
Where  in  France   'tis  like  to  be  quefti- 

on'd,  if  not  overthrown  by  the  houfe 

of  Auftris,  ii.  163. 


CoBtefts   will  arife 


concerning 


rt,  how 


tXiCiXy  foever  it  be  difpos'd  of  by  law,- 

ii.  270. 
No  footfteps  of  any  regular  one,  either 

by  isheritance  or  ele£lion,  ii.  210. 
Of  the  crown  fettled  by  parliament,  ii, 

238. 
Several  que^ions  arifing  from  that  which 

is  hereditary,  ii,  ^70. 

)ttperiority3i 


Sp 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Superlcrify,  given  to  Mofes,  who  was  the 
younger  brother,  i.  46. 
Not  in  nature,  but  in  virtue,  i.   105, 

IXZ u: 

Sufplicaticns  and  remonnrances,  where   to 

be  us'd,  ii.  340. 
Supreme,  the  extent  of  the  word,  i.  317, 

313,  321,  451,  452>  453-  "•  129, 

190,  236. 
power  has  been  enjoy'd  in  the  fullsfl  ejf- 

tent  by  fuch  as  never  had  the  name  of 

king,  ii.  98. 
Where  there  was  a   refervation  of  this 

power  in  the  people,  ii.  114. 
Siv'.'ieriy  the  blood- royal  not  to  marry  out 

of  the  country,  or  wiihcat  confent  cf 

the  rtates,  i.  340. 
How  the  inheritance    to    the   crown  is 

fettled  there,  ii.  150,  277. 
Eleaicn  the  beft  title  to  it,  il.   153, 

255- 
Their  laws  but  few,  JI.  zzz. 

Who  the  nobility  of  that  country,  u. 

What  Charles  Guftavus  told  an  ambafik- 

thcre,  ii.  277. 
Sivitzcrs,  the  1 3  Cantons,  how  long  they 

have    enjoy'd  more    peace   than  any 

other  ftate  of  Europe,  i.  295,  296. 
None  more  free  from  popular  feditions, 

i.  296. 
The  laws  of  their  country  read  over  in  a 

few  hours,  ii.  222. 
How  they  ufe  their  delegates,  ii,  369, 

370- --.     :•■: 
SiuorJ,  where  left  as  an  inheritance  to  fa- 
milies, i.  193. 
The  right  of  appeals  overthrown  by  it, 

i.  212. 
He  that  draws  it  againft  his  prince,  ought 

to  throw  awjy  the  fcabbard,  i.  311. 
Of  juHite,  and  of  war,  i.  313.  ii.  66, 

67. 
When  the  only  law  that  governs,  i.  333, 

378. 
A  way  of  killing  worfe  than  that  of  the 

fwcrd,  i.  375. 
To  what  end  fwotds  were  given  to  men. 

The  ufe  of  the  civil  as  well  as  rr.Ilitary, 

equally  condemn'd  by   the  firft  Chri- 

ftians,  ii.  66,   67. 
Of  power,  in  all  forts  of  governments, 

ii.  78,  79. 
So    to    be   us'd    that  nations  noay  live 

peaceably,  ii.  84. 
What  me<»nt  by  this  word,  il.  84,  85. 
Of  juftice  comprehendo   the   le^iHative 

and  executive  power,  ii,  S5. 
What  the  military   fignifies,  ii.  85,  86. 
Qaeftions    about   title    to    crowns  often 

JeteiUiin'd  this  wayj  ii.  167, 


Stoord,  where  edi£ts  are  hefitated  at  by  the 

parliament  at  Paris,    this  povi-er  ha» 

iaeen  made  ufe  of  to  compel,  ii.  384, 

.Ty/Za,  the  crimes  ox  hi»  life,  and  mii'eiies 

cf  his  death,  i.  360,  361. 

If  not  a  typant,  there  never  was  any  in 

the  world,  i.  378. 
Refigns    hi^   power,    tho'   too   la^p  for 
Rome's  recovery,  i.  37S. 


T. 


TAcUuiy  his  fad  account  of  Rome,  5. 
ICO,  204,  207,  277,    255,  479. 
Speaks  of  the  burden  of  abfolute  power, 

J.  123. 
Mentions  a  fort  of  kings  us*d  by  the 
Romans  to  keep  nations  in  fervitude 
to  them,  i.  210. 
W'hen  he  fays  the  Roman  laws  grew  in- 
nunr.ej-able,  i.  222. 
Tamerlane  faiJ  he  was  not  a  man,  but  the 
fcoi;rge  of  God,    and  the  plague  of 
mankind,  ii.  132. 
Tar^uin,  the  expulfion  of  him  from  Rome, 
i.  20,  ii.  209. 
The  fixft  that  reign'd  fine  jufiii  populi, 

i.  137-, 
Came  in  it  by  treachery  and  murder,  i, 

201,  220,  246,  321. 
How    the    people  deliver'd    themfelves 

from  him,  i.  236,  273,  274,  358, 

359- 
What  follow'd  from  his  being  cxpel'd, 

i.  310.  ii.  36. 

His  counfel  concerning  the  poppies,  i, 

34»- 
Taxes,  upon  what  accounts  to  be  given, 
but  not  to  opprefs  the  people,  ii.  50, 
TenantSy    how  they  now  look  upon  their 

lords,  ii.  312,  313. 
Tenure,  none  in  England  owes  any  hut  by 
virtue  of  a  contradV,  made  either  by 
himfelf  or  his  predeceflbrs,  ii.  41. 
Thofe  of  turpitude  now  abolifli'd,   ii, 

42. 
Of  the  commons  as  antient  as  many  cf 
the  nobilities,  iit  251. 
Tertulliatiy  fevcral  fa'jings  cut  of  his  apo» 
logeticks.  ii.  66,  67. 
The  defign  of  his  apology  and  treatife  to 
Scapula,  ii.  67,  68. 
Calls  the  whole  people  of  CartVage,  an- 
tiquitate  noblles,  nobilitate  felices,  ii« 
261. 
Thaneftry,  the  law  of  it,  i.  158, 
Tkemijioclesy  his  charadler,  i.  250. 

His  envy  and  {"-.Jte  to  Ariftides,  i.  250. 
All  the  citizens  of  Athens  able  to  bear 
arms  went  along   with    him  againd 
Xerxes,  i.  2S5. 
A  great  and  true  faying  of  his,  i.  -562. 

TihsriuSf 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


ihcr'iuif  his  reign  an  uninteirupted  feries 
of   murders,    fu born j runs,    perjuries, 
&c.  \    331,   332,  343. 
Aflum'd  the  name  cf  C^lar  without  any 

title,  li.  62. 
His  deteftafile  luil  <Jefciib'd  by  Tacitus, 

ii.  98,  99. 
To  what  counfellors  he  only  inclin'd, 
ii.  130. 
T/we,  changes  nothing,  \.  308,  394. 
Car   inske  nothing  lawful  and  juft  that 
is  not  fo  of  itfeli,  ii.  241. 
7ithif  of  the  firft  kings   came  not  from 
paternity,  i.-    54,  442,  443. 
Of  princes,  deriv'd  from  murders,  ^c, 
i.  65,  69. 
Some  would  not  have  them  examin'd 

into,  i.  66,  314- 
Hobbes  of  another  opinion,  i.  315. 
Inftances  of  ours  in  particular,  ii.  272^ 

273' 
Of  civility  have  no  power  to  create  a 

right  of  dominion,  i.  128, 
Difputes  about  them  by  what  power  to  be 

determin'd,  i.  160,   161.  ii.  169. 
Thought  good  if  the  princes  could  cor- 
rupt two  or  three  legions,  i.  333. 
No  emperor  had  a  better  than  what  he 

got  by  money  or  violence,  i.  333. 
To  dominion  by  whom  confer'd,  i.  442, 
The  fordid  ways  of  attaining  them  in 

our  days,  ii.  251. 
On  whom  thofe  of  offices  were  antlently 

confer'd,  ii.  251. 
In  what  jufl  ones  do  confift,  ii.  269. 
Several  ways  to  overthrow  mod  of  them, 

ii.  271,  272. 
Kings,  where  inftanc'd  in  to  have  no 

other  than  what  was  confer'd  on  them 

by  the  people,  ii.  277. 
Whatever  is  given  to  the  chief  magi- 

ilrate,  he  can  have  no  other  power 

than  what  is  given  him  by  the  people 

and  the  laws,  ii.  285. 
The  moft  fweiling  and  auguft,  to  whom 

given,  ii.  294,  312. 
^mde,  fubfervient  to  the  end  of  war,  i. 

288,  290. 
Spartans  banifh'd  all  the  curious  arts  that 

are  ufeful  to  it,  i.  288,  289. 
Wrajati,   his  expedition  into  the  Eaft,  i, 

221. 

Bitterly  derided  for  his  clemency  by  Ter- 

tuUian,  and  why,  ii.  92. 
Whom  he  bid  to  ufe  the  fword  for  or 

againft  him,  as  he  reign'd  well  or  ill, 

ii.  281,  375. 
^'reajittj  the  puincipal  part  of  Trefilian's, 

was  his  opinion  that  kings  might  dif- 

folve  parliaments  at  their  cleafure,  ii, 

317. 


Treajcn,  perfons   executed   as   traitors  for 
things  done  by  the  king's  command, 

"•  357- 
'Tis  enaded,  thst  to  kill  the  king  is  fo, 
and  to  be  puHifh'd  with  death,  ii.  382. 
Treati'S,  the  king's  name  always  us'd  in 
them,  tho'  they  are  children,  or  other- 
wile  incapable,  but  yet  they  oblige 
them,  their  fuccefTors  and  people,  ii* 

354- 
If  parliaments  Ihould  make  ignominious 

ones,  when  the  feflion  is  ended,  they 

muft   bear    the   burden   as  much  as 

others,  ii.  379. 
^Tribes,  the  ten,  why  they  did  not  return  to 

the  houfe  of  David,  ii.  24. 
Tribunes  of  the  people,  their  creation,  i. 

240,  358. 
Military,  with  a  confular  power,  i.  240, 

245- 
How  Caefar  corrupted  them,  i.  241,  264. 
The  moft  dangerous  fedltion  compos'd  by 

them,  i.  310. 
Threaten  the  didator  with  a  great  fine, 

i.  452. 
Efteem'd  facred  and  inviolable,  il.  294. 
Tribute,  the  ancient  Jews  fcrupled  paying 

it  to  the  emperors,  ii.  62. 
What  underftood  by  that  name,  ii.  62, 

64. 
We  owe  none  but  what  we  freely  give, 

ii.  71. 
Triumvirate,  firft  fet  up  byPompey,  i,  378. 
TruJ},  what  the  greateft  that  can  be  repos'd 

in  men,  ii.  238. 
Where  that  repos'd  in  kings  has  been 

mifemploy'd,  ii.  258. 
How  kings  are  faid  to  difpenfe  with  it 

out  of  the  publick  flock,  ii,  318. 

Vid.  Ki,igs. 
Truth y  no  confequence  can  deftroy  it,  I.  9. 
Is  comprehended  by  examining  prineiples, 

i.  12.  ii.  207. 
Is  the  rule  of  juftice,  i.  57. 
Our  thoughts  ought  ever  to  be  guided 

by  it,  i.  58,  116. 
The  knowledge  of  it  makes  men  wife, 

i.  116. 
Can  never  be  repugnant  to  Juftica,  i.  120. 
What  are  real   truths  grounded  on  the 

laws  of  God  and  nature,  i,  153. 
Kings  feldom  hear  it,  till  they  are  ruin'd 

by  lies,  i.  406. 
Can  never  be  made  too  evident  in  mat- 
ters of  importance,  ii.  156. 
Of  abfolute  neceflity  to  keep  the  tongue 

from  falfhood,  ii.  170. 
The  bond  of  union,  ii.  174. 
They  that  enquire  for  it,  muft  not  deny 

or  conceal  any  thing,  ii.  266. 
Can  feidcm  or  ever  conduce  to  mifchief, 

ii.  32J. 

TrjaU 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


\ 


9ryalf  Vl^.  Law, 

Once  acquitted,  not  queftion'd  a  fecond 

time  for  the  fame  fad,  i.  4^6. 
In  France  the  king  can't  be  prefent  at 

any,  for  no  man  can  be  judg'd  if  he 

be,  ii.  351. 
Here  is  faid  to  be  coram  rege,  but  it 

muft  only  be  according  to  the  Jaw  of 

the  land,  ii.  354. 
*Xumulti,  where  they  do  no  hurt,  i.  iS7i 
From  whence  they  arife,  i.  309. 
What,  i.  314. 

Among  the  Hebrews,  i.  329,  330. 
Of  Rome,  their  difference  from  fome 

of  our  battles,  i.  359. 
What  reigns  are  moft  accompanyM  with 

them,  i.  347»  373-  ,,      ^ 

^urh^  all  the  royal  brethren  expos  d  to  be 
deftroy'd  by  the  Sultan,  i.  12.7.    . 
Their  greateft  flrength  confifts  in  chil- 
dren that  do  not  know  their  own  fa- 
thers, i.  279. 
How  they  came  by  their  ruin,  i.  377. 
When  the   Germans  fled  to  them  for 
protefticn,  ii.  324. 
Tujcarty^  when  one  of  the  moft  flourifhing 
provinces  in  the  world,  now  to  how 
low  an  ebb  reduc'd,  ii.  304. 
*Tyrannyy  how  it  may  be  weaken'd,  i,  10, 
186,  187. 
Abhorr'd  by  the  laws  of  God  and  man, 

i.  69,  360,  361,  417. 
Brought  ruin  to  thofe  fubjefted  thereto, 

i.  104. 
To  impofe  laws  arbitrarily,  5.  151,  152. 
Can  create  no  right,  i.  156. 
Is  enipire  gain'd  by  violence,  i.  157. 
The  occafion  of  revolts,  i.  ai8. 
All  had  their  beginning  from  corruption, 

i.  26*,  327. 
Introduced  by  the  worft  of  men,  i.  273. 

ii.  48. 
The  overthrow  of  Spain,  i.  306. 
The  people  miferable  under  all,  i,  319, 

379,  380. 
Never  founded  on  contra«f!?,  ii.  14. 
When  it  began  to  become  odious,  U.  55, 

56. 

Where  it  is  very  cruel,  a  nation  can't 
fubfift,  unlefs  it  be  corrected  or  fup- 
prefs'd,  ii.  116. 
To  fet  it  up,  is  to  abollfli  kings,  ii.  134, 
Is  the  death  of  a  ftate,  ii,  340, 
Not  the   tyrant,  but  tyranny   muft  be 

defiroy'd,  ii.  349. 
Tyranny  with  a  mil'chief,  ii.  367. 
Tyrants,  how  they  have  been  accounted, 

i.  15*  54>   100.   i*^!*  248. 
The  firrt  king  a  cruel  one,  and  cali'd 

the  mighty  hunter,  i.  31,   190. 
Confult  only  their  own  gr-atncfs,  i.  69, 

X22,   24t,  447. 


TyrantSf  ctedience  faid  to  be  clue  to  thesci 

from  the  fifth  commandment,  i.  loo. 
The  difference  between  lawful  kings  and 

them,  1.  122,  410. 
Few  go  to  their  graves  in  peace,-  i.  1233 

360,  361,  430.  ii.  36,   105. 
Many  would  refift  but  cannot,  i.  147, 
Deftroy*d  by  one  another,  i.  193,   194 j, 

3^7>  348>  .349-  "-"6.  132,  133. 
When  they  reign,  the  virtuous  are  u.i» 

regarded,  j.  201,  202. 
Fear  and  abhor  all  men  of  reputation  or 

virtue,  i.  223,  321,  347,  380. 
All  evils  come  in  with  them,  i.  226. 
Deftroy'd  by  their  own  people,  i.  235, 

447. 
The  thirty  of  Athens,  i.  251,  315, 

Said  exuiflc  hominem,  i.  273,  319. 
Confider  nations  as  graders  do  their  herds^ 

A  virtuous  man  could  fcarce  die  in  his 

bed  under  them,  i.  256. 
Among  the  moft  virtuous  nations  every 

man  might  lawfully  kill  them,  i.  315, 

410,  447.."'  IJ3- 
Tyfanni  fine  titulo,  i.  315.  ii.  299, 

Extrajudicial  proceedings  muft  be  ibme-* 

times  againft  them,  i.  324. 

What  may  be  expefled  from  them,  I9 

3^5- 
None  fuch  upon  Filmer's  principles,  I, 

410.  ii.  125,  126,   129,  131,   133- 
To  what  exceffes  of  cruelty  their  fear 

drives  them,  i.  412. 
Whom  Ariftotle  accounts  fuch,  i.  417* 
Who  faid  to  have  laid  the  foundations  of 

tyranny,  i.  420. 
Do  many  mifchiefs,  and  fuffer  more,  i, 

43o>.437-. 
Their  life  miferable,    death  infamouis, 

and  memory  deteftable,  i.  439. 
"Whether  the  whole  courfe  of  their  aftlons 

do  well  f^it  with  the  facred  name  of 

father,  ii.  2,-3,  4,  5,   132. 
Some  in  removing  them  have  cut  ty* 

ranny  by  the  roots,  ii.  36. 
No  name  tor  one  in  any  of  the  oriental 


tongues,  11.  53, 
He's  no  more  than  an  evil  or  corruptei 

monarch,  ii.  54,  117. 
No  obediencedue  to  any  of  them,  ii.  jco» 
When  kings  are  faid  to  degenerate  into 

fuch,  ii.  119,   120. 
Set   themfelvco  up  againft  all  laws,  ii« 

124. 
Call'd  fo,  becaufe  they  have  no  right*^ 

ii.  133. 
Are  the  worft  of  all  God's  creature?,  ii* 

205. 
F.peak  always  in  the  finguht  Numbetj^ 

ii,  267. 


Ff 


y< 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


V. 

!"r  JA'cur,  the  Roman  was  for  the  good 
\        of  their  country,  i.   202,  203. 
By  the  excell'nce  of  it  the  ^reateft  pow- 
-    ers  in  the  world  were  fubdued  by  the 
Romans,  i.  214. 
VenaUty,   natural  to  courts,  i.  260,  261, 
262,   361,  362. 
Look';  always  after  the  beft  bargain,  i. 
298. 
VerMians,  of  what  they  are  compofed,  i. 


234. 


tzo. 


Relying  on  trade  and  mercenary  foldiers 
too  much,  are   forced  to  depend   on 
foreien  potentates,  ii.  288,  29 T, 
Their  too  great  inclinations  to  peace  ac- 
counted a  mortal  error  in  their  confti- 
tution,  ii.   292. 
Veniccy  the  dukes,  though  ftiled  fupreme, 
vet  are  fo  under  the  power  of  the  law, 
that  divers  have  been  put  to  death  for 
tranfgreflingit,i.3i8.ii.3C9,3io,336. 
Their  noblemens  love  for  the  common- 
wealth, i.  358. 
Concerning  the  council  often,  ii.  281. 
rerdiB  of  juries,  m  this  confifts  the  ftrength 

of  every  judgment,  ii.  224. 
Vertucy  what,  i.  383. 

What  requinte  in  kings,  i.  4.8,  58,  67, 

70,  105,  III. 
Cave  biith  to  the  Grecian  govsrnments, 

!..  61. 
Gives  a  natural  preference  of  one  man 

above  another,  i.  102,  123. 
And  aUb  to  children,  i.  125. 
Carries  the  true  marks  of  fovereignty,  i. 
io3,   114,   183. 


VirtuCy  by  what  means  it  becomes  popular, 

i-  364>  365- 
Thofe  hated  and  feared  who  moft  exceB 

in  it,  i.  369. 

Hated  for  its  own  fake,  i.  383. 

Expires  with  lofs  of  liberty,  i.  393, 

Given  where  God  pleafes  without  diftinc- 

tion,  i.  407. 
Where  it  has  the  advantage,  there  can 

be  no  arbitrary  power,  i.  438. 
Once  blemifhed,  makes  former  fervicca 

forgot,  ii.  100. 
Who  encourage  it  moft,  ii.  174, 
Makes  the  diftindtion  between  men,fim- 

ply  or  relatively  confidered,  i.  202, 
Men  are  truly  ennobled  by  it  only,  ii. 

251. 
Thofe  that  are  enemies  to  her,  and  fear 

not  God,  are  afraid  of  men,  ii.  325. 
The  virtues  of  a  man  die  with  him,  ii* 

361- 
Vice,  mankind  inclined  to  it,  i.  203,  261. 
The  effefts  of  it  to  a  nation,  i.  204, 

205,  312,  328,  350. 
May  be  profitable  to  private  men,  but  can 
never  be  fo  to  the  government,  i.  262, 
Its  deformity  when  moft  confpicuous,  i. 

264* 
What  England  has  loft  by  her  vices,  i« 

300. 
Thofe  of  princes  refult  to  the  damage  of 

the  people,  i.  357,  383,   387.  _ 
The  vermin  that  attend  vicious  princes^, 

i.   392. 
By  what  means,  and  to  what  end,  the 

vices  of  princes  have  been  fomented, 

ii.  48. 


Kever  continues  in  any  race  of  men,  i.     Vicious  perftns,  they   will  fubmit  to  any 


127,  334,  370,  372.  ii.  22S,  361. 

Unentialiy  neccfVary  for  preferving  ot  li- 
berty, i.  1S6,  206,   395. 

When  perfected,  few  will  follow  it,  i. 
204. 

No  way  to  real  honour  without  it,  i, 

^11,  364,  395 


power  that  proroifes  them  impunity, 

i.  274. 
Care  not  what  they  do,  if  they  can  find 
their  account  in  it,  ,i,  175,  176. 
Villains,  little  better  than  flavefi,  appointed 

to  cultivate   the  lands,    and  to  other 

fervile  offices,  ii.  257,  258. 


Not  to  be  ccnhcered  when  it  is  departed    Vtllainy^  where  it  has  been  promoted  to  fu- 
preme dignity,  i.  84,  365. 
What  it  infpires  to  attain  its  end,  i.  59, 

92,  3»4>  3^5- 
Tarquin  hated  only  for  his  villainies,  i* 

321,  322. 

None,  th^t  men  of  defperate  fortunes 

will  not  undertake,  i.  328. 
Sepported  by  committing  yet  more,  i. 


trom,  1.  2;i. 

When  attended  with  certain  dertruftion, 
i.   254,  255,  384,  394.  li.   81. 

TheRtnian,  of  being  as  a  law  to  them- 
lelves,  ii.  259. 

W^liofe  will  be  remembered  in  all  ages, 
J.  273,  30J,  325,  3z6,   393. 

Miikes  as  mary  fcldiersas  there  are  free- 
men, i.   283,   393. 

Overcomes  all  difficulties,  i.  285,   301. 

^nd  ftrength  make  and  pTeferve  con- 
qiieu'^,  i.  307. 

He  thit  hath  virtue  and  power  to  fave  a 


365,  366. 
What  Rome  fuffered  by  it,  i.   377. 
Vitcllius  thrown  into  the  common  fewer,  i. 
331,  332._  ii.  96. 
His  contemptible  charafter,  i.  337- 


people,  cfln  never  want  a  right  of  do-     XJ'pian  his  faying,  ihit  princeps  Ugibus  non 

tenetur,  concludes  nothing  againft  us, 
ii.  230, 


'-,5. 


rcg  It,  3.3: 
C-du  never  long  uphold  what  is  vltious  in 
the  principle,  i.  32S,  3-g. 


Union 


» 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 


Vnion  I  fimiiltu^e  of  interefts,  manners  and 
defigns,  is  a  link  of  it,  i.  270. 

United  Pro-vtKces,  fo  fteddy  in  pradice  and 
principle,  as  hardly   to  be  paralleled 
in  the  world,   i.  294. 
Hew  the  deputies  are  ufed  there,  ii.369, 

370* 
Have  had  dukes,  earls  or  marquefTes,  ii, 

371' 
Vortigern,  the  iaft  and  worft  of  the  British 

kings,  ii.  249. 
His  favcur  to  the  Saxons,  and  carriage  to 

the  Britons,  ii.  264. 
Vox  populi  efi 'VOX  Dei ,  i.  95* 

Nothing  mote  natural  than  to  follow  the 

voice  of  all  mankind,  i.  153.  ii.  342. 
General  confent  is  the  voice  of  nature, 

i.37»39.27i.  .      . 

The  confequence   of  one  voice  in  each 

ftate,  i.  430,  431. 
Ufurpeuon  made  the  firft  king,  i.  31,  33, 

Grounding  pretenfions  of  right  from 
thence,  i.  40,  53,  55,  62,  65,  84, 
92,   135,   183. 

Juftified,  i.  84. 

The  greateft  injury  can  be  done  to  man, 

i.  i35»  273»  3^5- 
"What  power  is  fo,  i.  151,  152. 

By  whom  bid  to  fubmit  to  it,  i.   3 14. 
Lawful  tor  an  injured  people  to  relume 

their  own,  i.  323. 
And  violence,  faid  to  confer  an  incon- 

teftable  right,  i.  410.  ii.  2. 
All  is  deteftable  and  abominable,  ii.  78. 
None  can  deduce  any  title  from  it,  ii. 
270,  271.  _ 
Ufurpers,  Athallah  anufurprefs,  i.  82. 
Have  their  root  in  violence  and  fraud,  i, 

144,  238. 
Seem  to  be  born  for  plagues  to  mankind, 

i.  210. 
"What  lawful  againft  one  is  lawful  i:ga5nft 
all,  that  is,  to  get  rid  of  them,  i.315. 
May  be  fupprefled  as  enemies  and  rob- 
bers, 11.  17. 
Some  that  never  were  conqueror?,  ii.  77. 
Declare  their  contempt  of  all  human  and 


divine  laws,  11. 


183. 


■We  ought  to  examine  the  titles  {9  as  to 
judge  of  them,  ii.  270. 
UJury,  the  cruelty  of  it,  i.  2C9. 

The  mitigation  of  it  compofed  intefiine 


quarrels,  i.   358. 


w 


w. 


ff^ar,  the  Hebrew  government  fitted  theffl 

for  war,  i.  253,  291, 
Of  Charles  duke  of  Burgundy  with  the 

Swifs  cantons,  i.  293. 
Better  performed  in  popular  governments 

than  in  monarchies,  i.  303. 
It  h  decertatio  per 'vitTiy  i.  314. 
"When  the  people  may  engage  in  it  juftly, 

i-  3H.   315- 
What   to  be  accounted  making  of  war, 

ii.  18,  19. 
Differs  much  from  what  it  was  formerly, 

ii.  58. 
There  is  fuch  a  thing  among  men  as  a 

juft  war,  and  why,  ii.  78. 
Kings  of  Judah   could   not  make   any 

without  the  confent  of  the  Sanhediin, 

ii.  85. 
Whether  a  fubje£l  may  examine  if  it  be 

juft  or  unjuft,  ii.  181. 
Where  the  caufe  of  it  is  originally  juft, 

and  it  proves  fucceGful,  what  right 

the  generals  have  over  their  enemies, 

ii.  283. 
The  events  of  it  various,  11.298. 
TFariy  civil,  onlymide  by  members  of  the 

civil  fociety,  i,  215,  216. 
None  till  the  times  of  Marius,  Sylla  and 

Catiline,  i.  216. 
Efteemed  the  bft  ftiugglings  of  expiring 

liberty,  j.  216. 
The  root  of  the  Romans,  what,  i.  231. 
In  France,  i.  242,  243,  352,  353. 
From  whence  they  arife,  i.   309,  354, 

35  ^ 
Pretences  for   thcra  commonly  falfe,  i. 

312. 
When  they  will  always  be  frequent,  i. 

347- 

What  reigns  moft  accompanied  wiifi 
them,  J.  348,   349. 

In  Spain,  i.  353. 

More  in  kingdoms  than  in  common- 
wealths, i.  357,   373,  377. 

Not  the  gjeatelt  evil   that  bi^tals  nations, 

J.     _)  /  -. 

1  he  Romans  and  Grecians  glory  in  free- 
ing their  countries  from  a  civil  war,  i. 

39S,  399- 
In  Machidvci's  account  are  a  difeafe,   ii. 

340. 
Wardi,  that  court,  how  the  inftitution  of 

it  was  perverced,  i.  88. 
JVefminfier ,  what  its  privileges  in  point  of 

elections,  ii.   318. 
?^'7fW«£j}  makes  men  cowards,  i.  412. 


Antonnefsf  from  whence  it  proceeds.    Will,  is  ever  drawn  by  fome  real  good,  or 


1.  217. 

lyar  and  peace,  the  kings  of  Sparta  never 
h  id  the  power  of  either,  i.  i  56,  I  57. 
Trar.fadted  by  the  col!e(n:ed  booy  of  the 
people,  i.  174  ■  -■ '«  178. 


the  appearance  of  it,  i.   64. 
The  dividing  of  the  world  Icttto  the  will 

of  man,  i.  75. 
PafiTing  for  law,  the  effetl?  of  it,  i.  194, 

410,  411,  447'  "•  378. 

mn. 


An  Alphabetical  TABLE. 

OTttl,  wtere  this  is  the  rule,  the  prince  fcts    fVorJi  men,  tyranny  fet  up  by  them,  h 


up  an  intereft  feparate   from   that  of 
his  people,  i.  439. 
William  the  firft,  eledted  a  ckro  &  po^ulo, 
i.  14.5.  ii.  88,  89.  ^ 
Could  inherit  nothing,  i.   156. 
On  what  conditions  fvvorn  to  be  receiv- 
ed, ii.  144. 
In  his  time  our  anceftors  were  in  a  low 
condition,  ii.  232. 
Wifdom^  not  always  annexed  to  the  cha- 
ra<fler  of  kings,  i.  86. 
When  men  give  teftimony  of  it,  i.  87. 
"Whofe  we  ought  to  admire  and  imitate, 

i.  320. 
The  wifeft  men  moft  fit  for  government, 

i.  187. 
Of  man  imperfed,  i.  244. 
A  kind  of  ability  to  difpatch  fome  fort  of 

affairs,  is  fo  called,  i.  407. 
Of  the  coiledted  body  of  the  people  fiir- 
^pafTes  that  of  a  fingle  man,  i.   386. 
WitneJfeSf    falfe,    encouraged,    and   called 
cujiodeskgum,  i.   204,  261. 
No  fufficient  defence  againft  them  either 

by  the  laws  of  Gcd  or  man,  i.  2$l. 
Minifters  of  iniquity,  i.  306,  3S8, 
Coui;tenancedat  Rome,  i.  375. 
The  beft  tribunals  in  the  world  may  be 

milled  by  them,  i.  413. 
Irifh,  I.  204. 
Wiltena-G emote,  its  power  as  declared  by 
Camden,  ii.  252. 
The  power  of  the  nation  refided  in  them, 
ii.  256,  316,  317. 
JVomen,  on  what  account  they  are  excluded 
in  France  and  Turkey,  i.  80,  159, 
339.  ii.   150,  152,  280. 
And  were  by  other  nations,  i.  81,  Si, 

Some  do  aJrait  thtm,  i.   159,  339. 
What   have  governed  kings,  but  fcldoii 
fenatcs  or  popular  affemblles,  i.   346, 
361,  362. 
"What  mifchicfs  kings  have  been  guilty 
of  tu  gratify  them,  ii.   363. 
Work,  that  of  all   magiftrates  and   gover- 
nors, i.  96,  ic6. 
Worji  men  advanced,  and  raoft  ambitious  to 
be  fo,  i.   89,  100,  101,    III,   112, 
123. 
And  by  whom  preferred,  i,  265,  26S, 

269,  273. 
Stiled  fjtheii  of  iheir  people,  i.  95,  97. 
Have  their  tools  to  execute  their  decei- 
tabledeHgn:,  i.  225. 


273 — 276. 

Engaged  in  all  tumults,  i.  329,  330. 

Moft  frequently  have  obtained  the  em- 
pire by  the  worft  means,  i.  337, 

Their  principles  ought  to  be  dellroyed, 
i.    364. 

Eafily  fwallow  bribes,  i.  366,  367,  371. 

Have  moft  power  in  fome  courts,  i.369, 
370.  _ 

How  princes  become  fo,  asalfo  the  moft 
miferable,  i.  439. 

Delight  in  the  worft  things,  ii.  30. 

Whom  they  had  no  need  to  fear^  ii,  8r, 

What  bafe  courfes  they  take  to  gain  the 
favour  of  weak  and  vicious  princes, 
ii.   105. 

What  encourages  them  to  murder  the 
beft  of  princes,  ii.  236. 
Worthy  men  in  all  times  fufpef^ed  for  their 
virtue,  i.  204,  205. 

Ought  to  be  had  in  higheft  veneration, 
ii.  213. 
Wrong,  is  a  breach  of  the  laws,  which  de- 
termine what  is  right,  i.  411. 

If  there  be  none  done,  there  can  be  no 
revenge,  i.  411. 

Where  kings  can  do  none,  ii,  355, 

X. 

XEr.cphon,  why  he  called  Agefilaus  3 
good  and  faithful  king,  i.   155, 
Conduced  the  Grecians  retreat  indefpite 
of  above  400000  men,  who  endea- 
voured to  oppofe  them,  i,  iqS, 
His  opinion  concerning  tyranny,  i,  247. 
For  ariftocracy,  i.  248,  249,  276. 
XfrxeSy  his  folly  in  infiiding  ilripes  on  the 
fea,  i.  86 
His  invafion  of  Greece,  i.  2S5, 

Y. 

YNca  CarcilaJJo  of  Peru,  the  fabulous 
flory  of  him,  i.   335. 
TQungtr  brothers  pieferred  to  the  elder,  r. 
45,  46,  162. 


Eal,  excefs  of  v.ulence  is  but  an  ill 
tK'.ljaiji!;  of  it,  i.  293. 
When  it  can  never  be  capabie  of  excefs, 
ii.  iS. 
Zunrl,  his  title  to  the  fupreme  honour  how 

acquired,  i.  5S, 
Xoroafter,  fuppoled  to  be  Ham,  i,  c,^. 


F    I    N    I 


S. 


~^,> 


%i'lf